Proposed Tech Specs Revising Section 3/4.10.3,defining Testing Necessary for Consistency Between Limiting Condition for Operation & Surveillance RequirementsML20006E240 |
Person / Time |
---|
Site: |
Sequoyah |
---|
Issue date: |
02/14/1990 |
---|
From: |
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY |
---|
To: |
|
---|
Shared Package |
---|
ML20006E239 |
List: |
---|
References |
---|
NUDOCS 9002220378 |
Download: ML20006E240 (8) |
|
|
---|
Category:TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
MONTHYEARML20217F9701999-10-14014 October 1999 Proposed Tech Specs,Incorporating ARC for Axial Primary Water Stress Corrosion Cracking at Dented Tube Support Plate Intersections ML20217E4301999-10-12012 October 1999 Proposed Tech Specs,Revising Requirements for Containment Penetrations During Refueling Operations ML20211M7341999-08-30030 August 1999 Marked-up & Revised TS Pages,Providing Alternative to Requirement of Actually Measuring Response Times ML20211K1201999-08-30030 August 1999 Proposed Tech Specs,Adding New Specification That Addresses Use of Interim Provisions Upon Discovery of Unintended TS Action ML20211K1721999-08-30030 August 1999 Proposed Tech Specs,Providing Clarification to Current TS Requirements for Containment Isolation Valves ML20209B7731999-06-30030 June 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Updating Requirmements for RCS Leakage Detection & RCS Operational Leakage Specifications to Be Consistent with NUREG-1431 ML20196G4701999-06-24024 June 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Pages Re Amends to Licenses DPR-77 & DPR-79,revising TS to Be Consistent with Rev to ISTS Presently Submitted to NEI TSTF for Submittal as Rev to NUREG-1431 ML20196F2211999-06-24024 June 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Pages for Amend to Licenses DPR-77 & DPR-79,allowing Use of Fully Qualified & Tested Spare Inverter in Place of Any of Eight Required Inverters ML20196G7961999-06-22022 June 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Bases,Clarifying Proper Application of TS Requirements for Power Distribution Systems & Functions That Inverters Provide to Maintain Operability & Providing Updated Info on Cold Leg Injection Accumulators ML20195E9841999-06-0707 June 1999 Proposed Tech Specs,Increasing Max Allowed Specific Activity of Primary Coolant from 0.35 Microcuries/Gram Dose Equivalent I-131 to 1.0 Microcuries/Gram Dose Equivalent I-131 for Plant Cycle 10 (U2C10) Core ML20206E1391999-04-29029 April 1999 Proposed Tech Spec Change 99-03, Main Control Room Emergency Ventilation Sys Versus Radiation Monitors. Changes Add LCOs 3.3.3.1 & 3.7.7 to Address Inoperability of Radiation Monitoring CREVS & NUREG-1431 Recommendations ML20206E1611999-04-29029 April 1999 Proposed Tech Spec Change 99-04, Auxiliary Suction Pressure Low Surveillance Frequency Rev. Change Deletes Surveillance ML20204H4081999-03-19019 March 1999 Proposed Tech Specs,Relocating TS 3.8.3.1,3.8.3.2,3.8.3.3 & Associated Bases Associated with Electrical Equipment Protective Devices to Technical Requirements Manual ML20207F7631999-03-0202 March 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Pages Re Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-77 & DPR-79,deleting Iseg from License Conditions ML20207D6011999-02-26026 February 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Relocating TS 3.7.6, Flood Protection Plan & Associated Bases from TS to Plant TRM ML20207D6331999-02-26026 February 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Providing for Consistency When Exiting Action Statements Associated with EDG Sets ML20206S0131999-01-15015 January 1999 Proposed Tech Specs 3.3.3.3, Seismic Instrumentation & Associated Bases,Relocated to Plant Technical Requirements Manual ML20199K6001999-01-15015 January 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Adding New Action Statement to 3.1.3.2 That Would Eliminate Need to Enter TS 3.0.3 Whenever Two or More Individual RPIs Per Bank May Be Inoperable,While Maintaining Appropriate Overall Level of Protection ML20195H6111998-11-16016 November 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Revising EDG SRs by Adding Note That Allows SR to Be Performed in Modes 1,2,3 or 4 If Associated Components Are Already OOS for Testing or Maint & Removing SR Verifying Certain Lockout Features Prevent EDG Starting ML20154H7251998-10-0808 October 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Pages,Supplementing Proposed TS Change 96-08,rev 1 to Add CRMP to Administrative Controls Section & Bases of TS ML20238F1091998-08-27027 August 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Providing for Insertion of Limited Number of Lead Test Assemblies,Beginning W/Unit 2 Operating Cycle 10 Core ML20238F3001998-08-27027 August 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Replacing 72 H AOT of TS 3.8.1.1,Action b,w/7 Day AOT Requirement for Inoperability of One EDG or One Train of EDGs ML20236G5961998-06-29029 June 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Typed Pages for TS Change 95-19, Section 6 - Administrative Controls Deletions ML20249C6371998-06-26026 June 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Lowering Specific Activity of Primary Coolant from 1.0 Uci/G Dose Equivalent I-131 to 0.35 Uci/G Dose Equivalent I-131,as Provided in GL 95-05 ML20248F0051998-05-28028 May 1998 Proposed Tech Specs for Section 6, Administrative Controls Deletions ML20217N3511998-04-30030 April 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Pages,Modifying Surveillance Requirement 4.4.3.2.1.b to Change Mode Requirement to Allow PORV Stroke Testing in Modes 3,4 & 5 W/Steam Bubble in Pressurizer Rather than Only in Mode 4 ML20203J1681998-02-25025 February 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Pages,Revising EDG Surveillance Requirements to Delete Requirement for 18-month Insp IAW Procedures Prepared in Conjunction W/Vendor Recommendations & Modify SRs Associated W/Verifying Capability of DGs ML20202J7141998-02-13013 February 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Adding New LCO That Addresses Requirements for Main Feedwater Isolation,Regulating & Bypass Valves ML20202J7601998-02-13013 February 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Section 3.7.9 Re Relocation of Snubber Requirements ML20202J6961998-02-13013 February 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Incorporating MSIV Requirements to Be Consistent W/Std TS (NUREG-1431) ML20198T4311998-01-21021 January 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Re New Position Title & Update of Description of Nuclear Organization ML20199K4571997-11-21021 November 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Adding one-time Allowance Through Operating Cycle 9 to Surveillance Requirement 4.4.3.2.1.b to Perform Stroke Testing of PORVs in Mode 5 Rather than Mode 4,as Currently Required ML20211A3191997-09-17017 September 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Re Pressure Differential Surveillance Requirements for Containment Spray Pumps ML20137T0871997-04-0909 April 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Re Elimination of Cycle 8 Limitation for SG Alternate Plugging Criteria ML20137M8581997-04-0101 April 1997 Proposed Tech Specs 2.1 Re Safety Limits & TS 3/4.2 Re Power Distribution Limits ML20137C8421997-03-19019 March 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Re Conversion from Westinghouse Electric Corp Fuel to Framatome Cogema Fuel ML20136J0381997-03-13013 March 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Section 5.6.1.2,revising Enrichment of Fuel for New Fuel Pit Storage Racks ML20134P8631997-02-14014 February 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Requesting Discretionary Enforcement for 48 Hours Which Is in Addition to 72 Hours Allowed Outage Time Provided by TS Action 3.8.1.1.b ML20134K9981997-02-0707 February 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Revising TS Change Request 96-01, Conversion from W Electric Corp Fuel to Framatome Cogema Fuel (MARK-BW-17), to Ensure That Core Analysis Computer Code Output Actions Are Consistent W/Hot Channel Factor SRs ML20134L9261996-11-0808 November 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Re Placing of Channel in Trip for Reactor Trip & Engineered Safety Feature Instrumentation Sys Solely to Perform Testing as Not Requiring Channel to Be Declared Inoperable ML20129D2661996-10-18018 October 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Removing Existing Footnotes That Limit Application of Apc for Plant S/G Tubes to Cycle 8 Operation for Both Units ML20129G7301996-09-26026 September 1996 Proposed Tech Specs 3/4.3.3 Re Fire Detection instrumentation,3/4.7.11 Re Fire Suppression Systems & 3/4.7.12 Re Fire Protection Penetrations ML20113G2691996-09-20020 September 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Change 96-09, Clarification of Work Shift Durations for Overtime Limits ML20117J3391996-08-28028 August 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Revising Psv & MSSV Setpoint Tolerance from Plus or Minus 1% to Plus or Minus 3% ML20117D1651996-08-22022 August 1996 Proposed Tech Specs of SQN Units 1 & 2,deleting Table 4.8.1, DG Reliability, & Revising Section 3.8.1 to Allow Once Per 18 month,7 Day AOT for EDGs ML20117D3121996-08-22022 August 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Lowering Minimum TS ice-basket Weight of 1,155 Lbs to 1,071 Lbs.Reduced Overall Ice Weight from 2,245,320 Lbs to 2,082,024 Lbs ML20117D3141996-08-21021 August 1996 Proposed TS 3.7.1.3 Re Condensate Storage Tank ML20117D3341996-08-21021 August 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Re Deletion of Surveillance Requirement 4.8.1.1.1.b ML20112H0431996-06-0707 June 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Revising Section 6, Administrative Controls, to Be More Closely Aligned W/Requirements of STSs ML20101N7071996-04-0404 April 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Allowing Conversion from Westinghouse Fuel to Fuel Provided by Framatome Cogema Fuels 1999-08-30
[Table view] Category:TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS & TEST REPORTS
MONTHYEARML20217F9701999-10-14014 October 1999 Proposed Tech Specs,Incorporating ARC for Axial Primary Water Stress Corrosion Cracking at Dented Tube Support Plate Intersections ML20217E4301999-10-12012 October 1999 Proposed Tech Specs,Revising Requirements for Containment Penetrations During Refueling Operations ML20211K1201999-08-30030 August 1999 Proposed Tech Specs,Adding New Specification That Addresses Use of Interim Provisions Upon Discovery of Unintended TS Action ML20211M7341999-08-30030 August 1999 Marked-up & Revised TS Pages,Providing Alternative to Requirement of Actually Measuring Response Times ML20211K1721999-08-30030 August 1999 Proposed Tech Specs,Providing Clarification to Current TS Requirements for Containment Isolation Valves ML20209B7731999-06-30030 June 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Updating Requirmements for RCS Leakage Detection & RCS Operational Leakage Specifications to Be Consistent with NUREG-1431 ML20196F2211999-06-24024 June 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Pages for Amend to Licenses DPR-77 & DPR-79,allowing Use of Fully Qualified & Tested Spare Inverter in Place of Any of Eight Required Inverters ML20196G4701999-06-24024 June 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Pages Re Amends to Licenses DPR-77 & DPR-79,revising TS to Be Consistent with Rev to ISTS Presently Submitted to NEI TSTF for Submittal as Rev to NUREG-1431 ML20196G7961999-06-22022 June 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Bases,Clarifying Proper Application of TS Requirements for Power Distribution Systems & Functions That Inverters Provide to Maintain Operability & Providing Updated Info on Cold Leg Injection Accumulators ML20196G8071999-06-22022 June 1999 Revs to Technical Requirements Manual ML20195E9841999-06-0707 June 1999 Proposed Tech Specs,Increasing Max Allowed Specific Activity of Primary Coolant from 0.35 Microcuries/Gram Dose Equivalent I-131 to 1.0 Microcuries/Gram Dose Equivalent I-131 for Plant Cycle 10 (U2C10) Core ML20206E1611999-04-29029 April 1999 Proposed Tech Spec Change 99-04, Auxiliary Suction Pressure Low Surveillance Frequency Rev. Change Deletes Surveillance ML20206E1391999-04-29029 April 1999 Proposed Tech Spec Change 99-03, Main Control Room Emergency Ventilation Sys Versus Radiation Monitors. Changes Add LCOs 3.3.3.1 & 3.7.7 to Address Inoperability of Radiation Monitoring CREVS & NUREG-1431 Recommendations ML20204E8501999-03-21021 March 1999 Plant,Four Yr Simulator Test Rept for Period Ending 990321 ML20204H4081999-03-19019 March 1999 Proposed Tech Specs,Relocating TS 3.8.3.1,3.8.3.2,3.8.3.3 & Associated Bases Associated with Electrical Equipment Protective Devices to Technical Requirements Manual ML20207F7631999-03-0202 March 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Pages Re Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-77 & DPR-79,deleting Iseg from License Conditions ML20207D6011999-02-26026 February 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Relocating TS 3.7.6, Flood Protection Plan & Associated Bases from TS to Plant TRM ML20207D6331999-02-26026 February 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Providing for Consistency When Exiting Action Statements Associated with EDG Sets ML20199K6001999-01-15015 January 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Adding New Action Statement to 3.1.3.2 That Would Eliminate Need to Enter TS 3.0.3 Whenever Two or More Individual RPIs Per Bank May Be Inoperable,While Maintaining Appropriate Overall Level of Protection ML20206S0131999-01-15015 January 1999 Proposed Tech Specs 3.3.3.3, Seismic Instrumentation & Associated Bases,Relocated to Plant Technical Requirements Manual ML20195H6111998-11-16016 November 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Revising EDG SRs by Adding Note That Allows SR to Be Performed in Modes 1,2,3 or 4 If Associated Components Are Already OOS for Testing or Maint & Removing SR Verifying Certain Lockout Features Prevent EDG Starting ML20154H7251998-10-0808 October 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Pages,Supplementing Proposed TS Change 96-08,rev 1 to Add CRMP to Administrative Controls Section & Bases of TS ML20238F3001998-08-27027 August 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Replacing 72 H AOT of TS 3.8.1.1,Action b,w/7 Day AOT Requirement for Inoperability of One EDG or One Train of EDGs ML20238F1091998-08-27027 August 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Providing for Insertion of Limited Number of Lead Test Assemblies,Beginning W/Unit 2 Operating Cycle 10 Core ML20209J1631998-08-0707 August 1998 Rev 41 to Sequoyah Nuclear Plant Odcm ML20236G5961998-06-29029 June 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Typed Pages for TS Change 95-19, Section 6 - Administrative Controls Deletions ML20249C6371998-06-26026 June 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Lowering Specific Activity of Primary Coolant from 1.0 Uci/G Dose Equivalent I-131 to 0.35 Uci/G Dose Equivalent I-131,as Provided in GL 95-05 ML20248F0051998-05-28028 May 1998 Proposed Tech Specs for Section 6, Administrative Controls Deletions ML20217N3511998-04-30030 April 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Pages,Modifying Surveillance Requirement 4.4.3.2.1.b to Change Mode Requirement to Allow PORV Stroke Testing in Modes 3,4 & 5 W/Steam Bubble in Pressurizer Rather than Only in Mode 4 ML20203J1681998-02-25025 February 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Pages,Revising EDG Surveillance Requirements to Delete Requirement for 18-month Insp IAW Procedures Prepared in Conjunction W/Vendor Recommendations & Modify SRs Associated W/Verifying Capability of DGs ML20202J7141998-02-13013 February 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Adding New LCO That Addresses Requirements for Main Feedwater Isolation,Regulating & Bypass Valves ML20202J7651998-02-13013 February 1998 Technical Requirements Manual ML20202J6961998-02-13013 February 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Incorporating MSIV Requirements to Be Consistent W/Std TS (NUREG-1431) ML20202J7601998-02-13013 February 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Section 3.7.9 Re Relocation of Snubber Requirements ML20198T4311998-01-21021 January 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Re New Position Title & Update of Description of Nuclear Organization ML20199F8231997-11-30030 November 1997 Cycle 9 Restart Physics Test Summary, for 971011-971130 ML20199K4571997-11-21021 November 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Adding one-time Allowance Through Operating Cycle 9 to Surveillance Requirement 4.4.3.2.1.b to Perform Stroke Testing of PORVs in Mode 5 Rather than Mode 4,as Currently Required ML20211A3191997-09-17017 September 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Re Pressure Differential Surveillance Requirements for Containment Spray Pumps ML20203B9731997-08-0505 August 1997 Rev 1 to RD-466, Test & Calculated Results Pressure Locking ML20217J5581997-07-31031 July 1997 Cycle Restart Physics Test Summary, for Jul 1997 ML20210J1671997-04-30030 April 1997 Snp Unit 1 Cycle 8 Refueling Outage Mar-Apr 1997,Results of SG Tube ISI as Required by TS Section 4.4.5.5.b & Results of Alternate Plugging Criteria Implementation as Required by Commitment from TS License Condition 2C(9)(d) ML20137T0871997-04-0909 April 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Re Elimination of Cycle 8 Limitation for SG Alternate Plugging Criteria ML20137M8581997-04-0101 April 1997 Proposed Tech Specs 2.1 Re Safety Limits & TS 3/4.2 Re Power Distribution Limits ML20137C8421997-03-19019 March 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Re Conversion from Westinghouse Electric Corp Fuel to Framatome Cogema Fuel ML20136J0381997-03-13013 March 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Section 5.6.1.2,revising Enrichment of Fuel for New Fuel Pit Storage Racks ML20134P8631997-02-14014 February 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Requesting Discretionary Enforcement for 48 Hours Which Is in Addition to 72 Hours Allowed Outage Time Provided by TS Action 3.8.1.1.b ML20134K9981997-02-0707 February 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Revising TS Change Request 96-01, Conversion from W Electric Corp Fuel to Framatome Cogema Fuel (MARK-BW-17), to Ensure That Core Analysis Computer Code Output Actions Are Consistent W/Hot Channel Factor SRs ML20138F2581997-01-17017 January 1997 Rev 39 to Sequoyah Nuclear Plant Odcm ML20134L9261996-11-0808 November 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Re Placing of Channel in Trip for Reactor Trip & Engineered Safety Feature Instrumentation Sys Solely to Perform Testing as Not Requiring Channel to Be Declared Inoperable ML20129D2661996-10-18018 October 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Removing Existing Footnotes That Limit Application of Apc for Plant S/G Tubes to Cycle 8 Operation for Both Units 1999-08-30
[Table view] |
Text
jr;;s..l: :M((W q
4
.-p cc;-., -
4 M ':5m m,'s r;,
9, r+ <
,e
',t.
4 4,h_
7 t-ENCLOSURE l'?
O~
4
-. TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION BASES CHANGE
- SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR PLANT-UNITS-1-'AND 2_
k, "
-DOCKET NOS. 50-327 AND 50-328 h~
r-(TVA-SQN-TS-89-07)..
g.<
L4.
~
'E LIST OF AFFECTED PAGES Unit 1
-B3/4 10-1--
Unit 2 B3/4 10 r, -
[' A'c
( ii, s
k L
i
- 1. f.
s+
e
,?
Y oe t
4 p
,V l'... 9 (e
-'i
'[Q 00 27 j
)gg22ggg7B u
eo guc v
q P: f a ~
. n.,.
,4 s
E
[
~. _
_. ~._
[7
' ^
-SPECIAL TEST EXCEPTIONS 3/4.10.3 PHYSICS TESTS L
LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION 3.10.3 The limitations of Specifications 3.1.1. 3, 3.1.1. 4, 3.1. 3.1, 3.1. 3. 5 and 3.1.3.6 may be suspended during the performance of PHYSICS TESTS provided:
The THERMAL POWER does not exceed 5% of RATED THERM /.L POWER, a.
b.
The reactor trip setpoints on the OPERABLE Intermediate and Power Range Nuclear Channels low trip setpoints are set at less than ur equal to 25% of RATED THERMAL POWER, and g
The Reactor Coolant System lowest operating loop temperature (T c.
is greater than or equal to 531*F.
avg)
APPLICABILITY: MODE 2.
. ACTION:
With the THERMAL POWER greater than 5% of RATED THERMAL POWER, a.
immediately open the reactor trip breakers.
b.
With a Reactor Coolant System operating loop temperature (T,yg than 531*F, restore T to within its limits within 15 minutes or av9 be in at least HOT STANOBY within the next 15 minutes.
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.10 3.1 of RATED. THERMAL POWER at least once per hour during PHYS 4.10.3.2 Each Intermediate and Power Range Channel shall be subjected to a CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST within 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> prior to initiating PHYSICS TESTS.
'4.10.3.3 The' Reactor Coolant System temperature (T,yg) shall be determined to be greater than or equal to 531*F at least once per 30 minutes during PHYSICS TESTS.
f1 t
SEQUOYAH - UNIT 1 3/4 10-3
/
3/4.10 SPECIAL TEST EXCEPTIONS BASES 3/4.10.1 SHUTolvil PARGIN This special test exception provides that a minieum amount of control rod worth is immediately available for reactivity control when tests are performed for control rod worth measurement.
This special test exception is reouired to permit the periodic verification of the actual versus predicted core reactivity condition occurrino as a result of fuel burnup or fuel cycling operations.
~
3/A.10.2 GROUP HEIGHT, INSERTION, AND POWEP DISTRIBUTION LIMITS Tiis special test exception permits individual control rods to be positio}ned outside of their nomal oroup heights and insertion limits durina the performance of such PHYSICS TESTS as those reauired to 1) measure control rod worth and 2) detemine the reactor stability index and danping factor under xenon oscillation conditions.
3/a.10.3 PHYSICS TESTS This special test exceotion oemits DHYSICS TF.STS to Fe nerfomed at less than or eoual-to 5% of PATED THEPPAL P0ldEP with the PCS T slichtly lower than nonnally allowed so that the fundarental nuclear cha$teristics of the reactor core and related instrumentation can be verified.
In order for various characteristics to be accurately measured it is, at times, necessary to operate outside the normal restrictions of these technical Specifications.
For instance, to reasure the roderator temperature coefficient at POL it is necessary to position various control rods at heiahts which ray not normally be allowed by Specification 3.1.3.6 which ray cause the PCS T slightly below the minimum temperature of Specification 3.1.1Np' to fall 3/4.10.4 DEACTOR COOLANT LOOPS This scecial test exception pemits reactor criticality under no flow
. conditions and is recuired to Derfonn certain startup and PHYSICS TESTS while at low THEP!'AL POWP levels.
3/4 10.5 POSITION INDICATI0F SYSTEP-SPUTODUM This soecial test exception oemits the rosition indication sv: vs to be 1
inoperable during rod drop time measurements. The exception is reouired since the data necessary to determine the rod drop tire is derived ' rom the induced voltaae in the position indicator coils as the rod is-drooped.
This induced voltaae is small comoared to the nomal voltaae and, therefore, can not he observed if the position indication systems remain OPEDAPLF.
SEnUOYAH - UNIT 1 P 3/4 10-1 pokunee/furmdd $o Jpecske.s$k 4' /0. 3. R errsu <<<
tM t>(a,:,,L.,a A.4 n / powa-mya m & 4 y
. 4,a &
wAk4 opa-J,+
/m +;G o< apud&25%DM n/Eema. /owen ora. m;/aMc /o 4,. / p o w - eaanun, drag N/YJICJ TE.rT.r.
3/4.10 SPECIAL TEST EXCEPTIONS
-BASES 3/4'.10.I SHUTOOWN MARGIN This special test exception provides that a minimum amount of control rod worth'is immediately available for reactivity control when tests are performed for control rod worth measurement.
This special test exception is required to permit the periodic verification of the actual versus predicted core reactivity condition occuring as a result of fuel burnup or fuel cycling operations.
3/4.10.2 GROUP HEIGHT, INSERTION, AND POWER DISTRIBUTION LIMITS This special test exception permits individual-control rods to be positioned outside of their normal group heights and insertion limits during the performance of such PHYSICS TESTS as those required to 1) measure control rod worth and 2) determi'ne the reactor stability index and damping factor under xenon oscillation conditions.
3/4.10.3 PHYSICS TESTS This special test exception permits PHYSICS TESTS to be performed at less than or equal to 5% of RATED THERMAL POWER with the RCS T slightly lower than normally allowe'd so that the fundamental nuclear chaN8teristics of the reactor core and related instrumentation can be verified. 'In order for various characteristics to be accurately measured, it is at times necessary to operate outside the normal restrictions of these Technical Specifications.
For instance, to measure the mcderator temnerature coefficient at BOL, it. is necessary to position the various controi rods at heights which may not normally be allowed by Specification 3.1.3.6 which in turn may cause the RCS T,y9 to fall slightly below the minimum temperature of Specification 3.1.1.4.
t 3/4.10.4 REACTOR COOLANT LOOPS
.This special test exception permits reactor criticality under no flow conditions and is required to perform certain startup and PHYSICS TESTS while at low THERMAL POWER levels.
3/4.10.5 POSITION INDICATION SYSTEM-SHUTDOWN This special test exception permits the position indication systems to be inoperable during rod drop time measurements.
The exception is required since the data necessary to determine the rod drop time is derived from the induced voltage in the position indicator coils as the rod is dropped.
This induced voltage is small compared to the normal voltage and, therefore, can not be observed if the position indication systems remain OPERABLE.
SEQUOYAH - UNIT'2 B 3/4 10-1
~
N /y edme/ p< man f 4 J,seo An Ah,,
4'/0. 3. 2 eiun w Tid a,/e-m u k A a n / p o w
<snea rue 4< fys de Gon.,
JM o,sc~4 o / An L o< ef : / 4. w 2 atreo ovosa d 4,:/,a-cuu<ra-L Tasms souen an Qf.. :,y /WKGu 72nx J
/
~.
Wik w.
. i
+
k[ gg _
^ Yru 1
- ty' g p e:r y
x s
g :<:
. ;,3
~..
+
i
- - 4.
s
> ~
2 ENCLOSURE 2
-n-
- TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION BASES CHANGE-
)
-SEQUOYAH-NUCLEAR PLANT UNITS.1 AND 2
~
~
' DOCKET NOS.'50-327'AND 50-3281 f
F, e
'(TVA-SQN-TS-89-07)..
w i
.e
~
a DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION FOR-'
l
's y.
REVISING BASES SECTION 3/4.10.3 l
F.'.
- o. _
fI F
?
A e
?
2 v
f 4
m
[
-y,
.+
C r
3 i I
t.
t lk a
-a w
-g
+
[
i
?
?>
(
0
.i,y-4
.t E
y I
'l,
,, - - -. +. -,
A.
. J #
-e e - w-
- 1 w-
- < - - - - ' - ~ - - - - *
'" ~ ~ " "
1, -
ENCLOSURE 2
-s
_l Description of Chang Tennessee Valley Authority is modifying the Sequoyah Nuclea.- Plant (SQN)
Unita 1 and 2 Technical Specifications (TSs) Bases Section 3/4.10.3 to accurately define the testing requirements'of Surveillance Requirement (SR) 4.10.3.2.
This material is being provided to NRC for information purposes.
Reason and Justification for Change Limiting Condition for Operation (LCO) 3.10.3.b_ requires that for the performance of low power physics testi.ng (pursuant to TS 3/4.10.3), the intermediate and power range low reactor trip setpoints must be set at less than or equal to 25 percent rated thermal power. SR 4.10.3.2 requirds that channel functional tests be performed on the intermediate and power-range channels within 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> of initiating physics testing.
The revision to Bases Section 3/4.10.3 is made to define that for
- onsistency between LCO 3.10.3.b and SR 4.10.3.2, only the intermediate and power range low setpoint reactor trip functions, operating at less than or equal to 25 percent rated thermal power, need to be functionally tested for the performance of physics testing. The functional test of these trips within 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> of initiating physics testing provides an additional amount of assurance that the low power reactor trips are available to limit power excursions during the physics tests.
Operability of all intermediate and power range functions is demonstrated prior to entry into Mode 2 in accordance with TSs 2.2.1 and 3/4 3.1.
Environmental Impact Evaluation The bases change does not involve an unrevi.wed environmental question because operation of SQN Units 1 and 2 in accordance with this change, would not:-
1.
Result in a significant increase in any adverse environmental impact previously evaluated in the Final Environmental Statement (FES) as modified by the Staff's testimony to the Atomic Safety _and Licensing Board, supplements to the FES, environmental impact appraisals, or decisions of the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board.
2.
Result in a significant change in effluents or power levels.
3.
Result in matters not previously reviewed in the licensing basis for
-SQN that may have a significant environmental impact.
%;Eg + ;
- gcp1,
_._ ~.,
~
g y yn'i'ii.
j
+
'^
( Lif *,
j al
} ;h
+
c
]
F
{lhf -
{
9
~~n 6
f c ENCLOSURE '~ 3 --
D
.)
4 T
- TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION BASES CHANGE
.i
-,- i SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR PLANT UNITS l'AND 2 cm
- DOCKET NOS. 50-327 AND 50-328 :
~
1
-j (TVA-SQN-TS-89-07) o
- DETERMINATION OF KO SIGNIFICANT HAZARDS CONSIDERATIONS 4
4
,g 1
>?
- [
.1
- ,- e 6
-/
-s a
s '
ti
.I; 1
3Y I
1 j 1
3 s-0 0
P i
E 4
l
' a; e,
In' n
[
Y
$~
L r
n l -.
t
. r..-
s
s.
'yJ y,
[,.,
,c r
m.
ENCLOSURE 3 Significant Hazards Evaluation TVA has evaluated the TS bases change and has determir.e6 that it does not represent a significant hazards consideration based on criteria established in 10 CFR 50.92(c). Operation of SQN in accordance with the change will not:
(1) Involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated.
The LCOs of TF 3.10.3 ensure that reactor core parameters are maintained wi.hin acceptable limits during the performance of low po'wer physics testing. LCO 3.10.3.b specifically requires the intermediate and power range low reactor trip setpoints to be set at less than or equal to 25 percent rated thermal powe-The bases revision does not alter this requirement.
Tb1 change merely clarifies that testing performed for SR 4.10.3.2 verifies the operability of the functions required by LCO 3.10.3.b.
Because the requirements of LCO 3.10.3 remain unchanged and will continue to be met by the performance of surveillance testing, the bases change will not increase the probability or consequences of a previously evaluated accident.
(2) Create the possibility of a new or dif ferent kind. of. accident f rom any previously analyzed.
The bases change is made to provide consistency between the requirements of LCO 3.10.3.b and SR 4.10.3.2.
There are no changes to the design, method of operation, or physics testing methods. As such, the possibility of a new or different accident from those l
previously analyzed is not created.
(3) Involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety.
L As described above, the change made to Bases Section 3/4.10.3 is made to clearly define the testing necessary to ensure that the requirements of LCO 3.10.3.b are satisfied. Because the requirements of LCO 3.10.3 remain unchanged and will continue to be verified by i
surveillance testing, the controls on reactor core parameters in l
effect during low power physics testing remain unchanged, and there is no reduction in the margin of safety.
1
- -