05000325/LER-1980-073-03, /03L-0:on 801122,RHR Flow Indicator Signal Converter 1-E11-FY-3338 Would Not Respond to Input Signal. Caused by Remote Shutdown Panel RHR Sys Flow Indicator 1-E11-FI-3338 Loading Converter to Give Inaccurate Response

From kanterella
(Redirected from ML19340D371)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
/03L-0:on 801122,RHR Flow Indicator Signal Converter 1-E11-FY-3338 Would Not Respond to Input Signal. Caused by Remote Shutdown Panel RHR Sys Flow Indicator 1-E11-FI-3338 Loading Converter to Give Inaccurate Response
ML19340D371
Person / Time
Site: Brunswick 
Issue date: 12/19/1980
From: Tollison A
CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
Shared Package
ML19340D369 List:
References
LER-80-073-03L-01, LER-80-73-3L-1, NUDOCS 8012300433
Download: ML19340D371 (2)


LER-1980-073, /03L-0:on 801122,RHR Flow Indicator Signal Converter 1-E11-FY-3338 Would Not Respond to Input Signal. Caused by Remote Shutdown Panel RHR Sys Flow Indicator 1-E11-FI-3338 Loading Converter to Give Inaccurate Response
Event date:
Report date:
3251980073R03 - NRC Website

text

U. S. NUCLE A3 CEGULATORY COMMISSION CRC FO2%t 368 87 779 O

LICENSEE EVENT REPORT CONTROL BLOCK-l I

l I

l (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE ALL REQUIRED INFORMAftON) fo TT1 I si ci al t! vi li@l 0101 -l 01010101 O l-1010 !Gl e.11 f i l 11 i fGI I

f@

P 8 9 LICENSEE CODE 14 ft LICENSE NwYs1H 26

.6 LICEN>E TY PE JG S3 LAT bd lolil TRC, IL @l015101-l0131215 @l11112l2181Ol@lil2lil91810l@

CON'T 3

%d oJ EVENT DATE J4

?S REPORT DATE 83 7

8 64 61 COCK ET NUnggR EVENT DESCRIPTION AND PROBA8LE CONSEQUENCES l During the performance of Remote Shut own RHR System Flow Calibration, P.T. 55.8PC, l

go,2, l the RHR flow indicator signal converter, li-Ell-FY-3338, Moore Industries. Incorp.,

l

- o 3 g o,,, l Model No. SRT-/4-20/1-5/45 STD, would not respond to an input signal. Similar events l involving this instrumentation have been reported in LER's 1-79-84, 1-80-47, and l

o s I [77g-} l 1-80-69.

This event did not affect the health or safety of the public.

l I

Io I 7I I Technical Specifications 3.3.5.2, 6.9.1.9b l

- o,a,l 80 SYSTEM

CAUSE

CAUSE COMP.

VALVE C00E CODE SUSCCOE COMPONENT CODE SUSCCDE SU8CCDE FTTl I il cl@ Laj@ l c l@ It in is IT la lu l@ US W @

7 8

9 10 11 12 f2 18 Id 20 SEQUENTIAL OCCURRENCE RE,CRT REVISION LER mo EVENT YE4R R EPORT No.

CODE TYPE No, "f

lg lg l l g l7 l3 l lg lg l

_2f 22 JJ 24 46 27 IS 29 34 31 32 gy K N AC CN GN PLANT VE hours 58 i FOR 8.

SUPPLI E VANUFAC RER [C_j@l 2 l@

l2l@

W@

l0l 0l Of Of l Yl@

l Y[Q lN l@

l S l 1l 81 5l@

JJ J4 JS 36 31 40 41 42 4J 44 47 CAUSE DESCRIPTION AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS ITTTI I An investigation revealed that Renote Shutdown panel RHR Svstem flow indicator 1-E11-l Model No. 1151, was loading the signal con-I W l FI-3338. Siz-a International Instru=ent, The flow indicator movement l l verter such that the indicator response was inaccurate.

, 2 g ] was replaced with a direct replacement and the flow indication loop was successfully l

l l calibrated and returned to service.

i A So 7

8 9

$A J

% POWER OTl4ER STATUS 015 C RY DITCoVERY CESCRIPTION NA l

lBl@l Periodic Test l

l Fl@ l 0 l 4 l 8 lhl i 5 AEnviTv CO0 TENT AMOUNT OF ACTivtTY LOCATION OF RELEASE NA l

l NA l

RELE ASED@OF

  • ELE ASEgl i 6

,ER,c~NEl E x, osse oEsCR,PT,0~@

~uo8 E R T,,E "A

I 101 01 01@LZJ@l i 7

'4Es l@etsCRiPTioN@

,E RseNNE L,NJU NA l

~wS E R 1 01 010 i a 80 8.

i, u

LOSS OF On oAYAGE TO FACILITY NA l

TYPE D E SCRIP TION lZl@l i 9 80 7

9 4 10

""c "5' ""

,ssuE @l#s'CR.PT,;~ @

3012 aoo % g NA l

lllllllllllllj 2 o G8 69 80 7.

7 8 9 10 919-457-9521

{

PHONE:

uaugopPnEPARER

1 1.ER ATT/OIENT - RO # 1-80-73 Facility: BSEP Unit No. 1 Event Date: 11-22-80 i

This event occurred as a result of the previous replacement of the indicator

=eter move =ent,=odel No. 1151-VB-1-5 =a DC, with a modified =eter move =ent of st=ilar specifications until the receipt of a direct replace =ent fro = the manuf acturer (LER l-80-69). The te=porary meter =ove=ent, =edel No.1151-VB-4-20 =a DC, had undergone the following =odifications at the ti=e it was in-stalled: a 247.5 oh=,1%,.25 WATT range resistor installed in series with the =eter movement inside the =eter case. However, as was later discovered as a result of this modification, the i=pedance of the modified =eter was too low and caused loading of the =eter square root converter. The te=po-rarily installed =eter and the =eter square root converter =et the calibra-l tion require =ents of PT 55.SPC following its installation, but due to the lower input i=pedance of the =odified =eter, a higher-than-normal current output fro = the =eter square root converter resulted, which caused a de-gradation in converter perfor=ance over the period of ti=e the te=porary movement was in service. At the ti=e of this event, the direct replace =ent move =ent for this =eter had recently arrived and was, therefore, installed, calibrated and returned to nor=al service. To prevent any future si=ilar events of this nature, the =aintenance engineer involved has been counselled on the necessity for thorough review of equip =ent characteristics prior to sub=itting repair procedures for approval. Flow loop 1-Ell-F1-3338, which is nor= ally calibrated on a quartcrly basis, will be calibrated =onthly for the next three months to ensure the proper operation of this instrument.

9 4