text
v-
- ~,,
i' [.
d t...f, W'
i g.
s-
~
F
. Carolina Power & Light Company.
.l
+
Brunswick Nuclear Project-J 4
P. O. Box 10429
.g
~
~
'Southport, NC: 28461-0429l February 1, 1990-i s
FILE: B09-13510C 10CFR50.73 SERIAL:
BSEP/90-0084
- i U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
'A1TN: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555' BRUNSWICK STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT UNIT 1 j
DOCKET NO. 50-325 LICENSE NO.'DPR-71 LICENSEE EVENT REPORT 1-90-001 y-
. Gentlemen:
In accordance with Title 10 to the Code of Federal Regulations, the enclosed
'j s
- - Licensee Event Report is submitted. This report fulfills the requirement for 1
a written report within thirty (30) days of a reportable occurrence and is in
~
accordance with the format set forth in NUREG-1022, September 1983.
Very truly yours, (f
J. L. Harness, General Manager-l' Brunswick Nuclear Project TMJ/mcg i
Enclosure cc:
Mr. S. D. Ebneter Mr. E. G. Tourigny BSEP NRC Resident Office 4
q..
PR DOC 0
I
'C y
b m
v
,,AC,.,,,,
UuMCLua a,Uun,RT Co.-
.oN N
A,,r.oyso oM.
3, t Kh7 4 6 4/300 ^
t81#M ATED DUIDEN Ef 2 ElSPON58 TO COMPLT ffTM THl$
l'fuMiS'U&.?D,'No'. Mo"& f#iL5'T3.E Rie%s uCENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)
AND REPORT $ MANAGtMENT ORANCH IP43ol U S NvCLt AR P AP E RINO RED T I'ON JC 43
$0 iC Of MANAGEMtNT AND DVDGE1,YrASH8NCYON.DC 30603 PAC 6LITY leatet 01 DOCR41 tsunseth up Paar m Brunswick Steam Electric Plant Unit 1 0 l5 l0 jo l0l 3l2 l 5 1 jorl 0l 3 787*' Coincident Inoperability of HPCI and RCIC Placing Unit 1 in Tech. Spec. 3.0.3 for Two Minutes caused by Personnel Error While Researching a' Clearance SVONT DATS (98 LlR 86UhlDim 16)
RSPORT Daf t 176 OTHth p Acettitt8 terv0LV60 51 MONT H DAY YEAR YEAR QQ,
' "*lM MONT H DAY vtAR
' AC' Lit s Nauss Docnti NvMetRisi j
0l5l0l0l0l l l 0l1 0l2 9 0 9l0 0l0 l1 0l0 0l2 0 l1 9l0 0l5l0 1 0;0; l l
~
~
T as ALPORT = sveMmtD evRevANT tD ful RaouiREMENn or so C R 5 <C,-.
.< ea, e u + nu i
"o** *
- 1 m esam n eni.i ioni.iun i nnw
]
j sonwun.i tuu.i n esswnmi eo mwns 1l 0 l0 gnEgungAg mes.wnni eo mmui ee nwan,
n.,
t X_
m esewnn eenwoni uni.nsn.mnAi m ai x.assenw.i eenmanni sen.nsu nsi m anwn n.
l un ninmi eenwan.i Lect 8sBEt CONTACT POR THet Lim 112 Niut TELtPMONE Nubstm ARta CODS T. M. Jones, Regulatory Compliance Specialist 9 l1l9 4lSl7 l-l2l0l3l9 COMPLETE ONE LINE FOR B ACM COtIPONENT F AILURE DitCRISED IN THIS REPORT H31
"$'g R{0NPR s' MAN [AC R PORTA 0 AC
CAUSE
tvSTEM COMPONE N T CAU51 8V818M COMPONterf y
pq 4
l l
1 1 I I l l I i
1 I i l 1 I l
l 1 l l l 1 l
l l l l l l SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT EXPECTED Het MONTH DAY vtAR
.v..u.oN
^ " " *
"""'l vti m r. -. swCiro sveuiw0N oars, T}No l
l l
AneTRACTto-,e.>=
..,a,
.y.
<.er -,..
,o,
(
On January 2, 1990, the Unit I reactor was operating at 100*. power.
RCIC was l
removed from service.
!!PCI, ADS, CS, and LPCI systems were operable in standby readiness.
At 1542 IIPCI was rendered inoperable for approximately two minutes which placed the unit in Technical Specification 3.0.3.
The cause of l
the event was personnel error on the part of a Senior Reactor Operator who failed to research plant drawings in accordance with the Equipment Clearance Procedure. The failure resulted in the circuit breaker which supplies power to the llPCI inverter being opened under a clearance for RCIC. The circuit has both llPCI and RCIC loads. The involved SRO was counseled, a memo was written q
to licensed personnel highlighting the requirements of the Equipment Clearance Procedure, clearances are currently being researched separately by two NRC i:
licensed personnel and compared for discrepancies prior to approval. This event had minimal safety significance.
9 NRC F.rm 384 (659)
rgA m r.ry.w ws.4 w.wr.sisc w r
Exeints vsom.
!",75,",'o',#^ZMg',$'/ll,'jg L",' Wln gia"^'&,J,vgg,;Gos'g"v ',,%cf'",,y,g.",'"g 5
UCENSEE EVENT CEPORT ILER)
R TEXT CINTINUATILN WJ W,?."'Ji"O'u % "'!;lDil?'i n M Mia?-
~
et MANAGE MENT AND tuD0ti,,A$HiNGTON. DC 30603
- AClutY 884484 Hi DOCEST NURSER (3)
LOR NURAS4R tel.
PAOf tal vsa"
"$Ud'."
E*.?
Brunswick Steam-Electric Plant Unit 1 0l0l1 0l 0 0l2 0F 0 l3 0 l5 l0 jo l0 l3 l 2l5 9l0 text a e==w.
. ass-w awe a.= asuwim t
Event Coincident inoperability of the High Pressure Coolant Injection (llPCI/E41)
(rIIS/BJ) and Reactor Core Isolation Cooling (RCIC/E51) (EIIS/BN) systems.
I_njtial Conditions n
The Unit I reactor was operating at 100*4 power. The RCIC system was removed from service for mal'.tenance under Limiting Condition for Operetion (LCO)
Al-89-2341. The HPCI system, the Automatic Depressurization. System (ADS)
(EI.TS/*), the A and B Core Spray (CS) (EIIS/BM) system and the A.and B Residual llent Removal / Low Pressure Coolant Injection (RHR/LPCI/ Ell) (EIIS/BO) systems were operable in standby readiness.
Equipment cicarance 1-0002 was being hung on the RCIC system.
Event Description
On January 2, 1990, clearance 1-0002 was being hung to replace the RCIC Supply L
Drain Pot Inboard Drain Valve (EIIS/DN/DRN/V), 1-E 1+V57, body to bonnet gasket.
l At 1542 the 125 volt direct current (vdc) distribut wa panel 3A circuit breaker i
number 2 (EIIS/EI/PL/bRR) was deenergized to remove power to the RCIC Steam Supply Drain Pot Drain valve, 1-E51-F025 (EIIS/BN/DRN/V).
When the circuit breaker was opened power was also removed from the HPCI steam supply drain valves and annunciation was received in the Control Room [1-A-1 l
(2-5) on panel P601) (EIIS/ ANN) indicating that the power to the llPCI inverter (EIIS/BJ/INVT) had been lost.
(Loss of the inverter resulted in the loss of l~
HPCI flow control capability.) The circuit breaker was closed and power was restored to the inverter at approximately 1544.
This event resulted in Unit 1 HPCI being inoperable and being unabic to meet i
the ACTION requirement of Technical Specification (T/S) 3.7.4, which placed the unit in T/S 3.0.3 for approximately two minutes.
LCO Al-90-0001 was initiated and canceled to document the applicability of T/S LCO 3.0.3.
Past similar events include LER 1-89-015, 1-89-008, 2-89-015, 2-89-016.
Event Investigation On December 27, 1989, a clearance was requested on the 1-E51-V57 valve to replace the body to bonnet gasket in accordance with work request and job order (WR/J0) 89-AXUII. The clearance was developed by a Senior Reactor Operator (SRO) in the Clearance Center on January 1, 1990. Contrary to Section 5.3.3.8 of the Equipment Clearance Procedure [ Administrative
- EIIS component identifier not found.
l NaC r senA um.
g.
A.
eu Noem..w o 4* - * * "
a ciaas ct3042 LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)-
f,@*,,$llo*,uagdGof;' 53"j',,' %c, "l,,7,'y,",.1"'s c
TEXT CSNTINUATION -
jiyA' ",yd,P,^,ZM,"J ',",,j'd',", W37 L",' g#n Wi"t#a".TJ M a'a a',M aiC?'h?.*J'& 0?,1?
07 WANAGEWINT AND DVDGli n A$MINGTON.DC 20603 f ACILITY tsAast (tp DOCKt1 NUndttRlia Lt h,sv.ISS A 101 PAGE(31 "n'.W.
"'J.*.70
)
- iaa Brunswick Steam Electric Plant Unit 1 l-von m
=
w,.swe.wune r as mun Instruction (AI) 58), applicable plant drawings were not utilized to identify the equipment loads off of the power supply to the 1-E51-F025 which was required to be deenergized for work on the V57 valve.
Instead, the RCIC operating procedure (0P.-16) was utilized. The OP Indicated that the power supply was circuit breaker two of 125 Vdc distribution panel 3A.
It also Indicated that this circuit powered the, RCIC Condensate Pump Discharge Outboard Drain Valve to the Main Condenser (EIIS/BN/DRN/V), 1-E51-F005.
Belleving that the OP was complete, the SRO researchir.g the clearance did not reference plant drawings and consequently f ailed to identify the !!PCI equipment' loads powered from the same breaker.
Root Cause The cause of this event was personnel error on the part of the involved SR0; failure to research plant drawings in accordance with the Equipment Clearance Procedure. A lluman Performance Evaluation was performed which determined that the SRO had used this process in the past for clearance development.
Corrective Actions
The involved SRO has b,een counseled.
A memorandum was, written from the Operations Manager to 1,1 censed Personnel highlighting the requirement in AI-58 to research plant drawings and not rely on Operating Procedures when researching a clearance.
As a result of this event, standing instruction 90-003 was' issued. The y
instruction dictates that clearances be separately researched and written by l
two NRC licensed individuals if they are on systems which require independent verification (i.e., systems indicated in Administrative Procedure Volume 1 Book 1, Table 11.7.1).
After each individual finalizes the clearance they are compared. Any_ existing dif ferences are resolved prior to authoriz.ing the clearance to be placed. This requirement is to be included in the next revision of Ale 58 which is. expected to be complete by February 28, 1990. The requirement will remain until management decides it is no longer appropriate.
Event Assessment This event had minimal safety significance because of the immediate awareness of the event and its short duration (i.e., approximately two minutes).
A similar occurrence under other reasonable and credible circumstances would not have been more severe because possible involved safety related equipment is designed to either actuate in the fall safe direction or provide a warning o
L annunciation.
N.C Fenn 3e6A (649)
|
|---|
|
|
| | | Reporting criterion |
|---|
| 05000325/LER-1990-001, :on 900102,RCIC Removed from Svc & HPCI Rendered Inoperable,Placing Unit in Tech Spec 3.0.3.Caused by Personnel Error.Individual Counseled & Standing Instruction 90-003 Issued |
- on 900102,RCIC Removed from Svc & HPCI Rendered Inoperable,Placing Unit in Tech Spec 3.0.3.Caused by Personnel Error.Individual Counseled & Standing Instruction 90-003 Issued
| | | 05000324/LER-1990-001-03, :on 900210,determined That Core Spray Loops a & B Inoperable Due to Missed Surveillance.Cause Not Stated. Investigation Continuing |
- on 900210,determined That Core Spray Loops a & B Inoperable Due to Missed Surveillance.Cause Not Stated. Investigation Continuing
| | | 05000324/LER-1990-001, :on 900210,determined That Core Spray Loops a & B Inoperable Due to Missed Surveillance.Caused by Lack of Formal Guidelines.Instructions Issued to Personnel |
- on 900210,determined That Core Spray Loops a & B Inoperable Due to Missed Surveillance.Caused by Lack of Formal Guidelines.Instructions Issued to Personnel
| | | 05000325/LER-1990-002-01, :on 900127,common Control Bldg HVAC Sys Isolated & Transferred to Recirculation Mode as Result of Spurious Actuation of Chlorine Detector.Sensor Connection Checked |
- on 900127,common Control Bldg HVAC Sys Isolated & Transferred to Recirculation Mode as Result of Spurious Actuation of Chlorine Detector.Sensor Connection Checked
| | | 05000324/LER-1990-002-02, :on 900224,Group I Isolation Occurred When Undervoltage Relay Replaced.Caused by Lack of Recognition of Significance of Having Turbine Reset While Performing Electro Hydraulic Control Evolutions |
- on 900224,Group I Isolation Occurred When Undervoltage Relay Replaced.Caused by Lack of Recognition of Significance of Having Turbine Reset While Performing Electro Hydraulic Control Evolutions
| | | 05000324/LER-1990-003, :on 900312,full Group 1 Isolation Signal Received,Resulting in Automatic Closure of Msivs.Caused by Personnel Failing to Follow Procedures.Personnel Counseled & Procedure Separated Into Two Tests |
- on 900312,full Group 1 Isolation Signal Received,Resulting in Automatic Closure of Msivs.Caused by Personnel Failing to Follow Procedures.Personnel Counseled & Procedure Separated Into Two Tests
| | | 05000325/LER-1990-003-02, :on 900302,HPCI Sys Declared Inoperable to Stop Leak on Steam Supply Drain Line.Caused by Severe Steam Erosion at 90 Degree Elbow.Involved Section of Piping Replaced on Units 1 & 2 |
- on 900302,HPCI Sys Declared Inoperable to Stop Leak on Steam Supply Drain Line.Caused by Severe Steam Erosion at 90 Degree Elbow.Involved Section of Piping Replaced on Units 1 & 2
| | | 05000324/LER-1990-003-03, :on 900312,closure of Main Steam Line Isolation Valves Occurred.Caused by Failure to Reset Half Scram Signal on Channel a Prior to Continuing Test on Channel B of Associated Instrumentation |
- on 900312,closure of Main Steam Line Isolation Valves Occurred.Caused by Failure to Reset Half Scram Signal on Channel a Prior to Continuing Test on Channel B of Associated Instrumentation
| | | 05000324/LER-1990-004-02, :on 900313,manual Reactor Scram Initiated Due to Failure of Safety/Relief Valve to Close During Startup Testing.Caused by Failure of Solenoid Valve.Valve Replaced |
- on 900313,manual Reactor Scram Initiated Due to Failure of Safety/Relief Valve to Close During Startup Testing.Caused by Failure of Solenoid Valve.Valve Replaced
| | | 05000325/LER-1990-004-03, :on 900322,injector Piping Failed on Chlorinator 5 Due to Improper Bonding of Piping.Caused by Sudden Separation of Chlorine Assembly at Junction of Reducing Bushing & Flange Adapter |
- on 900322,injector Piping Failed on Chlorinator 5 Due to Improper Bonding of Piping.Caused by Sudden Separation of Chlorine Assembly at Junction of Reducing Bushing & Flange Adapter
| | | 05000324/LER-1990-005-03, :on 900514,unplanned Closure of HPCI Isolation Valve Occurred During Maint Surveillance Test.Caused by Technician Placing RCIC Instead of HPCI Test Switch to Test Position.Personnel Counseled & Trained |
- on 900514,unplanned Closure of HPCI Isolation Valve Occurred During Maint Surveillance Test.Caused by Technician Placing RCIC Instead of HPCI Test Switch to Test Position.Personnel Counseled & Trained
| | | 05000325/LER-1990-005-02, :on 900330,Clearance F-2-90-F0096 Placed on Makeup Water Treatment Bldg Sprinkler Sys W/O Meeting Requirements of Tech Spec 3.7.7.2.Oversight Caused by Personnel Error.Fire Watch Established |
- on 900330,Clearance F-2-90-F0096 Placed on Makeup Water Treatment Bldg Sprinkler Sys W/O Meeting Requirements of Tech Spec 3.7.7.2.Oversight Caused by Personnel Error.Fire Watch Established
| | | 05000325/LER-1990-006, :on 900426,hydraulic Perturbation Occurred Causing Reactor Bldg Ventilation Sys to Isolate.Caused by Air in Transmitters During Flushing of Instrument.Procedure Revs Initiated to Change Valving Process |
- on 900426,hydraulic Perturbation Occurred Causing Reactor Bldg Ventilation Sys to Isolate.Caused by Air in Transmitters During Flushing of Instrument.Procedure Revs Initiated to Change Valving Process
| | | 05000325/LER-1990-006-02, :on 900426,hydraulic Perturbation Occurred on Variable Leg of Instrumentation Used to Sense Reactor Water Level,Causing Isolation of RWCU Sys & Initiation of Standby Gas Treatment Sys.Diaphragm Assembly Recalibr |
- on 900426,hydraulic Perturbation Occurred on Variable Leg of Instrumentation Used to Sense Reactor Water Level,Causing Isolation of RWCU Sys & Initiation of Standby Gas Treatment Sys.Diaphragm Assembly Recalibr
| | | 05000324/LER-1990-006-01, :on 900604,hydraulic Perturbation of Reactor Vessel Resulted in Isolation of RWCU Sys.Caused by Increased Differential Pressure.Operations Personnel Restored Affected Sys to Svc |
- on 900604,hydraulic Perturbation of Reactor Vessel Resulted in Isolation of RWCU Sys.Caused by Increased Differential Pressure.Operations Personnel Restored Affected Sys to Svc
| | | 05000325/LER-1990-007-01, :on 900511,identified That Damper Would Fail to Close on Loss of Power to Solenoid Valve & on 900526,damper Found Approx 30 Degrees Open.Caused by Failure of Design to Include Fail Safe Damper.Damper Modified |
- on 900511,identified That Damper Would Fail to Close on Loss of Power to Solenoid Valve & on 900526,damper Found Approx 30 Degrees Open.Caused by Failure of Design to Include Fail Safe Damper.Damper Modified
| | | 05000325/LER-1990-007, :on 900511,identified That Emergency Air Filtration Sys Inlet Damper 2L-D-CB Would Fail to Close on Loss of Power to Damper Solenoid Valve.Caused by Inadequate Damper Design.Damper Secured & Mod Implemented |
- on 900511,identified That Emergency Air Filtration Sys Inlet Damper 2L-D-CB Would Fail to Close on Loss of Power to Damper Solenoid Valve.Caused by Inadequate Damper Design.Damper Secured & Mod Implemented
| 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition | | 05000324/LER-1990-007-03, :on 900724,unit HPCI Sys Received Three Isolations of Outboard Valve.Caused by Loose Wire Landing on Terminal of Temp Module.Loose Wire Tightened.Request Made to Have Engineering Evaluate Adequacy of Design |
- on 900724,unit HPCI Sys Received Three Isolations of Outboard Valve.Caused by Loose Wire Landing on Terminal of Temp Module.Loose Wire Tightened.Request Made to Have Engineering Evaluate Adequacy of Design
| | | 05000325/LER-1990-008-02, :on 900514,HPCI Sys Rendered Inoperable When Control Power Lost to Min Flow Bypass Valve to Suppression Pool.Probably Caused by Design Problem W/Ge Model CR2940 Sockets.Light Bulb & Fuse Replaced |
- on 900514,HPCI Sys Rendered Inoperable When Control Power Lost to Min Flow Bypass Valve to Suppression Pool.Probably Caused by Design Problem W/Ge Model CR2940 Sockets.Light Bulb & Fuse Replaced
| | | 05000324/LER-1990-008-03, :on 900816,reactor Automatically Shutdown on Turbine Stop Valve Fast Closure Reactor Protection Sys Trip Signal.Caused by Failure of Primary Power Fuse C32-F5.Fuse Replaced |
- on 900816,reactor Automatically Shutdown on Turbine Stop Valve Fast Closure Reactor Protection Sys Trip Signal.Caused by Failure of Primary Power Fuse C32-F5.Fuse Replaced
| | | 05000325/LER-1990-009-01, :on 900507,determined That Tech Spec 4.6.1.1 Requirements Not Met After Performing Monthly Periodic Test 2.2.4a.Caused by Inadequate Procedure.Recommended Procedure Revs to Prevent Recurrence Being Evaluated |
- on 900507,determined That Tech Spec 4.6.1.1 Requirements Not Met After Performing Monthly Periodic Test 2.2.4a.Caused by Inadequate Procedure.Recommended Procedure Revs to Prevent Recurrence Being Evaluated
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) 10 CFR 50.73(s)(2) | | 05000324/LER-1990-009-03, :on 900819,ESF Actuation/Rps Trip Occurred While Performing Surveillance Test on Condenser Low Vacuum Instrumentation & Isolation Logic.Caused by Personnel Error. Maint Surveillance Tests Reperformed |
- on 900819,ESF Actuation/Rps Trip Occurred While Performing Surveillance Test on Condenser Low Vacuum Instrumentation & Isolation Logic.Caused by Personnel Error. Maint Surveillance Tests Reperformed
| | | 05000324/LER-1990-010-02, :on 900822,reactor Protection Sys Bus a Deenergized During Cold Shutdown.Caused by Personnel Error. Operators Disciplined & Clearance Procedure Will Be Revised to Clarify Double/Independent Verification |
- on 900822,reactor Protection Sys Bus a Deenergized During Cold Shutdown.Caused by Personnel Error. Operators Disciplined & Clearance Procedure Will Be Revised to Clarify Double/Independent Verification
| | | 05000324/LER-1990-011, :on 900830,RWCU Sys Manually Isolated Following Receipt of RWCU Leak Hi & hi-hi Annunciators |
- on 900830,RWCU Sys Manually Isolated Following Receipt of RWCU Leak Hi & hi-hi Annunciators
| | | 05000324/LER-1990-011-02, :on 900830,RWCU Sys G31 Received Leak Hi & RWCU Leak Hi Hi Annunciators Although Actual Leak Had Not Occurred.Caused by Air in Instrument 2-G31-FT-N012 Sensing Lines.Investigation to Be Conducted |
- on 900830,RWCU Sys G31 Received Leak Hi & RWCU Leak Hi Hi Annunciators Although Actual Leak Had Not Occurred.Caused by Air in Instrument 2-G31-FT-N012 Sensing Lines.Investigation to Be Conducted
| | | 05000324/LER-1990-012, :on 900830,reactor Scram Occurred |
- on 900830,reactor Scram Occurred
| | | 05000324/LER-1990-012-02, :on 900830,Unit 2 Reactor Scram Occurred During Reactor Startup.Investigation Continuing.Level Recovered W/O Need for Safety Sys Injection & Unit Designed for Level Transient from Full Power |
- on 900830,Unit 2 Reactor Scram Occurred During Reactor Startup.Investigation Continuing.Level Recovered W/O Need for Safety Sys Injection & Unit Designed for Level Transient from Full Power
| | | 05000325/LER-1990-012-01, :on 900705,determined That 18-month Surveillance on Battery 1A-1 Exceeded Surveillance Time Interval.Probably Caused by Tech Spec Change & Rescheduling of Outage.Personnel Counseled |
- on 900705,determined That 18-month Surveillance on Battery 1A-1 Exceeded Surveillance Time Interval.Probably Caused by Tech Spec Change & Rescheduling of Outage.Personnel Counseled
| | | 05000325/LER-1990-013-01, :on 900725,containment Atmospheric Control & Containment Atmospheric Dilution Subsystem Design Does Not Meet FSAR Commitments & Design Requirements.Seven Day Tracking Condition for Operator Established |
- on 900725,containment Atmospheric Control & Containment Atmospheric Dilution Subsystem Design Does Not Meet FSAR Commitments & Design Requirements.Seven Day Tracking Condition for Operator Established
| | | 05000324/LER-1990-013-02, :on 900906,HPCI Declared Inoperable Due to Erratic Performance During Periodic Testing.Caused by Deficient Needle Valve Position.Maint Will Revise Procedures to Enhance Controls for Egr Needle Valve Adjustments |
- on 900906,HPCI Declared Inoperable Due to Erratic Performance During Periodic Testing.Caused by Deficient Needle Valve Position.Maint Will Revise Procedures to Enhance Controls for Egr Needle Valve Adjustments
| | | 05000325/LER-1990-013, :on 900725,determined That Cad/Containment Atmosphere Dilution Subsystem Design Did Not Meet FSAR Re Redundancy of Power Supply for Vaporizer Trains.Caused by Changing Regulatory Commitments.Sys Reviewed |
- on 900725,determined That Cad/Containment Atmosphere Dilution Subsystem Design Did Not Meet FSAR Re Redundancy of Power Supply for Vaporizer Trains.Caused by Changing Regulatory Commitments.Sys Reviewed
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000325/LER-1990-014-02, :on 900907,reactor Protection Sys Bus a Tripped When Electrical Protection Assembly a Opened on Underfrequency.Caused by Circuit Board Failure.Circuit Board Sent to GE for Analysis |
- on 900907,reactor Protection Sys Bus a Tripped When Electrical Protection Assembly a Opened on Underfrequency.Caused by Circuit Board Failure.Circuit Board Sent to GE for Analysis
| | | 05000324/LER-1990-014-01, :on 900908,discovered ESF Actuation - RWCU Isolation When Fuse Blew in Power Supply to Differential Flow Istrument |
- on 900908,discovered ESF Actuation - RWCU Isolation When Fuse Blew in Power Supply to Differential Flow Istrument
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000325/LER-1990-014, :on 900907,ESF/RPS Actuation Occurred When Electrical Protection Assembly 2 Opened on Under Frequency & RPS Bus a Tripped Due to Failed Circuit Board |
- on 900907,ESF/RPS Actuation Occurred When Electrical Protection Assembly 2 Opened on Under Frequency & RPS Bus a Tripped Due to Failed Circuit Board
| | | 05000324/LER-1990-015-02, :on 900927,generator Voltage Oscillations Experienced Which Resulted in Loss of Main Generator Due to Loss of Excitation.Caused by Unstable Voltage Regulator. Regulator & Circuitry Reset |
- on 900927,generator Voltage Oscillations Experienced Which Resulted in Loss of Main Generator Due to Loss of Excitation.Caused by Unstable Voltage Regulator. Regulator & Circuitry Reset
| | | 05000325/LER-1990-015-01, :on 900926,incorrect LPRM Assignment Occurred Due to Reversed Cables |
- on 900926,incorrect LPRM Assignment Occurred Due to Reversed Cables
| | | 05000325/LER-1990-016-01, :on 900917,operation Prohibited by Tech Specs During Scram Discharge Vol Maint & Surveillance Activities |
- on 900917,operation Prohibited by Tech Specs During Scram Discharge Vol Maint & Surveillance Activities
| | | 05000324/LER-1990-016-02, :on 901012,reactor Scram Occurred on Turbine Stop Valve Fast Closure Caused by Reactor High Level When Fuse Failed in Feedwater Control Sys Circuitry |
- on 901012,reactor Scram Occurred on Turbine Stop Valve Fast Closure Caused by Reactor High Level When Fuse Failed in Feedwater Control Sys Circuitry
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000324/LER-1990-017-02, :on 901023,ESF Actuation Occurred Due to Blown Fuse in Main Steam Line B & Reactor Bldg Ventilation Radiation Monitoring Power Supply B |
- on 901023,ESF Actuation Occurred Due to Blown Fuse in Main Steam Line B & Reactor Bldg Ventilation Radiation Monitoring Power Supply B
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000324/LER-1990-017, :on 901023,half Trip Signal,Half PCIS Group 1 Isolation Signal & Group 6 Isolation Occurred.Caused by Failure of Kepco Power Supply in Numac Lvps to Radiation Monitor B.Numac Lvps Replaced |
- on 901023,half Trip Signal,Half PCIS Group 1 Isolation Signal & Group 6 Isolation Occurred.Caused by Failure of Kepco Power Supply in Numac Lvps to Radiation Monitor B.Numac Lvps Replaced
| | | 05000325/LER-1990-017-01, :on 900927,high Pressure Reactor Scram Occurred While Performing Periodic Test PT-40.2.10 Due to Erroneous Procedure Guidance & Defective Turbine Stop Valve Switches |
- on 900927,high Pressure Reactor Scram Occurred While Performing Periodic Test PT-40.2.10 Due to Erroneous Procedure Guidance & Defective Turbine Stop Valve Switches
| | | 05000325/LER-1990-018-01, :on 900927,Group 6 Isolation & Standby Gas Treatment Sys Autostart Signal Received as Result of Momentary Loss of Power to Main Stack Radiation Monitor. Caused by Reactor Scram |
- on 900927,Group 6 Isolation & Standby Gas Treatment Sys Autostart Signal Received as Result of Momentary Loss of Power to Main Stack Radiation Monitor. Caused by Reactor Scram
| | | 05000324/LER-1990-018-02, :on 901123,HPCI Steam Leak Detection Channel B Logic Blew & HPCI Sys Manually Isolated.Probably Caused by Blown Fuse & Loose Wire.Relay & Fuse Replaced |
- on 901123,HPCI Steam Leak Detection Channel B Logic Blew & HPCI Sys Manually Isolated.Probably Caused by Blown Fuse & Loose Wire.Relay & Fuse Replaced
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000325/LER-1990-019, :on 901002,technician Mistakenly Placed Channel B Detector to Radiation Source,Resulting in Group 6 Valve Isolations.Caused by Personnel Error.Disciplinary Action Taken |
- on 901002,technician Mistakenly Placed Channel B Detector to Radiation Source,Resulting in Group 6 Valve Isolations.Caused by Personnel Error.Disciplinary Action Taken
| | | 05000324/LER-1990-019-02, :on 901226,isolation Signal Caused Reactor Water Cleanup Inlet Inboard Isolation Valve to Automatically Close.Caused by de-energized HPCI Isolation Relay.Riley Scam Temp Switch Units Will Be Replaced |
- on 901226,isolation Signal Caused Reactor Water Cleanup Inlet Inboard Isolation Valve to Automatically Close.Caused by de-energized HPCI Isolation Relay.Riley Scam Temp Switch Units Will Be Replaced
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000325/LER-1990-020-01, :on 901117,primary & Secondary Containment Isolation Signals Received & Standby Gas Treatment Sys auto- Started.Caused by Scan Overload on Microprocessor.Updated Microprocessor Will Be Obtained |
- on 901117,primary & Secondary Containment Isolation Signals Received & Standby Gas Treatment Sys auto- Started.Caused by Scan Overload on Microprocessor.Updated Microprocessor Will Be Obtained
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) | | 05000324/LER-1990-020-02, :on 901226,while Returning HPCI Sys to Svc, Determined That Min Flow Valve Control Power Fuse Blown, Resulting in Inoperability of Valve.Caused by Short in Indicating Light Bulb.Bulb & Fuse Replaced |
- on 901226,while Returning HPCI Sys to Svc, Determined That Min Flow Valve Control Power Fuse Blown, Resulting in Inoperability of Valve.Caused by Short in Indicating Light Bulb.Bulb & Fuse Replaced
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000325/LER-1990-021, :on 901007,diesel Generator 4 Declared Inoperable |
- on 901007,diesel Generator 4 Declared Inoperable
| | | 05000325/LER-1990-022, :on 901022,primary Containment Isolation Sys Actuation of EFCV Occurred While Performing Maint Surveillance Test |
- on 901022,primary Containment Isolation Sys Actuation of EFCV Occurred While Performing Maint Surveillance Test
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000325/LER-1990-023, :on 901022,various Isolation Valves in Group 6 Isolation Logic Found Closed Due to Failure of 1-CAC-3A Relay |
- on 901022,various Isolation Valves in Group 6 Isolation Logic Found Closed Due to Failure of 1-CAC-3A Relay
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) |
|