Letter Sequence Other |
|---|
|
Results
Other: ML19316A724, ML19343B768, ML20004B598, ML20004F967, ML20031G133, ML20041A140, ML20054L514, ML20070T323, ML20071G832, ML20072L346, ML20073T116, ML20101Q494, ML20101S600
|
MONTHYEARML19316A7241980-05-21021 May 1980
Forwards Test Rept for Environ Qualification Test of Penn Union & Marathon Terminal Blocks. Rept Satisfies Util August 1979 Commitment to Test Electrical Terminal Blocks
Project stage: Other
ML19345D0641980-11-0707 November 1980
Submits Supplemental Response to IE Bulletin 79-01B Re Pressurizer Level Transmitter LT-RC-459 Failure & Replacement Transmitter Failure.Sys Component Work Sheet Encl
Project stage: Supplement
ML19340E8351980-12-12012 December 1980
Forwards Supplemental Response to IE Bulletin 79-01B, Environ Qualification of Class IE Equipment, Identifying Procedures to Provide Addl Guidance for Coping W/Environmentally Unqualified Electrical Equipment
Project stage: Supplement
ML19343B7681980-12-19019 December 1980
Submits List of Westinghouse Documents to Be Marked as Proprietary & Removed from Pdr.Documents Also Identified in Westinghouse
Project stage: Other
ML19341A3921980-12-30030 December 1980
Summary of 801202 Meeting W/Util Re Deficiencies in Licensee Response to IE Bulletin 79-01.Agenda Encl
Project stage: Meeting
ML19347E2261981-03-12012 March 1981
Forwards Supplemental Info to 801231 Response to IE Bulletin 79-01B, Environ Qualification of Class IE Equipment. Info Provides Description of Ongoing Qualification Assurance Program
Project stage: Supplement
ML20004B5981981-04-28028 April 1981
Responds to IE Bulletin 79-01B Re Namco Limit Switches. Prototype Design Being Developed.Limit Switch Sealing Scheduled for First Outage Following Design Completion
Project stage: Other
ML20004F9671981-06-22022 June 1981
Informs That Applicant Performed Review of & Subsequent Replies ,0202,0312 & 0428 in Response to IE Bulletin 79-01B.Item-by-item re-evaluation in Detailed,Documented Manner Will Be Provided
Project stage: Other
ML20009B1061981-06-29029 June 1981
Forwards Equipment Qualification Branch Safety Evaluation for Environ Qualification of safety-related Electrical Equipment.Also Forwards Technical Evaluation of Revision 1 to Licensee Response to IE Bulletin 79-01B
Project stage: Approval
ML20031G1331981-10-15015 October 1981
Forwards Amend 1 to Environ Qualification Documentation Rept for IE Bulletin 79-01B,Vols 1 & 2,in Response to NRC 810608 Safety Evaluation Re Environ Qualification of safety- Related Electrical Equipment
Project stage: Other
ML20041A1401982-02-11011 February 1982
Advises That Info Requested in NRC Re Environ Qualification of safety-related Electrical Equipment Is Being Submitted to Franklin Research Ctr W/Ltr
Project stage: Other
ML20054L5141982-06-30030 June 1982
Forwards Updated Executive Summary,Section 1.2 of IE Bulletin 79-01B Rept.List Updated to Reflect Replacement Equipment Installed During Refueling Outage as Well as Info Re Equipment Testing & Procurement/Delivery Schedules
Project stage: Other
ML20070T3231983-02-0101 February 1983
Responds to SER for Environ Qualification of safety-related Electrical Equipment.Deficiencies Identified Will Not Impair Continued Safe Operation.Reclassification of Manufacturers Info Continuing.Justification for Continued Operation Encl
Project stage: Other
ML20072L3461983-03-25025 March 1983
Forwards Environ Qualification Documentation Rept, 90-day Response Required by NRC SER for Environ Qualification of safety-related Electrical Equipment
Project stage: Other
ML20073T1161983-05-0202 May 1983
Forwards Franklin Research Ctr Proprietary Equipment Environ Qualification Worksheets,In Response to 830329 Clarification of Environ Qualification Ser.Previous Submittals Justified Continued Operation.Worksheets Withheld (Ref 10CFR2.790)
Project stage: Other
ML20071G8321983-05-19019 May 1983
Forwards Response to 10CFR50.49 Rulemaking Re Environ Qualification of Electrical Equipment.When Master List of Equipment Is Coupled W/Recent Response to Ser,More Complete Overview Is Presented
Project stage: Other
ML20100M5211984-11-29029 November 1984
Forwards Updated Equipment Qualification Items Summary, Including Description of Methods of Environ Qualification for Each Equipment Item Discussed at 840405 Meeting,In Response to SER Re Environ Qualification
Project stage: Meeting
ML20101Q4941985-01-0202 January 1985
Informs That Actions for Resolving Environ Qualification Deficiencies for Cold Leg Safety Injection Branch Line Flow Transmitters FT-SI-961,962 & 963 Stated in 841129 Rept Will Differ.Rosemount Transmitter FT-SI-943 Installed
Project stage: Other
ML20101S6001985-01-25025 January 1985
Certifies Compliance w/10CFR50.49, Environ Qualification of Electric Equipment Important to Safety for Nuclear Power Plants, Per Generic Ltr 84-24.Certifications Do Not Apply to Reg Guide 1.97 Equipment
Project stage: Other
1981-06-29
[Table View] |
Text
. _ _ _ _
i W
M si2) 4564cco 1%5l,','l,s""
May 21, 19SO iwi Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn:
Mr. Steven A. Varga, Chief Operating Reactors Branch No. 1 Division of Licensing Washington, DC 20555
Reference:
Beaver Valley Power Station, Unit No. 1 Docket No. 50-334, License No. DPR-66 HELB and Consequential Failure of Electrical Equipment, Test Report For Environmental Qualification Test of Penn Union and Marathon Terminal Blocks Gentlemen:
Forwarded herewith are ten (10) copies of the above referenced environmental test report.
This report satisfies the commitment mad. ky Duquesne Light Company in August 1979 to test Penn Union Series 1000 and Marathon Series 1500 electrical terminal blocks.
The test consisted of evaluating the functional performance of the terminal blocks subjected to typical operating electrical loads while being subj ected to a LOCA environment.
The range of environmental parameters used was governed by applying IEEE-323-1971 and Beaver Valley Power Station, Unit No. 1 FSAR guidelines.
During the test, all of the terminal blocks demonstrated the capability to function as raquired in accordance with the acceptance criteria given.
Although all of the terminal blocks met the acceptance criteria, the reliability of the Marathon Terminal Blocks was questioned due to certain anomalies noted during the tests.
Very truly yours, C. N. Dunn Vice President, Operations Attachment Mr. D. A. Beckman, Resident Inspector cc:
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Beaver Valley Power Station
}M Shippingport, PA 15077
\\" 9 i
U.S. Nuclear Regulaterv Commission c/o Document Management 3 ranch Washington, DC 20535 B00527