ML19209A708

Interrogatories & Document Requests to Util Submitted by Intervenor Skagitonians Concerned About Nuclear Power. Includes Questions Re Basis for Design of Blowdown Flow & Silica Content of Water.Certificate of Svc Encl

ML19209A708
Person / Time
Site:	Skagit
Issue date:	08/21/1979
From:	Leed R LEED, R.M., SKAGITONIANS CONCERNED ABOUT NUCLEAR POWER (SCANP)
To:	PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT CO.
References
NUDOCS 7910050254
Download: ML19209A708 (7)

Text

-

RELATED CORRESPONDENca g4 P "9s

[r Aus2M3734d

P -

' N' .3 # W UNITED STATES OF AMERICA '

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 'Cb t ; 34A)

BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING APPEAL BOARD In the Matter of )

)

PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT ) DOCKET NOS.

COMPANY, et al., STN 50-522

)

50-523

)

)

(Skagit Nuclear Power Project, ) August 21, 1979 Units 1 and 2) )

)

)

INTERVENOR SCANP'S INTERROGATORIES TO APPLICANT TO:

APPLICANT PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT AND ITS ATTORNEYS P urs uant to 10 CFR S2.740(b), Intervenor SCANP propounds the following interrogatories to Applicant Puget Sound Power & Light, to be answered by a duly authorized officer or agent fully in writing under oath or affirmation within 14 days.

As used herein, the term " document" means all writi c Js and recordings of every type in the possession or control of Applicant or its directors, officers, members, empoyees, attorneys, consul-tants, agents or representatives, including, but not limited to, memoranda, correspondence, reports, surveys, charts, books, photographs, maps, notes, studies, drawings, writings, minutes, a notes of telephone conversations, notes of meetings or other conversations, and all other records.

1106 053 lT 791<)050 25'l nr  :

INTERROGATORY NO. 1.

With reference to pg. 9.2-48 of the P.S.A.R.,

please provide the basis for designing a blow down flow of 1400 gal./ min.

a)

Identify all documents that refer to the blow down flow ,

b)

Identify by name, address, and occupation all persons have knowledge of facts regarding design for the blow down flow .

ANSWER:

IhTERROGATORY NO. 2.

How many cycles of concentration corres-pond to this designated blow dcwn flow of 1400 gal./ min ? .

ANSKER:

r

l t

INTERROGATORY NO. 3.

Has new information with respect to to silica content of total water hardness become available s equent sub-to the signing of your Zoning Agreement with Skagit County?

(a)

Identify all water quality testing performed on the Skag 3 t River; for silica, hardness oc other parameters.

ANSWER:

INTERROGATORY NO. 4.

As a result of water quiality testing, or for any other reason, have changes been made or considered in the plan of design for a blew down flow of 1400 gal. / min . ?

a)

Identify and summarize any oral reports, decisions , or agreements made in connection with the blow dowrr flow .

(o)

Do any of the above changes, considered or actual, contradict the limitations of your zoning agreement, placed on the number of cycles of concentration?

(c) If so, ho ' do you plan to deal with th.is discrepancy?

ANSWER:

d

. j INTERROGATORY NO. 5. Please provide the design criteria for the circulating water system and make-up system including but not limited to design flows and operating temperatures.

a)

Identify all documents that refer to either the circula-ting water system or the make up system, b)

Identify by name, address, and occupation all persons having knowledge of f act.

regarding the design criteria for the circulating water system or the make up system.

c)

Identify all studies performed with respect to the cir-culating water sysdtem, including but not limited to studies of water chemistry and effects of corrosion.

ANSWER:

INTERROJ ATORY NO. 6.

Has Puget considered operating data, with respect to the ratio of blow doan flow to the evaporation rate in the cooling towersf f rom the neighboring oil refineries at Cherry Point for any other existing plants?

a) Identify any documents that refer to such operating data.

b)

Identify and summarize any oral reports, dec tions, or agreements made in connection with such data.

AN SWER:

1106 056 I.

f INTERROGATORY NO. 7 With respect to the ratio of blow down flow to the evaporacion rate in the cooling towers , has Puget considered the revised design data and/or the reasons necessitating such revision for WPPS plants 1 and 4?

a)

Identify any documents that refer to such design dat a.

ANSWER:

REQUEST POR PRODUCTION NO. 1:

Please provide copies of all documents identified in the above interrogatories .

REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO.2:

Please provide an updated flow diagram of the total plant water systens, including the blow down system, circulation water system, water system.

and the make-up DATED August _21, 1979.

Resp [ctfull sub tte ,

[s1

,,OGER M. - 'n Counsel for ervenor SCAN?

1411 Fourth Avenue Bldg.

Seattle, Washington 98101 110b Ob/

m RELATED CORRESPONDENCE h 806 2.k W" UNITED STATES OF AMERICA cp NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 03

%a BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING APPEAL BOARD In the Matter of )

)

PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT ) DOCKET NOS.

COMPANY, et al., )

STN 5 0-522

)

50-523

)

(Skagit Nuclear Power Project, ) August 21, 1979 Units 1 and 2) )

)

)

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that copies of:

INTERVENOR SCANP ' S INTERROGATORIES TO APPLICANT dated August 21, 1979, have been served on th'e following by depositing the same in the United States mail, postage prepaid, on this 21st day of August, 1979.

Valentine B. Deale, Esq. , Chairman Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Docketing and Service Section U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Office of the Secrmatary Commission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1001 Connecticu t Avenue N.W.

Washington, Washington, D.C.

D.C. 20036 :20555 Dr. Frank F. Hooper, Member Richard L. Black, IEsq.

Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Counsel for NRC S tnaf f U.S. Nuclear Regulatory School of Natural Resources Commission University of Michigan Ann Arbor, MI. 48104 Office of the Execu2tive Legal Director Gustave A. Linenberger, Member Washington, D, C. 20555 Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Nicholas D. Lewis, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Chairman Commission Energy Facility Si te Evaluation Washington, D.C. 20555 Council 820 East Fif th Avernae O lymp ia , Washington 98504 Certificate - 1 ,

i106 058

- - . . ~ k Richard M. Sandvik, Esq., Russel W. Busch Assistant Attorney General Department of Justice Evergreen Legal Services 500 Pacific Building 520 Smith Tower 520 S. W. Yamhill Seattle, Washington 98104 Portland, Oregon 97204 '

Thomas Moser Robert Lowenstein, Esq. Deputy Prosecuting Attorney Lowens tein, Newman, Reis & Skagit County Courthouse Axelrad Mt. Ve2330n, Washington 98273 1025 Connecticut Avenue, N.W.

Washignton, D.C. 20036 H. H. Phillips, Esq.

Vice President and Corporate Counsel Portland Company General Electric 121 S.W. Salmon Street Portland, Oregon 97204 CPSP and FOB E. Stachon & L. Marbet 19142 S. Bakers Ferry Road Boring, Oregon 97009 Canadian Pater Consulate General A. van Brakel Vice-Consul 412 Plaza 600 6th and S tewart S treet Seattle, Washington 98101 F. Theodore Thomsen Perkins , Coie, Stone, Olsen

& Williams 1900 Washington Building Seattle, Washington 98101 Alan P. O' Kelly Paine, Lowe, Coffin, Herman

& 0'Kel*1y 1400 Washington Trust Financial Center S pok an e, Washington o 99204 DATED- ,bwr!1/, M 77 j r

/

ROGER M/ L.EED , .

v[

g, /

% (. -

-f Certificate - 2 '

11.06 Ob9

-