Text

Enclosure 2: Absorption Coefficient for Pool Water and Reactor Building Floor Interaction, PM-1218-63882, Revision 0
	ML18362A142
Person / Time
Site:	NuScale
Issue date:	12/19/2018
From:	; NuScale
To:	; Office of New Reactors
Shared Package
ML18362A170	List: ML18362A141; ML18362A142;
References
	L0-1218-63884 PM-1218-63882-NP, Rev 0
	Download: ML18362A142 (27)
	v • d • e

L0-1218-63884 :

"Absorption Coefficient for Pool Water and Reactor Building Floor Interaction," PM-1218-63882, Revision 0, nonproprietary version NuScale Power, LLC 1100 NE Circle Blvd., Suite 200 Corvallis, Oregon 97330 Office 541.360-0500 Fax 541.207.3928 www.nuscalepower.com

NuScale Nonproprietary Absorption Coefficient for Pool Water and Reactor Building Floor Interaction Tamas Liszkai, Heqin Xu Dylan Addison, J.J. Arthur Structures and Design Analysis 12119/2018 PM-1218-63882-NP Revision: 0 Copyright 2018 by NuScale Power, LLC.

w ~!:'.~.~~.~.~-

Template#: 0000-21727-F01 R4

Outline

_* Review overall DCA seismic methodology

- Types of models

- Workflow

- Model interfaces

- High level physics

- Unique fluid-structure-interaction (FSI) considerations

Discuss limitation and conservatisms of DCA methodology regarding FSI

Discuss the basis of a reasonable approach to account for FSI in sub-structure analysis

Present results of absorption coefficient develop,ment 2

M~~.~"~.~-~r Template#: 0000-21727-F01 R4

DCA Seismic Analysis

Current methodolo gy in NuScale DCA

- provides a reasonable and conservative evaluation of seismic loads/demand

- Conforms to NRC regulatory guidelines

Many complex interfaces between building and NPM models

Unique design of u,timate heat sink provides challenge s for codes like SASSI

- Fluid structure interaction (FSI) plays significant role

- Large model size

- Deeply embedded structure

Inherent conservatism of multi-step process results in high design loads 3

M~!J.~.~~-~~-

Ternplate #: 0000-21727-F01 R4

DCA Seismic Analysis Process

Multiple Sub-modeling ((

                                                                       }}2(a),(c) 5 PM-1218-63882-NP Revision: 0      Copyright 2018 by NuScale Power, LLC.

M~!J,~J~~g-Template #: 0000-21727-F01 R4

Consequence of DCA Methodology ((

                                                                       }}2(a),(c) 6 PM-1218-63882-NP Revision: 0      Copyright 2018 by NuScale Power, LLC.

M~!,l,~.E~.~f Template#: 0000-21727-F01 R4

Soil-Library Methodology

NuScale submitted for review a fully-coupled FSSI methodology for frequency domain analysis (TR-0118-58005)
Soil impedance from SASSI + ANSY S structural model +

ANSYS equation solver and post-processing

Functionally identical to SASSI except that it overcomes the limitations associated with lack of FSI capabilities
Uses one-step dynam ic analysis for SSI of buildings, NPMs, and pool water 7

Observations using full FSSI Model ((

                                                                          }}2(a),(c) 8 PM-1218-63882-N P Revision: 0       Copyright 2018 by NuScale Power, LLC.

M~!J.li.~~-~,r Template#: 0000-21727-F01 R4

Option to Include Acoustic Fluid Damping"

Complex impedance boundary condition (BC) at the pool cut-boundary can be applied in which is the ratio between the pressure and normal particle velocity

            - Development of exact BC of this kind is cumbersome and poses many challenges due to its frequency dependent nature and location dependency

Alternatively an absorption coefficient can be used which can reasonably represent the wave dissipation at the boundary
Absorption coefficient represents how much of the waves at the boundary are being reflected vs. absorbed
NuScale developed a conservative approach to determine a reasonable absorption coefficient for seismic analysis of the NPM 9

Key Takeaways

The use of absorption coefficient is to remedy limitations associated with sub-modeling using multiple software
Seismic analysis other than.the NPM has no use for absorption coefficient, soil structure integratron and fluid pressure impact on building design is considered separately
The NPM seismic 30 FSI model uses acoustic elements to correctly account for hydrodynamic mass of pool
Acoustic pressure in absence of fluid damping has high harmonic peak which is unrealistic at resonance conditions
Employing absorption coefficient to model dissipative phenomena is a reasonable approximation when computing structural response of NPM -

Background

Acoustic Elements used for FSI in the transient seismic model
RXB present in the SASSI model but not in the transient seismic model
Acoustic surface without FSI considered "rigid wall"

           - Neumann BC

Absorption coefficient needed to account for energy absorption at acoustic element surface
No existing data available for FSI

           - Limited literature in-air data shows AC depends on material, surface, thickness, frequency, etc
           - Range from 0.01 to 0.99 12 PM-1218-63882-NP Revision: 0                          Copyright 2018 by NuScale Power, LLC.

w ~~.?.~A~.~ - Template#: 0000-21727-F01 R4

Methodology (( w

                                                                           }}2(a),(c) 13 PM-1218-63882-NP Revision: 0      Copyright 2018 by NuScale Power, LLC.
                                                                  ~!J,~.~~-~~-

Template #: 0000-21727-F01 R4

Methodology ((

                                                                         }}2(a),(c) 14 PM-1218-63882-NP Revision: O      Copyright.2018 by NuScale Power, LLC.

M~!J.~.~~-~s-Template #: 0000-21727-F01 R4

Methodology (( w

                                                                          }}2(a),(c) 15 PM-1218-63882-NP
                                                                 ~!J,~.l;;~.~f Revision: 0      Copyright 2018 by NuScale Power, LLC.

Template#: 0000-21727-F01 R4

Calculation (( w

                                                                         }}2(a),(c) 16 PM-1218-63882-NP Revision: 0       Copyright 2018 by NuScale Power, LLC.
                                                                  ~!:l.~.f.!b,'r Template#: 0000-21727-F01 R4

Calculation ((

                                                                            }}2(a),(c) 17 PM-1218-63882-NP Revision: O        Copyright 2018 by NuScale Power, LLC.

w ~!:'.~.~.~!:~. Template#: 0000-21727-F01 R4

Calculation (( \ -

                                                                              }}2(a);(c) 18 PM-1218-63882-NP Revision: 0        .Copyright 2018 by NuScale Power, LLC.

M~~.~I~~b.~- Template #: 0000-21727-F01 R4

Calculation ((

                                                                            }}2(aMc) 19 PM-1218-63882-NP Revision: a        Copyright 2018 by NuScale Power, LLC.

M~!:'.~.~~-~.r Template#: 0000-21727-F01 R4

Calculation ((

                                                                           }}2(a),(c) 20 PM-1218-63882-NP Revision: 0        Copyright 2018 by NuScale Power, LLC.

t-1 ~Y.?.~~-~.~. Template#: 0000-21727-F01 R4

Calculation- ((

                                                                             }}2(a),(c) 21 PM-1218-63882-NP Revision: 0         Copyright 2018 by NuScale Power, LLC.

w~~~-~~-Hr Template#*. 0000-21727-F01 R4

Calculation (( /

                                                                              }}2(a),(c) 22 PM-1218-63882-NP Revision: 0        Copyright 2018 by NuScale Power, LLC.

M~Y.~.f.!.~!§- Template #: 0000-21727-F01 R4

Calculation ((

                                                                            }}2(a),(c) 23 PM-1218-63882-NP Revision: O        Copyright 2018 by NuScale Power, LLC.

W!'!Y.~.f.~-~r Template#: 0000-21727-F01 R4

Calculation ((

                                                                            }}2(a),(c) 24 PM-1218-63882-NP Revision: 0       Copyright 2018 by NuScale Power, LLC.

w !'!!;'.~-~~-~.~ - Template#: 0000-21727-F01 R4

Conclusion

Iterative process to determine absorption coefficient that matches the response of the NPM at key locations with and without the surrounding building
Absorption coefficient of 0.7 generates similar peak responses independent of NPM location
For added conservatism a value of 0.4 is used for NPM analysis 25 PM-1218-63882-NP Revision: O Copyright 2018 by NuScale Power, LLC.

M~!J,~"~!-~s Template#: 0000-21727-F01 R4

Portland Office Richland Office 6650 SW Redwood Lane, 1933 Jadwin Ave., Suite 130 Suite 210 Richland, WA 99354 Portland, OR 97224 541.360.0500 971.371. 1592 Arlington Office Corvallis Office 2300 Clarendon Blvd., Suite 1110 1100 NE Circle Blvd., Suite 200 Arlington, VA 22201 Corvallis, OR 97330 541.360.0500 London Office 1st Floor Portland House Rockville Office Bressenden Place 11333 Woodglen Ave., Suite 205 London SW1 E 5BH Rockville, MD 20852 United Kingdom 301.770.0472 +44 (0) 2079 321700 Charlotte Office 2815 Coliseum Centre Drive, Suite 230 Charlotte, NC 28217 980.349.4804 http://www.nuscalepower.com "I Twitter: @NuScale_ Power NUSCALE' Power for all humankind 26 PM-1218-63882-NP Revision: 0 Copyright 2018 by NuScale Power, LLC. W~!J.~"~~-~.r Template#: 0000-21727-F01 R4}}

ML18362A142

Text

Background

Navigation menu

Search