|
---|
Category:Report
MONTHYEARML23192A4472023-07-31031 July 2023 Staff Assessment of Updated Seismic Hazards at TVA Sites Following the NRC Process for the Ongoing Assessment of Natural Hazards Information ML23025A0752023-01-25025 January 2023 American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Section XI, Third 10 Year Inspection Interval, Inservice Inspection, System Pressure Test, Containment Inspection, and Repair and Replacement Programs, Owners Activity Report Cycle . ML22363A3922022-12-28028 December 2022 Cycle 14 Mellla+ Eigenvalue Tracking Data CNL-22-090, Request to Use a Later Edition of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Operation and Maintenance Code and Alternative Requests for the Fifth Inservice Testing Interval2022-12-12012 December 2022 Request to Use a Later Edition of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Operation and Maintenance Code and Alternative Requests for the Fifth Inservice Testing Interval CNL-22-100, to Request for License Amendment Regarding Application of Advanced Framatome Methodologies, and Adoption of TSTF-564 Revision 2 for Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant Units 1, 2, and 3,in Support of Atrium 11 Fuel Use at Browns Ferry (TS-535)2022-12-0909 December 2022 to Request for License Amendment Regarding Application of Advanced Framatome Methodologies, and Adoption of TSTF-564 Revision 2 for Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant Units 1, 2, and 3,in Support of Atrium 11 Fuel Use at Browns Ferry (TS-535) CNL-22-066, Request for License Amendment Regarding Application of Advanced Framatome Methodologies, and Adoption of TSTF-564 Revision 2 for in Support of Atrium 11 Fuel Use Supplement 3, Response to Request for Additional Information2022-07-18018 July 2022 Request for License Amendment Regarding Application of Advanced Framatome Methodologies, and Adoption of TSTF-564 Revision 2 for in Support of Atrium 11 Fuel Use Supplement 3, Response to Request for Additional Information ML22154A4042022-06-0303 June 2022 Unit 3 Cycle 20 Mellla+ Eigenvalue Tracking Data CNL-22-057, to Request for License Amendment Regarding Application of Advanced Framatome Methodologies, and Adoption of TSTF-564 Revision 2 in Support of Atrium 11 Fuel Use2022-05-27027 May 2022 to Request for License Amendment Regarding Application of Advanced Framatome Methodologies, and Adoption of TSTF-564 Revision 2 in Support of Atrium 11 Fuel Use ML21277A1232021-10-0404 October 2021 Submittal of Browns Ferry Unit 2 Reactor Pressure Vessel Vertical Weld Flaw Evaluation ML21246A2942021-09-29029 September 2021 Enclosufinal Ea/Fonsi for Tva'S Initial and Updated Triennial Decommissioning Funding Plans for Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant ISFSIs ML21246A2952021-09-29029 September 2021 Memo to File CNL-20-102, 10 CFR 71.95 Report for 3-60B Casks User2020-12-16016 December 2020 10 CFR 71.95 Report for 3-60B Casks User ML20255A0002020-09-24024 September 2020 Staff Review of Seismic Probabilistic Risk Assessment Associated with Reevaluated Seismic Hazard Implementation of the Near Term Task Force Recommendation 2.1: Seismic ML20112F4852020-05-0606 May 2020 Staff Assessment of Flooding Focused Evaluation CNL-19-074, Extended Power Uprate - Flow Induced Vibration Summary Report2019-09-0404 September 2019 Extended Power Uprate - Flow Induced Vibration Summary Report CNL-19-004, Tennessee Valley Authority, Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant, Unit 2, Completion of Required Action for NRC Order EA-13-109, Reliable Hardened Containment Vents Capable of Operation Under Severe Accident Conditions2019-06-0707 June 2019 Tennessee Valley Authority, Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant, Unit 2, Completion of Required Action for NRC Order EA-13-109, Reliable Hardened Containment Vents Capable of Operation Under Severe Accident Conditions CNL-19-041, Extended Power Uprate - Unit 1 Flow Induced Vibration Summary Report2019-04-16016 April 2019 Extended Power Uprate - Unit 1 Flow Induced Vibration Summary Report CNL-19-032, Proposed Technical Specifications (TS) Change TS-510 - Request for License Amendments - Maximum Extended Load Line Limit Analysis Plus - Supplement 8, Additional Operator Training Information2019-03-13013 March 2019 Proposed Technical Specifications (TS) Change TS-510 - Request for License Amendments - Maximum Extended Load Line Limit Analysis Plus - Supplement 8, Additional Operator Training Information CNL-18-134, Extended Power Uprate - Replacement Steam Dryer Revised Analysis and Limit Curves Report2018-11-29029 November 2018 Extended Power Uprate - Replacement Steam Dryer Revised Analysis and Limit Curves Report ML18283B5472018-10-10010 October 2018 Responding to Letter of 11/18/1977 from E. G. Case to G. Williams, Providing Environmental Qualification Information for Electrical Connectors in Reference of IE Bulletins 77-05 & 77-05A CNL-18-112, Extended Power Uprate - Flow Induced Vibration Summary Report2018-09-13013 September 2018 Extended Power Uprate - Flow Induced Vibration Summary Report CNL-18-060, Completion of Required Action for NRC Order EA-13-109, Reliable Hardened Containment Vents Capable of Operation Under Severe Accident Conditions2018-05-31031 May 2018 Completion of Required Action for NRC Order EA-13-109, Reliable Hardened Containment Vents Capable of Operation Under Severe Accident Conditions ML18079B1402018-02-23023 February 2018 Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant, Units 1, 2, and 3: Proposed Technical Specifications (TS) Change TS-510 - Request for License Amendments - Maximum Extended Load Line Limit Analysis Plus ML17222A3282017-09-0505 September 2017 Flood Hazard Mitigation Strategies Assessment ML17170A0732017-06-15015 June 2017 Report Pursuant to 10 CFR 71.95 (a)(3) and (B) - Failure to Follow Conditions of TN-RAM Packaging Certificate of Compliance No. 9233 ML17114A3712017-04-20020 April 2017 Errata for BWRVIP-271NP: BWR Vessel and Internals Project, Testing and Evaluation of the Browns Ferry, Unit 2, 120 Degree Capsule ML17033B1642017-02-0202 February 2017 American Society of Mechanical Engineers Section XI, Inservice Inspection, System Pressure Test, Containment Inservice Inspection, and Repair and Replacement - Cycle 11 Operation Programs ML17024A0362016-12-31031 December 2016 Operating Data Report for 2016 CNL-16-169, Proposed Technical Specifications (TS) Change TS-505 - Request for License Amendments - Extended Power Uprate (EPU) - Supplement 35, Consolidated Power Uprate Safety Analysis Report Revision2016-10-28028 October 2016 Proposed Technical Specifications (TS) Change TS-505 - Request for License Amendments - Extended Power Uprate (EPU) - Supplement 35, Consolidated Power Uprate Safety Analysis Report Revision ML16196A0882016-08-0505 August 2016 Staff Assessment of Response to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Information Request - Flood Causing Mechanism Reevaluation ML16146A0182016-05-25025 May 2016 Special Report 296/2016-001 for Inoperable Post Accident Monitoring (PAM) Instrumentation ML16028A2952016-01-29029 January 2016 10 CFR 71.95 Notification Associated with the Failure to Observe Certificate of Compliance Condition of the 8-120B Secondary Lid Test Port Configuration ML16027A0592016-01-27027 January 2016 Snubbers Added to Lnservice Testing Program ML15356A6542015-12-22022 December 2015 Submittal of 10 CFR 50.46 30-Day Report CNL-15-056, Application to Modify Technical Specification 2.1.1.2, Reactor Core Minimum Critical Power Ratio Safety Limits (TS-506)2015-09-25025 September 2015 Application to Modify Technical Specification 2.1.1.2, Reactor Core Minimum Critical Power Ratio Safety Limits (TS-506) NL-15-169, Non-Proprietary - Safety Analysis Report for Browns Ferry, Units 1, 2 and 3, Extended Power Uprate, Attachment 72015-09-21021 September 2015 Non-Proprietary - Safety Analysis Report for Browns Ferry, Units 1, 2 and 3, Extended Power Uprate, Attachment 7 ML15282A2392015-09-21021 September 2015 Flow Induced Vibration Analysis and Monitoring Program ML15282A2402015-09-21021 September 2015 Startup Test Plan NL-15-169, Browns Ferry Units 1, 2 and 3, Flow Induced Vibration Analysis and Monitoring Program2015-09-21021 September 2015 Browns Ferry Units 1, 2 and 3, Flow Induced Vibration Analysis and Monitoring Program ML15282A1812015-09-21021 September 2015 Non-Proprietary - Safety Analysis Report for Browns Ferry, Units 1, 2 and 3, Extended Power Uprate, Attachment 7 NL-15-169, Browns Ferry, Units 1, 2, and 3, Startup Test Plan2015-09-21021 September 2015 Browns Ferry, Units 1, 2, and 3, Startup Test Plan ML15254A5432015-09-11011 September 2015 Submittal of 10 CFR 72.48 Changes, Tests, and Experiments, Biennial Summary Report Associated with the Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation NL-15-169, ANP-3377NP, Browns Ferry Units 1, 2 and 3 LOCA Break Spectrum Analysis Atrium 10XM Fuel (Epu).2015-08-31031 August 2015 ANP-3377NP, Browns Ferry Units 1, 2 and 3 LOCA Break Spectrum Analysis Atrium 10XM Fuel (Epu). ML15282A2362015-08-31031 August 2015 NEDO-33824, Revision 0, Engineering Report, Browns Ferry Replacement Steam Dryer Stress Analysis. ML15282A1822015-08-31031 August 2015 ANP-3403NP, Revision 2, Fuel Uprate Safety Analysis Report for Browns Ferry Units 1, 2, and 3, Attachment 9 NL-15-169, NEDO-33824, Revision 0, Engineering Report, Browns Ferry Replacement Steam Dryer Stress Analysis.2015-08-31031 August 2015 NEDO-33824, Revision 0, Engineering Report, Browns Ferry Replacement Steam Dryer Stress Analysis. ML15282A1842015-08-31031 August 2015 ANP-3377NP, Browns Ferry Units 1, 2 and 3 LOCA Break Spectrum Analysis Atrium 10XM Fuel (Epu). ML15282A1852015-08-31031 August 2015 ANP-3378NP, Browns Ferry Units 1, 2 and 3, LOCA-ECCS Analysis MAPLHGR Limits for Atrium 10XM Fuel (Epu). NL-15-169, ANP-3378NP, Browns Ferry Units 1, 2 and 3, LOCA-ECCS Analysis MAPLHGR Limits for Atrium 10XM Fuel (Epu).2015-08-31031 August 2015 ANP-3378NP, Browns Ferry Units 1, 2 and 3, LOCA-ECCS Analysis MAPLHGR Limits for Atrium 10XM Fuel (Epu). NL-15-169, ANP-3403NP, Revision 2, Fuel Uprate Safety Analysis Report for Browns Ferry Units 1, 2, and 3, Attachment 92015-08-31031 August 2015 ANP-3403NP, Revision 2, Fuel Uprate Safety Analysis Report for Browns Ferry Units 1, 2, and 3, Attachment 9 2023-07-31
[Table view] Category:Technical
MONTHYEARML23192A4472023-07-31031 July 2023 Staff Assessment of Updated Seismic Hazards at TVA Sites Following the NRC Process for the Ongoing Assessment of Natural Hazards Information ML22363A3922022-12-28028 December 2022 Cycle 14 Mellla+ Eigenvalue Tracking Data CNL-22-100, to Request for License Amendment Regarding Application of Advanced Framatome Methodologies, and Adoption of TSTF-564 Revision 2 for Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant Units 1, 2, and 3,in Support of Atrium 11 Fuel Use at Browns Ferry (TS-535)2022-12-0909 December 2022 to Request for License Amendment Regarding Application of Advanced Framatome Methodologies, and Adoption of TSTF-564 Revision 2 for Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant Units 1, 2, and 3,in Support of Atrium 11 Fuel Use at Browns Ferry (TS-535) CNL-22-066, Request for License Amendment Regarding Application of Advanced Framatome Methodologies, and Adoption of TSTF-564 Revision 2 for in Support of Atrium 11 Fuel Use Supplement 3, Response to Request for Additional Information2022-07-18018 July 2022 Request for License Amendment Regarding Application of Advanced Framatome Methodologies, and Adoption of TSTF-564 Revision 2 for in Support of Atrium 11 Fuel Use Supplement 3, Response to Request for Additional Information ML22154A4042022-06-0303 June 2022 Unit 3 Cycle 20 Mellla+ Eigenvalue Tracking Data CNL-22-057, to Request for License Amendment Regarding Application of Advanced Framatome Methodologies, and Adoption of TSTF-564 Revision 2 in Support of Atrium 11 Fuel Use2022-05-27027 May 2022 to Request for License Amendment Regarding Application of Advanced Framatome Methodologies, and Adoption of TSTF-564 Revision 2 in Support of Atrium 11 Fuel Use ML21277A1232021-10-0404 October 2021 Submittal of Browns Ferry Unit 2 Reactor Pressure Vessel Vertical Weld Flaw Evaluation CNL-20-102, 10 CFR 71.95 Report for 3-60B Casks User2020-12-16016 December 2020 10 CFR 71.95 Report for 3-60B Casks User ML20255A0002020-09-24024 September 2020 Staff Review of Seismic Probabilistic Risk Assessment Associated with Reevaluated Seismic Hazard Implementation of the Near Term Task Force Recommendation 2.1: Seismic ML20112F4852020-05-0606 May 2020 Staff Assessment of Flooding Focused Evaluation CNL-19-074, Extended Power Uprate - Flow Induced Vibration Summary Report2019-09-0404 September 2019 Extended Power Uprate - Flow Induced Vibration Summary Report CNL-19-004, Tennessee Valley Authority, Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant, Unit 2, Completion of Required Action for NRC Order EA-13-109, Reliable Hardened Containment Vents Capable of Operation Under Severe Accident Conditions2019-06-0707 June 2019 Tennessee Valley Authority, Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant, Unit 2, Completion of Required Action for NRC Order EA-13-109, Reliable Hardened Containment Vents Capable of Operation Under Severe Accident Conditions CNL-19-041, Extended Power Uprate - Unit 1 Flow Induced Vibration Summary Report2019-04-16016 April 2019 Extended Power Uprate - Unit 1 Flow Induced Vibration Summary Report CNL-19-032, Proposed Technical Specifications (TS) Change TS-510 - Request for License Amendments - Maximum Extended Load Line Limit Analysis Plus - Supplement 8, Additional Operator Training Information2019-03-13013 March 2019 Proposed Technical Specifications (TS) Change TS-510 - Request for License Amendments - Maximum Extended Load Line Limit Analysis Plus - Supplement 8, Additional Operator Training Information CNL-18-134, Extended Power Uprate - Replacement Steam Dryer Revised Analysis and Limit Curves Report2018-11-29029 November 2018 Extended Power Uprate - Replacement Steam Dryer Revised Analysis and Limit Curves Report ML18283B5472018-10-10010 October 2018 Responding to Letter of 11/18/1977 from E. G. Case to G. Williams, Providing Environmental Qualification Information for Electrical Connectors in Reference of IE Bulletins 77-05 & 77-05A CNL-18-112, Extended Power Uprate - Flow Induced Vibration Summary Report2018-09-13013 September 2018 Extended Power Uprate - Flow Induced Vibration Summary Report ML18079B1402018-02-23023 February 2018 Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant, Units 1, 2, and 3: Proposed Technical Specifications (TS) Change TS-510 - Request for License Amendments - Maximum Extended Load Line Limit Analysis Plus ML17222A3282017-09-0505 September 2017 Flood Hazard Mitigation Strategies Assessment ML17114A3712017-04-20020 April 2017 Errata for BWRVIP-271NP: BWR Vessel and Internals Project, Testing and Evaluation of the Browns Ferry, Unit 2, 120 Degree Capsule CNL-16-169, Proposed Technical Specifications (TS) Change TS-505 - Request for License Amendments - Extended Power Uprate (EPU) - Supplement 35, Consolidated Power Uprate Safety Analysis Report Revision2016-10-28028 October 2016 Proposed Technical Specifications (TS) Change TS-505 - Request for License Amendments - Extended Power Uprate (EPU) - Supplement 35, Consolidated Power Uprate Safety Analysis Report Revision ML16196A0882016-08-0505 August 2016 Staff Assessment of Response to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Information Request - Flood Causing Mechanism Reevaluation ML16027A0592016-01-27027 January 2016 Snubbers Added to Lnservice Testing Program CNL-15-056, Application to Modify Technical Specification 2.1.1.2, Reactor Core Minimum Critical Power Ratio Safety Limits (TS-506)2015-09-25025 September 2015 Application to Modify Technical Specification 2.1.1.2, Reactor Core Minimum Critical Power Ratio Safety Limits (TS-506) ML15282A2402015-09-21021 September 2015 Startup Test Plan ML15282A2392015-09-21021 September 2015 Flow Induced Vibration Analysis and Monitoring Program NL-15-169, Non-Proprietary - Safety Analysis Report for Browns Ferry, Units 1, 2 and 3, Extended Power Uprate, Attachment 72015-09-21021 September 2015 Non-Proprietary - Safety Analysis Report for Browns Ferry, Units 1, 2 and 3, Extended Power Uprate, Attachment 7 NL-15-169, Browns Ferry, Units 1, 2, and 3, Startup Test Plan2015-09-21021 September 2015 Browns Ferry, Units 1, 2, and 3, Startup Test Plan ML15282A1812015-09-21021 September 2015 Non-Proprietary - Safety Analysis Report for Browns Ferry, Units 1, 2 and 3, Extended Power Uprate, Attachment 7 NL-15-169, Browns Ferry Units 1, 2 and 3, Flow Induced Vibration Analysis and Monitoring Program2015-09-21021 September 2015 Browns Ferry Units 1, 2 and 3, Flow Induced Vibration Analysis and Monitoring Program ML15282A1822015-08-31031 August 2015 ANP-3403NP, Revision 2, Fuel Uprate Safety Analysis Report for Browns Ferry Units 1, 2, and 3, Attachment 9 NL-15-169, ANP-3378NP, Browns Ferry Units 1, 2 and 3, LOCA-ECCS Analysis MAPLHGR Limits for Atrium 10XM Fuel (Epu).2015-08-31031 August 2015 ANP-3378NP, Browns Ferry Units 1, 2 and 3, LOCA-ECCS Analysis MAPLHGR Limits for Atrium 10XM Fuel (Epu). NL-15-169, ANP-3377NP, Browns Ferry Units 1, 2 and 3 LOCA Break Spectrum Analysis Atrium 10XM Fuel (Epu).2015-08-31031 August 2015 ANP-3377NP, Browns Ferry Units 1, 2 and 3 LOCA Break Spectrum Analysis Atrium 10XM Fuel (Epu). NL-15-169, ANP-3403NP, Revision 2, Fuel Uprate Safety Analysis Report for Browns Ferry Units 1, 2, and 3, Attachment 92015-08-31031 August 2015 ANP-3403NP, Revision 2, Fuel Uprate Safety Analysis Report for Browns Ferry Units 1, 2, and 3, Attachment 9 ML15282A2362015-08-31031 August 2015 NEDO-33824, Revision 0, Engineering Report, Browns Ferry Replacement Steam Dryer Stress Analysis. ML15282A1842015-08-31031 August 2015 ANP-3377NP, Browns Ferry Units 1, 2 and 3 LOCA Break Spectrum Analysis Atrium 10XM Fuel (Epu). ML15282A1852015-08-31031 August 2015 ANP-3378NP, Browns Ferry Units 1, 2 and 3, LOCA-ECCS Analysis MAPLHGR Limits for Atrium 10XM Fuel (Epu). NL-15-169, NEDO-33824, Revision 0, Engineering Report, Browns Ferry Replacement Steam Dryer Stress Analysis.2015-08-31031 August 2015 NEDO-33824, Revision 0, Engineering Report, Browns Ferry Replacement Steam Dryer Stress Analysis. CNL-15-143, the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) Nuclear Power Group Commercial Grade Dedication Recovery Project - Closure Report2015-07-31031 July 2015 the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) Nuclear Power Group Commercial Grade Dedication Recovery Project - Closure Report CNL-15-085, Response to NRC Request for Additional Information Regarding Proposed Technical Specification Change to Modify Technical Proposed Technical Specification Change to Modify Technical2015-06-0303 June 2015 Response to NRC Request for Additional Information Regarding Proposed Technical Specification Change to Modify Technical Proposed Technical Specification Change to Modify Technical CNL-14-208, Response to NRC Request for Additional Information Regarding the License Amendment Request to Adopt NFPA 805 Performance-Based Standard for Fire Protection for Light Water Reactor Electric Generating Plants for the Browns Ferry Nuclear Pl2014-12-17017 December 2014 Response to NRC Request for Additional Information Regarding the License Amendment Request to Adopt NFPA 805 Performance-Based Standard for Fire Protection for Light Water Reactor Electric Generating Plants for the Browns Ferry Nuclear Plan CNL-14-089, (Bfn), Units 1, 2, and 3 - Application to Modify Technical Specification 2.1.1, Reactor Core Safety Limits (BFN-TS-492)2014-12-11011 December 2014 (Bfn), Units 1, 2, and 3 - Application to Modify Technical Specification 2.1.1, Reactor Core Safety Limits (BFN-TS-492) ML14176A9612014-06-24024 June 2014 Submittal of Non-Proprietary BWROG Technical Product, BWROGTP-11-006 - ECCS Containment Walkdown Procedure, Rev 1 (January 2011), as Formally Requested During the Public Meeting Held on April 30, 2014 CNL-14-038, Tennessee Valley Authority'S Seismic Hazard & Screening Report (CEUS Sites), Response to NRC Request for Information Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Recommendation 2.1 of Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Acc2014-03-31031 March 2014 Tennessee Valley Authority'S Seismic Hazard & Screening Report (CEUS Sites), Response to NRC Request for Information Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Recommendation 2.1 of Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accid ML14077A0952014-01-30030 January 2014 BWROG-TP-14-001, Rev. 0, Containment Accident Pressure Committee (344) Task 1 - Cfd Report and Combined Npshr Uncertainty for Browns Ferry/ Peach Bottom Cvic RHR Pumps, Attachment 8 ML14077A0902013-12-31031 December 2013 BWROG-TP-13-021, Rev. 0, Containment Accident Pressure Committee (344) Task 4 - Operation in Maximum Erosion Rate Zone (Cvic Pump), Attachment 11 ML13225A5412013-12-19019 December 2013 Interim Staff Evaluation Relating to Overall Integrated Plan in Response to Order EA-12-049 (Mitigation Strategies) ML13338A6342013-12-18018 December 2013 Mega-Tech Services, LLC, Technical Evaluation Report Regarding the Overall Integrated Plan for Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant, Units 1, 2, and 3, TAC Nos.: MF0902, MF0903, and MF0904 ML13276A0642013-09-30030 September 2013 ANP-3248NP, Revision 1, Areva RAI Responses for Browns Ferry Atrium 10XM Fuel Transition, Enclosure 3 ML13276A0662013-08-31031 August 2013 ANP-3153(NP), Revision 0, Browns Ferry Units 1, 2, and 3 LOCA-ECCS Analysis MAPLHGR Limit for Atrium Tm 1OXM Fuel, Enclosure 8 2023-07-31
[Table view] Category:Technical Specifications
MONTHYEARML22348A0052023-01-25025 January 2023 Issuance of Amendment Nos. 326, 349, and 309; 363 and 35; 159 and 67 Regarding Adoption of TSTF-554, Revise Reactor Coolant Leakage Requirements ML22349A6472023-01-20020 January 2023 Issuance of Amendment Nos. 325, 348, and 308; 362 and 356; and 158 and 66 Regarding Adoption of TSTF-529, Rev. 4, Clarify Use and Application Rules ML22348A0662023-01-13013 January 2023 Issuance of Amendment Nos. 325, 348, & 308 Regarding Application of Advanced Framatome Methodologies, & Adoption of TSTF Traveler TSTF-564-A, Rev. 2, in Support of Atrium 11 Fuel Use (EPID L-2021-LLA-0132) - Nonproprietary CNL-22-039, Application to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-554-A, Revision 1, Revise Reactor Coolant Leakage Requirements (BFN TS-537) (SQN-21-05) (WBN-TS-21-04)2022-07-13013 July 2022 Application to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-554-A, Revision 1, Revise Reactor Coolant Leakage Requirements (BFN TS-537) (SQN-21-05) (WBN-TS-21-04) ML21285A0682021-10-28028 October 2021 Issuance of Amendment Nos. 319, 342, and 302 Regarding the Adoption of Technical Specification Task Force Traveler TSTF-582, Revision 2 ML21214A1392021-08-30030 August 2021 Issuance of Amendment Nos. 318, 341, and 301 Regarding Changes to Technical Specification 3.8.6, Battery Cell Parameters ML21075A0762021-04-30030 April 2021 Issuance of Amendment Nos. 316, 339, and 299 Regarding the Incorporation of the Tornado Missile Risk Evaluator Into the Licensing Basis ML21041A4892021-04-0808 April 2021 Issuance of Amendment Nos. 315, 338, and 298 Regarding the Adoption of Technical Specifications Task Force Traveler, TSTF-425, Revision 3 ML20282A3452020-11-19019 November 2020 Issuance of Amendment Nos. 313, 336, 296, 350, 344, 138, and 44 Revise Emergency Plan On-Shift Emergency Medical Technician & Onsite Ambulance Requirements ML20190A1052020-08-11011 August 2020 Correction to Amendment No. 319 Regarding Revisions to Technical Specification 3.3.6.1, Primary Containment Isolation Instrumentation ML20085G8962020-06-26026 June 2020 Issuance of Amendment Nos. 312, 335, and 295 Regarding Request to Revise Emergency Plan Staff Augmentation Times CNL-20-003, Application for Technical Specifications Change Regarding Risk-Informed Justification for the Relocation of Specific Surveillance Frequency Requirements to a Licensee Controlled Program (BFN-TS-516)2020-03-27027 March 2020 Application for Technical Specifications Change Regarding Risk-Informed Justification for the Relocation of Specific Surveillance Frequency Requirements to a Licensee Controlled Program (BFN-TS-516) ML18277A1102019-08-27027 August 2019 Units, 1 & 2 Issuance of Amendment Nos. 309, 332, 292, 345, 339, 128, and 31 Regarding Unbalanced Voltage Protection ML18283A8972018-10-10010 October 2018 Enclosure 1: Proposed Changes to Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant Unit 1 Technical Specifications, Attachments 1, 2, & 3 ML18251A0032018-09-27027 September 2018 Issuance of Amendment Nos. 305, 328, and 288 to Revise Technical Specification 5.5.12, Primary Containment Leakage Rate Testing Program (CAC Nos. MG0113, MG0114, and MG0115; EPID L-2017-LLA-0292) ML17215A2432017-10-0202 October 2017 Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant, Units 1, 2, and 3; Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 - Issuance of Amendments to Change Technical Specifications to Adopt Technical Specifications Task Force Traveler-522 (CAC No. MF9562-MF9566) CNL-17-015, Transmittal of Response to Proposed Technical Specifications (TS) Change TS-505 - Request for License Amendments - Extended Power Uprate (EPU) - Supplement 36, Transmission System Update -Safety Aspects2017-01-20020 January 2017 Transmittal of Response to Proposed Technical Specifications (TS) Change TS-505 - Request for License Amendments - Extended Power Uprate (EPU) - Supplement 36, Transmission System Update -Safety Aspects NL-17-015, Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant, Units 1, 2, and 3 - Transmittal of Response to Proposed Technical Specifications (TS) Change TS-505 - Request for License Amendments - Extended Power Uprate (EPU) - Supplement 36, Transmission System Update -Saf2017-01-20020 January 2017 Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant, Units 1, 2, and 3 - Transmittal of Response to Proposed Technical Specifications (TS) Change TS-505 - Request for License Amendments - Extended Power Uprate (EPU) - Supplement 36, Transmission System Update -Safe ML16330A1582017-01-17017 January 2017 Issuance of Amendments Regarding Revisions to Technical Specification 4.3.1.2, Fuel Storage Criticality ML16028A4142016-04-26026 April 2016 Issuance of Amendment to Revise Technical Specifications Related to Cycle 18 Safety Limit Minimum Critical Power Ratio ML15317A4782016-02-0909 February 2016 Issuance of Amendment to Revise Technical Specifications Related to Cycle 18 Safety Limit Minimum Critical Power Ratio ML15344A3212016-01-0707 January 2016 Issuance of Amendment Regarding Modification of Technical Specification 3.4.9, RCS Pressure and Temperature (P/T) Limits ML15321A4722015-12-23023 December 2015 Issuance of Amendments Regarding Revision to Table 3.3.6.1-1, Primary Containment Isolation Instrumentation ML15287A2132015-12-16016 December 2015 Issuance of Amendments Regarding Technical Specification Changes to Reactor Core Safety Limits ML15324A2472015-12-14014 December 2015 Issuance of Amendment to Adopt TSTF-501, Revision 1, Relocate Stored Fuel Oil and Lube Oil Volume Valves to Licensee Control ML15287A3712015-12-0404 December 2015 Issuance of Amendments for the Adoption of Technical Specifications Task Force Standard Technical Specifications Change Traveler TSTF-535 (CNL-15-029) ML15212A7962015-10-28028 October 2015 Issuance of Amendments to Transition to Fire Protection Program NFPA-805 ML15251A5402015-09-29029 September 2015 Issuance of Amendment Regarding Control Rod Scram Time Testing Frequency Per TSTF-460, Revision 0 CNL-15-056, Application to Modify Technical Specification 2.1.1.2, Reactor Core Minimum Critical Power Ratio Safety Limits (TS-506)2015-09-25025 September 2015 Application to Modify Technical Specification 2.1.1.2, Reactor Core Minimum Critical Power Ratio Safety Limits (TS-506) CNL-15-073, Application to Modify the Technical Specifications by Adding New Specification TS 3.3.8.3, Emergency Core Cooling System Preferred Pump Logic, Common Accident Signal (CAS) Logic, and Unit Priority Re-Trip Logic, And.2015-09-16016 September 2015 Application to Modify the Technical Specifications by Adding New Specification TS 3.3.8.3, Emergency Core Cooling System Preferred Pump Logic, Common Accident Signal (CAS) Logic, and Unit Priority Re-Trip Logic, And. ML15065A0492015-06-0202 June 2015 Issuance of Amendment Revising Pressure and Temperature Limit Curves CNL-15-070, Withdrawal of Proposed Technical Specification Change to Revise the Leakage Rate Through MSIVs - TS-4852015-05-29029 May 2015 Withdrawal of Proposed Technical Specification Change to Revise the Leakage Rate Through MSIVs - TS-485 CNL-15-019, License Amendment Request for the Adoption of Technical Specifications Task Force (TSTF) Traveler TSTF-460-A, Revision 0, Control Rod Scram Time Testing Frequency (TS-501)2015-03-0909 March 2015 License Amendment Request for the Adoption of Technical Specifications Task Force (TSTF) Traveler TSTF-460-A, Revision 0, Control Rod Scram Time Testing Frequency (TS-501) CNL-15-029, License Amendment Request for the Adoption of Technical Specifications Task Force (TSTF) Traveler TSTF-535, Revision 0, Revise Shutdown Margin Definition to Address Advanced Fuel Designs (TS-502)2015-03-0909 March 2015 License Amendment Request for the Adoption of Technical Specifications Task Force (TSTF) Traveler TSTF-535, Revision 0, Revise Shutdown Margin Definition to Address Advanced Fuel Designs (TS-502) CNL-15-033, License Amendment Request Under Exigent Circumstances for the Change to Add a Reference to the ATRIUM-10 Xm NRC Safety Evaluation Approval in Technical Specification 5.6.5.b in Support of ATRIUM-10 Xm Fuel Use2015-02-12012 February 2015 License Amendment Request Under Exigent Circumstances for the Change to Add a Reference to the ATRIUM-10 Xm NRC Safety Evaluation Approval in Technical Specification 5.6.5.b in Support of ATRIUM-10 Xm Fuel Use CNL-14-156, Technical Specifications (TS) Changes TS-431 and TS-418 - Extended Power Uprate (EPU) - Withdrawal of Requests and Update to EPU Plans and Schedules2014-09-18018 September 2014 Technical Specifications (TS) Changes TS-431 and TS-418 - Extended Power Uprate (EPU) - Withdrawal of Requests and Update to EPU Plans and Schedules NL-14-081, Browns Ferry, Units, 1, 2 & 3, Revised Pages to Technical Specification Change TS-478-Addition of Analytical Methodologies to Technical Specification 5.6.5 and Revision of Tech Spec 2.1.1.2 in Support of ATRIUM-10 Xm Fuel Use at Browns Fer2014-05-16016 May 2014 Browns Ferry, Units, 1, 2 & 3, Revised Pages to Technical Specification Change TS-478-Addition of Analytical Methodologies to Technical Specification 5.6.5 and Revision of Tech Spec 2.1.1.2 in Support of ATRIUM-10 Xm Fuel Use at Browns Ferr CNL-14-081, Units, 1, 2 & 3, Revised Pages to Technical Specification Change TS-478-Addition of Analytical Methodologies to Technical Specification 5.6.5 and Revision of Tech Spec 2.1.1.2 in Support of ATRIUM-10 Xm Fuel Use at Browns Ferry2014-05-16016 May 2014 Units, 1, 2 & 3, Revised Pages to Technical Specification Change TS-478-Addition of Analytical Methodologies to Technical Specification 5.6.5 and Revision of Tech Spec 2.1.1.2 in Support of ATRIUM-10 Xm Fuel Use at Browns Ferry NL-13-148, Browns Ferry, Unit 1, Application to Modify Technical Specification 3.4.9, RCS Pressure and Temperature Limits (BFN TS 484)2013-12-18018 December 2013 Browns Ferry, Unit 1, Application to Modify Technical Specification 3.4.9, RCS Pressure and Temperature Limits (BFN TS 484) CNL-13-148, Application to Modify Technical Specification 3.4.9, RCS Pressure and Temperature Limits (BFN TS 484)2013-12-18018 December 2013 Application to Modify Technical Specification 3.4.9, RCS Pressure and Temperature Limits (BFN TS 484) CNL-13-126, Proposed Technical Specification Change to Revise the Leakage Rate Through MSIVs-TS-4852013-11-22022 November 2013 Proposed Technical Specification Change to Revise the Leakage Rate Through MSIVs-TS-485 ML13199A2212013-08-30030 August 2013 Issuance of Amendments Re. Deletion of References to Section XI of the ASME Code and Incorporate References to the ASME OM Code and Allow Application of 25% Extension of Surveillance Intervals ML13092A3932013-03-27027 March 2013 License Amendment Request to Adopt NFPA 805 Performance-Based Standard for Fire Protection for Light Water Reactor Electric Generating Plants (2001 Edition) (Technical Specification Change TS-480) ML13070A3072013-02-28028 February 2013 Technical Specification Change TS-478 - Addition of Analytical Methodologies to Technical Specification 5.6.5 for Browns Ferry 1, 2, & 3, & Revision of Technical Specification 2.1.1.2 for Browns Ferry Unit 2, in Support of ATRIUM-10 Xm Fuel ML11189A2172012-07-30030 July 2012 Issuance of Amendments Regarding Request to Add Technical Specification 3.7.3, Control Room Emergency Ventilation System, Action to Address Two Crev Subsystems Inoperable ML12114A0042012-04-18018 April 2012 Supplement to License Amendment Request to Transition to Areva Fuel ML1011601532010-04-16016 April 2010 Supplemental Information for Technical Specification Change TS-473 - Areva Fuel Transition Amendment Request ML0923700452009-11-19019 November 2009 Issuance of Amendments Regarding Technical Specification Improvement to Adopt Technical Specification Task Force (TSTF) TSTF-476, Revision 1 ML0931001212009-10-31031 October 2009 Attachment 19, Browns Ferry Unit 1 -Technical Specification Change 467, ANP-2638NP, Revision 2, Applicability of Areva Np BWR Methods to Extend Power Uprate Conditions ML0931402652009-10-31031 October 2009 Attachment 13, Browns Ferry Unit 1 - Technical Specification Change 467, ANP-2864(NP), Revision 2, Reload Safety Analysis Report 2023-01-25
[Table view] |
Text
BROWNS FERRY NUCLEAR PLANT UNITS 1 AND 2 EMERGENCY CORE COOLING SYSTEMS I'OW PRESSURE COOLANT INJECTION
'ODIFICATIONS FOR PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT OCTOBER 1977
l ~
l 11M ' fq I'rw
'I
.r
~
'l t
N I~
Q fgg~gg
'h ba'zaQ
@pwxQk
~ <<Ve~f p4r4g 'j~fggggigp
TABLE OF CONTENTS 1
2.0 0 INTRODUCTION BACKGROUND
................... Pacae 2
3 3 0 DISCUSSION 4 3.1 Accident Descri tion 4 3.2 Modification 5
- 3. 2. 1 Suction Line Break . 0 C 0 3.2.2 Dischar e Line Break 0 0 0 3.3 Model A lication . 9 3.4 Safet Anal sis 9
- 3. 4. 1 ui ment Ca abilit to Perform as Anal zed . 10 3.4.2 ui ment Interfaces 14 3.4.3 Functional Interface 0 0 ~ 0 0 17 3.4.5 'alit 3.4.4 Satisfaction of A ro riate S tandards Assurance and Control 17 18 4 0
SUMMARY
AND CONCLUSIONS....... 19
5.0 REFERENCES
. . . - 20
LIST OF TABLES Table Title ECCS Pump Configuration LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS
~pi ate Title System Normal Operation System Mode of Operation During Unit 1 LOCA (Suction Line Break) No Failures System Mode of Operation During Unit 1 LOCA (Suction Line Break) RHR Injection Valve Failure System Mode of Operation During Unit 1 LOCA (Suction Line Break) Diesel Failure System Mode of Operation During Unit 1 LOCA (Suction Line Break) Battery Failure System Mode of Operation During Unit 1 LOCA (Suction Line Break) Opposite Unit Spurious Accident Signal 7 System Mode of Operation During Unit 1 LOCA (Discharge Line Break) No Failure System Mode of Operation During Unit 1 LOCA (Discharge Line Break) RHR Injection Valve Failure System Mode of Operation During Unit 1 LOCA (Discharge Line Break) Diesel Failure 10 System Mode of Operation During Unit 1 LOCA (Discharge Line Break) Battery Failure System'ode of Operation During Unit 1 LOCA (Discharge Line Break) Opposite Unit Spurious Accident Signal 12 Existing System Valve Bus Arrangement 13 Modified System Valve Bus Arrangement System Valve Control Power Arrangement 15 Modified System RHR Pump Divisional 11
'1 F
Priorities (recirculation pump discharge, LPCX injection, RHR pump minimum flow bypass
1 0 INTRODUCTION t
Browne Ferry Emergency Core Cooling System (ECCS) design and performance for Units 1 and 2 have been the subject of a recent review. 'his review led to a change in the system, which provided a significant reduction in the peak cladding temperature following a postulated recirculation line break. This reduction
'I in peak cladding temperature has been accomplished by elimination of the Low Pressure, Coolant Injection (LPCI) System recirculation loop selection and keeping the Residual Heat Removal (RHR) cross-tie valve closed. A report on this previous modification was submitted to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission in a letter from J.,E. Gilleland to Benard C. Rusche dated Fabruary 12, 1976.
Portions of that previous report are presented 'here to give a coherent description and safety analysis.
The proposed additional modification changes the power supply to the recirculation pump discharge valves, LPCI injection valves, the RHR pump minimum flow bypass valves, and RHR test isolation valves. .The change also modifies independent, valve AC power supplies to eliminate'RC concerns on paralleling of AC power supplies.
Major areas of discussion in this report include the proposed power supplies and a detailed safety analysis of the
'ndependent modification.
2.0 BACKGROUND
With the advent of the Interim Acceptance Criteria, it became
, advisable to consider the simultaneous occurrence of spraying and flooding to meet the stringent new temperature limit of 2300RF.
The thermal-hydraulic models were. refined to permit. an accurate
(
'alculation of coolant remaining in the vessel following the blowdown, and of spray coolant reaching the lower plenum after the boiloff which takes place as it passes through the active fuel region. These refinements permitted an accurate calculation of the flooding rate due to spray operation, and even with the new requirement of an active component failure anywhere in the
. ECCS, no jet pump BWR failed to meet the Interim Acceptance Criteria. ECCS modifications which might have been suggested by
.the new evaluation models were therefore unnecessary.
The final ECCS acceptance criteria adopted by the AEC are more conservative than the interim acceptance criteria. These new criteria reduce operating flexibility and could result in power level restrictions. To offset the effect of the new criteria, a modification has been added to Units l and 2 which takes advantage of the credit given for the flooding effect achieved through the availability of additional LPCI pumps under certain single-failure conditions. TVA commited to modify the power F
supply to the recirculation pump discharge valves, LPCI .injection valves, and RHR pump minimum flow bypass valves before return to power operation following the second refueling outage of the respective units.
3>> 0 DISCUSS ION.
- 3. 1 Accident Descri ion The Design Basis Accident (DBA), Loss-of-Coolant Accident (LOCA),
is one of several hypothesized events used to evaluate the ability of the plant to operate without undue hazard to the health and safety of the public.
The overall initial assumptions remain as described in Section 14.6.3. 1 of the FSAR:
The reactor is operating at the most severe condition at the time of the LOCA, which maximizes the parameter of interest:
primary containment response, fission product release, or core standby cooling system requirements.
A complete loss of normal AC power occurs simultaneously with
.the LOCA. This additional condition results in the longest delay. time for the core standby cooling systems to become operational.
The LOCA assumes that a recirculation loop pipeline is instantly severed. This results in the most rapid coolant loss and depressurization with coolant discharged from both ends of the break.
3.2 Modification Modification of the system requires the following hardware and
.wiring changes on Units 1 and 2:
The auto-transfer feature of, valve motive power for recirculation pump discharge, LPCI injection, RHR pump minimum flow bypass valves, and RHR test isolation valves will be isolated from redundant divisional power supplies by motor-generator (M/G) sets 3.2.1 Suction Line Break Effects Figure 2 illustrates operation of the modified system for a break in the recirculation pump suction line. The break location producing the highest peak cladding temperature is, as before, at the nozzle on the pressure vessel. The other side of the postulated "double-ended" break is fed through the recirculation loop by the jet pump no zles, whose small area limits flow to a low value and makes frictional losses negligible in the calculation.
The discharge valves of the recirculation loops will begin closing upon receipt of a permissive signal., The valves are capable of closing against a differential pressure of 200 psid.
To assure the recirculation system discharge valve is not required to close with a differential pressure greater than 200 psid, valve closures are delayed until reactor vessel pressure has decreased to less than 225 psig., By the time the
recirculation discharge valve has stroked sufficiently that it could present a flow-limiting restriction, the vessel pressure will have decayed below 200 psig.
Valve closure is therefore effected in about 62 seconds, of which 29 seconds represents the reactor vessel pressure permissive and 33 seconds the maximum valve closure time. The effect is isolation of the break from the LPCI system injection point.
Approximately 46 seconds after the break, the LPCI startup sequence .is complete and flow commences in both loops. Flow into the broken loop will not, reach its expected value for an additional 16 seconds, when the recirculation discharge valve has fully closed. The RHR pumps go nearly to full runout flow, as limited by the additional resistance in the pump discharge 'line, because each pair of pumps is. delivering flow to its own bank of jet pump nozzles rather than to one bank as would be the case. of loop selection logic. Additional resistance has been added to the RHR pump discharge lines. This replaces the resistance lost when, only one or two pumps are discharging into a system designed for three pump flow. The added resistance prevents insufficient Net Positive Suction Head (NPSH) in these modes of operation.
In analyzing the single failures for a suction line break, both AC and DC power failures are considered (see Figures 4 and 5).
For A8 power considerations the most significant single failure for the modified system is a 480-V Reactor Motor-Operated Valve (MOV) Board failure. This failure results in two RHR pumps
operating in one loop and four CS pumps operating in two CS systems.'
The most significant DC power single failure would be loss of a battery. For a suction line break this failure results in two RHR pumps operating in one loop, one RHR pump operating in the alternate loop, and two CS pumps operating in one CS system Table 1 shows the various pump combinations for postulated single failures.
The unique power arrangement at Browns Ferry Units 1 and 2 requires examination of an opposite unit spurious accident signal. For this event one RHR pump in each loop of each reactor and one core spray system (two pumps) plus all required valves are available.
The limiting single failure is that failure which results in the longest reflood time and consequently the highest peak cladding temperature (PCT). Sensitivity studies have been performed which demonstrate that a typical limiting failure in the modified system is the failure of the RHR injection valve in the unbroken loop. This failure results in four core spray pumps, two in each CS loop, and two RHR pumps in one loop providing ECCS flow to the core. This combination gives a longer reflooding time than one core spray system (two pumps) and one RHR pump in each loop which is available following an opposite unit spurious accident signal.
This is due in part to the effects of counter current flow limiting (CCFL) on the amount of the core spray flow available 1
for reflooding. The assumed occurrence of CCFL results in there
being only a slight improvement with four CS pumps when compared to two CS pumps.'dditionally, the two RHR pumps feeding into one loop deliver significantly less than twice the flow delivered by a single pump feeding each loop due to the system orificing effects. Thus the availability of one RHR pump in each loop for the alternate unit'spurious accident signal provides better reflood characteristics than two RHR pumps into one loop even when supplemented by two additional CS pumps.
3.2.2 Dischar e Line Break Effects Figure 7 illustrates the operation of the modified system with a break in the recirculation pump discharge .line.
When the RHR startup sequence is complete, the RHR flow in the broken loop is. lost through the break. With the modification, the worst-case single failures are failure during opening of the RHR injection valve opposite the break, failure during opening of the RHR pump minimum flow bypass valve serving the RHR pumps intended for injection into the unbroken loop, and failure of a 480-V Reactor Motor-Operated Valve (MOV) Board. Table 1 and Figures 8-11 show the pump combinations which result from the postulated single failures.
The suction line break remains the design basis accident for the modified system, but with a lower calculated peak cladding temperature.
A typical limiting single failure for the discharge line break is the RHR in)ection valve failure. This failure results in four core spray pumps available for core ref looding. This condition results in a longer reflood time than the opposite unit spurious accident signal in which two core spray and one RHR pumps are available for reflooding. As previously discussed one RHR pump provides faster reflooding and, consequently lower PCT than two additional CS pumps.
The present Browns Ferry Units 1 and 2 system utilizes two power supplies for the electrical distribution system providing power to the RHR valves. Figure 12 shows the arrangement of the buses and the valves fed from these buses. Figure 13 shows the modified system which isolates the auto-transfer feature from the electrical distribution system by use of motor-generator sets.
3.3 Model A lication The core heatup calculations are performed using the approved Appendix K emergency core cooling evaluation models.
3.4 'Safet Anal sis The proposed modification has been analyzed and evaluated to assure the changes do not introduce adverse effects to the overall plant. The areas evaluated are discussed in the balance of this section.
3.4.1 ui ment Ca abilit to Perform as Anal zed The major components of the proposed modification are unchanged, except for the power supplies to selected valves. Each major element is considered below:
3.4. 1. 1 Emer enc Diesel-Generators The proposed modification adds the running load of the M/G sets to the operating requirements of the diesel generators This addition does not adversely affect diesel operation and diesel loading remains within design specifications.
'I The operating modes of the RHR pumps were changed by the previous modification such that two pumps discharge to each injection header thereby changing the discharge flow characteristics from that previously established. Prior to reactor startup after the previous modification, flow tests were conducted to establish the pump discharge path characteristics from which pump flow curves were developed. This information was used to determine the additional resistance to be added on the dis'charge side 'of each pump to ensure satisfaction of pump Net Positive Suction Head (NPSH) requirements.
3.4.1.3 Control Circuitr All standards for engineered safeguards control equipment are maintained., Additional relays and wiring have been added to assure single-failure capability.
3.4.1.4 Recirculation Loo E ualizer Valve and RHR S stem Cross-Tie Valve Inadvertent opening of these valves could negate the RHR system injection when needed, therefore one equalizer valve and the cross-tie valve were closed and motive power removed by the previous modification. An annunciator was added to provide redundant, indication when the RHR cross-tie valve and/or equalizer valve are not fully closed.
3.4.1.5 Recirculation Pum Dischar e Valves Closure of the recirculation pump discharge valves is of importance to the proper application of the proposed modification. Three aspects of valve compatibility have been investigated:
3.4.1.5.1 Environment As reported in Section 5.2 of the Browns Ferry FSAR, the recirculation system valves are designed to operate under the environmental conditions associated with the DBA-LOCA.
- 3. 4. 1. 5. 2 Break Ef fects A study of the drywell geometry was performed prior to the previous modification to determine the effects of jet impingement resulting from a postulated recirculation line break. For the break effects study, breaks were assumed at,all terminals, branch lines, and at other locations based upon stress. Breaks were assumed at all locations where pressure plus dead load plus thermal plus earthquake stresses exceed 0.8(1.2$ +SA).
Additionally, in piping runs where no stresses occur in excess of
- 0. 8 (1. 2++@ ), a'inimum of two intermediate breaks were postulated based upon the highest total stresses combined as above.
For the suction line break, re-routing of cable has been provided, to ensure recirculation discharge valve operation.
Valve closure at the time of a discharge line break is not considered in the ECCS analysis. Also, closure of the discharge valve does not change the RHR system input capability during a discharge line break (See Figure 7).
3.4. 1.5.3 Valve Differential Pressure Recirculation pump discharge valve closure requires both a LOCA initiation signal and a decrease in reactor pressure to the permissive setting. With valve closure initiation delayed until reactor pressure has decayed to less than 225 psig (approximately 29 seconds) the differential pressure across the closed valve will always be less than the maximum 200 psid. The sensor and permissive circuitry are designed to satisfy all requirements for engin>ered safeguards control systems.
3.4 1.6 RHR Pum Minimum Flow B ss Valve RHR pump minimum flow bypass valves will,be provided'with redundant power supplies and control logic to assure maximum pump protection under postulated accident conditions.
- 3. 4. 1. 7 Batteries The proposed modification does not change any of the operating requirements on the station batteries.
3.4. 1.8 Motor-Generator M/G Sets
.Qualified motor-generator (M/G) sets will be used as isolation devices for the power feeds to the 480-V Reactor MOV boards with auto-tran'sfer feature (see Figure 13) . Although only one M/G set will normally supply power to the Reactor MOV board, both M/G sets will run at all times to assure readiness of 'the alternate M/G to accept load, if,required. M/G set's will be sized to accept valve loads at any time during the initiating event (62 secs.). Fire protection to the M/G sets will be evaluated and appropriate measures taken to assure adequate fire protection.
3,4. 1. 8. 1 Seismic ualification The operability of the motor-generator sets and all the appurtenances vital to their operation during and after a SSE is verified in accordance with IEEE 344 as applicable to the plant.
3.4. 1.9 RHR Test Isolation Valves he RHR test isolation valves will be provided with redundant power supplies and closing control logic to protect against those postulated occurrences which would leave the valve open and route an unacceptable amount of flooding water away from the core.
Redundant controls are wired. as specified in 3.4.2.3.
3.4.2 ui ment Interfaces The effects of the proposed change on the various operating modes of the equipment have been evaluated and found to be acceptable, as described below:
3.4.2. 1 Emer enc Diesel-Generators The proposed modification introduces no new or different interfaces for this equipment.
I 3.4.2.2 Valve Power Motor operated valve (MOV) boards for those valves necessary for automatic operation for LPCI injection (recirculation pump discharge, LPCI injection, RHR pump minimum flow bypass, and RHR test isolation) will interface with divisionalized 480 VAC shutdown boards with M/G sets as isolation devices. Two 480-V AC Reactor MOV boards will be divisionalized and supply power to those valves necessary for the RHR function (see Figure 13).
These valve boards will have an auto-transfer feature for redundant power but will be protected from the redundant .
divisional source by using M/G sets as isolation devices. The auto transfer feature will be eliminated from all valve boards not. protected by M/G sets.
3.4.2.3 Valve Motor Control To ensure that a malfunction in the individual valve controller does not couple back to the other valve control circuits, the redundant A and B circuits were provided separate relays and contacts in the logic panels on a previous modification. This separated, redundant arrangement has been applied to the RHR and recirculation system valves needed for operation as described.
System interfacing and protection as related to the valve motor control centers are unchanged.
3.4.2.4 DC Control Power As shown in Figure 14 and Browns Ferry FSAR Figure 8.6-3, 250 VDC from the station batteries provides control power to RHR logic panels. After the proposed modification the same equipment receives power from this source as in the original design.
Failure of any one station battery does not cause interaction's that exceed the limiting case for core cooling capabilities.
3.4.2.5 RHR Lo ic Panels To provide the necessary redundancy required on the previous modification, changes were made to the RHR logic panels. To preclude valve-to-valve interface, redundant and separate relays and contacts were provided for each RHR and recirculation system.
Each of the added redundant relays was provided full separation from all others by enclosure in a metal box. The wiring from redundant contacts between the two logic panels was provided separation by enclosure in flex conduit and termination in metal junction boxes. This logic scheme will be maintained in the new modification.
3..4.2.6 Motor-Generator (M/G) Sets Two M/G sets will interface between each board with the auto-transfer feature and shutdown boards. These M/G sets provide isolation of the boards from redundant sources.
- 3. 4. 3 Functional Interf ace The RHR system, as discussed in this report, performs as a short-term post-LOCA core cooling function. The system also provides a long-term containment cooling function'which is described in Sections 4. 8.6.2 and 14.6.3.3.2 of the FSAR. The
. effects of the proposed change to the core'ooling function on the containment cooling function were evaluated and found to be acceptable after modification as described below.
In analyzing single failures which might influence long-term suppression pool cooling, both AC and DC control and emergency power failures as well as component failures in the RHR and'RHRSW (cooling water) systems were considered. The worst case single failure (Reactor MOV Board lass) with the modified system still leaves two RHR heat exchangers, two RHR pumps, and two RHR Service Water pumps and associated valving available for suppression pool cooling. The suppression pool temperature versus time response for this combination of equipment is shown by curve C in FSAR Figure 14.6-12.
. 3.4.4 Satisfaction of A ro riate Standards The proposed modification directly affects as Engineered Safeguards System and has been designed to Class I system standards. The standards and guides which were applicable to the original design have been reviewed to assure the modified system design, equipment, and installation meet or exceed the qualifications of the unmodified system.
- 3. 4. 5 'alit Assurance and Control Quality assurance and control will be applied to this modification as detail'ed in Appendix D of the Browns Perry FSAR.
Appendix D incorporates the requirement of 10CPR50, Appendix B.
4.0
SUMMARY
AND CONCLUSIONS The proposed modification involves some physical changes to the plant to permit divisional isolation of the auto-transfer concept and adoption of the total system availability of the new design.
The analytical methods used reflect the most recent
'determinations of NRC staff and reactor suppliers for modeling the performance of Emergency Core Cooling Systems.
The application of the proposed modification adds to the overall capability of the plant to continue operation in a manner that ensures the health and safety of the public while providing benefit in the production of electrical energy.
-1 9-
5 0 REFERENCES
- 1. Interim Policy Statement, USAEC, dated June 19, 1971;
Subject:
AEC Adopted Interim Acceptance Criteria for Performance of, ECCS for Light-Water Power Reactors.
- 2. Letter from J., E. Gilleland (TVA) to Benard C. Rusche (NRC) dated February 12, 1976.
t TABLE 1 ECCS PUMP CONFIGURATION Suction Side Break Pum s Available++
No Failures 4 Core Spray, 2 RHR in each Loop Opposite Unit Spurious Accident 2 Core Spray, 1 RHR in each Loop Signal RHR Injection Valve Failure+ 4 Core Spray, 2 RHR in one Loop RHR Minimum Valve Failure+ 4 Core Spray, 2 RHR in one Loop Recirculation Discharge Valve 4 Core Spray, 2 RHR in one Loop Failure-Break Side* 'I 480 V Reactor MOV Board+ 4 Core Spray, 2 RHR in one Loop Diesel Failure 2 Core Spray, 2 RHR in one Loop, 1 RHR in other Loop Battery Failure 2 Core Spray, 2 RHR in one Loop, 1 RHR in other Loop Dischar e Side Break Pum s Available+4 No Failures 4 Core Spray, 2 RHR in one Loop RHR Injection Valve Failure~ 4 Core Spray RHR Minimum Flow Valve Failure+ 4 Core Spray Diesel Failure 2 Core Spray, 1 RHR Battery Failure 2 Core Spray, 1 RHR Opposite Unit Spurious Accident 2 Core Spray, 1 RHR Signal 480 V Reactor MOV Board+ 4 Core Spray
+*In Unbroken Loop
DIV I DIV II D/G A 0/G 8 D/G C 0/G 0 lA lA 2A 1C l ~~~
1C 2C 2C 1
18 18 28 28 ID 10 2D 2D CROSSTIE CROSSTIE LPCI A LPCI 8 LPCI A LPCI 8 DISCH SUCTION DISCH NOT RUNNING RECIRC 8 RECIRC A RECIRC 8 RECIRC A Figure 1 System /t/ormal Operation
DIV I DIV II 0/G A 0/G 8 DIG C 0/G 0 1A 1A 2A 2A 1C 1C 2C 2C 18 18 28 28 1D 10 2D 2D L C g~< i CROSSTIE CROSSTIE LPCI A LPCI 8 LPCI'A LPCI 8 BREAK DISCH SUCTION DISCH DISABLED OR NOT RUNNING RECIRC 8 RECIRC A RECIRC 8 RECIRC A Figure 3 System Mode of Operation During Unit 1 LOCA (Suction Line Break) LPCI Injection Valve Failure
OIV I OIV II DIG A OiG 8 OlG C DiG D 1A t
0 4 q IAI I
2AI
~ 2A I 1C 'IC I 2CI 2C'
~ o-4 r 18 t IBI o
2BI 28l 10 ID I
20 ghC',
c $C,:. L C,'C:- sf"qi L C 20'ROSSTIE CROSSTIE LPCI A LPCI 8 LPCI A LPCI 8 BREAK D ISCH SUCTION 0 ISCH DISABLED OR NOT RUNNING RECIRC 8 RECIRC A RECIRC 8 RECIRC A Eigure System Mode of Operation During Vnit t LQCA (Suction Line BreakJ. No Eaj/ures
OIV I DIV II D/G A D/G 8 0/G C D/G 0 I 1 1A 1A 2A 2A 1C 1C 2C 2C 18 18 28 28 1D 10 2D 20 L C CROSSTIE CROSSTIE LPCI A LPCI 8 LPCI A LPCI 8 BREAK OISCH SUCTION DISCH
,1.j:g DISABLED OR NOT RUNNING RECIRC 8 R ECIRC A RECIRC 8 RECIRC A Figure 5 system Node of Opert tron During Unit 1 LOCA fSuction Line Break J Battery Fa//ure
OIV I 0 IV I I 0/G A OlG 8 OIG C 0/G 0 1A 1A 2A 2A 1C 1C =
2C 2C 18 18 28 28 10 I M 10 20 20 I
L C -;;C'.~ ~4~, L C CROSSTIE CROSSTIE LPCI A LPCI 8 LPCI A LPCI 8 BREAK 0ISCH SUCTION 0ISCH 0 ISA8 LEO 0 R NOT R UN N IN G RECIRC 8 RECIRC A RECIRC 8 RECIRC A figure 4 System Node of Operation Quring Unit 1 LOCA (Suction Line Breakj Qiesel failure
DIV I DIV II 0/G A 0/G 8 0/G C 0/G 0 1A lA 2A 2A 1C
~ mp-4~~
1C 2C 2C 1B 1B 2B 2B 1D I M 1D 2D 2D 1
g4a C c L C L C CROSSTIE CROSSTIE LPCI A LPCI B LPCI A LPC I B OISCH SUCTION DISCH
@j:;.'c. DISABLED NOT RUNNING OR NOT CONSIDERED IN RECIRC 8 RECIRC A ANALYSIS RECIRC 8 RECIRC A f Figure 7" Sjetem Node of Operation During Unit / LOCA (Dia/ra/ye Line Break),No Fai/um
OIV I 0 IV II DiG A 0/G 8 DiG C OiG D 1A 1AI 2AI 2A I 1C 1C I 2CI 2C 1B I o~
IB I l
2B I 2B I P
1D 10 I 20 I
20' L C C .
~ L C 4.'.-: L
+~
CROSSTIE CROSSTIE LPCI A LPCI 8 LPCI A LPCI 8 BREAK 0ISCH SUCTION 0ISCH
- ~&+>?N "Xr';~, DISABLED OR NOT RUNNING RECIRC B RECIRC A RECIRC B RECIRC A Figure 6 $pstem Mode of Opere tion During Unit 1 LOCA (Suction Line Break J Oppoute Unit Spurt'aa Accident Signei
DIV I DIV II 0/G A 0/G 8 0/G C D/G 0 1A 1A 2A 2A IC 'C 2C 2C 18 18 28 28 1D 10 2D 2D I
CROSSTIE CROSSTIE LPCI A LPCI 8 LPCI A LPCI 8 DISCH SUCTION D ISCH DISABLED, NOT RUNNING.
OR NOT CONSIDERED IN ANALYSIS RECIRC 8 RECIRC A RECIRC 8 RECIRC A Figun.' - System Mode of Operation During Unit / LOCA (Discharge Line BraakJ Diesel Failure
DIV I DIV II 0/G A 0/G 8 0/6 C 0/G 0 1A 1A 2A 2A 1C 1C 2C 2C 18 18 28 28 10 10 20 2D C
CROSSTIE CROSSTIE LPCI A LPCI 8 LPCI A LPC I 8 DISCH SUCTION D ISCH DISABLED, NOT RUNNING OR NOT CONSIDERED IN ANALYSIS RECIRC 8 RECIRC A RECIRC 8 RECIRC A Figure 8 System IVIode of Operation During Unit 1 LOCA (Discharge Line BreakJ LPCI Injection Valve Failure
DIV I = DIV II
~ D/G A 0/G,B DIG C 0/G D I -f.
1A'A '0 C,
I 1C 1C 2C 2C 18 18 28 28 I 1D 20 L L i C CROSSTIE CROSSTIE LPCI A ug LPCI 8 LPCI A LPCI 8 C
DISCH SUCTION DISCH DISABLE, NOT RUNNING OR NOT CONSIDERED IN ANALYSIS RECIRC 8 RECIRC A RECIRC 8 RECIRC A Figure SYstem Mode of Operation During Unit 7 LOCA fDischarye Line BreakJ Opposite Unit Spurr'ous Accident Signal
0)V I DIV II 0/G A DIG 8 DIG C 0/G 0 1A I
1A 2A 2A I
1C l ~~&
-1C 2C 2C 7
18 18 28 28 1D
'I 1D 2D 20 C
CROSSTIE CROSSTIE LPCI A LPCI 8 LPCI A LPCI 8 0ISCH SUCTION OISCH
<<X~XX~~4 DISABLED, NOT RUNNING OR NOT CONSIDERED IN ANALYSIS RECIRC 8 RECIRC A RECIRC 8 RECIRC A Figure $0 SyatenI Node of Operation During Unit 7 LOCA (Discharge Line Breakf Battery Failure
O/G A DIG C OlG 8 DJG D Div 'I OIV II DIV I OIV II 4 kV SHNDII ED A'
'kV SSTDH
-'.HD.'C .
'O 4 kV SHTDN HD H NO 4 hV SHTDN HD D '0
'IA 1A; -. 2A 2A 18 - 18 28 28 1C 1C 2C 2C 10 1D 2D 2D L L C C L C C I.
)HC )Nc UNIT1 . NC NC VNIT2 4SOV SHTON 480V SHTON 480V SHTDN 480V 6HTON BD 1A BD 18 BO 2A BD 28
) NC )Nc 'NC )NC )HC )Bc )Nc
)Hc Nc .
IIO )NO
) )
Nc )NC 0 480V RX MOVBD 10 )
)NO480V RX MOV BO 1C 480V RX MOV BD 2D /
gPSOV RX MOV 80 2C
)NG)NG )Nc ) Nc )Hc )VC NC NC
) Nc )Nc 'C'C )bc )Hc 2458 10.16A 243A 0-258 2%58 '10.16A . 243A 10-258 2-538 10-25 A 245A lo-168 2438 10-25 A 245A 10 168 C IJ 0 z0 0 L
K~ O< I O IL 0 ~O IO O~
Qz z -- ELECTRICAL INTERLOCK CO I.
Figvre 32 Existing Syatem Valve 3us Arrangement
- l. Valve closed and motive power removed.
D/G A D/G C D/G 8 O/6 O VXV SHTDX BD A No ) NRY SHTDN BD C No ) BD 8 blab DRY SHTDN No ) HXY SHTOX BD D XO }
J bbbb~: b bb b xc ) IIC )
%SOY SHTDH BD IA UNIT I OV SHTOH BD 8 NC) %80Y SHTDH BD 1A UNIT 2 HSOV SHTOH BD 28 KC ) IIC ) KC ) NC ) NC )Nc )Hc) No) N ) HC ) HC) HC ) NC) HC) HC) NC ) NC ) NC )
NC ) MY NC) xc ) RX RSDY xo )
RX MOV BD IA MOV BD 2A
)
b IH-l2A /75-25) X/G b
I 5-I2A (75-25)
Ho ) CORE SPRAY RSOV RX MOV BD IN).
IB X
) 2D-N No CORE SPRAY
%loY RX MOY Bo INJ 28 NC X/G 2D-A
)
X/G IE-A IO-l28 /75-53)
M/G IE-H M/0 2E-A .
-bIV-l28 /75-53l X/8 2E-N xo) COPE SPRAY IN3.'SOV xc) xo) CORE SPRAY INJ. NC)
RX MOV BO IC %SOY RX MOV SD 2C Nc NO CSOV RX MOY BD ID lIBOV RX MOV BO 20 FIG. IS MOD IF IED SYSTEM 2-538 (68-79) VALVE 2-538 (68-79) lo-3%A (?H-59) lo-f6A (7%-7) lo-25A (7%-53) l0-3%A,(?V-59) Io-16A (747) lo-25A (7%-53)
RECIRC DISCH RHR TEST ISOL RHR PMP: .LPCI IHJ. evs RECIRC DISCH RHR TEST ISOL RHR PMP LPCI INJECTION MINI-FLo ARRAHGEM HT MINI-FLO QSOV RX MOV BD IE HC NO )- %SOY RX MOV BD 2E NC)
UNITS I 4 2
)
2-53A (68 3) IO-3%8 (74-73) b Io-l68 (7%-30) Io-258 (? tI-67) K.2 53A (6S 3) Io-3%8 (7% 73) Io-168 (74-30) l0-258 (7% 67)
ReCIRC OISCH RHR TEST ISOL RHR PMP Mlxl-FLPf LPCI IHJECTIOH RECIRC DISCH. RHR TEST ISOL RHR PMo MINI FLOI LPCI INJ.
r NOTE 2 NOTES:
I LOGIC A I. THIS DIAGRAM IS FOR REPORT 250Y DC CLARIFICATION OIILY AHO IS POWER NOT IKTBDED TO REPRESENT THE BITIRE CONTROL SEE APPROPRIATE PS'RRANGEMEN<.
LOGIC A RNR ELEMENTAR. FOR COMPI.cTE LOCA WIRIHG LOCATIONS AND INTFRFACES.
LOW FLOW I20V AC DIV I FROM MOTIVE LOGIC A LOGIC A 2 GUARDED CIRCUITS OF ScPARATE RELAYS AHD CONTACTS IN LOG'lC LOGIC A I.OGIC A POWER RX PRESS RX PRESS PANELS - THE ONLY AREA WHERE RX PRESS RX PRESS <%50 <225 CIRCUITS INTERFACE
< N50 PSIG < 225 PSIG PSIG PSIG TEST TEST TEST PUMPS TEST TES TEST RELAYS ARE ENCASED IK SHEET
'UNNING l I STEEL. CABLING IS ROUTcD IN I'
I FLEX CCHDUIT: TEPAIHATIOHS I ARE IN METAL JUNCTION BOX.-
I I 3. ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROL I
L ON TEST FUNCTIONS.
LPCI INJ. RHR TEST REC IRC DISCN IIIN I-FLOW IO-25A l0-3UA 2-538 IO-IGA IO-258 IO-3%8 2-53A IO-IGB OPEN CLOSE CLOSE OPEN I
I I
I I
I TEST TEST TEST TEST TEST TEST PUMPS I PUNNING I LOGIC 8 LOGIC 8 LOGIC 8 LOGIC 8 PX PecSS RX PRESS RX PRESS RX PRcSS I < <50 PSIG < %50 PSIG < %50 PSIG < 225 PSIG I
120V AC LOW FLOW I
I FROM DIY Q I MOTIVE I
POWER I LOGIC 8 I
I LOCA I
I I
I I LOGIC 8 250Y DC I I I I POKER NOTE 2 FIGURE lq SYSTOI VALVE CONTROL POWER ARRAIIGEMENT
ir