ML18101A870

LER 95-013-00:on 950703,surveillance Testing of Seismic Monitoring Instrumentation Was Performed Approx Six & One Half Hr Late Due to Personnel Error.Provides Appropriate Levels of Discipline to Personnel involved.W/950731 Ltr

ML18101A870
Person / Time
Site:	Salem
Issue date:	07/31/1995
From:	Pastva M, Warren C Public Service Enterprise Group
To:	NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
LER-95-013-01, LER-95-13-1, NUDOCS 9508090167
Download: ML18101A870 (7)

Text

OPS~G Puolic Service Electric and Gas Company P.O. Box 236 Hancocks Bridge. New Jersey 08038-0236 Nuclear Business Unit July 31, 1995 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 Attn: Document Control Desk SALEM GENERATING STATION LICENSE NO. DPR-70 DOCKET NO. 50-272 UNIT NO. 1 LICENSEE EVENT REPORT NO. 95-013-00 This Licensee Event Report is being submitted pursuant to the requirements of Code of Federal Regulation 10CFR50. 73 (a) (2) (i) (B).

Sincerely,

~td:uu'-

c1ay C. Warren General Manager -

Salem Operations SORC Mtg.95-084 MJPJ:vs C Distribution LER File

... r* r- * .

. ..._, ... '-~* -.. 't 9508090167 950731 onP annrK 05000272

NRC FORM 366 . U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION - APPROVED BY OMB NO. 3150-0104

.(5-92) EXPIRES 5/31/95 ESTIMATED BURDEN PER RESPONSE TO COMPLY WITH THIS INFORMATION COLLECTION REQUEST: 50.0 HRS. FORWARD LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) COMMENTS REGARDING BURDEN ESTIMATE TO THE INFORMATION AND RECORDS MANAGEMENT BRANCH (MNBB 7714), U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION, WASHINGTON, DC 20555-0001, AND TO THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION PROJECT (3150-0104), . OFFICE OF (See reverse for required number of digits/characters for each block) MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET, WASHINGTON, DC 20503.

FACILITY NAME (1) DOCKET NUMBER (2) 05000 272 II PAGE (3) 1 OF06 Salem Generating Station - Unit 1 I*

TITLE (4) Surveillance Testing of Seismic Monitoring Instrumentation Performed Approximately Six *and One Half Hours Late EVENT DATE (5) LEA NUMBER l6 REPORT NUMBER (7l OTHER FACILITIES INVOLVED (8)

FACILITY NAME DOCKET NUMBER SEQUENTIAL REVISION MONTH DAY YEAR YEAR MONTH DAY YEAR NUMBER NUMBER 05000 FACIUTY NAME DOCKET NUMBER 07 03 95 95 -- 013 -- 00 07 31 95 05000 OPERATING 5 THIS REPORT IS SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF 10 CFR §: (Check one or more (11)

I MODE (9) 20.402(b) 20.405(c) 50.73(a)(2)(iv) 73.7.1(b)

I L:~E~~~0) I 20.405(a)(1 )(i) 50.36(c)(1) 50.73(a)(2)(v) 73.i1(c) 0 I 20.405 (a)(1 )(ii) 50.36(c)(2) 50.73(a)(2)(vii) OTHER 20.405(a)(1 )(iii) x 50.73(a)(2) (i) 50. 73(a) (2) (viii) (A) (Specify in Abstract below and in Text. NRC 20.405(a) (1) (iv) 50.73(a)(2)(ii) 50. 73 (a) (2) (viii) (8) Form 366A) 20.405(a)(1 )(v) 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 50.73(a)(2)(x)

LICENSEE CONTACT FOR THIS LER 12l

-NAME TELEPHONE NUMBER (Include Area Code)

M.J. Pastva, Jr.' LER Coordinator 609 339-5165 COMPLETE ONE LINE FOR EACH COMPONENT FAILURE DESCRIBED IN THIS REPORT(13\

REPORTABLE REPORTABLE CAUSE SYSTEM COMPONENT MANUFACTURER CAUSE SYSTEM COMPONENT MANUFACTURER TONPRDS TO NPRDS SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT EXPECTED (14) EXPECTED MONTH DAY YEAR I YES Of yes, complete EXPECTED SUBMISSION DATE} X NO SUBMISSION DATE (15)

I ABSTRACT (Umit to 1400 spaces, i.e., approximately 15 single-spaced typewritten lines) (16)

On 7/3/95, at 0735 hours0.00851 days <br />0.204 hours <br />0.00122 weeks <br />2.796675e-4 months <br />, the once per 31 days interval was missed for channel checking the 3 Seismic Monitoring Triaxial Time-History Accelograph Sensors and 4 Triaxial Peak Accelograph Sensors on Salem Unit 1. As such, Technical Specification (TS) SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENT 4.3.3.3.1 was missed for the subject instruments, identified in TS Table 4.3-4. The involved surveillance was subsequently and I

satisfactorily completed approximately 6.5 hours5.787037e-5 days <br />0.00139 hours <br />8.267196e-6 weeks <br />1.9025e-6 months <br /> late, on 7/3/95, at approximately 1400 hours0.0162 days <br />0.389 hours <br />0.00231 weeks <br />5.327e-4 months <br />. This occurrence is attributed to: personnel error - failure to adequately recognize/determine the necessity to perform the surveillance, failure to communicate the necessity to perform the procedure, and failure to take ownership to schedule the surveillance. Contributor: responsibilities for daily and outage scheduling were being streamlined/integrated for daily and outage scheduling, which allowed a lapse I

in identifying the subject surveillance. The appropriate levels of discipline (consistent with PSE&G personnel policies) were provided to involved personnel. The surveillance performance tracking report has been modified to enhance human factors.

The commitment for the required frequency of the review of this report has been clarified. The surveillance performance scheduling system has been changed to preclude a future similar occurrence. A position of "Surveillance Coordinator" in the Station Planning and Scheduling Group has been established for each Unit as an additional barrier to ensure continuity of sur~eillance scheduling and completion during plant at "power .and outage conditions .

NRC FORM 366 (5*92)

LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) TEXT CONTINUATION Salem Generating Station Docket Number LER Number Page 2 of 6 Unit# 1 50-272 95-013-00 Plant and System Identification:

Westinghouse - Pressurized Water Reactor Energy Industry Identification System (EIIS) codes appear in the text as {xx}

Identification of Occurrence:

Surveillance Testing Of Seismic Monitoring Instrumentation Performed Approximately Six And One Half Hours Late Event Date: July 3, 1995 Report Date: July 31, 1995 This report was initiated by Incident Report No. 95-1050Ll Conditions Prior to Occurrence:

Mode 5 Reactor Power % Unit Load MWe Description of Occurrence:

On July 3, 1995, at 0735 hours0.00851 days <br />0.204 hours <br />0.00122 weeks <br />2.796675e-4 months <br />, the once per 31 days interval was missed for channel checking the three (3)

Seismic Monitoring Triaxial Time-History Accelograph sensors

{IN} and four (4) Triaxial Peak Accelograph sensors {IN} on Salem Unit 1. As such, TS SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENT 4.3.3.3.1 was not met for the subject instruments, which are identified in TS Table 4.3-4. The involved surveillance was subsequently and satisfactorily completed approximately six (6) and one half hours late, on July 3, 1995, at approximately 1400 hours0.0162 days <br />0.389 hours <br />0.00231 weeks <br />5.327e-4 months <br />. -

Analysis of Occurrence:

Operability of seismic monitoring Time-History Accelograph sensors and Triaxial Peak Accelograph sensors ensures the capability is available to compare a,measured seismic event to that established by the plant design basis. This occurrence involved an approximate six and one half hour lapse in the performance of the required periodic channel

LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) TEXT CONTINUATION Salem Generating Station Docket Number LER Number Page 3 of 6 Unit# 1 50-272 95-013-00 Analysis of Occurrence: (cont'd) testing of this instrumentation. Discovery of this occurrence was made by the Maintenance - Controls Department TS Surveillance Coordinator (TSSC), approximately one half hour after the subject surveillance, "Seismic Strong Motion Instrumentation Channel Check", IC-13.2.003, went overdue.

Apparent Cause of Occurrence:

This occurrence is attributed to "Personnel Error", with contributors resulting from "Management/Quality Assurance Deficiency", both as classified in Appendix B of NUREG-1022.

Prior to July 3, 1995, the TSSC failed to adequately recognize or seek an understanding of the surveillance performance tracking report code information field.

Consequently, the TSSC was not aware of the necessity to perform the surveillance. Computer coding associated with the subject surveillance identified that performance of the surveillance is required in all operational modes.

Prior to this occurrence, on June 30, 1995, the Station TS Administrator recognized the necessity to advise the TSSC of the upcoming due date of the subject surveillance. However, he became distracted from performing this function and overlooked notifying the TSSC.

The Station Planning and Scheduling Group failed to adequately review the TS surveillance schedules and to ensure timely communication with the Maintenance Department of upcoming surveillances. Consequently, the surveillance was not included on the daily outage schedule for performance.

Management/Quality Assurance Contributors:

The TSSC failed to recognize or understand the meaning of applicable modes coding "7" on the surveillance report, which indicates (is applicable to) all plant operating modes. Prior to this occurrence, the requirements associated with the "7" mode coding had been conveyed via memorandum, dated May 22, 1992.

At the time of this occurrence, roles, responsibilities,

LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) TEXT CONTINUATION Sale~ Generating Station Docket Number LER Number Page 4 of 6 Unit# 1 50-272 95-013-00 Cause of Occurrence: (cont'd)

Management/Quality Assurance Contributors: (cont'd) and positions of daily and outage scheduling of the Station Planning and Scheduling Group personnel were being streamlined and integrated into a uniform structure for daily and outage scheduling. This period of transition allowed a lapse in identifying the subject surveillance, which resulted in a lack of ownership for scheduling its completion. In addition, involved individuals in the Station Planning and Scheduling Group and the Maintenance - Controls Department, had been recently assigned to their positions.

Prior Similar Occurrences:

Prior similar occurrences of. late performances of TS surveillances have been reported in LERs 311/94-005-00, 311/88-011-00, 311/87-003-00, and 272/92-006-00. Corrective actions.to these prior occurrences have included: coaching and counseling of involved personnel, review of the events, stressing the importance of adequate communications, review of administrative procedure requirements, establishment of a Maintenance Controls Department TS Surveillance Coordinator sign-off log for daily review of reports listing upcoming overdue TS surveillances, and Management directive for a TS Administrator to inform TS surveillance coordinators of upcoming surveillances in a timely manner. While review shows these corrective actions were appropriate for these occurrences, the clear accountability for the schedule was not appropriately addressed. As such, the accountability for surveillance tracking has been enhanced through improvement in the Surveillance Performance Scheduling System.

Safety Significance:

This occurrence is reportable pursuant to 10CFRS0.73 (a) (2) (i) (B), due to failure to meet the requirements of the TS 4.3.3.3.1, Table 4.3-4. Although the subject surveillance was performed late, subsequent completion of this testing demonstrated continued operability of the instruments (required in all Operating Modes) during the period of time that completion of the testing was overdue.

LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) TEXT CONTINUATION Salem Generating Station Docket Number LER Number Page 5 of 6 Unit# 1 50-272 95-013-00 Corrective Action:

The appropriate levels of discipline (consistent with PSE&G personnel policies) were provided to involved personnel.

The surveillance performance tracking report has been modified to enhance human factors, in order to provide a better understanding of coding information. This report will continue to be reviewed for potential overdue surveillances. However, PSE&G has modified this commitment (as described in LER 311/94-005-00) to clarify the required frequencies of this review.

Appropriate changes have been made to the surveillance performance scheduling system to preclude a future similar occurrence. These changes include identification of clear responsibilities for daily and outage scheduling. In addition, a position of "Surveillance Coordinator" has been established in the Station Planning and Scheduling Group (one coordinator per Salem Unit). These coordinators will serve as an additional barrier to ensure continuity of surveillance scheduling and completion during plant at power and outage conditions.

MJPJ:vs REF: SORC Mtg.95-084

LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) TEXT CONTINUATION Sale~ Generating Station Docket Number LER Number Page 6 of 6 Unit# 1 50-272 95-013-00 Attachment A PSE&G Commitments For LER 272/95-013-00 The following items represent PSE&G commitments made to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission related to LER 272/95-013-00:

Ongoing Actions PSE&G has modified the surveillance performance tracking report to enhance human factors, in order to provide a better understanding of coding information. This report will continue to be reviewed for potential overdue surveillances.

PSE&G has modified its prior commitment described in LER 311/94-005-00 to clarify the required frequencies of the review and sign off of the surveillance performance tracking report.

Appropriate changes have been made to the surveillance performance scheduling system to preclude a future similar occurrence. These changes include identification of clear responsibilities for daily and outage scheduling. In addition, a position of "Surveillance Coordinator" has been established in the Station Planning and Scheduling Group (one coordinator per Salem Unit). These coordinators will serve as an additional barrier to ensure continuity of surveillance scheduling and completion during plant at power and outage conditions.