ML18036A202

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Comment (83) of Mike Anonymous Regarding Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities
ML18036A202
Person / Time
Site: San Onofre  Southern California Edison icon.png
Issue date: 01/02/2018
From:
- No Known Affiliation
To:
Rules, Announcements, and Directives Branch
References
82FR52944 00083, NRC-2017-0211
Download: ML18036A202 (1)


Text

As of: 1/9/18 11 :02 AM Received:

January 02, 2018 Status: Pending_Post Page 1 of 1 PlUBLIC SUBMISSION Tracking No. lk2-90pg-njqr Comments Due: January 02, 2018 I Submission Type: Web Docket: NRC-2017-0211 Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities Comment On: NRC-2017-0211-0001 Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities; Request for Comment on Draft NUREG Document:

NRC-2017-0211-DRAFT-0084 Comment on FR Doc# 2017-24734

@ Submitter Information Name: Mike Anonymous

  • ti rR 5J 9'11.J // / 15 /d()17 -* **================================

General Comment Thin cans are you even serious? This has got to be a joke! You have already violated laws and our trust for letting unlimited amounts of spent fuel to be stored not only on a beach, but over fault lines, with little security.

Haven't you put us at enough risk? Who* do you really work for? This amount of file was not originally allowed to be stored on sight. Then you allow them to have secret meetings in Poland? What the mother of Peter are you guys doing? You all need to be fired and replaced with people who live here and understand the logic involved with storing Spent nuclear fuel rods on a beach, with a small wall, over a fault line and within . a few miles of a military bombing range that explodes the MOAB. It's the bomb one step under nuclear bombs. How crazy are you people? SUNSI Review Complete Template=

ADM-013 E-RIDS= ADM-OJ

getcontent?objectld=0900006482d90932&format=xml&showorig=false 01/09/2018