ML18033A593
| ML18033A593 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 01/02/2018 |
| From: | Bosold P - No Known Affiliation |
| To: | Rules, Announcements, and Directives Branch |
| References | |
| 82FR52944 00057, NRC-2017-0211 | |
| Download: ML18033A593 (1) | |
Text
As of: 1/9/18 9:53 AM Received: January 02, 2018 Status: Pending_Post Page 1 of 1 PUBLIC SUBMISSION Tracking No. lk2-90pf-lb51 Comments Due: January 02, 2018 Submission Type: Web Docket: NRC-2017-0211 Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities Comment On: NRC-2017-0211-0001 Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities; Request for Comment on Draft NUREG SUNSI Review Complete Template = ADM - 013 E-RIDS= ADM-03 Document: NRC-2017-0211-DRAFT-0058 Comment on FR Doc# 2017-24734
_ A~d= :J~hl~ c.jec.s:SJ Submitter Information
(!)
't ;J, Pl< 6;Jf:fl.f(f Name: Patrick Bosold 11 /;3/;;~17 General Comment It is almost unbelievable that any regulatory agency would approve thin casks for storage of nuclear waste. The risks are so high and the benefits are so modest and short-sighted that it defies common sense, basic principles of safety engineering and reams of science on the
~~
\\
Dry cask storage that is safe and reliable is already available. Make the power companies, investor-owned utilities and the others who have generated this waste deal with it properly -
and tell them that it is NOT acceptable to use thin cask technology that exposes millions of people to horrific risk for the sake of reduced cost and increased profits.
https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/ getcontent?objectld=0900006482d907 e2&format=xml&showorig=false 01/09/2018