ML18036A199

Comment (80) of Anonymous Regarding Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities

ML18036A199
Person / Time
Site:	San Onofre
Issue date:	01/02/2018
From:	- No Known Affiliation
To:	Rules, Announcements, and Directives Branch
References
82FR52944 00080, NRC-2017-0211
Download: ML18036A199 (2)

Text

---

. ------------------------------------, P"UBLIC SUBMISSION Docket: NRC-2017-0211 As of: 1/9/18 11:01 AM Received:

January 02, 2018 Status: Pending_Post Page 1 of2 Tracking No. lk2-90pg-ew5f Comments Due: January 02, 2018 Submission Type: Web Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities Comment On: NRC-2017-0211-0001 Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facil_ities; Request for Comment on Draft NUREG Doclllment:

NRC-2017-0211-DRAFT-0081 Comment on FR Doc# 2017-24734 SUNSI Review Complete Template = ADM -013 E-RIDS= ADM-03 Add= ~5'",'q,h (J4~ J.._ __ --================================

Submitter Information Name: Anonymous Anonymous

@) 3;. Ff SJ9¥¥ 11/15/;~17 . =-===============================

General Comment I was just notified a few hours ago that the public only has until 9:00 pm tonight to post our comments to the NRC about the review plan for spent fuel dry storage systems. I live within the 50 mile plume zone of SONGS, and implore the NRC to expand the public comment window as we were not given ample public notice on this deadline.

The public looks upon the NRC to protectus from toxic fallout from nuclear waste by requiring companies to uphold the highest safety standards in creating long-term storage for the toxic waste. We expect that the NRC will protect us by requiring SONGS and other nuclear generating stations to store the waste in thick walled canisters that can be monitored and repaired easily to insure not only the publics safety while been stored temporarily but in doing so will make sure that the intact canisters can be moved when a long-term solution for storage becomes available.

It is public knowledge that So Cal Eddison plans to bury the toxic waste 108 feet from our https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/getcontent?objectld=0900006482d908fb&format=xml&showorig=false 01/09/2018 Page 2 of2 coastline, only a few feet above the water table putting the public at high risk if there is a tsunami or if the water table continues to rise. We call upon the NRC to put public safety first and require SCE to move the waste to higher ground at Camp Pendleton.

Please require SCE to move the waste where it is out of the tsunami zone, away from the freeway, and off of an earthquake fault line and deny So Cal Edison's pending license for the ISFSI at San Onofre. We, the people of Southern California, Americans and citizens of the world put our trust in you at the NRC to require the highest possible safety regulations for this extremely lethal, long lasting, radioactive material.

Thank you for putting public safety before special interests.

https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/getcontent?objectid=0900006482d908fb&format=xml&showorig=false 01/09/2018