ML17037B554

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Letter Responding to 04/12/1976 Letter Requesting Information Concerning Potential Feedwater Nozzle Cracking
ML17037B554
Person / Time
Site: Nine Mile Point Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 05/14/1976
From: Rhode G
Niagara Mohawk Power Corp
To: Lear G
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
Download: ML17037B554 (14)


Text

'ICC FoflM 195 DOCVET NUMBEfl

~ I7 70) 50-220 F ILL- NUM OE B

'lIRC DISTBIBVTION Fofl PART 60 DCCI(ET MATEnlAL ro: FROM: DATE OF DOCUMENT MRS GEORGE LEAR 'IAGARA MOHAWK POWER GO,

.5/14/76 h

SYRACUSE~ NEW YORK DATC)I~Cg))F D MR GERALD K RHODE

.ETTEB QNOTOBIZED P BOP INPUT FORM NUMOEB OF COPIES BECEIVED gOBIGINAL JPfUNC LASS IF IE D OCOPV ONE SIGNED

! DESCBIPTION ENCLOSU BE LTD W/ATTACHED RE OUR 4/12/76 LTR ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ;

FURNXSHING REQUES'EED XNFO, RE POTENTIAL

! CRACKING IN REACTOR FEEDWATER NOZZLE BLEND

! .RADII.

I C

. ACKNOWLEI3GEO.

.,PLANT hAIK. Do NOT REMOVE CANINE MILE'POINT 81 SAFETY FOR ACTION/INFORMATION ENVXRO 5 20 76 RJL ASSXGNED AD: ASSXGNED AD :

BPJINCH CHEF: BIUViiCH CIIXE" ~

PPiOJECT I uhNAGEI<: PROJECT HAI:AGER :

LICo PSST.: PARRISH LXC, ASST' INTERNAL D 1ST R I ('UT I ON PILE YP'I'i1MMJVZ mar:Z~rEr: ~CH NRC PDR 'XLV TED f'SC EIYNST X&E C11R01;D BEhIAROYA P.AT.'f,ARD OP!J'D J~<QII/~8 SPANGLER GOSSXCI' STAPP "iERXN

<CiXII XPPOLXTO IPS SITE TECH IACCA'NXGHT Q$ SE OPI'.RATXNG Rl:ACTORS GAh"'IXLL A/At)I', SXIlWI XL STI'J.LO SFI.'LPP PAWI XCKT IiULhtAN OPE.STING TECH PRO JI CT hIANAGI?htl'.IIT ltEACTOR SAI"I'.TY EISPmtUT SITE ANALYSIS BOYD ROSS SHAO VOI.I.IIER P, COLI,XNS NOVAK BARR 13UNCH IIOIISTON PiOSZTOCZY SC!IWENCER J. COLL <<NS PETI'.RSON Cl IECK Citixt:S Iil<EGI'.R MEI.TZ 111'.I.TI'.MI S AT& I I'.

'iXI SAFEl.Y & I.hIVQPi(

S KOVI IOI.T SP,LT/htAN ANALYSIS I,t'I I III'.RG Dt'.N'I'Oht & hIIII.T.I'.I(

L'X'I'I:IINALI) IS I II IIIUI'ION CONTIIOL NUi%1 II( It I.l'I) NA'I,'I, IA13 tilt()OKIIAVI',ht HA'I.'I. LAB Itl'.(l~ V"IE UI t(XlwSON (0 INI )

lg'XC NS IiA I'l)R C() H'l UI 'I'AN'I'8 J('Sl.lt

'.hGiVJ~NV/i9!>

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~

J

NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION NIAGARA

~

4itI>>

MOHAWK 300 ERIE BOULEVARD. WEST SYRACUSE, N. Y. 13202 May l4, l976 Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Attn: Mr. George Lear, Chief Operating Reactors Branch P3 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555 Re: Nine Mile Point Unit' Docket No. 50-220 DPR-63

Dear Mr. Lear:

Your;letter dated April l2, l976 requested information regarding potential cracking in reactor feedwater nozzle blend radii at Nine Mile Point Unit l. The attached information answers the questions contained in your letter.

Very truly yours, NIAGARA',MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION GERALD K. R E Vice President Engineering GKH/sz Attachment

JI Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation Information Concerning Potential Feedwater Nozzle Cracking Nine Mile Point Unit 1 The following numbered items refer to questions contained in a letter from Mr. George Lear (Commission) to Mr. Gerald K. Rhode (Niagara Mohawk) dated April 12, 1976.

If inspection(s) of feedwater nozzle blend radii has (have) been accomplished, supply the following information:

(a) Date of inspection(s)

(b) Inspection method used (c) Inspection results and subsequent actions - number of cracks found; number of cracks which'penetrated the claddihg into the base metal; maximum depth of cracks; general location of worst cracking around each nozzle; method used to remove cracks; cross-sectional area of reinforcement removed at the worst grind-out location; subsequent inspections and results.

(d) If inspection report(s) has (have) been previously submitted to the NRC containing the desired information of (a), (b), and (c), provide reference to the report(s) in lieu of the information in (a), (b), and

,(c) .

~Res esse:

(a) Ultrasonic examinations of reactor feedwater nozzles were performed on

~

April 4, 1976 and April 9, 1976.

(b) Ultrasonic examination methods ~~ere used. The examination on April 4 employed a developmental technique using a 60 degree angle beam from the reactor vessel outer wall. All four feedwater nozzles were examined.

'On April 9, the southeast nozzle was re-examined, using a compound angle beam shear wave technique from the feedwater nozzle outside the vessel.

(c) The April 4 examination of the southeast feedwater nozzle revealed two indications at the clad-nozzle interface which were reportable in accor-dance with the test procedures. Five subsurface indications were found in the other three nozzles; these indications were interpreted as base metal inclusions. The April 9 re-examination of the southeast nozzle revealed no reportable indications.

(d) Not applicable.

~ ~

Il'=""'" " '

If no inspection of feedwater nozzle blend radii has been conducted, provide date inspection is planned and date of next planned refueling outage.

~Res nse:

Not applicable.

uestion 3

.If inspection(s) and repair(s) has (have) been undertaken, provide date of next planned inspection.

Res~ense:

The next inspection is planned during the Spring 1977 refueling outage.

IL ""' ':

Provide the number of startup/shutdown cycles to the date of the inspection, if already accomplished, and the number of cycles since such inspection. If no inspection has been conducted, provide the estimated number of cycles at the planned inspection date. A startup/shutdown cycle* is defined as a power increase from zero and subsequent return to zero.

~Res onse:

One-hundred (100) startup/shutdown cycles occurred from initial reactor operation to the ultrasonic examination performed on April 4. Subsequent to that examination, one and one-half (1 1/2) cycles have occurred.

uestion 5:

Describe actions taken or planned to m'nimize'cold, intermittent feedwater'flow to the reactor pressure vessel. Include changes in operating procedures and any redesign of feedwater heaters, pumps, flow control valves, piping etc.

~Res esse:

A principal cause of cold intermittent feedwater flow to the reactor vessel is the "jogging" of feedwater pumps during plant startups. This practice is not used at Nine Mile Point Unit l. During reactor startups efforts are made to maximize the. steaming rate. The various drains to the condenser hotwell are opened as. early as possible. These practices maximize the rate of feedwater flow, thus avoiding rapid introduction of cold feedwater to the hot nozzles. During hot standby operation the low feedwater flow condition is avoided. Maintaining feedwater flow avoids potential thermal transients to the nozzles associated with

'ncreasing cold feedwater flow from the low flow condition.

a I)

Describe reactor pressure vessel pressure-temperature limits for operating conditions and especially for the inservice-hydrostatic and leak tests.

~Res ense:

Reactor pressure vessel minimum temperature limits as a function of reactor internal pressure have been calculated for hydrostatic leak tests and power operation based on postulated feedwater nozzle flaws, as discussed below.

Operating procedures are being developed to implement these limits, which are

,,shown in Figure l.

Hinimum pressurization temperatures were calculated using the criteria of Appendix G of Section III of the ASHE Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code,(19I4 Edition, Winter 1975 Addenda) and the following conservative bases:

A postulated flaw size of 2-inches deep was assumed. This value is slightly greater than the 1/4 T reference flaw size recommended by the Code and is significantly greater than would be expected based on crack growth analyses and ultrasonic examinations.

2. The A336 nozzle forging material was assumed to have an RTNDT of +40 0 F.

This value is the maximum value permitted by the vessel procurement, specification and is greater than would be expected for this forging material, particularly in the region from the nozzle surface to the 1/4 T point the location of the postulated flaw.

3. Pressure stresses and stress intensity factor, K , were determined using data presented in Welding Research Council (WRC) Bulletin 175, "PVRC Recommendations on Toughness Requirements for Ferritic Haterials."

Figure A5-1, for a 2:1 bi-axial stress field. (These data are more con-servative than those recommended in WRC 175 for nozzle corner flaws.)

In applying the criteria of Appendix G of Section III, it was conservatively assumed that the total peak pressure stress is primary, while in fact, the total pressure stress includes secondary and peak stresses as well as primary stresses.

A t

FIGURE 1

~

HINIHUH REACTOR VESSEL TEHPERATURE

~ .

FOR llYDROSTATIC TESTING AND IlEATUP OR COOLDOWN 200 llEATUP OR CO OLDOWN

  • 150 YDROST ATIC T ESTING 100 g ~0 0

0 200 400 ,600 800 1000 1200 REACTOR PRESSURE (PSIG)

Hinimum temperature shall be 40 F higher when the core is critical.

I

(