ML17034A356
| ML17034A356 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Byron, Braidwood  |
| Issue date: | 02/02/2017 |
| From: | Miranda S - No Known Affiliation |
| To: | Joel Wiebe Plant Licensing Branch III |
| References | |
| 2.206 | |
| Download: ML17034A356 (1) | |
Text
Wiebe, Joel From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
- Joel, Samuel Miranda <sm0973@gmail.com>
Thursday, February 02, 2017 10:44 AM Wiebe, Joel
[External_Sender] Re: RE: Re: November 15, 2016, Enfo~cement Petition Regarding Exelon's*Byron and Braidwood Stations Byron-Ch-15-ML14363A495-IOECCS.pdf; P-2206-mtg.docx.
Thank you for the opportunity to present my petition, yesterday. *1 could have go on much longer; but I didn't want to put everyone to sleep. I think the petition is robust, and full of references, for those who wish to read it. For your reference, and distribution, I have attached a copy of my presentation, including the-two handouts. I think you will see that the presentation supplements the petition.
I have also attached a copy of the Byron & Braidwood UFSAR chapter regarding the IOECCS. Page 15.5-2 lists the three requirement~ that the analyses must meet, and page 15.5-8 (reference 5) points to the water relief test report that states the tests that Byron & Braidwood relies upon to "qualify" their PSVs were not done (Section 4.2.3, in.the report). I think these will establish the Licensee's written commitment, and its failure to meet it. This information pertains to Sara Kirkwood's questions.
My position, in one sentence, is that _qualifying the PSVs for water relief, will do nothing to show that the non-escalation requirement is satisfied. *
- Regards, Sam Miranda
__.. /; '>-:-_,___ ----
- ,.*
- :-~,,_-.
~------