ML16217A399

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Information Request to Support Upcoming Problem Identification and Resolution Inspection 05000266/2016007 and 05000301/2016007
ML16217A399
Person / Time
Site: Point Beach  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 08/04/2016
From: Jamnes Cameron
Reactor Projects Region 3 Branch 4
To: Coffey R
Point Beach
References
IR 2016007
Download: ML16217A399 (9)


See also: IR 05000266/2016007

Text

UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION III

2443 WARRENVILLE RD. SUITE 210

LISLE, IL 60532-4352

August 4, 2016

Mr. Robert Coffey

Site Vice President

NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC

6610 Nuclear Road

Two Rivers, WI 54241

SUBJECT: INFORMATION REQUEST TO SUPPORT UPCOMING PROBLEM

IDENTIFICATION AND RESOLUTION INSPECTION AT POINT BEACH NUCLEAR

PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2

Dear Mr. Coffey:

This letter is to request information to support our scheduled problem identification and

resolution (PI&R) inspection beginning October 31, 2016, at Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1

and 2. This inspection will be performed in accordance with the Nuclear Regulatory

Commission (NRC) baseline Inspection Procedure 71152.

Experience has shown that these inspections are extremely resource intensive both for the

NRC inspectors and the utility staff. In order to minimize the impact that the inspection has on

the site and to ensure a productive inspection, we have enclosed a list of documents required

for the inspection.

The documents requested are copies of action requests/condition reports (AR/CRs) and lists of

information necessary to ensure the inspection team is adequately prepared for the inspection.

The information requested prior to the inspection may be provided in electronic format by either

a CD, DVD, or a website and should be provided for NRC review by October 17, 2016.

Mr. John Rutkowski, the Lead Inspector, will contact your staff to determine the best method of

providing the requested information.

If there are any questions about the material requested, or the inspection in general, please

contact Mr. Rutkowski at 630-829-9730 or john.rutkowski@nrc.gov.

This letter does not contain new or amended information collection requirements subject

to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Existing information

collection requirements were approved by the Office of Management and Budget,

Control Number 3150-0011.

R. Coffey -2-

The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a

request for information or an information collection requirement unless the requesting

document displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget control number.

In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 2.390 of the NRC's

Rules of Practice, a copy of this letter and its enclosure will be available electronically for

public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records

(PARS) component of NRC's document system (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC

Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).

Sincerely,

/RA/

Jamnes L. Cameron, Chief

Branch 4

Division of Reactor Projects

Docket Nos: 50-266; 50-301

License Nos: DPR-24; DPR-27

Enclosure: Requested Information to

Support PI&R Inspection

cc: Distribution via LISTSERV

Requested Information to Support

Problem Identification and Resolution (PI&R) Inspection

Inspection Report 05000266-05000301/2016007

Please provide the information, if not provided via an accessible website, on a disc (one

for the team lead, one for the Resident Inspector Office, and one for each of the two other

scheduled inspectors), if possible. Unless otherwise specified, the time frame for

requested information is for the period of May 1, 2015, through the time the data request

is answered. For requested lists please provide the information, if possible, in a

sortable Excel spreadsheet format. If lists are provided in a sortable format the sort

preference in the following items is not required as long as all of the requested

information is provided.

In addition, inspectors will require computer access to the corrective action program

(CAP) database while on site and, if possible, internet service.

PROGRAM DOCUMENTS

1. A current copy of administrative procedure(s) for the corrective action program (CAP),

quality assurance audit program, self-assessment program, corrective action

effectiveness review program, trending program, industry experience review program,

maintenance rule program and top-level documents for the work control programs, work

scheduling programs, and aging management program(s).

2. A current copy of the Employee Concerns Program/Ombudsman administrative

procedure(s).

3. Description of any substantive changes made to the corrective action program

philosophy or operation since the last biennial PI&R Inspection in June 2015. Please

include with each listed substantive change the effective date of the change.

Administrative and non-substantive changes do not need to be listed.

ASSESSMENTS

4. A copy of Quality Assurance (QA) audits of the CAP and self-assessment process and, if

done, audits of the QA program.

5. A list of all other QA audits completed with a brief description of areas audited. Indicate

where findings requiring corrective action were identified.

6. A copy of completed assessments of the CAP program, the QA program, and the

self-assessment program.

7. A copy of your schedule for future assessments, out to no more than two years. Include

the plan/schedule for future self-assessments of the CAP, QA program, and assessment

process.

8. A list of all other self-assessments completed with a brief description. Indicate which

assessments resulted in AR/CRs for adverse findings. Please include, if appropriate,

the AR/CR number for the assessments.

Enclosure

CORRECTIVE ACTION DOCUMENTS

9. A list of completed root cause evaluations completed with a brief description of the issue

and open date and date of latest status. Provide status (i.e. open, closed, deferred,

etc.), if not part of the root cause package, of any actions developed as part of the

evaluations and a reference to the documents and/or ARs/CRs directing and tracking the

actions.

10. A list of completed apparent cause evaluations completed with a brief description of the

issue and open date and date of latest status. Provide status of any actions developed

(i.e. open, closed, deferred, etc.), if not part of the apparent cause package, and a

reference, to the documents and/or AR/CRs directing and tracking the actions. Please

identify if the apparent cause evaluations were full/detailed/in-depth or limited-scope

evaluations.

11. A list of all open AR/CRs sorted by significance level and then initiation date. Include

each reports identification number, the date initiated, a brief description/title of the issue,

system affected if any, significance level, priority level, assigned organization, and

anticipated completion date, if available. Indicate if the CR was associated with a

refueling outage activity.

12. A list of AR/CRs closed since April 1, 2016, sorted by significance level and then

initiation date. Include each documents identification number, a brief description/title,

the significance level, the priority level, the date initiated and closed, assigned

organization, cause codes assigned, and whether there was an associated operability

evaluation. Indicate if the CR was associated with a refueling outage activity.

13. A list of AR/CRs generated by the corporate office that involve or affect Point Beachs

operation, sorted by significance level. Include the date initiated, a brief description/title

of the issue, other site(s) affected, system affected, significance level, status, assigned

organization, and closure date or anticipated completion date, if available.

14. A list of completed effectiveness reviews of AR/CR-developed remedial and corrective

actions. Include a descriptive title for the review(s). Include a cross-reference to the

AR/CR or AR/CRs for which the effectiveness review was conducted and, if applicable,

AR/CR numbers documenting any additional follow-up actions.

15. A list of AR/CRs initiated for identified inadequate or ineffective corrective or remedial

actions. Include the date initiated, a brief description, status (i.e. open, closed, deferred,

etc.), significance level of the issue, system affected, assigned organization, priority level

to correct, completion/closure date or, if applicable, anticipated completion date, if

available. Include a cross-reference to the AR/CR, AR/CRs, or evaluation that

generated the original corrective action.

16. A copy of any performance reports or indicators used to track the corrective action

program effectiveness since 2014. The most recent data and 2015 end-of-year data will

suffice; monthly or quarterly reports are not required.

2

TRENDS

17. A list of initiated ARs/CRs that identify trends of conditions adverse to quality. Include

the date initiated, a brief description, significance level, priority level for each item, and

date closed or anticipated closure date.

18. Copies of any completed trend reports that are associated with overall CAP performance

and/or effectiveness. If done on a periodic basis, provide the most recent report and end

of year 2015 reports.

OPERATING EXPERIENCE

19. A copy of the most recent operating experience program effectiveness review and/or

assessment and/or QA audit.

20. A list of operating experience documents reviewed (after initial preliminary screening)

and any associated AR/CRs. Please provide identification of the originating

organization, the initiating organizations document/reference number, your identification

number if different than the originators, a brief description/title of the issue, and status of

the review and any developed follow-up actions. Indicate the initiation date and the

closure date or the anticipated closure date if available.

SYSTEMS AND COMPONENTS

21. A list of the top ten risk significant systems and top ten risk significant components.

22. A list of operability determinations/evaluations. Include a brief description/title of the

issue, date initiated, date closed or date anticipated to be closed. Include any operability

evaluations that are still open and that were initiated prior to May 1, 2015.

23. A listing of systems and components considered Maintenance Rule (a)(1) at any time

since May 1, 2015. Provide copies of the applicable system health report sections and

maintenance rule action plans for those systems starting one year earlier from when the

system or component entered (a)(1) status. Include dates when system/components

entered (a)(1) status and, if applicable, returned to (a)(2) status. For recurring reports,

the most recent and end-of-year reports are sufficient; monthly or quarterly reports are

not required.

24. A list of test failures (IST or Technical Specifications surveillances) with a brief

description of component/system failed. Indicate if the failure was a maintenance

preventable failure. Include any failures of test equipment calibrations that necessitated

a review of past surveillances and/or tests. Include in the listing the AR/CR number(s)

applicable to the failures.

25. A list of temporary modifications with a brief description of the modification, installation

date, and date closed or anticipated closure date. Include any open temporary

modifications that were installed prior to May 1, 2015.

26. A list of rework items and repeat failures. Include cross-references to applicable Work

Orders and AR/CRs.

3

27. A list of plant trips, unplanned downpowers (greater than 20 percent), unplanned LCO

entries (not scheduled), and LERs, including dates of these events.

28. A list of open work orders/equipment work requests with a brief description. Identify the

work order as outage or non-outage, the date of initiation and scheduled or anticipated

closure date, if available. Also provide the classification of the work orders with the

recent industry classification scheme. Provide an explanation of the classification

scheme and the procedure governing the classification. Work requests/work orders not

associated with a degraded equipment condition (e.g. work orders for voluntary plant

upgrades) do not have to be included in the list.

29. A copy of any trend reports for work orders. The most recent trend reports and those

that existed at the end-of-year 2015; copies of monthly reports are not required. Include

a copy of a recent (within two months of the data submittal) graph or document showing

the status of work week planning of work activities.

30. A list of open procedure change requests showing initiation date, title of change or

procedure title (whichever is more relevant), status, responsible department, procedure

number, priority assigned, and your identification number. Please provide an

explanation of your priority system for procedures and from that priority, if applicable,

when the request might be completed.

31. A list of procedure change requests that were completed, canceled, or otherwise

dispositioned since May 1, 2016. Please indicate the action taken on those requests.

Please include title, youre tracking number, and the date initiated and the date closed or

otherwise dispositioned.

SCWE

32. Copy of the results of safety culture and/or safety conscious work environment

(SCWE) surveys or self-assessments completed since January 1, 2015. Include any

organizational effectiveness surveys conducted by internal or external organizations.

Include a listing of any action(s) resulting from the survey(s) and the status of the

action(s).

33. SCWE issues identified through alternate avenues, such as the employee concerns

programs. If issue(s) are considered sensitive, in lieu of describing issue in the data

package, provide a paper copy to the lead inspector at the start of the inspection.

REGULATORY ISSUES

34. Copies of all apparent, common and/or root cause evaluations initiated to address

identified adverse human performance trends or safety culture adverse trends.

35. Copies of ARs/CRs, investigations (ACE or RCE), and corrective actions taken for

issues identified in NRC findings initiated since March 1, 2015. Identify the status of the

corrective actions and any effectiveness reviews completed or scheduled. Include a

copy of effectiveness reviews that were done. Include a cross-reference to the NRC

identification number (report number and item number).

4

36. A listing showing the status of actions (corrective actions, effectiveness reviews, etc) that

were not closed as of July 1, 2015, and that were or are associated with RCE 01883633

and RCE 01896156. In the listing provide a short title, the present status (open, closed,

cancelled, etc.) and the closure or cancelation date or if still open the scheduled or

anticipated closure date.

ADMIN

37. A copy of the latest Point Beach organizational chart (showing names and including

hourly personnel) and a phone listing.

38. A list of the dates, times, and location for all scheduled meetings associated with the

implementation of the CAP. Include any work order screening meetings.

5-YEAR REVIEW

  • NOTE: Requests in Items 39 through 42 refer to the following items and

reports associated with electronic components (circuit boards, relays, circuit

board sub-components, etc): within the Reactor Protection System and

Engineering Safety Features Actuation System.

39. An excel sortable list of AR/CRs associated with the above listed items going back to

October 1, 2011. Please indicate in the list the status of the AR/CR (e.g. open, closed,

working, etc.), initiation date, closure date, number of developed corrective actions and

indication if any remain open, the classification/priority, and a descriptive title of the

AR/CR.

40. A copy of site performance indicators (PIs), if any, associated with the above listed items

going back to 2011. Only need to provide a copy of any recurring PIs for end of year

documents for 2015, 2014, etc. Also include a copy of the latest PI data.

41. A copy of the System Health report sections, or equivalent documents, for the above

listed systems (and items if separately tracked), as they were presented in the fourth

quarter reports/end-of-year of each year starting in 2011 until the current date. Provide

a copy of the most recent report.

42. A copy of any Maintenance Rule Action plans (a)(1) action plans with completion status

for the above listed items, that were developed since October 1, 2011.

Documents requested to be available on-site during the inspection in either paper or electronic,

with search capability, (preferred) format:

a. Updated Final Safety Analysis Report.

b. Technical Specifications.

c. Procedures and procedure index.

d. Copies of any self-assessments and associated ARs/CRs generated in preparation for

this inspection.

5

e. A copy of the QA manual.

f. A list of issues brought to the ECP/ombudsman and the actions taken for resolution.

g. A list of the codes used in the CAP and Work Orders system(s).

h. A copy of the most recent monthly performance indicator document and the system

health report or the equivalent documents and a copy of the equivalent documents from

the end of 2015.

i. A copy of the latest independent/offsite organization review of safety culture/safety

conscious work environment and organizational effectiveness and internal equivalent

assessments if not provided as part of the requested data package.

j. A copy of the maintenance rule scoping document containing licensee-established

system and/or component performance goals and criteria for moving an item into

maintenance rule (a)(1) status.

OTHER

On the first day of the inspection, or early on the second day, please provide the inspection

team a briefing of your CAP including an overview of your actions, if any, associated with recent

industry efforts to improve the efficiency of the CAP (e.g. cumulative effects/nuclear promise

initiative(s)). Include your expectations for personnel using the CAP and how the work order

system fits into the overall scheme for addressing identified issues. Also please demonstrate

how to use a computer to access CAP data.

On the first day of the inspection, or early on the second day, please also provide the inspection

team a briefing on the operations human performance recovery plan and its status.

The lead inspector will also request to talk to/interview approximately 20 to 40 personnel, in

groups of 4 to 8 individuals, to seek information about the plants SCWE. The lead inspector will

randomly choose, from your furnished organization charts, people he would like to interview and

provide those names and groupings to you and ask you to set up times and locations. For this

the inspector will need access to organizations charts showing position titles and names. The

inspector will provide his selections at least one day prior to a suggested interview date. Each

interview session will last about 40 to 70 minutes; the inspector will ask you to schedule the

interview sessions at least 90 minutes apart.

The inspector will ask you to refrain from debriefing personnel after the interviews; your briefing

of personnel prior to the sessions is acceptable but not required. Also other team members

may be talking to personnel about your peoples perception of the sites SCWE and CAP

effectiveness.

6

R. Coffey -2-

The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a

request for information or an information collection requirement unless the requesting

document displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget control number.

In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 2.390 of the NRC's

Rules of Practice, a copy of this letter and its enclosure will be available electronically for

public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records

(PARS) component of NRC's document system (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC

Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).

Sincerely,

/RA/

Jamnes L. Cameron, Chief

Branch 4

Division of Reactor Projects

Docket Nos: 50-266; 50-301

License Nos: DPR-24; DPR-27

Enclosure: Requested Information to

Support PI&R Inspection

cc: Distribution via LISTSERV

DISTRIBUTION:

Jeremy Bowen Allan Barker

RidsNrrDorlLpl3-1 Resource Carole Ariano

RidsNrrPMPointBeach Linda Linn

RidsNrrDirsIrib Resource DRPIII

Cynthia Pederson DRSIII

Darrell Roberts ROPassessment.Resource@nrc.gov

Richard Skokowski

ADAMS Accession Number: ML16217A399

Publicly Available Non-Publicly Available Sensitive Non-Sensitive

OFFICE RIII RIII RIII RIII

NAME JCameron:bw

DATE 08/04/2016

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY