ML15126A213

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
2014 Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant Initial License Examination Form Es 301-4
ML15126A213
Person / Time
Site: Prairie Island  Xcel Energy icon.png
Issue date: 05/19/2014
From:
Region 3 Administrator
To:
Northern States Power Co, Xcel Energy
References
Download: ML15126A213 (1)


Text

ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Facilty: PRAIRIE ISLAND Date of Exam: AUGUST 2014 Scenario Numbers: 1 12131415 Operating Test No.: Pl-ILT-NRC-14 QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Initials a b* c#

f~J.',

1. The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events.  :~:/,71 Ii)**:.../ *,q 1(c

(//(:~

2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events. 5~~~l',i ,:;~""'"" 1ti;;~
3. Each event description consists of
  • the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated
  • the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event
  • the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew ~J},.
  • the expected operator actions (by shift position) I/If"";
  • the event termination point (if applicable)

JZt')".)

4. No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event. "/;;M'" 1r~f/~
5. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics. ~;;;:r} ILdh/ lr);{ r.
6. Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.
  • '.;~;<>f/' ~~;;

"%'.*~)

7. If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.

Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints.

i;Sll'i ./(}"' rii~;;lt~

Cues are given.

8. The simulator modeling is not altered. ~,-'! ,~;1*;.;;Y ~-r :~2,

)~\]~*-

9. The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated *1****

to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios. iii)(~~;

,:'°f3('

10. Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario.

All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section D.5 of ES-301. ki1'*'*'/ ¥!,.,id,~"'~

11. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the form along with the simulator scenarios). ~S":>.'J .:::.;;;."/ ti;:.~:

t:';.5.*i

12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).  ;~l:J <in/ l;7s:;:g
13. Li~}/ l)f:lJ:_;)o ~*

The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position. ~5j'l:.1 Target Quantitative Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section 0.5.d) Actual Attributes -- -- --

SEG # 1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5

1. Total malfunctions (5-8) 516151515 *'971 ~*~;;>;;./ '/)7~'~

Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 213111312 lc,in** IJ,J1f ~ ,.

2. :So'1
3. Abnormal events (2-4) 213121214 jr)'! k,;?71/*/ 111-t?Z)
4. Major transients (1-2) 1/1/1/1/1 ~~**01  !~;,;.,,,.} ~NG~:
5. EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) 212131212 :1::;vJ l*;:.:';fY{/ r1rJ~~~
6. EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2) 0/0/1/1/0 s*::7*s k;~r,vi/, ~Jt~:'.~ .
7. Critical tasks (2-3) 212121414 ~[:11 I*':~~'"""* r}.f~: