|
---|
Category:E-Mail
MONTHYEARML22348A0322022-11-30030 November 2022 NRR E-mail Capture - Request to Resume Endangered Species Act Section 7 Consultation for Decommissioning of San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3 ML22348A0532022-11-30030 November 2022 NRC to National Marine Fisheries Service (Nmfs), Request to Resume Endangered Species Act Consultation for Decommissioning of San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3 ML22278A0182022-10-0404 October 2022 (SONGS) Unit 2 Reactor Head and Closure of Commitments Related to Peaceful Use of Foreign Technology- Acknowledge Receipt ML22265A2122022-09-22022 September 2022 Request for Additional Information for Exemption Request from 100m 72.106(B) Requirement, Docket Nos 50-206, 50-361, and 50-362 ML22119A2422022-04-29029 April 2022 Riv FOLLOW-UP Response: Question About April 11 San Onofre Event ML22034A9962022-02-0202 February 2022 S. Morris Response to C. Langley-Questions About Moving Snf at San Onfre ML21280A1022021-12-0606 December 2021 NRC to NMFS, Supplement to Request to Reinitiate Endangered Species Act Consultation for San Onofre Decommissioning ML21277A2342021-09-30030 September 2021 NMFS to NRC, Receipt of Request to Reinitiate Endangered Species Act Consultation for San Onofre Decommissioning ML21242A0602021-09-30030 September 2021 NRC to NMFS, Request to Initiate Consultation for SONGS Decommissioning ML21117A3492021-03-30030 March 2021 March 30, 2021, Email from Public Watchdogs on Providing New Information to Its October 13, 2020, 2.206 Petition ML21069A2482021-03-10010 March 2021 Umax, 07200054, 05000361, 05000362, FSAR Revision 4 for San Onofre ISFSI ML21068A2712021-03-0909 March 2021 Request for Additional Information Regarding Biological Opinion - SONGS- EPID L-2021-LLL-0006 ML20343A1292020-12-0808 December 2020 NRR E-mail Capture - Request for Additional Information ML20302A3252020-10-21021 October 2020 E-Mail: Acknowledgement of Receipt to the Petitioner Regarding SCE Use of Hi-Storm at SONGS ML20233A7342020-08-18018 August 2020 LTR-20-0313 David Victor, San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS) Community Engagement Panel, Chair, Et Al., Letter Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Security at SONGS and Recent SONGS Community Engagement Panel Meeting on O ML20224A0172020-08-0707 August 2020 8-7-20 Corrected Hearing Time - Intervenor SCEs Acknowledgement of Oral Argument Notice (9th Cir.)(Case No. 20-70899) ML20224A0182020-08-0707 August 2020 8-7-20 Intervenor SCEs Acknowledgement of Oral Argument Notice (9th Cir.)(Case No. 20-70899) ML20204B0782020-07-22022 July 2020 Donna Gilmore Email Holtec Umax Materials (07200054, 05000361, 05000362) ML20198M4522020-07-15015 July 2020 Supplement to Public Watchdogs 2.206 Petition ML20163A3402020-05-0505 May 2020 Email Transmission - Peaceful Use Commitments State Dept for SONGS Rx Heads and Steam Generators ML20120A0282020-04-28028 April 2020 4-28-20 Notice of Addition of James Adler as Attorney for NRC (9th Cir.)(Case No. 20-70899) ML20076A5742020-03-11011 March 2020 Response to A.Mcnally San Onofre Canisters (LTR-20-0003) ML20062F5762020-02-28028 February 2020 Public Watchdogs 10 CFR 2.206 Petition - NRC E-mail to Petitioner Regarding Petition Screening Results February 28, 2020 ML20063M3092020-02-28028 February 2020 Public Watchdogs 10 CFR 2.206 Petition - Response from Petitioner to NRC E-mail Regarding Petition Screening Results, February 28, 2020 ML20059M2292020-02-25025 February 2020 OEDO-20-00053 2.206 Petition - Flooding Likely to Create Radioactive Geysers at SONGS ML20049A0802020-02-14014 February 2020 Public Watchdogs 10 CFR 2.206 Petition - E-mail to Petitioner on Immediate Actions Request Determination February 14, 2020 ML20007E5342020-01-0606 January 2020 Oceansiders Initial Assessment & Public Meeting Response E-Mail ML20006D7012019-12-23023 December 2019 Public Watchdogs 10 CFR 2.206 Petition SONGS - Petitioner Request for Public Meeting and NRC Response - December 23, 2019 ML19354B6762019-12-20020 December 2019 2.206 Petition Initial Assessment Notification E-Mail ML19325C5902019-11-20020 November 2019 2.206 Petition Status Notification Email ML19326B2392019-11-18018 November 2019 Public Watchdogs 10 CFR 2.206 Petition SONGS - Screened-in and PRB November 18, 2019 ML19319B6262019-11-0808 November 2019 Oceansiders 2.206 Petition Immediate Action Response E-Mail ML19326A7122019-10-30030 October 2019 Public Watchdogs 10 CFR 2.206 Petition - SONGS Receipt of Exhibits October 30, 2019 ML19326A9692019-10-25025 October 2019 Public Watchdogs 10 CFR 2.206 Petition - SONGS Immediate Action Determination October 25, 2019 ML19326A3602019-10-23023 October 2019 Public Watchdogs 10 CFR 2.206 Petition - SONGS First E-mail to Petitioner October 23, 2019 ML19284B3232019-10-0808 October 2019 Response LTR-19-0351 Kalene Walker, E-mail Concerns About Critical Safety Problems with Holtec Nuclear Waste Storage System at San Onofre ML19344C7842019-09-0303 September 2019 Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 09-03-2019 RSCS ML19344C7212019-08-30030 August 2019 Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 08-30-2019 J Steinmetz ML19217A1862019-08-0202 August 2019 E-Mail from M. Layton/Nrc to K. Walker/Public San Onofre - SONGS Special Inspection - Damaged Canisters ML19214A1362019-08-0202 August 2019 Riv Pao Response to Mr. Langley Response to Inquiry ML19221B4122019-07-30030 July 2019 Southern California Edison Company, Southern California Nuclear Generating Station, E-mail from Charles Langley to Scott Morris, NRC, Redundant Drop Protection Features at SONGS ML19213A1072019-07-29029 July 2019 Reply to Mr. Langley Re. Redundant Drop Protection Feature at SONGS ML19210D4292019-07-29029 July 2019 E-Mail from M. Layton/Nrc to D. Gilmore/Public Reply to E-Mail Questions ML19210D4342019-07-11011 July 2019 Curtiss-Wright SAS - 10 CFR Part 21 Reporting of Defects for Introl Positioner 890265-010 ML19190A0432019-06-28028 June 2019 Discusses Proprietary Information for Curtiss-Wright SAS - 10 CFR Part 21 Reporting of Defects for Introl Positioner 890265-010 - Cw SAS Initial Report No. 10CFR21-48 ML19165A1102019-06-11011 June 2019 SONGS Webinar (6-3-2019) Message - Sarah Akerson ML19190A0442019-06-0707 June 2019 10 CFR Part 21 Reporting of Defects for Introl Positioner 890265-010 - Cw SAS Initial Report No. 10CFR21-48 ML19158A4432019-06-0404 June 2019 Southern California Edison Company; Scratches on Nuclear Storage Canisters at San Onofre Pose No Problems, NRC Says After Its Own Analysis - Orange County Register ML19156A1422019-06-0404 June 2019 LTR-19-0218 Donna Gilmore, Sanonofresafety.Org, E-mail Scratches on Nuclear Storage Canisters at San Onofre ML19158A1312019-05-31031 May 2019 Paragon Energy Systems LLC -10 CFR Part 21 Report of Defect GS2 Terry Turbine Introl Positioners 2022-09-22
[Table view] |
Text
Joosten, Sandy From: Ace Hoffman < rhoffman@animatedsoftware.com >
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2014 12:28 PM
Subject:
Rogue pilots and spent fuel equals a potential nuclear disaster...
March 25th, 2014
Dear Readers,
Tonight in San Clemente, California, Southern California Edison will be holding the first "community engagement panel" to allow the public to learn about, and provide input to, the decommissioning process.
An article this morning at the Southern California Public Radio web site prompted the following comments.
Ace Hoffman Carlsbad, CA In response to:
http://www.scpr.org/news/2014/03/25/43013/groups-concerned-about-nuclear-waste-storage-at-sa/
The "spent" nuclear fuel at Sa nO is very difficult to handle right now: It's "poisoned" (the technical term) with fission products (like strontium and cesium) which are extremely hazardous if they escape, and which produce a lot of heat within the fuel rods themselves as they decay.
The danger subsides substantially over the next few decades, and then over the next few hundred years, but --
mainly because of the plutonium in the fuel -- it will remain extremely hazardous for hundreds of thousands of years. A single fuel rod, were its contents to escape into the local community due to, for example, a fire or terrorist's action, would make all of San Clemente and probably all of Camp Pendleton uninhabitable. And there are hundreds of thousands of fuel rods in 2,776 fuel assemblies at SanO.
Making this stuff in the first place was a horrific mistake and now we can plainly see why: Because even without a meltdown like at Fukushima, we are left with one of the most hazardous piles of poison on the planet
-- right in the middle of an earthquake/tsunami zone and a population of tens of millions of people! A rogue pilot flying a large jet -- as we have now seen time and again -- could make all of southern California uninhabitable, all our property worthless, and make millions of us refugees and survivors, and murder tens of thousands of people, condemning them to death by cancer or even by acute radiation poisoning.
The term "cooled" to describe spent fuel is relative: The cask temperatures are well above the boiling point of water, which means steam can be created, which can damage the zirconium alloy cladding around the fuel pellets, releasing hydrogen and causing an explosion. Likely? No. Possible? Perhaps. A complex and time-consuming drying process is repeated several times to remove as much water as possible before the casks are welded shut, but still, there will be several gallons of water in a typical dry cask AFTER the process is completed. It's hanging out in the microscopic cracks and crevices of the zirconium fuel rods, which were cracked from the heat, vibration, and pressure variations within the reactor. The alloys embrittle, crack, and, possibly: fail. High burn-up fuel is particularly susceptible to embrittlement, and all high burn-up fuel should be treated as damaged even if no detectable damage is found when the fuel assemblies are loaded into dry casks. (Every assembly should be "canned," which is only required for damaged assemblies by the NRC.) The detection equipment for detecting damaged fuel assemblies is grossly inadequate, but many assemblies are known to be damaged.
1
Dry casks should be behind earthen berms -- large ones! and be scattered so at most only one dry cask could be damaged by a terrorist-- and one is too many, there's no doubt about that.
But still, the most important safety improvement would be to close the other reactors nearby: Diablo Canyon is not so far away that a meltdown there would not affect us, and nor is Palo Verde, near Phoenix, AZ. And nor are the nuclear reactors in San Diego Bay exempt from meltdown: They are, however, much more robust (and their fuel, when it is finally removed, is much more hazardous ... ).
Ace Hoffman Carlsbad, CA
========================================
A 2-minute video:
Spent fuel composition by Ace Hoffman (based on Sorensen):
http://youtu. be/2m2sr78g9ul But where is this video?
Ace Hoffman speaking at the Shut San Onofre rally March 11, 2012 :
You Tube says:
Rejected (content inappropriate)
Please sign my petition to get this video reinstated:
http://www. thepetitionsite. com/ 161 /349/695/i-want -my-video-back-up-on-you-tube/
Ace Hoffman, computer programmer, author, The Code Killers:
An Expose of the Nuclear Industry Free download: acehoffman.org Blog: acehoffman.blogspot.com YouTube: youtube.com/user/AceHoffman Phone: (760) 720-7261 Address: PO Box 1936, Carlsbad, CA 92018 Subscribe to my free newsletter today!
Email: ace [at] acehoffman.org To unsubscribe:
Send "Unsubscribe" in subject line.
Note: This communication may have been intercepted in secret, without permission, and in violation of our right to privacy by the National Security Agency or some other agency or private contractor.
2