|
|---|
Category:E-Mail
MONTHYEARML24017A2432024-01-15015 January 2024
LTR-24-0008 Paul Blanch, E-mails Request for Formal Response to Requests for Meeting to Discuss Safety Issues with NRC Staff
ML22348A0322022-11-30030 November 2022
NRR E-mail Capture - Request to Resume Endangered Species Act Section 7 Consultation for Decommissioning of San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3
ML22348A0532022-11-30030 November 2022
NRC to National Marine Fisheries Service (Nmfs), Request to Resume Endangered Species Act Consultation for Decommissioning of San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3
ML22278A0182022-10-0404 October 2022
(SONGS) Unit 2 Reactor Head and Closure of Commitments Related to Peaceful Use of Foreign Technology- Acknowledge Receipt
ML22265A2122022-09-22022 September 2022
Request for Additional Information for Exemption Request from 100m 72.106(B) Requirement, Docket Nos 50-206, 50-361, and 50-362
ML22119A2422022-04-29029 April 2022
Riv FOLLOW-UP Response: Question About April 11 San Onofre Event
ML22034A9962022-02-0202 February 2022
S. Morris Response to C. Langley-Questions About Moving Snf at San Onfre
ML21280A1022021-12-0606 December 2021
NRC to NMFS, Supplement to Request to Reinitiate Endangered Species Act Consultation for San Onofre Decommissioning
ML21277A2342021-09-30030 September 2021
NMFS to NRC, Receipt of Request to Reinitiate Endangered Species Act Consultation for San Onofre Decommissioning
ML21242A0602021-09-30030 September 2021
NRC to NMFS, Request to Initiate Consultation for SONGS Decommissioning
ML21117A3492021-03-30030 March 2021
March 30, 2021, Email from Public Watchdogs on Providing New Information to Its October 13, 2020, 2.206 Petition
ML21069A2482021-03-10010 March 2021
Umax, 07200054, 05000361, 05000362, FSAR Revision 4 for San Onofre ISFSI
ML21068A2712021-03-0909 March 2021
Request for Additional Information Regarding Biological Opinion - SONGS- EPID L-2021-LLL-0006
ML20343A1292020-12-0808 December 2020
NRR E-mail Capture - Request for Additional Information
ML20302A3252020-10-21021 October 2020
E-Mail: Acknowledgement of Receipt to the Petitioner Regarding SCE Use of Hi-Storm at SONGS
ML20233A7342020-08-18018 August 2020
LTR-20-0313 David Victor, San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS) Community Engagement Panel, Chair, Et Al., Letter Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Security at SONGS and Recent SONGS Community Engagement Panel Meeting on O
ML20224A0172020-08-0707 August 2020
8-7-20 Corrected Hearing Time - Intervenor SCEs Acknowledgement of Oral Argument Notice (9th Cir.)(Case No. 20-70899)
ML20224A0182020-08-0707 August 2020
8-7-20 Intervenor SCEs Acknowledgement of Oral Argument Notice (9th Cir.)(Case No. 20-70899)
ML20204B0782020-07-22022 July 2020
Donna Gilmore Email Holtec Umax Materials (07200054, 05000361, 05000362)
ML20198M4522020-07-15015 July 2020
Supplement to Public Watchdogs 2.206 Petition
ML20163A3402020-05-0505 May 2020
Email Transmission - Peaceful Use Commitments State Dept for SONGS Rx Heads and Steam Generators
ML20120A0282020-04-28028 April 2020
4-28-20 Notice of Addition of James Adler as Attorney for NRC (9th Cir.)(Case No. 20-70899)
ML20076A5742020-03-11011 March 2020
Response to A.Mcnally San Onofre Canisters (LTR-20-0003)
ML20062F5762020-02-28028 February 2020
Public Watchdogs 10 CFR 2.206 Petition - NRC E-mail to Petitioner Regarding Petition Screening Results February 28, 2020
ML20063M3092020-02-28028 February 2020
Public Watchdogs 10 CFR 2.206 Petition - Response from Petitioner to NRC E-mail Regarding Petition Screening Results, February 28, 2020
ML20059M2292020-02-25025 February 2020
OEDO-20-00053 2.206 Petition - Flooding Likely to Create Radioactive Geysers at SONGS
ML20049A0802020-02-14014 February 2020
Public Watchdogs 10 CFR 2.206 Petition - E-mail to Petitioner on Immediate Actions Request Determination February 14, 2020
ML20007E5342020-01-0606 January 2020
Oceansiders Initial Assessment & Public Meeting Response E-Mail
ML20006D7012019-12-23023 December 2019
Public Watchdogs 10 CFR 2.206 Petition SONGS - Petitioner Request for Public Meeting and NRC Response - December 23, 2019
ML19354B6762019-12-20020 December 2019
2.206 Petition Initial Assessment Notification E-Mail
ML19325C5902019-11-20020 November 2019
2.206 Petition Status Notification Email
ML19326B2392019-11-18018 November 2019
Public Watchdogs 10 CFR 2.206 Petition SONGS - Screened-in and PRB November 18, 2019
ML19319B6262019-11-0808 November 2019
Oceansiders 2.206 Petition Immediate Action Response E-Mail
ML19326A7122019-10-30030 October 2019
Public Watchdogs 10 CFR 2.206 Petition - SONGS Receipt of Exhibits October 30, 2019
ML19326A9692019-10-25025 October 2019
Public Watchdogs 10 CFR 2.206 Petition - SONGS Immediate Action Determination October 25, 2019
ML19326A3602019-10-23023 October 2019
Public Watchdogs 10 CFR 2.206 Petition - SONGS First E-mail to Petitioner October 23, 2019
ML19284B3232019-10-0808 October 2019
Response LTR-19-0351 Kalene Walker, E-mail Concerns About Critical Safety Problems with Holtec Nuclear Waste Storage System at San Onofre
ML19344C7842019-09-0303 September 2019
Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 09-03-2019 RSCS
ML19344C7212019-08-30030 August 2019
Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 08-30-2019 J Steinmetz
ML19214A1362019-08-0202 August 2019
Riv Pao Response to Mr. Langley Response to Inquiry
ML19217A1862019-08-0202 August 2019
E-Mail from M. Layton/Nrc to K. Walker/Public San Onofre - SONGS Special Inspection - Damaged Canisters
ML19221B4122019-07-30030 July 2019
Southern California Edison Company, Southern California Nuclear Generating Station, E-mail from Charles Langley to Scott Morris, NRC, Redundant Drop Protection Features at SONGS
ML19210D4292019-07-29029 July 2019
E-Mail from M. Layton/Nrc to D. Gilmore/Public Reply to E-Mail Questions
ML19213A1072019-07-29029 July 2019
Reply to Mr. Langley Re. Redundant Drop Protection Feature at SONGS
ML19210D4342019-07-11011 July 2019
Curtiss-Wright SAS - 10 CFR Part 21 Reporting of Defects for Introl Positioner 890265-010
ML19190A0432019-06-28028 June 2019
Discusses Proprietary Information for Curtiss-Wright SAS - 10 CFR Part 21 Reporting of Defects for Introl Positioner 890265-010 - Cw SAS Initial Report No. 10CFR21-48
ML19165A1102019-06-11011 June 2019
SONGS Webinar (6-3-2019) Message - Sarah Akerson
ML19190A0442019-06-0707 June 2019
10 CFR Part 21 Reporting of Defects for Introl Positioner 890265-010 - Cw SAS Initial Report No. 10CFR21-48
ML19158A4432019-06-0404 June 2019
Southern California Edison Company; Scratches on Nuclear Storage Canisters at San Onofre Pose No Problems, NRC Says After Its Own Analysis - Orange County Register
ML19156A1422019-06-0404 June 2019
LTR-19-0218 Donna Gilmore, Sanonofresafety.Org, E-mail Scratches on Nuclear Storage Canisters at San Onofre
2024-01-15
[Table view] |
Text
Joosten, Sandy From: gary@sanclementegreen.org on behalf of San Clemente Green
< gary@sanclementegreen.org >
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2014 10:53 AM To: CHAIRMAN Resource
Subject:
Tell Edison we want PUBUC SAFETY over PROFIT
- 11 Like San Clemente Green
Dear Allison,
Tuesday evening, March 25, from 6:00-9:00 pm is the first meeting of Edison's Community Engagement Panel (CEP) at the San Clemente Community Center, 100 Calle Seville, (MAP).
A press conference is scheduled for 5:00pm and we would love to have you join us if possible. Edison will share their decommission plans with the public and seek our input, (8:00pm for public comments). A link to the live internet feed will be posted here as soon as it becomes available.
Although we all agree that we want the waste removed yesterday if not sooner, there are some complicated issues that call on us to show up and demand that public safety comes before corporate profit. We don't want to create a situation that lets Edison off the hook while the public takes all the risk. Below are our talking points. Please attend to show you are with us on this critical matter. This first meeting is a very significant opportunity to have our concerns expressed.
1
Did you know that we are storing 89 times the amount of radioactive materials than what was released in the Chernobyl accident'?
(Sour<'<': RobN*t ..\h"aroz report, Jon* 2~. 2013)
Curie~ of Cesium 13 7 90,000,000 80,000,000 70,000,000 60,000,000 50,000,000
+0,000,000 30,000,000 20,000,000 10,000,000 0
Message to the CEP from San Clemente Green ...
Edison needs to fill their credibility gap with actions - not words.
A long history of putting profit before safety eventually led to the closure of the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS). Trying to cut corners actually cost Edison a lot more in the long run. They are now under congressional investigation to determine if they knowingly put the public at risk by installing new steam generators that were problematic since the initial design phase. Donna Gilmore of SanOnofreSafety.org reminds us that, "The NRC concluded Edison was at fault in the management of the steam generator design. How can we trust them to manage the waste?" After the radiation leak occurred, Edison pushed hard against public opposition to experimentally restart a defective nuclear reactor without even fixing it first. Now they promise "to complete the safe decommissioning of SONGS as expeditiously and cost efficiently as possible". Are we to believe they are going to act in the public's best interest or does this promise only apply to their shareholders? Their actions will speak much louder than words.
Our first priority: Secure the nuclear waste on site before the next big, inevitable earthquake takes place.
According to the USGS, it is nearly certain that the much anticipated earthquake will exceed design limitations at SONGS and that it will likely take place before nuclear waste can be shipped elsewhere.
2
Known Faults Exceed Design Basis for 7.0 Earthquake 8.4 Million People live in a 50 Mile Radiaus Our biggest concern: A decade ago, San Onofre was allowed to use High Burnup Fuel so that costly refueling could occur less frequently.
High burn up fuel is over twice as radioactive and takes much longer to cool in the spent fuel pools. There is no approved method to safely store high burnup fuel in dry casks for more than 20 years. In less than 10 years some of those dry casks will have reached their approved safe lifespan. If the fuel has deteriorated to the point of becoming too dangerous to transport then it may have to remain on site indefinitely in that unstable condition. For that reason alone, we are requesting the Community Engagement Panel to schedule their first workshop to include independent nuclear experts who can recommend best practices in addressing the unknowns about high burnup fuel.
3
The bulk of nuclear waste at San Onofre is likely to experience damaged fuel containment within 20 years of dry cask storage, svme of which has less than ten year~ to go.
Our list of recommendations:
- Establish better ways to safely store and transport nuclear waste, especially high burnup fuel, to an acceptable remote location as soon as one is available.
- Improve instrumentation capabilities to monitor spent fuel pools and dry cask storage.
- Add one more layer of protection to dry cask storage by "canning" spent fuel assemblies in individual sub-containers, handling all waste as if it will become damaged by excessive heat and radiation over time.
- Reduce the number of spent fuel assemblies from 24 units per cask instead of seeking to increase it to 32 units for the sole purpose of saving money.
- Transfer adequately cooled fuel assemblies to dry cask storage immediately to free up overcrowded conditions in spent fuel pools, making them more secure.
- Reinforce structures that protect all forms of waste and develop unmanned systems to respond to any radiological emergency.
- Provide on-site capabilities to handle a leaking cask should there be a breach in containment.
- Make public announcements before the release of tons of pollutants into the ocean which is currently allowed as part of the decontamination process.
- Invest in emergency preparedness capabilities for our communities that can endure weeks of isolation, not just a few days.
The overarching message from our community to Edison is:
When in doubt, use the precautionary principle.
Always error on the side of public safety over profit.
- Go to SanOnofreSafety.org for other carefully referenced technical resources.
4
Forward this email
. , .-</#" r:~*ustt!<f t*m4tN r:~~n'~
' CamfdntContr.tr:t" This email was sent to chairman@nrc.gov by gary@sanclementegreen.org Update Profile/Email Address Instant removal with SafeUnsubscribe'M Privacy Policy.
San Clemente Green 2837 Penasco 2837 Penasco San Clemente CA 92673 5
