ML13219A004

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance Review: Catawba Units 1 and 2 - Relief Request 13-CN-003, Request for Alternative to the Requirement of IWB-2500 (MF1922/23)
ML13219A004
Person / Time
Site: Catawba  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 08/06/2013
From: Jason Paige
Plant Licensing Branch II
To: Hart R
Duke Energy Corp
References
TAC MF1922, TAC MF1923
Download: ML13219A004 (2)


Text

NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: Paige, Jason Sent: Tuesday, August 06, 2013 2:53 PM To: randy.hart@duke-energy.com; Rudy, Lawrence J (Lawrence.Rudy@duke-energy.com)

Subject:

ACCEPTANCE REVIEW: Catawba Units 1 and 2 - Relief Request 13-CN-003, Request for Alternative to the Requirement of IWB-2500 (MF1922/23)

SUBJECT:

ACCEPTANCE REVIEW: Catawba Units 1 and 2 - Relief Request 13-CN-003, Request for Alternative to the Requirement of IWB-2500, Table IWB-2500-1, Category B-A and Category B-D (MF1922 and MF1923)

By letter dated May 20, 2013, Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC (the licensee) submitted a relief request for Catawba Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this relief request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.

If you have any questions, please contact me.

Jason Paige, Catawba and McGuire Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch II-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Phone: (301) 415-5888 1

Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 792 Mail Envelope Properties (Jason.Paige@nrc.gov20130806145300)

Subject:

ACCEPTANCE REVIEW: Catawba Units 1 and 2 - Relief Request 13-CN-003, Request for Alternative to the Requirement of IWB-2500 (MF1922/23)

Sent Date: 8/6/2013 2:53:08 PM Received Date: 8/6/2013 2:53:00 PM From: Paige, Jason Created By: Jason.Paige@nrc.gov Recipients:

"randy.hart@duke-energy.com" <randy.hart@duke-energy.com>

Tracking Status: None "Rudy, Lawrence J (Lawrence.Rudy@duke-energy.com)" <Lawrence.Rudy@duke-energy.com>

Tracking Status: None Post Office:

Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1965 8/6/2013 2:53:00 PM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:

Recipients Received: