|
---|
Category:E-Mail
MONTHYEARML22348A0322022-11-30030 November 2022 NRR E-mail Capture - Request to Resume Endangered Species Act Section 7 Consultation for Decommissioning of San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3 ML22348A0532022-11-30030 November 2022 NRC to National Marine Fisheries Service (Nmfs), Request to Resume Endangered Species Act Consultation for Decommissioning of San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3 ML22278A0182022-10-0404 October 2022 (SONGS) Unit 2 Reactor Head and Closure of Commitments Related to Peaceful Use of Foreign Technology- Acknowledge Receipt ML22265A2122022-09-22022 September 2022 Request for Additional Information for Exemption Request from 100m 72.106(B) Requirement, Docket Nos 50-206, 50-361, and 50-362 ML22119A2422022-04-29029 April 2022 Riv FOLLOW-UP Response: Question About April 11 San Onofre Event ML22034A9962022-02-0202 February 2022 S. Morris Response to C. Langley-Questions About Moving Snf at San Onfre ML21280A1022021-12-0606 December 2021 NRC to NMFS, Supplement to Request to Reinitiate Endangered Species Act Consultation for San Onofre Decommissioning ML21277A2342021-09-30030 September 2021 NMFS to NRC, Receipt of Request to Reinitiate Endangered Species Act Consultation for San Onofre Decommissioning ML21242A0602021-09-30030 September 2021 NRC to NMFS, Request to Initiate Consultation for SONGS Decommissioning ML21117A3492021-03-30030 March 2021 March 30, 2021, Email from Public Watchdogs on Providing New Information to Its October 13, 2020, 2.206 Petition ML21069A2482021-03-10010 March 2021 Umax, 07200054, 05000361, 05000362, FSAR Revision 4 for San Onofre ISFSI ML21068A2712021-03-0909 March 2021 Request for Additional Information Regarding Biological Opinion - SONGS- EPID L-2021-LLL-0006 ML20343A1292020-12-0808 December 2020 NRR E-mail Capture - Request for Additional Information ML20302A3252020-10-21021 October 2020 E-Mail: Acknowledgement of Receipt to the Petitioner Regarding SCE Use of Hi-Storm at SONGS ML20233A7342020-08-18018 August 2020 LTR-20-0313 David Victor, San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS) Community Engagement Panel, Chair, Et Al., Letter Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Security at SONGS and Recent SONGS Community Engagement Panel Meeting on O ML20224A0172020-08-0707 August 2020 8-7-20 Corrected Hearing Time - Intervenor SCEs Acknowledgement of Oral Argument Notice (9th Cir.)(Case No. 20-70899) ML20224A0182020-08-0707 August 2020 8-7-20 Intervenor SCEs Acknowledgement of Oral Argument Notice (9th Cir.)(Case No. 20-70899) ML20204B0782020-07-22022 July 2020 Donna Gilmore Email Holtec Umax Materials (07200054, 05000361, 05000362) ML20198M4522020-07-15015 July 2020 Supplement to Public Watchdogs 2.206 Petition ML20163A3402020-05-0505 May 2020 Email Transmission - Peaceful Use Commitments State Dept for SONGS Rx Heads and Steam Generators ML20120A0282020-04-28028 April 2020 4-28-20 Notice of Addition of James Adler as Attorney for NRC (9th Cir.)(Case No. 20-70899) ML20076A5742020-03-11011 March 2020 Response to A.Mcnally San Onofre Canisters (LTR-20-0003) ML20062F5762020-02-28028 February 2020 Public Watchdogs 10 CFR 2.206 Petition - NRC E-mail to Petitioner Regarding Petition Screening Results February 28, 2020 ML20063M3092020-02-28028 February 2020 Public Watchdogs 10 CFR 2.206 Petition - Response from Petitioner to NRC E-mail Regarding Petition Screening Results, February 28, 2020 ML20059M2292020-02-25025 February 2020 OEDO-20-00053 2.206 Petition - Flooding Likely to Create Radioactive Geysers at SONGS ML20049A0802020-02-14014 February 2020 Public Watchdogs 10 CFR 2.206 Petition - E-mail to Petitioner on Immediate Actions Request Determination February 14, 2020 ML20007E5342020-01-0606 January 2020 Oceansiders Initial Assessment & Public Meeting Response E-Mail ML20006D7012019-12-23023 December 2019 Public Watchdogs 10 CFR 2.206 Petition SONGS - Petitioner Request for Public Meeting and NRC Response - December 23, 2019 ML19354B6762019-12-20020 December 2019 2.206 Petition Initial Assessment Notification E-Mail ML19325C5902019-11-20020 November 2019 2.206 Petition Status Notification Email ML19326B2392019-11-18018 November 2019 Public Watchdogs 10 CFR 2.206 Petition SONGS - Screened-in and PRB November 18, 2019 ML19319B6262019-11-0808 November 2019 Oceansiders 2.206 Petition Immediate Action Response E-Mail ML19326A7122019-10-30030 October 2019 Public Watchdogs 10 CFR 2.206 Petition - SONGS Receipt of Exhibits October 30, 2019 ML19326A9692019-10-25025 October 2019 Public Watchdogs 10 CFR 2.206 Petition - SONGS Immediate Action Determination October 25, 2019 ML19326A3602019-10-23023 October 2019 Public Watchdogs 10 CFR 2.206 Petition - SONGS First E-mail to Petitioner October 23, 2019 ML19284B3232019-10-0808 October 2019 Response LTR-19-0351 Kalene Walker, E-mail Concerns About Critical Safety Problems with Holtec Nuclear Waste Storage System at San Onofre ML19344C7842019-09-0303 September 2019 Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 09-03-2019 RSCS ML19344C7212019-08-30030 August 2019 Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 08-30-2019 J Steinmetz ML19217A1862019-08-0202 August 2019 E-Mail from M. Layton/Nrc to K. Walker/Public San Onofre - SONGS Special Inspection - Damaged Canisters ML19214A1362019-08-0202 August 2019 Riv Pao Response to Mr. Langley Response to Inquiry ML19221B4122019-07-30030 July 2019 Southern California Edison Company, Southern California Nuclear Generating Station, E-mail from Charles Langley to Scott Morris, NRC, Redundant Drop Protection Features at SONGS ML19213A1072019-07-29029 July 2019 Reply to Mr. Langley Re. Redundant Drop Protection Feature at SONGS ML19210D4292019-07-29029 July 2019 E-Mail from M. Layton/Nrc to D. Gilmore/Public Reply to E-Mail Questions ML19210D4342019-07-11011 July 2019 Curtiss-Wright SAS - 10 CFR Part 21 Reporting of Defects for Introl Positioner 890265-010 ML19190A0432019-06-28028 June 2019 Discusses Proprietary Information for Curtiss-Wright SAS - 10 CFR Part 21 Reporting of Defects for Introl Positioner 890265-010 - Cw SAS Initial Report No. 10CFR21-48 ML19165A1102019-06-11011 June 2019 SONGS Webinar (6-3-2019) Message - Sarah Akerson ML19190A0442019-06-0707 June 2019 10 CFR Part 21 Reporting of Defects for Introl Positioner 890265-010 - Cw SAS Initial Report No. 10CFR21-48 ML19158A4432019-06-0404 June 2019 Southern California Edison Company; Scratches on Nuclear Storage Canisters at San Onofre Pose No Problems, NRC Says After Its Own Analysis - Orange County Register ML19156A1422019-06-0404 June 2019 LTR-19-0218 Donna Gilmore, Sanonofresafety.Org, E-mail Scratches on Nuclear Storage Canisters at San Onofre ML19158A1312019-05-31031 May 2019 Paragon Energy Systems LLC -10 CFR Part 21 Report of Defect GS2 Terry Turbine Introl Positioners 2022-09-22
[Table view] |
Text
OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY CORRESPONDENCE CONTROL TICKET Date Printed: Jan 23, 2013 15:30 PAPER NUMBER: LTR-13-0060 LOGGING DATE: 01/22/2013 ACTION OFFICE:
CeDO Pi..V AUTHOR: Ace Hoffman AFFILIATION:
ADDRESSEE: Chairman Resource
SUBJECT:
Information on the Nuclear Power Debate ACTION: Appropriate DISTRIBUTION: RF, SECY has Ack LETTER DATE: 01/20/2013 ACKNOWLEDGED Yes SPECIAL HANDLING: Lead office to publicly release 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> after SECY's assignment, via SECY/EDO/DPC.
NOTES:
FILE LOCATION: ADAMS DATE DUE: DATE SIGNED:
Joosten, Sandy From: Ace Hoffman [rhoffman@animatedsoftware.com]
Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2013 6:36 PM
Subject:
NUCLEAR POWER DEBATE TONIGHT! Harvey Wasserman vs. Dr. Ben Wattenburg 1/20/2013
Dear Readers,
San Onofre (SanO) remains shut down as the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) awaits Southern California Edison's (SCE's) response to 32 areas of concern, which were sent to SCE's Chief Nuclear Officer (CNO) Pete Dietrich by the NRC on December 26, 2012.
Meanwhile, the California Public Utilities Commission's (CPUC's) "Order Instituting Investigation" (011) is getting under way. Some useful URLs regarding the 011 appear below.
Sincerely, Ace Hoffman Carlsbad, CA Topics:
(1) NUCLEAR POWER DEBATE TONIGHT!
(2) Will San Onofre be restarted soon? Quite possibly...
(3) CPUC 011 URLs (4) This movement is a positive one...
(1) NUCLEAR POWER DEBATE TONIGHT!
Sunday, January 20th, 2013 Harvey Wasserman vs. Dr. Ben Wattenburg.
11:15pm eastern/8:15 pacific.
Streaming live at http://www.trnl.com/wattenburg-audio NO NUKES/4 SOLARTOPIA!!!
(2) Will San Onofre be restarted soon? Quite possibly...
This is from a letter to Harvey Wasserman .....
The claim of a possible restart, as I recall, came from several sources. One I heard was that workers were being called in for that period of time, workers who would be most likely involved in a restart. Sorry, I'm working from memory and can't cite the source. Another story is that the NRC's meeting schedules and statements sound like they just need to get some documentation from SCE, look at it, and then viola! They approve the reactor and it starts running within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />. I believe the LATimes said something about the NRC saying they are only one step away from allowing restart (not in so many words, perhaps).
And lastly and most importantly, somewhere along the line, SCE is directly credited with proposing a March 5th restart, or mid-March, or some time in March ....
I
So although I don't know which of these statements I could verify for you or give you any source, those are what I've been hearing. In my opinion, the ONLY thing preventing a restart is that the NRC isn't totally blind, and San Onofre's U-tubes really are busted. It would be nice to think it's a simple as that, but it isn't. We desperately need the governor to weigh in against the plant, nothing would be better for California and, I think, for other governors who also want to dump their nukes.
Another very real possibility is that Edison will sit on a shut SanO for the 3-5 years it will take to re-engineer and build new Steam Generators. They won't mind a bit, since the ratepayers will pay for it. We've got to dismantle the beast. Otherwise, it can and will be restarted. Edison would be willing to eat the whole costs if they could have their reactors back afterwards, they just don't expect to have to do that, but they would. A properly running reactor is very, very lucrative for its owners and guaranteed to be that way for two decades at a time. They can lose a few billion waiting for that cash cow to start giving again.
Ace Hoffman Carlsbad, CA (3) CPUC 011 URLs:
SCE has posted documents online here:
http://www3.sce.com/sscc/law/dis/SongsOlIDocLibrary.nsf/viewByCategory.xsp San Diego Gas & Electric has posted "public" versions of documents here:
http://www.sdge.com/regulatory-filing/4011/songs-investigation Here is the official CPUC web site for the 011 proceeding -- it has rulings and decisions, party comments and motions (but no testimony or transcripts -- for testimony you have to be on the service list, and for transcripts you have to pay a fee or be a party eligible for compensation):
http://delapsl.cpuc.ca.gov/CPUCProceedingLookup/f?p=401:56:1260337137439001::NO:RP,57,RIR:P5_
PROCEEDINGSELECT:I1210013 (4) This movement is a positive one of enlightenment, enrichment, growth, and love of all things living...
1/2e/2013
Dear All,
This movement is FOR decommissioning San Onofre NOW. It is FOR a clean environment. It is FOR protecting our DNA from damage. It is FOR protecting ALL creature's DNA. It is PRO-LIFE (but that term's been taken).
It's not ANTI-anything, unless it's anti-death, anti-illness, anti-pain, anti-global poverty, anti-damage to our DNA.
This movement has achieved many positive things, especially since Fukushima, and since the steam generator tube leaked and the reactors were shut down: Increasing awareness in the community and among its local elected officials of the dangers of SanO, obtaining letters of concern from numerous cities, informing the NRC that we are far from comfortable with a 2
retart, informing the CPUC that their responsibility lies with the people, not with the corporations. Informing the media. Informing each other.
This movement is a positive one of enlightenment, enrichment, growth, and love.
Turn off the nukes, turn on the sun! Think positive, and (with all due respect...) do not become one of the "nattering nabobs of negativism." :-}
Ace Hoffman Carlsbad, CA Contact information for the author of this newsletter:
Ace Hoffman, computer programmer, author, The Code Killers:
An Expose of the Nuclear Industry Free download: acehoffman.org Blog: acehoffman.blogspot.com YouTube: youtube.com/user/AceHoffman Phone: (760) 720-7261 Address: PO Box 1936, Carlsbad, CA 92018 Subscribe to my free newsletter today!
Email: ace [at] acehoffman.org To unsubscribe:
Send "Unsubscribe" in subject line.
3