NL-12-2270, SNCV061-RPT-01, Ver 1.0, Vogtle Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic. Part 2 of 20

From kanterella
(Redirected from ML13003A241)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
SNCV061-RPT-01, Ver 1.0, Vogtle Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic. Part 2 of 20
ML13003A241
Person / Time
Site: Vogtle Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 11/26/2012
From: Volodarsky D
Southern Nuclear Operating Co
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NL-12-2270 SNCV061-RPT-01, Ver 1.0
Download: ML13003A241 (43)
v • d • e


Text

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1. of 2: Status:'9 N' U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment, iDNo.

Equip. Class' Z-- (& Ic,: .4 */ .... __Equipment Description itvltz g i(,4T [h1d&f L .1ocatiot:

Bldg a. AU-'.. Floor EL. i 3 L g Room, Area L.. C .i Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optiopial but recoffinided)

Instructions for Completing Checklist'This checklist may beused to document the results of the, Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipmpent theýSWEL. The space below each. of the following questions may beused to.record the results ofjudgcnts and, indings. Additional space is provided at the end of thiischecklist f6rdocumenting oiher comnmnents.

Anchorage 1. lIs the anchorage configuration verification required (iLe.,:is theifem~one YW NO-l-of th&e.5%6 of SgWL items requiring such Veri Ifcation)?

2. Is the anchorageefree of bent, brokený missing or loose iiaTdwareT
3. Is, the anchorage free of corrosion.

that is more than mild surface oxidation?, 4.. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near-the anchorsi.5, Is the anchorage configuration consistefit~with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applics. if the item is one of the 50% for which an d Vdrifiation is required.)

ýca... ion is

6. Based on tha 'above.:chaorage paiuatioinbs, is the anclhorage free of potentially adverse seismic~conditions?

Y [J Ul] N/AL]j Yr NO, UEI N/Al]YQ-NO, Ul] N/AL YVEJ, Ul]N/l 1'2 Entcr the equipmenticlass name, frorm Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

4' C-3 .>, PAGE 33 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet.2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Chedklist (SWC)EqUipment ID No. 1 2 FEuip. Class 12 Equipment Description .4rAi , C/:(-AJ 1..Interaction EffectsAresoft targets free fromimpact.by nearby equipment:or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, dishribufion systems, ceiling tiiesand fighting, and masonry block Walls not likcldy to collapse onto the equipmient?, 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?I 10.. Based on the above seismic interaction:evaluations, is.-equipment free, of potentially a'dverse seismic interaction'effects?

YG..ND U[ N/AD1 Y.ND UE N/AD Y NE UD N/AD Y "NE UD Other Adiverse C6nditions t I. Have yo lobked for afnd found n: other seismic conditions thiat'could YR.ND UD adversely affect thesafety functions of the equipiment.?

Comments (Additiohai paoes b'ay b added as necessary)

Eval'uated by: ,/4);Ai4~ 5i~apK ltn 6so Date- i" ~< C-4 >PAGE 34 of 668 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION .0P 17 2012 PAGE 35 of 668 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSIONOO PAGE 36 of 668 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION .0 PAGE 37 of 668 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSIOP PAGE 38 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 SMeet 1 of 2 Status:QON u Seismic Walkdown.

Clheckfist (S WC)Equip ent ID No , .7. Equtip. Cdass'VTG (v iG.4 ý Rlp-Equipment Description R"R~Locatibn:

Bldg. ý Floor Et. t Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Ete, (optional but recommended) t C'R. oLL,- )InstructiOns for Completing CheckLst This schicklist may be used to documentt the results of the Seismic' Walkdowii of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the-results of judgments and ,findings.=

Additional spalce is,'provided at the end offhtis checklist for documentingiotier coinientS, Anchorage I. Is configuration verification required (i.(e, is, thieitem onae Y NO of thc'50% of items-re Wuiring such verification)?

2. 1I0ssbeýnchoragefree oftbent, broken, missing or Those hardware?3I is the-anchorage freeof corrosion that.is more than mild.strface oxidation?

YN NO. V N!AO V~x NO UQC N/AO 4., is the anchorage free of visible'cracks int the concr6te near thean'hdors?P Y% NO7 U11 N,/AO: 5' IS the manch6ragye configuration consistent With plan! documeniation?<(Note: This questiaon only applies if the item is one of the 5'0/ for which ananchdrage configuraion verification isgrequired.)ý 6, Based on theabove anchorage evalmtiobns;"is theanchorage frecof potentially adverse seismic conditions?

ý%NO, 'U N/AO T-P re)SNO VO 1 2 ,13nier the equipnient class naq'ný fforh~ppendix 13:. Classes 0f 'q~iiP1Vnot.

PAGE 39 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet,2 of.2 tSeismic Walkdown lCbecklist

((SWC), Equipment iD No. t- i&J'6 .'. ' Equip.'Class'l C ( ~C4 /x Equipment Description I I I P Lk,44,11 /?,'14-K Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets. free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?:

8. Axe overhead equipment, distribution sysiems, ceiling tiles and lighting,'and masonry block-walls not likely to c6iapse onto, the eqU1iiipment..
9. Do attached lines have adequateflexibility to av0idd~nage?

YCNCI U0I ýN/A Yl. ýNCD tUJCE ýN/ACI YON NCUC'1,0. Based ontfie aboveseismic interactionmevaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects ?Other Adve-sý'C'onditions

1. Have you ooJked forýand foundlo othbdr seisnii.cofiditioris that could adversely affect the safaty fuficti6ns of:the equipmenf?

Y9 .NC ur If~ ~ *~ i.>at<9#~/

h~ -~{9~ fk.A ~ viZ; 1/4',&~ A.A+&-o,.Comments (Additional pages may be adidedas necessaty)

Evaluatd.by:.

ýj gjýý' ýDate: ' .,< C4> >PAGE 40 of 668 9ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSIONS 08 17 2012 PAGE 41 of 668 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSIOONO PAGE 42 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet I of 2 Status:. N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentlD No. L1l206t-Ph-662 Equip.Class 1 2 if (Ht-zrcdTn Equipment Description COt-ra erin4rJ n F3_B Location:

Bldg. Atx-X Floor El. 1 Room, Area .7 .Manufacturer, Model. Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used'to document the results of the ISeismic Walkdown of an item of equipmenrt, on the SWEL. The'space below each of the following;questionsmay be used to record theresults ofjudgments and findings; Additional space is provided.at the end of thislchecklist for documenting other comments.Anchiorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the itern one of the :50% of SWEL items requiring such.verification)?

YJNEI 2. Is, the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceýoxidation?

4.. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete ntear the atchors?5. Isthe anchorage configurationl c6nsistent with plantdocumeiitat'ioni?(Note: This question onlyapplies if theitem is one of the 50%.for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

IX(UA0O ..OQOI. Ver /0.O, 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free-of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yof NO UOC N/AD YI(NO UC N/AO-YW.NO UQ N/AU YXNO UC. N/AC.Y41N" UOJ 11 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< PAGE 43 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV06 I-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet2 of 2 Seismic: Waikdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentlDNo.

f:12W- EquipClass=n " (fOIr n'A, Put.fur p)EquipmentDescription 5,prOaq R 'mp p InteraCtion EffeCts 7 soft targets.free from impact by.nearby equipment or structures?

Yk(Nl UQ N/AO 8. Are 6verh~ad equdipmenlt,.distri~hution systemns, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry. block walls not likely. to collapse onto the equipmentf?

.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?.10. Basedon the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y'NO Ur- N/A.J U[ N/AQ Yý(NO Url Other Adverse Conditions I, Have you lookedfor and found no other seismic conditions that could Iy NO UEJ1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?'

Comments (Additional pages maybe added as necessary)

S, "54- a:ir .w i.... .a- t -.obv- eqP( "'h roi "-7 f7. nýaR" al c, : t.?It O / J kori4 ConCeM5 ex I , 0A. '4 AAh;5 Date Evaluated by: -VOL ~tO~SA/V/4'~2Ql2.

3 /.~ Zo/2-<C-U >PAGE 44 of 668 "ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION PAGE 45 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 SheetI of2 Status: /)N Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

No./'/' P 6-P 0103' Equip. Class,1 2 2 -_ _ _ _ __. .... ..... ..Equpment Description egLi7.flA*ý dý,,-/, ' 5 dA7ý A-w rw Location:

Bldg, FlooroE1, _____.__ Room, Area ,9e: /,~Manufacturer, Modelý, Etc. (optiona rbut recomnmetnded)

.4t/F-. AJP P1 taS WJ,1 4'6%%, /A'tI$7 Instructions for Coipleting Checklist Thisýýchecklist may be used to dqcpýmit the result§ ofliheSeismic'Walkdown of an item of ecquiPment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results.pfjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided.

at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments:.

Anchorage'I. is the anchorage configuratiori veilficdtion required (i.e., is the item one YE! N.of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is, the anfidhorage fred of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3.. Is the anchorage corrosion.

that is more than mild surfice oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage ftee of visible criacks in the concrete near the anchors'?,5. Is theanchorage configuration consistefit with plahit dodumentation?(Note: This questioin only applies if the.item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification.is requifed.)
6. Basdd On the above anchorageevaluations, is the anchorage free of potenfially adverse seisrnic6onditions?

ýxNM 'UE1 N/AEJ NEI UE1 N/AEO'NEI] I.N/AO'YO, NEI UEO N//AM YNEI UF1the equipiiient class name:from Appendix B: ClasesmofEqiippment.

C- 3 PAGE 46 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 S.heet 2 of 2 Seismic. Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

ID No. fr iY/z2-- 03O Equip. Class4 2 Equipment.Description 6ýVe$ 44~ev 4&-~,1R47~if AUAV' 7-AWAI B interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

NO U[:N/A[3 8. Are overhead equipm.eqnt, distribution sysiems, ceiling tiles and lighting, UN ] .NAFI and masomny Ilsnot likely to collapse onto the equipment" 9. Do~attached mines ,have adequate flexibility-to avoid damage?10; Based on the above seismic interaction evaiiatiohi, isequipment free of potentia l' adverse, seismic intei'action effects?.NO UCI N/AC YR NE UEJE.Other Adverse Conditions IL HAve:yo~u looked for and found no other seismic Conditions thatccould

NEI Un adversely affect the safety fluctions sbf thd equipment?.

Commentsý 6Additional pages.riay beadded as'necessary)

No ~Evaluated by.: Z4" .4.. 4' Da te': __ _ _2_-_PAGE 47 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 48 of 668

  • TACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION .00 PAGE 49 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Stanis: N, U Seismic WalkdownChecklist (SWC)Equipment IDNo -N -t Equip. Class'2 0 khe r): Equipment Description
  • OADj CC.P Dikharac 1-, on c Rt :, L"ocation 13dg. _Auix Floor El. 4ik;; Room, Area .i..,Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Wes+ t A -.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may. be. used to document the results ofthe Seismic Walkdoown of an item of-equipment on the SWEL. The space below eah of the following questions.may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional'space is provided at: the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchora~e 1. Is the-anchorage configuratioti verification-required (i..js the item one Yo NW of the 50%.of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent,.broken, missing or loose hardware?

Yý NO UO N/AQ 3 Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YX NO U0 N/AC oxidation?

  • 4. Nstdie anchorage fr6e of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YK No UPC N/AC 4r c C tnS C1114(5- .T ijfar4- .0 w 5. Is the anchorage configurationmcopsistent with lant documentation?

YO NO UE NIA (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for -.which an anchorage configuration verification'is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YK'Nn UJ potentially adverse seismic conditions?

1 Enter tlie equipment classfnamie from Appendix B: Classes of Equipnent..C-3)PAGE 50 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Chek~list (SWC)Equipm-nt ID No..I-IO 1:3 Eq4uip. Class'U.(0kr Equipment Description MCa~ PD chVV.u~hPos' th interaction Effects.7. Are soft targets. ree from impact by nearby equipment or:stuctures?

8. Are overhead cquipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and .lighting, and masoiny block Walls not likely to collapse onto0the equipmieIat?

9.. Do attached lines.ha e adequate flexibility to avbiddamage?

10. Based on the ab6veseismicdinteraction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y4,ND UID N/AD ,ND NID N/AD Y/ND 0ID N/AD Yý NOTIUQ Other Adverse Conditions 11..Have you looked for and found no other seismic.conditions that could Y 'NO UJ adversely affect'the.safety functionsof the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added .a:necessary), 40oQ~dlt~

COf~Evaluated by: /id{'Ld~I f)at~e: 69 120/2-<C-4>PAGE 51 of 668 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSIOONO PAGE 52 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 53 of 668 97ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSIONPO PAGE 54 of 668 9 TACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION .0P PAGE 55 of 668

  • ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 56 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of2 StarusG N U seismic Walkdown Checklist (SW.C).Equi'pmen+B:D No: tf-/~-,/./ Equip.. Class 1 2 Equipment Descripti'on 4C_.I. _ _./I '- d.A Bldg. Floor El. V Li ReootModel, Etc. :(optional but a, Area _______________

?ins'truet~iois for Completing Checklislt Thischecklislt may be used to, document the results of the S,.esmic Walkdown .of an item of equ~ipment, on thle:SWEL. The space below each of the questions may be used to record t~he results of'jtdgmnents and*findings.

Additionarispace is providted at the end of th.is ch~ecklist:

for documenfting othier~comments.

Anehoralle

1. Is the anchorage reqtii'ed.(i~e., the item one of the 50% of tSWEL items requiring .such verificatiori)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bentbroken, missing or loose~hatdware?;
13. !Is. the anchorage free =of corrosionthatisismrdtehan mild surface.:oxidation?~

.4. is the ancl~i~igi~e free:.of visible cracks in thc:.o,6ncr!etenear the anchcirs?'

.5>: LI the anchorage conffiguration .c6ijgi~st~nt Svith plant do~cumdnta.tion?

.(Noice This qiiestion only, app~lies~if~the itoni isohe of thae 50% for anic ana!chorage n isrcqiiired.)

6". =Based ewahnations, is fr~eeof,: potentially ad~'.ese Seis afic conditions?

YEX/NL~ %;j~2y'- i,2~NEJ IJEJ N/AfJ N12 UE3 N/AE Y~ NEj Ufl N/ALl Y~NC UEJ N/ALl Y , .. .... .k~ f~ rth~ q~pn~cnt da~s namefrom App~ndix t3: (IAIics ot (Cr3..>PAGE 57 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of.2 Seis.micc Walkdown Checklist (SWC), Equipment

[D:No,; 1/ '1'? e4-" ý Equip. Cla$ss EquipmentDescription A-CtJJ /40i-* .21 Injteraction E~ffct 7. Are soft, targets free from impact by niearby equiPnient or structures?

Y u NCE JO N/ACr 8.Are oyerheadequipment, distribution systems, ceilinig tiles and lighting, NC UC N/AI and)mfiasonry block wals not: likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9, Doatttched .lines have adeqiiate, fl~xibility t6., vdid daiiiage?10, Based on the above seiinic interaction ealuation&s' equtipment free.of potentially adverse 'seismic interaction effects?V&NC u(O .N/AC YfNCO UC OtherýAdveirse Conditions 1H. H-ave'ydti looked for and found no.o6therseismic conditions-thatcould Y..$ NC U[I adversely:affeci thiesafety functions of"ihe equipment?

Comm enis (Additional pages may be addas n eiessary)............

Evaluated by:) ~K'~4 ... Date: .2<"C-4 >PAGE 58 of 668 07ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERS1000 e PAGE 59 of 668 I ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION*O 08 202012 PAGE 60 of 668

  • ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSIONPO PAGE 61 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet i uf 2 Status." N \1I Seismic WaIkdohn .Cheklist: (SWc)'Equipment IDIý1 LNo,13-622t

_ý -,I- Equi1p. C-117s'2 Loeeatuin:¢ Ff6toril. K:oomi,,A~rea.

io,/Manufacturer, ModcljýEtc. (optýýibnalb t recommended).

lac~~Instructions for Completing Checclist This checklist may i be used to docum ent te:resulits of the Seismic Walkdown:

f anc it,1iofeti Opmentri te SWEL. Thie i spatc pejoes' ch of t ieufoloii que'stio Rsemk y be iurdomenrd theresults of0judgormts and findinigs.

Additio Ia] spalec i. provided ;t the end )f ti hcls b ouetn te.tomns A'nchoraage

1. i itheanichorage configuratiofnerificati no qurdeiid is the itemi one of the 5.0% of SWEL itemsnc;rquirihig.

suchveification)?

ý 8,ý,, 13-Is ,the anchoracge free of betc, broken, nmissint or loose hardware?3. Is :the anchiorage cifiiree i~nfcofrosion steat wiis mrelhaniiiidsiumet'adebi 4.k the anchorage frec 6:1 coiiberamn ho re n 4 thencho efiýc e vis,,ý..................erccý narfth-canhors?

S. I, thenchrg contdoi~tnin i(Note: Th1is q0esti6o.1,lyv ppplies if the Wine is ofibe of the 50for which an configri-ion-verificationis required.)

,6z uo on ebov horab g-vaiuati:olsis t canchore ek potenJtialyadi,,ewr Clsasilnk o~to I71N IUO N/,TA(C YOI NO IjQ- N/AC YO.4 C U11 N/'AC y? NEI 130n N/AC/g E'U1'2 Ete te qupmntclss ioan wn Apo 6nai~x : Cuism,ý ofji 61t-PAGE 62 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipmcnt lDbNo, /-/ý. .I Equip ....quimcnt.Descrp , tionT .Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from'impact by nearby equipiiment orstructures?

8. Are overhead.eiquipment, distributiofi systems, ceilinig tile"sand ighting, arid:masonry block walls not likely to collapse ontoithe equipment?
9. Do attachedlines have adeqte flexibility to av6id damage?1.0. Bosed O(n the ab oVe seismic ihteraction e.valuations, is equipmente free o6f pbtentially ad#scjsn Sisic iiiter~action ieffects?'

YIjf'N[ UEJ NIAIIJ Yfg'NE] UO1 ýN/AD]YZE1 NE UF11 NIAfl1'Y Nelrc Ut Other, Adverse Conditions

11. Have-you looked for and fdund no other seismic conditions that could e EU]adcierscly affbct .the safety functions of the equipment?

Commient (Additi.ona'lt ages nmay be added aý necessiry)

Evaluated by: ,A Date : V ,< C-4 _PAGE 63 of 668 97ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSIOVO PAGE 64 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet.1 of02Y N U Seismic WaPkdown:

Checklist (SWC)EquipmentIIlNoý J-1*302I-~/60--03 Equip Class1 2 Equipment Description J.; Y7&J r ,.Location:.

Bldg*,# Floor El. 1, -k6 Room, Area,....., Manufacturer, Model! Etc. (optional but recormmended)

................

Instrudions for CoompletingChecklist This checklist may be usedito document the results of the'Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anehor.ae

/I. Is the anchorageconfiguration verification required(i~ej, is the item one Y of the 50% of SWEL items're uiring such verification)?, 21 is, the anchorage free of bent, broken missing or loose hardware?3. is the anchorage, free of corrosionb thatis more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the:anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete nearthe anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one-ofthe 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

T ,O ) / "+0 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage freeof potentially adverse seismic conditions?, Y8: NO U- N/A'YO NO UQ N/AD Y(FNO TUO NAD yd I'No U0./A 12 Enter th-e quipment class name from AppentixB:

Ciasse of Equipment.

.< C-3 ,'PAGE 65 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 SeIsmic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentID No. 1/, '-4 Ca 2 &--Equipment Description F, F] P'.o A",- I) Enteraction Effects 7. Are soft targets freefroin impact by nearby equipmont or structures?

8. Are ovedicad equipment, disibuton systems,;ceiling tiles and lightng, and masonry block walls not likaly t6 eollapse ontt he equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid'damage?

y[q'ND UQI N/AID Y1fl'NQ UO: N/AO, Y160UE N/AU).106 Based on the seismic in evaluations, is equipment free B INQ :U 6f potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions

11. Haveý you looke for and found no other eismic conditins that could Y(Y'NO" UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipmenat?

C! .nts ..(Additional pages maybe added as necessary)

Evaluated by: 0'Cf~~-/ ,-.. ~P$~irJk]/ P. ,0 Date:<(U:>PAGE 66 of 668 f ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSIOONO PAGE 67 of 668 JACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 MDAFW I'M?-,~PAGE 68 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of2 Statiu.s N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist

.(SWC)Equipm'ent ID No4 '/~~z Equip., Clas-.s'___

Etquipment Description a, Ls alov. ... /.- L Z'S&T 9 Location:

Bldg..&T %/J ( FIoor El.. Room, Area UAUT I Manufhc¢trer, Model, Etc. (optional but-reconumended).Instructions

for Completing Checklist This checklist .mpy be used .to the results of the Seismt.ic Waikdownotf an item of equipment on the SW.EL. The spaCebelow, each of the following quest ionstnay betised'to.record the results and findings.

Additional space is providfd a the d nd of this check'list for documhentingother omments,....j1 ..... a.. ..e6 ) , .m Anchorage!. Is tai'ch Trageconfiguration vetification:reqlired (i.e2, is the iteri bne&of the 50% of SWEL items~reqiiding suclci verification-)?

2., I the ancho brokefi, missing or loose hardware?ý YeNEJ UEJ N/ALIJ 3. Is theanchorage free of corrosion that is miote than mild surthice oxidation?

YF~'NFJ UEJ N/AO S. C4;~-I4 is the anchorage-free of visi-blcracks in= th'ie eiindrmte near~the ancholrs?5. Is the anihorage configuration consistent.

wiih.plint documentation?(Note; This question oply applies-if the itemnis oneno.the50%

for which ad anc'liorage configuration:

verification is requifled!)

6. Based.oin the above anchorage cvalutatiois, is the iicLiofiage ffreuof-potentially adverse seisnie conditions?

'Y.D'ýNO 'UEIJ N/AEJ 8NE] UE] N/Au /4 Yie/NEI UEJ tio hce quiprncnt.class~namne from Appciith.ý 13: Cli~s4, of Equlpqwml<C-3,>PAGE 69 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walldown Checidist (SWC)Equipment lD No. .-i 02 <4 o/ Equip. Class z ti Equipment.

Description G bS,,f '&.a-v e 7"*-LI. Uc .Interaction ETecet!71. Are sofl targets, frce from impact byinearby equipmcntrstmutures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems,.

celli tiles and lighting, and masonry bIock"Nvills ilot likely. to collapse.

bnithe equipment?

9. Do attached'lines, have adequate Ocxibility toavoidi"amage?
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is e quipm(ent, free ofpotentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yt/IOI Uf- N/AC1 Y2('NO UID N/AC YtiINC CID N/ACI iveNO U0D Other Adverse Conditions
11. Havelyou Iooked for and [ound.no othcr seismic condiitions that could. Y~f-N UQ].adversely affect the safety fun.tibs~otht e i, p ficnt?Coinments (Additionali pages hiay be added..as necessary)
  • ke c-t .P COicf,ý' '4'.. sfra I 7 .a4, J * ....Ch4~ 1~ A [ 4. rvV(~PAR ~Im Wp rJR ym Dala e.J- 2~< C4 >PAGE 70 of 668
  • .ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0O NO. SNCV061-RPT-O1, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 71 of 668 O ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSIONOO PAGE 72 of 668 9 TACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 73 of 668
  • TACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION .0 PAGE 74 of 668 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERS1000 PAGE 75 of 668
Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=NL-12-2270,_SNCV061-RPT-01,_Ver_1.0,_Vogtle_Unit_1_Seismic_Walkdown_Report_for_Resolution_of_Fukushima_Near-Term_Task_Force_Recommendation_2.3:_Seismic._Part_2_of_20&oldid=908277"