ML12353A231

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
12Q0108.50-R-001, Rev. 1, Seismic Walkdown Report in Response to the 50.54(f) Information Request Regarding Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic for the LaSalle County Station, Unit 1, Part 7 of 15
ML12353A231
Person / Time
Site: LaSalle Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 11/01/2012
From: Delaney M
Stevenson & Associates
To:
Exelon Generation Co, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
RS-12-163 12Q0108.50-R-001, Rev 1
Download: ML12353A231 (66)
v • d • e


Text

12Q0108.50-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1E12-N027B Equipment Class: (19) Temperature Sensors Equipment

==

Description:==

B RHR HX OUTLET TEMPERATURE ELEMENT Project: LaSalle 1 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 694.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findincs.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documentina other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-314 12Q0108.50-R-O01 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: FYI N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1E12-N027B Equipment Class: (19) Temperature Sensors Equipment

==

Description:==

B RHR HX OUTLET TEMPERATURE ELEMENT Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Overhead light fixtures judged to be acceptable.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Seismic Walkdown Team: J. Griffith & M. Wodarcyk -9/12/2012 Evaluated by: James Griffith Date: 10/17/2012 Michael Wodarcyk 10/17/2012 C-315 12Q0108.50-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: Y-] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Eauioment DescriDtion:

1 E12-N027B (19) Temperature Sensors B RHR HX OUTLET TEMPERATURE ELEMENT Photos C-316 12Q0108.50-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 1 of 5 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1E21-COO1 Equipment Class: (6) Vertical Pumps Equipment

==

Description:==

LPCS PUMP Project: LaSalle 1 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 673.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Yes Minor lack of thread engagement judged to be acceptable.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes Minor shrinkage cracks in pedestal and grout pad judged to be acceptable.

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage verified per drawing M-1572, Rev. R and M-1590, Sheet 3, Rev.M.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-317 1200108.50-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1E21-CO01 Equipment Class: (6) Vertical Pumps Equipment

==

Description:==

LPCS PUMP Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Seismic Walkdown Team: M. Etre & M. Wodarcyk -9/18/2012 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/17/2012 fe, Michael Wodarcyk 10/17/2012 C-318 1200108.50-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1E21-CO01 Equipment Class: (6) Vertical Pumps Equipment

==

Description:==

LPCS PUMP Photos C-319 12Q0108.50-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1E21-CO01 Equipment Class: (6) Vertical Pumps C-320 12Q0108.50-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: j-1 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1E21-COOI Equipment Class: (6) Vertical Pumps C-321 12Q0108.50-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 1 of 4 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1E21-N003 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks EauiDment

==

Description:==

LPCS PP DISCH FLOW XMITTER Project: LaSalle 1 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 673.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-322 12Q0108.50-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: FY- N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1E21-N003 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

==

Description:==

LPCS PP DISCH FLOW XMITTER Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Overhead light fixture judged to be acceptable.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Seismic Walkdown Team: M. Etre & M. Wodarcyk -9/18/2012 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/17/2012 Michael Wodarcyk 10/17/2012 C-323 12Q0108.50-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1E21-N003 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

==

Description:==

LPCS PP DISCH FLOW XMITTER Photos C-324 1200108.50-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 4 of 4 Status: FYI N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1E21-N003 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks C-325 12QO108.50-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 1 of 4 Status: F-] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment DeNo.: 1E22-CP01 Equipment Class: (6) Vertical Pumps Equipment

==

Description:==

PMP HI PRESS CORE SPRAY Project: LaSalle 1 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 673.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage shown on drawings M-1572, Rev. R and M-1590, Sheet 3, Rev.M.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes C-326 12Q0108.50-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: [- N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1E22-C001 Equipment Class: (6) Vertical Pumps Equipment

==

Description:==

PMP HI PRESS CORE SPRAY Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Overhead light fixtures judged to be acceptable.

Adjacent masonry walls are safety-related per drawing A-218, Rev. T.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Seismic Walkdown Team: D. Carter & J. Griffith -9/4/2012 Evaluated by: Q--0Qk" David Carter Date: 10/17/2012

ý- "v James Griffith 10/17/2012 C-327 12Q0108.50-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: l N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1E22-CO01 Equipment Class: (6) Vertical Pumps Equipment

==

Description:==

PMP HI PRESS CORE SPRAY C-328 12Q0108.50-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 4 of 4 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1E22-CO01 Equipment Class: (6) Vertical Pumps C-329 12Q0108.50-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 1 of 5 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1E22-F004 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Eauioment Descriotion:

HPCS INJECTION ISOL VALVE Project: LaSalle 1 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 761.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-330 12Q0108.50-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: IE22-F004 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

HPCS INJECTION ISOL VALVE Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Overhead light fixture with open S-hooks. Each end of fixture tethered by flexible conduit. No soft targets below. Judged to be acceptable.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Seismic Walkdown Team: D. Carter & J. Griffith -9/4/2012 Evaluated by: , OZ- David Carter Date: 10/17/2012 James Griffith 10/17/2012 C-331 12Q0108.50-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: [Yi N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment

==

Description:==

1 E22-F004 (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves HPCS INJECTION ISOL VALVE C-332 1200108.50-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: E-Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1E22-F004 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Dt- iK'TION ISOL VALVE C-333 12Q0108.50-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: Y-I N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1 E22-F004 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves L C-334 12Q0108.50-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 1 of 4 Status: FYiI N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1E22-F015 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Eauipment

==

Description:==

HPCS PUMP SUP POOL SUCT ISOL VALVE Project: LaSalle 1 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 673.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-335 12Q.108.50-R-O1.

Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1E22-F015 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

HPCS PUMP SUP POOL SUCT ISOL VALVE Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Overhead light fixtures judged to be acceptable.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Seismic Walkdown Team: D. Carter & J. Griffith -9/4/2012 Evaluated by: David Carter Date: 10/17/2012 r" James Griffith 10/17/2012 C-336 1200108.50-R-O01 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1E22-F015 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

HPCS PUMP SUP POOL SUCT ISOL VALVE L C-337 12Q0108.50-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 4 of 4 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1E22-F015 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves C-338 12Q0108.50-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 1 of 6 Status: FYj] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1E22-F023 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

HPCS FULL FLOW TEST ISOL VALVE Project: LaSalle 1 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 694.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-339 12Q0108.50-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 2 of 6 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1E22-F023 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

HPCS FULL FLOW TEST ISOL VALVE Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Seismic Walkdown Team: D. Carter & J. Griffith -9/4/2012 Evaluated by: QJA10yQ---

David Carter Date: 10/17/2012 James Griffith 10/17/2012 C-340 12Q0108.50-R-0O1 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 3 of 6 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment

==

Description:==

1 E22-F023 (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves HPCS FULL FLOW TEST ISOL VALVE Photos C-341 12Q0108.50-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 4 of 6 Status: l7Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: IE22-F023 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Pni inmant frmarrintinn.

WPC!.4 PlI I 1 91ltW TF::QT I'1 \AI VF: C-342 12Q1018.50-R-OO1 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 5 of 6 Status: YI N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1 E22-F023 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves E!C-343 12Q0108.50-R-O01 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 6 of 6 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: 1 E22-F023 (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves PCS FULL FLOW TEST ISOL VALVE LdZdIIl I I I C-344 12Q0108.50-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 1 of 8 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1E22-N004 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

==

Description:==

HPCS PUMP DSCH PRESS Project: LaSalle 1 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 673.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Rack anchored to floor with 8 anchors (4 front, 4 rear).2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No Yes Yes Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-345 12Q0108.50-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 2 of 8 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1E22-N004 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks -Equipment

==

Description:==

HPCS PUMP DSCH PRESS Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Overhead light fixtures judged to be acceptable.

Adjacent masonry walls are safety-related per drawing A-218, Rev. T.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Adjacent supports near rack but clearances are judged to be acceptable.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Seismic Walkdown Team: D. Carter & J. Griffith -9/4/2012 Instrument located on Rack 1 H22-P024.Evaluated by: Q.M',&. David Carter Date: 10/25/2012 James Griffith 10/25/2012 C-346 12Q0108.50-R-O01 Rev. I Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 3 of 8 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1 E22-N004 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

==

Description:==

HPCS PUMP DSCH PRESS C-347 12Q0108.50-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 4 of 8 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1E22-N004 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks LaZanie ]44 C-348 1200108.50-R-o01 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 5 of 8 Status: EI- N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1 E22-N004 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks WD(CH Pf C-349 12Q0108.50-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 6 of 8 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: IE22-N004 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks C-350 12Q0108.50-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 7 of 8 Status: EYI N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1E22-N004 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks C-351 12Q0108.50-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 8 of 8 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1E22-N004 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks L C-352 12Q0108.50-R-0O1 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: 7 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1 E22-N005 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Eauipment

==

Description:==

HPCS PUMP DSCH FLOW Project: LaSalle 1 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 673.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Rack anchored to floor with 8 anchors (4 front, 4 rear).2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

No Yes Yes Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-353 12Q.108.50-R-O.1 Rev. I Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 2 of 2 Status: FYI] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1E22-N005 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

==

Description:==

HPCS PUMP DSCH FLOW Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Overhead light fixtures judged to be acceptable.

Adjacent masonry walls are safety-related per drawing A-218, Rev. T.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Adjacent supports near rack but clearances are judged to be acceptable.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Seismic Walkdown Team: D. Carter & J. Griffith -9/4/2012 Instrument located on Rack 1 H22-P024.For photographs, see SWC for I E22-N004.Evaluated by: P-JAIO,,-

David Carter Date: 10/17/2012 James Griffith 10/17/2012 Photos C-354 12Q0108.50-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet I of 4 Status: EY] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1E51-CO01 Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

==

Description:==

RCIC PUMP Project: LaSalle 1 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 673.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findinqs.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documentinq other comments.Anchoraae 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Minor separations between grout pads and pedestal judged to be acceptable.
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorages shown on drawings M-1572, Rev. R and M-1590, Sheet 3, Rev.M.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes Yes Yes Yes C-355 12Q0108.50-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: F-7 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1E51-CO01 Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

==

Description:==

RCIC PUMP Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Overhead light fixtures judged to be acceptable.

Adjacent masonry wall at stairwell is safety-related per drawing A-217, Rev. R.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Seismic Walkdown Team: D. Carter & J. Griffith -8/29/2012 Evaluated by:

David Carter Date: 10/17/2012 James Griffith 10/17/2012 C-356 12Q0108.50-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: F-ý N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1E51-CO01 Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

==

Description:==

RCIC PUMP C-357 12Q0108.50-R-O01 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 4 of 4 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1E51-CO01 Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps C-358 12Q0108.50-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1E51-F013 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Eauipment Descriotion:

RCIC INJECTION OTBD ISOL VALVE Project: LaSalle 1 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 740.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-359 12Q0108.50-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 2 of 2 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1E51-F013 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves EauiDment

==

Description:==

RCIC INJECTION OTBD ISOL VALVE Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Adjacent masonry wall is safety-related per drawing A-230, Rev. Y 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes Yes Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Seismic Walkdown Team: D. Carter & J. Griffith -8/29/2012 No photographs were taken of this item.Evaluated by: QJA1Q-k--

David Carter Date: 10/17/2012 James Griffith 10/17/2012.

Photos C-360 12Q0108.50-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet I of 4 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1E51-F031 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves EauiDment DescriDtion:

RCIC PUMP SUP POOL SUCT ISOL VALVE Project: LaSalle 1 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 673.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-361 12Q0108.50-R-0O1 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 2 of 4.Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1E51-F031 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

RCIC PUMP SUP POOL SUCT ISOL VALVE Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Light fixture may contact motor-operated valve clutch lever but not in a direction to actuate the MO V. Judged to be of no concern.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Seismic Walkdown Team: D. Carter & J. Griffith -8/29/2012 Evaluated by: Q --. David Carter Date: 10/25/2012,f James Griffith 10/25/2012 C-362 12Q0108.50-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: j-ý N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1E51-F031 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves EauiDment

==

Description:==

RCIC PUMP SUP POOL SUCT ISOL VALVE Photos C-363 12Q0108.50-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 4 of 4 Status: -Y- N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1E51-F031 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves POOL C-364 12Q0108.50-R-OO1 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 1 of 4 Status: FYI N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1E51-F045 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves EauiDment

==

Description:==

RCIC TURBINE STEAM SUPPLY VALVE Project: LaSalle 1 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 673.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-365 12Q0108.50-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: F-Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1E51-F045 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves EQuipment DescriDtion:

RCIC TURBINE STEAM SUPPLY VALVE Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Adjacent masonry waft at stairwell is safety-related per drawing A-217, Rev.R.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Seismic Walkdown Team: D. Carter & J. Griffith -8/29/2012 Evaluated by: JZWO-- David Carter Date: 10/25/2012' James Griffith 10/25/2012 C-366 12Q0108.50-R-001 Rev. I Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1E51-F045 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment

==

Description:==

RCIC TURBINE STEAM SUPPLY VALVE Photos C-367 12Q-108 50-R-Oo1 Rev 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 4 of 4 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1E51-F045 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves 1'Ilt' TI I1 IDDI V x/A I 't/P C-368 12QO108.50-R-O01 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 1 of 11 Status: FY N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1E51-N004 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment

==

Description:==

RCIC PUMP DSCH PRESS Project: LaSalle 1 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 673.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraae 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Minor shrinkage cracking in grout pad judged to be acceptable.

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yes Not Applicable

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-369 12Q0108.50-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 2 of 11 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1E51-N004 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks EauiDment DescriDtion:

RCIC PUMP DSCH PRESS Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Back of rack is close to wall. However, rack is well-braced in the direction perpendicular to the wall. Byjudgment, if rack were to deflect during a seismic event, any contact with the wall would result in insignificant force applied to the rack.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Overhead light fixtures judged to be acceptable.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Seismic Walkdown Team: D. Carter & J. Griffith -8/29/2012 Instrument mounted to Rack 1 H22-POl 7.Evaluated by: )ýZ-V(!k" David Carter Date: 10/25/2012" James Griffith 10/25/2012 C-370 12Q0108.50-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 3 of 11 Status: EZII N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Eauioment DescriDtion:

1 E51 -N004 (18) Instruments on Racks RCIC PUMP DSCH PRESS C-371 12Q0108.50-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 4 of 11 Status: [Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1E51-N004 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks C-372 12Q0108.50-R-001 Rev. I Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 5 of 11 Status: 7 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1E51-IN004 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks L C-373 12Q0108.50-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 6 of 11 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1E51-N004 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks ,H PRE L La~aiie ts-zv-ilz u tb C-374 12Q0108.50-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 7 of 11 Status: E-7 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1E51-N004 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks n, I A1 DR L C-375 12Q0108.50-R-O01 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 8 of 11 Status: F] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1E51-N004 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks nmgnt ngar-rintinn.

In PIU Pl IRAP nrflHw PPPFZO C-376 12Q0108.50-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 9 of 11 Status: F-1 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1E51-N004 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks C-377 12Q0108.50-R-001 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 10 of 11 Status: F-ý N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: 1 E51 -N004 (18) Instruments on Racks C-378 12Q0108.50-R-001 Rev. I Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 11 of 11 Status: F- N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1E51-N004 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks L C-379

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML12353A231&oldid=915921"