ML12353A209
| ML12353A209 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | LaSalle  |
| Issue date: | 11/01/2012 |
| From: | Delaney M Stevenson & Associates |
| To: | Exelon Generation Co, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| RS-12-163 12Q0108.50-R-002, Rev 1 | |
| Download: ML12353A209 (60) | |
Text
... ..... ....... ... ...... .. 7 ..... ... ..... .12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 1 of 4 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2AP78E Equipment Class: (1) Motor Control Centers Equipment
==
Description:==
DIV II 480V MCC 236X-1 Project: LaSalle 2 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
RB, 820.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes Yes Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes Minor shrinkage cracking in floorjudged to be acceptable.
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Anchorage shown on drawings IE-2-3538, Sheet 1, Rev. AE and IE-2-3509, Rev. AJ.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes Yes Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Yes C-55 12Q.108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: F-] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2AP78E Equipment Class: (1) Motor Control Centers EauiDment
==
Description:==
DIV II 480V MCC 236X-1, 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Overhead light fixtures judged to be acceptable.
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Seismic Walkdown Team: D. Carter & J. Griffith -8/28/2012 Evaluated by: QJIJ, David Carter Date: 10/17/2012 James Griffith 10/17/2012 C-56 12Q-108.50-R-002 Rev. I Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: r N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2AP78E Equipment Class: (1) Motor Control Centers Equipment
==
Description:==
DIV II 480V MCC 236X-1 Photos C-57 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 4 of 4 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2AP78E Equipment Class: (1) Motor Control Centers-1 IL C-58 12QO108.50-R-002 Rev. I Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 1 of 4 Status: Eli N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2AP81E Equipment Class: (1) Motor Control Centers Equipment
==
Description:==
DIV II 480V MCC 236X-3 Project: LaSalle 2 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
AB, 731.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional'space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Anchorage verified per drawing IE-2-3444, Sheet 1, Rev. B and IE-2-3434, Sheet 2, Rev. X.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes C-59 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2AP81E Equipment Class: (1) Motor Control Centers Equipment
==
Description:==
DIV II 480V MCC 236X-3 Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Gap between adjacent MCCs 80E & 81E is approximately 1/8" to 1/2". MCC's are stiff in the longitudinal direction.
Therefore, significant displacement in the longitudinal direction is judged to not be credible, and gap is judged to be acceptable.
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Overhead light fixtures judged to be acceptable.
Adjacent masonry wall is safety-related per drawing A-187, Rev. AR.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Seismic Walkdown Team: D. Carter & J. Griffith -8/27/2012 Evaluated by: P.-JA10Q70-David Carter Date: 10/17/2012 James Griffith 10/17/2012 C-60 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: EaUiDment Descriotion:
2AP81 E (1) Motor Control Centers DIV 11 480V MCC 236X-3 Photos C-61 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 4 of 4 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2AP81E Equipment Class: (1) Motor Control Centers L/ II (-3 C-62 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 1 of 5 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2C11-D001002 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment
==
Description:==
CONTROL UNIT CRD HYDRAULIC 22-59 Project: LaSalle 2 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
RB, 761.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Anchorage shown on drawings M-1563, Rev. F and M-1590, Sheet 4, Rev. N.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Scram valves and accumulator well-supported on HCU framework.
C-63 12Qo108.50-R-0O2 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2C11-D001002 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment
==
Description:==
CONTROL UNIT CRD HYDRAULIC 22-59 Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Each fixture support point has 2 chains installed at an angle. Chains are taut;therefore, fixtures cannot swing and fall from S-hooks. Judged to be acceptable.
See IR 1406922.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Seismic Walkdown Team: J. Griffith & M. Wodarcyk-9/10/2012 Evaluated by: 1 James Griffith Date: 10/19/2012
'e Michael Wodarcyk 10/19/2012 C-64 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2C11-D001002 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment
==
Description:==
CONTROL UNIT CRD HYDRAULIC 22-59 20'C-65 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: E-7 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2C11-DO01002 Equipment Class: (0) Other C-66 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2C11-D001002 Equipment Class: (0) Other)1I 20120910-Lasalle 127 C-67 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 1 of 4 Status: [-i N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2C11-D001090 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment
==
Description:==
CONTROL UNIT CRD HYDRAULIC 26-03 Project: LaSalle 2 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
RB, 761.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Anchorage verified per drawings M- 1563, Rev. F and M- 1590, Sheet 4, Rev.N.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Scram valves and accumulator well-supported on HCU framework.
Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes C-68 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2C11-D001090 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment
==
Description:==
CONTROL UNIT CRD HYDRAULIC 26-03 Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Yes Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Each fixture support point has 2 chains installed at an angle. Chains are taut;therefore, fixtures cannot swing and fall from S-hooks. Judged to be acceptable.
See IR 1406922.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Seismic Walkdown Team: J. Griffith & M. Wodarcyk -9/10/2012 Evaluated by: James Griffith Date: 10/19/2012 Michael Wodarcyk 10/19/2012 C-69 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2C11-D001090 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment
==
Description:==
CONTROL UNIT CRD HYDRAULIC 26-03 C-70 12Qo108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 4 of 4 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2C11-DO01090 Equipment Class: (0) Other C-71 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 1 of 5 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2C11-D001095 Equipment Class: (0) Other EauiDment DescriDtion:
CONTROL UNIT CRD HYDRAULIC 34-59 Project: LaSalle 2 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
RB, 761.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Anchorage verified per drawings M-1563, Rev. F and M-1590, Sheet 4, Rev.N.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Scram valves and accumulator well-supported on HCU framework.
Yes Yes C-72 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2C11-D001095 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment
==
Description:==
CONTROL UNIT CRD HYDRAULIC 34-59 Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Each fixture support point has 2 chains installed at an angle. Chains are taut;therefore, fixtures cannot swing and fall from S-hooks. Judged to be acceptable.
See IR 1406922.One light fixture missing one chain support at north end. Flexible conduit feed supports the fixture. Judged to be acceptable.
See IR 1411336.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes Yes Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Seismic Walkdown Team: J. Griffith & M. Wodarcyk -9/10/2012 Evaluated by: D -A James Griffith Date: 10/19/2012
/ al Michael Wodarcyk 10/19/2012 C-73 12QO108.50-R-002 Rev. I Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: [I N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2C11-D001095 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment
==
Description:==
CONTROL UNIT CRD HYDRAULIC 34-59 C-74 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2C11-DO01095 Equipment Class: (0) Other 01!,w10 11:11 2012091 0-Lasalle 154 C-75 12001 08.50-R-002 Rev. I Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2C11-D001095 Equipment Class: (0) Other r'r'C-76 12Q.108.50-R-002 Rev. I Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 1 of 4 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2C11-D001184 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment
==
Description:==
CONTROL UNIT CRD HYDRAULIC 38-07 Project: LaSalle 2 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
RB, 761.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraae 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Anchorage verified per drawings M-1563, Rev. F and M-1590, Sheet 4, Rev.N.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Scram valves and accumulator well-supported on HCU framework.
Yes Yes C-77 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2C11-D001184 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment
==
Description:==
CONTROL UNIT CRD HYDRAULIC 38-07 Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Each fixture support point has 2 chains installed at an angle. Chains are taut;therefore, fixtures cannot swing and fall from S-hooks. Judged to be acceptable.
See IR 1406922.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Seismic Walkdown Team: J. Griffith & M. Wodarcyk -9/10/2012 Evaluated by: James Griffith Date: 10/19/2012 Michael Wodarcyk 10/19/2012 C-78 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: FY] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2C11-D001184 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment
==
Description:==
CONTROL UNIT CRD HYDRAULIC 38-07 Photos 20120910-Lasalle 168 C-79 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 4 of 4 Status: l N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2C11-0001184 Equipment Class: (0) Other rII. .L .. L. .
I III,-" fr~tInI I IljlfIltA I II I." al -i,t F"!20120910-Lasalle 170 2012091 0-Lasalle 171 C-80 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: 7 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2C11-D2259-125 Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Eauioment DescriDtion:
CRD HCU SCRAM WATER ACCUMULATOR Project: LaSalle 2 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
RB, 761.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
The scram water accumulator is an in-line component that is adequately restrained to the CRD/HCU support frame.Yes C-81 1200108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 2 of 2 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2C11-D2259-125 Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment
==
Description:==
CRD HCU SCRAM WATER ACCUMULATOR Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Each fixture support point has 2 chains installed at an angle. Chains are taut;therefore, fixtures cannot swing and fall from S-hooks. Judged to be acceptable.
See IR 1406922.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Seismic Walkdown Team: J. Griffith & M. Wodarcyk -9/10/2012 For photographs, see SWC for 2C11-D001002.
Evaluated by: James Griffith Date: 10/19/2012 Michael Wodarcyk 10/19/2012 Photos C-82 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: F-7 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.:. 2C11-D2259-126 EquipmentClass:
(7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment
==
Description:==
CRD HCU SCRAM INLET VALVE Project: LaSalle 2 SWVEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
RB, 761.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraae 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
The scram inlet valve is an in-line component with the operator adequately restrained to the CRD/HCU support frame.Yes C-83 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 2 of 2 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2C11-D2259-126 Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment
==
Description:==
CRD HCU SCRAM INLET VALVE Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Each fixture support point has 2 chains installed at an angle. Chains are taut;therefore, fixtures cannot swing and fall from S-hooks. Judged to be acceptable.
See IR 1406922.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Seismic Walkdown Team: J. Griffith & M. Wodarcyk -9/10/2012 For photographs, see SWC for 2C1 1-D001002.
Evaluated by: < 1 James Griffith Date: 10/19/2012 Michael Wodarcyk 10/19/2012 Photos C-84 12QO108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: FYI N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2C11-D2259-127 Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment
==
Description:==
CRD HCU SCRAM OUTLET VALVE Project: LaSalle 2 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
RB, 761.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
The scram outlet valve is an in-line component with the operator adequately restrained to the CRD/HCU support frame.Yes C-85 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. I Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 2 of 2 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2C11-D2259-127 Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment
==
Description:==
CRD HCU SCRAM OUTLET VALVE Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Each fixture support point has 2 chains installed at an angle. Chains are taut;therefore, fixtures cannot swing and fall from S-hooks. Judged to be acceptable.
See IR 1406922.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Seismic Walkdown Team: J. Griffith & M. Wodarcyk -9/10/2012 For photographs, see SWC for 2C1 1-DO01 002.Evaluated by: James Griffith Date: 10/19/2012 Michael Wodarcyk 10/19/2012 Photos C-86 12Qo108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2C11-D2603-125 Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers EauiDment
==
Description:==
CRD HCU SCRAM WATER ACCUMULATOR Project: LaSalle 2 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
RB, 761.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraae 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
The scram water accumulator is an in-line component that is adequately restrained to the CRD/HCU support frame.Yes C-87 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 2 of 2 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2C11-D2603-125 Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment
==
Description:==
CRD HCU SCRAM WATER ACCUMULATOR Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Each fixture support point has 2 chains installed at an angle. Chains are taut;therefore, fixtures cannot swing and fall from S-hooks. Judged to be acceptable.
See IR 1406922.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes Yes Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Seismic Walkdown Team: J. Griffith & M. Wodarcyk -9/10/2012 For photographs, see SWC for 2C1 1-D001 090.Evaluated by: James Griffith Date: 10/19/2012 Michael Wodarcyk 10/19/2012 Photos C-88 12QO108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2C11-D2603-126 Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves EauiDment DescriDtion:
CRD HCU SCRAM INLET VALVE Project: LaSalle 2 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
RB, 761.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
The scram inlet valve is an in-line component with the operator adequately restrained to the CRD/HCU support frame.Yes C-89 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 2 of 2 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2C11-D2603-126 Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves EauiDment DescriDtion:
CRD HCU SCRAM INLET VALVE Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Each fixture support point has 2 chains installed at an angle. Chains are taut;therefore, fixtures cannot swing and fall from S-hooks. Judged to be acceptable.
See IR 1406922.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Seismic Walkdown Team: J. Griffith & M. Wodarcyk -9/10/2012 For photographs, see SWC for 2C1 1-D001 090.Evaluated by: ' .James Griffith Date: 10/19/2012 Michael Wodarcyk 10/19/2012 Photos C-90 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. I Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: F-] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2C11-D2603-127 Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment
==
Description:==
CRD HCU SCRAM OUTLET VALVE Project: LaSalle 2 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
RB, 761.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results.of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable 3.Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
The scram outlet valve is an in-line component with the operator adequately restrained to the CRD/HCU support frame.Yes C-91 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 2 of 2 Status: rY7 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2C11-D2603-127 Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment
==
Description:==
CRD HCU SCRAM OUTLET VALVE Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Each fixture support point has 2 chains installed at an angle. Chains are taut;therefore, fixtures cannot swing and fall from S-hooks. Judged to be acceptable.
See IR 1406922.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes Yes Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Seismic Walkdown Team: J. Griffith & M. Wodarcyk -9/10/2012 For photographs, see SWC for 2C1 1-D001090.
Evaluated by: James Griffith Date: 10/19/2012 Michael Wodarcyk 10/19/2012 Photos C-92 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2C11-D3459-125 Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment
==
Description:==
CRD HCU SCRAM WATER ACCUMULATOR Project: LaSalle 2 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
RB, 761.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other'comments.
Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
The scram water accumulator is an in-line component that is adequately restrained to the CRD/HCU support frame.Yes C-93 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 2 of 2 Status: F-] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2C11-D3459-125 Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment
==
Description:==
CRD HCU SCRAM WATER ACCUMULATOR Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Each fixture support point has 2 chains installed at an angle. Chains are taut;therefore, fixtures.cannot swing and fall from S-hooks. Judged to be acceptable.
See IR 1406922.One light fixture missing one chain support at north end. Flexible conduit feed supports the fixture. Judged to be acceptable.
See IR 1411336.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes Yes Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Seismic Walkdown Team: J. Griffith & M. Wodarcyk -9/10/2012 For photographs, see SWC for 2C1 1-D001 095.Evaluated by: James Griffith Date: 10/19/2012 Michael Wodarcyk 10/19/2012 Photos C-94 12QO108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2C11-D3459-126 Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment
==
Description:==
CRD HCU SCRAM INLET VALVE Project: Lasalle 2 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
RB, 761.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
01o 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete nearthe anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
The scram inlet valve is an in-line component with the operator adequately restrained to the CRD/HCU support frame.Yes C-95 12QOi08.50-R-002 Rev. I Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 2 of 2 Status: r N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2C11-D3459-126 Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment'Description:
CRD HCU SCRAM INLET VALVE Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Each fixture support point has 2 chains installed at an angle. Chains are taut;therefore, fixtures cannot swing and fall from S-hooks. Judged to be acceptable.
See IR 1406922.One light fixture missing one chain support at north end. Flexible conduit feed supports the fixture. Judged to be acceptable.
See IR 1411336.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes Yes Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could 'Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Seismic Walkdown Team: J. Griffith & M. Wodarcyk-9/10/2012 For photographs, see SWC for 2C1 1-D001095.
Evaluated by: .#'f James Griffith Date: 10/19/2012 Michael Wodarcyk 10/19/2012 Photos C-96 12Q01 08.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: FY] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2C11-D3459-127 Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment
==
Description:==
CRD HCU SCRAM OUTLET VALVE Project: Lasalle 2 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
RB, 761.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
The scram outlet valve is an in-line component with the operator adequately.restrained to the CRD/HCU support frame.Yes C-97 12Q-108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 2 of 2 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2C11-D3459-127 Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment
==
Description:==
CRD HCU SCRAM OUTLET VALVE Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Each fixture support point has 2 chains installed at an angle. Chains are taut;therefore, fixtures cannot swing and fall from S-hooks. Judged to be acceptable.
See IR 1406922.One light fixture missing one chain support at north end. Flexible conduit feed supports the fixture. Judged to be acceptable.
See IR 1411336.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes Yes Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Seismic Walkdown Team: J. Griffith & M. Wodarcyk -9/10/2012 For photographs, see SWC for 2C1 1-D001095.
Evaluated by: ' ' James Griffith Date: 10/19/2012 Michael Wodarcyk 10/19/2012 Photos C-98 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2C11-D3807-125 Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment
==
Description:==
CRD HCU SCRAM WATER ACCUMULATOR Project: LaSalle 2 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
RB, 761.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findinqs.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
The scram water accumulator is an in-line component that is adequately restrained to the CRD/HCU support frame.Yes C-99 1200108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 2 of 2 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2C11-D3807-125 Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment
==
Description:==
CRD HCU SCRAM WATER ACCUMULATOR Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Each fixture support point has 2 chains installed at an angle. Chains are taut;therefore, fixtures cannot swing and fall from S-hooks. Judged to be acceptable.
See IR 1406922.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Seismic Walkdown Team: J. Griffith & M. Wodarcyk -9/10/2012 For photographs, see SWC for 2C1 1-DO01 184.Evaluated by: James Griffith Date: 10/19/2012 , I , ,Michael Wodarcyk 10/19/2012 Photos C-100 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: F-] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2C11-D3807-126 Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment
==
Description:==
CRD HCU SCRAM INLET VALVE Project: LaSalle 2 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
RB, 761.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
The scram inlet valve is an in-line component with the operator adequately restrained to the CRD/HCU support frame.Yes C-101 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 2 of 2 Status: F-] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2C11-D3807-126 Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment
==
Description:==
CRD HCU SCRAM INLET VALVE Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Each fixture support point has 2 chains installed at an angle. Chains are taut;therefore, fixtures cannot swing and fall from S-hooks. Judged to be acceptable.
See IR 1406922.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Seismic Walkdown Team: J. Griffith & M. Wodarcyk -9/10/2012 For photographs, see SWC for 2C1 1-D001184.
Evaluated by: James Griffith Date: 10/19/2012 Michael Wodarcyk 10/19/2012 Photos C-102 12Q.108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: F7 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2C11-D3807-127 Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves EauiDment DescriDtion:
CRD HCU SCRAM OUTLET VALVE I Project: LaSalle 2 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
RB, 761.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
The scram outlet valve is an in-line component with the operator adequately restrained to the CRD/HCU support frame.Yes C-103 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 2 of 2 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2C11-D3807-127 Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves EQuiDment DescriDtion:
CRD HCU SCRAM OUTLET VALVE Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Each fixture support point has 2 chains installed at an angle. Chains are taut;therefore, fixtures cannot swing and fall from S-hooks. Judged to be acceptable.
See IR 1406922.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?'10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Seismic Walkdown Team: J. Griffith & M. Wodarcyk -9/10/2012 For photographs, see SWC for 2C1 1-D001184.
Evaluated by: James Griffith Date: 10/19/2012 Michael Wodarcyk 10/19/2012 Photos C-104 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 1 of 5 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2C41-AO01 Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment
==
Description:==
TNK STBY LIQUID CONT SOLUTION Project: Lasalle 2 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
RB, 820.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorane 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Anchorage verified per drawings M- 1557, Rev. K and M- 1590, Sheet 7, Rev.J.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
C-105 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 2 of 5 Status:.-FY N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2C41-AO01 Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment
==
Description:==
TNK STBY LIQUID CONT SOLUTION Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Yes Scaffold nearby adequately restrained to tank.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Yes 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Duct is approximately 1/2" from Tank. Tank is rigid, Duct is rigidly supported, both are robust. Seismic energy insufficient to cause interaction.
Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Seismic Walkdown Team: M. Etre & M. Wodarcyk -9/17/2012 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/19/2012 Michael Wodarcyk 10/19/2012 C-106 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2C41-AO01 Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment
==
Description:==
TNK STBY LIQUID CONT SOLUTION Photos C-107 1200108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2C41-AOOI Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers C-108 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2C41-AO01 Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers rn^ainmgnt frinhinnr TKI(" QTRV I IA1 Illl (r)lT QrI ITI.lP C-109 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 1 of 5 Status: F-] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2C41-C001A Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment
==
Description:==
SBLC PMP A Project: LaSalle 2 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
RB, 820.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring suchverification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
Yes Minor lack of engagement on 2 of 7 bolts judged to be acceptable.
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes Minor chipping at pedestal edge, judged to be acceptable.
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Anchorage verified per drawings M-1557, Rev. K and M-1590, Sheet 3, Rev.M.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
C-110 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2C41-CO01A Equipment Class:' (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment
==
Description:==
SBLC PMP A Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not-likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?'10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Seismic Walkdown Team: M. Etre & M. Wodarcyk -9/17/2012 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/19/2012 Michael Wodarcyk 10/19/2012 C-111 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2C41-CO01A Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment
==
Description:==
SBLC PMP A C-112 12Q-108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2C41-CO01A Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps C-113 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2C41-CO01A Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps C-114