ML12353A211

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
12Q0108.50-R-002, Rev. 1, Seismic Walkdown Report in Response to the 50.54(f) Information Request Regarding Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic for the LaSalle County Station, Unit 2, Part 5 of 16
ML12353A211
Person / Time
Site: LaSalle Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 11/01/2012
From: Delaney M
Stevenson & Associates
To:
Exelon Generation Co, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
RS-12-163 12Q0108.50-R-002, Rev 1
Download: ML12353A211 (48)


Text

12Q.108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet I of 4 Status: F N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

2DG01P Equipment Class:

(5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

2A DG COOLING WATER PUMP Project:

LaSalle 2 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

DG, 674.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findinqs. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documentinq other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%

of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes

2.

Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Yes

3.

Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes

4.

Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

Yes

5.

Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note:

This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage shown on drawings M-1573, Rev. G and M-1591, Sheet 3, Rev.

U.

6.

Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes Yes C-179

12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. I Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: F-] N U

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

2DG01P Equipment Class:

(5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

2A DG COOLING WATER PUMP Interaction Effects

7.

Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8.

Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Overhead light fixtures judged to be acceptable.

9.

Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10.

Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11.

Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Seismic Walkdown Team: D. Carter & J. Griffith - 8/28/2012 Evaluated by:

,91doQk. David Carter Date:

10/17/2012 A e James Griffith 10/17/2012 C-180

12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 3 of 4 Status:

-Y-] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

Equipment Class:

Equipment

Description:

2DG01P (5) Horizontal Pumps 2A DG COOLING WATER PUMP Photos C-181

12QO108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 4 of 4 Status: F N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

2DG01P Equipment Class:

(5) Horizontal Pumps TI C-1 82

12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 1 of 8 Status: F N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

2DG01S Equipment Class:

(12) Air Compressors Equipment

Description:

2A DG STARTING AIR COMPRESSOR PACKAGE Project:

LaSalle 2 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

DG, 710.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchoraae

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%

of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes

2.

Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3.

Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4.

Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

Minor shrinkage cracking in floor judged to be acceptable.

5.

Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note:

This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage shown on drawings M-1569, Rev. J and M-1591, Sheet 4, Rev. J.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes C-183

12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 2 of 8 Status: rY N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

2DG01S Equipment Class:

(12) Air Compressors EauiDment DescriDtion:

2A DG STARTING AIR COMPRESSOR PACKAGE Interaction Effects

7.

Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Tube for 2DGO8DB in contact with flexible conduit ground wire. Flexible conduits routed such that they cannot develop sufficient momentum to affect tube. Judged to be acceptable.

8.

Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Overhead light fixtures judged to be acceptable.

Adjacent masonry column pilaster with running bond construction judged to be acceptable.

9.

Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10.

Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11.

Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Flexible 2DGO8CB inner screen in contact with flexible hoses on motor.

Judged to be acceptable.

Comments Seismic Walkdown Team: D. Carter & J. Griffith - 8/28/2012 Evaluated by:

Q-,)IQk David Carter Date:

10/17/2012 James Griffith 10/17/2012 C-184

12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 3 of 8 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

2DG01S Equipment Class:

(12) Air Compressors Equipment

Description:

2A DG STARTING AIR COMPRESSOR PACKAGE Photos C-185

.. 2Q01 08.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 4 of 8 Status: F-ý N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

2DG01S Equipment Class:

(12) Air Compressors L

C-186

12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. I Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 5 of 8 Status:

Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

2DG01S Equipment Class:

(12) Air Compressors C-187

12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 6 of 8 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

2DGOIS Equipment Class:

(12) Air Compressors C-188

1200108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 7 of 8 Status: L-I N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

2DG01S Equipment Class:

(12) Air Compressors C-1 89

12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 8 of 8 Status: F-ý N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

2DG01 S Equipment Class:

(12) Air Compressors L

C-190

12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-1 2-163 Sheet 1 of 6 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

2DG02JA Equipment Class:

(20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment

Description:

2A DG A GENERATOR CONTROL PANEL Project:

LaSalle 2 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

DG, 710.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchora-ge

1.

Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%

Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2.

Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Yes

3.

Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes

4.

Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

Yes Minor shrinkage cracking in floorjudged to be acceptable.

5.

Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note:

Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage shown on drawings IE-2-3433, Rev. AP and IE-2-3437, Rev. AE.

6.

Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-191

12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 2 of 6 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

2DG02JA Equipment Class:

(20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Eauipment

Description:

2A DG A GENERATOR CONTROL PANEL Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Panels 2DGO2JA, 2DGO2JB, and 2DGO3J are bolted together.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Overhead light fixtures judged to be acceptable.

Adjacent masonry column pilaster with running bond construction judged to be acceptable.

9.

Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10.

Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11.

Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

All panel doors were opened. No adverse seismic conditions were observed.

Comments Seismic Walkdown Team: D. Carter & J. Griffith - 8/27/2012 Evaluated by:

Q)M'QJ' David Carter Date:

10/17/2012 James Griffith 10/17/2012 C-192

12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. I Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 3 of 6 Status: ['* N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

2DG02JA Equipment Class:

(20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment

Description:

2A DG A GENERATOR CONTROL PANEL Photos LaSalle Unit 2 116 (11)

La%.>alle unitnz i i o ui)

C-193

12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 4 of 6 Status: f N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

2DG02JA Equipment Class:

(20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets C-1 94

12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 5 of 6 Status: [I N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

2DG02JA Equipment Class:

(20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets C-195

12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 6 of 6 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

2DG02JA Equipment Class:

(20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets

-'1 hI C L

C-1 96

12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 1 of 6 Status: F'* N U

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

2DG03J Equipment Class:

(20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment

Description:

2A DG ENGINE CONTROL PANEL Project:

LaSalle 2 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

DG, 710.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1.

Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%

Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2.

Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Yes

3.

Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes

4.

Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

Yes Minor shrinkage cracking in floor judged to be acceptable.

5.

Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note:

Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage shown on drawings IE-2-3433, Rev. AP and IE-2-3437, Rev. AE.

6.

Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-197

12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 2 of 6 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

2DG03J Equipment Class:

(20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment

Description:

2A DG ENGINE CONTROL PANEL Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Panels 2DGO2JA, 2DGO2JB, and 2DGO3J are bolted together.

8.

Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Overhead light fixtures judged to be acceptable.

Adjacent masonry column pilaster with running bond construction judged to be acceptable.

9.

Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10.

Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11.

Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

All panel doors were opened. No adverse seismic conditions were observed.

Comments Seismic Walkdown Team: D. Carter & J. Griffith - 8/27/2012 Evaluated by:

QJd0-,-.

David Carter Date:

10/17/2012 r"

James Griffith 10/17/2012 C-198

12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 3 of 6 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

2DG03J Equipment Class:

(20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment

Description:

2A DG ENGINE CONTROL PANEL C-199

12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 4 of 6 Status: LY-I N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

2DG03J Equipment Class:

(20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets C-200

1200108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 5 of 6 Status: l N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

2DG03J Equipment Class:

(20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets CONTROL PANEL ITr7' C-201

1200108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 6 of 6 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

2DG03J Equipment Class:

(20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets CONTROL PA C-202

12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 1 of 5 Status: LYý N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

2DG061A Equipment Class:

(7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

2A DG A/C STARTING AIR MOTORS SUPPLY CONTROL VALVE Project:

LaSalle 2 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

DG, 710.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%

of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No

2.

Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Not Applicable

3.

Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4.

Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5.

Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note:

This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

6.

Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes C-203

12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

2DG061A Equipment Class:

(7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

2A DG A/C STARTING AIR MOTORS SUPPLY-CONTROL VALVE Interaction Effects

7.

Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8.

Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Overhead light fixtures judged to be acceptable.

9.

Do attached lines hlave adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Valve and associated fines all mounted to DG skid.

10.

Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11.

Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Seismic Walkdown Team: D. Carter & J. Griffith - 8/28/2012 Evaluated by:

Q-iQk" David Carter Date:

10/17/2012 D '4e James Griffith 10/17/2012 C-204

12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

2DG061A Equipment Class:

(7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment

Description:

2A DG A/C STARTING AIR MOTORS SUPPLY CONTROL VALVE C-205

1200108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: r-v7 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

2DG061A Equipment Class:

(7) Fluid-Operated Valves TING C-206

12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

2DG061A Equipment Class:

(7) Fluid-Operated Valves

=^Imuinm~nt IA

=*l-rin.in.

rA M QTAPTIKM(

AID M'RATIrAPQ Q1 IPPI V C.fIMTPrI

\\IAI XI=

l r'*e \\ i 111*'./ I--*11 \\ IVIV i VI C-207

12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 1 of 5 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

2DO01P Equipment Class:

(5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment

Description:

PUMP, DIESEL OILTRANSFER Project:

LaSalle 2 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

DG, 674.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%

Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2.

Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Yes Minor lack of thread engagement at all anchors judged to be acceptable.

3.

Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes

4.

Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

Yes Minor spalling in concrete at edge of pump base judged to be acceptable.

Minor shrinkage cracking in floor judged to be acceptable.

5.

Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note:

Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage shown on drawing M-1573, Rev. G and M-1591, Sheet.5, Rev. E.

6.

Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-208

12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

2DO01P Equipment Class:

(5) Horizontal Pumps EquiDment DescriDtion:

PUMP. DIESEL OILTRANSFER Interaction Effects

7.

Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8.

Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Overhead light fixtures judged to be acceptable.

9.

Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10.

Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11.

Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Seismic Walkdown Team: D. Carter & J. Griffith - 8/28/2012 Evaluated by:

David Carter Date:

10/17/2012 James Griffith 10/17/2012 C-209

12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: [-7 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

2DO01 P Equipment Class:

(5) Honz EauiDment

Description:

PUMP, D ontal Pumps IESEL OILTRANSFER Photos C-21 0

12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: [-7 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

2DO01P Equipment Class:

(5) Horizontal Pumps L

C-211

12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: F7 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

2DO01P Equipment Class:

(5) Horizontal Pumps L

C-212

12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 1 of 7 Status: F* N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

2DO05T Equipment Class:

(21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment

Description:

DG 2A DAY TK Project:

LaSalle 2 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

DG, 710.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorane

1.

Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%

of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2.

Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3.

Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4.

Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5.

Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note:

This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage shown on drawings M-1569, Rev. J and M-1591, Sheet 3, Rev. U.

6.

Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes C-213

12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 2 of 7 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

2DO05T Equipment Class:

(21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Eauioment DescriDtion:

DG 2A DAY TK Interaction Effects

7.

Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Pipe with valve 2D0059 in contact with tank support piers. Pipe is flexible and piers are robust. Judged to be acceptable.

8.

Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,.and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Overhead light fixtures judged to be acceptable.

Day tank room masonry walls are safety-related per drawing A-280, Rev. AC.

9.

Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10.

Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11.

Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Seismic Walkdown Team: D. Carter & J. Griffith - 8/28/2012 Evaluated by:

QdQJ.

David Carter Date:

10/17/2012 James Griffith 10/17/2012 C-214

12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 3 of 7 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

Equipment Class:

Equipment

Description:

2D005T (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers DG 2A DAY TK C-215

12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 4 of 7 Status: E-I N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

2DO05T Equipment Class:

(21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers C-216

12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 5 of 7 Status: r-] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

2DO05T Equipment Class:

(21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers C-217

12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 6 of 7 Status: FY N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

2DO05T Equipment Class:

(21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers C-218

12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 7 of 7 Status: [Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

2DO05T Equipment Class:

(21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers E ul ment Descri tion:

DG 2A DAY TK LaSalle 8-28-12 046 (8)

LaSalle 8-28-12 046 7 LaSalle 8-28-12 046 (9)

C-219

12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 1 of 7 Status: F N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

2E12-BOO1B Equipment Class:

(21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment

Description:

2B RHR HEAT EXCH Project:

LaSalle 2 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

RB, 710.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%

of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes

2.

Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Yes

3.

Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yes

4.

Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

Heat exchanger mounted to gallery steel.

5.

Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note:

This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage shown on drawings S-819A, Rev. G and S-899A, Rev. F.

6.

Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Not Applicable Yes Yes Interaction Effects

7.

Are soft tarcqets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yes C-220

12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 2 of 7 Status: F N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

-Equipment ID No.:

2E12-B001B Equipment Class:

(21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers EauiDment Descriotion:

2B RHR HEAT EXCH

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?'.

Overhead light fixtures judged to be acceptable.

Adjacent masonry walls are safety-related per drawing. A-227, Rev. V.

9.

Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10.

Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions

11.

Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Seismic Walkdown Team: D. Carter & J. Griffith - 8/29/2012 Evaluated by:

QJA1Qk David Carter Date:

10/17/2012

. James Griffith 10/17/2012 C-221

12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 3 of 7 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

2E12-B001B Equipment Class:

(21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment

Description:

2B RHR HEAT EXCH Photos L

C-222

12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 4 of 7 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

Equipment Class:

2E12-BOO1B (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers L

C-223

12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 5 of 7 Status: EY-I N

U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

2E12-B001B Equipment Class:

(21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers L

C-224

12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 6 of 7 Status: F-] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

2E12-BO01B Equipment Class:

(21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers

A-r t'r U L

C-225

1200108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 7 of 7 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.:

2E12-B001B Equipment Class:

(21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers E ui ment Descri tion:

2B RHR HEAT EXCH LaSalle 8-29-12 240 LaSalle 8-29-12 241 LaSalle 8-29-12 242 C-226