ML12353A215
| ML12353A215 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | LaSalle  |
| Issue date: | 11/01/2012 |
| From: | Delaney M Stevenson & Associates |
| To: | Exelon Generation Co, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| RS-12-163 12Q0108.50-R-002, Rev 1 | |
| Download: ML12353A215 (46) | |
Text
12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 1 of 7 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2E12-F051B Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves EauiDment DescriDtion:
B RHR HX STM INLT PRESS CONTVLV Project: LaSalle 2 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
RB, 710.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Not Applicable Not Applicable
- Not Applicable Not Applicable
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes C-273 12QO108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 2 of 7 Status: FYI N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2E12-F051B Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment
==
Description:==
B RHR HX STM INLT PRESS CONT VLV Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Solenoid valve in contact with crushable insulation is judged to be acceptable.
Gap between tubing and adjacent grating below is approximately 1/8".Significant vertical movement in the tubing during a seismic event is judged to be not credible, therefore the gap is judged to be acceptable.
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Overhead light fixtures judged to be acceptable.
Adjacent masonry walls are safety-related per drawing A-227, Rev. V.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Seismic Walkdown Team: D. Carter & J. Griffith -8/29/2012 Evaluated by: David Carter Date: 10/17/2012"e James Griffith 10/17/2012 C-274 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. I Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 3 of 7 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2E12-FO51B Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment
==
Description:==
B RHR HX STM INLT PRESS CONT VLV C-275 12QO108.50-R-002 Rev. I Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 4 of 7 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2E12-FO51B Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves L C-276 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 5 of 7 Status: F- N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2E12-FO51B Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment
==
Description:==
B RHR HX STM INLT PRESS CONT VLV C-277 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 6 of 7 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2E12-FO51B Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves L C-278 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 7 of 7 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2E12-FO51B Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves TP L C-279 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 1 of 7 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2E12-F055B Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment
==
Description:==
VALVE, RI DISCH LINE RELIEF Project: LaSalle 2 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
RB, 710.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes C-280 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 2 of 7 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2E12-F055B Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment
==
Description:==
VALVE, RI DISCH LINE RELIEF Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Robust valve body in contact with adjacent pipe judged to be acceptable.
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Overhead light fixtures judged to be acceptable.
Adjacent masonry walls are safety-related per drawing A-227, Rev. V.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? " Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Seismic Walkdown Team: D. Carter & J. Griffith -8/29/2012 Evaluated by: 9iJZ. David Carter Date:. 10/17/2012 James Griffith 10/17/2012 C-281 1200i08.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 3 of 7 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: EauiDment Descriotion:
2E1 2-F055B (7) Fliud-Operated Valves VALVE. RI DISCH LINE RELIEF C-282 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 4 of 7 Status: F-] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2E12-FO55B Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves C-283 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. I Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 5 of 7 Status: FY-I N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2E12-F055B Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves C-284 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 6 of 7 Status: [YII N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: 2E1 2-FO55B (7) Fluid-Operated Valves C-285 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 7 of 7 Status: r-Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2E12-F055B Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Eauioment Descridtion:
VALVE. RI DISCH LINE RELIEF C-286 12QO108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 1 of 5 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2E12-F068A Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment
==
Description:==
A RHR HEAT EXCH OTLT Project: LaSalle 2 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
RB, 673.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes C-287 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2E12-F068A Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment
==
Description:==
A RHR HEAT EXCH OTLT Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Valve mounted high overhead; few overhead items can impact valve.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Minor corrosion in mounting bolts from motor to valve judged to be acceptable.
Comments Seismic Walkdown Team: M. Etre & M. Wodarcyk -9/18/2012 Evaluated by: Mark Etre Date: 10/19/2012 Michael Wodarcyk 10/19/2012 C-288 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. I Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2E12-F068A Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment
==
Description:==
A RHR HEAT EXCH OTLT C-289 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2E12-F068A Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves C-290 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2E12-FO68A Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves EauiDment DescriDtion:
A RHR HEAT EXCH OTLT C-291 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2E12-F068B Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment
==
Description:==
B RHR HEAT EXCH OTLT STOP VLV Project: LaSalle 2 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
RB, 673.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes C-292 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 2 of 2 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2E12-F068B Equipment Class:. (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment
==
Description:==
B RHR HEAT EXCH OTLT STOP VLV Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Overhead light fixtures judged to be acceptable.
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Seismic Walkdown Team: D. Carter & J. Griffith -8/30/2012 No photographs of this item were taken.Evaluated by: 9JAIQ-- David Carter Date: 10/17/2012
ý- James Griffith 10/17/2012 C-293 12Q.108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: [7 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2E12-N005B Equipment Class: (19) Temperature Sensors Equipment
==
Description:==
RHR HE 2B SERV WTR DISCH TEMP Project: -LaSalle 2 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
RB, 694.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes C-294 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2E12-NO05B Equipment Class: (19) Temperature Sensors Equipment
==
Description:==
RHR HE 2B SERV WTR DISCH TEMP Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from. impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Seismic Walkdown Team: D. Carter & J. Griffith -8/29/2012 Located in pipe just above floor.Evaluated by:
David Carter Date: 10/17/2012 James Griffith 10/17/2012 C-295 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. I Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: F-ý N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: EauiDment DescriDtion:
2E1 2-NOB5B 019) Temperature Sensors RHR HE 2B SERV WTR DISCH TEMP Photos L C-296 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet I of 10 Status: LD N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2E12-N007B Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment
==
Description:==
RHR HE 2B SERV WTR INLET FLOW Project: LaSalle 2 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
RB, 673.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Rack anchored to floor at front and rear with shell- and wedge-type anchors.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?No Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Not Applicable
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes C-297 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 2 of 10-Status: r N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2E12-N007B Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment
==
Description:==
RHR HE 2B SERV WTR INLET FLOW Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Approximate 1" gap between rear of panel and wall judged to be acceptable.
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Overhead light fixtures judged to be acceptable.
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Approximate 1/4" clearance between bottom of pipe support horizontal member and top of rack judged to be acceptable.
Comments Seismic Walkdown Team: D. Carter & J. Griffith -8/30/2012 Instrument located on Rack 2H22-P021.
Evaluated by: ,A/0-4,- David Carter Date: 10/17/2012 4ý b James Griffith 10/17/2012 C-298 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 3 of 10 Status: F] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2E12-NO07B Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment
==
Description:==
RHR HE 2B SERV WTR INLET FLOW C-299 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 4 of 10 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2E12-NO07B Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks TI C-300 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 5 of 10 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2E12-NO07B Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks V WTR I C-301 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 6 of 10 Status: [Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2E12-NO07B Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks RVWTR C-302 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 7 of 10 Status: [-1 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2E12-NO07B Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks nI= iinmgnf I'a-r-r-ninn.
DRW 1W41= 9R .gP\I AITIP IMI 9T P1 AW V II C-303 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. I Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 8 of 10 Status: [7 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2E12-NO07B Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Ti C-304 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 9 of 10 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2E12-NO07B Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on RaCks'WTR INLET FLOW C-305 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 10 of 10 Status: F-] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2E12-NO07B Equipment Class: (18) Instruments oR Racks I HE2B SERV WrR C-306 12QO108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: 7 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2E12-N015B Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment
==
Description:==
RHR FLOW 2B Project: LaSalle 2 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
RB, 673.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Rack anchored to floor at front and rear with shell- and wedge-type anchors.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?No Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Not Applicable
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes C-307 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 2 of 2 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2E12-N015B Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Eauioment
==
Description:==
RHR FLOW 2B Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Approximate 1" gap between rear of panel and wall judged to be acceptable.
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Overhead light fixtures judged to be acceptable.
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Approximate 1/4" clearance between bottom of pipe support horizontal member and top of rack judged to be acceptable.
Comments Seismic Walkdown Team: D. Carter & J. Griffith -8/30/2012 Instrument located on Rack 2H22-P021.
For photographs, see SWC for 2E12-N007B.
Evaluated by: David Carter Date: 10/17/2012 D James Griffith 10/17/2012 Photos C-308 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 1 of 4 Status: F-] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2E12-N027B Equipment Class: (19) Temperature Sensors Equipment
==
Description:==
RHR HE 2B DISCH TO'RX VESSEL TEMP Project: LaSalle 2 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
RB, 694.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% .for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes C-309 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2E12-N027B Equipment Class: (19) Temperature Sensors Equipment
==
Description:==
RHR HE 2B DISCH TO RX VESSEL TEMP Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Overhead light fixtures judged to be acceptable.
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Seismic Walkdown Team: D. Carter & J. Griffith -8/30/2012 Evaluated by: ,P,-AIQ-k David Carter Date: 10/17/2012 James Griffith 10/17/2012 C-310 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2E12-N027B Equipment Class: (19) Temperature Sensors Equipment
==
Description:==
RHR HE 2B DISCH TO RX VESSEL TEMP Photos L C-311 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 4 of 4 Status: [] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EQuipment ID No.: 2E12-N027B Equipment Class: (19) Temperature Sensors C-312 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet I of 2 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2E12-N034B Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment
==
Description:==
RHR PUMP 2B DISCH PRESSURE Project: LaSalle 2 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
RB, 673.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Rack anchored to floor at front and rear with shell- and wedge-type anchors.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?No Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Not Applicable
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes C-313 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 2 of 2 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2E12-N034B Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment
==
Description:==
RHR PUMP 2B DISCH PRESSURE Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Approximate 1" gap between rear of panel and wall judged to be acceptable.
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Overhead light fixtures judged to be acceptable.
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Approximate 1/4" clearance between bottom of pipe support horizontal member and top of rack judged to be acceptable.
Comments Seismic Walkdown Team: D. Carter & J. Griffith -8/30/2012 Instrument located on Rack 2H22-P021.
For photographs, see SWC for 2E12-N007B.
Evaluated by: P-JNO-47 David Carter Date: 10/17/2012 James Griffith 10/17/2012 Photos C-314 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 1 of 4 Status: -IN U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2E21-CO01 Equipment Class: (6) Vertical Pumps Equipment
==
Description:==
PMP LO PRESS CORE SPRAY Project: LaSalle 2 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
RB, 673.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraae 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes Minor chips and shrinkage cracks in grout pad and pedestal judged to be acceptable.
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Anchorage verified per drawing M-1573, Rev. G and M-1590, Sheet 3, Rev.M.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
C-315 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. I Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2E21-CO01 Equipment Class: (6) Vertical Pumps Equipment
==
Description:==
PMP LO PRESS CORE SPRAY Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Seismic Walkdown Team: M. Etre & M. Wodarcyk -9/18/2012 Evaluated by: "ý Mark Etre Date: 10/19/2012 Michael Wodarcyk 10/19/2012 C-316 1200108.50-R-002 Rev. I Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Eauipment
==
Description:==
2E21-CO01 (6) Vertical Pumps PMP LO PRESS CORE SPRAY Photos C-317 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 4 of 4 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2E21-CO01 Equipment Class: (6) Vertical Pumps C-318