ML12353A216
| ML12353A216 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | LaSalle  |
| Issue date: | 11/01/2012 |
| From: | Delaney M Stevenson & Associates |
| To: | Exelon Generation Co, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| RS-12-163 12Q0108.50-R-002, Rev 1 | |
| Download: ML12353A216 (52) | |
Text
12QO108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 1 of 5 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2E21-N003 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment
==
Description:==
LPCS PP DISCH FLOW XMITTER Project: LaSalle 2 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
RB, 673.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?No Yes Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Not Applicable
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes C-319 1200108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: FY] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2E21-N003 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment
==
Description:==
LPCS PP DISCH FLOW XMITTER Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Overhead light fixtures judged to be acceptable.
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Seismic Walkdown Team: M. Etre & M. Wodarcyk -9/18/2012 Evaluated by: f Mark Etre Date: 10/19/2012 Michael Wodarcyk 10/19/2012 C-320 12QO108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2E21-N003 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment
==
Description:==
LPCS PP DISCH FLOW XMITTER Photos zuI C-321 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: F-1 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2E21-N003 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks C-322 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: FY-] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2E21-N003 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Pm oinm~nn Mer-rinfinn I Dr'Q DD lnlQCI-I 11 MAI YRAITT0 20'C-323 12Q.108.50-R-002 Rev. I Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet I of 6 Status: F] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2E22-C001 Equipment Class: (6) Vertical Pumps Equipment
==
Description:==
PMP HI PRESS CORE SPRAY Project: LaSalle 2 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
RB, 673.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findinqs.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Anchorage shown on drawings M- 1573, Rev. G and M- 1590, Sheet 3, Rev.M.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes Yes C-324 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 2 of 6 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2E22-CO01 Equipment Class: (6) Vertical Pumps Equipment
==
Description:==
PMP HI PRESS CORE SPRAY Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Overhead light fixtures judged to be acceptable.
Adjacent masonry walls are safety-related per drawing A-220, Rev. N.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Seismic Walkdown Team: D. Carter & J. Griffith -9/4/2012 Evaluated by: QJA/Qk David Carter Date: 10/17/2012 James Griffith 10/17/2012 C-325 1200108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 3 of 6 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2E22-CO01 Equipment Class: (6) Vertical Pumps Equipment
==
Description:==
PMP HI PRESS CORE SPRAY C-326 12QO108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 4 of 6 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2E22-CO01 Equipment Class: (6) Vertical Pumps C-327 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 5 of 6 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2E22-CO01 Equipment Class: (6) Vertical Pumps C-328 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 6 of 6 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2E22-CO01 Equipment Class: (6) Vertical Pumps EauiDment
==
Description:==
PMP HI PRESS CORE SPRAY C-329 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 1 of 4 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2E22-F004 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves EauiDment DescriDtion:
HPCS INJECTION ISOL VALVE Project: LaSalle 2 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
RB, 761.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes C-330 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2E22-F004 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment
==
Description:==
HPCS INJECTION ISOL VALVE Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Seismic Walkdown Team: D. Carter & J. Griffith -9/4/2012 Evaluated by: , 4 Jd/Qk David Carter Date: 10/17/2012 James Griffith .10/17/2012 C-331 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Eauioment Descriotion:
2E22-F004 (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves HPCS INJECTION ISOL VALVE Photos C-332 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 4 of 4 Status: FY-] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: 2E22-F004 (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves UDrIO IKI IMIT L C-333 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 1 of 4 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2E22-F015 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment
==
Description:==
HPCS PUMP SUP POOL SUCT ISOL VALVE Project: LaSalle 2 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
RB, 673.00.ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findinqs.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documentinq other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes C-334 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: F-ý N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2E22-F015 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Eauioment Descriotion:
HPCS PUMP SUP POOL SUCT ISOL VALVE Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Seismic Walkdown Team: D. Carter & J. Griffith -9/4/2012 Evaluated by: Q-&1Qk David Carter Date: 10/17/2012 James Griffith 10/17/2012 C-335 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.. RS-12-163 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment
==
Description:==
2E22-FO1 5 (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves HPCS PUMP SUP POOL SUCT ISOL VALVE C-336 1200108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 4 of 4 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2E22-FO15 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves I-IPI POOL C-337 1200108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 1 of 4 Status: [-7 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2E22-F023 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves EauiDment
==
Description:==
HPCS FULL FLOW TEST ISOL VALVE Project: LaSalle 2 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
RB, 694.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Yes C-338 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: [-ý N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2E22-F023 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment
==
Description:==
HPCS FULL FLOW TEST ISOL VALVE 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Overhead light fixtures judged to be acceptable.
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Seismic Walkdown Team: D. Carter & J. Griffith -9/4/2012 Evaluated by: ZA10/47- David Carter Date: 10/17/2012 r" James Griffith 10/17/2012 C-339 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: [-Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment
==
Description:==
2E22-F023 (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves HPCS FULL FLOW TEST ISOL VALVE Photos C-340 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. I Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 4 of 4 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2E22-F023 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves LaOalle V40 C-341 12QO108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 1 of 8 Status: FjjJ N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2E22-N004 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Eauipment
==
Description:==
HPCS PP DISCH PRESS XMITTER Project: LaSalle 2 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
RB, 673.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Rack anchored to floor with 8 anchors (4 front, 4 rear).2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?No Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Not Applicable
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes C-342 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 2 of 8 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2E22-N004 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment
==
Description:==
HPCS PP DISCH PRESS XMITTER Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Overhead light fixtures judged to be acceptable.
Adjacent masonry walls are safety related per drawing A-220, Rev. N.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Contact between tubes and flexible conduits is judged to be acceptable.
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Missing clamp for tube at first support location above valve 2E22-NO05-HRR.
Span between valve and first acceptable support is relatively short. As-found condition judged to be acceptable.
See IR 1419068.Comments Seismic Walkdown Team: D. Carter & J. Griffith -9/4/2012 Instrument located on Rack 2H22-P024.
Evaluated by: David Carter Date: 10/17/2012 AP41James Griffith 10/17/2012 C-343 1200108.50-R-002 Rev. I Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 3 of 8 Status: F-ý N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2E22-N004 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment
==
Description:==
HPCS PP DISCH PRESS XMITTER Photos C-344 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 4 of 8 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2E22-N004 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks C-345 1200108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 5 of 8 Status: r-7 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2E22-N004 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks ('0 MM L C-346 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 6 of 8 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2E22-N004 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks WDrQ DD flIQCLJ D9 C-347 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 7 of 8 Status: F-7 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2E22-N004 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks'. I-DI I , DD C-348 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 8 of 8 Status: ElI N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2E22-N004 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks pment
Description:
HPCS PP DISCH PRESS, L C-349 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 1 of 8 Status: F7J N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2E22-N005 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment
==
Description:==
HPCS PP DISCH FLOW XMITTER Project: LaSalle 2 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
RB, 673.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Rack anchored to floor with 8 anchors (4 front, 4 rear).2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?No Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Not Applicable
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes C-350 12QO108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 2 of 8 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2E22-N005 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment
==
Description:==
HPCS PP DISCH FLOW XMITTER Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Overhead light fixtures judged to be acceptable.
Adjacent masonry walls are safety related per drawing A-220, Rev. N.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Contact between tubes and flexible conduits is judged to be acceptable.
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Missing clamp for tube at first support location above valve 2E22-NO05-HRR.
Span between valve and first acceptable support is relatively short. As-found condition judged to be acceptable.
See IR 1419068.Comments Seismic Walkdown Team: D. Carter & J. Griffith -9/4/2012 Instrument located on Rack 2H22-P024.
Evaluated by: ,-J/AIQ,--
David Carter Date: 10/17/2012 Ae James Griffith 10/17/2012 C-351 12QO108.50-R-002 Rev. I Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 3 of 8 Status: F-ý N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2E22-N005 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment
==
Description:==
HPCS PP DISCH FLOW XMITTER L C-352 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 4 of 8 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2E22-N005 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks inment Descrintion:
HPCS PP DISCH FLOWX L.C-353 1200108.50-R-002 Rev. I Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 5 of 8 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2E22-N005 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks L C-354 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 6 of 8 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2E22-N005 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks C-355 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 7 of 8 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2E22-N005 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks L C-356 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 8 of 8 Status: r-Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2E22-N005 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks C-357 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 1 of 6 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2E51-C001 Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps EauiDment DescriDtion:
RX CORE ISOL COOLING PMP Project:-
LaSalle 2 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
RB, 673.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes Yes Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Anchorage shown on drawings M-1573, Rev. G and M-1590, Sheet 3, Rev.M.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes C-358 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 2 of 6 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2E51-CO01 Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment
==
Description:==
RX CORE ISOL COOLING PMP Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Overhead light fixtures judged to be acceptable.
Adjacent masonry walls are safety-related per drawing A-219, Rev. M.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Seismic Walkdown Team: J. Griffith & M. Wodarcyk -9/11/2012 Evaluated by: James Griffith Date: 10/19/2012 Michael Wodarcyk 10/19/2012 C-359 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 3 of 6 Status: l N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2E51 -CO01 Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment
==
Description:==
RX CORE ISOL COOLING PMP C-360 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 4 of 6 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2E51 -CO01 Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps C-361 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 5 of 6 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2E51-CO01 Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps C-362 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 6 of 6 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2E51 -CO01 Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps C-363 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. I Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet I of 4 Status: FY] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2E51-F013 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves EauiDment DescriDtion:
RCIC INJECTION STOP Project: LaSalle 2 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
RB, 740.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes C-364 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: FY] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2E51-F013 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment
==
Description:==
RCIC INJECTION STOP Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Overhead light fixtures judged to be acceptable.
Adjacent masonry wall is safety-related per drawing A-232, Rev. AL.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions 11.. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Yes Comments Seismic Walkdown Team: J. Griffith & M. Wodarcyk -9/10/2012 Evaluated by: James Griffith Date: 10/19/2012 Michael Wodarcyk 10/19/2012 C-365 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2E51-F013 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves EauiDment
==
Description:==
RCIC INJECTION STOP C-366 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 4 of 4 Status: E-I N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2E51-F013 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment
==
Description:==
RCIC INJECTION STOP C-367 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: FYI N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2E51-F031 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves EauiDment DescriDtion:
RCIC PMP SUCT FROM SUP POOL STOP Project: LaSalle 2 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
RB, 673.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes C-368 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2E51-F031 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment
==
Description:==
RCIC PMP SUCT FROM SUP POOL STOP Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Overhead light fixtures judged to be acceptable.
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Seismic Walkdown Team: J. Griffith & M. Wodarcyk -9/11/2012 EPN tag obscured.
Correct item verified by Operations.
Evaluated by: James Griffith Date: 10/19/2012 Michael Wodarcyk 10/19/2012 C-369 12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: [] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 2E51-F031 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment
==
Description:==