W3F1-2012-0099, Request for Alternative W3-1SI-021, ASME Code Case N-770-1 Baseline Examination Request for Alternative

From kanterella
(Redirected from ML12339A070)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Request for Alternative W3-1SI-021, ASME Code Case N-770-1 Baseline Examination Request for Alternative
ML12339A070
Person / Time
Site: Waterford Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 11/30/2012
From: Mason M
Entergy Operations
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
W3F1-2012-0099
Download: ML12339A070 (34)
v • d • e


Text

Entergy Operations, Inc.

17265 River Road Killona, LA 70057-3093 Tel 504 739 6673 Fax 504 739 6698

-Ente g mmason@entergy.com Michael E. Mason Licensing Manager, Acting Waterford 3 W3F1-2012-0099 November 30, 2012 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555-0001

Subject:

Waterford 3 Request for Alternative W3-1SI-021, ASME Code Case N-770-1 Baseline Examination Request for Alternative Waterford Steam Electric Station, Unit 3 Docket No. 50-382 License No. NPF-38

Dear Sir or Madam:

Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.55a(a)(3)(i), Entergy Operations, Inc. (Entergy) hereby requests NRC approval of the attached Inservice Inspection (IS[) Request for Alternative for Waterford Steam Electric Station Unit 3 (WF3). This alternative is for the current third ten-year ISI interval.

The request is associated with the use of an alternative to the requirements of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Code Case N-770-1 as conditioned in the Final Rule 10 CFR 50.55a(g)(6)(ii)(F)(3), dated June 21, 2011.

To support the startup of WF3 following its refueling outage in the Fall of 2012, Entergy requests approval of this alternative by December 21, 2012.

This letter contains one commitment. If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact the acti "sin Manager, Michael E. Mason, at (504) 739-6673.

Sincerely, MEM/RJP Attachments: 1) Request for Alternative W3-1SI-021

2) Weld 08-007 Examination Report: Refueling Outage 18
3) List of Regulatory Commitments

W3F1-2012-0099 Page 2, cc: Mr. Elmo E. Collins, Jr. RidsRgn4MailCenter@nrc.gov Regional Administrator U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region IV 1600 E. Lamar Blvd.

Arlington, TX 76011-4511 NRC Senior Resident Inspector Marlone.Davis@nrc.gov Waterford Steam Electric Station Unit 3 Dean.Overland@nrc.gov P.O. Box 822 Killona, LA 70066-0751 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Kaly.Kalyanam@nrc.gov Attn: Mr. N. Kalyanam Mail Stop O-07D1 Washington, DC 20555-0001

Attachment I to W3FI-2012-0099 Request for Alternative W3-ISI-021 to W3F1-2012-0099 Page 1 of 6 Waterford 3 Request for Alternative In Accordance with 10 CFR50.55a(g)(3)(i)

--Alternative Provides Acceptable Level of Quality and Safety-

1. ASME Code Component Affected Class 1 Weld 08-007, RCP-1A Cold Leg Charging Nozzle
2. Applicable Code Edition Code of Record: AMSE Section XI, 2001 Edition through 2003 Addenda as amended by 10CFR50.55a (2011)

ASME Code Case N-770-1 Code Class: American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Class I Code Case N-770-1: Item B - Unmitigated butt weld at cold leg operating temperature Unit / Inspection Interval: Waterford Steam Electric Station, Unit 3 / Third Ten-Year Interval May 31, 2008 through June 30, 2017

3. Applicable Code Requirement

The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Rules for Inservice Inspection of Nuclear Power-Plant Components,Section XI, 2001 Edition through 2003 Addenda, as amended by 1 OCFR50.55a (2011).

With the issuance of a revised 10 CFR 50.55a in June 2011, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff incorporated by reference Code Case N-770-1, "Alternative Examination Requirements and Acceptance Standards for Class 1 PWR Piping and Vessel Nozzle Butt Welds Fabricated with UNS N06082 or UNS W86182 Weld Filler Material With or Without Application of listed Mitigation Activities, Section Xl, Division 1." Specific implementing requirements are documented in 10 CFR 50.55a(g)(6)(ii)(F) and are listed below:

A. 10 CFR 50.55a(g)(6)(ii)(F)(1), effective date August 22, 2011, requires "licensees of existing, operating pressurized water reactors as of July 21,2011, shall implement the requirements of ASME Code Case N-770-1, subject to the conditions specified in paragraphs (g)(6)(ii)(F)(2) through (g)(6)(ii)(F)(10) of this section, by the first refueling outage after August 22, 2011."

B. Regulation 10 CFR 50.55a(g)(6)(ii)(F)(3) states that baseline examinations for welds in Code Case N-770-1, Table 1, Inspection Items A-i, A-2, and B, "shall be completed by the end of the next refueling outage after January 20, 2012.

Weld 08-007 is classified as Inspection item B' (described below) for which visual and essentially 100% volumetric examination, as amended by 10 CFR 50.55a(g)(6)(ii)(F)(4), are required.

to W3F1 -2012-0099 Page 2 of 6

.ASME.Cbde Case N-770-1 asAmended by 1,OCFR50.55a(g)(6)(ii)(F)(4) -

Class 1,PWRPressureRetainingDissimilar Metal-Piping and Vessel:Nozzle ButtWelds Containng Alloy 82/1862

'.,.Pats Extent and. Frequen6y of Exami nation Parts -ExmInspe

'H,~ Exained Item,~:::

Bare metal visual examination once per interval Unmitigated butt weld at Cold Leg operating Essentially 100% volumetric examination for axial and temperature (-2410) B circumferential flaws in accordance with the applicable t 525°T (2741C) and requirements of ASME Section Xl, Appendix VIII, every

  • 58 0T (304'C) second inspection period not to exceed 7 years. Baseline

< 580°F (304 0 C) examinations shall be completed by the end of the next refueling outage after January 20, 2012.

4. Reason for Request

Class 1 Weld 08-007, RCP-1A Cold Leg Charging Nozzle, is required to have a visual and essentially 100% volumetric examination, as amended by 10 CFR 50.55a(g)(6)(ii)(F)(4),

prior to startup following Refueling Outage 18, which is currently in progress.

There is not a currently qualified procedure to examine Weld 08-007 due to the weld configuration being outside the Performance Demonstrative Initiative (PDI) qualified mockups and procedures for the thickness and tapered angle ranges.

Prior to the current refueling outage (RF18), Entergy requested Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) to review the dissimilar metal (DM) welds scheduled to be performed during the outage, to confirm these welds were covered by the PDI mockups and procedures. As a result of this assessment, EPRI identified weld 08-007 as potentially being outside of the configurations covered by PDI mockups and EPRI procedures. Entergy requested EPRI to expand the EPRI DM Phased Array procedure to include the Waterford Unit 3 Charging nozzle tapered angle. In order to ensure that the 08-007 component would be covered under-this expansion, it was necessary for Waterford 3 to obtain additional measurements of the weld during the outage to verify the thicknesses and diameters were within the PDI configuration mockup qualified ranges. Following EPRI's review of the additional field measurements taken, they concluded the weld thickness and tapered angles were outside of the PDI mockup range of applicability.

Entergy collaborated with our Ultrasonic Examination (UT) vendor to determine what technique would provide a reliable examination with high confidence of the detection of an' ID connected planer flaws in either the axial or circumferential directions. The examination technique recommended and performed in Refueling Outage 18 was the technique qualified by EPRI for the other Charging Nozzle. The resultant examination volume coverage was 100% of the susceptible material. See Attachment 2, Weld 08-007 Examination Report:

Refueling Outage 18, for technique information and examination results. This technique was qualified and used on other components with similar configurations, tapers, and thicknesses.

Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.55a(a)(3)(i), Entergy Operations, Inc. (Entergy) requests an altemative to the requirements of Code Case N770-1, as conditioned in the Final Rule 10 to W3F1 -2012-0099 Page 3 of 6 CFR 50.55a(g)(6)(ii)(F)(3) for the Fall 2012 Waterford 3 refueling outage. Entergy is requesting permission to defer the 10 CFR50.55a(g)(6)(ii)(F)(3) baseline volumetric examination of weld 08-007, 2 inch cold leg charging nozzle to safe end DM butt weld, for one cycle past the required deadline specified in 10 CFR 50.55a(g)(6)(ii)(F)(3).

5. Proposed Alternative and Basis for Use Proposed Alternative Entergy will perform appropriate actions to comply with ASME Section Xl Code Case N-770-1 baseline examinations for dissimilar metal weld 08-007, which did not meet the examination requirements during the 2012 refueling outage, prior to startup from the planned Spring 2014 refueling outage. Actions to accomplish compliance with ASME Section Xl Code Case N-770-1 consist of the following:
1. Entergy will work with EPRI to design a mock up that incorporates the configuration of the Waterford 3 08-007 DM weld.
2. This mock-up will be used to demonstrate/qualify the UT technique utilized during the Fall 2012 refueling outage (RF18). This UT technique will be performed in accordance with the PDI Site Specific Configuration Mockup Requirements for DM Welds or through procedure expansion in accordance with the PDI Program. Ifthe demonstration should determine that additional scanning is required, Entergy will reexamine weld 08-007 during the scheduled Spring 2014 refueling outage using the newly qualified PDI technique for this configuration.

Basis for Use Entergy's Waterford Steam Electric Station Unit 3 plant is a Combustion Engineering design.

Weld 08-007 on the charging nozzle joins a SA-1 82 nozzle with SA-240-304L stainless steel cladding and ENiCrFe-3 bevel face buttering to a SA-1 82, Type 316 stainless steel safe end.

A "best effort" examination technique was performed on Weld 08&007 using the technique qualified by EPRI for the Charging Nozzle tapered configuration. EPRI procedure for Manual Phased Array Ultrasonic examination of Dissimilar Metal Welds (EPRI-DMW-PA-1) provides for this technique, and was successfully used on this and other components with similar configurations, tapers, and thicknesses.

The equipment, procedure, and personnel utilized for the performance of the "best effort" examination were qualified in accordance with the requirements of ASME Section Xl, Appendix VIII, Supplement .10, as implemented through the Performance Demonstration Initiative (PDI) program. Our Vendor was qualified through the Performance Demonstration Initiative (PDI) and we provided Entergy oversight of the process. Procedure EPRI-DMW-PA-1 Revision 2, for the Phased Array Ultrasonic Examination of Dissimilar Metal Welds, was used to perform the examinations.

While the thickness and tapers of weld 08-007 were outside the EPRI qualified ranges, the technique used provided a reliable examination with high confidence of the detection of an ID connected planer flaw in either the axial or circumferential directions. Entergy considers this a "best effort" examination and fully believes that the techniques employed for this to W3F1 -2012-0099 Page 4 of 6 examination were sufficient and capable of detecting any ID connected flaws, thus providing assurance the weld is acceptable. Note, there was an acceptable recordable spot indication found on one scan direction of 32% of reference in the safe end base metal outside of the examination volume with the indication being seen in the other 3 scanning directions but at below recordable amplitudes.

The Materials Reliability Program document MRP-1 39 "Primary System Piping Butt Weld Inspection and Evaluation Guidelines" was not applicable for welds less than 4 inch NPS.

Issuance of the revised final rule 10CFR50.55a effective on August 22, 2011 to require implementation of ASME Code Case N-770-1 made UT exams applicable for welds up to 2 inch NPS. Therefore, this weld was never inspected using a PDI qualified examination.

Weld 08-007 is found in cold leg temperature (Tcold) regions of the system. This means there is a lower probability of crack initiation, and a slower crack growth rate. This weld is also very highly flaw tolerant, as demonstrated in the MRP-1 09 report (reference 1).

PWSCC is least likely to occur in cold leg temperature penetrations. No service-induced flaws have been found in small diameter pipes, even though most of the plants of interest have been in service for over 25 years (reference 2).

If a flaw in this nozzle to safe end weld led to leakage, the leak detection methodology presently used by the industry is very sensitive. After a number of recent operating events, the industry imposed an NEI 03-08 "needed" requirement, to improve leak detection capability. As a result, virtually all pressurized water reactors (PWRs) in the United States, including Waterford 3, have a leak detection capability of less than or equal to 0.1 gpm (reference 3). All plants, including Waterford 3, also monitor seven day moving averages of reactor coolant system leak rates.

Action response times following a leak detection vary based on the action level exceeded,

.and range up to containment entry to identify the source of the leak. Utilities take the commitment of shutdowns due to unidentified leakage seriously.

Action levels have been standardized for all PWRs, and are based on deviations from:

- The seven day rolling average,

  • Specific values, and
  • The baseline mean.

Leak rate action levels are identified in Pressurized Water Reactor Owners Group (PWROG) report, WCAP-1 6465 (reference 4), and are stated below:

Each. PWR utility is required to implement the following standard action levels for reactor coolant system (RCS) inventory balance in their RCS leakage monitoring program.

A: Action levels on the absolute value of unidentified RCS inventory balance (from surveillance data):

Level 1 - One seven day rolling average of unidentified RCS inventory balance values greater than 0.1 gpm.

Level 2 - Two consecutive unidentified RCS inventory balance values greater than 0.15 gpm.

to W3F1 -2012-0099 Page 5 of 6 Level 3 - One unidentified RCS inventory balance value greater than 0.3 gpm.

Note: Calculation of the absolute RCS inventory balance values must include the rules for the treatment of negative values and missing observations.

1. Action levels on the deviation from the baseline mean:

Level 1 - Nine consecutive unidentified RCS inventory balance values greater than the baseline mean [-] value.

Level 2 - Two of three consecutive unidentified RCS inventory balance values greater than [~ + 20], where 0 is the baseline standard deviation.

Level 3 - One unidentified RCS inventory balance value greater than [- +30].

These action levels have been incorporated into Waterford Steam Electric Station Unit 3 operating procedures. The enhanced leak detection capability provides an increased level of safety that if a flaw were to grow through wall, although unlikely, that it would be detected prior to it growing to a safety significant size.

Based on the "best effort" 100% examination volume coverage of weld 08-007 using a qualified technique that just fell out of the acceptable parameters for use, the likelihood that a qualified PDI procedure will support that there are no flaws in the susceptible material, and the existing sensitive leak detection methodology, the proposed alternative provides an acceptable level of quality and safety for identifying degradation from PWSCC prior to a safety significant flaw developing.

6. Duration of Proposed Alternative The duration of the proposed alternative for Weld 08-007 is until prior to startup following the next WF3 refueling outage planned for the Spring 2014.
7. Precedent There were no precedents identified for this alternative request.
8. References
1. Material Reliability Program, Alloy 82/182 Pipe Butt Weld Safety Assessment for US PWR Plant Designs (MRP-1 09): Westinghouse and CE Design Plants, EPRI, Palo Alto, CA: 2005.1009804.
2. "Changing the Frequency of Inspections for PWSCC Susceptible Welds at Cold Leg Temperature," in Proceedings of PVP2011 ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference (PVP2011-57829), July 17-21, 2011, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

to W3F1 -2012-0099 Page 6 of 6

3. WCAP-1 6423-NP, Rev. 0, "Pressurized Water Reactor Owners Group Standard Process and Methods for Calculating RCS Leak Rate for Pressurized Water Reactors,"

Westinghouse Electric Co., September 2006.-

4. WCAP-16465-NP, Rev. 0, "Pressurized Water Reactor Owners Group Standard RCS Leakage Action Levels and Response Guidelines for Pressurized Water Reactors,"

Westinghouse Electric Co., September 2006.

Attachment 2 to W3F1-2012-0099 Weld 08-007 Examination Report: Refueling Outage 18 (This attachment contains 22 pages.)

  • Entergy Ultrasonic Examination Site/Unit: W3 I 3 Procedure: URS-UT-PA-DMW-1 Outage No.: RF-18-ISI Summary No.: W3.R1.11.0002 Procedure Rev.: 2 Report No,: ISI-VE-12-001 Workscope: IS' Work Order No.: 284096 Page: 1 of I Code: ASME Sec XI, 2001 Ed w/03 Add Cat./Item: R-A/R1.11 Location: LOOP IA Drawing No.: E-3029-LW3-RC-17

Description:

2" CHARGING NOZZLE TO SAFE-END WELD System ID: CH Component ID: 08-007 Size/Length: 2 in. Thickness/Diameter: N/A Limitations: None Comments:

Manual Phased Array Examination performed by URS-WGI.

Code Case N-770-1 Baseline Examination.

Vendor report URS-PADM-08-007 is attached.

Results: Accept v Reject Info N/A Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%: Yes - 100% Reviewed Previous Data: N/A Examiner Level Signature Date Reviewer Signature Date Briley, Jr., Robert E. (Signature on URS report 11/17/2012 N/A Examiner Level Signature Date Site Review Signature Date Briley, Jordon M. (Signature on URS report) 11/17/2012 Briley, Mike (Signature on URS report) 11/1712012 Other Level NIA Signature Date ANII Review Signature Date NIA Melder, Alan (Signature on URS report) 11/17/2012 Vendor Examination For LIT

URS EXAMINATION

SUMMARY

SHEET REPORT NO.: URS-PADM-08-007 Site: Waterford 3 Component ID: 08-007 Outage: RF18

Description:

RCP IA - 2" Charging Nozzle System: CH ASME Cat.: R-A ASME Item: R1.l1 Aug. Req.: N-770-1 2" Charging Nozzle - 18 Taper Scan GEIT Search GEIT OMNlscan Contour Wave Probe Approx. Measured  %

Direction Unit Wedge Setup File Dia. Mode Angles Focus Notch Angle TheoreticaMP() MP Db FSH Axial 115 D54 360- ANO 545 321 7.0S Long 25'-80' 1.25' SDH 50 1.555 1.559 38.4 83.0 LKDNT 152-321 LONG.ops 2° 80° 1 10Log Axial 360- ANO 545 321 70" Shear 25°-65° 1.25" SDH 500 1.555 1.570 39.3 79.5 LKDNT _________ 152-321 SHEAR.ops TO_ 1' Axial 115-00-485 360- ANO 485 331 2 . 50 LKDNT 152-331 LONG.ops 4.0 Long 250-80 1.25 6 1.589 1.589 41.0 80.1 Axial 115-00-485 360- ANO 465 331 4.0" Shear 25°-65° 1.25' 6 30' 1.179 1.178 41.0 82.2 LKUPT 152-331 SHEAR.ops Axial 115-000-485 360- ANO 485 331 40' Long 25- 1.25- 6 30' 1.179 1.180 41.0 87.2 LKUPT 152-331 LONG.ops I Axial 115-0-545 360- ANO 545 325 5.5" Long 25- 125- 8 50' 1.881 1.882 41.0 82.6 LKDNT 152-325 LONG.ops 5 Ln 5 8" 2 81 1 2 1 2 Axial 115-000-545 360- ANO 545 325 5.5' Shear 25' - 65' 1.25' 8 50' 1.881 1.880 25.0 81.4 LKDNT 152-325 SHEAR.ops CIRC 154DD485 360- ANO 485 430 4.0' Long 0'- 70' 1.25' 5 25' 1.278 1.276 37.2 80.2 CIR 15.0048 152-430 LONG.ops CIRC 115-00045 360- ANO 485 430 4,' Shear 25' - 65' 125" 5 25' 1.278 1.278 45.3 86.8 152-430 SHEARops _ I_ I CIRC 15M-485 360- ANO 485 432 4.0' Long 0"-70' 1.25' 5 25' 1.278 1.278 46.0 84.2 152-432 LONG.ops CIRC 115-000-485 152-432 AN 485o 432 4.0 Shear 25' - 65° 125' 5 25' 1.278 1.279 46.0 85.0 152-432 SHEAR.ops I___

CIRC 115-000-485 5360- ANO485o410 6.25' Long 0° -700 1.25' 7 25' 1.571 1.592 29.9 80.6 152.410 LONG~ops___

CIRC 115-485 360- AN0485410 6.25' Shear 25' - 65' 1.25' 7 25' 1.571 1.566 40.5 79.1 152-410 SHEAR.ops CIRC 115-000-485 360- ANO 485 412 6.25' Long 0--70' 1.25' 25' 1.571 1.551 251 830 152-412 LONG.ops 6 L 0 " 1 7 57 1 1 6 8 CIR1 5-00-4rý 360. ANO 485 4127 25 CIRC 115-000-405 380-412 HAR0o 6.25' Shear 25' -65° 1.25' 7 25' 1.571 1.587 42.7 84.5 152.412 1SHEARops I__I Examination Results:

The thickness and tapers associated with this component did not fall within qualified parameters of the EPRI Procedure, 1016645 for manual Phased Array UT of DM Welds. This exam was performed as a best effort utilizing the qualified techniques for similar nozzle configurations.

During the examination of the above referenced weld, no indications associated with PWSCC were recorded.

0 Examinations fbr the detection of circumferential flaws were performed utilizing a manual raster patterns and phased array focal laws in ranges from W and 25' to 70' and 80' respectively. These examinations were performed from both the upstream and downstream sides of the DM weld. Inside surface geometry, acoustic interface, non relevant indications, beam re-direct and embedded reflectors were seen but at below recordable amplitudes. 100% of the code required exam volume was ensonified in both directions.

Examinations for the detection of axially oriented flaws were performed utilizing manual raster patterns and focal laws and phased array focal laws in a range from 25' to 65'. These examinations were performed in both the clockwise and counterclockwise directions on the upstream and downstream sides of the weld. Inside surface geometry, embedded reflectors and non-relevant indications were seen but at below recordable amplitudes. 100% of the code required exam volume was ensonified in both directions.

Surface conditioning was performed prior to examination to meet procedural, ground flush requirements allowing for continuous scanning and access to the nozzle ID without loss of contact First UT exam, no previous data available for review. CRV Coverage (_>90%): 0 Yes  % C- No _  % See results summa'y These examinations were performed under Work Order. 28409 Examination Results: Acceptable 0 Rejectable 0 See results summary This Summary and the following data sheets have been reviewed and accepted by the following personnel:

,Prepared By Level /Date: //7-/

I M Page ý.of -I ULTRASONIC PHASED ARRAY CALIBRA TION/EXAMINA TION RECORD Sample: Charging Noz.08-007 Calibration Data Sheet: P A6 - Pd ,4 -oY -&a7 Plant/Unit: WF/3 Procedure No: URS-UT-PA-DMW-! REV. 2 Wedge Comments:

Manufacturer: GEIT See attached jpeg Report Print-Out For Instrument Settings Model: 360-152-321 See Table 1 for wedge and transducer essential parameters Contour Diameter: 7.0" Scan Direction: Axial CRV Coverage 0 Exit Point Location: 0.90" C oeg ): Ys No /A %

Zero

Reference:

Front of Probe Examination Results: -Acce tablq Rejectable Instrument Transducer Manufacturer: Olympus Manufacturer: GEIT Model: OmniScan-MX Model: 115-000-545 Serial Number: OMNI-102251 Serial Number: OIW17P Software Revision: OmniScan 2.OR 18 See Table I for transducer essential parameters Instrument Settings: See HTM Report Transducer Intezral Cable Instrument Settings not found on .jpg report form: Type: See cable diagram Length: See cable diagram Connector Type: See cable diagram Number of Inactive Elements: Transmit: Receive:

Calibration Data Files Focal Law File: 545 321 LONG.law Angles Generated (Circle): L5 - 800 (Longitudinal) Or 25- 65 ° (Shear)

Wave Mode (Circle): ILongitudinal Or Shear Focal Sound Path (Circle): 0.75" 1.00" 1.25'1 2.00" 3.00" 5.25" Set-up File: ANO 545 321 LONG.ops Calibration Reflector Data Calibration Block ED: 6" OD-AX-03 Couplant: 6(!r, b e *,0***'

/:'r.

Calbr3*e*efecorAngle  % FSH Ref. Sensitivity UT Response Loc~tion (Circle)

Notch (SH I" R~adius 50 83 38.4 /.DOOI joe-l7a et Reflcto~ept: Tue M MesurtV  % Error (Angle Verification-Circ or Ax Scans) 1.551559 0.004 Displayed Angle Measured Angle  % Error SiuatrRflcoAngle_!ý %FSH Ref. Sensitivity UT Response Locto (Circle)

Notch SDH (Rdis .... a De 50 182.6 38.4/Det Calibration Performed E m ier . Level Date - Time Initial: Robert E. Briley Jr. SL.,-II 1' 11/9/12 @ 0910 Intermediate: Jordon M. Briley 11 11/9/12 @ 1539 Final: Robert E. Briley Jr. fT 1. 11/9/12@ 1922 DeII Entergy Review:

ANII Review: N/A

"idi b!lW ýIAD Page3 of"J ULTRASONIC PHASED ARRAY CALIBRATION/EXAMINATION RECORD Sample: Chargin Noz.08-007 Calibration Data Sheet: 6'-'oS- PW b4 - o 9- ov7 ]

Plant/Unit: WF/3 Procedure No: URS-UT-PA-DMW-1 REV. 2 Wedge Comments:

Manufacturer: GEIT See attached .jpeg Report Print-Out For Instrument Settings Model: 360-152-321 See Table 1 for wedge and transducer essential parameters Contour Diameter: 7.0" Scan Direction: Axial RV Coverage (> 90%):/o No Exit Point Location: 0.90" ( OC No / -%

Zero

Reference:

Front of Proe Examination Results: <'Acceptable , Rejectable Instrument Transducer Manufacturer: Olympus Manufacturer: GEIT Model: OmniScan-MX Model: I15-000-545 Serial Number: OMNI-102251 Serial Number: OIW17P Software Revision: OmniScan 2.0R18 See Table 1 for transducer essential parameters Instrument Settings: See HTM Report Transducer Inte zal Cable Instrument Settings not found on jpg report form: Type: See cable diagram Length: See cable diagram Connector Type: See cable diagram Number of Inactive Elements: Transmit: Receive:

Calibration Data Files Focal Law File: 545 321 SHEAR.law Angles Generated (Circle): 25 - 800 (Longitudinal) Or t5- 65

  • Shear Wave Mode (Circle): Longitudinal Or hSbear Focal Sound Path (Circle): 0.75" i1.00I" 11.25'1 2.00" 3.00" 5.25" Set-up File: ANO 545 321 SHEAR.ops Calibration Reflector Data Calibration Block ID: 6" OD-AX-03 ___, Coup__nt: 1A _ 1Z,.T

% FSH Ref. Sensitivity UT Response Loation (Circle)

Calibraion eforAnle Notch 1"DD R~adius 50 79.5 39.3 0/ rea ah Depth (Angle Verification-CFr or Ax i ScaRno r1 1re //12 Dislayed Angle Measured Angle %Error M50 Initiafl:ct 50 0 r ortBieJ. II 119120 Rflte-.,

Siulto Angle % FSH Ref. Sensitivity UT Response Location (Circle)

Notch SDH termDe nle dite:

Rais)1" M.

50 102 Tordo Meriure MI11912413Depth Calibration Performed

  • m~/r 'Level Date - Time Initial: Robert E. Briley Jr.*,, ,,-1 . I 11/9/12 @ 0914 Intermediate: Jordon M. Briley . ] *I 11.,**/*, 11/9/12 C 1534 Final: Robert E. Briley Jri/o* , * ' I11) 11/9/12 @6 1926 Date Entergy Review: IIl Yi 3Z 7/Z ANII Review: 9 7 C N/A 1 7 41 1

URS Page 9 of ý (

fTI'1'DA C'flAfff DEYA C'17 A DDA V -A I hiD A TrflA / 1'YA "YIsA TAIV. V17d-n~n LJL..IIAII#JL'J ~AL' J 1A./~JJ.~A 1RALUI.f3 A ~ RA~AA~AI.d3 £ A~.'4 V , ~~4J~AA4 VIR A AV.,~V ~

Sample: I Charging Noz.08-007 Calibration Data Sheet: '5 - 'b*d - oi- go 7 Plant/Unit: WF/3 Procedure No: URS-UT-PA-DMW- I REV.2 Wedge Comments:

Manufacturer: GEIT See attached .jpeg Report Print-Out For Instrument Settings Model: 360-152-325 See Table 1 for wedge and transducer essential parameters Contour Diameter: 5.5" Scan Direction:Scaniretio: Axial AialCRy Coverage (_> 90% =L C-/o No o Exit Point Location: 0.90" Caiaonv esults:O% *QY l N Zero

Reference:

Front of Probe Examination Results: (Acceptable Rejectable Instrument Transducer Manufacturer: Olympus Manufacturer: GEIT Model: OmniScan-MX Model: 115-000-545 Serial Number: OMNI-102251 Serial Number: OIW17P Software Revision: OmniScan 2.ORI 8 See Table I for transducer essential parameters Instrument Settings: See HTM Report Transducer Integtral Cable Instrument Settings not found on .jpg report form: Type: See cable diagram Length: See cable diagram Connector Type: See cable diagram Number of Inactive Elements: Transmit: Receive:

Calibration Data Files Focal Law File: 545 325 LONG.law Angles Generated (Circle): 5 - 80' Longitudinal Or 25- 65 ' (Shear)

Wave Mode (Circle): sonitudina Or Shear Focal Sound Path (Circle): 0.75" 1 L.o00" I 1.25' 2.00" 3.00" 5.25" Set-up File: ANO 545 325 LONG .ops Calibration Reflector Data Calibration Block ID: 2.8-5.4-14DG-304SS- I Couplant:6k. jrqe/_ e [ A fe.4:"p-?Z z Anglel%FSH Ref.Sensitivity UT Response Lbiation I (Circle)

Calibration Reflector 8 SDH Radius 50 82.6 41 ,P ]

  • Ke.a Depth (Angle Verification-Circ or Ax Scans)1.11.2001 Displayed Angle Measured Angle  % Error 50 1 50 0 RflctrAngle Siulto  % FSH Ref. Sensitivity UT Response Location (Circle)

Noth Radius 50 80.6 35.2 (

(f a a) et Calibration Performed Kxamil, Level Date - Time Initial: Robert E. Briley Jr. II 11/9/12 @ 0801 Intermediate: Jordon M. Briley 11 11/9/12@,1545 Final: RobertE. Briley Jr. II 11/9/12@b 1832

_,:7 /Date Enterg Review: III II9Z1i~.I ANU Review: N/A )

URNs Page,. of *I IBRA TION / EXAMINATION RECORD ISample: ICharging Noz.08-007 ICalibration Data Sheetl: Iu Z S - Ao o94

- o7 Plant/Unit: WF/3 Procedure No: URS-UT-PA-DMW-1 REV. 2 Wedge Comments:

Manufacturer: GEIT See attached .jpeg Report Print-Out For Instrument Settings Model: 360-152-325 See Table 1 for wedge and transducer essential parameters Contour Diameter: 5.5" Scan Direction: Axial Exit Point Location: 0.90" CRV Coverage (> 90%):QYes .Lj_% No  %

ZEro

Reference:

Zero Rfrntocet: Front of Front ofProExamination Probe Results: *--*_

-AKcceptablZ Rejectable Instrument Transducer Manufacturer: Olympus Manufacturer: GEIT Model: OmniScan-MX Model: 115-000-545 Serial Number: OMNI-102251 Serial Number: OIW17P Software Revision: OmniScan 2.OR18 See Table 1 for transducer essential parameters Instrument Settings: I See HTM Report Transducer Int rat Cable Instrument Settings not found on .jpg report form: Type: See cable diagram Length: See cable diagram Connector Type: See cable diagram Number of Inactive Elements: Transmit: Receive:

Calibration Data Files Focal Law File: 545 325 SHEAR.law Angles Generated (Circle): 0 - 70' (Longitudinal) Or V5- 65 0 Shear Wave Mode (Circle): Longitudinal Or hea Focal Sound Path (Circle): 0.75" 1.00" 1.25' 2.00" 3.00" 5.25" Set-up File: ANO 545 325 SHEAR.ops Calibration Reflector Data Calibration Block 1D: 2.8-5.4-14DG-304SS-1 Couplant:(A/i, I Ae

, Sr *,(':

fU, "ozzS Angle 1% FSHI Ref. Sensitivity UT Response Lodltion I (Circle)

  • -,Calibration Reflector

%I z 8 SDH Radius 50 81.4 25 A70 e Depth Reflector Depth: */16" True MP MaueMP %Error (Angle Verification-Circ or Ax Scans)0.1 Displayed Angle Measured Angle %Error SiualrRelctrAngle  % FSH Ref. Sensitivity UT Response Location (Circle)

Notch rSH- I" Radius 50 8426 / Depth Calibration Performed Axn [ner. Level Date - Time Initial: Robert E. Briley Jr. II 11/9/12 @ 0805 Intermediate: Jordon M. Briley H. 11/9/12@ 1552 Final: Robert E. Briley J ,, II 11/9/12 @ 1834 Date Enter Review: III ANII Review: N/A

i 11j 0 Page 6 of - I ULTRASONIC PHASED ARRAY CALIBRA TION/EXAMINA TION RECORD Sample: Charging Noz.08-007 Calibration Data Sheet: &,of5- PAdO - ag- oo7 PlantlUnit: WF/3 Procedure No: URS-UT-PA-DMW-1 REV. 2 Wedge Comments:

Manufacturer: GEIT See attached .jpeg Report Print-Out For Instrument Settings Model: 360-152-331 See Table I for wedge and transducer essential parameters Contour Diameter: 4.0" Scan Direction: Axial Exit Point Location: 0.90" CRV Coverage (Ž>90%): Yes  % No kA %

Zero

Reference:

Front of Probe Examination Results: , iuepta:ble> Rejectable Instrument Transducer Manufacturer: Olympus Manufacturer: GEIT Model: OmniScan-MX Model: 115-000-485 Serial Number: OMNI-102251 Serial Number: 023JYV Software Revision: OmniScan 2.0R118 See Table I for transducer essential parameters Instrument Settings: See HTM Report Transducer Inte ral Cable Instrument Settings not found on .jpg report form: Type: See cable diagram Length: See cable diagram Connector Type: See cable diagram Number of Inactive Elements: Transmit: Receive:

Calibration Data Files Focal Law File: 485 331 LONG.law Angles Generated (Circle): 5 - 800 Longitudinal Or 25- 65 ° (Shear)

Wave Mode (Circle): /ongitudinal Or Shear Focal Sound Path (Circle): 0.75" 1 1.00" 1.-25'1 2.00" 3.00" 5.25" Set-up File: ANO 485 331 LONG.ops Calibration Reflector Data Calibration Block ID: 2.8-5.4-14DG-304SS-1 Couplant: 4A * * . :?:*,a., z*r S,

UT Response Lo8ation (Circle) anRtol Angle % FSH Ref. Sensitivity Nth 6 SDH Radius 50 80 41 . 7 Depth (Angle Verification-Circ or Ax Scans)l l  !.589 1.589 0.00 Measured Angle  % Error D0isplayed Angle albanRfnl:cRo SmrAngle ber.rl r ~Re.Sniiiy

% FnSH '- UT Response Location I l91@13(Circle)

Notch Sim*Reflector

  • " Radius 50 88.1 41 / E5 Depthi Calibration Performed /f*xamiunie .*r,. " Level Date - Time Initial: Robert E. Briley Jr.!(' 7 /* I11'_ 11/9/12 @0810 Intermediate: Jordon M. Briley ... *) , I11/3)-,*' 11/9/12 @ 1602 Final: Robert E. Briley Jr.[  !(.* ,c /, 11 11/9/12 @ 1837

,/r

... I . ,,. D ale Entergy Review: fzz:-'-*' /// Z*-n?

AI, ANH Review: aWN/A /" "'2

lij t d Page I of ý- I ULTRASONIC PHASED ARRAY CALIBRATION! EXAMINATION RECORD Sample: I Charging Noz.08-007 Calibration Data Sheet: AX S - P9404 - of - oo 7 Plant/Unit: WF/3 Procedure No: URS-UT-PA-DMW-I REV. 2 Wedge Comments:

Manufacturer: GEIT See attached .jpeg Report Print-Out For Instrument Settings Model: 360-152-331 See Table I for wedge and transducer essential parameters Contour Diameter: 4.0" Scan Direction: Axial ):( Y 1  % No--L--

Exit Point Location: 0.90" RV Coverage ( >-90%  % No _L._%

Zero

Reference:

Front of Probe Examination Results: cceptab Rejectable Instrument Transducer Manufacturer: Olympus Manufacturer: GEIT Model: OmniScan-MX Model: 115-000-485 Serial Number: OMNI-102251 Serial Number: 023JYV Software Revision: OmniScan 2.OR18 See Table I for transducer essential parameters Instrument Settings: See HTM Report Transducer Inte Yral Cable Instrument Settings not found on ,jpgreport form: Type: See cable diagram Length: See cable diagram Connector Type: See cable diagram Number of Inactive Elements: Transmit: Receive:

Calibration Data Files Focal Law File: 485 331 LONG.law Angles Generated (Circle): 25 - 80° (Longitudinal Or 25- 65 0 (Shear)

Wave Mode (Circle): Longitudinal Or Shear Focal Sound Path (Circle): 0.75" 1.00" 1.25' 2.00" 3.00" 5.25" Set-up File: ANO 485 331 LONG.ops Calibration Block ID: 2.8-5.4-14DG-304SS- I Calibration Reflector DataCouplant: bt4A I id - Z Calibration Reflector Angle % FSH Ref. Sensitivity UT Response Lodation (Circle) 6 SDH R~adius 30 87.8 41 . ,,etal T,, Pa Depth Displayed Angle Measured Angle ~a% Error Depth Calibration Performed xSnmiaer. Level Date - Time Initial: RobertE.tBriley Jr.! 11/9/12@0810 Intermediate: Jordon M. BrileyII 11/9/12 @ 1602 Final: Robert E. Briley Jr. . 11/9/12 @ 183*7 It e2tDate Enter Review: 1II -11/9/1at 183 ANII Review: I AV& N/A

U m Page ý of '"k ULTRASONIC PHASED ARRAY CALIBRATION! EXAMINATION RECORD Sample: I Charging Noz.08-007 Calibration Data Sheet: AX 5 - Pdt~I' - O - o I7 Plant/Unit: WF/3 Procedure No: UJRS-UT-PA-DMW-1 REV. 2 Wedge Comments:

Manufacturer: GEIT See attached .jpeg Report Print-Out For Instrument Settings Model: 360-152-331 See Table I for wedge and transducer essential parameters Contour Diameter: 4.0" Scan Direction: Axial RV Coverage (> 90%): -1Nj° Exit Point Location: 0.90" CR Coerg (9%) (2 ".#% No jj~ %

Zero

Reference:

Front of Probe Examination Results: c eptable Rejectable Instrument Transducer Manufacturer: Olympus Manufacturer: GEIT Model: OmniScan-MX Model: 115-000-485 Serial Number: OMNI- 102251 Serial Number: 023JYV Software Revision: OmniScan 2.ORI18 See Table 1 for transducer essential parameters Instrument Settings: See HTM Report Transducer Inte Zral Cable Instrument Settings not found on .jpg report form: Type: See cable diagram Length: See cable diagram Connector Type: See cable diagram Number of Inactive Elements: Transmit: Receive:

Calibration Data Files Focal Law File: 485 331 SHEAR.law Angles Generated (Circle): 0 - 70* (Longitudinal) Or 5- 65 0 (Shear Wave Mode (Circle): Longitudinal Or IShear Focal Sound Path (Circle): 0.75" 1.00" 1.25' 2.00" 3.00" 5.25" Set-up File: ANO 485 331 SHEAR.ops Calibration Reflector Data Calibration Block ID: 2.8-5.4-14DG-304SS-1I Couplant:g/tier, (,g

., &4A'  : 0 -*z S Caliration RfetrAngle  % FSH Ref. Sensitivity UT Response Likation 1 Crce 6 SDH Radius 30 87.8 41 /tal P Depth Reflector Depth:

erformeasured Le MP e ETror (Angle Verificaion-Circ or Ax Scans) M. I Displayed Angle Measured Ang-le %Error 30 30 0 efecorAngle Siulqtr  % FSH Ref. Sensitivity UT Response Location (Circle)

Notch 1y

" Radius 45 72.4 29 1 ( Meta*`~-tiý Depth Calibration Performed ftaminter:,, Level Date - Time Iiil RoetE. Briley Jr., ý(+C,- * -"* I11: 11/9/12 @ 0819 Intermediate: Jordon M. Briley - J 11 11/9/12 @ 1615 Final: Robert E. Briley Jr. w - II 11/9/12 @ 1844 Entergy Review:II ANIIReview: [ ** /t"N/A '*/r1

URSj Page I of ýA ULTRASONIC PHASED ARRAY CALIBRATION/EXAMINATION RECORD Sample: I Charging Noz.08-007 Calibration Data Sheet: I A$S - A4 -,0 g -00,7 Plant/Unit: WF/3 Procedure No: URS-UT-PA-DMW-I REV. 2 Wedge Comments:

Manufacturer: GEIT See attached .jpeg Report Print-Out For Instrument Settings Model: 360-152-430 See Table 1 for wedge and transducer essential parameters Contour Diameter: 4.0" Scan Direction: Circumferential No 21%

Exit Point Location: 0.90" CRV Coverage (_> 90%): s 1(1(% No Zero

Reference:

Front of Probe Examination Results: ,

bceptableRejectable Instrument Transducer Manufacturer: Olympus Manufacturer: GEIT Model: OmniScan-MX Model: 115-000-485 Serial Number: OMNI- 102251 Serial Number: 023JYV Software Revision: OmniScan 2.ORI 8 See Table I for transducer essential parameters Instrument Settings: See HTM Report Transducer Into Yral Cable Instrument Settings not found on .jpg report form: Type: See cable diagram Length: See cable diagram Connector Type: See cable diagram Number of Inactive Elements: Transmit: Receive:

Calibration Data Files Focal Law File: 485 430 LONG.law Angles Generated (Circle): 1 - 70* (Longitudinal) I Or 25- 65 0 (Shear)

Wave Mode (Circle): ILongitudinal r Shear Focal Sound Path (Circle): 0.75" 1.00" 11.25'1 2.00" 3.00" 5.25" Set-up File: ANO 485 430 LONG.ops Calibration Reflector Data Calibration Block ID: 2.8-5.4-14DG-304SS-1 Couplant: I.A /', e.[. *,%t , .LA 01 ZZ. s Calibration Reflector Angle  % FSH Ref, Sensitivity UT Response, Lo. tion (ice 5 SDH Radius 25 80.2 37.2 ] "?Pa eta eaPa DepthDet h Displayed Angle 2525 0 RflctrAngle Siulto  % FSH Ref, Sensitivity UT Response Location (Circle)

(* 5 SDH Radius 2 8037 ]. - F M

  • Dept etal Path Depth Calibration Performed n Exa np Level Date - Time Initial: Robert E. Briley Jr. 4 II 1/9/12@0823 Intermediate: Jordon M. Briley II 11/9/12 @ 1620 Final: Robert E. Briley Jr, 11 11/9/12@1847 DeII Entergy Review:

ANII Review; N/A I [-/ 12

I M Page ILbof ¥s[

ULTRASONIC PHASED ARRAY CALIBRATION/EXAMINATION RECORD Sample: I Charging Noz.08-007 Calibration Data Sheet: I g S5- P dbM - oa- 0o7 Plant/Unit: WF/3 Procedure No: URS-UT-PA-DMW-1 REV. 2 Wedge Comments:

Manufacturer: GEIT See attached .jpeg Report Print-Out For Instrument Settings Model: 360-152-430 See Table 1 for wedge and transducer essential parameters Contour Diameter: 4.0" Scan Direction: Circumferential Exit Point Location: 0.90" CRV Coverage (> 90%): !Yes  % No ' N%

Zero

Reference:

Front of Probe Examination Results: ,Aýc'ptable Rejectable Instrument Transducer Manufacturer: Olympus Manufacturer: GEIT Model: OmniScan-MX Model: 115-000-485 Serial Number: OMNI-102251 Serial Number: 023JYV Software Revision: OmniScan 2.ORl18 See Table 1 for transducer essential parameters Instrument Settings: See HTM Report Transducer Inte gral Cable Instrument Settings not found on .jpg report form: Type: See cable diagram Length: See cable diagram Connector Type: See cable diagram Number of Inactive Elements: Transmit: Receive:

Calibration Data Files Focal Law File: 485 430 SHEAR.law Angles Generated (Circle): 0 - 70° (Longitudinal) Or V5 (Shear Wave Mode (Circle): Longitudinal OrShea*

Focal Sound Path (Circle): 0.75" 1.00" 1 11.25'1 2.00" 3.00" 5.25" Set-up File: ANO 485 430 SHEAR.ops Calibration Reflector Data Calibration Block ID: 2.8-5.4-14DG-304SS-1I Couplant: */r *_ t(.Oyzz 5"

  • Calibration RfetrAngle I% FSH IRef. Sensitivity UT Response LokAtion (Circle) 5 SDH Radius 25 86.2 45.3 /. /Zt Pa Depth (Angle Verification-Cite or A~x Scans) 1.278 1.276 0.002 DislaydlAgleMesurdfAgletorr Siua~ fetrAngle  % FSH. RefSestvy UT Response Location (Circle)

Notch _ 25 _Radius 6.2 45. Path) Depth Calibration Performed - Examinwr Level Date - Time Initial: Robert E. Briley Jr. Ic. - II 11/9/12@0856 Intermediate: JordonM. Briley ','I I11 11/9/12 @,1702 Final: RobertE. Briley Jr*. *L' . L., ,, II 11/9/12@ 1913 Date Entergy Review: I'II /,* /,

ANII Review: A N/! 11Y7_0 I

U M. Page lof ,

ULTRASONIC PHASED ARRAY CALIBRATION/EXAMINATION RECORD Sample: Charging Noz.08-007 Calibration Data Sheet: t S'- P'WOA4 - o 97- op 7 Plant/Unit: WF/3 Procedure No: URS-UT-PA-DMW-1 REV. 2 Wedge Comments:

Manufacturer: GEIT See attached .jpeg Report Print-Out For Instrument Settings Model: 360-152-432 See Table I for wedge and transducer essential parameters Contour Diameter: 4.0" Scan Direction: Circumferential C Exit Point Location: 0.90" CRV o ( _  %

Zero

Reference:

Front of Probe Examination Results: PCceptable. Rejectable Instrument Transducer Manufacturer: Olympus Manufacturer: GEIT Model: OmniScan-MX Model: 115-000-485 Serial Number: OMfN-102251 Serial Number: 023JYV Software Revision: OmniScan 2.ORI18 See Table I for transducer essential parameters Instrument Settings: See HTM Report Transducer lnt ral Cable Instrument Settings not found on .jpg report form: Type: See cable diagram Length: See cable diagram Connector Type: See cable diagram Number of Inactive Elements: Transmit: Receive:

Calibration Data Files Focal Law File: 485 432 LONG.law Angles Generated (Circle): 0 - 700 (Longitudinal) Or 25- 65 o (Shear)

Wave Mode (Circle): Longitudinal r Shear Focal Sound Path (Circle): 0.75" 1.00" 1.25' 2.00" 3.00" 5.25" Set-up File: ANO 485 432 LONG.ops Calibration Reflector Data Calibration Block ED: 2.8-5.4-14DG-304SS-1I Couplant: (A*,,,.* " az ate z.

__Calibration Reflector Angle I% FSH IRef. Sensitivity_ UT Response Lotation I (Circle)

(Angle Verification-Circ or Ax Scans) 1.178 1.279 0.001 Displayed Angle Measured Angle  % Error 25 25 0 Age% FSH Ref "es UT Response Location (Circle)

Simula Reflector 4 i --

Notch (SDfjlD.6" Radius 81321 . fa Depth Calibration Performed xamnr, <, Level Date - Time Initial: Robert E. Briley Jr.! II 11/9/12 @ 0833 Intermediate: JordonM. Briley 1I 11/9/12@ 1631 Final: Robert E. Briley Jr.- II 11/9/12 @ 1854

-,;, -,oDatt Entergy Review: 4 .j III //,/ 1*,7 ANn Review: f d'4c:*/Vk/] N/A It-. -?/-' / -

V M Page 1kf*2 ULTRASONIC PHASED ARRAY CALIBRA TION/EXAMINA TION RECORD Sample: Charging Noz.08-007 Calibration Data Sheet: MA - jP-4*41 -,Y oo 7 Plant/Unit: WF/3 Procedure No: URS-UT-PA-DMW-1 REV. 2 Wedge Comments:

Manufacturer: GEIT See attached .jpeg Report Print-Out For Instrument Settings Model: 360-152-432 See Table I for wedge and transducer essential parameters Contour Diameter: 4.0" Scan Direction: Circumferential Exit Point Location: 0.90" CRy Coverage (sul%): go%)c.Y NoReet-Zero

Reference:

Front of Probe Examination Results: ,ccetable Rejectable Instrument Transducer Manufacturer: Olympus Manufacturer: GEIT Model: OmniScan-MX Model: 115-000-485 Serial Number: OMNI-102251 Serial Number: 023JYV Software Revision: OmniScan 2.0R18 See Table 1 for transducer essential parameters Instrument Settings:I See HTM Report Transducer Inte [ral Cable Instrument Settings not found on .jpg report form: Type: See cable diagram Length: See cable diagram Connector Type: See cable diagram Number of Inactive Elements: Transmit: Receive:

Calibration Data Files Focal Law File: 485 432 SHEAR.law Angles Generated (Circle): 0 - 700 (Longitudinal) Or V5- 65 0 Shearr Wave Mode (Circle): Longitudinal Or head Focal Sound Path (Circle): 0.75" 1.00" 1.25' 2.00" 3.00" 5.25" Set-up File: ANO 485 432 SHEAR.ops Calibration Reflector Data Caibration Block ED: 2.8-5.4-14DG-304SS-1 Couplant: A*/7*4 e C &i%,

etal  : o yezpt Anele % FSH Ref. Sensitivity UT RespLnse LoDtion (Circle)

Calibration Reflector 25 r. 83 46 / I6 1ý 2 Depth 5 SDH t Radius (Angle Verification-Ci n Scans) or Ax E.278 1.279 0.001 Displayed Angle Measured Angle  % Error W"25 25 0 SmotRelco!Angle  % FSH Re.Sniiiy UT Response Location r (Circle)

Notch (o 0.6 Radius 38 94.3 37.3 07.6 * ý! Depth Calibration Performed A*xonua , *- Level Date - Time Initial: Robert E. Briley Jr. _01 ,) i 1I 11/9/12 @ 0838 Intermediate: Jordo M, Brle 11 11/9/12 @1638 Final: Robert E. Brfiley Jrltq (J iII 11/9/12 @1857 Date Entergy Review: [II ZZ 7"Dae/

ANII Review: N/A ff-[ "] 2

1R Pagel 3 of ULTRASONIC PHASED ARRAY CALIBRATION! EXAMINA TION RECORD Sample: Char in Noz.08-007 Calibration Data Sheet: 14K5- P bM-,o9-]o Plant/Unit: WF/3 Procedure No: URS-UT-PA-DMW-1 REV. 2 Wedge Comments:

Manufacturer: GEIT See attached .jpeg Report Print-Out For Instrument Settings Model: 360-152-410 See Table 1 for wedge and transducer essential parameters Contour Diameter: 6.25" Scan Direction: Circumferential C! No Exit Point Location: 0.90" CRaCveageon (esu : - ( ,cpa Zero

Reference:

Front of Probe Examination Results (cceptable Rejectable Instrument Transducer Manufacturer: Olympus Manufacturer: GEIT Model: OmniScan-MX Model: 115-000-485 Serial Number: OMNI-102251 Serial Number: 023JYV Software Revision: OmniScan 2.0R118 (See Table 1 for transducer essential parameters)

Instrument Settings: See HTM Report Transducer Integral Cable Instrument Settings not found on .jpg report form: Type: See cable diagram Length: See cable diagram Connector Type: See cable diagram Number of Inactive Elements: Transmit: Receive:

Calibration Data Files Focal Law File: 485 410 LONG.law Angles Generated (Circle): 10 - 70* (Long tudinal) Or 25- 65 0 (Shear)

Wave Mode (Circle): ngitudinal Vr Shear Focal Sound Path (Circle): 0.75" 1.00" 1.25' 2.00" 3.00" 5.25" Set-up File: ANO 485 410 LONG. ops Calibration Reflector Data Calibration Block ID: 2.8-5.4-14DG=-304SS-1 Couplant: eA [_z.r*. f'e.x " 07zz*

Calbrtin efecorAngle  % FSH Ref. Sensitivity UT Response Lodiation (circle)

(Cich 7 SDH Radius 25 83 26.1 ]a laijft* Depth (AgeVerficýfation-Circ or Ax Scans) 151.900,019 Displayed Angle Measured Angle  % Error 25 25 0 RflctrAngle Siulla  % FSH Ref. Sensitivity UT Response Location (Circle)

Notch 1Sj

" Radius 25 81.4 26.1l  ! Depth Calibration Performed. n Examjw Level Date - Time Initial: Robert E. Briley Jr.t < X.. - lI 11/9/12 @ 0842 Intermediate: Jordon M. Briley , -,Z II 11/9/12 @ 1642 Final: Robert E. Briley Jr.. '. 7 _ , II 11/9/12 @ 1900 Date, Enterl Review: III I 2 I I ANII Review: I 'IN/A 1 7ZJ

VJm Page l'of ý"

ULTRASONIC PHASED ARRAY CALIBRA TION/EXAMINA TION RECORD Sample: Charging Noz.08-007 Calibration Data Sheet: AA S- P,'bMl - o - O9 o -7 Plant/Unit: WF/3 Procedure No: URS-UT-PA-DMW-1 REV. 2 Wedge Comments:

Manufacturer: GEIT See attached .jpeg Report Print-Out For Instrument Settings Model: 360-152-410 See Table 1 for wedge and transducer essential parameters Contour Diameter: 6.25" Scan Direction: Circumferential Cv9  ; s Exit Point Location: 0.90" Zero

Reference:

Front of Probe Examination Results: (Xcceptable Rejectable Instrument Transducer Manufacturer: Olympus Manufacturer: GEIT Model: OmiScan-MX Model: 115-000-485 Serial Number: OMNI-102251 Serial Number: 023JYV Software Revision: OmniScan 2.0R 18 See Table I for transducer essential parameters Instrument Settings: See HTM Report Transducer Inte Yral Cable Instrument Settings not found on .jpg report form: Type: See cable diagram Length: See cable diagram Connector Type: See cable diagram Number of Inactive Elements: Transmit: Receive:

Calibration Data Files Focal Law File: 485 410 SHEAR.law Angles Generated (Circle): 0 - 70" (Longitudinal) Or V5- 65 0 (Shear]

Wave Mode (Circle): Longitudinal Or Shear Focal Sound Path (Circle): 0.75" 1.00" 11.25'1 2.00" 3.00" 5.25" Set-up File: ANO 485 410 SHEAR.ops Calibration Reflector Data Calibration Block ID: 2.8-5.4-14DG=304SS-1 Couplant: /*l, - .

(Circle) o 7 zz RelecorAngle Calbraio I%FSHI Ref. Sensitivity UT Response Loea~ion I

  • - 7 SDH Radius 25 84.5 42.7/. 7 ( Pt* Deh (Angle Verification-Circ or Ax Scans) l 1.587 0.016 Idsplayed Angle Measured Angre 1 1rror 25 25 0 Calibration P erforedctor eel Dt -Tm I% FSH Ref. Sensitivity UT Response Location (Circle)

SiuatrRelctrAngle Notch (S 1" Radius 25 82 42.77 1 jatlPt Depth Calibration Performed g-arigiier E -Level Date - Time Initial: Robert E. Briley Jr/**4.'*//A *, -*I 11,, 11/9/12 @ 0846 Intermediate: Jordon M. Briley / :I 11'* 11/9/12 @ 1647 Final: Robert E. Briley Jr.- II 11/9/12 @ 1904 5ý9 . Date, Entergy Review: -III ,, /z, ANH Review: k KK N/A if-/ 7ý/2_

URS CALIBRA TION /EXAMINA TION RECORD Page Ifof ý'I ULTRASONIC PHASED ARRA Y CAMBRA TIONIEXAMINA TION RECO" Sample: Charging Noz.08-007 Calibration Data Sheet: t, A - b0 PNI,- o A' - go 7 Plant/Unit: WF/3 Procedure No: URS-UT-PA-DMW-I REV. 2 Wedge Comments:

Manufacturer: GEIT See attached .jpeg Report Print-Out For Instrument Settings Model: 360-152-412 See Table 1 for wedge and transducer essential parameters Contour Diameter: 6.25" Scan Direction: Circumferential A Exit Point Location: 0.90" CRV Coverage (> 90%)(_Ye. ./( % No 0 Zero

Reference:

Front of Probe Examination Results: (-Aceptable Rejectable Instrument Transducer Manufacturer: Olympus Manufacturer: GEIT Model: OmniScan-MX Model: 115-000-485 Serial Number: OMNI-102251 Serial Number: 023JYV Software Revision: OmniScan 2.0R118 See Table 1 for transducer essential parameters Instrument Settings: See HTM Report Transducer Intezral Cable Instrument Settings not found on .jpg report form: Type: See cable diagram Length: See cable diagram Connector Type: See cable diagram 00 Number of Inactive Elements: Transmit: Receive:

Calibration Data Files Focal Law File: 485 412 SHEAR.law Angles Generated (Circle): 0 - 70' (Longitudinal) Or 125- 65 °/Shear Wave Mode (Circle): Longitudinal Or Iheal Focal Sound Path (Circle): 0.75" 1.00" 1 1.25'l 2.00" 3.00" 5.25" Set-up File: ANO 485 412 SHEAR. ops Calibration Reflector Data Calibration Block ID: 2.8-5.4-14DG=3048S-1 I% FSH IRef. Sensitivity Couplant: Mi UT Response LUkation

'.; L(Circle).

7-v-Aalibration RfetrAngle SDH Radius 25 79.1 40.5 j Depth (Angle Verification-Cier or Ax Scans) L.571 1.566 0.005 nolDisplayed Angle Measured Angle %Error 0 DEpthr M25 Reflcto Deth:ý Tue P Masu25 etd aMP Angle % FSH Ref. Sensitiit UT Response Location (Circle)

Simulgj# Refl~ector Notch rSD I" Radius 25ta 794 0.h Depth Calibration Performed 'AEa v _mg ,*ng .- Level Date - Time In itial: Ro be rt E . B riley Jr.i f -* " '* - '* . - x' 11,'~

I 1 1/9 /12 @ 0 8 5 6 Intermediate: Jordon M. Briley -.. ,] ]) I11'-*... 11/9/12 @ 1702 Final: Robert E. Briley Jr. ' . -, II 11/9/12 @ 1917

  • .. / L '  : *D a te Enteray Review: III ANn Review: N/A

ITD~

VI Pagel 6of tI ULTRASONIC PHASED ARRAY CALIBRA TION/EXAMINA TIONRECORD Sample: Charing Noz.08-007 Calibration Data Sheet: 99'S - ed9bof- of- o0 -

Plant/Unit: WF/3 Procedure No: URS-UT-PA-DMW-I REV. 2 Wedge Comments:

Manufacturer: GEIT See attached .jpeg Report Print-Out For Instrument Settings Model: 360-152-412 See Table 1 for wedge and transducer essential parameters Contour Diameter: 6.25" Scan Direction: Circumferential Exit Point Location:

Exit 0.90" PointEocamion:i090,e0uV1s: CRV Coverage (> 90%): Yes Y No(

Zero

Reference:

Front of Probe Examination Results: Accetbl Rejectable Instrument Transducer Manufacturer: Olympus Manufacturer: GEIT Model: OmniScan-MX Model: 115-000-485 Serial Number: OMNI-102251 Serial Number: 023JYV Software Revision: OmniScan 2.OR 18 See Table I for transducer essential parameters Instrument Settings: See HTM Report Transducer Inte ral Cable Instrument Settings not found on .jpg report form: Type: See cable diagram Length: See cable diagram Connector Type: See cable diagram Number of Inactive Elements: Transmit: Receive:

Calibration Data Files Focal Law File: 485 412 LONG. law Angles Generated (Circle): - 700 (Longitudinal)I Or 25- 65 0 (Shear)

Wave Mode (Circle): Lngit lr Shear Focal Sound Path (Circle): 0.75" 1.00" F11.25'1 2.00" 3.00" 5.25" Set-up File: ANO 485 412 LONG. ops Calibration Reflector Data Calibration Block ID: 2.8-5.4-14DG=304SS-1 (I htb, 7 SDH ReflectorRef.

Radius 2 806 29.9*/

Sensitivity_ '/ZL (___- te Time Depth Calibration Reflector Dept: J True MP Measured MP  % Error (Angle Verification-Circ or Ax Scans) 1.571Angle Displayed 1.592 Angle Measured %0.021 Error 25 25 0 Sensitivi UT Response Lcation (Circle) atrRef.

Notch I " Radius N9.9Aa Ma Depth Calibration Performed *-)Exaniaer,-- -- Level Date - Time Initial: Robert E. Briley Jr. ',- ,,-,

  • _( " 1I 11/9/12 @0852 Intermediate: Jordon M. Briley i* ,) -. ... l ) if 11/9/12 @1656 Fia:RobertE. Briley Jr.
  • ti* ** q, 11(f 11/9/12 @ 1908 Entergy ReviewT:n /* 7Z,4:,7* I'YII ANn Review: IN'A(efefn - N/A
  • Entery Ultrasonic Indication Report Site/Unit: WF/ 3 Procedure: U R,S- uF-PA-bMVI -I Outage No.: R F iq Summary No.: Procedure Rev.: z Report No.:

Workscope: Work Order No.: 7-W q(p. - C I Page: ]-i of Wo WIMM Search Unit Angle: [] Piping Welds C,L Wo Location:

  • Q Ferritic Vessels > 2"T IW1 W2 I n I nr~tinn" 5P~F Fl Other F T* L*T*

.J"AL UMJ

ý% 1, 1; ILO Ll 12 Comments:* NN- Ma.)( Wa-652. DOWN Tf P FR-DN CAPr' dc Tc' RUTF-iZ TNTE-PC-E. LP ZY7i"CCV{ F2-OrN\ TOP Indication  % W Forward Backward L1 L L2 RBR Remarks Angle No. Of Max Of Max . -_ Of Max -f Max Of Amp. Indication Type: S=Spot; L=Linear; M=Multiple; G=Geometry DAC W MP Wi MP W2 MP Max Max

  • o f i 37*z *( (.15" / A / I/ SPoT AT Cob(C *o ExamDner Level L, Date Reviewer Signature Date Examiner Level Signm*e Date Site Review lure Date Other Level Signature Date ANII Review 5"gnatyrq Date L_ f _ __41,,

_ I n4(/t1K- "/,(/(1-11"/-

Additional - UT Indication Data <edit from Setup>

[)N\W 08-007 WF-3 i /o 9/12-pai is6f ý-I INTER.ACE PUNcit MAKK NOZZLE 5AFEE rý I

Zr If EOAMI (AT[ONI P~.RFO~AA~t '~IN ONLy TI\TINCATWO'\

ZNI1 ccA wo t-L00 I .,SpOT,)e j t4C u PT-A 2-, £I bs.

Ff-RF INFaR FACE Trý TRE-F E3 LfT RF-7CoRDAtBLI (/3)

RFCMAILtC- )1LT CTh

ý*M/PI TDEýS015 5ELOW 0 AvZzI KG To 5CALE]

I ~/ //i-711

)

DM W 08-O°7 WF-3 po, 5ec J o /

ii 1 1it A

No Nz L *It I,£ SAFE~NJb CIRCUPMFER.E11C._s LOCATioN:

A - 73/4" NOZZ LE SlbE oF pIpF--- TO r*0ZZL_. aWI--Lb 2-1 UP TAPER FROM LOCA-TrlD'ý(A) c -[5 3/4" 312-1. UPPTAPER FROMA L-0 C-ATl-ON A.A)

Ef -t? "' 4b"tP TAPIR FROM LOCAT6N A(

7. "p TAP AR -- FROM LOcA-ri"cN LA)
  • fV\jtýjUM WALL-IDRAWICNc Tb SCALFLJ AT LOCAT\tOI (A'

bIMW 08-O007 1i/o ~/z.

~.L) Ok~~\

atl I

1. i It K.

zz.L __

6z7 GAPEEND M,4 Xt AL 5CAt4 9 DoWN Tr tPER* LCkXItG- UP -FA-PR IOc 7t, ol 0,77 3 57, fN, UP -APEK L-OOOKIzKa oWNi 7PlaR 100 rYc) LF 0375 sg,iK.

.* ../4*_ [RAW, Ne OrscALg-I

!)MW 08-007 VIF-3 1/0 9/ti-t' oz.7-L EJ SAFEEr*4 II 2r CRV C[ICLIA-ERENT1AL SC ANS CLOCK W 15E.VID.0o OF0..773 5t. in,,

0+/- COU* TERCLOCKVW i5f_. I0oyo/e of 0.77,3 st.(vY)

,[R

,D A W'LWCA rO-5 C ALE I,

0 to W3F1-2012-0099 List of Regulatory Commitments to W3F1 -2012-0099 Page 1 of I List of Regulatory Commitments The following table identifies those actions committed to by Entergy in this document. Any other, statements in this submittal are provided for information purposes and are not considered to be regulatory commitments.

TYPE SCHEDULED (Check One) COMPLETION COMMITMENT DATE ONE- D TIME CONTINUING (If Required)

ACTION COMPLIANCE Waterford 3 will perform appropriate X Prior to start-up actions to comply with ASME Section Xl following the Spring Code Case N-770-1 baseline 2014 Refueling examinations for dissimilar metal weld 08- Outage (RF19).

007 prior to startup from the planned Spring 2014 refueling outage. Actions to accomplish compliance with ASME Section XI Code Case N-770-1 consist of the following:'

1. 'Entergy will work with EPRI to design a mock up that incorporates the -

configuration of the Waterford 3 08-007 DMW.

2. This mock-up will be used to demonstrate/qualify the UT technique utilized during the Fall refueling outage (RF18). This UT technique will be performed in accordance with the PDI Site Specific Configuration Mockup Requirements for DM Welds or through procedure expansion in accordance with the PDI Program. If the demonstration should determine that additional scanning is required, Entergy will reexamine weld 08-007 during the scheduled Spring 2014 refueling outage using the newly qualified PDI technique for this configuration.
Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=W3F1-2012-0099,_Request_for_Alternative_W3-1SI-021,_ASME_Code_Case_N-770-1_Baseline_Examination_Request_for_Alternative&oldid=2459347"