|
---|
Category:E-Mail
MONTHYEARML22348A0322022-11-30030 November 2022 NRR E-mail Capture - Request to Resume Endangered Species Act Section 7 Consultation for Decommissioning of San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3 ML22348A0532022-11-30030 November 2022 NRC to National Marine Fisheries Service (Nmfs), Request to Resume Endangered Species Act Consultation for Decommissioning of San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3 ML22278A0182022-10-0404 October 2022 (SONGS) Unit 2 Reactor Head and Closure of Commitments Related to Peaceful Use of Foreign Technology- Acknowledge Receipt ML22265A2122022-09-22022 September 2022 Request for Additional Information for Exemption Request from 100m 72.106(B) Requirement, Docket Nos 50-206, 50-361, and 50-362 ML22119A2422022-04-29029 April 2022 Riv FOLLOW-UP Response: Question About April 11 San Onofre Event ML22034A9962022-02-0202 February 2022 S. Morris Response to C. Langley-Questions About Moving Snf at San Onfre ML21280A1022021-12-0606 December 2021 NRC to NMFS, Supplement to Request to Reinitiate Endangered Species Act Consultation for San Onofre Decommissioning ML21277A2342021-09-30030 September 2021 NMFS to NRC, Receipt of Request to Reinitiate Endangered Species Act Consultation for San Onofre Decommissioning ML21242A0602021-09-30030 September 2021 NRC to NMFS, Request to Initiate Consultation for SONGS Decommissioning ML21117A3492021-03-30030 March 2021 March 30, 2021, Email from Public Watchdogs on Providing New Information to Its October 13, 2020, 2.206 Petition ML21069A2482021-03-10010 March 2021 Umax, 07200054, 05000361, 05000362, FSAR Revision 4 for San Onofre ISFSI ML21068A2712021-03-0909 March 2021 Request for Additional Information Regarding Biological Opinion - SONGS- EPID L-2021-LLL-0006 ML20343A1292020-12-0808 December 2020 NRR E-mail Capture - Request for Additional Information ML20302A3252020-10-21021 October 2020 E-Mail: Acknowledgement of Receipt to the Petitioner Regarding SCE Use of Hi-Storm at SONGS ML20233A7342020-08-18018 August 2020 LTR-20-0313 David Victor, San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS) Community Engagement Panel, Chair, Et Al., Letter Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Security at SONGS and Recent SONGS Community Engagement Panel Meeting on O ML20224A0172020-08-0707 August 2020 8-7-20 Corrected Hearing Time - Intervenor SCEs Acknowledgement of Oral Argument Notice (9th Cir.)(Case No. 20-70899) ML20224A0182020-08-0707 August 2020 8-7-20 Intervenor SCEs Acknowledgement of Oral Argument Notice (9th Cir.)(Case No. 20-70899) ML20204B0782020-07-22022 July 2020 Donna Gilmore Email Holtec Umax Materials (07200054, 05000361, 05000362) ML20198M4522020-07-15015 July 2020 Supplement to Public Watchdogs 2.206 Petition ML20163A3402020-05-0505 May 2020 Email Transmission - Peaceful Use Commitments State Dept for SONGS Rx Heads and Steam Generators ML20120A0282020-04-28028 April 2020 4-28-20 Notice of Addition of James Adler as Attorney for NRC (9th Cir.)(Case No. 20-70899) ML20076A5742020-03-11011 March 2020 Response to A.Mcnally San Onofre Canisters (LTR-20-0003) ML20062F5762020-02-28028 February 2020 Public Watchdogs 10 CFR 2.206 Petition - NRC E-mail to Petitioner Regarding Petition Screening Results February 28, 2020 ML20063M3092020-02-28028 February 2020 Public Watchdogs 10 CFR 2.206 Petition - Response from Petitioner to NRC E-mail Regarding Petition Screening Results, February 28, 2020 ML20059M2292020-02-25025 February 2020 OEDO-20-00053 2.206 Petition - Flooding Likely to Create Radioactive Geysers at SONGS ML20049A0802020-02-14014 February 2020 Public Watchdogs 10 CFR 2.206 Petition - E-mail to Petitioner on Immediate Actions Request Determination February 14, 2020 ML20007E5342020-01-0606 January 2020 Oceansiders Initial Assessment & Public Meeting Response E-Mail ML20006D7012019-12-23023 December 2019 Public Watchdogs 10 CFR 2.206 Petition SONGS - Petitioner Request for Public Meeting and NRC Response - December 23, 2019 ML19354B6762019-12-20020 December 2019 2.206 Petition Initial Assessment Notification E-Mail ML19325C5902019-11-20020 November 2019 2.206 Petition Status Notification Email ML19326B2392019-11-18018 November 2019 Public Watchdogs 10 CFR 2.206 Petition SONGS - Screened-in and PRB November 18, 2019 ML19319B6262019-11-0808 November 2019 Oceansiders 2.206 Petition Immediate Action Response E-Mail ML19326A7122019-10-30030 October 2019 Public Watchdogs 10 CFR 2.206 Petition - SONGS Receipt of Exhibits October 30, 2019 ML19326A9692019-10-25025 October 2019 Public Watchdogs 10 CFR 2.206 Petition - SONGS Immediate Action Determination October 25, 2019 ML19326A3602019-10-23023 October 2019 Public Watchdogs 10 CFR 2.206 Petition - SONGS First E-mail to Petitioner October 23, 2019 ML19284B3232019-10-0808 October 2019 Response LTR-19-0351 Kalene Walker, E-mail Concerns About Critical Safety Problems with Holtec Nuclear Waste Storage System at San Onofre ML19344C7842019-09-0303 September 2019 Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 09-03-2019 RSCS ML19344C7212019-08-30030 August 2019 Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 08-30-2019 J Steinmetz ML19217A1862019-08-0202 August 2019 E-Mail from M. Layton/Nrc to K. Walker/Public San Onofre - SONGS Special Inspection - Damaged Canisters ML19214A1362019-08-0202 August 2019 Riv Pao Response to Mr. Langley Response to Inquiry ML19221B4122019-07-30030 July 2019 Southern California Edison Company, Southern California Nuclear Generating Station, E-mail from Charles Langley to Scott Morris, NRC, Redundant Drop Protection Features at SONGS ML19213A1072019-07-29029 July 2019 Reply to Mr. Langley Re. Redundant Drop Protection Feature at SONGS ML19210D4292019-07-29029 July 2019 E-Mail from M. Layton/Nrc to D. Gilmore/Public Reply to E-Mail Questions ML19210D4342019-07-11011 July 2019 Curtiss-Wright SAS - 10 CFR Part 21 Reporting of Defects for Introl Positioner 890265-010 ML19190A0432019-06-28028 June 2019 Discusses Proprietary Information for Curtiss-Wright SAS - 10 CFR Part 21 Reporting of Defects for Introl Positioner 890265-010 - Cw SAS Initial Report No. 10CFR21-48 ML19165A1102019-06-11011 June 2019 SONGS Webinar (6-3-2019) Message - Sarah Akerson ML19190A0442019-06-0707 June 2019 10 CFR Part 21 Reporting of Defects for Introl Positioner 890265-010 - Cw SAS Initial Report No. 10CFR21-48 ML19158A4432019-06-0404 June 2019 Southern California Edison Company; Scratches on Nuclear Storage Canisters at San Onofre Pose No Problems, NRC Says After Its Own Analysis - Orange County Register ML19156A1422019-06-0404 June 2019 LTR-19-0218 Donna Gilmore, Sanonofresafety.Org, E-mail Scratches on Nuclear Storage Canisters at San Onofre ML19158A1312019-05-31031 May 2019 Paragon Energy Systems LLC -10 CFR Part 21 Report of Defect GS2 Terry Turbine Introl Positioners 2022-09-22
[Table view] |
Text
OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY CORRESPONDENCE CONTROL TICKET Date Printed: Jul30, 2012 13:21 PAPER NUMBER: LOGGING DATE: 07/30/2012 ACTION OFFICE: L - 378 T obLeU- a-3
,0 pp~Op -4cý oyi AUTHOR: Steve Dwyer EDO DEDMRT AFFILIATION: DEDR Chairman Resource DEDCM ADDRESSEE: AO
SUBJECT:
Concerns new geology reports regarding San Onofre (SONGS) fzl V w\UziLa ACTION: Appropriate DISTRIBUTION: Chrm LETTER DATE: 07/27/2012 ACKNOWLEDGED No SPECIAL HANDLING:
NOTES:
FILE LOCATION: ADAMS DATE DUE: DATE SIGNED:
~TL2)PS.EC+O-0(7....- -Se-..
I)S,
Joosten, Sandy From: SD [stexied@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2012 8:52 PM To: CHAIRMAN Resource
Subject:
New Geology Reports RE SONGS chairman Qanrc.gov
Dear Mr. Chairman,
RE SONGS SEISMIC RISKS UPDATE, URGENT ACTION REQUIRED Some new reports on SoCal Geology for your immediate urgent review.
I pray you find time to go over this and if you have any questions, please just ask.
I am also available for a full tour by car or helicopter of the fault here.
I believe once you actually see the Magnitude of the Fault here you will take action.
If you don't actually see these features you will not get a clear picture, as its almost indescribable. Don;t take anyone's word for any of this, just come see it for yourself!
How about we set up a tour with everyone, USGS and Edison etc together?
I think Edison will agree perhaps even sooner than others that this is way too risky to continue with an old design reactor.
They need to spend money on other things rather throw good money after bad, its a simple biz equation in many respects.
Thanks for your prompt attention.
Steve Dwyer Geological Consultant, 40 years http-://blogs.laweeklv.com/informer/2012/07/massive earthquake san andreas 86 possible caltech.php Previous estimates by USGS were M 8.0, and we know from Sumatra and japan that these big ones do far more than expected, additional faults involved, whihc was only a theory until Landers Quake ripped up one then another then another fault !
the complexity of the San Andreas Fault in Coachella Valley just 75mi east of SONGS is among the scariest known!
I
The details on the ground are still here to take a look at, and are just stunning. One has to stand here and look to be impressed by the incredible power of this event. Nowhere else along the fault are such catastrophic features so evident.
http://blogs.laweekly.com/informer/2012/06/earthquake big one power outage california.php Lucy Jones says 20 Feet!
Yet we know that the fault moves at 4cm/year so accumulated strain between quakes can be very large.
(Dr. Barosa at Stanford estimated Japan offset at 98 feet, and USGS estimated Japan at 79 feet ! So 20ft. is still way too conservative)
Estimates of last big quake in the lower section date was around 500 years more or less, which equates to over 60 feet of offset accumulated!
(60 Feet is what Lucy told me in private, but I'm glad to see she has at least up'ed it some. 20 feet is what the Owens Valley Quake moved and that killed everyone there. The scarp down the valley is still almost fresh looking. The mass grave lies a little to the west.
Northridge Quake only moved 4 feet, with 2.4g's acceleration !) ..So if San Andreas Fault is estimated by USGS to be 20 feet now, five times the offset?
Sure its hard to equate offset with magnitude or acceleration, but its still HUGE, and Northridge Acceleration barely attenuated enough to 0.66g's (SONGS Design Criteria) by the time it hit SONGS 80 mi away to prevent SONGS destruction back then. Barely ! One close call. Its time to say enough is enough of this game, and shut it down permanently.
The other option is to shut it down and mothball it, remove all fuels etc and have it as standby AFTER the quake, if it survives at all.
My estimate is that SONGS will look worse than Fukushima, and much more like San Juan Capistrano Do it for the Children Sir ASAP ! http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1 116/1254266219 ebb7084166.*pg http://bcs.whfreeman.com/earthquakes/content/cat 490/bt00eh02.htm#Wrightwood, San Juan Capistrano, California, 1812 SoCal Quake History 2