ML12090A740

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Entergy Pre-Filed Hearing Exhibit ENT000434, General Visual Inspection Report for 10-inch City Water Line from Catskill Water Supply (Oct. 2009)
ML12090A740
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 10/29/2009
From:
Entergy Nuclear Operations
To:
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
SECY RAS
Shared Package
ML12090A727 List:
References
RAS 22156, 50-247-LR, 50-286-LR, ASLBP 07-858-03-LR-BD01
Download: ML12090A740 (6)


Text

ENT000434 Submitted: March 30, 2012 o

o NOTE: This inspection report form is extracted from EN-EP-S-002-MUL TI (Rev. 0 target effective date 10/31/09)

ATTACHMENT 7.1 INSPECTION CHECKLIST Sheet 1 of 2 Piping 1 Tank 1G-lnch City Water Line from INSPECTION 120' EL.

(approx.

_C~a~t~sk~I~II~W~a~~~r~S~u~p~pl~y _____ DATE:

9321-F-41933, 10/29/09 ELEVATION:

grade)

LOCATION DWG:

zone 0-5 INSPECTOR:

J. Peterson NOTE YES

1.

ANY BLISTERING (COATING)?

D NO~ _________ __

YES

2.

ANY PEELING (COATING)?

D NO ~ -----------

YES

3.

ANY FLAKING (COATING)?

D NO ~ ________

YES

4.

ANY DELAMINATION (COATING)?

D NO ~ ________

YES

5.

ANY EMBRITTLEMENT (COATING)?

D NO~ _________ __

YES

6.

ANY EMBEDDED ROCKS (COATING AND/OR METAL)?

D NO ~ -----------

YES

7.

ANY CRACKING (COATING AND/OR METAL)?

D NO ~ ________

YES

8.

ANY RUST (METAL)?

D NO~ _________ __

YES

9.

ANY CORROSION (METAL)?

D NO ~ -----------

YES

10.

ANY FLAKING OR SCALING (METAL)?

D NO ~ ________

YES

11.

ANY MECHANICAL DAMAGE (METAL)?

D NO ~ _________ __

YES

12.

ANY NICKS. GOUGES OR ARC STRIKES (METAL)?

D NO ~ _________ __

YES

13.

ANY TUBERCLES (METAL -IF INTERNAL INSPECTION)?

D NO 0 N/A-extemal inspection only GENERAL APPEARANCE (Inspector): Exterior pipe coating found in aood condition. with no observable discontinuities, peeling. blistering.

separation. embrittlemcnt. flaking. etc. Coating also having good adhesion to the pipe with no bubbled spots (i.e.* gaps between pipe and coating.).

Sec attached photo documentation and Notes. Photo included of the backfill material, showing absence of any large rocks. or foreign material.

DEGRADATION FOUND?

FURTHER EVALUATION REQUIRED?

YEsD NO~

YESD NO~

CR-COMMENTS (Inspector): IO-inch city water line from the City Watt r Storage Tank was inspected at ex.cavalcd location. Line runs approx.imately parallcl with the 16*inch city water line (also excavation under the same modification. F.e 13314). Approx. 8 loot length of pipe inspected.

INSPECTOR(S) PRINTISIGNIDA TE:

V1_ ~ I J. Peterson rtf'T7

  • o NOTE: This inspection report form is extracted from EN-EP-S-002-MUL TI (Rev. 0 target effective date 10/31/09)

ATTACHMENT 7.1 INSPECTION CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of2 EVALUATION:

ACCEPTABLE I:8J ACCEPTABLE WITH DEFICIENCIES D UNACCEPTABLE D RECOMMENDED ACTION (Program Owner):

Capture the results of this piping inspection in the BPT Program database (IDDEAL Scheduleworks).

FUTURE MONITORING: D None required. Future inspections of this line will be as scheduled and managed under the IPEG Buried Pipe and Tank Program. Based on results of this inspection. any future inspections of this line should be at other locations.

o PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE: D None required.

CORRECTIVE ACTIONS: D None required.

PHOTOGRAPHIC OR VIDEO RECORDS ATTACHED?

YES I:8J NO D o

o o

o

~z

/:'.

~

)..

"l

~

AIJ.

4,

,.~

-,,>::z