ML12090A735
| ML12090A735 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Indian Point  |
| Issue date: | 08/12/2011 |
| From: | Entergy Nuclear Operations |
| To: | Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| SECY RAS | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML12090A727 | List:
|
| References | |
| RAS 22156, 50-247-LR, 50-286-LR, ASLBP 07-858-03-LR-BD01 | |
| Download: ML12090A735 (7) | |
Text
ENT000437 Submitted: March 30, 2012 0
)
ENGINEERING STANDARD EN-EP-S-002-MULTI I REV. 0 ENTERGY Buried Piping and Tanks General Visual PAGE 12 OF 12 Inspection ATTACHMENT 7.1 INSPECTION CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 2 IP3 8-inch Fire Protection Line (N/S) at NIW INSPECTION Piping I Tank corner of the WHUT Pit DATE:
8111/11 9321*F-41823, ELEVATION:
EI. 48'-0" LOCATION DWG:
Zone H-7 thru H*9 INSPECTOR:
J. Peterson NOTE YES
- 1.
ANY BLISTERING (COATING)?
D NO 181 YES
- 2.
ANY PEELING (COATING)?
D NO 181 YES
- 3.
ANY FLAKING (COATING)?
D NO ~
YES
- 4.
ANY DELAMINATION (COATING)?
D NO 181 YES
- 5.
ANY EMBRITILEMENT (COATING)?
D NO 181 YES
- 6.
ANY EMBEDDED ROCKS (COATING AND/OR METAL)?
D NO 181 coating inspection only YES
- 7.
ANY CRACKING (COATING AND/OR METAL)?
D NO 181 YES
- 8.
ANY RUST (METAL)?
D NO ~
YES
- 9.
ANY CORROSION (METAL)?
D NO 181 YES N/A - carbon steel piping was
- 10.
ANY FLAKING OR SCALING (METAL)?
D NO 181 externally coated.
YES
- 11.
ANY MECHANICAL DAMAGE (METAL)?
D NO 181 N/A - as above YES
- 12.
ANY NICKS, GOUGES OR ARC STRIKES (METAL)?
D NO 181 N/A - as above YES
- 13.
ANY TUBERCLES (METAL -IF INTERNAL INSPECTION)?
D NO D N/A GENERAL APPEARANCE (Inspector):
All exposed 8-inch piping was externally coated and wrapped carbon steel. The coating and wrap was in very good condition, with NO evidence of flaking, embrittlement, separation from metal, bubbling, blistering, delamination, etc. The entire length of exposed pipe was approx. 35 feet, of which approx. 10 feet was inspected in detail. The inspected length of piping was deemed to be typical of the entire length of the excavated piping.
Photographs ofthe excavated piping is attached to this report.
o
)
ENGINEERING STANDARD EN*Ep*S*002*MUL TI I REV. 0 ENTERGY Buried Piping and Tanks General Visual PAGE 12 OF 12 Inspection ATTACHMENT 7.1 Sheet 2 of 2 DEGRADATION FOUND?
FURTHER EVALUATION REQUIRED?
COMMENTS (Inspector):
INSPECTION CHECKLIST YESO NO~
YESO NO~
CR-I.
This inspection was an opportunistic inspection conducted during excavation ofthe excavation of the area between the IP3 RWST and Waste Holdup Tank Pit (see attached sketch from drawing 9321-F-41823, Zone G-7/9) for the Dry Cask Travel Path mod.
- 2.
Buried portions of a 6-inch FP line was also uncovered and inspected during this excavation activity. A separate inspection report documents the results of that inspection.
INSPECTOR(S) PRINT/SIGN/DATE:
J. Peterson EVALUATION:
ACCEPTABLE ~
ACCEPTABLE WITH DEFICIENCIES 0 UNACCEPTABLE 0 RECOMMENDED ACTION (Program Owner): The results of this inspection will be captured in the Underground Piping and Tank Program database, and used to establish Reasonable Assurance of Integrity, and/or update future piping inspection priorities and schedules.
FUTURE MONITORING: 0 The results of this inspection did not identify any problematic areas in the piping that would warrant future monitoring.
PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE: 0 None recommended.
CORRECTIVE ACTIONS: 0 None required.
PHOTOGRAPHIC OR VIDEO RECORDS ATTACHED?
YES~ NOO PROGRAM OWNER PRINT/SIGNIDATE:
R.e. Lee
~~
/ :.,/
I I,
. :'" \\ ".\\,
TIC.
\\ \\
- ____ --1.-& I,+oud
\\ \\
...., __,_ I I I
-I 2
i 2
ReF: '9w6,' ~"Z.l - ~ - 4[ e z ~
Appl2o'IG ~ ~z;, Fr OF
~ "-F9,-,foJ~ E~VAr
~pp~ 10 Pr Le5q il't VI1>\\A.j)...... y I NS,e-c.Te;>>
T ooIo~
j~,&"~
PLAN-1
~ALI! V ** lto-eIMfTfIiIlATf.N,e& #N6
",,-~- ",,,. I ~I' OPR>F-1UN'~TlC nl~pE;cnON ~ OF ~~~ED ~'PI~(;
"P'd~.( N q -sH AUDw '6"£&AVA -rlDN A ~ SOG-\\~ TEl:>
wm, M.OQ\\l1CA'110~ ~c. l D~'f CA+K ~vGL-pA-r..t
~~-ltJ~1U..5O CGrJ~
~A9~1)