ML12074A229

2012 Byron Initial License Examination Administrative

ML12074A229
Person / Time
Site:	Byron
Issue date:	02/10/2012
From:	Bielby M Operations Branch III
To:	Exelon Generation Co
References
Download: ML12074A229 (4)

Text

NRC Exam Submittal Comments Byron Power Station, Units 1 and 2 Exam Date 01/23/2012 Operating Test 2012-301 Examiner Comment Facility Action/Response Operating Test No comments on Outline Generic Comments Use different colored paper for material examiners give to applicant.

Only put cues that examiner needs to perform this JPM, ie, cues associated with simulator performance.

(RA 3, SA 3, CR A, CR B, CR C, CR D, CR E, CR F, CR G, CR H)

Insert the associated TS Condition action, and time allowed to accomplish the task.

Proposed RO Admin JPM RA 1a Have a correctly filled out Reactivity Change Comment incorporated.

Determination Form Att. 1 of OP-AP-300-1004.

(Information contained in JPM steps)

SRO Admin JPM SA 1a Step 2 Identifying that the wrong unit is marked not a Rewrote step, not critical.

critical step RO Admin JPM RA 1b Examiners needs correctly filled out Data Sheets so Data sheets prepared for exam.

that he can compare with applicants.

SRO Admin JPM SA 1b Step 5 tolerance of hydrogen flow rate from RCS vent Incorporated comments.

should be +/- 50 scfm not 100 scfm. Need to change max and min acceptance criteria in Step 6 to reflect +/-

50 scfm.

RO Admin JPM RA 2 Low level of difficulty. Only has to identify two Added two more steps to identify electrical isolation points no electrical components, no special isolation on prints.

considerations. Rewrite, or replace.

SRO/RO Admin JPM Why is Alert Alarm set at High Alarm setpoint? Dont Adjusted alarm setpoint accordingly to 3.14E-1 of 3

NRC Exam Submittal Comments Byron Power Station, Units 1 and 2 Exam Date 01/23/2012 Operating Test 2012-301 Examiner Comment Facility Action/Response RA/SA 3 normally see that. 04.

Add more to make SRO JPM, ie, TS, or have SRO Revised SA 3 to be a review of BCP 400 and review and authorize release (Step 5). determination that release cannot be made.

SRO Admin JPM SA 4 The NARS form that is provided for the applicant is Comment incorporated.

filled out correctly. Need to provide applicant with blank NARS form.

SRO/RO JPM CR A 1. Need to change Initiating Cue to say Test only 1. Incorporated comment.

S/D Bank E and Control Banks A through D.

2. Is step 5 critical? 2. Yes. Leave as is.

JPM IPj Align U-2AF to Unit 1. Licensee replaced due to Replaced with Local Emergency Start of the _B procedure change. AFW Pump, D(direct) vice N(new), same Safety Function, revised outline.

SRO/RO JPM IP K Get rid of the useless pic that is provided. Just have Agreed.

them open the IB panel door.

Operating Test Scenarios Scenario 1 1. In event 1 please list what TS 3.7.4 Condition 1. Incorporated.

A action is and what time is allowed to accomplish the task. Same for TS 3.6.3 Condition C.

2. In event 5 when will BA pump trip? Also the 2. Incorporated.

scenario should list how much BA should be added per the REMA.

Scenario 2 1. Licensee moved Event 5 to Event 2 1. Incorporated

2. Licensee originally had Events 2, 3 and 4 run 2. Incorporated simultaneously, now Event 2 will run, then Events 3 and 4 will run simultaneously.

2 of 3

NRC Exam Submittal Comments Byron Power Station, Units 1 and 2 Exam Date 01/23/2012 Operating Test 2012-301 Examiner Comment Facility Action/Response

3. On page 5 there is a booth cue that needs to 3. Incorporated.

be changed. In the last line on page 5 an EO shouldnt be telling the RO where 1WO056A is. He should be asking the RO where it is.

4. In event 3 & 4 put BA volume from REMA in 4. Incorporated.

scenario for the examiners.

Scenario 3 1. Licensee changed Event 2 from failing HIGH 1. Incorporated to failing LOW (Original Outline listed as failing LOW; however, the description on Pg 2 described it as failing HIGH).

2. Put note at the bottom of page 16 on the top of 2. Incorporated.

page 17.

3 of 3

ES-201 Examination Preparation Checklist Form ES-201-1 Facility: Byron Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2 Date of Examination: Week of 1/23/2012 Developed by: Written - Facility NRC // Operating - Facility NRC Target Chief Date* Task Description (Reference) Examiners Initials

-180 1. Examination administration date confirmed (C.1.a; C.2.a and b) meb

-120 2. NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (C.1.d; C.2.e) meb

-120 3. Facility contact briefed on security and other requirements (C.2.c) meb

-120 4. Corporate notification letter sent (C.2.d) meb

[-90] [5. Reference material due (C.1.e; C.3.c; Attachment 3)] NA

{-75} 6. Integrated examination outline(s) due, including Forms ES-201-2, ES-201-3, meb ES-301-1, ES-301-2, ES-301-5, ES-D-1's, ES-401-1/2, ES-401-3, and ES-401-4, as applicable (C.1.e and f; C.3.d)

{-70} {7. Examination outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback provided to facility meb licensee (C.2.h; C.3.e)}

{-45} 8. Proposed examinations (including written, walk-through JPMs, and meb scenarios, as applicable), supporting documentation (including Forms ES-301-3, ES-301-4, ES-301-5, ES-301-6, and ES-401-6, and any Form ES-201-3 updates), and reference materials due (C.1.e, f, g and h; C.3.d)

-30 9. Preliminary license applications (NRC Form 398's) due (C.1.l; C.2.g; meb ES-202)

-14 10. Final license applications due and Form ES-201-4 prepared (C.1.l; C.2.i; meb ES-202)

-14 11. Examination approved by NRC supervisor for facility licensee review meb (C.2.h; C.3.f)

-14 12. Examinations reviewed with facility licensee (C.1.j; C.2.f and h; C.3.g) meb

-7 13. Written examinations and operating tests approved by NRC supervisor meb (C.2.i; C.3.h)

-7 14. Final applications reviewed; 1 or 2 (if >10) applications audited to confirm meb qualifications / eligibility; and examination approval and waiver letters sent (C.2.i; Attachment 5; ES-202, C.2.e; ES-204)

-7 15. Proctoring/written exam administration guidelines reviewed meb with facility licensee (C.3.k)

-7 16. Approved scenarios, job performance measures, and questions meb distributed to NRC examiners (C.3.i)

• Target dates are generally based on facility-prepared examinations and are keyed to the examination date identified in the corporate notification letter. They are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case-by-case basis in coordination with the facility licensee.

[Applies only] {Does not apply} to examinations prepared by the NRC.