ML12074A229

2012 Byron Initial License Examination Administrative

ML12074A229
Person / Time
Site:	Byron
Issue date:	02/10/2012
From:	Bielby M Operations Branch III
To:	Exelon Generation Co
References
Download: ML12074A229 (4)

Text

NRC Exam Submittal Comments Byron Power Station, Units 1 and 2 Exam Date 01/23/2012 Operating Test 2012-301 Examiner Comment Facility Action/Response 1 of 3 Operating Test No comments on Outline Generic Comments Use different colored paper for material examiners give to applicant.

Only put cues that examiner needs to perform this JPM, ie, cues associated with simulator performance.

(RA 3, SA 3, CR A, CR B, CR C, CR D, CR E, CR F, CR G, CR H)

Insert the associated TS Condition action, and time allowed to accomplish the task.

Proposed RO Admin JPM RA 1a Have a correctly filled out Reactivity Change Determination Form Att. 1 of OP-AP-300-1004.

(Information contained in JPM steps)

Comment incorporated.

SRO Admin JPM SA 1a Step 2 Identifying that the wrong unit is marked not a critical step Rewrote step, not critical.

RO Admin JPM RA 1b Examiners needs correctly filled out Data Sheets so that he can compare with applicants.

Data sheets prepared for exam.

SRO Admin JPM SA 1b Step 5 tolerance of hydrogen flow rate from RCS vent should be +/- 50 scfm not 100 scfm. Need to change max and min acceptance criteria in Step 6 to reflect +/-

50 scfm.

Incorporated comments.

RO Admin JPM RA 2 Low level of difficulty. Only has to identify two isolation points no electrical components, no special considerations. Rewrite, or replace.

Added two more steps to identify electrical isolation on prints.

SRO/RO Admin JPM Why is Alert Alarm set at High Alarm setpoint? Dont Adjusted alarm setpoint accordingly to 3.14E-

NRC Exam Submittal Comments Byron Power Station, Units 1 and 2 Exam Date 01/23/2012 Operating Test 2012-301 Examiner Comment Facility Action/Response 2 of 3 RA/SA 3 normally see that.

Add more to make SRO JPM, ie, TS, or have SRO review and authorize release (Step 5).

04.

Revised SA 3 to be a review of BCP 400 and determination that release cannot be made.

SRO Admin JPM SA 4 The NARS form that is provided for the applicant is filled out correctly. Need to provide applicant with blank NARS form.

Comment incorporated.

SRO/RO JPM CR A

1. Need to change Initiating Cue to say Test only S/D Bank E and Control Banks A through D.

2. Is step 5 critical?

1. Incorporated comment.

2. Yes. Leave as is.

JPM IPj Align U-2AF to Unit 1. Licensee replaced due to procedure change.

Replaced with Local Emergency Start of the _B AFW Pump, D(direct) vice N(new), same Safety Function, revised outline.

SRO/RO JPM IP K Get rid of the useless pic that is provided. Just have them open the IB panel door.

Agreed.

Operating Test Scenarios Scenario 1

1. In event 1 please list what TS 3.7.4 Condition A action is and what time is allowed to accomplish the task. Same for TS 3.6.3 Condition C.

2. In event 5 when will BA pump trip? Also the scenario should list how much BA should be added per the REMA.

1. Incorporated.

2. Incorporated.

Scenario 2

1. Licensee moved Event 5 to Event 2

2. Licensee originally had Events 2, 3 and 4 run simultaneously, now Event 2 will run, then Events 3 and 4 will run simultaneously.

1. Incorporated

2. Incorporated

NRC Exam Submittal Comments Byron Power Station, Units 1 and 2 Exam Date 01/23/2012 Operating Test 2012-301 Examiner Comment Facility Action/Response 3 of 3

3. On page 5 there is a booth cue that needs to be changed. In the last line on page 5 an EO shouldnt be telling the RO where 1WO056A is. He should be asking the RO where it is.

4. In event 3 & 4 put BA volume from REMA in scenario for the examiners.

3. Incorporated.

4. Incorporated.

Scenario 3

1. Licensee changed Event 2 from failing HIGH to failing LOW (Original Outline listed as failing LOW; however, the description on Pg 2 described it as failing HIGH).

2. Put note at the bottom of page 16 on the top of page 17.

1. Incorporated

2. Incorporated.

ES-201 Examination Preparation Checklist Form ES-201-1 Facility: Byron Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2 Date of Examination: Week of 1/23/2012 Developed by: Written - Facility NRC // Operating - Facility NRC Target Date*

Task Description (Reference)

Chief Examiners Initials

-180

1.

Examination administration date confirmed (C.1.a; C.2.a and b) meb

-120

2.

NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (C.1.d; C.2.e) meb

-120

3.

Facility contact briefed on security and other requirements (C.2.c) meb

-120

4.

Corporate notification letter sent (C.2.d) meb

[-90]

[5.

Reference material due (C.1.e; C.3.c; Attachment 3)]

NA

{-75}

6.

Integrated examination outline(s) due, including Forms ES-201-2, ES-201-3, ES-301-1, ES-301-2, ES-301-5, ES-D-1's, ES-401-1/2, ES-401-3, and ES-401-4, as applicable (C.1.e and f; C.3.d) meb

{-70}

{7.

Examination outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback provided to facility licensee (C.2.h; C.3.e)}

meb

{-45}

8.

Proposed examinations (including written, walk-through JPMs, and scenarios, as applicable), supporting documentation (including Forms ES-301-3, ES-301-4, ES-301-5, ES-301-6, and ES-401-6, and any Form ES-201-3 updates), and reference materials due (C.1.e, f, g and h; C.3.d) meb

-30

9.

Preliminary license applications (NRC Form 398's) due (C.1.l; C.2.g; ES-202) meb

-14

10.

Final license applications due and Form ES-201-4 prepared (C.1.l; C.2.i; ES-202) meb

-14

11.

Examination approved by NRC supervisor for facility licensee review (C.2.h; C.3.f) meb

-14

12.

Examinations reviewed with facility licensee (C.1.j; C.2.f and h; C.3.g) meb

-7

13.

Written examinations and operating tests approved by NRC supervisor (C.2.i; C.3.h) meb

-7

14.

Final applications reviewed; 1 or 2 (if >10) applications audited to confirm qualifications / eligibility; and examination approval and waiver letters sent (C.2.i; Attachment 5; ES-202, C.2.e; ES-204) meb

-7

15.

Proctoring/written exam administration guidelines reviewed with facility licensee (C.3.k) meb

-7

16.

Approved scenarios, job performance measures, and questions distributed to NRC examiners (C.3.i) meb

• Target dates are generally based on facility-prepared examinations and are keyed to the examination date identified in the corporate notification letter. They are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case-by-case basis in coordination with the facility licensee.

[Applies only] {Does not apply} to examinations prepared by the NRC.