ML11259A012

NRR E-mail Capture - Clarification for August 25 Emcb RAI Acceptance Review Letter

ML11259A012
Person / Time
Site:	Crystal River
Issue date:	09/14/2011
From:	Westcott D Progress Energy Florida
To:	Siva Lingam Division of Operating Reactor Licensing
References
TAC ME6527
Download: ML11259A012 (3)

Text

1 NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From:

Westcott, Daniel [Daniel.Westcott@pgnmail.com]

Sent:

Wednesday, September 14, 2011 8:40 PM To:

Lingam, Siva

Subject:

Fw: Clarification for August 25 EMCB RAI Acceptance Review Letter

Siva, As discussed in this afternoon's call, the following email provides additional clarification to our RAI response letter dated 8/25/11.

Sincerely, Dan

---

Original Message -----

From: Ellis, Gregg To: Westcott, Daniel Cc: Porter, David M.; Adelung, Perry; Wilson, Kenneth R; Williams, Ted E.; Rose, Philip Sent: Wed Sep 14 15:30:45 2011

Subject:

Clarification for August 25 EMCB RAI Acceptance Review Letter Dan; Please provide the following information to the NRC based on our teleconference this afternoon:

By letter dated August 25, 2011, Crystal River Unit 3 - Response to Request for Additional Information to Support NRC Mechanical and Civil Branch Acceptance Review of the CR-3 Extended Power Uprate LAR (TAC No. ME6527), Florida Power Corporation, doing business as Progress Energy Florida (PEF), Inc., provided a response to an NRC request for additional information, in part, related to the piping and support design and analyses for the Extended Power Uprate (EPU) plant modifications needed to support the Mechanical and Civil Branch acceptance review of the Crystal River Unit 3 (CR-3) EPU License Amendment Request. Based on an NRC-PEF teleconference on September 14, 2011, the following is provided as clarification to the response letter (3F0811-03) dated August 25, 2011.

Structural evaluations and required design calculations for pipe stress and pipe support evaluations associated with structures, systems, and components (SSCs) credited in the EPU safety analyses have been completed and controlled documentation exists which finds the applicable SSCs are structurally adequate to perform their intended design functions under EPU conditions. These structural evaluations and analyses were completed by PEF or by a vendor with an approved 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Quality Assurance Program, were owner reviewed by PEF, and are vendor-issued controlled documents. These documents are controlled and maintained as part of the CR3 EC package until modification installation and testing is complete, at which time these structural analysis documents will be placed in the CR3 document control system.

2 Sincerely; Gregg Ellis Licensing - CR3 EPU Project gregg.ellis@pgnmail.com <mailto:gregg.ellis@pgnmail.com>

+1-352-563-2943 x4105

+1-407-920-6187

Hearing Identifier:

NRR_PMDA Email Number:

148 Mail Envelope Properties (66C0930ED750B74E80B0F51A1F24D99A1A1793841D)

Subject:

Fw: Clarification for August 25 EMCB RAI Acceptance Review Letter Sent Date:

9/14/2011 8:39:44 PM Received Date:

9/14/2011 8:39:48 PM From:

Westcott, Daniel Created By:

Daniel.Westcott@pgnmail.com Recipients:

"Lingam, Siva" <Siva.Lingam@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None Post Office:

WN000074.oak.zone1.progress-energy.com Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 2363 9/14/2011 8:39:48 PM Options Priority:

Standard Return Notification:

No Reply Requested:

No Sensitivity:

Normal Expiration Date:

Recipients Received: