ML111580043

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Written Retake - Final Qa/Related Forms (Folder 1)
ML111580043
Person / Time
Site: Ginna Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 05/06/2011
From: Hansell S
Constellation Energy Nuclear Group
To: David Silk
Operations Branch I
Hansell S
Shared Package
ML103200302 List:
References
TAC U01838
Download: ML111580043 (6)
v • d • e


Text

ES-201 Examination Preparation Checklist Form ES-201-1 Facility: RE_ Gi . . . ~" Date of Examination: -l (J2:'j.lI tr '"""

.l'A

~

Developed by: Written - Facility ~ NRC 0 /I Operating - Facility NRC t.fl f31 1

(

Target Chief Date" Task Description (Reference) Examiner's Initials

-180 1. Examination administration date confirmed (C.1.a; C.2.a and b) to-J

-120 2. NRC examiners and facility contact assignE~d (C.1.d; C.2.e)

V4-

-120 3. Facility contact briefed on security and other requirements (C.2.c)

~

-120 4. Corporate notification letter sent (C.2.d) t;LiJ-

[-90] [S. Reference material due (C.1.e; C.3.c; Attachment 3)] elY

{-7S} 6. Integrated examination outline(s) due, including Forms ES-201-2, ES-201-3, ES-301-1, ES-301-2, ES-301-S, ES-D-1's, ES-401-1/2, ES-401-3, and ES-401-4, as applicable (C.1.e and f; C.3.d) tH

~

{-70} {7. Examination outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback provided to facility licensee (C.2.h; C.3.e)}

{-4S} 8. Proposed examinations (including written, walk-through JPMs, and scenarios, as applicable), supporting documentation (including Forms ES-301-3, ES-301-4, ES-301-5, ES-301-6, and ES-401-6, and any Form ES-201-3 updates), and reference materials due (C.1.e, f, g and h; C.3.d) \J;\i

-30 9. Preliminary license applications (NRC Form 398's) due (C.l.I; C.2.g; ES-202) .Jd

~~

-14 10. Final license applications due and Form ES-201-4 prepared (C.1.1; C.2.i; ES-202)

-14 11. Examination approved by NRC supervisor for facility licensee review (C.2.h; C.3.f) /;I,/~

-14 12. Examinations reviewed with facility licensee (C.1.j; C.2.f and h; C.3.g) //LJ

-7 13. Written examinations and operating tests approved by NRC supervisor (C.2.i; C.3.h) 'j~

\.~

-7 14. Final applications reviewed; 1 or 2 (if >10) applications audited to confirm qualifications / eligibility; and examination approval and waiver letters sent (C.2.i; Attachment S; ES-202, C.2.e; ES-204)

~

-7 15. Proctoring/written exam administration guidelines reviewed with facility licensee (C.3.k) ~

-7 16. Approved scenarios, job performance measures, and questions distributed to NRC examiners (C.3.i) ~

  • Target dates are generally based on facility-prepared examinations and are keyed to the examination date identified in the corporate notification letter. They are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case-by case basis in coordination with the facility licensee.

[Applies only] {Does not apply} to examinations prepared by the NRC.

ES-201, Page 25 of 28

Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES*201*2 Faclllty: t.,. (;.1 Jo..)f.J A Date of Examlnallon: l/~?

Initial Item Task DesCllptJon a b' ct#

1. a. Verily that the out/lne(s) ftt(s) the appropriate model. In accordance with ES-401. (fM ~ &.1.--

w

~~ ~

R b. Assess whether the oulline was systematically and randomly prepared In accordance with I Sect/on 0.1 of ES-401 and whether an KIA categories are appropriately sampled.

T rl T

E

c. Assess whether the out/lne over-emphaSlzes any systems, evolUUons. or generic topics,

~ ~

N d. Assess Whether the juslillcatlons for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate.

~ Vl1

2. a. Using Form ES-301-5. verily that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number S

of normal evolutions. Instrument and component failures, technical speclftcaUOns.

and major transients. tv/A ~~ t14 r

M b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to lest the projected number and mix of applicants In accordance with the expected crew composlUOn and rotation schedule tJ~ ~t .AIlf U

L without compromising exam Integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using A at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated T from the apptlcants' audll test(~). end that scenarios will not be receated on subsequent days.

0 c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outllne{s) conform(s) with the qualitative R and quantltatlve criteria spacllied on Form ES-301-4 and desCl1bed In Appendix: D. ~/) Nit Mf

a. a. Verily that the systems walk-through out/lne meets the CI1teria specified on Form E8-a01-2:

(1) the out/lna(s) contaln(s) the required number of control room and In-plant tasks w distributed among the safely functions as specified on the form T

I (2) tasl< repetltlon from the last two NRC examinations Is withIn the limits specified on the form (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s)

(4) the number of new or modllied tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specHled on the form Nk ~Ir ~

(6) the number of aHemate path,low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria onthaform.

b. Verily that the administrative oulline meels the Cllterta specified on Form ES-301-1:

(1) the tasks are dlslributed among the topics as specified on the form (2) at leasl one task Is new or significantly modilled (3) no more than one task Is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examlnaUons IJb ~Ir M4

c. Determine If there are enough different ouUlnes to test tha projected number and mix:

of applicants and ensure that no Items are duplicated on subSeQuent days. NJA ~lr fV4

4. a. Assess whether plant~spedlle prlorilies Qncludlng PRA and IPE Insights) are covered

~ f9 G

In the appropriate exam sectlons. 11/

E

b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling Is appropriate. .f/?\ ~ ~

N c. Ensure that KIA Importance ratlngs (except for plant-specific priorlUes) are at least 2.6. I@\ .J3.

E R d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections. ~/A ~ 111ft A e. Check the enUre exam for balance of coverage. C]lc\ .AJ...

L

f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate Job level (RO or SRO). (fi6q 'I Vb
rOSep~ An(41~f~ture -,41 1°
a. Author C-
b. Facility Reviewer (0) K", II (;., v-."IHJI\ ~ .JrJtU/l./'//lA~' AL l q
c. NRC Chief ExamIner (#)
d. NRC SUpervisor ll'l\~,l SIL':: J ~
56. -~'i}-e[( /

I 4..lk

<:;('

-Q

'/ '

Yf/

\.

? ~~g ~

Note: ## Independent NRC reviewer InlOalltems In Column .c"; chief examiner concurrence required.

  • Not applicable for NRC-prepared examlnallon outlines ES-201. Page 26 of 28

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of ~4/.201 / as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not bee'r;authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowl~dge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 41t-3/' I . From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE L.E/1  ;:::7' Iffi./lf ~ 4 "I.J-If

~\_-

.-'t:N"~~~:::-;* k=!c~T J~l~/O~\':O 1~'5cP-~~ ~ 4-1.1-1(

i OK!;> "'f'1CJi'~;J rz...."".N_"-fI-!'

. i.J..;..;k-=---f¥'."..---..= ---;;r;-~ "1

~.r - u /,'el-!J,.,. I r -I'f#-I'~ j<?.:V' Zi.i, l- --:::i5-tf

~.s I't..-U-JO ;o;~ &nail.' Ai?.... _4-14-U

-!0:;['-tl~/:~~~~Y'-l.

.--~~--

?:7iSiiF Sf"'" 5~,tlc1. .sb:(~

'$:;;"QJi:.

41../(1'

~;::;f;:';:-

l~

~-~~~-!,--

d:7i4 tI

~~~ S¥r IbiIII A'r &n!/l. IQ7.-  ?:J:i:-~

- . L... CE?5 __ . l . Z f ) . l / : ; V ~t1741t.  ;<Tt- 01-14-_11_

19 t! /W-SiJI'Y- ft.1 //'/J!}. CCN/Y' . 1-2(.-11  ;;W &n.vl, +-/4-~

5R,tldmu"r"J;;b~iSJ&,t f

'I"" ,wee"1- I'T~ - +-I.?-I/

"~"'r"~11C ...(...-"t ~- 1.. ,IRU t/17ti/~ J1}""v 4-14-1(

-.f--11~

~o .3 ~ I pu M1dil t?r",

~ I 5/Juf' I * ;z.

ES-201, Page 27 of 28

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form E8-201w3

1. Pre-E:xamination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC Dcensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of ([2.1/1 I as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g** acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable If the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the faaUly licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations andlor an enforoement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
2. ps-mmination To the best of my knr:'(;gz I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered duling the week(s) of \ z., " . From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY DATE SIGNATIJRE (2) DATE NOTE

~:.roStifH ~p,.Jur :u.-'o 6f(. J/>>jLtJ ,fw M74i" ffL .(--H--li

3. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ ~

~------------------------------------------

a ______________________________________________

6. __

~-------------------------------------------------

8. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
9. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
10. _ _ __
11. _ _ __
12. _ _ __
13. ___
14. _ _ __
15. _ _ __

NOTES:

SA aI- 2. " 2..

ES-201 Page 27 of 28 t

ES-401 WrHten Examination Quality Checklist Form ES-401*6 Facility: R.E.Glnna Date of Exam: 4/2011 Exam Level: RO SRO X Initial Item DescfiDtion a b* elf.

1. QuestIons and 8I1$wers ere technlcallv acx:urate and 8DDllcabie to the facility. ~ ft511 ffJ..
2. 8. NRC KlAB are refefenced ror ell questions. ~ flY W.
b. Facility learning oblecllves are referenced Il8 avalable. ~ p;r1 itt
3. SRO quastioollare appropriate In accordance with SecIlon O.2.d of ES-401 ~ ~ \ll}
4. The tampllng proc:eaa was rantlom and aystematlc (If more than 4 RO or 2 SRO questions were repeated from the last 2 NRC licensing lXams consult NRR Ol program office.)

qM ~ ~

S. Question duplication from the license IICI'Hnlnglauail exam was controlled as Indicated below (check. the Item that applies) and eppears approptlale:

_ the eudlt exam was ayalemallcally and ranclomly developed; or

~ f11r

_ the audit exam was completed before the license exam was started: or

_ the examinations were developed Independently; or ~

_x.. the licenta certifies that thera Is no duplication; or

_ other (explain)

6. Bank use meets limits (no more than 16 percent Bank Modified New from the bank, at least 10 percent new, and the rest new or modified): enter the adual RO I SRO-only

~

qJV 1M Question dlalribullonCsl at rig hl 34/8 8/4 33/13

7. Between 60 and 60 percent of the questions on the RO Memory CIA exam ara written at the comprehensJvelanalyslsleveJ:

the SRO exam may &xceed 60 percent If the randomly sel&c:ted KlAs support the higher cognitive l&Vela: enter 30/4 45/21

~ ~v Vi the ac:tual RO 1SRO auesUon dlslribuUon(s) at rlcht.

8. Referanceslhandouts provided do not give away enswers ~ (lV ~

or aid In the ellmlnallon of dlslrac:tol'l.

~

9. Question content conforms with apec:tl!c KIA statements In the previoUSly approved

~v examination oulline and Is appropriate for the liar to WhIch they are assigned ~

deviallons are justified.

10. Question DSVchomelrlc Quality and format meet the auldellnaa In ES Aooendix S. OM ~\J \!J
11. The exam contains the required numbel of one point multiple choice Hems.

GM ~5V JQ

a. AUthor the total Is correct and &aree$ with the value on the cover shaet.

3DS(f'1I C. H:.5GUAt/{,;("

Printed Nm $I ture Date 3ltVA,

b. Facility Reviewer (")  ;'1ti1l/Ck.. :r: LJiI1?tr:Y.Cf!.V d14d.t!----. 3/2171 1 Co NRC Chief examiner (I)
d. NRC Regional Supervisor

~S:/Ili:~~ ~l I\.' ~I.

---~

~ . Y;;~'

4? II Nate:

  • The facllty reviewer's Inlllalslalgnature are not applicable ror NRC-dev$loped examinations.
  • Independent NRC reviewer Inltlalltems In Column 'r!; chief examiner concurrence required.

ES*403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Date of Exam: :Jvl'Exam level: RO Initials Item Descri tion 1.

2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented 3.
4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80.

as a licable, +/-4% on the SRO-onl reviewed in detail

5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are 'ustified
6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of uestions missed b half or more of the a licants Printed Name/Signature Date
a. Grader
b. Facility Reviewer(*)
c. NRC Chief Examiner (*)
d. NRC Supervisor ("')

(*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two inde ndent NRC reviews are r uired.

ES-403, Page 6 of 6

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML111580043&oldid=2549563"