Text

Attachment 1, Offsite Dose Calculation Manual, Revision 22
	ML101300370
Person / Time
Site:	Salem
Issue date:	06/09/2009
From:	Shelton J; Public Service Enterprise Group
To:	; Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
	LR-N10-0140
	Download: ML101300370 (156)
	v • d • e

Attachment 1 ODCM Revisions Salem ODCM Rev 22

OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL 1I. FOR PSEG NUCLEAR LLC SALEM GENERATING STATION Revision 22 Prepared By: rShelton Bernard Reviewed by:

S Chemistry Manager Date SQR I. R~viewed by Date Accepted by:

PORC Chairm*n

Date Meeting #: *2ZtO* - oo7 C/)

Approved by:

I-i Date z"

w 0

r')

zi Ld U-Page 1 of 155

I Salem ODCM Rev. 22 S Revision Summary

1. Revised the 1R13 Radiation Monitor configuration in following:

Table 3.3-12, item 2.a., Section 3 /4.3 Instrumentation, Bases, Unit 1, item 2a, Part II -Calculational Methodologies, Sect'ion 1.0 Liquid Effluents, 1.1 Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation and Controls, item 2),

Figure 1-1: Liquid Release Flowpath Unit 1, Table 1-1.1: Parameters for Liquid Alarm Setpoint Determinations - Unit 1.

Justification:

This change is based on DCP 80059610. I 2., Part II- Calculational Methodologies, Table 1-1.2 Parameters for Liquid Alarm Setpoint Determinations -

I Unit 2, foot note ** Added R13 Justification:

Editorial Change: The removal of this monitor from the foot -note was an error.

I I

I 0

0 w

I z

V)

I Ii z I n-0 I 0

7-n-

0 1

U-w

.bJ 0*

U-W Page 2 of 155 I I

1 Salem ODCM Rev. 22 TABLE OF CONTENTS IN TR ODUCTION ................................... ............................................................................................... 7 PART I - RADIOLOGICAL EFFLUENT CONTROLS .............................................................. 8 1.0 DEFINITIONS.... ........... ............................... ........... 10 3/4 CONTROLS AND SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS ........................ 16 3/4.0 APPLICABILITY 16 16..........................

3/4.3 INSTRUMENTATION ........... ....................................................... 18 3/,4.3.3.8 RADIOACTIVE LIQUID EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION ... 18 3/4.3.3.9 RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION 24 3/4.11 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS .... .................................... 29 3/4.11.1 LIQUID EFFLUENTS............. .............................. 29 3/4.11.1.1 CONCENTRATION ......................................... 29 33/4.11.1.2 D OSE .......................................... ........................................... .................................. 33 3/4.11.1 .3 LIQUID RADWASTE TREATMENT ............................................................... 34 3/4.11.2 GASEOUSEFFLUENTS....'........................................................................................ 35 3/4.11.2.1 D O SE RATE ................................................................................................ ...... 35 3/4.11.2.2 DOSE - N OBLE GA SES ........................... ....................... .............. t ................... 38 3/4.11.2.3 DOSE - IODINE-13 1, TRITIUM, AND RADIONUCLIDES IN PARTICULATE FORM ................................................... 39 3/4.11.2.4 GASEOUS RADWASTE TREATMENT .............................................................. 40 O 4.11.4 TO TAL D OSE .................................................................................

3/4.12 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING ..............................................

.................... ............ 41 42 3/4.12.1 M ONITORING PROGRAM ............................................................................................. 42 3/4J'12.2 LAND USE CENSUS ......... .......................... ...................................... ................. 55

< 3/4.12.3 INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM ........................................................ 57 u B A SE S . .................. ................................................................... ............................................. .............. 58 3/4.3 INSTRUMENTATION....................................................................................................

I 3/4.3.3.8 RADIOACTIVE LIQUID EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION .... 59 3/4.3.3.9 RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION 60 59 3/4.11 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS......... *........................................................................... 62 3/4.11.1 LIQU ID. EFFLUENT S ................................................................................................... 62 3/4.11.2 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS ....................................... 63 3/4.11.4 MONI.1.4 TOTA TO L DRINA6 OSE ..... ....................................................................................................... 65 3/4,12 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING ................................ ................. 66 LU 3/4.12.1 MONITORING PROGRAM ....................................... . ................... 66 I_ 3/4.12.2 LAND U SE CEN SU S .......................................................................................

3/4.12.3 INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PRQGRAM ....................

5.0 D E SIG N FEA TU RE S ................................................................

. ....... 66

................................................. 68 66 5 1 SITE............ ......................................................... ?............. ... 688

.5.1.3 UNRESTRICTED AREAS FOR RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS AND LIQUID-EFFLU EN T S ............................................................................................................... 68, 6.0 ADM INISTRATIVE CONTROLS .......................................................... .......... 70 70.........................

6.9.1.7 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ...... 70 6.9.1.8 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT RELEASE REPORT ... ............... ....... 70 O6.15 MAJOR CHANGES TO RADIOACTIVE LIQUID, GASEOUS AND SOLID WASTE 13 TREATM ENT SY STEM S ................................ 72 72..................................

Page 3 of 155 UIcn

Salem ODCM Rev. 22 S PART II- CALCULATIONAL METHODOLOGIES .................................................................... 73 1.0 LIQ U ID EFFLU EN TS ................................................................................................ ................. 74I 1.1 RadiationMonitoringInstrumentationand Controls.......................................................... 74 1.2 Liquid Effluent Monitor Setpoint Determination................................................................ 74 1.2.1 Liquid Effluent Monitors (Radwaste, Steam Generator Blowdown, Chemical Waste Basin and Service W ater ............................................... :........................................... t.................. 75 1.2.2 Conservative Default Values ............................................... 76 1.3 Liquid Effluent ConcentrationLimits - 10 CFR 20 .................................. 77 1.4 Liquid Effluent Dose Calculation- 10 CFR 50 .77...................................................................... 77 144.1 MEMBER OF, THE PUBLIC Dose - Liquid Effluents ................................................. 77 1.4.2 Simplified Liquid Effluent Dose Calculation ............................................................. 79 1.5 Secondary Side Radioactive Liquid Effluents andDose CalculationsDuring Primary to Secondary Leakage ........................................................................................................... 79 1.6 Liquid Effluent Dose Projections........................................ 80 I 2.0 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS ........ *........................................ ...................................................... 81 2.1 RadiationMonitoringInstrumentationand Controls........................... 81 2.2 Gaseous Effluent Monitor Setpoint Determination.................................................................... 82 2.2.1 Containment and Plant Vent Monitor .................................. 82 2.2.2 Conservative Default Values ....................................................................................... 83 2.3 Gaseous Effluent InstantaneousDose Rate Calculations-10 CFR 20 ................ 83 2.3.1 Site Boundary Dose Rate - Noble Gases ................................ 83

2.3.2 Site Boundary Dose Rate - Radioiodine and Particulates ................ ;........................... 85 2.4 Noble Gas Effluent Dose Calculations- 10 CFR 50............................ 85 V) 2.4.1 UNRESTRICTED AREA Dose - Noble Gases ............................................................. 85 2.4.2 Simplified Dose Calculation for Noble Gases .................................................................... 86

"< 2.5 Radioiodine and ParticulateDose Calculations- 10 CFR 50 ................................................. 87 2.5.1 UNRESTRICTED AREA Dose - Radioiodine and Particulates ..................... 87 Z 2.5.2 Simplified Dose Calculation for Radioiodines and Particulates. ................. 87

< 2.6 Secondary Side Radioactive Gaseous Effluents and Dose Calculations........................... 88 V) 2.7 GaseousEffluent Dose Projection............. ;......................... 90.

3.0 SPECIAL DOSE ANALYSES ................................................................................................ 91 3.1 Doses Due To Activities Inside the SITE BOUNDARY ............................................................ 91 3.2 Total dose to MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC- 40 CFR 190 ........................................ :....... I.... 91 0 3.2.1 Effl uent Dose Calculations .......................................................................................... 91 3.2.2 Direct Exposure Dose Determination .......................................................................... 92 4.0 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ........................ 92 4.1 Sampling Program.................................................................................................. ............... 92 Z 4.2 InterlaboratoryComparisonProgram...................................................................................... 92 Lw LU 0

a-L.U LU clý (3I~Page 4ofl155

Salem ODCM Rev. 22 TABLES TABLE 1.1: OPERATIONAL M ODES ............................................................................... 13 3 TABLE 1.2: FREQUENCY NOTATION ....................................

TABLE 3.3-12: RADIOACTIVE LIQUID EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION 14 19 TABLE 4.3-12: RADIOACTIVE LIQUID EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS ...................................... 22 TABLE 3.3-13: RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION.............................. ........... ....... 25 TABLE 4.3-13: RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS ........................................ 27 TABLE 4.11-1: RADIOACTIVE LIQUID WASTE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PROGRAM I..................... .........

....................... ............................. 30 TABLE 4.11-2: RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS WASTE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS 3 P RO G RAM ................................................................

TABLE 3.12.1-1: RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM *..... 44 TABLE 3.12-2: REPORTING LEVELS FOR RADIOACTIVITY CONCENTRATIONS IN

........... ....................................................... 36 ENVIRONME NTAL SAM PLES .............. .................................. ..................................... 51 TABLE 4.12-1: DETECTION

(],(2) CAPABILITIES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLE ANALYSIS() .(2)................................................................................ 52 Table 1-1.1: Parameters for Liquid Alarm Setpoint Determinations Unit 1....... *....................... 96 Table 1-1.2: Parameters for Liquid Alarm Setpoint Determinations - Unit 2 ............. 97 TABLE 1-2: Site Related Ingestion Dose Commitment Factor, Ai . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . '.........

... 98 100 1-3: Bioaccum ulation Factors ......................................... ..........................................

z v*.,Table Table 2-1: Dose Factors For Noble Gases . 103 Table 2-2.1 :.Parameters for Gaseous Alarm Setpoint;Determinations - Unit 1.......................... 104 Table 2-2.2: Parameters for Gaseous Alarm Setpoint Determinations - Unit 2 ........... 105 Table 2-3: Controlling Locations, Pathways .................................. 106

< Table 2-4: Pathway Dose Factors - Atmospheric Releases ........................................................ 107 Table A-i: Calculation of Effective MPC - Unit 1 ............................ 122

<f Table A-2: Calculation of Effective MPC - Unit 2 ....................................................... I............. 123 V) Table B-1: Adult Dose Contributions - Fish and Invertebrate Pathways - Unit I ...................... 127 z"

0 Table B-2: Adult Dose Contributions - Fish and Invertebrate Pathways - Unit 2 ......... ............. 128 V) Table C-l: Effective Dose Factors .......... ..................................................................... ............. 133

>Table D-1: Infant Dose Contributions ...................................... 137 tc TABLE E-l: REMP Sample Locations ....................................... 140 149 I Table F-l1 Maximum Permissible Concentrations ntat ons ... ,.........,................... ......... .... .. ................... 9 Tabxim e -1 m M er is ibl C nc U-Ij*

i.

Page 5 of 155

Salem ODCM Rev. 22 I S I FIGURES FIGURE 5.1-3: AREA PLOT PLAN OF SITE ................................

Figure 1-1: Liquid Release Flowpath Unit 1 69 93 I

Figure Figure Figure 1-2:

1-3:

2-1:

Liquid Release Flowpath Unit 2 ................................

Liquid Radioactive Waste System ...... ................

Salem Ventilation Exhaust Systems and Effluent Monitor Interfaces ..........

94 95 101 I

Figure Figure 2-2:

2-2:

Gaseous Radioactive Waste Disposal System .................................. .............

Gaseous Radioactive Waste Disposal System .................. ................... ...........

Figure E-1: ONSITE SAMPLING LOCATIONS, .............................................................

101 102 146 I

Figure E-2: OFFSITE SAMPLING LOCATIONS ........................... 147 APPENDICES APPENDIX A: EVALUATION OF DEFAULT PARAMETERS FOR LIQUIDEFFLUENTS ................ 1........... 120 APPENDIX B: TECHNICAL BASIS FOR SIMPLIFIED DOSE CALCULATIONS - LIQUID EFFLUENTS APPENDIX C: TECHNICAL BASES FOR EFFECTIVE DOSE FACTORS - GASEOUS EFFLUENTS ............... 130

..125 I APPENDIX D: TECHNICAL BASIS FOR SIMPLIFIED DOSE CALCULATION - GASEOUS EFFLUENTS... .... 135 APPENDIX E: RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM .....................

APPENDIX F: MAXIMUM PERMISSIBLE CONCENTRATION (,MPC) VALUES - LIQUID EFFLUENTS ........ 149 139 I z I C)

I 0

00M QI I

0 z I 0

I C- I n

U-0tml 0Y W I 0>

U-I U-I 0 Page 6 of 155

.I

I Salem ODCM Rev. 22 SALEM NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL INTRODUCTION The Salem Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM) is a supporting document to the Salem Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications. The previous Limiting Conditions for Operations that were contained in the Radiological Effluent Technical Specifications (RETS) are now included in the ODCM as Radiological Effluent Controls (REC). The ODCM contains'two parts: Part I - Radiological Effluent Controls, and Part II - Calculational Methodologies.

Part I includes the following:

The Radiological Effluent Controls and the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Programs I required by Technical Specifications 6.8.4 Descriptions of the information that should be included in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report and the Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report required by Technical Specifications 6.9.1.7 and 6.9.1.8, respectively.

Part II describes methodologies and parameters used for:

the calculation of radioactive liquid and gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation alarm/trip 1

V) setpoints; and 0* the calculation of radioactive liquid and gaseous concentrations, dose rates, cumulative quarterly and yearly doses, and projected doses.

Part 1 also contains a list and graphical description of the specific sample locations for the radiological environmental monitoring program (REMP), and the liquid and gaseous waste treatment systems' Revisions to the ODCM shall be made in accordance with the Technical Specifications Section 6.14.

z" The current licensing basis applies Maximum Permissible Concentrations (MPCs) for radioactive liquid o effluent concentration limits. Since the MPC values were removed from 10CFR20 effective 1/1/94, the

--- MPC values are provided as Appendix F to the ODCM. As discussed in the Safety Evaluation by the W"

ry Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation related to Amendment Nos. 234 and215, letters between the Nuclear Management and Resources Council (NUMARC) concerning the differences between the "old" Z 1I0CFR20 and the "new" 10CFR20 allowed continued use of the instantaneous release limits (MPCs).

The NUMARC letter of April 28, 1993, concluded that the RETS that reference the "old" Part 20 are I

iw generally more restrictive than the comparable requirements of the "new" Part 20, and therefore, in accordance with 10.'CFR 20.1008, the existing RETS could remain in force after the licensee rn0E© J

implements the "new" Part 20. The letter-stated that the existing RETS which reference the "old" Part i20 would maintain the level of required protection of public health and safety, and would be consistent with the requirements of the "new" Part 20.

z ry Page 7 of 155

Salem ODCM Rev. 22 S

I I

PART I - RADIOLOGICAL EFFLUENT CONTROLS I

I Vi)

L.d 0

I z

cz I

w I

z 0

O0 I

n-z" I

ILd

(-D w

I

-J w

I 0

a-w Page 8 of 155 -

I w

(jo i

I Salem ODCM Rev. 22 I< SECTION 1.0 DEFINITIONS IV)

Iz I

IL '-)

I uii I L-Il*LdzO V) uJ I:© Lii Page 9 of 155

I Salem ODCM Rev. 22

. 1.0 DEFINITIONS DEFINED TERMS I 1.1 The DEFINED TERMS of this section appear in capitalized type and are applicable throughout these CONTROLS.

ACTION 1.2 ACTION shall be that part of a CONTROL which prescribes remedial measures required under designated conditions.

CHANNEL CALIBRATION t I 1.4 A CHANNEL CALIBRATION shall be the adjustment, as necessary, of the channel output such that it responds with the necessary range and accuracy to known values of the parameter that the channel monitors. The CHANNEL CALIBRATION shall encompass the entire channel, including the required sensor, alarm, display, and trip functions, and shall. include the CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST.

Calibration of instrument channels with resistance temperature detector (RTD) or thermocouple sensors may consist of an inplace qualitative assessment of sensor behavior and normal calibration of the remaining adjustable devices in the channel. Whenever an RTD or thermocouple sensing element is replaced, the next required CHANNEL CALIBRATION shall include an inplace cross calibration that compares the other sensing elements with the recently installed sensing monitor. The CHANNEL CALIBRATION may be performed by means of any series of sequential, overlapping, or total channel steps so that the entire channel is calibrated.

O CHANNELCHECK s

,, 1.5 A CHANNEL CHECK shall be the qualitative assessment of channel behavior during operation by

<z observation. This determination shall include, where possible,, comparison of the channel indication and/or status with other indications and/or status derived from independent instrument channels measuring the same parameter.

< CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST D 1.6 A CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST shall be the injection of a simulated signal into the channel as V) close to the primary sensor as practicable to. verify OPERABILITY including alarm and/or trip functions.

I z

c-) CONTROL

> 1.10 The Limiting Conditions for Operation (LCOs) that were contained in the Radiological Effluent Technical Specifications were transferred to the OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL

_ (3ODCM) and were renamed CONTROLS. This is to distinguish between those LCOs that were retained in the Technical Specifications and those LCOs or CONTROLS that were transferred to the ODCM.

LJ I> DOSE EQUIVALENT 1-131 1.11 DOSE EQUIVALENT 1-131 shall be that concentration of I-131 (microcuries alone would produce the same thyroid dose as the quantity, and isotopic mixture of per gram), which LX o.. 1-131, 1-132, I-L1 13 3,.I-be13those shall 4, andlisted 1-13 5inactually Federal present.

GuidanceThethyroid Report No.dose conversion 11 (FGR factors used 11), "Limiting for this Values cal cul ation of Radionuclide z Intake'and Air Concentration and Dose Conversion Factors for Inhalation, Submersion and 0

nac Ingestion".

(I)

LX Page 10of155 D "I

Salem ODCM Rev. 22 I O FREQUENCY NOTATION 1.13 The FREQUENCY NOTATION specified for the performance of Surveillance Requirements shall correspond to the intervals defined in Table 1.2.

U GASEOUS RADWASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM 1.14 A GASEOUS RADWASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM is any system designed and installed to reduce radioactive gaseous effluents by collecting primary coolant system offgases from the primary system and providing for delay or holdup for the purpose of reducing the total radioactivity prior to I release to the environment.

MEMBER(S) OF THE PUBLIC 1.16 MEMBER(S) OF THE PUBLIC shall be all those persons who are not occupationally associated with the plant. This category does not include employees of PSE&G, its contractors, or vendors. Also excluded from. this category are persons who enter the site to service equipment or to make deliveries. This category does include persons who use portions of the site for recreational, occupational, or other purposes not. associated with the plant.

OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL (ODCM)

I 1.17 The OFFSITE DOSE: CALCULATION MANUAL (ODCM) shall contain the methodology and parameters used in the calculation of offsite doses due to radioactive gaseous and liquid.

effluents, in the calculation of gaseous and liquid effluent monitoring alarm/trip setpoints, and'in the conduct of the environmental radiological monitoring program. The ODCM shall also contain (1)

Iv the Radioactive Effluent Controls and Radiological .Environmental Monitoring Programs required by

,., Technical Specification Section 6,8:4 and (2) descriptions of the information that should be included z in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating and the Radioactive Effluent Release Reports required by Technical Specification Sections 6.9.1.7 and 6.9.1.8, respectively. -

I7 OPERABLE - OPERABILITY V) 1.18 A system, subsystem, train, component or device shall be OPERABLE or have OPERABILITY when it is capable,of performing its specified function(s), and-when all necessary attendant instrumentation, controls, normal or emergency electrical power source, cooling and seal water, U lubrication or other auxiliary: equipment that"are required for the system, subsystem, train, 2 component or device to perform its specified safety function(s) are also capable of performing their o related support function(s).

LU OPERATIONAL MODE , MODE

. 1.19 An OPERATIONAL MODE (i.e., MODE) shall correspond to any one inclusive combination of core reactivity condition, power level and average reactor coolant temperature specified in Table

1.1. . .

IPURGE 0

- PURGING 1:23 PURGE or PURGING shall be the controlled process of discharging air or gas from a-

w confinement to maintain temperature, pressurehumidity, concentration, or other operating

_c condition, in such a manner that replacement air or gas is required to purify the confinement.

ry Page 11 of 155

I Salem ODCM Rev. 22 RATED THERMAL POWER 1.25 RATED THERMAL POWER shall be a total reactor core heat transfer rate to the reactor, coolant of 3459 MWt.

REPORTABLE EVENT "

1.37 A REPORTABLE EVENT shall be any of those conditions specified:in Section 50.73 to 10CFR Part!50 or 10CFR.72.75.

SITE BOUNDARY 1.29 The SITE BOUNDARY shall be that line beyond which the land is not owned, leased, or otherwise controlled by the licensee, as shown in Figure 5.1 -3.

SOURCE CHECK 1.31 SOURCE.CHECK-shall be the qualitative assessment of.channel response when the. channel I sensor is exposed to either (a) an external source of increased radioactivity, or (b) an internal source of radioactivity (keep-alive source), or (c) an equivalent electronic source check. I THERMAL POWER 1.33 THERMAL POWER shall be the total reactor core heat transfer rate to the reactor coolant. I UNRESTRICTED AREA AnUNRESTRICTED U1.35 AREA shall be any area.at or beyond the SITE BOUNDARY,. access to which is not controlled by the licensee for purposes of protection of individuals from exposure toI w, radiation and radioactive materials, or any area within the SITE BOUNDARY used for residential z quarters or industrial, commercial-, institutional, and/or recreational purposes..

rI VENTILATION EXHAUST TREATMENT SYSTEM

~z 1.36 A VENTILATION EXHAUST TREATMENT SYSTEM shall be any system designed and to'reduce gaseous installedventilation radioiodine and radioactive material in.particulate form in effluents by or vent exhaust 0passing gases -through charcoal adsorbers and/or HEPA filters for the purpose of removing iodines: or particulates from the gaseous exhaust stream prior to the release to the environment (such a system is not considered to have any effect on noble gas effluents).

Sz Engineered Safety Feature (ESF) atmospheric cleanup .systems are not considered to be, 0, VENTILATION EXHAUST TREATMENT SYSTEM components. i ay VENTING

0. 1.37 VENTING shall be the controlled process-of discharging air or gas from a confinement to maintain temperature, pressure, humidity, concentration, or other operating condition, in such a U- manner that replacement air or gas is not provided or required during VENTING. Vent, used in d> system names, does not imply a VENTING process.

0 WASTE GAS HOLDUP SYSTEM wd 1.41 A WASTE GAS HOLDUP SYSTEM shall be any system designed and installed to reduce

_n radioactive gaseous effluents by collecting Reactor Coolant System offgases from the Reactor z Coolant System and providing for delay or holdup for the purpose of reducing the total radioactivity 0

noa prior to release to the environment.

0 a: Page 12 of 155 w.

D

I I Salem ODCM Rev. 22 I. TABLE 1.1: OPERATIONAL MODES REACTIVITY AVERAGE COOLANT MODE CONDITION, Kff THERMAL POWER* TEMPERATURE

1. POWER OPERATION > 0i99 > 5% > 350OF

2. STARTUP > 0.99: <5%

> 350OF

3. HOT STANDBY < 0.99 0 > 350°F'

4. HOT SHUTDOWN < 0.99 0 350OF > Tavg

> 200OF i 5. COLD SHUTDOWN < 0.99 0 < 200OF i 6. REFUELING** < 0.95 0 < 140OF Excluding decay heat.

<. ** Fuel in the reactor vessel with the vessel head closure bolts less than fully tensioned or with the head removed.

V)

LU L"

0 0::.

Page 13 of 155 i

I Salem ODCM Rev. 22 I

S I TABLE 1.2: FREQUENCY NOTATION NOTATION FREQUENCY I S At least once per 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months .

D At least once per 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months . I w Atleast once per .7 days.

M At least once per 31 days.

I Q At least once per 92 days.

SA At least once per 6 months.

R At least once per 18 months.

S/U Prior to each reactor startup.

P Prior to each release. I N.A. Not applicable. I z

I zO I-*

I z

I 0

(__

z" I

0 LJ nUv-0 i,

0~

CD 0v-0 w,

w.,

0 D. Page 14 of 155

Salem ODCM Rev. 22 SECTIONS 3.0 AND 4.0 CONTROLS AND SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS IV)

LU u-)

II U-0 Page 15 of 155

Salem ODCM Rev. 22 3/4 CONTROLS AND SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 3/4.0 APPLICABILITY I CONTROLS 3.0.1 Compliance with the CONTROLS contained in the succeeding CONTROLS is required during I the OPERATIONAL MODES or other conditions specified therein; except that upon failure to meet the CONTROL, the associated ACTION requirements shall be met.

3.0.2 Noncompliance with a CONTROL shall exist when the requirements of the CONTROLS and associated ACTION requirements are not met within the specified time intervals. If the CONTROL is restored prior to expiration of the specified time intervals, completion of the ACTION requirements is not required.

3.0.3 When a CONTROL is not met except as provided in the associated ACTION, requirements, within one hour action shall be initiated to place the unit in a MODE in which the CONTROL does not apply by placing it, as applicable, in:

1. At least HOT STANDBY within the next 6 hours6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months ,

2. Atleast HOT SHUTDOWN within the following 6 hours6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months , and I o_ 3. At least COLD SHUTDOWN within the subsequent 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months .

o Where corrective measures are completed that permit operation under the ACTION requirements, the ACTION may be taken in accordance with the specified time limits as measured from the time of failure to meet the CONTROL. Exceptions to these requirements are stated in the individual CONTROLS.

0*

This CONTROL is not applicable in MODE 5 or 6.

V-2" 3.0.4 Entry into an OPERATIONAL MODE or other specified condition:

0

> (a) shall not be made when the conditions of the CONTROL are not met and the associated c*'" ACTION requires a shutdown if they are not met within a specified time interval.

7- (b) may be made in accordance with ACTION requirements when conformance to them permits continued operation of the facility for an unlimited period of time.

This provision shall not prevent passage through or to OPERATIONAL MODES as required to comply

.o with ACTION requirements. Exceptions to these requirements are stated in the individual CONTROLS.

-.2 "NI z

0 SII rK Page 16 of 155 DI

Salem ODCM Rev. 22 APPLICABILITY Io SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.0.1 Surveillance Requirements shall be met during the OPERATIONAL MODES or other conditions specified for individual CONTROLS unless otherwise stated in an individual Surveillance Requirement.

4.0.2 Each Suiveillance Requirement shall be performed within the specified surveillance interval with a maximum allowable extension not to exceed 25 percent of the specified surveillance interval.'

4.0.3 Failure to perform a Surveillance Requirement within the allowed surveillance interval, defined by CONTROL 4.0.2, shall constitute a failure to meet the OPERABILITY requirements for a CONTROL. The time limits of the ACTION requirements are applicable at the time it is identified that a Surveillance Requirement has not been performed. The ACTION requirements may be delayed for up to 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months to permit the completion of the surveillance when the allowed outage time limits of the ACTION requirements are less than 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months . Surveillance Requirements do not have to be performed on inoperable equipment.

4.0.4 Entry into an OPERATIONAL MODE or other specified condition shall not be made unless the Surveillance Requirement(s) associated with the CONTROL has been performed within the Stated surveillance interval or as otherwise specified. This provision shall not prevent passage through or to OPERATIONAL MODES a's required to comply with ACTION requirements.

C/)

LuJ LU U-I!!

0 1Wi U-ze Page 17 of 155 Iy

!I Salem. ODCM Rev. 22 S 3/4.3 INSTRUMENTATION' 3/4.3.3.8 RADIOACTIVE LIQUID EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION CONTROLS -

3.3.3.8 In accordance with Salem Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications 6.8.4.g. 1, the radioactive i liquid effl uent monitoring instrumentation channels ýhown in Table 3.3-12 .shall be OPERABLE with their alarm/trip setpoints set to ensure that the limits of CONTROL 3.11.1.1 are not exceeded. The 3 alarm/trip setpoints of these channels shall be determined in accordance with the OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL (ODCM).

APPLICABILITY: During all liquid releases via these pathways.

ACTION:

a. With a radioactive liquid effluent monitoring instrumentation. channel alarm/trip setpoint, less conservative than required by the above CONTROL, without delay suispend the release of radioactive liquid effluents monitored by the affected channel or declare the channel inoperable or change the setpoint so it is acceptably conservative.

b. With less than the minimum number of radioactive liquid effluent monitoringI instrumentation channels OPERABLE, take the ACTION shown in Table 3.3-12. Exert best efforts to return the instrument to OPERABLE status within 30 days and, if unsuccessful, explain in the next radioactive effluent release report why the inoperability was not corrected in a timely manner.

< c. The provisions of CONTROLS 3.0.3 and 3.0.4 are not applicable.

H---

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 0

4.3.3.8 Each radioactive liquid effluent monitoring instrumentation channel shall be demonstrated

.W OPERABLE by performance of the CHANNEL CHECK, SOURCE CHECK, CHANNEL

, iCALIBRATION, and CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST operations at the frequencies shown U--

in Table 4.3-12. .

0~ ~I L-MZ cn 0

0y

~I oPage 18 of155 WU 0)

USER RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING REVISION, STATUS AND CHANGES Salem ODCM Rev. 22 TABLE 3.3-12: RADIOACTIVE LIQUID EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION MINIMUM.

CHANNELS

.INSTRUMENT. OPERABLE ACTION ACTION

1. GROSS RADIOACTIVITY MONITORS PROVIDING AUTOMATIC TERMINATION OF RELEASE

a. Liquid Radwaste Effluent Line 1 (1R18, 2R18) 26

b. Steam GeneratorBlowdown Line 4 (1R19A-D, 2R19A-D) 27

2. GROSS RADIOACTIVITY MONITORS NOT PROVIDING AUTOMATIC TERMINATION OF RELEASE

a. Containment Fan Coolers - Service Water Line 2(Unit 1) (IR13A,B) 28 Discharge 2 (Unit 2) (2R13A, B)

b. Chemical Waste Basin 1 (R37) 31

3. FLOW RATE MEASUREMENT DEVICES

a. Liquid Radwaste Effluent Line 1 (1FR1064, 2FR1064) 29

b. Steam Generator Blowdown Line 4 (1FA-3178,-3180,-3182,-3184, 29 2FA-3178, -3180, -3182, -3184)

Page 19 of 155

Salem ODCM Rev. 22 TABLE 3.3-12 (Continued)

I TABLE NOTATION I ACTION 26 - With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, effluent releases may continue provided that prior to initiating a release:

I

a. At least two independent samples are analyzed in accordance with CONTROL 4.11.1.1.1, and I

b. At least two technically qualified members of the Facility Staff independently verify the release rate calculations and discharge line valving; I Otherwise, suspend release of radioactive effluents via this pathway.

ACTION 27 - With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels I

OPERABLE requirement, effluent releases via this pathway may continue provided grab samples are analyzed for principal gamma emitters, 1-131, and dissolved and entrained gases at the lower limits of detection required in ODCM CONTROL Table 4.11-1.B, and I

the ODCM Surveillance Requirement 4.11.1.1.2 is performed:

a. At least once per 8 hours9.259259e-5 days 0.00222 hours 1.322751e-5 weeks 3.044e-6 months when the specific activity of the secondary coolant is I

greater than 0.01 microcuries/gram DOSE EQUIVALENT 1-13 1, or

b. At least once per 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months when the specific activity of the secondary coolant is less than or equal to 0.01 microcuries/gram DOSE EQUIVALENT 1-13 1.

I C-ACTION 28 - With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, effluent releases via this pathway may continue provided that:

I zCn I---

a. At least once per 8 hours9.259259e-5 days 0.00222 hours 1.322751e-5 weeks 3.044e-6 months , local monitor readouts for the affected channels are verified to be below their alarm setpoints, or (Unit 2)

I

b. With a Service Water System leak on the Containment Fan Coil Unit associated z.

with the inoperable monitor either:

I

1. At least once per 8 hours9.259259e-5 days 0.00222 hours 1.322751e-5 weeks 3.044e-6 months , grab samples are to be collected and analyzed for

(_9<7 principal gamma emitters, 1-13 1, and dissolved and entrained gases at the lower limits of detection specified in ODCM CONTROL Table 4.11 -1.B, and I the ODCM Surveillance Requirement 4.11.1.1.2 is performed, or z0 n

2. Isolate the release pathway.

I 0 c. With no identified service water leakage on the Containment Fan Coil Unit ILl associated with the inoperable monitor; at least once per 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months , collect grab samples and analyze for principal gamma emitters, 1-131, and dissolved and I entrained gases at the lower limits of detection specified in ODCM CONTROL I

LI, w Table 4.11-1 .B, and the ODCM Surveillance Requirement 4.11.1.1.2 is performed.

LI-)

w__

U-i Page 20 of 155 LI_)

(,'

Salem ODCM Rev. 22 TABLE 3.3-12 (Continued)

I. TABLE NOTATION ACTION 29 - With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, effluent releases via this pathway may continue provided the flow rate is estimated at least once per 4 hours4.62963e-5 days 0.00111 hours 6.613757e-6 weeks 1.522e-6 months during actual releases.

Pump performance curves may be used to estimate flow.

ACTION 31 - With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, effluent releases via this pathway may continue provided that sampling is conducted in accordance with the following table:

Frequency Condition .,

1 per week During normal operation (all MODES)

I per day During operation with an identified primary to secondary leak on either Salem Unit The samples shall be analyzed for principal gamma emitters, I-131, and dissolved and entrained gases at the lower limits of detection specified in ODCM CONTROL Table 4.11-1..B, and the ODCM Surveillance Requirement 4.11.1.1.2 shall be performed.

C-)

r, U-0 0

0-Page 21 of 155

USER RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING REVISION, STATUS AND CHANGES S 0 Salem ODCM Rev. 22 TABLE 4.3-12: RADIOACTIVE LIQUID EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS CHANNEL CHANNEL SOURCE CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL INSTR I MPNT CHECK CHECK CALIBRATION TEST

1. GROSS RADIOACTIVITY MONITORS PROVIDING ALARM AND AUTOMATIC TERMINATION OF RELEASE

a. Liquid Radwaste Effluent Line D R(3) Q(1) b* Steam Generator Blowdown Line D M R(3) Q(I)

2. GROSS RADIOACTIVITY MONITORS PROVIDING ALARM BUT NOT PROVIDING AUTOMATIC TERMINATION OF RELEASE

a. Containment Fan Coolers - Service Water Line D. M R(3) Q(2)

Discharge

b. Chemical Waste Basin Line D M R(3) Q(5)

3. FLOW RATE MEASUREMENT DEVICES - -.

a. Liquid Radwaste Effluent Line D(4) N.A. N.A.

b. Steam Generator Blowdown Line D(4) N.A. R N.A.

Page 22 of 155 m- mm~ - - - -- m n-m--m

.... Salem ODCMRev. 22.

TABLE 4.3-12 (Continued)

TABLE NOTATION (1) The CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST shall also demonstrate that automatic isolation of this pathway and Control Room alarm annunciation occurs if any of the following conditions exist:

1. Instrument indicates measured levels at or above the alarm/trip setpoint.

2.- Circuit failure'. (Loss'of Power)

3. Control R6om Instrument indicates a downscale failure.

(2) The CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST shall also demonstrate that control room alarm annunciation occurs if any of the following conditions exist:,

1. Instrument indicates measured levels at or above the alarm/trip setpoint.

2. Circuit failure. (Loss of Power)

3. Control Room Instrument indicates a downscale failure.

4. Instrumeit controls not set in operate mode. (On instruments equipped with operate I . mode switches only (Unit 1})

(3) The initial CHANNEL CALIBRATION was performed using appropriate liquid or gaseous calibration sources obtained from reputable suppliers. The activity of the calibration sources

-< were reconfirmed using a multi-channel analyzer which was calibrated using one or more NBS r (now NIST) standards.

(4) CHANNEL CHECK shall consist of verifying indication of flow during periods of release.

< CHANNEL CHECK shall be made at least once per 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months on days on which continuous, periodic, or batch releases are made.

I ~(5) The CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST shall also demonstrate that Control Room alarm Z" annunciation occurs if any of-the following conditions exist:

L-

> 1. Instrument indicates measured levels at or above the alarm/trip setpoint.

IX 2.. Circuit failure. (Loss of Power)

The Rl 8's channels off-line channels which requires periodic decontamination. Any count rate indication above 10,000 cpm constitutes a SOURCE CHECK for compliance purposes.

0 CL4 I.a 2 f IPage23 of 155:

I Salem ODCM Rev. 22 3/4.3 INSTRUMENTATION I 3/4.3.3.9 RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION CONTROLS 3.3.3.9 In accordance with Salem Units I and 2 Technical Specifications 6.8.4.g.1, the radioactive gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation channels shown in Table 3.3-13 shall be OPERABLE with their alarm/trip setpoints set to ensure that the limits of CONTROL 3.11.2.1 are not exceeded. The alarm/trip setpoints of these channels shall be determined in accordance I with the ODCM.

APPLICABILITY: As shown in Table 3.3-13 ACTION:

a. With a radioactive gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation channel alarm/trip setpoint less conservative than required by the above CONTROL, without delay suspendthe release of radioactive gaseous effluents monitored by the affected channel or declare the channel inoperable or change the setpoint so it is acceptably conservative.

b. With less than the minimum number of radioactive gaseous effluent monitoring

. .instrumentation channels OPERABLE, take the ACTION shown in Table 3.3-13.

z< Exert best efforts to return the instrument to OPERABLE status within 30 days and, if unsuccessful, explain in the next radioactive effluent release report why the

. inoperability was not corrected in a timely manner.

(I)D c. The provisions of CONTROLS 3.0.3 and 3.0.4 are not applicable.

H---

z" SURVEILLANCE REUIREMENTS ...

(I-)-o

'"oy .4.3.3.9 Each radioactive gaseous effluent monitoring.instrumentation channel shall be 0D demonstrated OPERABLE by performance of the CHANNEL CHECK, SOURCE CHECK,

_Z CHANNEL CALIBRATION, and CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST operations at the I- frequencies shown in Table 4.3-13.

I~a..I 0

MDI

_Li c* Page 24 of 155

RISEIoNSsIBLE FOR VERIFYING REVISION, STATUS AND CHANGES Salem ODCM Rev. 22 TABLE 3.3-13: RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION MINIMUM CHANNELS INSTRUMENT OPERABLE APPI .Ir*AR .iITY ACTION ACTIO APPLICARILIT

1. WASTE GAS HOLDUP SYSTEM

a. Noble Gas Activity Monitor - Providing I (1R41A&D,

31 Alarm and Automatic Termination of Release. 2R41A&D)

2. CONTAINMENT PURGE

a. Noble Gas Activity Monitor 1 (1R12A or 1R41A&D, ** 34 2R12A or 2R41A&D) #

3. CONTAINMENT PRESSURE - VACUUM RELIEF

a. Noble Gas Activity Monitor I (1R12A or 1R41A&D **

.37 2R12A or 2R4IA & D)#

4. PLANT VENT HEADER SYSTEM##

a. Noble Gas Activity Monitor I (1R41A&D,:2R41A&D)

33

b. Iodine Sampler 1 (1RME4, 5 or 1XT8911, . 36 2RME4, 5 or 2XT8911)

c. Particulate Sampler 1 (lRME4, 5 or 1XT8911,

36 2RME4, 5 or 2XT8911)

d. Process Flow Rate Monitor (stack) I (1RM-IFA8603,

32 2RM-2FA8603)

e. Sampler Flow Rate Monitor 1 (1RM-1FA17079 or S1PAS-1FA6863Z,

32 2RM-2FA17079 or S2PAS-2FA6863Z)

1. The following process streams are routed to the plant vent where they are effectively monitored by the instruments described:

(a) Condenser Air Removal System (b) Auxiliary Building Ventilation System (c) Fuel Handling Building Ventilation System (d) Radwaste Area Ventilation System (e) Containment Purges & Pressure-Vacuum Relief Page 25 of 155

I Salem ODCM Rev. 22 I a

ACTION 31 -

TABLE 3.3-13 (Continued)

TABLE NOTATION With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels I

OPERABLE requirenient, the contents of the tank(s) may be released to the environment provided that prior to initiating the release:

a. - At least two independent samples of the tank's contents are analyzed, and I

b. At least two technically qualified members of the Facility Staff independently verify the release rate calculations and discharge valving lineup; Otherwise, suspend release of radioactive effluents via this pathway.

I ACTION 32 - With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, effluent releases via this pathway may continue provided the flow rate is estimated at least once per 4 hours4.62963e-5 days 0.00111 hours 6.613757e-6 weeks 1.522e-6 months .

I ACTION 33 - With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, effluent releases via this pathway may continue provided grab samples are taken at least once per 8 hours9.259259e-5 days 0.00222 hours 1.322751e-5 weeks 3.044e-6 months and these samples are analyzed for gaseous principal I

gamma emitters at the lower limits of detection required in ODCM CONTROL TABLE 4.11-2.A, B, or C within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months . Otherwise, suspend release of radioactive effluents via this pathway.

I ACTION 34 - With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, immediately suspend PURGING of radioactive effluents via this pathway..

I 0

ACTION 36 - With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, effluent releases via this pathway may continue provided that within I

4 hours4.62963e-5 days 0.00111 hours 6.613757e-6 weeks 1.522e-6 months samples are continuously collected with auxiliary sampling equipment as required in 0 I Z

Table 4.11-2.

n-z ACTION 37 - With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, Containment Pressure Reliefs may be performed provided that prior 7

V) to initiating the release:

a. At least two independent samples of containment are analyzed, and I

0 z"

0

b. At least two technically qualified members of the Facility Staff independently verify the release rate calculations.

Otherwise, suspend release of radioactive effluents via this pathway.

I 0

At all times, other than when the line is valved out and locked.

During Containment Purges OR Containment Pressure - Vacuum Relief I

z APPLICABILITY:

Modes 1-6, R4.1A/D Monitors providing Alarm and Automatic Termination of Release, or Modes 1-5, R12A Monitor providing Alarm and Automatic Termination of Release, or Mode 6, R12A Monitor providing Alarm only (Automatic Termination of Release is not required).

I During Mode Undefined (Defueled) operation, containment purge is reclassified as a building ventilation I

U-process stream monitored by the PLANT VENT HEADER SYSTEM.

During movement of irradiated fuel within containment with the Containment Equipment Hatch OPEN, only 0 R4,1A/D can be credited for MINIMUM CHANNEL OPERABLE.

During movement of irradiated fuel within containment with the Containment Equipment Hatch CLOSED, R4 IA/D or R12A may be credited for MINIMUM CHANNEL OPERABLE.

I 0

0d I

Page 26 of 155 D

I

RE U ONSIBCE FO VERIF iNO REVISION, STATUS AND CHANGES Salem ODCM Rev. 22 TABLE 4.3-13: RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS CHANNEL MODES IN WHICH CHANNEL SOURCE CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL SURVIELLANCE INSTRUMENT CHECK CHECK CALIBRATION TEST REQUIRED

1. WASTE GAS HOLDUP SYSTEM

a. Noble Gas Activity Monitor - Providing P P R(3) Q(I)

Alarm and Automatic Termination of Release

2. CONTAINMENT PURGE AND PRESSURE - VACUUM RELIEF

a. Noble Gas Activity Monitor P P R(3) Q(l) **

3. PLANT VENT HEADER SYSTEM#

a. Noble Gas Activity Monitor D M R(3) Q(2) *

b. Iodine Sampler W N.A. N.A. N.A. *

c. Particulate Sampler W N.A. N.A. N.A. *

d. Process Flow Rate Monitor (stack) D N.A. R N.A. *

e. Sampler Flow Rate Monitor W N.A. R N.A& *

The following process streams are routed to the plant vent where they are effectively monitored by the instruments described:

(a) Condenser Air Removal System (b) Auxiliary Building Ventilation System (c) Fuel Handling Building Ventilation System (d) Radwaste Area Ventilation System (e) Containment Purges & Pressure-Vacuum Relief Page 27 of 155

I Salem ODCM Rev. 22 I

I TABLE 4.3-13 (Continued)

TABLE NOTATION (1) The CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST shall also demonstrate that automatic isolation of this pathway and Control Room alarm annunciation occurs if any of the following conditions exist-

1. Instrument indicates measured levels above the alarm/trip setpoint. I

2. Circuit failure. (Loss of Power), I

3. Control Room Instrument indicates a downscale failure. (Alarm Only)

(2) The CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST shall also demonstrate that control room alarm annunciation occurs if any of the following conditions exist:

1. Instrument indicates measured levels at or above the alarm/trip setpoint. I

2. Circuit failure. (Loss of Power)

3. Control Room Instrument indicates a downscale failure.

V) (3) The initial CHANNEL CALIBRATION was performed using appropriate liquid or gaseous calibration sources obtained from reputable suppliers. The activity of the calibration sources were z reconfirmed using a multi-channel analyzer which was calibrated using one or more NBS (now

<-) NIST) standards.

~I

<C

At all times C** During Containment Purges OR Containment Pressure - Vacuum Relief Surveillance requirement -

I . Modes 1-6, R4 1AiD Monitors providing Alarm and Automatic Termination of Release Modes 1-5, R12A Monitors providing Alarm and Automatic Termination of Release 0" Mode 6, R12A Monitors providing Alarm only (Automatic Termination of Release On is not required). I During Mode Undefined (Defueled) operation, containment purge is reclassified as a building CY ventilation process stream monitored by the PLANT VENT HEADER SYSTEM.

During movement of irradiated fuel within containment with the Containment Equipment Hatch

-- OPEN, only R41A/D can be credited for MINIMUM CHANNEL OPERABLE.

During movement of irradiated fuel within containment with the Containment Equipment Hatch CLOSED, R4lA/D or R12A may be credited for MINIMUM CHANNEL OPERABLE.

0 U--

-JI

_.3 co U-0I Li Page 28 of 155

Salem ODCM Rev. 22 3/4.11 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS 3/4.11.1 LIQUID EFFLUENTS 3/4.11.1.1' CONCENTRATION CONTROLS 3.11.1.1 In accordance with the Salem Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications 6.8.4.g. 2 and 3, the concentration of radioactive material released in liquid effluents to UNRESTRICTED AREAS (See Figure 5.1-3) shall be limited to the concentrations specified in 10 CFR Part 20, Appendix B, Table H, Column 2 for radionuclides other than dissolved or entrained noble gases. For dissolved or entrained noble gases, the concentration shall be limited to 2 x 104 microcuries/ml.

APPLICABILITY: At all times.

ACTION:

With the concentration of radioactive material released in liquid effluents to UNRESTRICTED AREAS exceeding the above limits, without delay restore the concentration to within the above limits.

I O SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS I w 4.11.1.1.1 Radioactive liquid wastes shall be sampled and analyzed according to the sampling and analyses z program in Table 4.11-1.

-r-U) 4.11.1.1.2 The results of the radioactivity analyses shall be used in accordance with the ODCM to assure that the concentrations at the point of release are maintained within the limits of CONTROL 3.11.1.1.

Cf) z" 0

V-Page 29 of 155

I Salem ODCM Rev. 22 I 0 TABLE 4.1 1-1: RADIOACTIVE LIQUID WASTE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PROGRAM I

Lower Limit Liquid Release Type Sampling Frequency Minimum Analysis Frequency Type of Activity Analysis of Detection (LLD)a (itCi/ml)

I A. Batch Waste P P I Release Each Batch Each Batch Principal Gamma 0 Tanksb Emittersc 5x I0"7 1xI10 6 I

1-131 P M Dissolve and 5 I One Batch/M Entrained Gases 1x10 P M (Gamma Emitters)

H-3 I

Each Batch Composite d .lxl0.5

.Gross Alpha 10.7 I 03 S P Q Sr-89, Sr-90 5x108 I

Each Batch Composite z

D Fe-55 lxl0"6 U

-) I z

B. Continuous Principal Gamma 5x 0-7 EmittersC 2ý H--

Releases'

1. Steam W

Grab Sample W

I Generator z"

Blowdown lx10 6 I

CO 0 1-131 w

CD M M Dissolved and 1xl0 5 I z

Grab Sample 'Entrained Gases (A

U--

W Grab Sample M

Composite d

H-3 lxl10- I I X10-7 a-Gross Alpha I

W Q Sr-89, Sr-90 5x0"8

-LJ 0

0 ,

Grab Sample Composite 1xl0 6 I ry

_A 03 Fe-55 D

U-"

C) ta-I (A Page 30 of 155

Q Salem ODCM Rev. 22 TABLE 4.11-1 (Continued)

TABLE NOTATION

a. The LLD is defined, for purposes of these CONTROLS as the smallest concentration of radioactive material in a sample that will yield a net count (above system background) that Iwil be, detected with 95% probability with only 5% probability of falsely concluding that a blank observation represents a "real" signal.

For a particular measurement system (which may include radiochemical separation):

LLD= 4.66*Sb'

E

V

2.22E6

Y

exp(-2At)

Where:

LLD is the "a priori" lower limit of detection as defined above (as microcuries per unit mass or volume),

4.66 is the statistical, factor from NUREG 1301 Sb is the standard deviation of the background counting rate or of the counting rate of a blank W sample as appropriate.(as counts per minute),

- E is the counting efficiency (as counts per disintegration),

Z*

<* V is the sample size (in units of mass or volume),

D

2.22E6 is the number of disintegrations per minute per microcurie, Ii 2"

Y is the fractional radiochemical yield (when applicable),

0X is the radioactive decay constant for the particular radionuclide, and c* At for environmental samples is the elapsed time between sample collection (or end of the Z* sample collection period) and time of counting.

Typical values of E, V, ý, and At should be used in the calculation.

aY 0 It should be recognized that the LLD is defined as an a prioi_(before the fact) limit representing the capability of a measurement system and not as an a posteriori (after the fact) limit for a particular measurement.

I° IJ Page 31 of 155

Salem ODCM Rev. 22 I I TABLE 4.11-1 (Continued)

TABLE NOTATION I

b. A batch release is the discharge of liquid wastes Of a discrete volume. Prior to sampling for I analyses, each batch shall be isolated, and then thoroughly mixed to assure representative sampling.

I

c. The principal gamma emitters for which the LLD CONTROL applies exclusively are the following radionuclides: Mn-54, Fe-59, Co-5.8, Co-60, Zn-65, Mo-99, Cs-134, Cs-137, Ce-141, and Ce-144*. This list does not mean that only these nuclides are to be detected and I

reported. Other peaks that are measurable and identifiable, together with the above nuclides; shall also be identified and reported.

I

d. A composite sample is one in which the quantity of liquid sampled is proportional to the quantity of liquid waste discharged and in which the method of sampling employed results in a specimen that is representative of the liquids released. I

e. A continuous release is the discharge of liquid wastes of a nondiscrete volume, e.g., from a volume of a system that has an input flow during the continuous release. I I

V)

C/)~

2ý I

0 C-;

0 I

The LLD for Ce-144 shall be 2x10-6 g4i/ml. I I-Pae3 o 5 I

z V) I CL zy I

S

-LJ V)

D

Salem ODCM Rev. 22 3/4.11 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS 3/4.11.1.2 DOSE CONTROLS 3.11.1.2 In accordance with Salem Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications 6.8.4.g.4 and 5, the dose or dose commitment to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC from radioactive materials in liquid effluents released, from each reactor unit, to UNRESTRICTED AREAS (see Figure 5.1-3) shall be limited:

a. During any calendar quarter to less than or equal to 1.5 mrem to the total body and to less than or equal to 5 mrem to any organ, and

b. During any calendar year to less than or equal to 3 mrem to the total body and to less than or equal to 10 mrem to any organ.

APPLICABILITY: At all.times.

ACTION:

a. With the calculated dose from the release of radioactive materials in liquid effluents I O exceeding any of the above limits, prepare and submit to the Commission within 30 Vdays, pursuant to Technical Specification 6.9.2, a Special Report that identifies the cause(s) for exceeding the limit(s) and defines the corrective actions that have been

<taken to reduce the releases and the proposed corrective actions to be taken to assure that o subsequent releases will be in compliance with the above limits.

< b. The provisions of CONTROL 3.0.3 and 3.0.4 are not applicable.

('1 2)

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 0 4.11.1.2 Cumulative dose contributions from liquid effluents shall be determined in accordance with F) the ODCM at least once per 31 days.

z2 IP.1 0

U-Pae3 o 5

I I

Salem ODCM Rev. 22 a

3/4.11 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS I

3/4.11.1.3 LIQUID RADWASTE TREATMENT I

CONTROLS 3.11.1.3 In accordance with the Salem Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications 6.8.4.g.6, the liquid I radwaste treatment system shall be used to reduce the radioactive materials liquid wastes prior to their discharge when the projected cumulative doses due to the liquid effluent from each reactor to UNRESTRICTED AREAS (see Figure 5.1-3) exceed 0.375 mrem to the total body or 1.25 mrem to I any organ during any calendar quarter.

APPLICABILITY: At all times. I ACTION:

I

a. With the radioactive liquid waste being discharged without treatment and in excess of the above limits, prepare and submit to the Commission within 30 days, pursuant to Technical Specification 6.9.2, a Special Report that includes the following information:

I Explanation of why liquid radwaste was being discharged without treatment, V) 1.

identification of any-inoperableequipment or subsystems, and the reason for the I

W inoperability.

z 0

2. Action(s) taken to restore the inoperable equipment to OPERABLE status, and I C)

3. Summary description of action(s) taken to prevent a recurrence.

I 0 b. The provisions of CONTROL 3.0.3 and 3.0.4 are not applicable.

I SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 0z U-4.11.1.3 Doses due to liquid releases-shall be projected at least once per.31 days in accordance with I the ODCM.

I 0

I_J I

.w 0_

CD I n

60 W I Page 34 of 155 I

I IO Salem ODCM Rev. 22

'. 3/4.11 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS 3/4.11.2 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS 3/4.11.2.1 DOSE RATE I CONTROLS I3.11.2.1 In accordance with the Salem Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications 6.8.4.g.3 and 7, the dose rate due to radioactive materials released in gaseous effluents from the site to areas at and.

beyond the SITE BOUNDARY (see Figure 5.1-3) shall be limited to the following:

a. For noble gases: Less than or equal to 500 mrem/yr to the total body and less than or equal to 3000 mrem/yr to the skin, and

b. For iodine-1 31, for tritium, and for all radionuclides in particulate form with half lives greater than 8 days: Less than or equal to 1500 mrem/yr to any organ.

I APPLICABILITY: At all times.

ACTION:

I*

I With the dose rate(s) exceeding the above limits, without delay restore the release rate to, within the above limit(s).

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS U 4.11.2.1.1 The dose rate due to noble gases in gaseous effluents shall be determined continuously to 1be within the above limits in accordance with the ODCM.

>,'Y 4.11.2.1.2 The dose rate due to iodine-131, tritium, and all radionuclides in particulate form with t~da:half lives greater than 8 days in gaseous effluents shall be determined to be within the above limits in I ~

accordance with the ODCM by obtaining representative samples and performing analyses in accordance with the sampling and analysis program specified in Table 4.11-2.

0 I°!

tLJ zve 1)3 W ~. Page 35ofl155

I Salem ODCM Rev. 22 TABLE 4.11-2: RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS WASTE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PROGRAM I Gaseous Release Minimum Lower Limit of Detection I

Sampling Analysis Type of Activity (LLD)

Type Frequency Frequency Analysis (ACi/ml)

A. Waste Gas P P I

Each Tank Each Tank Principal Gamma 1xl 0-4 Storage Tank Grab Spiple _ _ _ Emittersb I B. Containment P P Principal Gamma 1x0-4 PURGE Each PURGE Grab Sample Each PURGE Emittersb I 1xl 0-6 C. Plant Vent Mc'de H-3 .

Gamma IPrincipal 0x-4 I Grab Sample Mc Emittersb H-3 1xl10"6 I S D. All Release Types as Continuousf Wg Charcoal 1-13.1 Ixl0"'2 I

Li, Listed in A, Sample (5

B, and C Above Continuousf Wg Principal Gamma 1x 1011 I

Particulate Emitters" 0

z 0

0 Sample (1-131, Qthers) I Continuousf M Gross Alpha 1xl0"ll Composite Particulate

, I 0 Sample z

U-w/

I h 1 0

Continuousf Q Composite Particulate Sr-89, Sr-90 'x10,'

I w

0I i0i Continuousf Sample Noble Gas Noble Gasses 1x10"6 I CD 0> Monitor Gross Beta or w Gamma U-_

0..

D_ I Page 36 of 155 I

Salem ODCM Rev. 22 TABLE 4.11-2 (Continued)

TABLE NOTATION

a. The LLD is defined in Table 4.11.1

b. The principal gamma emitters for which the LLD CONTROL applies exclusively are the followinrgradionuclides: Kr-87, Kr-88, Xe-133, Xe-133m, Xe-135, Xe-138 for gaseous I emissions and Mn-54, Fe-59, Co-58, Co-60, Zn-65, Mo-99, Cs-134, Cs-137, Ce-141 and Ce-144 for particulate emissions. This list does not mean that only these nuclides are to be detected and reported. Other peaks that are measurable and identifiable, together with the above nuclides, shall also be identified and reported.

c. Sampling and analysis shall also be performed following shutdown, startup or a THERMAL I POWER change that, within one hour, exceeds 15 percent of RATED THERMAL POWER unless:

1. Analysis shows that the DOSE EQUIVALENT 1-131 concentration in the primary coolant has not increased more than a factor of three; and

- 2. The noble gas activity monitor shows that effluent activity has not increased by more than a factor of three.

0 2' d. Tritium grab samples shall be taken at least once per 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months when 0the refueling canal is flooded.

e. Tritium grab samples shall be taken at least once per 7 days from the ventilation exhaust from 0the spent fuel pool area whenever spent fuel is in the spent fuel pool.

f. The ratio of the sample flow rate to the sampled stream flow rate shall be known for the time 0period covered by each dose or dose rate calculation made in accordance with CONTROLS 0 3.11.2.1, 3.11.2.2*and 3.11.2.3.

> g. Samples shall be changed at least once per 7 days and analyses shall be completed within 48 hours5.555556e-4 days 0.0133 hours 7.936508e-5 weeks 1.8264e-5 months after changing (or after removal from sampler). Sampling shall also be performed at least once per 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months for at least 7 days following each shutdown, startup or THERMAL POWER

,_ change that, within one hour, exceeds 15 percent of RATED THERMAL POWER and analyses shall be completed within 48 hours5.555556e-4 days 0.0133 hours 7.936508e-5 weeks 1.8264e-5 months of changing. When samples collected for 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months

> are analyzed, the corresponding LLDs may be increased by a factor of 10. This requirement r" does not apply if (1) analysis shows that the DOSE EQUIVALENT 1-131 concentration in the primary coolant has not increased more than a factor of 3; and (2) the noble gas monitor shows that effluent activity has not increased by more than- a factor of three.

U V) Page 37 of 155

I I

Salem ODCM Rev. 22 SP 3/4.11 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS I 3/4.11.2.2 DOSE - NOBLE GASES I

CONTROLS 3.11.2.2 In accordance with the Salem Units 1 and 2 Technical Specification 6.8.4.g.5 and 8, the air I dose due to noble gases released in gaseous effluents, from each reactor unit, from the site areas and beyond the SITE BOUNDARY (see Figure 5.1-3) shall be limited to the following:

I

a. During any calendar quarter: Less than or equal to 5 mrad for gamma radiation and less than or equal to 10 mrad for beta radiation and, I

b. During any calendar year: Less than or equal to 10 mrad for gamma radiation and less than or equal to 20 mrad for beta radiation.

i APPLICABILITY: At all times.

ACTION: I

a. With the calculated air dose from radioactive noble gases in gaseous effluents exceeding any of the above limits, prepare and submit to the Commission within 30 days, pursuant I Cn to Technical Specification 6.9.2, a Special Report that identifies the cause(s) for r

exceeding the limit(s) and defines the corrective actions that have been taken to reduce the release and the proposed corrective actions to be taken to assure that subsequent releases will be in compliance with the abovelimits.

I D

b. The provisions of CONTROLS 3.0.3 and 3.0.4 are not applicable. I

-7 z

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS I 0 4.11.2.2 Cumulative dose contributions for the current calendar quarter and current calendar year shall be determined in accordance with the ODCM at least once per 31 days. i C1 I

0 I

I I

-J crc U-Vi)

D Page 38 of 155 I

I I0 Salem ODCM Rev. 22 3/4.11 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS 3/4.11.2.3 DOSE - IODINE-131. TRITIUM. AND RADIONUCLIDES IN PARTICULATE FORM CONTROLS 3.11.2.3 In accordance with the Salem Units 1 and 2 Technical Specification 6.8.4.g.5 and 9, the dose to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC from iodine-131, from tritium, and from all radionuclides in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days in gaseous effluents released, from each reactor unit, from the site to areas at and beyond the SITE BOUNDARY (see Figure 5.1-3) shall be limited to the following:

a. During any calendar quarter: Less than or equal to 7.5 mrem to any organ and,

b. During any calendar year: Less than or equal-to 15 mrem to any organ.

APPLICABILITY: At all times.

ACTION:

a. With the calculated air dose from the release'of iodine-131, tritium, and radionuclides in I* particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days, in gaseous effluents exceeding any of the above limits, prepare and submit to the Commission within 30 days, pursuant to Technical Specification 6.9.2, a Special Report that identifies the cause(s) for exceeding the limit and defines the corrective actions that have been taken to reduce the release and the proposed corrective actions to be taken to assure that subsequentreleases will be in compliance with the above limits.

b. The provisions of CONTROLS 3.0.3 and 3.0.4 are not applicable.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.11.2.3 Cumulative dose contributions for the current calendar quarter and current calendar year for iodine- 131, tritium, and radionuclides in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days shall 0 be determined in accordance with the ODCM at least once per 31 days.

>~i 7-zL 1+/-

0 Page. 39 of 155

I Salem ODCM Rev. 22 3/4.11 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS 3/4.11.2.4 GASEOUS RADWASTE TREATMENT CONTROLS 3.11.2.4 In accordance with the Salem Units I and 2 Technical Specifications 6.8.4.g.6, the GASEOUS RADWASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM and the VENTILATION EXHAUST TREATMENT SYSTEM shall be used to reduce radioactive materials in gaseous waste prior to their discharge when the projected gaseous effluent air doses due to gaseous effluent releases, from the site to areas at and beyond the SITE BOUNDARY (see Figure 5.1-3), exceed 0.625 mrad for gamma radiation and 1.25 mrad for beta radiation in any calendar quarter. The VENTILATION EXHAUST TREATMENT SYSTEM shall be used to reduce radioactive materials in gaseous waste prior to their discharge when the projected doses due to gaseous effluent releases, from each reactor unit, from the site to areas at and beyond the SITE BOUNDARY (see Figure 5.1-3).would exceed 1.875 mrem to any organ in any calendar quarter. I APPLICABILITY: At all times.

ACTION:

a. With gaseous waste being discharged without treatment and in excess of the above limits, prepare and submit to the Commission within 30 days, pursuant to Technical 0 Specification 6.9.2, a SpecialReport that includes the following information:

I7

- 1. Explanation of why gaseous radwaste was being discharged without treatment, identification of any inoperable equipment or subsystems, and the reason for the inoperability. o D 2. Action(s) taken to restore the inoperable equipment to OPERABLE status, and V) z" 3. Summary description of action(s) taken to prevent a recurrence.

0

b. The provisions of CONTROLS 3.0.3 and 3.0.4 are not applicable.

lad

_I z_

-__ SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS i> 4.11.2.4 Doses due to gaseous releases from the site shall be projected at least once per 31 days in 0 accordance with the ODCM.

1.*_

0 I

(I" Page 40 of 155

Salem ODCM Rev. 22 3/4.11 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS 3/4.11.4 TOTAL DOSE CONTROLS 3.11.4. In accordance with Salem Units I and 2 Technical Specification s 6.8.4.g. 11, the annual (calendar year) dose or dose commitment to any MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC, due to releases of radioactivity and radiation, from uranium fuel cycle sources shall be limited to less than or equal to 25 mrem to the total body or any organ (except the thyroid, which shall be limited to less than or equal to 75 mrem).

APPLICABILITY: At all times ACTION:

a. With the calculated doses from the release of radioactive materials in liquid or gaseous effluents exceeding twice the limits of CONTROL 3.11.1.2a, 3.11.1.2b, 3.11.2.2a, 3.11.2.2b, 3.11.2.3a, or 3.11.2.3b, calculations should be made including direct radiation contributions from the reactor units and from outside storage tanks to I. determine:.whether the limits of this CONTROL have been exceeded. -if such is the case, prepare and submit to the Commission within 30 days, pursuant to Technical Specification 6.9.2, a Special Report that defines the corrective action to be taken to z reduce subsequent releases to prevent recurrence of exceeding the above limits and

<includes the schedule for achieving conformance with the above limits. This Special Report, as defined in 10 CFR Part 20.405c, shall include an analysis that estimates the z radiation exposure (dose) to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC from uranium fuel cycle

< sources, including all effluent pathways and direct radiation, for the calendar year that Dincludes the release(s) covered by this report. It shall also describe levels of radiation I< and concentrations of radioactive material involved, and the cause of the exposure

')levels or concentrations. If the estimated dose(s) exceeds the above limits, and if the 2ý release condition resulting in violation of 40 CFR Part 190 or,10 CFR 72.104 has not

-0 already been corrected, the Special Report shall include a request for a variance in

>accordance with the provisions of 40 CFR Part 190 and 10 CFR 72.104. Submittal of the report is considered a timely request, and a variance is granted until staff action on (D the request is complete.

o_ b. The provisions of CONTROLS 3.0.3 and 3.0.4 are not applicable.

I 0 U-SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS

_jU. 4.11.4.1 Cumulative dose contributions from liquid and gaseous effluents shall be determined in c* accordance with CONTROLS 4.11.1.2, 4'11.2.2, 4.11.2.3, and in accordance with the ODCM.

radwaste

0) 4.11.4.2 Cumulative dose contributions from direct radiation from the reactor units and from storage shall be determined in accordance with the ODCM.

Page 41 of 155

m Salem ODCM Rev. 22 3/4.12 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING 1 3/4.12.1 MONITORING PROGRAM I CONTROLS 3.12.1. In accordance with Salem Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications 6.8.4.h. 1, the radiological environmental monitoring program shall be conducted as. specified in Table 3.12-1.

I APPLICABILITY: At all times.

ACTION:

a. With the radiological environmental monitoringprogram not being conducted as specified in Table 3.12-1, prepare and submit to the Commission, in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report required by Technical Specification 6.9.1.7, a description of the reasons for not conducting the program as required and the plans for preventing a recurrence.

b. 'With the level of radioactivity as the result of plant effluents in an environmental sampling medium at a specified location exceeding the reporting levels of Table 3.12-2 when averaged over any calendar quarter, prepare and submit to the Commission within Li. 30 days, pursuant to Technical Specification 6.9.2, a Special Report that identifies the z0 cause(s) for exceeding the limit(s) and defines the corrective actions to be taken to

-r reduce radioactive effluents so that the potential annual dose* to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC is less than the calendar year limits of CONTROLS 3.11. 1.2, 3.11 2.2, and z 3.11.2.3. When more than-one of the radionuclides in Table 3.12-2 are detected in the

< sampling medium, this report shall be submitted if:.

V)

H---

V) concentration (1) concentration (2) 1.0

_ reporting level (1) reporting level (2).

Li, When radionuclides other than those in Table 3.12-2 are detected and are the result of plant effluents, this report shall be submitted if the potential. annual dose* to a

- MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC from all radionuclides is equal to or greater than the' calendar year limits of CONTROLS 3.11.1.2, 3.11.2.2, and 3.11.2.3. This report is not required if the measured level of radioactivity was not the result of plant effluents; however, in such an event, the condition shall be reported and described in the Annual 0 Radiological Environmental Operating Report pursuant to CONTROL 6.9.1.7.

_I

_ *The methodology used to estimate the potential annual dose to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC o shall be indicated in this report.

-V" Page 42 of 155

Salem ODCM Rev. 22 I

3/4.12 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING 3/4.12.1 MONITORING PROGRAM CONTROLS ACTION: (Cont'd)

c. With milk or fresh leafy vegetable samples unavailable from one or more of the sample locations required by Table 3.12-1, identify specific locations for obtaining replacement samples and add them to the radiological environmental monitoring program within 30 days. The specific locations from which samples were unavailable may then-be deleted from the monitoring program.

Pursuant to Technical Specification 6.9.1.8, identify the cause of the unavailability of samples and the new location(s) for obtaining replacement samples in the next Radioactive Effluent Release Report. Include in the report a revised figure(s) and table for the ODCM reflecting the new location(s).

d. The provisions of CONTROLS 3.0.3 and 3.0.4 are not applicable.

lO SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (Y) 4.12.1 The radiological environmental monitoring samples shall be collected pursuant to Table 3.12-1 from the specific locations given in the table and figure(s) in the ODCM, and shall be 0

analyzed pursuant to the requirements of Table 3.12-1, and the detection capabilities required by Cr Table 4.12-1.

U-z I0 La_

iUo Ld_

F2 Page 43 of 155

USER RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING REVISION, STATUS AND CHANGES Salem ODCM Rev. 22 TABLE 3.12.1-1: RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

EXPOSURE PATHWAY NUMBER OF REPRESENTAIVE SAMPLING AND TYPE AND FREQUENCY AND/OR SAMPLE SAMPLES AND SAMPLE COLLECTION OF ANALYSIS LOCATIONS . FREQUENCY

1. DIRECT RADIATION (2) Forty-nine routine monitoring Quarterly Gamma dose quarterly stations with two or more dosimeters placed as follows:

An inner ring of stations one in each land based meteorological sector (not bounded by water) in the general area of the SITE BOUNDARY; An outer ring of stations, one in each land-based meteorological sector in the 5 to 11-km range from the site (not boundedby or over water); and The balance of the stations to be placed in special interest areas such as population centers, nearby residences, schools, and in one or two areas to serve as control stations.

The number, media, frequency, and location of samples may vary from site to site. This table presents an acceptable minimum program for a site at which each, entry is applicable. Local..site characteristics must be examined to determine if pathways not covered by this table may significantly contribute to an individual's dose and should be included in the sample program.

Page 44 of 155 m m - - m-m m-n -m n -m- - m-m -m m -m

M M n M-- M nMmm- M- M M M MM USER RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING REVISION, STATUS AND CHANGES Salem ODCM Rev. 22 TABLE 3.12.1-1 (Cont'd)

RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM EXPOSURE PATHWAY NUMBER OF REPRESENTAIVE SAMPLING AND TYPE AND FREQUENCY AND/OR SAMPLE SAMPLES AND SAMPLE COLLECTION OF ANALYSIS LOCATIONS () FREQUENCY

2. AIRBORNE Radioiodine and Particulates Samples from 6 locations: Continuous sampler Radioiodine Canister 1-131 operation with sample analysis weekly.

collection weekly or more frequently if required by dust loading.

4 Samples - One sample from close Particulate Sampler Gross beta to the SITE BOUNDARY location radioactivity analysis following and three samples in different land filter change (3) based sectors of a high calculated annual average ground level D/Q One sample from the vicinity of a Gamma isotopic analysis(4) of community having a high calculated composites (by location) annual average ground- level D/Q; quarterly.

and One sample from a control location, as for example 15-30 km distant and in the least prevalent wind direction.

Page 45 of 155

USER RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING REVISION, STATUS AND CHANGES 0

Salem ODCM Rev. 22 TABLE 3.12.1-1 (Cont'd)

RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM EXPOSURE NUMBER OF SAMPLING AND TYPE AND FREQUENCYOFANALYSIS PATHWAY REPRESENTAIVE SAMPLES COLLECTION AND/OR SAMPLE AND SAMPLE-LOCATIONS (1) FREQUENCY

3. WATERBORNE

a. Surface(5 ) One sample upstream Grab sample monthly Gamma isotopic analysis(4) monthly. Composite One sample downstream for tritium analysis quarterly.

One sample outfall One sample cross-stream

b. Ground Samples from one or two sources Monthly Gamma isotopic analysis(4) monthly and tritium 7 ).

only if likely to be affected~ analysis quarterly.

c. Drinking (10) One sample of the nearest water Composite sample 1-131 analysis on each composite when the dose supply affected by its discharge over two-week calculated for the consumption of the water is period(6) when 1-131 greater than I mrem per year s). Composite for analysis is performed; gross beta and gamma isotopic analysis(4) monthly composite monthly Composite for tritium analysis quarterly otherwise.

d. Sediment One sample mfrom downstream area Semiannually Gamma isotopic analysis(4) semiannually One sample from cross-stream area One sample from outfall area One sample from upstream area One sample from a control location One sample from shoreline area One sample from Cooling Tower Blowdown

1 -1 -- 1- Page 46 of 155 1----1- - 1---

M- m M n-M- M- M-- M M M MM m USER RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING REVISION, STATUS AND CHANGES.

Sl0 R Salem ODCM Rev. 22 TABLE 3.12.1-1 (Cont'd)

RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM EXPOSURE PATHWAY NUMBER OF REPRESENTAIVE SAMPLING AND TYPE AND FREQUENCY AND/OR SAMPLE SAMPLES AND SAMPLE COLLECTION OF-ANALYSIS LOCATIONS () FREQUENCY

4. INGESTION

a. Milk Samples from milking animals in Semimonthly when animals Gamma isotopic (4)and 1-131 three locations within 5 km distance are on pasture, monthly at analysis semi-monthly when having the highest dose potential. If other time animals are on pasture; monthly there are none, then, one sample at other times from milking animals in each of three areas between 5 to 8 km distant where doses are calculated to be greater than I mrem per yr~ 8 ).

One sample from milking animals at

a. control location 15 to 30 km distant.

b. Fish and Invertebrates One sample of each commercially Sample in season, or Gamma isotopic analysis(4) on and recreationally important species semiannually if they are not edible portions..

in vicinity-of plant discharge area seasonal One sample of same species in area not influenced by plant discharge.

Page 47 of 155

0*

USER RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING REVISION, STATUS AND CHANGES 0

Salem ODCM Rev. 22 TABLE 3.12.1-1 (Cont'd)

RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM EXPOSURE PATHWAY NUMBER OF SAMPLING AND TYPE AND FREQUENCY AND/OR SAMPLE REPRESENTAIVE COLLECTION OF-ANALYSIS SAMPLES AND SAMPLE FREQUENCY *1 LOCATIONS (1)

c. Food Products One sample of each principal At time of harvest (9) Gamma isotopic analysis (4)on class of food products from any edible portion.

area that is irrigated by water in which liquid plant wastes have been discharged Page 48 of 155

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -M- -

Salem ODCM Rev. 22 TABLE 3.12. 1-1 (Continued)

TABLE NOTATION (1) Specific parameters of distance and direction sector from the centerline of one reactor, and additional description where pertinent, shall be provided for each and every sample location in Table 3.12-1 in a table and figure(s) in the ODCM. Refer to NUREG-0133, "Preparation of Radiological Effluent Technical Specifications for Nuclear Power Plants," October 1978, and to Reg. Guide 4.8 as amended by Radiological Assessment Branch Technical Position, Revision 1,November 1979. Deviations are permitted from the required sampling schedule if specimens are unobtainable due to circumstances such as hazardous conditions, seasonal unavailability, malfunction of automatic sampling equipment, and other legitimate reasons. If specimens are unobtainable due to sampling equipment malfunction, effort shall be made to complete corrective action prior to the end of the next sampling period. All deviations from the sampling schedule shall be documented in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report pursuant to CONTROL 6.9.1.7. It is recognized that, at times, it may not be possible or practicable to continue to obtain samples of the media of choice at the most desired location or time.

In these instances suitable specific alternative media and locations may be chosen for the particular pathway in question and appropriate substitutions made within 30 days in the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program given in the ODCM. Pursuant to CONTROL 6.9.1.8, submit in the next Radioactive Effluent Release Report documentation for a change in the ODCM including revised figure(s) and table for the ODCM reflecting the new location(s) with supporting information identifying the cause of the unavailability of samples for the pathway and justifying the selection of the new

< location(s) for obtaining samples.

C.Z

<* (2) One or more instruments, such as pressurized ion chamber, for measuring and recording

<)dose rate continuously may be used in place of, or in addition to, integrating dosimeters.

DFor the purposes of this table, a Dosimeter of Legal Record (DLR) is considered to be one phosphor; two or more phosphors in a packet are considered as two or more dosimeters. Film badges shall'not be used for measuring direct radiation. The frequency Z" of analysis or readout will depend upon the characteristics of the specific dosimetry Usystem used and should be selected to obtain optimum dose information with minimal W fading. No direct radiation monitoring stations are located in the inner ring sectors 8, 9, ry 12, 13 and 14 and the outer ring sector 8 as originally determined. during plant licensing and as permitted by Reg. Guide 4.8 as amended by The Branch Technical Position Revision 1, November 1979.

> (3) Airborne particulate sample filters shall be analyzed for gross beta radioactivity 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months Q:ý 0 or more after sampling to allow for radon and thoron daughter decay. If gross beta activity in air particulate is greater than ten times the yearly mean of control samples,

_J gamma isotopic analysis shall be performed on the individual samples.

(4) Gamma isotopic analysis means the identification and quantification of gamma-emitting radionuclides that may be attributable to the effluents from the facility.

VPage 49 of 155

Salem ODCM Rev. 22 TABLE 3.12.1-1 (Continued)

TABLE NOTATION (5) The "upstream sample" shall be taken at a distance beyond significant influence of the discharge. The "downstream" sample shall be taken in an area beyond but near the mixing zone. "Upstream." samples in an estuary must be taken far enough upstream to be beyond the plant influence. Saltwater shall be sampled only when the receiving water is utilized. for recreational activities. . ..

(6) A composite sample is one which the quantity (aliquot) of liquid sampled is proportional to the quantity of flowing liquid and in which the method of sampling employed results I in a specimen that is representative of the liquid flow. In this program composite sample aliquots shall be collected at time intervals that are very short relative to the compositing period in order to assure obtaining a representative sample.

(7) Groundwater samples shall be taken when this source is tapped for drinking or irrigation purposes in areas where the hydraulic gradient or recharge properties are suitable for contamination.

(8) The dose shall be calculated for the maximum organ and age group, using the V) methodology and parameters in the ODCM. Additionally, 2 sample locations are 0" monitored as management audit. Broad leaf vegetation may be obtained in lieu of milk

-Z collections.

C-)

(9) If harvest occurs more than once a year, sampling shall be performed during each discrete

<z harvest. If harvest occurs continuously, sampling shall be monthly. Attention shall be paid to including samples of tuberous and root, food products. The Delaware River at the location of Salem and Hope Creek Nuclear Power Plants is a brackish water source. No irrigation of food products is performed using water in the vicinity from which liquid

. plant wastes have been discharged. However, 12 management audit food samples are 2" collected from various locations.

(10) No groundwater samples are required as liquid effluents discharged from Salem and ry Hope Creek Generating Stations do not directly affect this pathway. However for

_o management audit, one raw and one treated ground water sample from the nearest unaffected water supply is required.

0,I

..-J Z-U-I 0

(A "5

Page 50 of 155 DI

m -

m 11 m m m- m m m- -

USER RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING REVISION, STATUS AND CHANGES Salem ODCM Rev. 22 TABLE 3.12-2: REPORTING LEVELS FOR RADIOACTIVITY CONCENTRATIONS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLES REPORTING LEVELS Water Airborne Particulate Fish Milk Food Products Analysis (pCi/l) or Gases (pCi/m3) (pCi/Kg, wet) (pCi/l) (pCi/Kg, wet)

H-3 3 x 10 Mn-54 I x 101 3 x 10' Fe-59 4x 102 1 x 104 Co-58 I x 101 3 x 104 Co-60 3 x 10' 1 x 104 Zn-65 3 x 102 2x104 Zr-Nb-95 4 x 102 1-131 20 0.9 3 1 x 102 Cs-134 30 10 1 x 103 60 1 x 103 Cs-137 50 20 2 x 103 70 2 x 103 Ba-La-140 2 x 102 _3 x 10 W2 Page 51 of 155

USER RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING REVISION, STATUS AND CHANGES 0 0 Salem ODCM Rev. 22 it TABLE 4.12-1: DETECTION CAPABILITIES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLE ANALYSIS(0' 2( )

LOWER LIMITS OF DETECTION (LLD) (3)

Water Airborne Particulate Fish Milk Food Products Sediment Analysis. (pCi/1) or Gases (pCi/m3) (pCi/Kg, wet) (pCi/l) (pCi/Kg, wet) (pCi/Kg, dry) gross 4 1 x 10-2 beta H-3 3000 Mn-54 15 130 Fe-59 30 260 Co-58,60 15 130 Zn-65 30 260 Zr-Nb-95 15 1-131 10 7x 102 1 60 Cs-134 15 5 x 102 130 15 60 150 Cs-137 18 6 x 10-2 150 18 80 180 Ba-La-140 15 15 Page 52 of 155

- m- m m- m - - - - - - - -m m- m m- m m- m

Salem ODCM Rev. 22 TABLE 4.12-1 (Continued)

TABLE NOTATION (1) This list does not mean that only these nuclides are to be considered. Other peaks that are identifiable, together with those of the above nuclides, shall also be analyzed and reported in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report pursuant to CONTROL 6.9.1.7.

(2) Required detection capabilities for thermoluminescent dosimeters used for environmental measurements shall be in accordance with the recommendations of Regulatory Guide 4.13.

(3) The LLD is defined, for purposes of these CONTROLS as the smallest concentration of radioactive material in a sample that will yield a net count, above system background, that will be detected with 95% probability with only 5% probability of falsely concluding that a blank observation represents a "real" signal.

For a particular measurement system, which may include radiochemical separation:

1 LLD= 4.66 *Sb E, V

2.22E6 e Y

exp(-2At)

Z Where:

0LLD is the "a priori" lower limit of detection as defined above (as picocuries per unit mass or

O Hz volume),

4.66 is the statistical factor from NUREG 1301 (A

Sb is the standard deviation of the background counting rate or of the counting rate of a blank V) sample as appropriate (as counts per minute),

£ E is the counting efficiency (as counts per disintegration),

_) V is the sample size (in units of mass or volume),

2.22 is the number of disintegrations per minute per picocurie, Z Y is the fractional radiochemical yield (when applicable),

.X is the radioactive decay constant for the particular radionuclide, and

> At for environmental samples is the elapsed time between sample collection (or end of the o sample collection period) and time of counting.

Typical values of E, V, Y, and At should be used in the calculation.

~Page Peo 53 of 155

I Salem ODCM Rev. 22 I S TABLE 4.12-1 (Continued)

TABLE NOTATION I

It should be recognized that the LLD is defined as an a nriori (before the fact) limit representing the I

capability of a measurement system and not as an a posteriori (after the fact) limit for a particular measurement. Analyses. shall be performed in such a manner that the stated LLDs will be achieved under routine conditions. Occasionally background fluctuations, unavoidable small sample sizes I

the presence of interfering nuclides, or other uncontrollable circumstances may render these LLDs unachievable. In such cases, the contributing factors shall be identified and described in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report pursuant to CONTROL 6.9.1.7.

I V)

Uj1 0 I 0

Lj.

Z I

V) n-rK-I z* I I

I c2W 0

U-I ci)

I

. Page 54 of 155 I

Salem ODCM Rev. 22 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING 3/4.12.2 LAND USE CENSUS CONTROLS 3.12.2. In accordance with the Salem Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications 6.8.4.h.2, a land use census shall be conducted and shall identify within a distance of 8 km (5 miles) the location in each of the 16 meteorological sectors of the nearest milk animal, the nearest residence and the nearest garden*

of greater than 50 m2 (500 ft2) producing broad leaf vegetation.

APPLICABILITY: At all times.

ACTION:

a. With a land use census identifying a location(s) that yields a calculated dose or dose commitment greater than the values currently being calculated in CONTROL 4.11.2.3, identify the new location(s) in the next Radioactive Effluent Release Report, pursuant to CONTROL 6.9.1.8.

V) b. With a land use census identifying a location(s) that yields a calculated dose or dose Wa commitment (via the same exposure pathway) 20 percent greater than at a location from 7° which samples are currently being obtained in accordance with CONTROL 3.12.1, add the new location(s) to the radiological environmental monitoring program within 30 days.

The sampling location(s), excluding the control station location, having the lowest az calculated dose or dose commitment(s), via the same exposure pathway, may be deleted

< from this monitoring program after October 31 of the year in which this land use census D was conducted. Pursuant to CONTROL 6.9.1.8, identify the.new location(s) in the next

< Radioactive Effluent Release Report and also include in the report a revised figure(s) and

'table for the ODCM reflecting the new location(s).

I c. The provisions of CONTROLS 3.0.3 and 3.0.4 are not applicable.

Id

Broad leaf vegetation sampling of at least three different kinds of vegetation may be performed at the,

,~ SITE BOUNDARY in each of two different direction sectors with the highest predicted D/Q in lieu of

> the garden census. CONTROLS for broadleaf vegetation sampling in Table 3.12-1.4c shall be followed, r?,

0 including analysis of control samples.

Ii, MI D

Page 55 of 155

Salem ODCM Rev. 22 I

3/4.12 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING I

a 3/4.12.2 LAND USE CENSUS (Cont'd) I SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.12.2 The land use census shall be conducted during the growing season at least once per 12 months I

using that information that will provide the best results, such as by a door-to-door survey, visual survey, aerial survey, or by consulting local agriculture authorities. The results of the land use census shall be included in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report pursuant to CONTROL 6.9.1.7.

I I

I S I C3 I

V-)

CD

(.9 L/)

Zý 0(-

I I

5 r-3 I z0 U-(A I

I 0

w

>-J I D,

0 Page 56 of 155 I

Di I

Salem ODCM Rev. 22 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING I* 3/4.12.3 INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM CONTROLS 3.12.3 In accordance with Salem Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications 6.8.4.h.3, analyses shall be performed on radioactive materials supplied as part of an Interlaboratory Comparison Program.

APPLICABILITY: At all times.

ACTION:

a. With analyses not being performed as required above, report the corrective actions taken to prevent a recurrence to the Commission in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report pursuant to CONTROL 6.9.1.7.

b. The provisions of CONTROLS 3.0.3 and 3.0.4. -are not applicable.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS

1. 4.12.3 The Interlaboratory Comparison Program shall be described in the ODCM. A summary of the results obtained as part of the above required Interlaboratory Comparison Program shall be included in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report pursuant to CONTROL 6.9.1.7.

V-)

D 0

Page 57 of 155

Saldm ODCM Rev. 22 0 I I

BASES FOR SECTIONS 3.0 AND 4.0

.CONTROLS AND SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS NOTE I

0 The BASES contained in the succeeding pages summarize V) 7 the reasons for the CONTROLS of Sections 3.0 and 4.0, 0

but are not considered a part of these CONTROLS.

0U--

m.'

U-

<:D I

012W n

0 I

U--

U, 0_

Page 58 of 155

Salem ODCM Rev. 22 3/4.3 INSTRUMENTATION I. BASES 3/4.3.3.8 RADIOACTIVE LIQUID EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION The radioactive liquid effluent instrumentation is provided to monitor and control, as applicable, the releases of radioactive materials in liquid effluents during actual or potential releases of liquid effluents.

The alarm/trip'setpoints for these instruments shall be calculated and adjusted in accordance with the procedures in the ODCM to ensure that the alarm/trip will occur prior to exceeding the limits of 10 CFR Part 20. The OPERABILITY and use of this instrumentation is consistent with the requirements of General Design Criteria 60, 63, and 64 of Appendix A to 10 CFR Part 50.

CROSS REFERENCE - TABLES 3.3-12 and 4.3-12 Unit 1:

T/S Table Item No. Instrument Description Acceptable RMS Channels 1a Liquid Radwaste Effluent Line Gross I R18 Activity _

I. lb Steam Generator Blowdown Line Gross Activity 1R19A, B, C, and D()

LU 2a Containment Fan Coolers Service IR13A and B(')

Water Line Discharge Gross Activity Unit 2:

C-)

T/S Table Item No. Instrument Description, Acceptable RMS Channels Ui) la Liquid Radwaste Effluent Line Gross 2R1 8

> Activity lb Steam Generator Blowdown Line 2R19A,B,C, Gross Activity and D(1)

LU 2a- Containment Fan Coolers - Service" 2R13A and B(')

Water Line Discharge Gross Activity _

U-2b Chemical Waste Basin Line Gross' R371 0 Activity U-MID) (1) The channels listed are required to be operable to meet a single operable channel for the ODCM's "Minimum Channels Operable" requirement.

Page 59 of 155

Salem ODCM Rev. 22 I

3/4.3 INSTRUMENTATION I S BASES I

3/4.3.3.9 RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORING.INSTRUMENTATION The radioactive gaseous effluent instrumentation is provided to monitor and control,. as applicable, the I

releases of radioactive materials in gaseous effluents during actual, or potential releases of gaseous effluents. The alarm/trip setpoints for these instruments shall be calculated and adjusted in accordace with the procedures in the ODCM to ensure that the alarm/trip will occur priorto exceeding ihe linjits I

of 10 CFR Pait 20. The OPERABILITY and use of this instrumentation is consistent with the.

requirements of General Design Criteria 60, 63, and 64 of Appendix A to 10 CFR Part 5.0. I CROSS REFERENCE - TABLES 3.3-13 and 4.3-13 Unit 1:

I T/S Table Item No. Instrument Description Acceptable RMS Channels I

la Waste Gas Holdup System Noble Gas Activity IR41A andD (1)(2)

I 2a Containment Purge and 1R12A Pressure - Vacuum Relief Noble Gas Activity or

~1R41A and D !)2 I

-)

3a Plant Vent Header System Noble Gas Activity 1R41A and D (1)(2) I 0

0 3b Plant Vent Header System Iodine Sampler (3) 1RME 4, 5 (1R41) or I

H--

Ld H--

z 3c Plant Vent Header System 1XT8911 (1R45) 1RME 4, 5 (1R41)

I 0

Particulate Sampler (3)

or IXT8911 (1R45)

I Zm z

U-0 (1) The channels listed are required to be operable to meet a single operable channel for the ODCM's "Minimum Channels. Operable" requirement..

I Uv-0.JA (2) 1R41D is the setpoint channel. 1R41A is themeasurement channel. I (3) Laboratory analysis of the sampler filters ensures that the limits of ODCM CONTROL 3.11.2.1 I

i, are not exceeded. Alarm/trip setpoints do not apply to these passive components.

rv.

0.

W 0v" 0

U-/ Page 60 of 155 I

I

Salem ODCM Rev. 22 3/4.3 INSTRUMENTATION 1I0 BASES.

Unit 2:

T/S Table Instrument Description Acceptable RMS Item No. Channels Ia Waste Gas Holdup System Noble Gas Activity 2R41A and D()(2ý 2a Containment Purge and Pressure - Vacuum Relief 2R12A or 2R41A Noble Gas Activity and D(1)2) 3a Plant Vent Header System Noble Gas Activity 2R41A and D(') 2) 3b Plant Vent Header System Iodine Sampler (3) RME 4, 5 (2R41) or

_2XT8911 (2R45) 3c Plant Vent Header System Particulate Sampler (3) 2RME 4, 5 (2R41) or 2XT8911 (2R45)

(1) The channels listed are required to be operable to meet a single operable channel for Io the ODCM's "Minimum Channels Operable" requirement.

(2) 2R41D is the setpoint channel. 2R41 A is the measurement channel.

(3) Laboratory analysis of the sampler filters ensures that the limits of ODCM CONTROL 3.11.2.1 are not exceeded. Alarm/trip setpoints do not apply to these passive components.

z 0U 0

Page 61 of 155

I Salem ODCM Rev. 22 3/4.11 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS .

BASES 3/4.11.1 LIQUID EFFLUENTS I 3/4.11.1.1 CONCENTRATION The CONTROL is provided to ensure that the concentration of radioactive materials released in liquid waste effluents will be less than the concentration levels specified in 10 CFR Part 20, Appendix B Table II, Column 2. This limitation provides additional assurance that the levels of radioactive materials in bodies of water in UNRESTRICTED AREAS will result in exposures within (1) the Section II.A design objectives of Appendix I, 10 CFR Part 50, to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC and (2) the limits of 10 CFR Part 20.106(a) to the population. The concentration limit for dissolved or entrained noble gases is based upon the assumption that Xe-135 is the controlling radioisotope and its MPC in air (submersion) was converted to an equivalent concentration in water using the methods described in International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) Publication 2.

The required detection capabilities for radioactive materials in liquid waste samples are tabulated in terms of the lower limits of detection (LLDs).

3/4.11.1.2 DOSE 0

I This CONTROL is provided to implement the requirements of Sections II.A, III.A, and IV.A of Appendix 1. 10 CFR Part 50. The CONTROL implements the guides set forth in Section II.A of Appendix I. The ACTION statements provide the required operating flexibility and at the same time

- implement the guides set forth in Section IV.A of Appendix I to assure that the releases of radioactive material in liquid effluents will be kept "as low as is reasonably achievable." Also, for freshwater sites

-7 with drinking water supplies that can be potentially affected by plant operations, there is reasonable assurance that the operation of the facility will not result in radionuclide concentrations in the finished D drinking water that are in excess of the requirements of 40 CFR Part 141. The dose calculations in the

-< ODCM implement the requirements in Section III.A of Appendix I that conformance with the guides of V Appendix I be shown by calculational procedures based on models and data, such that the actual

z exposure of a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC through appropriate pathways is unlikely to be substantially

_ underestimated. The equations specified in the ODCM for calculating the doses due to the actual release rates of radioactive materials in liquid effluents are consistent with.the methodology provided in

R'egulatory Guide 1.109, "Calculation of Annual Doses to Man from Routine Releases of Reactor

__ Effluents for the Purpose of Evaluating Compliance with 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix I," Revision 1, October 1977 and Regulatory Guide 1.113, "Estimating Aquatic Dispersion of Effluents from Accidental and Routine Reactor Releases for the Purposes of Implementing Appendix I," April 1977.

ry The CONTROL applies to the release of liquid effluents from each reactor at the site. For units with 0

U" shared radwaste treatment systems, the liquid effluents from the shared system are proportioned among

". the units sharing that system.

DI

Salem ODCM Rev. 22 iD RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS BASES 3/4.11.1.3 LIQUID RADWASTE TREATMENT The requirement that the appropriate portions of this system be used, when specified, provides assurance that the releases of radioactive materials in liquid effluents will be kept "as low as is reasonably achievable". This CONTROL implements the requirements of 10 CFR Part 50.36a, General Design Criterion 60 of Appendix A to 10 CFR Part 50 and the design objective given in Section II.0 of Appendix I to 10 CFR Part 50. The specified limits governing the use of appropriate portions of the liquid radwaste treatment system were specified as a suitable fraction of the dose design objectives set forth the Section II.A of Appendix I, 10 CFR Part 50, for liquid effluents.

i 3/4.11.2 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS 3/4.11.2.1 DOSE RATE This CONTROL is provided to ensure that the dose-at any time at and beyond the SITE BOUNDARY from gaseous effluents from all units on the site will be within the annual dose limits of 10 CFR Part

20. The annual dose limits are the doses associated with the concentrations of 10 CFR Part 20, Appendix B, Table II, Column 1. These limits provide reasonable assurance that radioactive material discharged in gaseous effluents will not result in the exposure of a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC either within or outside the SITE BOUNDARY, to annual average concentrations exceeding the limits I* specified in Appendix B, Table II of 10 CFR Part 20 [10 CFR Part 20.106(b)]. For MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC who may at times be within the SITE BOUNDARY, the occupancy of the individual will usually be sufficiently low to compensate for any increase in the atmospheric diffusion factor I ~

above that for the SITE BOUNDARY. Examples of calculations for such MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC with the appropriate occupancy factors shall be given in the ODCM. The specified release rate limits restrict, at all times, the corresponding gamma and beta dose rates above background to. a V)* MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC at or beyond the SITE BOUNDARY to less than or equal to 500 I< mrem/year to the whole body and 3000 mrem/yr to the skin. These release rate limits also restrict, at all times, the corresponding thyroid dose rate above background to a child via the inhalation pathway to less than or equal to 1500 mremlyear.

> This CONTROL applies to the release of gaseous effluents from all reactors at the site.

I Q 3/4.11.2.2 DOSE- NOBLE GASES This CONTROL is provided to implement the requirements of Section II.B, III.A and IV.A of I ~ Appendix i, 10 CFR Part 50. The CONTROL implements the guides set forth in Section II.B of Appendix I. The ACTION statements provide the required operating flexibility and at the same time implement the guides set forth in Section IV.A of Appendix I to assure that the releases of radioactive zco IRequirements material in gaseous effluents will be kept "as low as is reasonably achievable." The Surveillance implement the requirements in Section III.A of Appendix I that conformance with the guides of Appendix I be shown by calculational procedures based on models and data such that the 0n actual exposure of a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC through appropriate pathways is unlikely to be V)-P ry Page 63 of 155

I Salem ODCM Rev. 22 I

. RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS BASES 1 substantially underestimated. The dose calculations established in the ODCM for calculating the doses due to the actual release rates of radioactive noble gases in gaseous effluents are consistent with the methodology provided in Regulatory Guide 1.109, "Calculation of Annual Doses to Man from Routine Releases of Reactor Effluents for the Purpose of Evaluating Compliance with 10 CFR 50, Appendix I,"

Revision I, October 1977 and Regulatory Guide 1.111, "Methods for Estimating Atmospheric Transport and Dispersion of Gaseous Effluents in Routine Releases from Light-Water Cooled Reactors," Revision 1, July 1977. The ODCM equations provided for determining the air doses at and beyond the SITE BOUNDARY are based upon the historical average atmospheric conditions.

3/4.11.2.3 DOSE - IODINE-13 1, TRITIUM, AND RADIONUCLIDES IN PARTICULATE FORM This CONTROL is provided to implement the requirements of Section II.C, III.A and IV.A of Appendix I, 10 CFR Part 50. The CONTROL are the guides set forth in Section ll.C of Appendix I. The ACTION statements provide the required operating flexibility and at the same time implement the guides set forth in Section IV.A of Appendix I to assure that the releases of radioactive material in gaseous effluents will be kept "as low as is reasonably achievable." The ODCM calculational methods specified in Surveillance Requirements implement the requirements in Section III.A of Appendix I that conformance with the guides of Appendix I be shown by calculational procedures based on models and data*such that the actual exposure of a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC through appropriate pathways is unlikely to be substantially underestimated. The ODCM calculational methods for calculating:the doses due to the actual release rates of the subject materials are consistent with the methodology provided in Regulatory Guide 1.109, "Calculation of Annual Doses to Man from Routine Releases of Reactor z<* Effluents for the Purpose of Evaluating Compliance with 10 CFR 50, Appendix I," Revision 1, October

- 1977 and Regulatory Guide 1.111, "Methods for Estimating Atmospheric Transport and Dispersion of Gaseous Effluents in Routine Releases from Light-Water Cooled Reactors," Revision 1, July 1977.

z

'D These equations also provide for determining the actual dose based upon the historical average atmospheric conditions. The release rate controls for iodine- 131, tritium, and radionuclides in particulate form with half-life greater than 8 days are dependent on the existing radionuclide pathways I

to man in the areas at and beyond the SITE BOUNDARY. The pathways that were examined in the development of these calculations were: 1) individual inhalation of airborne radionuclides, 2) I deposition of radionuclides onto green leafy vegetation with subsequent consumption by man, 3)

- deposition onto grassy areas where milk animals and meat producing animals graze with consumption

_/I

>* of the milk and meat by man, and 4) deposition on the ground with subsequent exposure of man.

o z_

arK-3/4.11.2.4 GASEOUS RADWASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM The requirement that the appropriate portions of this system be used, when specified, provides I

r.

,.° reasonable assurance that the releases of radioactive materials in gaseous effluents will be kept "as low as is reasonably achievable." This CONTROL implements the requirements of 10 CFR Part 50.36a, General Design Criterion 60 of Appendix A to 10 CFR Part 50 and the design objectives given in I

,Section II.0 of Appendix I to 10 CFR Part 50. The specified limits governing the use of appropriate 0~

m portions of the systems were specified as a suitable fraction of the dose design objectives set forth in Section II.B and II.C of Appendix I, 10 CFR Part 50, for gaseous effluents.

Page 64 of 155, DI Vi)

Salem ODCM Rev. 22

- RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS BASES 3/4.11.4 TOTAL DOSE This CONTROL is provided to meet the dose limitations of 40 CFR Part 190 that have now been incorporated into 10 CFR Part 20 by 46 FR 18525 as well as the dose limitations specific to Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) operations in accordance with 10 CFR 72.104.

Over the long term, as more storage casks are placed on the ISFSI pads, it is expectedthat ISFSI operations will become the prominent contributor to the dose limits in this section. ISFSI dose contribution is n the form of direct radiation as no liquid or gas releases are expected to occur. The PSEG 10 CFR 72.212 Report prepared in accordance with 10 CFR 72 requirements assumes a certain array of casks exists on the pads. The dose contribution from this array of casks in combination with historical uranium fuel cycle operations prior to ISFSI operations was analyzed to be within the 40 CFR 190 and 10 CFR72.104 limits. The CONTROL requires the preparation and submittal of a Special Report whenever the' calculated doses from plant including the ISFSI radioactive effluents exceed 25 mrem to the total body or any organ, except the thyroid, which shall be limited to less than or equal to 75 mrem. For sites containing up to 4 reactors, it is highly unlikely that the resultant dose to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC will exceed the dose limits of 40 CFR Part 190 if the individual reactors remain within twice the dose design objectives of Appendix I, and if direct radiation doses from the reactor units including outside storage tanks, etc. are kept I

small. The Special Report will. describe a course of action that should result in the limitation of the annual dose to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC to within the 40 CFR Part 190 or 10 CFR 72.104 limits. For purposes of the Special Report, it may be assumed that the dose commitment to the V) MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC from other uranium fuel cycle sources is negligible, with the

D exception that dose contributions from other nuclear fuel cycle facilities at the same site or within a

< radius of 8 km must be considered. If the dose to any MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC is estimated to exceed the requirements of"40 CFR Part 190 or 10 CFR *7 04, the Special Report with a request for a variance (provided the release conditions resulting in violation of 40 CFR Part 190 or 10 CFR

< 72.104 have not already been corrected), in accordance with the provisions of 40 CFR Part 190 or If) 10 CFR 72.104 and 10 CFR Part 20.405c, is considered to be a timely request and fulfills the

< requirements of 40 CFR Part 190 or 10 CFR 72.104 until NRC staff action is completed. The

<CI variance only relates to the limits of 40 CFR Part 190 or.1.0 CFR 72.104, and does not apply in any way to the other requirements for dose limitation of 10 CFR Part 20, as addressed in CONTROLS o 3.i1.1 and 3.11.2. An individual is not considered a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC during any period in which he/she is engaged in carrying out any operation that is part of the nuclear fuel td cycle.

Ii, U-Uv-n0 ry Page 65 of 155

Salem ODCM Rev. 22 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS I BASES 3/4.12 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING 3/4.12.1 MONITORING PROGRAM The radiological environmental monitoring program required by this CONTROL provides measuremenits'of radiation and of radioactive materials in those exposure pathways and for those radionuclides that lead to the highest potential radiation exposu res of MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC resulting from the station operation. This monitoring program implementsSection IV.B.2 of Appendix I to 10 CFR Part 50 and thereby supplements the radiological effluent monitoring program by verifying that the measurable concentrations of radioactive materials and levels of radiation are not higher than expected on the basis of the effluent measurements and the modeling of the environmental exposure pathways. The initial specified monitoring program will be effective for at ieast the first three years of commercial operation. Following this period, program changes may be initiated based on operational experience.

The LLDs required by Table 4.12-1 are considered optimum for routine environmental measurements in industrial laboratories. It should be recognized that the LLD is defined as an a riori (before the fact) limit representing the capability of a measurement system andnot as an a posteriori (after the fact) limit for a particular measurement. .

3/4.12.2 LAND USE CENSUS

< This CONTROL is provided to ensure that changes in the use of areas at and beyond the SITE

-T- BOUNDARY are identified and that modifications to the radiological environmental monitoring program are made if required by the results of this census. The best information from the door-to-door

< survey, aerial survey or consulting with local agricultural authorities shall be used. This census satisfies V) the requirements of2Section IV.B.3 of Appendix Ito 10 CFR Part 50. Restricting the censui' to gardens of greater than 50m provides assurance that significant exposure pathways via leafy vegetables will be I---since a garden of this size is, the minimum required to produce the quantity'(26 identified and monitored 0 kg/year) of leafy vegetables assumed in Regulatory Guide 1.109 for consumption by a child. To 2" determine this minimum garden size, the following assumptions were made:' 1) 20% of the garden was v

wL >I used for growing broad leaf vegetation (i.e., similar to lettuce and cabbage), and 2) yield of 2 k 3/4.12.3 INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM This requirement for participation in an Interlaboratory Comparison Program is provided to ensure that independent checks on the precision and accuracy of the measurements of radioactive material in environmental sample matrices are performed as part of the quality assurance program for environmental monitoring in order to demonstrate that the results are reasonably valid for the purposes of Section IV.B.2 of Appendix I to 10 CFR Part 50.

a-coo rya Page 66 of 155 Lj Cn

Salem ODCM Rev. 22 SECTION 5.0 DESIGN FEATURES i

io

('3 z

14 z".)

i-*

0

0 a-0!

Page 67 of 155

I Salem ODCM Rev. 22 I

5.0 DESIGN FEATURES 5.1 SITE I

5.1.3 UNRESTRICTED AREAS FOR RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS AND LIQUID EFFLUENTS I UNRESTRICTED AREAS within the SITE BOUNDARY that are accessible to MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC, shall be as shown in Figure 5.1-3. (Provided FOR INFORMATION ONLY. Technical Specifications Section 5.0 is controlling.)

I I

I S"i 03 w

I)

Z0 03 212

ý5 0

1 0

0 I w

L" z.

I r0 r0" w

0, I

ry I

0~

wD W

-A I

03 Page 68 of 155 I

Rev. 22 I sITE Salem ODCM PLOT PLAN OF I FIGURE 5.1-3: AREA I*

I .-.

i I

I N -i i

I-i I ...

I I r~n i i.

I I I I L 3

I 1 LC5

,.2~

I>

!z CAI N iCj Fo

4 I I-sz Lj i Gi~f~ -/

a-.1 , EA ADELAVa.RERIVE kI I;4 155 Page 69 of

I Salem ODCM Rev. 22 6.0 ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS U 1 6.9.1.7 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT 6.9.1.7 In accordance with Salem Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications 6.9.1.7, The Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report* covering the operation of the unit during the previous calendar year shall be submitted prior to May 1 of each year.

The Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Reports shall include summaries, interpretations, I and an analysis of trends of the results of the radiological environmental surveillance activities for the report period, including a4comparison with preoperational studies with operational controls (as appropriate), and with previous environmental surveillance reports, and an assessment of the observed impacts of the plant operation on the environment. The reports shall also include the results of land use censuses required by CONTROL 3.12.2. The Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Reports shall include the results of analysis of all radiological environmental samples and of all measurements .

taken during the period pursuant to the Table and Figures in the environmental radiation section of the ODCM; as well as summarized and tabulated results of locations specified in these analyses and measurements in the format of the table in Reg. Guide 4.8 as amended by Radiological Assessment Branch Technical Position, Revision 1, November 1979. In the event that some individual results are not available for inclusion with the report, the report shall be submitted noting and explaining the reasons for the missing results. The missing data shall be submitted as soon as possible in a supplementary report.

The reports shall also include the following: a summary description of the radiological environmental monitoring program; at least two legible maps, one covering sampling locations near the SITE 0 BOUNDARY and a second covering the more distant locations, all keyed to a table giving distances C and directions from the centerline of one reactor; the results of-licensee participation in the

< Interlaboratory Comparison Program, required by CONTROL 3.12.1; and discussion of all analyses in C)which the LLD required by Table 4.12-1 was not achievable.

Z

< 6.9.1.8 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT RELEASE REPORT 6.9.1.8 In accordance with Salem Units 1 and.2 Technical Specifications 6.9.1.8, The Annual 0* Radiological Effluent Release Report* covering the operation of the unit during the previous calendar 0_ year shall be submitted prior to May 1 of each year. and in accordance with the requirements of 10CFR50.36a.

The Radioactive Effluent Release Report shall include a summary of the quantities of radioactive. liquid 3 and gaseous effluents and solid waste released from the unit as outlined in Regulatory Guide 1.21.

-Z "Measuring, Evaluating, and Reporting Radioactivity in Solid Wastes and Releases of Radioactive Materials in Liquid and Gaseous Effluents from Light-Water-Cooled Nuclear Power Plants," Revision I

1, June 1974, with data summarized on.a quarterly basis following the format of Appendix B thereof.

A single submittal may be made for a multiple unit station. The submittal should combine those

_j sections that are common to all units at the station; however, for units with separate radwaste SImsystems, the submittal shall specify the releases of radioactive material from each unit.

0~

0 i~ic*Page 70 of 155 I

~I

Salem ODCM Rev. 22

- 6.9.1.8 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT RELEASE REPORT (Continued)

The Radioactive Effluent Release Report shall include an annual summary, of hourly meteorological data collected over the previous year. This annual summary may be either in the form of an hour-by-hour listing of magnetic tape of wind speed, wind direction, atmospheric stability, and precipitation (if measured), or in the form of joint frequency distributions of wind speed, wind direction, and atmospheric stability. The repoft shall include an assessment of the radiation doses'due to the radioactive liquid and gaseous effluents released from the unit or station during the previous calendar year. The report shall also include an assessment of the radiation doses from radioactive liqufid and gaseous effluents to MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC due to their activities inside the SITE BOUNDARY (Figure 5.1-3) during the report period. All assumptions used in making these assessments (i.e., specific activity, exposure time and location) shall be included in these reports. The historical annual average meteorology or the meteorological conditions concurrent with the time of release of radioactive materials in gaseous effluents (as determined by sampling frequency and measurement) shall be used

-for determining the gaseous pathway doses. The assessment, of radiation doses shall be performed in accordance with the OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL.

The Radioactive Effluent Release Report shall identify those radiological environmental sample, parameters and locations where it is not possible or practicable to continue to obtain samples of the media of choice at the most desired location or time. In addition, the cause of the unavailability of samples for the pathway and'the niew location(s) for obtaining replacement samples should be identified. The report should also include a revised figure(s) and table(s) for the ODCM reflecting the new location(s).

-The Radioactive Effluent Release Report shall also include an assessment of radiation doses to the likely most exposed MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC from reactor releases and other nearby uranium fuel

cycle sources (including doses from primary effluent pathways, and direct radiation) for the previous calendar year to show conformance with 40 CFR Part 190, Environmental Radiation'Protection Standards for Nuclear Power Operation and .10 CFR 72.104, Criteria for Radioactive Materials in

,, Effluents and Direct Radiation from an ISFSI or MRS. Acceptable methods for calculating the dose 0

contribution from liquid and gaseous effluents are given in Regulatory Guide 1.1091 Rev. 1, October

< 1977.

I The Radioactive Effluent Release Reports shall include the following information for each class of solid waste (as defined by 10 CFR Part 61) shipped offsite during the report period:

D a. Container volume,.

Ib. Total curie quantity .(specify-whether determined by measurement or estimate),

0 c. Principal radionuclides (specify whether determined by measurement or estimate),

w d. Source. of waste, and processing employed (e.g., dewatered spent resin, compacted dry waste, evaporator bottoms),

- e. Type of container (e.g., LSA, Type A, Type B, Large Quantity), and

>2f. Solidification agent or absorbent (e.g., cement, urea formaldehyde).

0 I ui The Radioactive Effluent Release. Report shall include a list of descriptions of unplanned releases from

the site to UNRESTRICTED AREAS of radioactive materials in gaseous and liquid effluents.made during the reporting period.

l

" Page 71 of 155

Salem ODCM Rev. 22 6.9.1.8 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT RELEASE REPORT (Continued). I The Radioactive'Effluent Release Report shall include any changes made during the reporting period to the PROCESS CONTROL PROGRAM. (PCP), the OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL (ODCM), or radioactive waste sytems. Also list new locations identified by the land use census pursuant to CONTROL 3.12.2. for dose calculations or environmental monitoring.

6.15 MAJOR CHANGES TO RADIOACTIVE LIQUID, GASEOUS AND SOLID WASTE TREATMENT SYSTEMS:

6.15.1 Licensee initiated major changes to the radioactive'waste system (liquid, gaseous and solid)

UFSAR for the period in which the

1. Shallbe reported to the Commission in the evaluation was reviewed by the Plant Operations Review Committee (PORC). The discussion of each change shall contain:

a. A summary of the evaluation that ledto the determination that the change' could be made in accordance'with 10CFR50.59"

b. Sufficient detailed information to totally support the reason for the change without.benefit of additional or supplemental information;

c. A detailed description of the equipment, components and processes involved and1the interfaces with other plant systems; I 0

z d. An evaluation of the change, which shows the predicted releases of radioactive materials in liquid and gaseous effluents and/or quantity of solid waste that differ from those previously predicted in the license application and amendments thereto"

e. An evaluation of the change, which shows the expected maximum exposures to individual in the unrestricted area and to. the general population that differ from those previously estimated in the license application and amendments thereto;

> f. A comparison of the predicted releases of radioactive materials, in liquid and

"] gaseous effluents and in solid waste, to the actual releases for the period prior

(.5 towhen the changes are to be made;'

w.g. An estimate of the exposure to plant operating personnel. as a result of the change; and

.I 0

U- h. Documentation of the fact that the change was reviewed and found acceptable

'by the PORC.

2. Shall become effective upon review and acceptance by the PORC.

0 a:

Pe 7I Page 72 of 155*

D12 I

Salem ODCM Rev. 22 0

. PART II - CALCULATIONAL METHODOLOGIES ln I.,d w

Q")

C/)

I*-

ci)

La_

0 U-1%j

©'

l*n L.d.

Page 73 of 155

Salem ODCM Rev. 22 I

I

. 1.0 LIQUID EFFLUENTS 1.1 Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation and Controls '

The liquid effluent monitoring instrumentation and controls at Salem for controlling and monitoring normal radioactive material releases in accordance with the Salem Technical Specifications 6.8.4.g and.ODCM CONTROLSare summarized as follows:

1) Alarm (and Automatic Termination) RI8 (Unit 1) and 2-R18 (Unit 2) provide the alarm and automatic termination of liquid radioactive material releases as required by ODCM CONTROL 3.3.3.8.

1-R19 A, B, C, and D provide the alarm and isolation function for the Unit 1 steam generator blowdown lines. 2-R19 A, B, C, and D provide this function for Unit 2. I

2) Alarm (only) - The alarm functions for the Service Water System are provided by the radiation monitors on the Containment Fan Cooler discharges (IR 13 A and B for Unit 1 and 2R 13 A and B for Unit 2).

Releases from the secondary system are routed through the Chemical Waste Basin where the I effluent is monitored (with an alarm function) by R37 prior to release to the environment.

Liquid radioactive release flow diagrams with the applicable, associated radiation monitoring I co"' instrurrentation and controls are presented as Figures 1-1 and 1-2 for Units 1 and 2, respectively. The z Liquid Radioactive Waste System is presented in Figure 1-3.

oI 7a 1.2 Liquid Effluent Monitor Setpoint Determination DIn Per the requirements of ODCM CONTROL 3.3.3.8, alarm setpoints shall be established for the liquid

<- effluent monitoring instrumentation to ensure that the release concentration limits of ODCM

<n CONTROL 3.11.1.1 are met (i.e., the concentration of radioactive material released in liquid effluents 2ý to UNRESTRICTED AREAS shall be limited to the concentrations specified in 10 CFR 20, Appendix.

o B, Table II, Column 2, (Appendix F) for radionuclides and 2.OE-04 ýiCi/ml for dissolved or entrained

>m noble gases).

The following equation* must be satisfied to meet the liquid effluent restrictions:

C(F + f)

,w c_ (1.1) f .N 0o Where:

L_

C = the effluent concentration limit of ODCM CONTROL 3.11.1.1 implementing the 10 O CFR 20 MPC (Appendix F) for the site, in jtCi/mnl o c = the setpoint, in p.Ci/ml, of the radioactivity monitor measuring the radioactivity 0.

Li concentration in the effluent line prior to dilution and subsequent release; the setpoint, ay I~I .Page 74 of 155 n1 LI) ta~I

Salem ODCM Rev. 22 *

- represents a value which, if exceeded, would result in concentrations exceeding the limits of 10 CFR 20 (Appendix F) in the UNRESTRICTED AREA I f the flow rate at the radiation monitor location, in volume per unit time, but in the same units as F, below F = the dilution water flow rate as measured prior to the release point, in volume per unit I time I+ [Note

+f) that if no dilution is provided, c < C. Also, note that when (F) is large compared to (f), then (F

=F.]

Adapted from NUREG-0133 1.2.1 Liquid Effluent Monitors (Radwaste, Steam Generator Blowdown, Chemical Waste Basin and Service Water.

The setpoints for the liquid effluent monitors at the Salem Nuclear Generating Station are determined by the following equations:

SP ,[MPCe*SEN*CW *CF*AF]+bkg (1.2)

I I* with:

'.d Ci (gamma only)

MPCe Ci (1.3) hrpi M(gamma only)

F Where:

U')

<* SP = alarm setpoint corresponding to the maximum allowable release rate (cpm)

MPCe = an effective MPC value for the mixture of gamma emitting radionuclides in the effluent 2" stream (gCi/ml).

0 Ci = the concentration of radionuclide i in the undiluted liquid effluents (gCi/ml)

> MPCi = the M-PC Value corresponding to radionuclide i from 10 CFR 20, Appendix B, Table II, ry Column 2 (Appendix F) (GCi/ml)

CD SEN = the sensitivity value to which the monitor is calibrated (cpm per IiCi/ml)

Scw = the circulating water flow rate (dilution water' flow) at the time of release (gal/min)

LtrP RR = the liquid effluent release rate (gal/min)

> bkg = the background of the monitor (cpm)

CF = Correction factor to account for non-gamma emitting nuclides in setpoint calculations.

0 AF = an allocation factor applicable for steam generator blowdown

The radioactivity monitor setpoint equation (1.2) remains valid during outages when the circulating 0 water dilution is potentially at its lowest value. Reduction of the waste stream flow (RR) may be necessary during these periods to meet the discharge criteria. However, in order to maximize the Page 75 of 155

Salem ODCM Rev. 22 available plant discharge dilution and thereby minimize the potential offsite doses, batch releases from p either Unit-I or Unit-2 may be routed to either the Unit-i or Unit-2 Circulating Water System discharge. Procedural restrictions prevent simultaneous batch releases from either a single unit or both units into a single Circulating Water System discharge.

1.2.2 Conservative Default Values Conservative alarm setpoints may be determined through the use of default parameters. Tables I-1.1 and 1-1.2 summarize all current default values in use for Salem Unit-i and Unit-2, respectively. They are based upon the following:

a) substitution of the effective MPC value with a default value of 6.05E-06 gCi/ml .(Unit 1) and 4.8 1E-06 pLCi/ml (Unit 2). (refer to Appendix A forJustification);

b) for additional conservatism*, substitution of the 1-131 MPC value of 3E-07 gCi/mI for the R19 Steam Generator Blowdown monitors, the R-37 Chemical Waste Basin monitor and the R- 13 Service Water monitors; c) for conservatism, use of an allocation factor of 0.5 for the Steam Generator Blowdown monitors to limit consequences of potential simultaneous primary-to-secondary leaks in two steam generators.** The allocation factor equals 1.0 for all liquid effluent setpoints; d) substitutions of the operational circulating water flow with the lowest flow, in gal/min;***

e) substitutions of the effluent release rate with the highest allowed rate, in gal/min; and, f) -substitution of a Correction factor of 0.75 to account for non-gamma emitting nuclides.

For batch liquid releases a fixed alarm setpoint is established for the 1, 2 R18 monitors and the release rate is controlled to ensure the inequality of equation 1.1 is maintained. With this approach, values selected for the parameters in the setpoint calculation (e.g., Table I-1.1 and Table 1-1.2) should be any z set of reasonable values that provide a setpoint value reasonably above anticipated monitor response,

< plus background, so as not to yield spurious alarms. The release rate is controlled to ensure compliance 0 with the requirements of ODCM CONTROL 3.3.3.8.

Calculations, as performed by Engineering, to establish the actual fixed setpoints for use in the plant, incorporate uncertainties and instrument drift. These factors will cause the actual installed instrument setpoint to be at a lower (conservative) value.' However, for batch releases, when the rate is controlled,

.0 these uncertainties and drift should not be included in the evaluation of acceptable release rate, since 2" this could cause a non-conservative correction, i.e., a higher allowable release rate. Therefore, for 1, 2 0_ RI 8 monitors, the setpoint value used for calculating the allowable release rate should be that value.

> prior to correction for uncertainty and drift.

0 Based upon the potential for 1-131 to be present in the secondary and service water systems, the use of the default effective MPC (MPCe) value as derived in Appendix A may be non-conservative for the 1, 2 R-19 SGBD monitors, the R-37 Chemical Waste Basin monitor and w> the R-13 Service Water monitors.

- Setpoints using the Allocation Factor of 0.5. become invalid if primary-to-secondary leaks are 0

W

__j identified in more than two steam generators simultaneously. 1 In ***The Containment Fan Coil Unit Discharge to Service Water Line is routed to the-opposite n Unit's Circulating Water System discharge. Therefore, during periods when circulating I cI Page 76 of 155 wj

D

Salem ODCM Rev. 22 water pumps are out of service, such as during refueling outages, the default setpoints of the other Unit's R13 radiation monitors are not valid.

1.3 Liquid Effluent Concentration Limits - 10 CFR 20 ODCM CONTROL 3.11.1.1 limits the concentration of radioactive material in liquid effluents (after dilution in the Circulating Water System) to less than the concentrations as specified in 10 CFR 20, H Appendix B, Table II, Column 2 (Appendix F) for radionuclides other-than noble gases. Noble gases are limited to a diluted concentration of 2.OE-04 ptCi/ml.

Release rates are controlled and radiation monitor alarm setpoints are established as addressed above to ensure that these concentration limits are not exceeded. However, in the event any liquid release results in an alarm setpioint being exceeded, an evaluation of compliance with the concentration limits of ODCM CONTROL 3.11.1.1 may be performed using the following equation:

I. ~ci< (1.4)

S(MPG CW+RR<

Where:

Ci = actual concentration of radionuclide i as measured in the undiluted liquid effluent (pCi/ml)

MPC = the MPC value corresponding to radionuclide i from 10 CFR 20, Appendix B, Table I, W Column 2 (ptCi/ml) [ODCM Appendix F]

w = 2E-04 ý.Ci/ml for dissolved or entrained noble gases z RR = the actual liquid effluent release rate (gal/min)

CW = the actual circulating water flow rate (dilution water flow) at the time of the release (gal/min)

Cn 1.4 Liquid Effluent Dose Calculation - 10 CFR 50 I< 1.4.1 MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC Dose - Liquid Effluents.

V) z" ODCM CONTROL 3.11.1.2 limits the dose or dose commitment to MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC

_0 from radioactive materials in liquid effluents from each unit of the Salem Nuclear Generating Station U>

U to:

- during any calendar quarter; Z < 1.5 mrem to total body per unit

_, < 5.0 mrem to any organ per unit o during any calendar year;

< 3.0 mrem to total body per unit Le <10.0 mrem to any organ perPunit. o I* Page 77 of 155

Salem ODCM Rev. 22 I

Per the surveillance requirements of ODCM CONTROL 4.11.1.2, the following calculational methods S shall be used for determining the dose or dose commitment due to the liquid radioactive effluents from I

Salem:

1.67E-02*VOL DoCW t*Ai 0) (1.5)

I I

Where:

D. dose or dose commitment to organ o (mrem). Total body dose.can also be calculated I

using site-related total body dose commitment factor.

Ajo = site-related ingestion dose commitment factor to the total body or any organ o for radionuclide i (mrem/hr per ptCi/ml)

I Ci = average concentration of radionuclide i, in undiluted liquid effluent representative of the VOL =

volume VOL (pCi/ml) volume of liquid effluent released (gal)

I CW = average circulating water discharge rate during release period (gal/min) 1.67E-02 = conversion factor (hr/min)

I The site-related ingestion dose/dose commitment factors (Ai,) are presented in Table 1-2 and have been derived in accordance with the requirements ofNUREG-0133 by the equation:

I A =1.14E +05* LI 777Jý (1.6)

I 0

Where:

z 0

Ai. = composite dose parameter for the total body or critical organ o of an adult for radionuclide i, for the fish and invertebrate ingestion pathways (mrem/hr per gCi.ml)

I 0LUJ UI = adult invertebrate consumption (5 kg/yr)

CD BI . = bioaccumulation factor for radionuclide i in invertebrates from Table 1-3 (pCi/kg per pCi/l)

I UF = adult fish consumption (21 kg/yr) z*

BFj =

DFio =

bioaccumulation factor for radionuclide i in fish from Table 1-3 (pCi/kg per pCi/1) dose conversion factor for nuclide i for adults in pre-selected organ, o, from Table E-1 1 I

U) of Regulatory.Guide 1.109 (mrem/pCi)

LUd 0

1.1 4E+05 = conversion factor (pCi/ptCi

ml/kg per hr/yr) I The radionuclides included in the periodic dose assessment per the requirements of ODCM CONTROL 0

U--

0 LU~

3/4.11.1.2 are those as identified by gamma spectral analysis of the liquid waste samples collected and analyzed per the requirements of ODCM CONTROL 3/4.11.1.1, Table 4.11-1.

I CD 0~

0a Radionuclides requiringradiochemical analysis (e.g., Sr-89 and Sr-90) will beadded to the dose analysis at a frequency consistent with the required minimum analysis frequency of ODCM CONTROL I

Table 4. i 1-1.

I LU

-U 0

D Page 78 of 155

Salem ODCM Rev. 22 U 1.4.2 Simplified Liquid Effluent Dose Calculation.

S In lieu of the individual radionuclide dose assessment as presented in Section 1.4.1, the following simplified dose calculation equation may be used for demonstrating compliance with the dose limits of ODCM CONTROL 3.11.1.2. (Refer to Appendix B for the derivation and justification for this I simplified method.)

Total Body IDtb= 1.21E ++/-03*VOL (17i (1.7)

CW Maximum Organ Dmax 2.52E +04*VOL (.

cw (1.8)

Where:

Ci = average concentration of radionuclide i, in undiluted liquid effluent representative of the volume VOL (iCi/ml)

VOL = volume of liquid effluent released (gal)

CW = average circulating water discharge rate during release period (gal/min)

I V) Dtb Dmax

= conservatively evaluated total body dose (mrem)

= conservatively evaluated maximum organ dose (mrem)

I .1.21 E+03 = conversion factor (hr/min) and the total body dose conversion factor (Fe-59, total body

-- 7.27E+04 mrem/hr per jtCi/ml) 2.52E+04 conversion factor (hr/min) and the conservative maximum organ dose conversion factor (Nb-95, GI-LLI -- 1.51E+06 mrem/hr per pCi/ml) oD 1.5 Secondary Side Radioactive Liquid Effluents and Dose Calculations During Primary to I~ Secondary Leakage i During periods of primary to secondary leakage (i.e., steam generator tube leaks), radioactive material

_) will be transmitted from the primary system to the secondary system. The potential exists for the

> release of radioactive material to the off-site environment (Delaware River) via secondary system

'discharges. Potential releases are controlled/monitored by the Steam Generator Blowdown monitors I (R1 9)and the Chemical Waste Basin monitor (R37).:

However to ensure compliance with.the regulatory limits on radioactive material releases, it may be

> desirable to account for potential releases from the secondary system during periods of primary to secondary leakage. Any potentially significant releases will be via the Chemical Waste Basin with the 2,. major source of activity being the Steam Generator Blowdown.

Im)" With identified radioactive material levels in the secondary system, appropriate samples should be Z S collected and analyzed for the principal gamma emitting radionuclides. Based on the identified

Page 79 of 155

I Salem ODCM Rev. 22 radioactive material levels and the volume of water discharged, the resulting environmental. doses may I

be calculated based on equation (1.5).

Because the release rate from the secondary system is indirect (e.g., SG blowdown is normally routed to condenser where the condensate clean-up system will remove much of the radioactive material),

samples should be collected from the release point (i.e., Chemical Waste Basin) for quantifying the radioactive material releases. However, for conservatism and ease of controlling and quantifying all potential release paths, it is prudent to sample the SG blowdown and to assume all radioactive material is released directly to the environment via the Chemical Waste Basin. This approach while not exact is conservative and ensures timely analysis for regulatory compliance. Accounting for radioactive material retention of the condensate clean-up system ion exchange resins may be needed to more accurately account for actual releases.

In addition to the secondary releases described in this section, the Salem Ground Water Remediation System also can potentially discharge radioactive material to the Chemical Waste Basin. To ensure regulatory compliance, the releases are monitored by Radiation Monitor R-37. Samples are also collected, and analyzed for radionuclides. Based on the identified radioactive material levels and the volume of water discharged, the resulting environmental doses may be calculated based on equation (1 .5).

1.6 Liquid Effluent Dose Projections ODCM CONTROL 3. 11.1.3 requires that.the liquid radioactive waste processing system be used to reduce the radioactive material levels in the liquid waste prior to release when the quarterly projected doses exceed:

Z - 0.375 mrem to the total body, or

-)- - 1.25 mrem to any organ..

z The applicable liquid waste processing system for maintaining radioactive material releases ALARA is .

V the-ion exchange system-as delineated in Figure 1-3. Alternately, the waste evaporator as presented in the Salem FSAR has processing capabilities meeting the NRC ALARA design requirements and may

< be used in conjunction or in lieu of the ion exchange system for waste processing requirements in -

I accordance with ODCM CONTROL 3.11.1.3. These processing requirements are applicable to each z unit individually. Exceeding the projected dose requiring.processing prior to release for one unit does o not in itself dictate processing requirements for the other unit.

ry Dose projections are made at least once per 31 days by the following equations:

z_

D -bp -D b 9 (.9) 0 D h~xp D (9Vd (1.10)

__JI

O Where:

0

_ Dtbp = the total body dose projection for current calendar quarter (mrem) wy Page 80 of 155 w

D 'I

Salem ODCM Rev. 22

- Dtb the total body dose to date for current calendar quarter as determined by Equation 1.5 or 1.7 (mr.em)

W Dmraxp = the maximum organ dose projection for current calendar quarter (mrem):

Da* = the maximum organ dose to date for current calendar quarter as determined by Equation 1.5 or 1.7 (mrem) d = the number of days to date for current calendar quarter 91 = the number of days in a calendar quarter I 2.0 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS 2.1 Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation and Controls The gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation and controls at Salem for controlling and monitoring normal radioactive material releases in accordance with the Technical Specifications 6.8.4.g and i ODCM CONTROLS are summarized a.s follows:

1) Waste Gas Holdup System - The vent header gases are collected by the waste gas holdup system.

Gases may be recycled to provide cover gas for the CVCS hold-up tank or held in the waste gas tanks for decay prior to release. Waste gas decay tanks are batch released after sampling and analysis. The tanks are discharged via the Plant Vent. 1-R41D provides noble gas monitoring and automatic isolation of waste gas decay tank releases for Unit-1. This function is provided by 2-R41D for Unit-2.

2) Containment Purge and Pressure/Vacuum Relief - containment purges and pressure/vacuum reliefs are released to the atmosphere via the respective unit Plant Vent. Noble gas monitoring and~auto isolation function are provided by 1-R41D for Unit-1 and 2-R41D for Unit-2. Additionally, in accordance with ODCM CONTROL 3.3.3.9, Table 3.3-13, 1-R12A and 2-R12A may be used to provide the containment monitoring and automatic isolation function during purge and pressure/vacuum I~ C-)

reliefs (*)

I* 3) Plant Vent - The Plant Vent for each respective unit receives discharges from the-waste gas hold-up system, condenser evacuation system, containment purge and pressure/vacuum reliefs, and the I(for Auxiliary Building ventilation. Effluents are monitored by R41D, a flow through gross activity monitor noble gas monitoring). Radioiodine and particulate sampling capabilities are provided by charcoal cartridge and filter medium samplers. Additionally, back-up sampling capability for radioiodine and particulates is provided at the 1-R45 and 2-R45 sampling skids. Plant Vent flow rate is measured and 0 as a back-up may be determined empirically as a function of fan operation (fan curves). Sampler flow 11

rates are determined by flow rate instrumentation (e.g., venturi rotameter).

I .

Gaseous radioactive effluent flow diagrams with the applicable, associated radiation monitoring instrumentation and controls are presented in Figures 2-1. A simplified diagram of the Gaseous radioactive waste disposal system is provided in Figure 2-2.

0

The R12A in Mode 6 provides containment monitoring and alarm functions without automatic I° zae isolation Page 81 of 155 UQLU

I 2.2 Gaseous Effluent Monitor Setpoint Determination Salem ODCM Rev. 22 I

2.2.1 Containment and Plant Vent Monitor I

Per the requirements of ODCM CONTROL 3.3.3.9, alarm setpoints shall be established for the gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation to ensure that the release rate of noble gases does not exceed the limits of ODCM CONTROL 3.11.2.1, which corresponds to a dose rate at the SITE BOUNDARY of I 500 mrem/year to the total body or 3000 mrem/year to the skin.

Based on a grab sample analysis of the applicable release (i.e., grab sample.of the Containment I atmosphere, waste gas decay tank, or Plant Vent), the radiation monitoring alarm setpoints may be established by the following calculation method. The measured radionuclide concentrations and release rate are used to calculate the fraction of the allowable release rate, as limited by Specification 3.11.2.1, I by the equation:

FRAC = 4.72E +02 * *VF , c[-" (2.1)

I I

F[iQ (2.2)

I Where:

FRAC = fraction of the allowable release rate based on the identified radionuclide concentrations I and the release flow rate z

7Q annual average meteorological dispersion to the controlling site boundary location I V) z 0

VF Iti (sec/m 3).

= ventilation system flow rate for the applicable release point and monitor (ft3/min)

= concentration of noble gas radionuclide i as determined by radioanalysis of grab sample I

(pCi/cm 3)

H---

H--

- total body dose conversion factorfor noble gas radionuclide i (mrem/yr per JtCi/mý from Table 2-1)

I z" Li beta'skin dose conversion factor for noble gas radionuclide i (mrem/yr per .tCi/m3 from 0(13 Mi =

Table 2-1) gamma air dose conversion factor for noble gas radionuclide i (mrem/yr per pCi/m3 I

from Table 2-1) 1.1 500 mrem skin dose per mrad gamma air dose (mrnem/mrad)

= total body dose rate limit (mrem/yr) I 0 3000 = skin dose rate limit (mrem/yr)

W 4.7 2 E+02 = conversion factor (cm 3 /ft 3

min/sec)

Based on the more limiting FRAC (i.e., higher value) as determined above, the alarm setpoints for the I

U--

0 my applicable monitors (R41D, and/or RI 2A) may be calculated by the equation:

I

-LJ I

Page 82 of 155 0.

Ld I

Salem ODCM Rev. 22

.Ci*SEN I

SP= AF* iFRAC +bkg (2.3)

I Where:

SP = alarm setpoint corresponding to the maximum allowable release rate (cpm)

SEN = monitor sensitivity (cpm per p.Ci/cm 3) bkg = background of the monitor (cpm)

AF = administrative allocation factor for the specific monitor and type release, which corresponds to the fraction of the total allowable release rate that is administfatively allocated to the release.

The allocation factor (AF) is an administrative control imposed to ensure tha&combined releases from Salem Units 1 and 2 and Hope Creek will not exceed the regulatory limits on release rate from the site I (i.e., the release rate limits of ODCM CONTROL 3.11.2.1). Normally, the combined AF value for Salem Units 1 and 2 is equal to 0.5 (0.25 per unit), with the remainder 0.5 allocated to Hope Creek.

Any increase in AF above 0.5 for the Salem Nuclear Generating Station will be coordinated with the Hope Creek Generating Station to ensure that the combined allocation factors for all units do not exceed 1.0.

I O 2.2.2 Conservative Default Values A conservative alarm setpoint can be established, in lieu of the individual radionuclide evaluation based

-y on the grab sample analysis, to eliminate the potential of periodically having to adjust. the setpoint to 7* reflect minor changes in radionuclide distribution and variations in release flow rate. The alarm

- setpoint may be conservatively determined by the default values presented in Table 2-2.1 and 2-2.2 for Units 1 and 2, respectively. These values are based upon:

- the maximum ventilation (or purge). flow rate;

- a radionuclide distribution comprised of 95%,Xe-i33, 2% Xe-,135, 1% Xe-133m', 1% Kr-88 and SKr-85; and

- an administrative allocation factor of 0.25 to conservatively ensure that any simultaneous releases 3

z" from Salem Units 1 and 2 do not exceed the maximum allowable release rate. For this radionuclide distribution, the alarm setpoint based on the. total body dose rate is more restrictive than the

>corresponding setpoint based on the skin dose rate.

LJ 0 a) Adopted from ANSI N237-1976/ANS-18.1, Source Term Specifications, Table 6 a *2.3 Gaseous Effluent Instantaneous Dose Rate Calculations -10 CFR 20t I* 2.3.1 Site Boundary Dose Rate - Noble Gases 0

Il ui ODCM CONTROL 3.11.2.L1a limits'the dose rate at the SITE BOUNDARY dueto noble gas releases to <500 mrein/yr, total body and <3000 mrem/yr, skin. Radiation.monitor alarm setpoints are established to ensure that these release limits are not exceeded. In the event any gaseous releases from o the station results in an alarm setpoint being exceeded, an evaluation Of the SITE BOUNDARY dose C/) rate resulting from the release shall be performed using the following equations:

Page 83 of 155.

Salem ODCM Rev. 22

Dtb= XQ

I iI (1.4) and Ds~ ~ Q%7JI (2.5)

Where:

Dtb = total body dose rate (mrem/yr)

D, = skin dose rate (mrem/yr)

V = atmospheric dispersion to the controlling SITE BOUNDARY location (sec/m 3) I Qi = average release rate of radionuclide i over the release period under evaluation (gCi/sec). "

Ki = total body dose conversion factor for noble gas radionuclide i (mreni/yr per I.tCi/m 3, from Table 2-1) -

= beta skin dose conversion factor for noble gas radionuclide i (mrenilyr per p.Ci/m 3, from Table 2-1)

Mi = gamma air dose conversion factor for noble gas radionuclide i (mrad/yr per p Ci/m 3 , from Table 2-1)

1.1 = mrem skin dose per mrad gamma air dose (mrem/mrad) "

As appropriate, simultaneous releases from Salem Units 1 and 2 and Hope Creek will be considered in 0 evaluating compliance With the release rate limits of ODCM- CONTROL 3.11.2.1 a, following any

< release exceeding the above prescribed alarm setpoints. " ... ..

Monitor indications (readings) may be averaged over a time period not to exceed 15 minutes when

<7 determining V The 15-minutenoble gas release rate based on correlation of the monitor reading and monitor sensitivity.

averaging is needed to allow for reasonable monitor response to potentially changing radioactive material concentrations and to exclude potential electinic 'spikes in monitor readings that may be unrelated to radioactive material releases. As identified, any electronic spiking monitor' responses.may be excluded from the analysis.

_- NOTE: For administrative purposes, more conservative alarm setpoints than those as

,., prescribed above may be imposed. However,: conditions exceeding these more limiting alarm setpoints do not necessarily indicate radioactive material release rates exceeding

_ the limits of ODCM CONTROL 3.11.2.1.a. Pýrovided actual releases do not result in radiation monitor indications exceeding alarm setpoint values based on the above Uj criteria, no further analyses are required for demonstrating compliance with the limits

> of ODCM CONTROL 3.11.2.1.a. .

0*

0

" Actual: meteorological conditions concurrent with the release period or the default, annual average dispersion parameters. as presented in Table 2-3 may be used for evaluating the gaseous effluent dose V)O rate.

0 Li c* Pag Page 84 of 155 I D I

Salem ODCM Rev. 22 I 2.3.2 Site Boundary Dose Rate - Radioiodine and Particulates 3 ODCM CONTROL 3.11.2.1.b limits the dose rate to <1500 mrem/yr to any organ for 1-131, tritium, and particulates with half-lives greater than 8 days. To demonstrate compliance with this limit, an evaluation is performed at a frequency no greater than that corresponding to the sampling and analysis time period (e.g., nominally once per 7 days). The following equation shall be used for the dose rate evaluation:

D, =

E (2.6)

Where:

Do = average organ dose rate over the sampling time period (mrem/yr)

= atmospheric dispersion to the controlling SITE BOUNDARY location for the inhalation pathway (sec/m 3)

R,0 = dose parameter for radionuclide i (mrem/yr per ýCi/m3) and organ o for the child inhalation pathway from Table 2-4 Qj = average release rate over the appropriate, sampling period and analysis frequency for radionuclide i -- 1-131, tritium or other radionuclide in particulate form with half-life greater than 8 days (p.Ci/sec)

I By substituting 1500 mrem/yr for D, and solving for Q, an allowablerelease rate for 1-131 can be determined. Based on the annual average meteorological dispersion (see Table 2-3) and the most 0o limiting potential pathway, age group and organ (inhalation, child, thyroid -- Rio = 1.62E+07 mrem/yr 0 per PtCi/m 3), the allowable release rate for 1-131 is 42 pCi/sec. Reducing this-release rate by a factor of 4 to account for potential dose contributions from other radioactive particulate material and other release points (e.g., Hope Creek), the corresponding release rate allocated to each of the Salem units is I0< 10.5 ýtCi/sec.

V) For a 7 day period, which is the nominal sampling and analysis frequency for 1-131, the cumulative D release is 6.3 Ci. Therefore, as long as the 1-131 releases in any 7 dayperiod do not exceed 6.3 Ci, no additional analyses are needed for verifying compliance with the ODCM CONTROL 3.11.2. .b limits on allowablerelease rate.

I . 2.4 Noble Gas Effluent Dose Calculations - 10 CFR 50 2.4.1 UNRESTRICTED AREA Dose - Noble Gases I __a

~ ODCM CONTROL. 3.11.2.2 requires aperiodic assessment of releases of noble gases to evaluate compliance with the quarterly dose limits of<5_ mrad, gamma-air and <10 mrad, beta-air and the

>" calendar year limits <10 mrad, gamma-air and <20 mrad, beta-air. The limits are applicable separately re, to each unit and are not combined site limits. The following equations shall be used to calculate the.

Iio 0

gamma-air and beta-air doses:

-7Dy 3.17E-O08* Q A J (2.7) iria Page 85 of 155

I Salem ODCM Rev. 22 andWI D,6=.3.17E- O8 Ai*Z2 -I (2.8),I Where:

D7 = air dose due to gamma emissions for noble gas radionuclides (mrad)

Dp = air dose due to beta emissions for noble gas radionuclides (mrad)

Q atmospheric dispersion to theI: controlling SITE BOUNDARY location (sec/m3)

Qi cumulative release of noble gas radionuclide i over the period of interest (iCi) where pCi = (jtCi/cc)*(cc released) or (jtCi/sec)*(sec released)

Mi air dose factor due to gamma emissions from noble gas radionuclide i (mrad/yr per p.Ci/mr3 ; from Table 2-1)

Ni air dose factor due to beta emissions from noble gas radionuclide i (mrad/yr per pCi/m 3, Table 2-1) 3.17E-08 conversion factor (yr/sec) 2.4.2 Simplified Dose Calculation for Noble Gases In lieu of the individual noble gas radionuclide dose assessment as presented above, the following I simplified dose calculation equations may be used for verifying compliance with the dose limits of ODCM CONTROL 3.11.2.2. (Refer to Appendix C for the derivation and justification for this simplified method and for values of Meff, and Neff..)

i~~iC~~z 3.17E-08 , , .I D ** i (2.9) 0.50 2 i and 3.17E'-08U D6 = * *Nf'* (2.10) z 0.50 2 .

Where: I~l" 0 Me = 5.3E+02, effective gamma-air dose factor (nirad/yr per pCi/m 3)

Z Neff = 3

. E+03,. effective beta-air dose factor (mrad/yr per ýtCi/m )

SQi cumulative release for all noble gas radionuclides (ýLCi), where p.Ci =(@Ci/cc)* (cc

"> released) or (ýtCi/sec) * (sec released) 0 *K 0.50 conservatism factor to account for potential variability in the radionuclide distribution

, Actual meteorological conditions concurrent with the release period or the default, annual ayerage 0I dispersion parameters as presented in Table 2-3, may be used for the evaluation of the gamma-air and

~beta-air doses.

w I Page 86 of 155.

D I

Salem ODCM Rev. 22

.-2.5 Radioiodine and Particulate Dose Calculations - 10 CFR 50 I O 2.5.1 UNRESTRICTED AREA Dose - Radioiodine and Particulates In accordance with requirements of ODCM CONTROL 3.11.2.3, a periodic assessment shall be performed to evaluate compliance with the quarterly dose limit of <7.5 mrem and calendar year limit

<15 mrem to any organ. The following equation shall be used to evaluate the maximum organ dose due to releases of 1-131, tritium and particulates with half-lives greater than 8 days:

Dop=3.17E-08*W*SFp* R4_jEii (2.11)

Where:

Daop = dose or dose commitment via all pathways p and controlling age group a (as identified in Table 2-3) to organ o, including the total body (mrem)

W atmospheric dispersion parameter to the controlling location(s) as identified in Table 2-3 ZiQ = atmospheric dispersion for inhalation pathway and H-3 dose contribution via other pathways (sec/nm3)

D/Q = atmospheric deposition for vegetation, milk and ground plane exposure pathways S(m"2)

Riop dose factor for radionuclide i (mrem/yr per tCi/ni 3) or (M2 - mrem/yr per pCi/sec)

I and organ o from Table 2-4 for each age group and the applicable pathway p as identified in Table 2-3. Values for Riop were derived in accordance with the Lmethods described in NUREG-0133.

Qj = cumulative release over the period of interest for radionuclide i -- 1-13 1, tritium, or W radioactive material in particulate form with half-life greater than 8 days (QCi).

SFp annual seasonal correction factor to account for the fraction of the year that the applicable exposure pathway does not exist.

< 1) For milk and vegetation exposure pathways:

A six month fresh vegetation and grazing season (May through October) 0.5 F aa t 2) For inhalation and ground plane exposure pathways: = 1.0

-3 For evaluating the maximum exposed individual, only the controlling pathways and age group as 0 identified in Table 2-3 need be evaluated for compliance with ODCM CONTROL 3.11.2.3.

W, 2.5.2 Simplified Dose Calculation for Radioiodines and Particulates.

.Z* In lieu of the individual radionuclide (1-131, tritium, and particulates) dose assessment as presented above, the following simplified dose calculation equation may be used for verifying compliance with Wn: the dose limits of ODCM CONTROL 3.11.2.3 (refer to Appendix D for the derivation and justification

> of this simplified method).

0 liO O ~max--3.17E-O08.V*W SFp* Rt -.i3, *ZQi. (2.12) a-Page 87 of 155 ryd U

Salem ODCM Rev. 22 Where: I S Dx = maximum organ dose (mrem)

R1.131 = 1-131 dose parameter for the thyroid for the identified controlling pathway

= 1.05E+l 2, infant thyroid dose parameter with the grass-cow-milk pathway controlling (mi2 - mrem/yr per ýtCi/sec) 2 W = D/Q for radioiodine, 2.1 E- 10 1/m Qi = cumulative release over the period of interest for radionuclide i 131, tritium, or radioactive material in particulate from with half life greater than 8 days (1tCi)

The dose should be evaluated based on the predetermined controlling pathways as identified in Table 2-

3. If more limiting exposure pathways are determined to exist in the surrounding environment of Salem by the annual land-use census, Table 2-3 will be revised as specified in ODCM CONTROL 3.12.2.

2.6 Secondary Side Radioactive Gaseous Effluents and Dose Calculations.

During periods of primary to secondary leakage, minor levels of radioactive material may be released via the secondary system to the atmosphere. Non-condensables (e.g., noble gases) will be n predominately released via the condenser evacuation system and will be monitored and quantified by the routine plant vent monitoring and sampling system and procedures (e.g., R15 on condenser evacuation, R41D on plant vent, and the plant vent particulate and charcoal samplers).

However, if the Steam Generator blowdown is routed directly to the Chemical Waste Basin.(via the SG V

blowdown flash tank) instead of being recycled through the condenser, it may be desirable to account for the potential atmospheric releases of radioiodines and particulates from the flash tank vent (i.e.,

I 0 releases due to moisture carry over). Since this pathway is not sampled or monitored, it is necessary to

< calculate potential releases. .

r Based on the guidance in NRC NUREG-0133, the releases of the radioiodines and particulates shall be LI < calculated by the equation:

H---

Q =Ci*Rsgb*Fft* 4 (2.13)

LI zý 0

Where:

>Qj = the release rate of radionuclide, i, from the steam generator flash tank vent (ptCi/sec) ry, Ci = the concentration. of radionuclide, i, in the secondary coolant water averaged over not z* more than one week (iXCi/ml)

S Rgb the steam generator blowdown rate to the flash tank (ml/sec)

Fft =the fraction of blowdown. flashed in the'tank determined from a heat balance'taken

> around the flash tank at the applicable reactor power level ae SQft= the measured steam quality in the flash tank vent; or an assumed value of 0.85, based on I .NUREG-0017.

m Tritium releases via the steam flashing may also be quantified using the above equation with the o assumption of a steam quality (SQf) equal to 0. Since the H-3 will be associated with the water w

Page 88 of 155.

D

Salem ODCM Rev. 22 molecules, it is not necessary to account for the moisture carry-over which is the transport media for the I. radioiodines and particulates.

Based on the design and operating conditions at Salem, the fraction of blowdown converted.to steam (Fft) is approximately 0.48. The equation simplifies to the following:

Qi = 0.072*Ci*Pgb (2.14)

I For H-3, the simplified equation is:

Qi= 0.48* Ci* *lgb (2.15)

Also during reactor shutdown operations with a radioactively contaminated secondary system; radioactive material maybe released to the atmosphere via the atmospheric reliefs (PORV)- and the safety reliefs on the main steam lines and via the steam driven auxiliary feed pump exhaust. The evaluation of the radioactive material concentration in the steam relative to that in the steam generator I water is based on the guidance ofNUREG-0017, Revision 1. The partitioning factors for the radioiodines is 0.01 and is 0.005 for all other particulate radioactive material. The resulting equation for quantifying releases via the atmospheric steam releases is:

Q = 0.13 * (2.16)

S Where:

/Qj = release rate of radionuclide i via pathway j,(jtCi/sec)

W Cij = concentration of radionuclide i, in pathway j,(ptCi/ml)

SSFj = steam flow for release pathway j

= 400,000 lb/hr per PORV I -= 850,000 lb/hr per safety relief valve 62,500 lb/hr for auxiliary feed pump exhaust I ~PF

= partitioning factor, ratio of concentration in steam to that in the water in the steam Hgenerator

- 0.01 for radioiodines 0 - 0.005 for all other particulates

=~z 1.0 for H-3 W, 0.13 conversion factor - [(hr*ml) / (sec*lb)]

,> Any significant releases of noble gases via the atmospheric steam releases can be quantified in

accordance with the calculation methods of the Salem Emergency Plan Implementation Procedure.

0: Alternately, the quantification of the release rate and cumulative releases may be based on secondary samples. The measured radionuclide concentration in the secondary system may be used for.

I_

' quantifying the noble gases, radioiodine and particulate releases.

7° Page 89 of i55

Salem ODCM Rev. 22

' Note: The expected mode of operation would be to isolate the effected steam generator, thereby reducing the potential releases during the shutdown/cooldown process. Use of the above U

calculation methods should consider actual operating conditions and release mechanisms.

The calculated quantities of radioactive materials may be used as inputs to the equation (2.11) or (2.12) to calculate offsite doses for demonstrating compliance with the Technical Specifications 6.8.4.g and the ODCM CONTROLS.

2.7 Gaseous Effluent Dose Projection ODCM CONTROL 3.11.2.4 requires that the GASEOUS RADWASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM and VENTILATION EXHAUST TREATMENT SYSTEM be used to reduce radioactive material levels I prior to discharge when projected doses exceed one-half the annual design objective rate in any

calendar quarter,. i.e., exceeding:

- 0.625 mrad/quarter, gamma air;

- 1.25 mrad/quarter, beta air; or

- 1.875 mrem/quarter, maximum organ. I The applicable gaseous processing systems for maintaining radioactive material releases ALARA are the Auxiliary Building normal ventilation system (filtration'systems # 1, 2 and 3) and the Waste Gas I Decay Tanks as delineated in Figures 2-1 and 2-2. Dose projections are performed at least once per 31 days by the following equations:

Dyp Dr* 9D (2.17) o D pp =D,6 *(.18)

<c=Drnaxp ---D max* 9*(2.19)

~I z" Where:

_ Dvp =gamma air dose projection for current calendar quarter(mrad)

Li D - gamma air dose to date for current calendar quarter as determined by Equation 2.7 or 0 2.9 (mrem)

Z D = beta air dose projection for current calendar quarter (mrad)

" Dp = beta air dose to date for current calendar:quarter as determined by Equation 2.8 or L,, 2. 10 (mrem)

>y Dmaxp = maximum organ dose projection for current calendar o quarter (mriem)

L,. pin= maximum organ dose to date for current calendar quarter as determined by Equation 2.11 or 2.12 (mrem) 5d number of days to date in current calendar quarter z

0 91 number of days in a calendar quarter W

C1 Page 90 of 155 I

w *

I

Salem ODCM Rev. 22 3.0 SPECIAL DOSE ANALYSES

'

3.1 Doses Due To Activities Inside the SITE BOUNDARY In accordance with ODCM CONTROL 6.9.1.8, the Radioactive Effluent Release Report (RERR) shall include an assessment of radiation doses from radioactive liquid and gaseous effluents to MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC due to their activities inside the SITE BOUNDARY.

The calculation methods as presented in Sections 2.4 and 2.5 may be used for determining the maximum potential dose to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC based on the-parameters from Table 2-3 and 2-hours per visit per year. The default value for the meteorological dispersion data as presented in Table 2-3 may be used if current year meteorology is unavailable at the time of NRC reporting. However, a follow-up evaluation shall be performed when the data becomes available.

3.2 Total dose to MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC - 40 CFR 190 and 10 CFR 72.104 The Radioactive Effluent Release Report (RERR) shall also include an assessment of the radiation dose to the likely most exposed MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC for reactor releases and other nearby uranium fuel cycle sources (including dose contributions from effluents and direct radiation from on-site sources). For the likely mostexposed MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC in the vicinity of Artificial Island, the sources of exposure need only consider the Salem Nuclear Generating Station and the Hope Creek Nuclear Generating Station which includes the Independent Spent Fuel Storage I

Installation (ISFSI): No other fuel cycle facilities contribute to the MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC dose for the Artificial Island vicinity.

I The dose contribution from the operation of Hope Creek Nuclear Generating Station will be estimated based on the methods as presented in the Hope Creek Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (HCGS ODCM).

I ~ As appropriate for demonstrating/evaluating compliance with the limits of ODCM CONTROL 3.11.4 (40 CFR 190), the results of the environmental monitoring program may be used for providing data on actual measured levels of radioactive material in the actual pathways of exposure.

V) 3.2.1 Effluent Dose Calculations I For purposes of implementing the surveillance requirements of ODCM CONTROL 3/4.11.4 and the

>- reporting requirements of 6.9.1.8 (RERR), dose calculations for the Salem Nuclear Generating z: Station should be performed using the controlling pathways, and locations of Table 2-3 and the I z calculation methods contained within this ODCM. If more limiting exposure pathways are'

- determined to exist in the surrounding environment of Salem by the annual land-use census, Table 2-W3 will be revised as specified in ODCM CONTROL 3.12.2.

L.i I6 U-Average annual meteorological dispersion parameters or meteorological conditions concurrent with the release period under evaluation may be used.

z rK Page 91 of 155 1r.

I Salem ODCM Rev. 22 3.2.2 Direct Exposure Dose Determination.

S Any potentially significant direct exposure contribution to off-site individual doses may be evaluated based on the results of the environmental measurements (e.g., DLR, ion chamber measurements) and/or by the use of a radiation transport and shielding calculation method.

Only during a non-typical condition will there exist any potential for significant on-site sources atI Salem that would yield potentially significant off-site doses (i.e., in excess of 1 mrem per year to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC), that would require detailed evaluation for,demonstrating compliance" with 40 CFR 190 or 10 CFR 72.104. " U However, should a situation exist where the direct exposure contribution is potentially significant, on- I site measurements, off-site measurements and/or calculation techniques will be used for determination of dose for assessing 40 CFR 190 or 10 CFR 72.104 compliance.

4.0 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM 4.1 Sampling Program The operational phase of the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) is conducted in accordance with the requirements of ODCM CONTROL 3.12. The objectives of the program are:

- To determine Whether any significant increases occur in the concentration of radionuclides in the critical pathways of exposurein the vicinity of Artificial Island;

- To determine if the operation of the Salem Nuclear Generating Stations has resulted in any increase 0 in the inventory of long lived radionuclides in the environment; C-)- - To detect any changes in the ambient gamma radiation levels; and z - To verify that SNGS operations have no detrimental effects on the health and safety of the public or on the environment.

< The sampling requirements (type of samples*, collection frequency.and analysis) and sample locations are presented in Appendix E.

zo *

")NOTE: No public drinking water samples or irrigation water samples are required as these pathways are not directly effected by liquid effluents discharged from Salem Generating Station.

z 4.2 Interlaboratory Comparison Program L ODCM CONTROL 3.12.3 requires analyses be performed on radioactive material supplied as part of

> an Interlaboratory Comparison Program. Participation in an approved Interlaboratory Comparison I

3 Program provides a check on the precision and accuracy of measurements of radioactive materials in Li, environmental samples.

@ A summary of the Interlaboratory Comparison Program results will be provided in the Annual o Radiological Environmental Operating Report pursuant to ODCM CONTROL 6.9.1.7.

Page 92 of.155 D

C/)

I

M m- -mm - m-m-m-m - M M-USER RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING REVISION, STATUS AND CHANGES Salem ODC~ev. 22 FIGURE 1-1: LIQUID RELEASE FLOWPATH UNIT 1 41TORSERVICE IIlTOR WATER GROUND WATER TO NON-RAD (C) A CONTAINMENT REMEDIATION (Figure 1-2) IFAN COIL UNITS SYSTEM TO CIRC ATING WATER SYSTEM TO NON-RAD (B) R 13 MONITORS (Figure 1-2)

To River Page 93 of 155

USER RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIF'f)NG REVISION, STATUS AND CHANGES Salem ODCRev. 22 FIGURE 1-2: LIQUID RELEASE FLOwpATH UNIT 2 T....... . TO CIRCULATING T

WATER SYSTEM FROM UNIT 1 (C) (Figure 1-1) .J

- - - M M M M-- M- M- M M M M

USER RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING REVISION, STATUS AND CHANGES Salem ODC* ev 22 FIGURE 1-3: LIQUID RADIOACTIVE WASTE SYSTEM LAUNDRY CHEMICAL WASTE GAS" AND HOT DRAIN COMPRESSOR ACCUM.

DMEVPRATOR SSTEM SHOWER TANK.

EVAPORATORANALYZER - W

ASTE GAS PACKAE OREXCESS PORTABLE "LETDOWN REFUELING NGE WASTELAKF HOLD-UP .

TANK IO.PnRA.N SOLID MISC DRAINS N

RADI WASTE REACTOR COOLANT

________ RELIEF VALVES- - -- L Page 95 of 155

I Salem ODCM Rev. 22 Table 1-1. 1: Parameters for Liquid Alarm Setpoint Determinations Unit 1 I Parameter Actual Default Units Comments I Value Value MPCC Calculated 6.05E-06 * ýLCi/ml Calculated for each batch to be released. I MPC 1-131 3.OE-07 N/A jtCi/ml 1-131 MPC conservatively used for SG biowdown and Service Water monitor setpoints.

I Ci Measured N/A gCi/ml

_ _liquid Taken from gamma spectral analysis of effluent. I S MPCi as determined N/A PCi/ml Taken from 10 CFR 20, Appe ndix B, Table II, Col 2 (Appendix F).

Sensitivity as determined N/A cpm per Monitor sensitivities are controlled

...i 1-R18 j.tCi/ml under Public Service Blueprint 1-R19 (AB,C,D) l-R13 (A and B)

Document (PSBP) 315733

" I CW as determined 1.00E+05 gpm Circulating water system - single CW RR as determined gpm' pump ***

Determined prior to release; release rate I

I-R18 120 can be adjusted for ODCM CONTROL compliance 1-R19 250 Steam Generator blowdown rate per I zC-)

-R13 1.00 E +05 Generator Service Water flow rate for I

Containment fan coolers 0 Setpoint 1-R18 Calculated N/A cpm Monitor setpoints are controlled under Public Service Blueprint Document I

l-R19 (A,B,C,D)** (PSBP) 315733 V_)

Q-:

z 1-R13 (A and B)**

Correction Factor as determined 0.75 Unitless Default parameter to account for non-I (LI 0

LI)

(Non-Gamma) gamma emitting nuclides.

Allocation Factor I-R19 0.5 0.5 Unitless Conservatism factor to preclude exceeding MPC limit in the case of I

Z" simultaneous primary-to-secondary 0

0 zI--

U-leaks at both Salem Units I

Cr)

Refer to Appendix A for derivation The MPC value of 1-131 (3E-07 *Ci/ml) has been used for derivation of R19 Steam Generator Blowdown and R13 Service I

Water monitor setpoints as discussed in Section 1.2.2 C/_

U-.. During periods when Unit 2 Circulators are out of service, the CW flow for I-R13 monitors is zero. See Section 1.2.2.

I LL_

Q2 (I) Page 96 of 155

Salem ODCM Rev. 22 is Table 1-1.2: Parameters for Liquid Alarm Setpoint Determinations - Unit 2, Parameter Actual Default Units Value Value Comments MPCe Calculated 4:.8iE-06

jtCi/ml Calculated for each batch to be released.

MPC 1-131 3.0E-07 N/A ptCi/ml 1-131 MPC conservatively used for SG blowdown, Service Water and Chemical Waste Basin monitor setpoints.

C1 Measured N/A gCi/ml Taken from gamma spectral analysis of liquid effluent.

MPCi as determined N/A gCi/ml Taken from 10 CFR 20, Appendix B,

... ..... . . . Table II, Col. 2 (Appendix F)

Sensitivity as determined N/A cpm per Monitor sensitivities are controlled 2-R18 gtCi/ml under Public Service Blueprint Document 2RI9(A,B,C,D) 315734 2-R13(A and B)

R37 CW as determined 1.OE+05 gpm Circulating Water System, single CW pump ***

RR as determined 120 gpm. Determined prior to release; release rate 2-RI8 can be adjusted for ODCM CONTROL Compliance 250 I.

< 2-Ri9 Steam Generator Blowdown rate per Generator r

,1.0E+05 2-R*3 Circulating Water System, single CW 1200 Pump R37 Chemical Waste Basin discharge Setpoint Calculated N/A cpm Monitor setpoints are controlled under 0

2-R18 Public Service Blueprint Document 2-R19(A,B,C,D)** (PSBP) 315734 2-RI3(A and B)**

R37 **

=>

Correction Factor as determined 0.75 Unitless Default parameter to account for non-t.IZ (Non-Gamma) gamma emitting nuclides.

Allocation Factor 0.5 0.5 Unitless Conservatism factor to preclude 2-R19 . exceeding MPC limit in the case of I>-

C, simultaneous primary-to-secondary leaks at both Salem Units

Refer to Appendix A for derivation

"* The MPC value of 1-131 (3.OE-7 MCi/ml) has been used for derivation of the R13, R19 and R37 monitor setpoints as discussed in Section 1.2.2 03

During periods.when Unit 1 Circulators are out of service, the CW flow for 2-R13 monitors is zero. See Section 1.2.2.

na Page 97 of 155

I Salem ODCM Rev. 22 I

TABLE 1-2: Site Related Ingestion Dose Commitment Factor. Ai. i (Fish And Invertebrate Consumption)

(mrem/hr per piCi/ml)

I H-3 C-14 Na-24 1.45E+4 4.57E-1 2.82E-1 2.90E+3 4.57E-1 2.82E-1 2.90E+3 4.57E-1 2.82E-1 2.90E+3 4.57E-1 2.82E-1' 2.90E+3 4,57E-I 2.82E-1 2.90E+3 4.57E-1 2.82E'-1 2.90E+3 4.57E-1 I

P-32 4.69E+6 2.91E+5 1.8tE+5 - 5.27E+5 Cr-51 Mn-54 7.06E+3.

5.58E+O i.35E+3 3.34E+O 1.23E+O 2.10E+3 7.40E+O 1.40E+3 2.16E+4 I

Mn-56 1.78E+2 3.15E+1 2.26E+2 5.67E+3 Fe-55 Fe-59 Co-57 5.11 E+4 8.06E+4

-3.53E+4 1.90E+5 1.42E+2 8.23E+3 7.27E+4 2.36E+ý2

- 1.97E+4 5.30E+4 2.03E+4 6.32E+5 3.59E+3 I

Co-58 Co-60 Ni-63 4.96E+4 6.03E+2 1.73E+3 3.44E+3 1.35E+3 3.82E+3 1.67E+3

- 1.22E+ý4 3.25E+4 7.18E+2 I

Ni-65 2.02E+2 2.62E+1 l.20E+1 6.65E+2 Cu-64 Zn-65 1.61E+5 2.14E+2 5.13E+5 1.01E+2 2.32E+5 5.40E+2 3.43E+5

- 1.83E+4 3.23E+5 I

Zn-69 3.43E+2 6.56E+2 4.56E+1 - 4.26E+2 9.85E+1 As-76 Br-82 4.38E+2 1..16E+3 5.14E+3 4.07E+O 3.42E+2 1.39E+3 3.58E+2 4.30E+4 4.67E+O I

Br-83 7.25E-2 1.04E-1 (D5 z

Br-84 Br-85 Rb-86

- 6.24E+2 9.39E-2 3.86E-3 2.91E+2 7.37E-7 1.23E+2 I

Z Rb-88 Rb-89 Sr-89 4.99E+3 1.79E+O 1.19E+O 9.49E-1 8.34E-1 1.43E+2

-6.89E-14 2.47E-1I 8.OOE+2 I

Sr-90 1.23E+5 - 3.01E+4 --

I LLJ -3.55E+3 ry Sr-91 9.18E+1 .3.71E+0 - 4.37E+2 0 Sr-92 3.48E+1 1.51E+40 - 6.90E+2 Y-90 6.06E+0 - 1.63E-1 - 6.42E+4 z"

0 0

Y-91m Y-91 Y-92

.5.73E-2 8.88E+1 5.32E-1 2.22E-3 2.37E+0 1.56E-2

-1.68E-1

- 4.89E+4 9.32E+3 I

Y-93 1.69E+O 4.66E-2 - 5.35E+4 Zr-95 Zr-97 1.59E+1 8.81E-1 5.11E+0

.1.78E-1

- 3.46E+O 8.13E&2 8.02E+O 2.68E-1 1.62E+4 5.51E+4 I

a-- Nb-95 4.47E+2 2.49E+2 1.34E+2 2.46E+2 1.51E+6 U3

(/J Nb-97 Mo-99 3.75E+O 9.49E-1 1.28E+2' 3.46E-1 2.43E+1 l.11E+O 2.89E+2 3.50E+3 2.96E+2 I

tý, Tc-99m 1.30E-2 3.66E-2 4.66E-1 - 5.56E-1 1.79E-2 2.17E+1 0~.

D 0t2 0a w

Tc-101 1.33E-2 1.92E-2 1.88E-1 - 3.46E-1 9.81E-3 5.77E-14 I

w1 0

0 I

Page 98 of 155 I

Salem ODCM Rev. 22 I - TABLE 1-2 (cont'd)

Site Related Ingestion Dose Commitment Factor, A1 o (Fish And Invertebrate Consumption)

(mren/hr per pCi/m1)

Ru-103 1.07E-+2 - 4.60E+1 4.07E+2 - 1.25E+4 Ru-105 8.89E+O - 3.51E+O 1.15E+2 - 5.44E+3 Ru-106 1.59E+3 - 2.01E+2 .3.06E+3 - 1.03E+5 Rh-103m . ......

Rh-106 - - -

Ag-1Orn 1.56E+3 1.45E+3 8.60E+2 2.85E+3 - 5.91E+5 Sb-122 1.98E+1 4.55E-1 6.82E+O 3.06E-1 - 1.19E+1 7.51E+3 Sb-124 2.77E+2 5.23E+O 1.10E+2 6.71E-1 2.15E+2 7.86E+3 Sb-125 1.77E+2 1.98E+0 4.21E+1 1.80E-1 - 1.36E+2 1.95E+3 Sb-126 1.14E+2 2.31E+0 4.10E+1 6.96E-1 - 6.97E+1 9.29E+3 Te-125m 2.17E+2 7.86E+1 2.91E+1 6.52E+1 8.82E+2 - 8.66E+2 Te-127m 5.48E+2 1.96E+2 6.68E+1 1.40E+2 2.23E+3 - 1.84E+3 Te-127 8.90E+O 3.20E+0 1.93E+O 6.60E+O 3.63E+I - 7.03E+2 Te-129m 9.31E+2 3.47E+2 1.47E+2 3.20E+2 3.89E+3 - 4.69E+3 Te-129 2.54E+O 9.55E-1 6.19E-1 1.95E+O 1.07E+l - 1.92E+O I Te-131m Te-131 Te-132 1.40E+2 1.59E+O 2.04E+2 6.85E+1 6.66E-1 1.32E+2 5.71E+1 5.03E-1 1.24E+2 1.08E+2 1.31E+0 1.46E+2 6.94E+2 6.99E+0 1.27E+3 6.80E+3 2.26E-1 6.24E+3 1-130 3.96E+1 1.17E+2 4.61E+1 9.91E+3 1.82E+2 - 1.01E+2 1

I-131 2.18E+2 3.12E+2 1.79E+2 1.02E+5 5.35E+2 - 8.23E+1 1-132 1.06E+1 2.85E+1 9.96E+O 9.96E+2 4.54E+1 - 5.35E+0 1-133 7.45E+1 1.30E+2 3.95E+1 1.90E+4 2.26E+2 - 1.16E+2 1-134 5.56E+O 1.51E+1 5.40E+O 2.62E+2 2.40E+1 - 1.32E-2 11-135 2.32E+1 6.08E+1 2.24E+1 4.01E+3 9.75E+1 - 6.87E+1 Cs-134 6.84E+3 1.63E+4 1.33E+4 - 5.27E+3 1.75E+3 2.85E+2 0 Cs-136 7.16E+2 2.83E+3 2.04E+3 - L57E+3 2.16E+2 3.21E+2 ITCs-137 8.77E+3 1.20E+4 7.85E+3 -4.07E+3 1.35E+3 2.32E+2 Cs-138 6.07E+O 1.20E+l 5.94E+O - 8.81E+0 8.70E-1 5.12E-5 Ba-139 7.85E+0 5.59E-3 2.30E-1 -5.23E&3 3-.17E-3 1.9+

z" Ba-140 1.64E+3 2.06E+0 1.08E+2 -7.02E-1 1.18E+0 3.38E+3 10 Ba-141 3.81E+O 2.88E-3 1.29E-1 2.68E-3 1.63E-3 1.80E-9 Ba-142 1.72E+0 1.77E-3 1.08E-1 1.50E-3 1.OOE-3 ' 2.43E-18 ay La-1 40 1.57E+0 7.94E-1 2.10E-1 -5.83E+4 IQ" La- 142 8.06E-2 ,3.67E-2 9. 13E-3 2.68E+2" Ce-141 3.43E+0 2.32E+O 2.63E-1 - 1.08E+O 8.86E+3 Ce-143 6.04E-1 4.46E+2 4.94E-2. - 1.97E-1 - 1.67E+4 m Ce-144 1.79E+2 7.47E+1 9.59E+O - 4.43E+1 - 6.04E+4

> Pr-143 5.79E+0 2.32E+O 2.87E-1 1.34E+O

- 2.54E+4

.0 Pr- 144 1.90E-2 7.87E-3 9.64E-4 - 4. 44E-3 - 2.73E-9 Nd-147 3.96E+O 4.58E+O .2.74E-1 - 2.68E+O 2.20E+4 W-187 9.16E+O 7.66E+O 2.68E+0 - - 2.5 1E+3

- Np-239 3.53E-2 3.47E-3 1.91E-3 - 1.08E-2 7.11E+2 0

Page 99 of 155

I Salem ODCM Rev. 22 I

Table 1-3: Bioaccumulation Factors (pCi/kg per pCilliter)*

C -1.8E+03 1.4E+03 Na 6.7E,02 1.9E-01 P 3.OE+03 3.OE+04 i Cr 4.OE+02 2.0E+03 Mn 5.5E+02 4.7E+02 Fe Co 3.OE+03 1.0E+02 . 2.OE+04 1.E+03i Ni 1,0E+02 2.5E+02 Cu 6.7E+02 1.7E+03 zn .. 2.0E03 *5.0E+04"i As, 3.3E+02 3.3E+02 Br 1.5E-02 3.1E+00 Rb 8.3E+00 1.7E+01 Sr 2.OE+00 2.OE+01 Y 2.5E+01 1.0E-03 Zr 2.OE+02 8.OE+01 Nb 3.OE+04 L.OE+02 Mo 1.0E+01 1.OE+01 T1C.0E+01 Ru Rh 3.OE+00 L.OE+01 5.OE+01 1.OE+03 2.OE+03 i

U, Ag 3.3E+03 3.3E+03 Sb 4.OE+01 5.4E+00 Te 1.OE+01 1.0E+02 U I 1.OE+01 5.OE+01 n Cs 4.OE+01 2.5E+01 Ba 1.0E+01 1.OE+02 La 2.5E+01 1.0E+03 Ce 1.0E+01 6.OE+02 Pr 2.5E+01 1.OE+03 Nd 2.5E+01 1.0E+03 W 3.OE+01 3.0E+01

_ Np 1.0E+01 1.OE+01 I 0*

Values in this table are taken from Regulatory Guide 1.109 except for phosphorus (fish) which is

_ adapted from NUREG/CR-1336 and silver, arsenic and .antimony.which are taken from UCRL 50564, Rev. 1, October 1972.

0*

i, 0* ° I 0* Page 100 of 155

)I

I Salem ODCM Rev. 22 FIGURE 2-1: SALEM VENTILATION EXHAUST SYSTEMS AND EFFLUENT MONITOR INTERFACES I* Simplified One Line TO ATMOSPHERE I.

I I

I 0

I.*

t/)

u, LUJ

-j 0

_1+/-

u')

Page 101 of 155

Salem ODCM Rev. 22 I FIGURE 2-2: GASEOUS RADIOACTIVE WASTE DISPOSAL SYSTEM i Simplified One Line p I I

I U

I I

LJ 0

I I

z I UV)

(I)

I VJ)

I w'

I I

0

-J I

0~

n I

Page 102 of 155 D

I

Salem ODCM Rev. 22

Table 2-1: Dose Factors For Noble Gases I Total Body Skin Gamma Air Beta Air Dose Factor Dose Factor Dose Factor Dose Factor Ki Li Mi Ni Radionuclide .Ci/m3) tCi/m3.) LCi/m3) .iCi/m3' Kr-83m 7.56E-02 1.93E+01 2.88E+02 Kr-85m 1.17E+03 1.46E+03 1.23E+03 1.97E+03 Kr-85 1.61E+01 1.34E+03 1.72E+01 1.95E+03 Kr-87 5.92E+03 9.73E+03 6.17E+03 1.03E+04 Kr-88 1.47E+04 2.37E+03 1.52E+04 2.93E+03 Kr-89 1.66E+04 1.01E+04 1.73E+04 1.06E+04 Kr-90 .1.56E+04 7.29E+03 1.63E+04 7.83E+03 Xe-131 m 9.15E+01 4.76E+02 1.56E+02 1.11E+03 I Xe-133m 2.51E+02 9.94E+02 3.27E+02 1.48E+03

7Xe-133 2.94E+02 3.06E+02 3.53E+02 1.05E+03 Xe-135m 3.12E+03 7.11E+02 3.36E+03 7.39E+02 Xe-135 1.81E+03 1.86E+03 1.92E+03 2.46E+03

< Xe-137 1.42E+03 1.22E+04 1.51E+03 1.27E+04 Xe-138 8.83E+03 4.13E+03 9.21E+03 4.75E+03

> Ar-41 8.84E+03 2.69E+03 9.30E+03 3.28E+03 14 ry U-U-3 0

~Page 103 of 155

I Salem ODCM Rev. 22 I

S Table 2-2.1: Parameters for Gaseous Alarm Setpoint Determinations - Unit 1 I

Parameter Actual Value Default Value Units Comments I

X/Q calculated 2.2E-06 sec/m 3 USNRC Salem.Safety Evaluation, Sup 3 I

VF (Plant Vent) as measured or fan curves 1.30E+05 ft 3/mjn Plant Vent - normal I

operation (Cont Purge) 3.50E+04 Containment Purge I AF coordinated 0.25 N/A Administrative allocation factor with HCGS to ensure combined releases do not I

exceed release rate limit for Ci measured N/A pci/cm3 site.

Taken from gamma spectral I

analysis ofgaseous effluent S Ki nuclide specific N/A mrem/yr per

_ _Ci/m 3

Values from Table 2-1 I z

C-I Li nuclide specific N/A mrem/yr per

ýtCi/m3 Values from Table 2-1 I CD z Mi nuclide specific N/A mrem/yr per

__Ci/m 3

Values from Table 2-1 I

Sensitivities as determified N/A cpm per Monitor-sensitivities are 1-R41 1-R12A

- pCi/m 3 or cpm per controlled under Public Service Blueprint Document I

_ _Ci/cc (PSBP) 315733 z"

0 Setpoint I-R41D calculated N/A cpm or Monitor setpoints are controlled under Public I

1-R12A ** ptCi/sec Service Blueprint Document (PSBP) 315733 I

w~l Of 0

- Automatic Isolation function is applicable in all MODES except MODE 6 I

ta_

I

(.A 0

D I

Page 104 of 155 nl I

Salem ODCM Rev. 22 Table 2-2.2: Parameters for Gaseous Alarm Setpoint Determinations - Unit 2

l. Parameter Actual Default Units I Value Value Comments X/Q Calculated 2.2E-6 sec/m 3 USNRC Salem Safety I VF as measured or Evaluation, Sup 3 Plant Vent 1.30E+05 ft 3/min Plant Vent normal operation I Cont. Purge 3.50E+04 Containment Purge I AF Coordinated with HCGS 0.25 N/A Administrative allocation factor to ensure combined releases do not exceed release rate for site.

I C, Measured N/A p.Ci/cm 3 Taken from gamma spectral analysis of gaseous effluent K, Nuclide N/A mrem/yr 3per Values from Table 2-1 I specific __ gCi/m L,. Nuclide N/A mrem/yr per Values from Table 2-1 3

l. M1 specific Nuclide

__Ci/m N/A mrem/yr per3 Values from Table 2-1 specific __Ci/m Sensitivities as N/A cpm per Monitor sensitivities are.

2-R41 determined pCi/m 3 or controlled under Public Service 2-R12A cpm per Blueprint Document (PSBP) pLCi/cc 315734 Setpoint Calculated N/A cpm or Monitor setpoints are controlled 2-R41D gtCi/sec under Public Service Blueprint 2-Rl2A ** Document (PSBP) 315734 Ho

-z"

- Automatic Isolation function is applicable in all MODES except MODE 6 r-0 1lie w-6ii Page 105 of 155

Salem ODCM Rev. 22 S Table 2-3: Controlling Locations, Pathways and Atmospheric Dispersion for Dose Calculations

Atmospheric Dispersion I

ODCM Location Pathway(s) Controlling X/Q D/Q CONTROL Age Group (sec/m3) (1/m2) I 3.11.2.1 a site boundary noble gases N/A 2.2E-06 N/A (0.83 mile, N) direct exposure I 3.11.2.1 b site boundary inhalation child 2.2E-06 N/A (0.83 mile, N) I 3.11.2.2 site boundary gamma-air N/A 2.2E-06 N/A (0.83 mile, N) beta-air I 3.11.2.3 residence/dairy** milk, ground infant 5.4E-08 2.1E-10 (4.9 miles, W) plane and inhalation I ni S

The identified controlling locations, pathways and atmospheric dispersion are from the Safety U Evaluation Report, Supplement No. 3 for the Salem Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 2 (NUREG-0517, December 1978).

0z

- Location and distance are determined from the performance of the annual land use census as I

required by ODCM CONTROL 3.12.2.

0 f-) I I.--

E/m zr'h I

0 C.)

I Z_j tn w

.- I n

00 Lj Lt-Lx.I 03 n..

w1 U- Page 106 of 155 c..i

Salem ODCM Rev. 22 Table 2-4: Pathway Dose Factors - Atmospheric Releases I* R(io), Inhalation Pathway Dose Factors - ADULT (mrem/yr per tXiCm3)

H-3 1.26E+3 1.26E+3 1.26E+3 1.26E+3 1.26E+3 1.26E+3 C-14 1.82E+4 3.41E+3 3.41E+3 3.41E+3 3.41E+3 .3.41E+3 3.41E+3 PN32. 1.32E+6 7.71E+4 - - 8.64E+4 5.01E+4 Cr-51, - 5.95E+1 2.28E+1 1.44E+4 3.32E+3 1.0OE+2 Mn-54 3.96E+4 - 9.84E+3 1.40E+6 7.74E+4 6.30E+3 Fe-55 2.46E+4 1.70E+4 - - 7.2.1E+4 6.03E+3 3.94E+3 Fe-59 1.18E+4 2.78E+4 - - 1.02E+6 1.88E+5 1.06E+4 Co-57 - 6.92E+2 - - 3.70E+5 3.14E+4 6.71E+2 Co-58 1.58E+3 - 9.28E+5 1.06E+5 2.07E+3 Co-60 - 1.15E+4 - 5.97E+6 2.85E+5 1.48E+4 Ni-63 4.32E+5 3.14E+4 - - 1.78E+5 1.34E+4 1.45E+4 Zn-65 3.24E+4 1.03E+5 6.90E+4 8.64E+5 5.34E+4 4.66E+4 Rb-86 1.35E+5 - - 1.66E+4 5.90E+4 Sr-89 3.04E+5 - - -1.40E+6 3.50E+5 8.72E+3 Sr-90 9:'92E+7 - - - 9.60E+6 7.22E+5 6.10E+6 Y-91 4.62E+5 - - 1.70E+6 3.85E+5 1.24E+4 I.(A' Zr-95 Nb-95 1.07E+5 1.41E+4 3.44E+4 7.82E+3 -

5.42E+4 7.74E+3 1.77E+6 5.05E+5 L50E+5 1.04E+5 2.33E+4 4.21E+3 Ru-103 1.53E+3 - 5.83E+3 5.05E+5 1.1OE+5 :6.:58E+2 Ru-106 6.91E+4 - 1.34E+5 9.36E+6 9.:12E+5 8.72E+3

"-r- Ag-110m 1.08E+4 1.OOE+4 - 1.97E+4 4.63E+6 3.02E+5 5.94E+3 Sb-124 3.12E+4 5.89E+2 7.55E+1 - 2.48E+6 4.06E+5 1.24E+4 Sb-125 5.34E+4 5.95E+2 5.40E+1 - 1.74E+6 1.01E+5 1.26E+4

.)

Te-125m 3.42E+3 1.58E+3 1.05E+3 1.24E+4 3.14E+5 7.06E+4 4.67E+2 (A3 Te-127m 1.26E+4 5.77E+3 3.29E+3 4.58E+4 9.60E+5 1.50E+5 1,:57E+3 Te-129m 9.76E+3 4167E+3 3.44E+3 3.66E+4 1.16E+6 3.83E+-5 1:58E+3 1-131 2.52E+4 3.58E+4 1.19E+7 6.13E+4 - 6.28E+3 2.05E+4 1-!132 1.16E+3 3.26E+3 1.14E+5 5.18E+3 - 4.06E+2 1.16E+3 1-133 8.64E+3 1.48E+4 2.15E+6 2.58E+4 - 8.88E+3 4652E+3 Ii 1-134 6.44E+2 1.73E+3 2.98E+4 2.75E+3 - 1.01E+O 6.15E+2 0 1435 2.68E+3 6.98E+3 4.48E+5 1.11E+4 - 5.25E+3 2.57E+3 Cs- 134 3.73E+5 8.48E+5 - 2.87E+5 9.76E+4 1.04E+.4 7.28E+5

>- Cs-136 3.90E+4 1.46E+5 8.56E+4 1.20E+4 1.17E+4 1.1OE+5 Cs-137 4.78E+5 6.21E+5 2.22E+5 7.52E+4 8.40E+3 4.28E+5 Ba-140 3.90E+4 4.90E+1 1.67E+1 1.27E+6 2.18E+5 2.57E+3 0 Ce-141 1.99E+4 1.35E+4 6.26E+3 3.62E+5 1.20E+5 1.53E+3 Ce-144 3.43E+6 1.43E+6 8.48E+5 :7.78E+6 8.16E+5 1.84E+5

-w Pr-143 9.36E+3 3.75E+3 2.16E+3 2.81E+5 2.OOE+5 4.64E+2 Nd-147 5.27E+3 6;1OE+3 3.56E+3 2.21 E+5 I 173E+5 3.65E+2 L.G D

...2 Page 107 of 155

I Salem ODCM Rev. 22 I

Table 2-4 (cont'd)

Pathway Dose Factors - Atmospheric Releases R(io), Inhalation Pathway Dose Factors - TEENAGER I (mrem/yr per ptC'/m3)

I H-3 1.27E+3 -1.27+3 1.27E+3 1.27E+3 1.27E+3 8.27E+3

C-14 2.60E+4 4.87E+3 4.87E+3 4.87E+3 4.87E+3 4.87E+3 4.87E+3 P-32 Cr-51 1.89E+.6

1. 10E+5 ....

7.50E+1 3.07E+1

-9.8+

2.10OE+4 3.00E+3 7164 1.35E+2 I

Mn-54 5.11 E+4 Fe-55 3.34E+4 2.38E+4 1.27E+4 1.98 E+6 1.24E+5 6.68E+4 6.39E+3 8.40E+3 5.54E+3 I

Fe-59 1.59E+4 3.70E+4 - -1.53E+6 1.78E+5 1.43E+4 Co-57 Co-58

- 6.92E+2 2.07E+3

- 5M86E+5 1.34E+6 3.14E+4 9.52E+4 9.20E+2 2.78E+3 I

Co-60 Ni-63 Zn-65 5.80E+5 3.86E+4 1.51E+4 4.34E+4 1.34E+5 -

8.64E+4

8.72E+6 3.07E+5 1.24E+6 2.59E+5 1.42E+4 4.66E+4 1.98E+4 I1.98E+4 6.24E+4 U

Rb-86 - 1.90E+5 - - 1.77E+4 8.40E+4 Sr-89 Sr-90 4.34E+5 1.08E+8 2.42E+6 1.65E+7 3.71E+5 7.65E+5 1.25E+4 6.68E+6 I

Y-91 6.61E+5 2.94E+6 Zr-95.

Nb-95 1.46E+5 1.86E+4.

4.58E+4 1.03E+4 6.74E+4 1.OOE+4 2.69E+6 7.51E+5 4.09E+5 1.49E+5 9.68E+4 1.77E+4 3:1.5E+4 5.66E+3 I

Vi) Ru-103 2.1OE+3 7.43E+3 7.83E+5

- 1.09E+5 8.96E+2 Ru-106 Ag-1O1m 9.84E+4 1.38E+4 1.31E+4 1.90E+5 2.50E+4 1.61E+7 6.75E+6 9.60E+5 2.73E+5 1.24E+4 7.99E+3 I Sb-124 Sb-125 4.30E+4 7.38E+4 7.94E+2, 8.08E+2

.9.76E+1 7.04E+1

- 3.85E+6 2.74E+6 3.98E+5 9.92E+4 1.68E+4 1.72E+4 I

(-) Te-125m 4.88E+3 2.24E+3 1.40E+3 - 5.36E+5 7.50E+4 6.67E+2 z

0i-Te-127m Te-1l29m 1.80E+4 1.39E+4 8.16E+3 6.58E+3 4.38E+3 4.58E+3 6.54E+4 5.19E+4 1.66E+6 1.98E+6

!'59E+5 4.05E+5 2:18E+3 2.25E+3. I 1-131. 3.54E+4 4.91E+4 1.46E+7 8.40E+4 6.49E+3 2.64E+4 1-132 1-133

.1.59E+3 1.22E+4 4.38E+3 2.05E+4 1.51.E+5 2.92E+6 6.92E+3 3.59E+4 -

".1.27E+3 1.03E+4 1.58E+3 6.22E+3

.I 0 1-134 8.88E+2 2.32E+3 3.95E+4 3.66E+3 - 2,04E+i 8.40E+2 Zi-wy 1-135 Cs-134 3.70E+3 5.02E+5 9.44E+3 1.13E+6 6.21E+5 1.49E+4 3.75E+5 1.46E+5 6.95E+3 9.76E+3 3.49E+3 5.49E+5 I

Cs-136 5.15E+4 1.94E+5 1.1OE+5 1.78E+4 lt09E+4 1.37E+5 Cs-137 Ba-140 6.70E+5 5;47E+4 8.48E+5 6.70E+1 3.04E+5 2.28E+1 1.21E+5 2.03E+6 8.48E+3 2.29E+5 3.11E+5 3.52E+3 I

Ce-141 2.84E+4 1,90E+4 - 8.88E+3 6.14E+5 1.26E+5 2.17E+3 U-w Ce-144 Pr-143 4.89E+6 1.34E+4 2.02E+6 5.31E+3 1.21E+6 3.09E+3 1.34E+7 4.83E+5 8.64E+5 2.14E+5 2.62E+5 6.62E+2 I

Nd-147 7.86E+3 8.56E+3 - 5.02E+3 3.72E+5 1.82E+5 5.13E+2 z0 0~

Vi) wd I

Page 108 of 155 Q*

D I

Salem ODCM Rev. 22 Table 2-4 (cont'd)

Pathway Dose Factors - Atmospheric Releases 1I R(io), Inhalation Pathway Dose Factors - CHILD (mrem/yr per AtCi/m3)

H-3 -1. 12E+3 1.12E+3 ...1.12E+3-- 1. 12E+3 1.12E+3 1.12E+3, C-14 3.59E+4 6.73E+3 6.73E+3 6.73E+3 6.73E+3 6.73E+3 '6.M3+3 P-32 2.60E+6 774E5 4.22E+4 9.88E+4 Cr-51 8.55E+I 2.43E+t 1I.70E+4 1.08E+3 1.54E+2 Mr_-54 I 4.29E+4 - 1.OOE+4 1.58E+6 2.29E+4 9.51E+3 Fe-55 4.74E+4 2.52E+4 - - 1.11E+5 2.87E+3 7.77E+3 Fe-59 2.07E+4 3.34E+4 - 1.27E+6 7.07E+4 1.67E+4 Co-57 9.03E+2 - 5.07E+5 1.32E+4 1.07E+3 Co-58 1.77E+3 - 1.11E+6 3.44E+4 3.16E+3 Co-60 1.31E+4 - 7.07E+6 9.62E+4 2.26E+4 Ni-63 8.21E+5 4.63E+4 - 2.75E+5 6.33E+3 2.80E+4 Zn-65 :4.26E+4 1.13E+5 - 7.14E+4 9.95E+5 1.63E+4 7.03E+4 Rb-86 1.98E+5 - 7.99E+3 1.14E+5 Sr-89 5.99E+5 - 2.16E+6 1.67E+5 1.72E+4 Sr-90 1.01E+8 - 1.48E+7 3.43E+5 6.44E-6 Y-91 9.14E+5 -

2.63E+6 1.84E+5 2.44E+4 I* LI)

Zr-95

Nb-95 Ru-103 1.90E+5 2.35E+4 2.79E+3 4.18E+4 9.18E+3 5.96E+4 8.62E+3 7.03E+3 2.23E+6 6.14E+5 6.62E+5 6.11E+4 3.70E+4 4.48E+4 3.70E+4 6.55E+3 1.07E+3 Ru-106 1.36E+5 - - 1.84E+5 1.43E+7 4.29E+5 1.69E+4 Ag-110m 1.69E+4 1.14E+4 2.12E+4 5.48E+6 1.OOE+5 9.14E+3 Sb-124 5.74E+4 7.40E+2 1.26E+2 - 3.24E+6 1.64E+5 2.OOE+4 Q) Sb-125 9.84E+4 7.59E+2 9.10E+1 - 2.32E+6 4.03E+4 2.07E+4 Te-125m 6.73E+3 2.33E+3 1.92E+3 - 4.77E+5 3.38E+4 9.14E+2 Te-127m 2.49E+4 8.55E+3 6.07E+3 6.36E+4 1.48E+6 7.14E+4 3.02E+3 Te-129m 1.92E+4 6.85E+3 6.33E+3 5.03E+4 -1.76E+6 1.82E+5 3.04E+3 1-131 4.81E+4 4.81E+4 1.62E+7 7.88E+4. 2.84E+3 2.73E+4 U-1-132 2.12E+3 4.07E+3 1.94E+5 6.25E+3 - 3.22E+3 1.88E+3 1-133 1.66E+4 2.03E+4 3.85E+6 3.38E+4 5.48E+3 7.70E+3 1-134 1.17E+3 2.16E+3 5.07E+4 3.30E+3 9.55E+2 9.95E+2 1-135 4.92E+3 8.73E+3 7.92E+5 1.34E+4 4.44E+3 4.14E+3 0 Cs-134 6.51E+5 1.01E+6 3.30E+5 1.21E+5 3.85E+3 2.25E+5 Cs-136 6.51E+4 1.71E+5 9.55E+4 1.45E+4 4.18E+3 1I16E+5 Cs-137 9.07E÷5 8.25E+5 2.82E+5 1.04E+5 3.62E+3 1.28E+5 C13 Ba-140 7.40E+4 6.48E+1 2.t1E~l 1.74E+6 1.02E+5 4.33E+3 FL Ce-141 Ce-144 Pr-143 3.92E+4 6.77E+6 1.85E+4 1.95E+4 2; 12E+6 5.55E+3 8.55E+3 1.17E+6 3.OOE+3 5.44E+5 1.20E+7 4.33E+5

'5.66E+4 3.89E+5 9.73E+4 2.90E+3 3.61E+5 9.14E+2 Nd-147 1.08E+4 8.73E+3 - 4.81E+3 3.28E+5 8.21E+4 6.81E+2 Page 109 of 155

I Table 2-4 (cont'd)

Salem ODCM Rev. 22 I

a Pathway Dose Factors - Atmospheric Releases R(io), Inhalation Pathway Dose Factors - INFANT (mrem/yr per gCi/m3)

I H-3 6.47E+2 I6.47E+2 h- 6 ne 6.47E+2 6.47E+2 6.47E+2 T,,

6.47ýE+2 I

5.31E+3 6.47EE+2 C-14 P-32 Cr-51 2.65E+4 2.03E+6 5.31E+3 1.12E+5 5.31E+3 5.75E+1 1.32E+1 5.31E+3

-1.28E+4 5.31E+3 1.61E+4 3.57E+2 5.31E+3 7.74E+4 8.95E+I I

Mn-54 Fe-55 Fe-59 1.97E+4 1.36E+4 2.53E+4 1.17E+4 2.35E+4 4.98E+3 1.OOE+6 8.69E+4 7.06E+3 1.09E+3 4.98E+3 3.33E+3 I 1.02E+6 2.48E+4 9.48E+3 Co-57 Co-58 6.51E+2 1.22E+3 -

3.79E+5 7.77E+5 4.86E+3 1.11E+4 6.41E+2 1.82E+3 I Co-60 - 8.02E+3 - 4.51E+6 3.19E+4 1.18E+4 Ni-63 Zn-65 3.39E+5, 1.93E+4 2.04E+4 6.26E+4 3.25E+4 2.09E+5 6.47E+5 2.42E+3 5.14E+4 1.16E+4 3.11 E+4 I

Rb-86 - 1.90E+5 - - - 3.04E+3 8.82E+4 Sr-89 Sr-90 3.98E+5 4.09E+7 2.03E+6 1.12E+7 6.40E+4 1.31E+5 1.14E+4 2.59E+6 I

Y-91_ 5.88E+5 - - - 2.45E+6 7.03E+4 1.57E+4 S

Zr-95 Nb-95 1.15E+5 1.57E+4 2.79E+4 6.43E+3 3.11E+4 4.72E+3 1.75E+6 4.79E+5 2.17E+4 1.27E+4 2.03E+4 3.78E+3 I

-0 Ru-103 2.02E+3 - - 4.24E+3 5.52E+5 1.61E+4 6.79E+2 0

U Ru- 106 Ag-0mrn 8.68E+4 9.98E+3 7.22E+3 -

1.07E+5 1.09E+4 1.16E+7 3.67E+6 1.64E+5 3.30E+4 1.09E+4 5.OOE+3 I

Sb-124 3.79E+4 5.56E+2 1.01E+2 2.65E+6 5.91E+4 (D

H-

"7 F-3 Sb-125 Te-125m 5.17E+4, 4.76E+3 4.77E+2 1.99E+3 6.23E+l 1.62E+3 1.64E+6 4.47E+5 1.47E+4 1.29E+4 1.20E+4 1.09E+4 6.58E+2 I

Te-127m 1.67E+4 6.90E+/-3 4.87E+3 3.75E+4 1.31E+6 2.73E+4 2.07E+3 0

z Te-129m 1-131 1.41E+4 3.79E+4 6.09E+3 4.44E+4 5.47E+3 1.48E+7 3.18E+4 5.18E+4

.1.68E+6 6.90E+4 1.06E+3 2.23E+3 1.96E+4 I 0 1-132 1.69E+3 3.54E+3 1.69E+5 3.95E+5 1.90E+3 1.26E+3 1-133 1-134 1.32E+4.

9.21E+2 1.92E+4 1.88E+3 3.56E+6 4.45E+4 2.24E+4 2.09E+3 .

2.61E+3 1.29E+3.

5.60E+3 6.65E+2 I 0

z 1-135 Cs-134 3.86E+3 3.96E+5 7.60E+3 7.03E+5 "

6.96E+5 8.47E+3 1.90E+5 7.97E+4 1.83E+3 1.33E+3 2.77E+3 7.45E+4 I Cs-136 4.83E+4 1.35E+5 5.64E+4 1.188E+4 1,43E+3 5.29E+4 Cs-137 5.49E+5 6.12E+5 1.72E+5 7.13E+4 1.33E+3 4.55E+4 0

0 Ba-140 Ce-141 5.60E+4 2.77E+4 5.60E+1 1.67E+4 1.34E+1 5.25E+3 1.60E+6 5.17E+5 3.84E+4 2.16E+4 2.90E+3 1.99E+3 I

I 0-.

0,I 0

Ce-144 3.19E+6 1.21E+6 -_5.38E+5. 9.84E+6 1.48E+5 1.76E+5 L- Pr-143 1.40E+4 5.24E+3 - 1.97E+3 4.33E+5 3.72E+4 6.99E+2 V-Nd-147 7.94E+3 '8.13E+3 - 3.15E+3 3.22E+5 3.12E+4 5.O0E+2

'I 03 Page 110 of 155 9v I

Salem ODCM Rev. 22 Table 2-4 (cont'd)

I* Pathway Dose Factors - Atmospheric Releases R(io), Grass-Cow-Milk Pathway Dose Factors - ADULT (mrem/yr per CXi/m3) for H-3 and C-14 (m2

mrern/yr per jtCi/sec) for others Ir 41 H-3 - 7.63E+2 7.63E+2 7.63E+2 7.63E+2 7.63E+2 7.63E+2 C-14 3.63E+5 7.26E+4 7.26E+4 7.26E+4 7.26E+4 7.26E+4 7.26E+4 P-32 1.71E+10 1.06E+9 - - 1.92E+9 6.60E+8 Cr-51 - 1.71E+4 6.30E+3 3.80E+4 7.20E+6 2.86E+4 Mn-54 - 8.40E+6 2.50E+6 2.57E+7 1.60E+6 Fe-55 2.5 1E+7 1.73E+7 9.67E+6 9.95E+6 4.04E+6 Fe-59 2.98E+7 7.OOE+7 1.95E+7 2.33E+8 2.68E+7 Co-57 - 1.28E+6 - 3.25E+7 2.13E+6 Co-58 4.72E+6 - 9.57E+7 1.06E+7 Co-60 - 1.64E+7 - 3.08E+8 3.62E+7 Ni-63 6.73E+9 4.66E+8 - - 9.73E+7 2.26E+8 Zn-65 1.37E+9 4.36E+9 2.92E+9 2.75E+9 1.97E+9

.Rb-86 2.59E+9 - - - 5.11E+8 1.21E+9 Sr-89 1.45E+9 2.33E+8 4.16E+7 Sr-90 4.68E+10 1.35E+9 1.15E+10 Y-91 8.60E+3 - - 4:73E+6 2.30E+2 I~I Zr-95 Nb-95 Ru-103 9.46E+2 8.25E+4 1.02E+3 3.03E+2 4.59E+4 4.76E+2 4.54E+4 9.62E+5 2.79E+8 2.05E+2 2.47E+4 3.89E+3 - 1.19E+5 4.39E+2 I. Ru-106 Ag-1 lOim 2.04E+4 5.83E+7 5.39E+7 3.94E+4 1.06E+8 1.32E+6 2.20E+10 2.58E+3 3.20E+7 Sb-124 2.57E+7 4.86E+5 6.24E+4 2.OOE+7 7.3 1E+8 1.02E+7 Sb-125 2.04E+7 2.28E+5 2.08E+4 - 1.58E+7 2.25E+8 4.86E+6 C-) Te-125m 1.63E+7 5.90E+6 4.90E+6 6.63E+7 - 6.50E+7 2.18E+6 Te-127m 4.58E+7 1.64E+7 1.17E+7 1.86E+8 1.54E+8 5.58E+6 Te-129m 6.04E+7 2.25E+7 2.08E+7 2.52E+8 - 3.04E+8 9.57E+6 1-131 2.96E+8 4.24E+8 1.39E+11 7.27E+8 - 1.12E+8 2.43E+8 1-132 1.64E-1 4.37E-1 1.53E+1 6.97E-1 - 8.22E-2 1.53E-1

.1-133 3.97E+6 6.90E+6 1.01E+9 1.20E+7 6.20E+/-6 2.1OE+6 I;I 1-134 .....

1-135 1.39E+4 3.63E+4 2.40E+6 5.83E+4 4.10E+4 1.34E+4 LJ Cs-134 5.65E+9 1.34E+10 - 4.35E+9 1.44E+9 2.35E+8 1.10E+10 Cs-136 2.61E+8 1.03E+9 - 5.74E+8 7.87E+7 1.17E+8 7.42E+8 10Z Cs-137 7.38E+9 1.01E+10 3.43E+9 1.14E+9 1.95E+8 6.61E+9 Ba-140 2.69E+7 3.38E+4 - 1.15E+4 1.93E+4 5.54E+7 1.76E+6 Ce-141 4.84E+3 3.27E+3 - 1.52E+3 - 1.25E+7 3.71E+2 Ce-144 3.58E+5 1.50E+5 8.87E+4 Ii" 1.21E+8 1.92E+4 U-Pr-143 1.59E+2 6.37E+1 - 3.68E+1 6.96E+5 7.88E+O Nd-147 9.42E+1 1.09E+2 - 6.37E+1 5.23E+5 6.52E+O LL ry Page 111 of 155

I Salem ODCM Rev. 22 I

Table 2-4 (cont'd)

Pathway Dose Factors - Atmospheric Releases R(io), Grass-Cow-Milk Pathway Dose.Factors - TEENAGER I (mrem/yr per tCi/m3) for H-3 and C-14 (m2

mrem/yr per pCi/sec) for others I

IH-3 9.94E+2 9.94E+2 9.94E+2 9.94E+2 9.94E+2 9.94E+2 C-14 P-32 6.70E+5 3;15E+10 1.34E+5 1.95E+9 1.34E+5 1.34E+5 1.34E+5 1.34E+5 2-.65E+9 1.34E+5 1.22E+9 I Cr-51 Mn-54 1.40E+7 2.78E+4 1.1OE+4 4.17E+6 7.13E+4 8.40E+6 2.87E+7 5.OOE+4 2.78E+6 I Fe-55 4.45E+7 3.16E+7 - 2.OOE+7 1.37E+7 7.36E+6 Fe-59 Co-57 Co-58 5.20E+7 1.21E+8 2.25E+6 7.95E+6 -

3.82E+7 2.87E+8 4.19E+7 10E+8 4.68E+7 3.76E+6 1.83E+7 I

Co-60 Ni-63 1.18E+10 2.78E+7 8.35E+8

- - 3.62E+8 1.33E+8 6.26E+7 4.01E+8 I Zn-65 2.11E+9 7.31E+9 - 4.68E+9 - 3.1OE+9 3.41E+9 Rb-86 Sr-89 2.67E+9 4.73E+9 -

7.00E+8 3.18E+8 2.22E+9 7.66E+7 I Sr-90 9.92E+7 - - 9.60E+6 7.22E+5. 6.1OE+6 Y-91 Zr-95 1.58E+4 1.65E+3 5.22E+2 7.67E+2 6.48E+6 1.20E+6 4.24E+2 3.59E+2 I Nb-95 1.41E+5 7.80E+4 7.57E+4 - 3.34E+8 4.30E+4 I

(')

0 Ru-103 1.81E+3 - - 6.40E+3 - 1.52E+5 7.75E+2 Ru-106 3.75E+4 - - 7.23E+4 - 1.80E+6 4.73E+3 z Ag-lOrm 9.63E+7 9.11E+7 1.74E+8 .2.56E+10 5.54E+7 "H-Sb-124 Sb-125 4.59E+7 3.65E+7 8.46E+5 3,99E+5 1.04E+5 3.49E+4 4.01E+7 3.21E+7 9.25E+8 2.84E+8 1.79E+7 8.54E+6 I Te-125m 3.00E+7 1.08E+7 8.39E+6 - - 8.86E+7 4.02E+6 0

V_)

w

.Te-127m Te-129m 8.44E+7*

1.11E+8 2.99E+7 4.1OE+7 2.01E+7 3.57E+7 3.42E+8 4.62E+8 2.1OE+8 4.15E+8

.OOE+7 1.75E+7 I 1-131 5.38E+8 7.53E+8 2.20E+11 1.30E+9 " 1.49E+8 4.04E+8 1-132 1-133 2.90E-1 7.24E+6 7.59E-1 1.23E+7 2.56E+1 1.72E+9 1.20E+O 2.15E+7 3.31E-1 9.30E+6 2.72E-1 3.75E+6 I 1-134 ..-

<(

0.

w 1-135 2.47E+4 6.35E+4 4.08E+6 1.OOE+5 - 7.03E+4 2.35E+4 z Cs-134 9.81E+9 2.31E+10 7.34E+9 2.80E+9 2.87E+8 1.07E+10 Cs-136 4.45E+8 1.75E+9 9.53E+8 1.50E+8 1.41E+8 1.18E+9 C/)

J.- Cs-137 1.34E+10 1.78E+1 0 6.06E+9 2.35E+9 2.53E+8 6.20E+9 c.._. Ba-140 4.85E+7 5.95E+4 -2:02E+4 4.OOE+4 7.49E+7 3.13E+6 u-0 Ce-141* 8.87E+3 1.35E+4 2.79E+3 1.69E+7 6.81E+2 Ld_

Ce-144 6.58E+5 2.72E+5 - 1.63E+5 1.66E+8 3.54E+4 w

ý,I Pr-143 Nd-147 2.92E+2 1.81E+2 1.17E+2 1.97E+2 6.77E+1 1.16E+2 9.61E+5 7.11E+5 1.45E+1 1.18E+l I

0 C-w I

Page 112 of 155 C1n D

I

Salem ODCM Rev. 22 Table 2-4 (cont'd)

Pathway Dose Factors - Atmospheric Releases I1 R(io), Grass-Cow-Milk Pathway Dose Factors - CHILD (mrem/yrper lCi/m3) for H-3 and C-14 (m2

rnrem/yr per itCi/sec) for others H-3 1 57E+3 1.57E+3 1.57E+3 1.57E+3 1.57E+3 1.57E+3 C-14 1.65E+6 3.29E+5 3.29E+5 3.29E+5 3.29E+5 3.29E+5 3.29E+5 P-32 7.77E+10 3.64E+9 - 2.15E+9 3.OOE+9 Cr-51 - - 5.66E+4 L.55E+4 1.03E+5 5.41E+6 1.02E+5 Mn-54 2.09E+7 5.87E+6 1.76E+7 .5.58E+6 Fe-55 1.12E+8 5.93E+7 - 3.35E+7 1.10E+7 1.84E+7 Fe-59 1.20E+8 1.95E+8 - 5.65E+7 2.03E+8 9.71E+7 Co-57 - 3.84E+6 - 3.14E+7 7.77E+6 Co-58 1.21E+7 - 7.08E+7 3.72E+7 Co-60 - 4.32E+7 - 2.3 9E+8 1.27E+8 Ni-63 2.96E+10 1.59E+9 - 1.07E+8 1.01E+9 Zn-65 4.13E+9 1.10E+10 6.94E+9 1.93E+9 6.85E+9, Rb-86 - 8.77E+9 - 5.64E+8 5.39E+9§ Sr-89 6.62E+9 ".- 2.56E+8 1.89E+8 Sr-90 1.12E+11 - 1.51E+9 2.83E+10 Y-91 3.91E+4 - - 5.21E+6 1.04E+3 Zr-95 3.84E+3 8.45E+2 1.21E+3 - 8.81E+5 7.52E+2 Nb-95 3.18E+5 1.24E+5 - 1.16E+5 - 2.29E+8 8.84E+4 Cn Ru-103 4.29E+3 1-.08E+4 - 1.11E+5, .1.65E+3 Ru-106 9.24E+4 - 1.25E+5 - 1.44E+6 1.15E+4 Ag-ll0m 2.09E+8 .1.41E+8 - 2.63E+8 - 1.68E+10 1.13E+8 Sb-124 1.09E+8 1.41E+8 2.40E+5 - 6.03E+7 6.79E+8 3.81E+7 Sb-125 8.70E+7 1.41E+6 8.06E+4 - 4.85E+7 2.08E+8 1.82E+7 Te-125m 7.38E+7 2.OOE+7 2.07E+7 - - 7.12E+7 9.84E+6 Te-127m 2.08E+8 5.60E+7 4.97E+7 5.93E+8 - 1.68E+8 2.47E+7 0

Te-129m 2.72E+8 7.61E+7 8.78E+7 8.OOE+8 - 3.32E+8 4.23E+7

<~

U-Ln 1-131: 1.30E+9 1.31E+9 4.34E+11 2.15E+9 - 1.17E+8 7.46E+8 1-132 6.86E-1 1.26E+0 5.85E+1 ,1.93E+0 - 1.48E+O 5.80E-1 1-133 1.76E+7 2.1 SE+7 4.04E+9 3.63E+7 - 8.77E+6 8.23E+6 1-134 ..... -

1-135 5.84E+4 1.05E+5 9.30E+6 l.61E+5 - 8.OOE+4 4.97E+4 w

Cs-134 2.26E+10 3.71E+10 - 1.15E+10 4.13E+9 2.OOE+8 '7.83E+9 Cs-136 1.00E+9 2.76E+9 - 1.47E+9 2.19E+8 9.70E+7 1.79E+9 Cs-137 3.22E+10 3.09E+10 - 1.01E+10 3.62E+9 1.93E+8 4.55E+9 Cn Ba-140 1.17E+8 1.03E+5 - 3.34E+4 6.12E+4 5.94E+7 6.84E+6 Ce-141 2.19E+4 1.09E+4 - 4.78E+3 - 1.36E+7 1.62E+3 Ce-144 1.62E+6 5.09E+5 - 2.82E+5 - 1.33E+8. 8.66E+4 Pr-143 7.23E+2 2.17E+2 - 1.17E+2 - 7.80E+5 3.59E+1 rK Nd-147 4.45E+2 3.60E+2 - 1.98E+2 - 5.71E+5 2.79E+1 Page 113 of 155 (03'

I Salem ODCM Rev. 22 I

Table 2-4 (cont'd)

S Pathway Dose Factors - Atmospheric Releases R(io), Grass-Cow-Milk Pathway Dose Factors - INFANT I (mrem/yr per ptCi/m3) for H-3 and C-14 (m2

mrem/yr per p.Ci/sec) for others I

H-3 C-14 3.23E+6 2.38E+3 6.89E+5 2.38E+3 6.89E+5

.2.38E+3 6.89E+5 2.38E+3 6.89E-5 2.38E+3 6.89E+5 2.38E+3 6.89E+5 I P-32 1.60E+1 1 9.42E+9 - - 2.17E+9 6.21E+9 Cr-51 Mn-54 3.89E+7 1.05E+5 2.30E+4 8.63E+6 2.05E+5 4.71E+6 1.43E+7 1.61E+5 8.83E+6 I Fe-55 1.35E+8 8.72E+7 - 4.27E+7 1.11E+7 2.33E+7 Fe-59 Co-57 2.25E+8 3.93E+8 8.95E+6 1.16E+8 1.88E+8 3.05E+7 1.55E+8 1.46E+7 I Co-58 .2.43E+7 - 6.05E+7 6.06E+7 Co-60 Ni-63 3.49E+10 8.81E+7 2.16E+9 2.1OE+8 1.07E+8 2.08E+8 1.21E+9- I Zn-w65 5.55E+9 1.90E+10 - 9.23E+9 - 1.61E+10 8.78E+9 Rb-86 Sr-89 1.26E+10 2.22E+10

.... 5.69E+8 2.59E+8 1.1OE+:10 3.61E+8 I Sr-90 1.22E+11 - - - 1.52E+9 3.10E+10 Y-91 Zr-95, 7.33E+4 6.83E+3 1.66E+3 1.79E+3 5.26E+6 8.28E+5 1.95E+3 1.18E+3 I Nb-95 5.93E+5 2.44E+5 1.75E+5 - 2.06E+8 1.41E+5 0

(.9 Z

Ru-103 Ru-106 8.69E+3 1.90E+5 -

1.81-E+4 2.25E+5 1.06E+5 1.44E+6 2.91E+3 2.38E+4 I

Ag-11Om 3.86E+8 2.82E+8 4.03E+8 - 1.46E+10 .1.86E+8 z

Sb-124 Sb-125 2.09E+8 1.49E+8 3.08E+6 1.45E+6 5.56E+5 1.87E+5 1.31E+8 9.38E+7 6.46E+8 1.99E+8 6.49E+7 3.07E+7 I,

Te-125m 1.51E+8 5.04E+7 5.07E+7 - - 7.18E+7 2.04E+7 C-)

w 0

Te-127m Te-129m 4.21E+8 5.59E+8 1.40E+8

-1.92E+8 1.22E+8 2.15E+8 1.04E+9 1.40E+9

1.70E+8 3.34E+8 5.10E+7 8.62E+7 I

1-131 2.72E+9 3.21E+9 1.05E+12 3.75E+9 - 1.15E+8 1.41E+9 z"

1-132 1-133 1.42E+O 3.72E+7 2.89E+O 5.41E+7 1.35E+2 9.84E+9 3.22E+O

6.36E+7 2.34E+O 9.16E+6 1.03E+O 1.58E+7 I

1-134 - 1.01E-9 - - -

I U-

"T" U-1-135 1.21E+5 2.41E+5 2.16E+7 2.69E+5 - 8.74E+4 8.80E+4 rD 0 Cs-134 3.65E+10 6.80E+l10 1.75E+10 7.18E+9 1.85E+8 6.87E+9 0

Cs-136 1.96E+9 5.77E+9 2.30E+9 4.70E+8 8.76E+7 2.15E+9 ro0 I--

0<:D Cs-137 Ba-140 5.15E+10 2.41E+8 6.02E+l10 2.41E+5 1.62E+10 5.73E+4 6.55E+9 1.48E+5 1.88E+8 5.92E+7 4.27E+9 1.24E+7 I Ce-141 4.33E+4 2.64E+4 *8.15E+3 _ _ 1.37E+7 3.11E+3 a--

0 0

Ce-144 Pr-143 2.33E+6 1.49E+3 9.52E+5 5.59E+2 -

3.85E+5 2.08E+2 1.33E+8 7.89E+5 1.30E+5 7.41E+1 I

Nd-147 8.82E+2 9.06E+2 3.49E+2 - 5.74E+5 5.55E+1 I

0 Page 114 of 155 I

Salem ODCM Rev. 22 r Table 2-4 (cont'd)

Pathway Dose Factors - Atmospheric Releases I* R(io), Vegetation Pathway Dose Factors - ADULT (mrem/yr per piCi/m3) for H-3 and C-14 (m2

mrem/yr per /Ci/sec) for others H-3 - 2.26E+3 2.26E+3 2.26E+3 2.26E+3 2.26E+3 2.26E+3 C-14 8.97E+5 .1.79E+5 1.79E+5. 1.79E+5 1.79E+5 1.79E+5 1.79E+5 P-32 1.40E+9 8.73E+7 - - 1.58E+8 5.42E+7 Cr-51 - 2.79E+4 1.03E+4 6.19E+4 1.17E+7 4.66E+4 Mn-54 -3.11E+8 - 9.27E+7 - 9.54E+8 5.94E+7 Fe-55 2.09E+8 1 .45E+8 - - 8.06E+7 8.29E+7 3.37E+7 Fe-59 1.27E+8 2.99E+8 - - 8.35E+7 9.96E+8 1.14E+8 Co-57 1.17E+7 - - 2.97E+8 1.95E+7 Co-58 3.09E+7 - - - 6.26E+8 6.92E+7 Co-60 1.67E+8 - - - 3.14E+9 3.69E+8 Ni-63 1.04E+10 7.21E+8 - - - 1.50E+8 3.49E+8 Zn-65 3.17E+8 1.01E+9 - 6.75E+8 - 6.36E+8 4.56E+8 Rb-86 . 2.19E+8 - - 4.32E+7 1.02E+8 Sr-89 9.96E+9 - - - 1.60E+9 2.86E+8 Sr-90 6.05E+11 - - - 1.75E+10 1.48E+10 Y-91 5.13E+6 - - - 2.82E+9 1.37E+5 Zr-95 1.19E+6 3.81E+5 - 5.97E+5 - 1.21E+9 2.58E+5 Nb-95 1.42E+5 7.91E+4 - 7.81E+4 - 4.80E+8 4.25E+4 Ru-103 4.80E+6 - 1.83E+7 - 5.61E+8 2.07E+6 Ru-106 1.93E+8 - - 3.72E+8 - 1.25E+10 2.44E+7 Ag-11Om 1.06E+7 9.76E+6 I. Sb-124 Sb-125 1.04E+8 1.36E+8 1.96E+6 1.52E+6 2.52E+5 1.39E+5 1.92E+7 -

8.08E+7 1.05E+8 3.98E+9 2.95E+9 1.50E+9 5.80E+6 4.11E+7 3.25E+7 Te-125m 9.66E+7 3.50E+7 2.90E+7 3.93E+8 - 3.86E+8 1.29E+7 Te-127m 3.49E+8 1.25E+8 8.92E+7 *1.42E-9" - 1.17E+9

4.26E+7 Te-129m 2.55E+8 9.50E+7 8.75E+7 1.06E+9 - 1.28E+9 4.03E+7 1-131 8.09E+7 1.16E+8 3.79E+10 1.98E+8 - 3.05E+7 6.63E+7 1-132 5.74E+1 1.54E+2 .5.38E+3 2.45E+2 - 2.89E+1 5.38E+1.

0 1-133 2.12E+6 3.69E+6 5.42E+8 6.44E+6 3.3 1E+6 1.12E+6 1-134 '1.06E-4 2.88E-4 5.00E-3 4.59E-4 - 2.51E-7 1.03E-4 1-135 4.08E+4 1.07E+5 7.04E+6 1.71E+5 - 1.21E+5 3.94E+4 Cs-134 4.66E+9 1.11E+10 - 3.59E+9 1.19E+9 1.94E+8 9.07E+9 Cs-136 4.20E+7 1.66E+8 - 9.24E+7 1.27E+7 1.89E+7 1.19E+8 Cs-137 6.36E+9 8.70E+9 - 2.95E+9 9.8 1E+8 1.68E+8 5.70E+9 Ba-140 1.29E+8 1.62E+5 - 5.49E+4 9.25E+4 2.65E+8 8.43E+6 Ce-141 1.96E+5 1.33E+5 - 6.17E+4 - 5.08E+8 1.51E+4 Ce-144 3.29E+7 1.38E+7 - 8.16E+6 - 1.11E+10 1.77E+6 Pr-143 6.34E+4 2.54E+4 - 1.47E+4 - 2.78E+8 3.14E+3 0

Nd-147 3.34E+4 3.86E+4 - 2.25E+4 - 1.85E+8 2.3 1E+3 Page 115 of 155

I Salem ODCM Rev. 22 I

Table 2-4, (cont'd)

S Pathway Dose Factors - Atmospheric Releases R(io), Vegetation Pathway Dose Factors - TEENAGER I (mrem/yr per btCi/m3) for H-3 and C-14 (m2

mrem/yr per ýtCi/sec) for others I

mf it'll ['

K H-3 C-14 1.45E+6 2.59E+3 2.91E+5 2.59E+3 2.91E+5 2.59E+3 2.91E+5 2.59E+3 2.91E+5 2.59E+3 2.91E+5 2.59E+3 2.91E+5 I P-32 1.61E+9 9.96E+7 - - - 1.35E+8 6.23E+7 Cr-51 Mn-54 -

4.52E+8 3.44E+4 1,36E+4 1.35E+8 8.85E+4 1.04E+7 9.27E+8 6.20E+4 8.97E+7 I Fe-55 3.25E+8 2.31E+8 - - 1.46E+8 9.98E+7 5.38E+7 Fe-59 Co-57 1.81E+8 4.22E+8 1.79E+7 1.33E+8.

9.98E+8 3.34E+8 1.63E+8 3.OOE+7 I Co-58 4.38E+7 - - 6.04E+8 1.01E+8 Co-60 Ni-63 1.61E+10 2.49E+8 1.13E+9 3.24E+9 1.81E+8 5.60E+8 5.45E+8 I Zn-65 4.24E+8 1.47E+9 - 9.41E+8 - 6.23E+8 6.86E+8 Rb-86 Sr-89 1.51E+10 2.73E+8

- 4.05E+7 1.28E+8 1.80E+9 .4.33E+8 I Sr-90 7.51E+11 - 2.11E+10 1.85E+11 Y-91 Zr-95 7.87E+6 1.74E+6 5.49E+5 8.07E+5 3.23E+9 1.27E+9 2.11E+5 3.78E+5 I Nb-95 1.92E+5 1.06E+5 - 1.03E+5 .- 4.55E+8 5.86E+4 i)

(-5 Ru-103 Ru-106 6.87E+6 3.09E+8 -

2.42E+7 5.97E+8 5.74E+8 2.94E+6 1.48E+10 3.90E+7 I

IZ n- Ag-i lOn 1.52E+7 1.44E+7 2.74E+7 4.04E+9 8.74E+6 z Sb-124 Sb-125 1.55E+8 2.14E+8 2.85E+6 2.34E+6 3.51E+5 2.04E+5 1.35E+8 1.88E+8 3.1IE+9 1.66E+9 6.03E+7 5.OOE+7 I

Te-125m 1.48E+8 5.34E+7 4.14E+7 - , 4.37E+8 1.98E+7 Te-127m Te-129m 5.51E+8 3.67E+8 1.96E+8 1.36E+8 1.31E+8 1.18E+8 2.24E+9 1.54E+9 1.37E+9 1.38E+9 6.56E+7 5.81E+7 I

1-131 7.70E+7 1.08E+8 3.14E+10 1.85E+8 - 2.13E+7 5.79E+7 z"

0 V) 1-132 1I-133 5.18E+1 I1.36E+2 1.97E+6 3.34E+6 4.57E+3 4.66E+8 2.14E+2 5.86E+6 5.91E+1 2.53E+6 4.87E+1 1.02E+6 I

1-134 9.59E-5 2.54E-4 4.24E-3 4.01E-4 3.35E-6 9.13E-5 1-135 3.68E+4 9.48E+4 6.10E+6 1.50E+5 1.05E+5 3.52E+4 W

Cr)

U--

0*_

Cs-134 Cs-136 7.09E+9 4.29E+7 1.67E+10 1.69E+8 5.30E+9 9.19E+7 2.02E+9 1.45E+7 2.08E+8 1.36E+7 7.74E+9 1.13E+8 I w1 0.*

Li) 0 Cs-137 Ba-140 1.OIE+10 1.38E+8 1.35E+10 1.69E+5 4.59E+9 5.75E+4 1.78E+9 1.14E+5 1.92E+8 2.13E+8 4.69E+9 8.91E+6 I U- Ce-141 2.82E+5 1.88E+5 - 8.86E+4 5.38E+8 2.16E+4

D wa

-,J Ce-144 Pr-143 5.27E+7 7.12E+4 2.18E+7 2.84E+4 1.30E+7 1.65E+4 1.33E+10 2.83E+6 2.34E+8 3.55E+3 I

0d Nd-147 3.63E+4 I 3.94E+4 - 2.32E+4 - 1.42E+8 2.36E+3 0o oi w3 t0d Page 116 of 155 I

0*2 w..

(,'3 I

Salem ODCM Rev. 22 Table 2-4 (cont'd)

Pathway Dose Factors - Atmospheric Releases I. R(io), Vegetation Pathway Dose Factors - CHILD (mrem/yr per ptCi/m3) for H'3 and C-14 (m2

mrern/yr per ý+/-Ci/sec) for others H-3 - 4.01E+3 4.01E+3 4.01E+3 4.01E+3 4.01E+3 4.01E+3 C-14 3.50E+6 7.01E+5 7.01E+5 7.01E+5 7.01E+5 7.01E+5 7.01E+5 P-32 3.37E+9 1.58E+8 - - - 9.30E+7 1.30E+8 Cr-5t 6.54E+4 1.79E+4 1.19E+5 6.25E+6 1.18E+5 Mn-54 6.61E+8 - 1.85E+8 - 5.55E+8 I1.76E+8 Fe-55 8.OOE+8 4.24E+8 - - 2.40E+8 7.86E+7 1.31E+8 Fe-59 4.01E+8 6.49E+8 - -1.88E+8 6.76E+8 3.23E+8 Co-57 2.99E+7 - - 2.45E+8 6.04E+7 Co-58 6.47E+7 - - 3.77E+8 1.98E+8 Co-60 - 3.78E+8 - - 2.1OE+9 i.12E+9 Ni-63 3.95E+10 2.11E+9 - - - 1.42E+8 1.34E+9 Zn-65 8.12E+8 2.16E+9 - 1.36E+9 - 3.80E+8 1.35E+9 Rb-86 4.52E+8 - - 2.91E+7 2.78E+8 Sr-89 3.59E+10 - - 1.39E+9 1.03E+9 Sr-90 1.24E+12 - - - 1.67E+10 3.15E+11.

Y-91 1.87E+7 .... 2.49E+9 5.01E+5 Zr-95 3.90E+6 8.58E+5 - 1.23E+6 8.95E+8 7.64E+5 Nb-95 4.10E+5 1.59E+5 - 1.50E+5 - 2.95E+8 1.14E+5 Ru-103 1.55E+7 - - 3.89E+7 - 3.99E+8 5.94E+6 Ru-106 7.45E+8 - - 1.01E+9 - 1.16E+10 9.30E+7 Ag-110m 3.22E+7 2.17E+7 - 4.05E+7 - 2.58E+9 1.74E+7 Sb-124 3.52E+8 4.57E+6 7.78E+5 - 1.96E+8 2.20E+9 1.23E+8 UI0(I)

Sb-125 Te-125m 4.99E+8 3.51E+8 3.85E+6 9.50E+7 4.62E+5 9.84E+7 2.78E+8 1.19E+9 3.38E+8 1.05E+8 4.67E+7 wy Te-127m 1.32E+9 3.56E+8 3.16E+8 3.77E+9 - 1.07E+9 1.57E+8 Te-129m 8.54E+8 2.39E+8 2.75E+8 2.51E+9 - 1.04E+9 1.33E+8 1-131 1.43E+8 1.44E+8 4.76E+10 2.36E+8 - 1.28E+7 8.18E+7 1-132 9.20E+1 1.69E+2 7.84E+3 2.59E+2. - 1.99E+2 7.77E+1 1-133 3.59E+6 4.44E+6 8.25E+8 7.40E+6 - 1.79E+6 1.68E+6 1-134 1.70E-4 3.16E-4 7.28E-3 4.84E-4 - 2.1OE-4 1.46E-4 1-135 6.54E+4 1.18E+5 1.04E+7 1.81E+5 - 8.98E+4 5.57E+4 Cs-134 1.60E+10 2.63E+10 - 8.14E+9 2.92E+9 1.42E+8 5.54E+9 Cs-136 8.06E+7 2.22E+8 - 1.18E+8 1.76E+7 7.79E+6 1.43E+8 Cs-137 2.39E+10 2.29E+10 - 7.46E+9 2.68E+9 1.43E+8 3.38E+9 Ba-140 2.77E+8 2.43E+5 - 7.90E+4 1.45E+5 1.40E+8 1.62E+7 U-Ce-141 6.35E+5 3.26E+5 - 1.43E+5 - 4.07E+8 4.84E+4 Ce-144 1.27E+8 3.98E+7 - 2.21E+7 - 1.04E+10 6.78E+6 Pr-143 1.48E+5 4.46E+4 - 2.41E+4 - 1.60E+8 7.37E+3 0

CL IV) tNd-147 7.16E+4 5.80E+4 3.18E+4 - 9.18E+7 4.49E+3 1+/-I Page 117 of 155

Salem ODCM Rev. 22 Table 2-4 (cont'd)

Pathway Dose Factors - Atmospheric Releases R(io), Ground Plane Pathway Dose Factors (m2

mrem/yr per jtCi/sec) I Nuclide Any Organ H-3 C-14 I

P-32 Cr-51 Mn-54 4.68E+6 1.34E+9 I

Fe-55 Fe-59 Co-58 2.75E+8 3.82E+8 I

Co-60 Ni-63 Zn-65 2.16E+10 7.45E+8 I

Rb-86 8.98E+6 Sr-89 2.16E+4 I

Sr-90 Y-91 Zr-95 1.08E+6 2.48E+8 I Nb-95 1.36E+8 V)

Ru-103 Ru-106 1.09E+8 4.21E+8 I

Ag-il0m 3.47E+9 z

r-y Te-125m Te-127m 1.55E+6 9.17E+4 I

0 Te-129m 2.OOE+7 0 1-131 1.72E+7 I 1-132 1.24E+6 0

.I-133 1-134 1-135 2.47E+6 4.49E+5 2.56E+6 I

z" n

Cs-134 Cs-136 6.75E+9 1.49E+8 I

Cs-137. 1.04E+10 Ba-140 2.05E+7 Ce-141 i.36E+7.

Ce-144 6.95E+7 Pr- 143 0,

0.v Nd-147 8.40E+6 IC i .

W Wr D

Page 118 of 155 n

Salem ODCM

%Rev. 22 APPENDIX A Evaluation of Default Parameters for Liquid Effluents 0

z C-)

0 zy 0

01 0

n U-w.

V)

Page 119 of 155 D~

I Salem ODCM Rev. 2.2 APPENDIX A: Evriuation of Default Parameters for Liquid Effluents A. Effective Maximum Permissible Concentration (MMPC)

In accordance with the requirements of ODCM CONTROL 3.3.3.8 the radioactive liquid effluent I monitors shall be operable with alarm setpoints established to ensure that the concentration of radioactive material at the discharge point does not exceed the MPC value of 10 CFR 20, Appendix B, Table II, Column 2 (Appendix F). The determination of allowable radionuclide concentration and corresponding alarm setpoint is a function of the individual radionuclide distribution and corresponding MPC values.

In order to limit the need for routinely having to reestablish the alarm setpoints as a function of changing radionuclide distributions, a default alarm setpoint can be established. This default setpoint can be based on an evaluation of the radionuclide distribution of the liquid effluents from Salem and the effective MPC value for this distribution.

The effective MNPC value for a radionucide distribution is calculated by the equation:

MPC"= i I

MGC (gamma) where: I z MPC. = an effective MPC value for a mixture of gamma emitting radionuclides (pCi/ml)

QC = concentration of radionuclide i in the mixture

- MPCi = the 10 CFR 20, Appendix B, Table II, Column 2 IMIPC value for radionuclide i (Appendix F) (.tCi/ml)

VThe equation for determining the liquid effiuent setpoints (Section 1.2.1, equation 1.2) is based on a multiplication of the effectiveMPC times the monitor sensitivity. Considering the average effective MPC value for the years 1993, 1994, and 1998, it is reasonable to select an MPCe value 2o of 6.05E-06 pCi/ml for Unit 1 and 4.8 1E-06 ý+/-Ci/ml for Unit 2 as typical of liquid radwaste Z discharges.

LJ zO!

U, P-0 a_I

-.J U-f

Salem. ODCM Rev. 22 B. Correction Factor The type of radiation detector usedito monitor radioactivereleases is not capable of detecting non-gamma emitting radionuclides'such as H-3, Fe-55, and Sr-89, 90, as required by ODCM CONTROL 3.11.1. 1. A conservative default safety factor can be determined to account for non-gamma emitting radionuclides. Non-gamma emitting radionuclides are analyzed at Salem station on a monthly basis from a composite sample of liquid releases.

Nuclide MPC (ýCi/ml) Activity (p.Ci/mIl) Activity / MPC H-3 3E-3 5.2E-1 173.3 Fe-55 8E,4 2.5E&3 3.1 Sr-89 3E-6 2.OE-5 M 6.7 Sr-90 3E-7 7.2E-7 2.4 Total 185.5 The values in the table above reprdsent the maximum reactor coolant values for non-gamma emitting nuclides in 1994 for Unit :1 and 2. Reactor coolant values were chosen to represent the maximum concentration of non-gamnma emitting nuclides that could b6 released from Salem

'if Station. The activity values in the table will be diluted by a minimum factor of 800 prior to release. The minimum dilution factor is obtained by using the minimur4 circulating water flowrate of 100,000 gpm and the maximum release rate of 120 gpm.

V) A conservative non-gamma factorfor non-gamma emitting nuclides can be obtained using the highest Activity/MPC fraction and the minimum dilution factor as follows:

Non-Gamma Factor - 185.5/800 = 0.23 (Rounded up'to 0.25)

Correction Factor = 1-Q.25 I

= 0.75 0

C. Default setpoint determination:

Using the information and parameters described above a default setpoiat can be calculated for Unit 1 and 2 liquid radwaste disposal process radiation monitors (RI 8).

U)

Using these values to calculate the default R1 8 alarm setpoint value, results in a setpoint that:

IM U--

1) Will not require frequent re-adjustment due to minor variations in the nuclide distribution which are typical of routine plant bperations, and

2) Will provide for a liquid radwaste discharge rate (as evaluated for e'ach batch release) that is 7,,

Uv- compatible with plant operations (refer to Tables 1-11 and 1-1.2)..

0 cn V)

Page 121 of 155 W

I Salemn ODCM Rev. 22 I Table A-I: Calculation of Effective IvIPC - Unit. I I

Activity Released (Ci)

Nuclide BE-7 MPC*

(" f/*-r.D 2.OOE,03 1993 CURIES 8.88E-04 31 994 CURIES ND 1998 CURIES ND I

NA-24 CR-51 MN-54 3.OOE-05 2.OOE-03 1.OOE-04 6.68E-04 5.38E-03 3.52E-02 1.62E-04 2.02E-03 1.37E-02 1.OOE-04 ND.

7.16E-04 I

MN-56 I.OOE-04 ND ND 0.OOE+00 FE-59 CO-57 5.OOE-05 4.OOE-04.

4.76E-04 1.03E-02 1.71E+00 4.84E-03 3.1OE-03 6.47E-01 ND 1.78E-05 3.39E-02 I

CO-58 9.OOE-05 CO-60 ZR-95 NB-95 3.OOE-05 6.OOE-05 1.OOE-04 3.04E-01 3.29E-03 5.78E-03.

1.1OE-0I 7.13E-04 1.28E-03 2.42E-02 ND ND U

1.07E-03 4.90E-05 I

NB-97 9.OOE-04 1.27E-03 TC-99M 3.OOE-03 2.66E-04 ND ND SR-89 3.OOE-06 ND ND 2.18E-04 SR-92 6.OOE-05 ND 7.32E-06 ND MO-99 AG-1 10m SN-1 13 4.OOE-05 3:06E-05 8.O0E-05 1.76E-04 1.19E-02 7.88E-05 1.76E-04 1.1OE-02

4.91E-05 ND 6.58E705' ND I

SB-122 SB-124 SB-125

,3.OOE-05 2.OOE-05

1.OOE-04 .

1.21E-03 2.08E-02.

9.04E-02 5.35E-04 1.75E-02 8.23E-02

. 1.12E-03 1.73E-02

-3.56E-02 I

iJ SB-126 3.OOE-06 ND 6.18E-05 2.23E-04 z

U 1-131 1-133 3.OOE-07 1.0OE-06 1.27E-01 2.16E-03 1.82E-02 1.88E-04 2.32E-03 8.32E-06 I

1-134 2.OOE-05 ND 3.63E-04 ND z

0 CE-141 CE-143 CS-134 9.OOE-05 4.OOE-05 9.OOE-06 ND 5.42E-05 3.54E-01 4.24E-05 ND 6.46E-01 ND ND 2.49E-02 I

. ND 0

CS-136 CS-137 CS-138 6.OOE-05 2.OOE-05 3.OOE-06

.3.61E-03 4.53E-01 4.15E-06 1.59E-03 8.541E-O1 1.35E-04 7.51E-02 ND I

BA-140 2.OOE-05 ND 8.62E-05 ND Li1 LA-140 RU-105 2.OOE-05 I.OOE-04 2.12E-04 2.21E-04 1.86E-04 1.35E-04 ND ND ND I

zLI RU-106 1.OOE-05 ND 1.03E-03 0

C-(i ZN-65 Total Ci 1.OOE-04 Ganmna 6.72E-04 3.14E+00 ND 2.42E+00 ND 2.16E-01 I

MPCe (gCi/ml) 6.OSE-06 1.28E-05 1.28E-05 I

NV[C value for unrestricted area from 10 CPR 20, Appendix B, Table II, Column 2.

0 CL

- ND - not detected I

I 0

Page 122 of 155 Lij L/I 0.

I

Salem ODCM Rev. 22 Table A-2: Calculation of Effective MPC - Unit2 Activity Released (Ci)

Nuclide MPC* 1993 1994 1998

"(#Ci/m1) CURtES CURIES CURIES BE-7 2.OOE-03 1.59E-03 2.88E-04 ND NA-24 3.OOE-05 1.05E-03 5.77E-05 7.39E-05 CR-51 2.OOE-03 4.39E-03 1.55E-03 1.14E-04 NIN-54 1.OOE-04 3.73E-02 1.37E-02 7.54E-04 MN-56 1.OOE-04 ND ND 4.66E-05 FE-59 5.OOE-05 4.83E-04 3.25E-03 ND CO-57 4.OOE-04 1.17E-02 3.24E-03 ND CO-58 9.OOE-05 1.75E+00 6ý60E-01 4.52E-02 CO-60 3.OOE-05 3.47E-01 1.03E-01 2.12E-02 ZR-95 6.OOE-05 2.34E-03 3.22E-04 ND NB-95 1.OOE-04 3.97E-03 1.11E-03 ND NB-97 9.OOE-04 1.46E-03 1.10E-03 4.22E-05 TC-99M 3.OOE-03 3.77E-04 ND 2.35E-06 SR-89 3.OOE-06 ND ND 2.71E-04 SR-92 6.OOE-05 ND IA3E-05 ND MO-99 4.OOE-05 ND ND ND AG-i10mt 3.OOE-05 1.03E-02 1.34E-02 ND SN-1 13 8.OOE-05 7.45E-05 ND ND SB-122 3.OOE-05 1.20E-03 ND 6.37E-04 SB-124 2.OOE-05 3.77E-02 9.82E-03 1,44E-02 SB-125 1.OOE-04 1.35E-01 603E-02 1.88E-02 SB-126 3.OOE-06 3.51E-04 ND 1.97E-04 1-131 3.OOE-07 1.87E-01 7.98E-03 3.14E-03 v 1-132- 8.OOE-06 8.72E-05 ND 1.68E-04 1-134 2.OOE-05 2.39E-04 1.85E-04 ND CE-141 9.OOE-05 ND 2.87E-05 ND C)

CE-143 ND ND N'D 4.OOE-05 CS-134 9.OOE-06 4.57E-01 6.44E-01 2.64E-02 CS-136 6.OOE-05 4.82E-03 1.51E-03 ND CS-137 2.00B-05 5.70E-01 8.54E-01 7.97E-02 CS-138 3.OOE-06 ND ND 4.90E-05 BA-140 2.OOE-05 ND ND ND LA-140 2.OOE-05 2.03E-03 1.11E-04 ND RU-105 1.OOE-04 4.07E-05 ND ND RU-106 1.OOE-05 ND 4.38E-04 ND U-7_ ZN-65 L.OOE-04 1.59E-04 .ND ND W-187 6.OOE-05 ND 7.98E-05 ND 0

lwJ 0 Total Ci Gamma 3.57E+00 2.38E+00 2.31E-01

--J; MiPCe (O'Ci/ml) 4.81E-06 1.55E-05 1.12E-05 lnM

MPC value for unrestricted area from 10 CFR 20,Appendix B, Table HI,Column 2.

10 6'3

- ND = not detected r.. Page 123 of 155 cv-w/

Salem ODCM Rev. 22 I

APPENDIX B Technical Basis for Simplified Dose Calculations Liquid Radioactive Effluent I

I I

z V) 0 I Zý F--

(/Y z"

0 03 w

I 0!

z I

w. I z*.

CY 0

Q:.

w w_ Page 124 of 155 0'w

Salem ODCM Rev. 22' APPENDIX B: Technical Basis for Simplified Dose Calculations - Liquid Effuents The radioactive liquid effluents for the years 1993, 1994, and 1998 were evaluated to determine the dose contribution of the radionuclide distribution. These were the most recent years of full power operation for both Units. This analysis was performed to evaluate the use of a limited dose analysis for determining environmental doses, providing a simplified method of determining compliance with the dose limits of ODCM CONTROL 3.11.1.2.

For the radionuclide distribution of effluents from Salem, the controlling organ is typically the GI-LLI.

The calculated GI-LLI dose is predominately a function of the Fe-55, Co-58, Co-60, Fe-59 and Ag-1 10m releases. The radionuclides, Cs-134 and Cs-137 contribute the large majority of the

calculated total body dose. The results of the evaluation for 1993, 1994, and 1998 are presented in Table B-1 and Table B-2.

For purposes of simplifying the details of the dose calculational process, it is conservative to identify a conitrolling, dose significant radionucide and limit the calculation process to the use of the dose conversion factor for this nuclide. Multiplication of the total release (i.e., cumulative activity for all radionuclides) by this dose conversion factor provides for a dose calculation method that is simplified while also being conservative.

For the evaluation of the maximum organ dose, it is conservative to use the Nb-95 dose conversion factor (1.51 E+06 mrern/hr per pCi/ml, GI-LLI). By this approach, the maximum organ dose will be overestimated since this nuclide has the highest organ dose factor of all the radionuclides evaluated.

IFor the total body calculation, the Fe-59 dose factor (2.32 E+05 mrem/hr per gCi/mIl, total body) is the highest among the identified dominant nucides. For evaluating compliance with the dose limits of 0 ODCM CONTROL 3.11.1.2, the following simplified equations may be used:

1<1 (A3.

Total Body V)CW D 1.6E-02*VOL *AFe- 59,TB*zCi (B-1) zi

!Where:

0 Dtb = dose to the total body (ntrern)

-AF-sgTB = 7.27E+04, total body ingestion dose conversion factor for Fe-59 (mrem/hr per piCi/ml) ay VOL = volume of liquid effluent released (gal) total concentration of all radionuclides (gCi/ml)

CW average circulating water discharge rate during release period(gal/min) 0 1.67E-02 = conversion factor (hr/min)

Inz 0.

Ui Page 125 of 155 ary

I I

Salem ODCM Rev. 22 Substituting the value for the Fe-59 total body dose conversion factor, the equation suimlifieS to:

I Dtb:=.21E+03 VOL (B,2)

I CW*

I

-Dnx-1.67E-02*170L Dmax Av95G-iz

m.9,IL*Ci i

0B33) I Where: I DMx = maximum organ dose (mrem)

ANb-95,GI-LLI =1.5 1 E+06, P.Ci/m1)

Gi-LLI ingestion dose conversion factor for Nb-95 (mrem/hr per I

Substituting the value for AN1-95,G1-Wu the equation simplifies to:

I 2.52E+04*VOL DMW= " *ECc cw (B.4)

I Tritium is not included in the.limited analysis dose assessment for liquid releases, because the potential dose resulting from normal reactor releases is relatively negligible. The average annual tritium release from each Salem Unit is approximately 350 curies. The calculated total body dose from such a release I

is 2.4E-03 mrem/yr via the fish and invertebrate ingestion pathways. This amounts to 0.08% of the design limit dose of 3 toren/yr. Furthermore, the release of tritium is a function of operating time and power level and is essentially unrelated to radwaste system operation.

I (I) I I

z U*

I

(-D I

0 0ý I

U-Page 126 of 155 I

I

M MI m m m m IM m m IMmmm USER RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING REVISION, STATUS AND CHANGES Salem ODCM Rev. 22 Table B-1: Adult Dose Contributions - Fish and Invertebrate Pathways - Unit I Nuclide Release (Ci) T.Body Dose Fraction GI-LLI Dose Fraction Liver Dose Fraction 1994 1993 1998 1994 1993 1998 1994 1993 1998 1994 1993 1998 Mn-54 1.32E-2 3.51E-2 7.16E-4 *

0.03 0.02 *

0.02

Fe-55 1.49E-1 6.40E-2 8.39E-2 0.07 0.04 0.37 0.12 0.03 0.52 0.19 0.14 0.67 Fe-59 4.84E-3 4.77E-4 N/D 0.02 *

0.12 0.01

0.03 0.01 Co-58 6.47E-1 1.71E+0 3.39E-2 0.05 0.18 0.02 0.31 0.51 0.13 0.01 0.07 Co-60 1.10E-1 3.04E-1 2.42E-2 0.02 0.09 0.05 0.14 0.24 0.24

0.03 0.01 Zn-65 NID 6.72E-4 NID

0.01

0.01 *

0.02

Nb-95 1.28E-3 5.78E-3 N/D * * *

0.01- * *

Ag-ll0m 1.1OE-2 1.19E-2 6.58E-5 * *

0.26 0.17 0.01 * *

Sb-124 1.75E-2 2.58E-2 1.73E-2 * * * *

0.04 * , .

Sb-125 8.23E-2 9.04E-2 3.56E-2 * * * *

0.02 * *

Cs-134 6.461-1 3.54E-1 2.49E-2 0.47 0.38 0.18 * *

0.38 0.37 0.09 Cs-137 8.54E-1 4.53E-1 7.51E-2 0.37 0.28 0.32 * *

0.37 0.35 0.20 Total 2.53E+0 3.21E+0 3.31E-1

Less than 0.01 N/D = not detected Page 127 of 155

USER RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING REVISION, STATUS AND CHANGES Salem ODCM Rev. 22 Table B-2: Adult Dose Contributions - Fish and Invertebrate Pathways - Unit 2 Nuclide Release (Ci) T.Body Dose Fraction GI-LLI Dose Fraction Liver Dose Fraction 1994 1993 1998 1994 1993 1998 1994 1993 1998 1994 1993 1998 Mn-54 1.37E-2 3.73E-2 7.54E-4 * *

0.01 0.02 *

0.01

Fe-55 1.38E-1 6.6113-2 1.64E-2 0.06 0.04 0.10 0.10 0.03 0.18 0.18 0.12 0.27 Fe-59 3.25E-3 4.8213-4 N/D 0.01 *

0.08 0.01

0.02 *

Co-58 6.60E-1 1.75F3+0 4.52E-2 0.05 0.16 0.04 0.29 0.51 0.29 0.01 0.06 0.01 Co-60 1.03E-1 3.47B-1 2.12E-2 0.02 0.09 0.06 0.12 0.27 0.37 0.01 0.03 0.02 Zn-65 NID 1.59F--4 N/D * * * * * * * *

Nb-95 1.11B-3 3.97,E-3 N/D * *

0.06 0.01 * * *

Ag-110m 1.34E-2 1.03E-2 N/D * *

0.31 0.14 * * *

Sb-124 9.82E-3 3.7713-2 1.44E-2 * *

0.01 0.06 * *

Sb-125 6.03E-2 .1.3513-1 1.88E-2 * * *

0.01 0.02 * *

Cs-134 6.44E-1 4.58B3-1 2.64E-2 0.48 0.41 0.26 0.01 *

0.39 0.40 0.20 Cs-137 8.54E-1 5.7013-1 7.97E-2 0.37 0.30 0.46 * *

0.38 0.36 0.45 Total 2.48E+0 3.651E+0 2.23E-1.

Less than 0.01 N/D = not detected Page 128 of 155 m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m

Salanm ODCM Rev. 22 APPENDIX C I Technical Bases for Effective Dose Factors Gaseous Radioactive Effluent I

I.

t.I (3

I.

En 0

(/Y w

Page 129 of 155

I Saiemn ODCM Rev. 22 AFPENDIX C: Technical Bases for Effective Dose Factors - Gaseous Effluents .

I Overiew I The evaluation of doses due to releases of radioactive material to the atmosphere can be simplified by the use of effective dose transfer factors instead of using dose factors which are radionuclide. specific. I These effective factors, which can be based on typical radionuclide distributions of releases, can be applied to the total radioactivity released to approximate the dose in the environment (i.e., instead of having to perform individual radionuclide dose analyses only a single multiplication (Keff, Meff or Neff)

I times the total quantity of radioactive material released would be needed).

This approach provides a reasonable estimate of the actual dose while eliminating the need for a I

detailed calculational technique.

Determination of Effective Dose Factors I

Effectivedose transfer factors are calculated by the following equations:

I Keff =Z4A (C.1) 1 V) tad Where:

Keff - the effective total body dose factor due to gamma emissions from all noble gases I

0 w

U C) released Ki= the total body dose factor due to gamma emissions from each noble gas radionuclide i released I

z 0

fi = the fractional abundance of noble gas radionuclide i relative to the total noble gas activity I ry Ar~iM (C.2)

I U- Where: I (L+ 1.1 M)eff = the effective skin dose factor due to beta and gamma emissions from all noble gases released I 0 (Li + 1.1 Mi) = the skin dose factor due to beta and gamma emissions from each noble gas I

¢-J 7

radionuclide i released 0

n U-0*..

iUi 0

I D

Page 130 of 155.

I I

Salem ODCMA Rev. 22 Where:

Meff = the effective air dose factor due to gamma emissions from all noble gases released Mi = the air dose factor due to gamma emissions from each noble gas radionuclide i released Neff -(C.4)

I i.

Where:

Neff = the effective air dose factor due to beta emissions from all noble gases released Ni = the air dose factor due to beta emissions from each noble gas radionuclide i released Normally, it would be expected that past radioactive effluent data would be used for the determination of the effective dose factors. However, the noble gas releasesfrom Salem have been maintained to such negligible quantities that the inherent variability in the data makes any meaningful evaluations difficult.

I . _ Therefore, in order to provide a reasonable basis for the derivation of the effective noble gas dose factors, the primary coolant source term from ANSI N237-1976/ANS-18.1, "Source Term Specifications," has been used as representing a typical distribution. The effective'dose factbrs as derived are presented in Table C- 1.

C-) Application To provide an additional degree of conservatism, a factor of 0.50 is introduced into the dose calculational process when the effective dose transfer factor is used. This conservatism provides i* additional assurance that the evaluation of doses by the use of a single effective factor will not significantly underestimate any actual doses in the environment.

ab z For evaluating compliance with the dose limits of ODCM CONTROL 3.11.2.2, the following 0 simplified equations may be used:

Dr=3.17E'*-08(C.5, 0.50 YQ*M Zi

> and I ~Dl3"T-O* 31E-08~ Q*Nf *I:Qi (C.6) 0.50 i SP 3Where:

Page 131 of 1551

I Salem ODOMN Re-V 22 I

D,= air dose due to gamma elnissions for the cumulative release of all noble gases Dp=

(mrad) air dose due to beta emissions for the cumulative release of all noble gases (r-ad)

I X/Q = atmospheric dispersion to the controlling site boundary (sec/m3)

Meff =

Neff =

5.3 E+02, effective gamma-air dose factor (mrad/yr per ýtCi/m3) 1.1E+03, effective beta-air dose factor (mrad/yr per pCi/m3)

I

.Q = cumulative release for all noble gas radionuclides (ptCi) 3.17E-08 =

0.50 =

conversion factor (yr/sec) conservatism factor to account for the vai ability in the effluent data I

Combining the constants, the dose calculational equations simplify to: I DP =3.5E- 05"*%yi (C.7)

I and I

Do=7.OE-05*% Q*ZQi Q

(C.8)

I The effective dose factors are used on a very limited basis for the purpose of facilitating the timely assessment of radioactive effluent releases, particularly' during periods of computer malfunction where a detailed dose assessment may beunavailable. pea.ow r I

Cn-z U

V-)

I C,-)

I U

0*

00 z

I I

LL_

U--

0 U--

I I

-1 I

CL- I Page 132 of 155.

I Vi)

D

Salem ODCM Rev. 22 Table C-1: 'Effective Dose'Factors i . Noble Gases - Total Body and Skin Total Body Effective Skin Effective Dose Factor Dose Factor Keff (L+ 1.1 M)eff Radionuclide fi0 (mrem/yr per ,UCi/m 3) (mrem/yr per jCi/m3)

Kr-85 0.01 1.4E+01 Kr-88 0.01 1.5E+02 1.9E+02 Xe-133m 0.01 2.5E+00 1.4E+01 Xe-133 0.95 2.8E+02 6.6E+02 Xe-135 0.02 3.6E+01 7.9E+01 Total 4.7E-02 9.6E+02 Noble Gases - Air Gamma Air Effective Beta Air Effective Dose Factor Dose Factor I. Miff Neff Radionuclide (mrad/yr per ptCi/m 3) (mrad/yr per pCi/rn 3) 0 w Kr-85 0.01 2.OE+01 V) Kr-88 0.01 1.5E+02 2.9E+01 Xe-133m 0.01 3.3E+00 1.5E+01 Xe-133 0.95 3.4E+02 1.OE+03 V) Xe-135 0.02 3.8E+01 4.9E+01 0 Total 5.3E+02 1.1E+03 Ii >

I!

Based on Noble gas distribution from ANSI N237-1976/ANSI-18.1, "Source Term Specifications."

0 r11 0

1, LL 0v Page 133 of 155

&alem ODCM Rev. 22 S

APPENDIX D Technical Basis for Simplified Dose Calculation Gaseous Radioactive Effluent V-)

z 00 D

z*

0 0

(.-

0, LU n0 U,

Q-1 0

0_

0*

LUt 0*f Page 134 of 155 t0t

Salem ODOM Rev. T2

APPENDrX D: Technical Basis for Simplified Dose Caiculation - Gaseous Effluents The pathway dose factors for the controlling infant age -roup were evaluated to determine the controlling pathway, organ and radionuclide. This analysis was performed to provide a simplified method for determining compliance with ODCM CONTROL 3.11.2.3 For the infant age group, the controlling pathway is the grass-cow-milk (g/c/m) pathway: An infant

receives a greater radiation dose from the glc/m pathway than any other pathway. Of this g/c/m Ipathway, the maximum exposed organ including the total body, is the thyroid, and the highest dose contributor is radionuclide 1-131. The results for this evaluation are presented in Table D-1.

I For purposes of simplifying the details of the dose calculation process, it is conservative to identify a controlling, dose significant organ and radionuclide and limit the calculation process to the use of the dose conversion factor for the organ and radionuclide. Multiplication of the total release (i.e.

cumulative activity for all radionuclides) by this dose conversion factor provides for a dose calculation method that is simplified while also being conservative.

For the evaluation of the dose commitment via a controlling pathway and age group, it is conservative to use the infant, g/c/m, thyroid, 1-131 pathway dose factor (1.05E12 m2 mrem/yr per ýtCi/sec). By this approach, the maximum dose commitment will be overestimated since 1-131 has the highest pathway dose factor of all radionuclides evaluated.

I

For evaluating compliance with the dose limits of ODCM CONTROL 3.11.2.3, the following simplified equation may be used:

D.m.x=3.17E-08*W

Ri-131

ZQ, LW o

U Where:

D.x = maximum organ dose (mrem)

W = atmospheric dispersion parameters to the controlling location(s) as identified in V) Table 3.2-4.

X/Q = atmospheric dispersion for inhalation pathway and H-3 dose contribution via other

< pathways (sec/n 3)

D/Q = atmospheric deposition for vegetation, milk and ground plane exposure pathways (m"2) 0 Qi =cumulative release over'the period of interest for radioiodines and particulates Cn 3.17E-8 = conversion factor (yr/sec)

RI-131 = 1-131 dose parameter for the thyroid for the identified controlling pathway

= 1.05E+12 (mi2 mrem/yr per [LCi/sec), infant thyroid dose parameter with the grass-cow-milk pathway controlling

The ground plane exposure and inhalation pathways need not be considered when the above simplified

~> calculation method is used because of the overall negligible contribution of these pathways to the total o thyroid dose.

o It is recognized that for some particulate radionuclides (e.g., Co-60 and Cs-137), the ground exposure 0_ pathway may represent a higher dose contribution than either the vegetation or milk pathway.

WPage 135 of155.

I Salem ODM.N1 Rev. 22 However, use of the 1-131 thyroid doseizam-eter for all radionuclides will maximize the orgarn dose.

I calculation, especially considering that no other radionuclide has a-higher dose parameter for. aniy organ via any pathway than 1-13 1 for the thyroid via the milk pathway (see Table D-1). I The dose should be evaluated based on the predetermined controlling pathways as identified in Table 2-3. If more limiting pathways in the surrounding environment of Salem are. identified by the annual land use census, Table 2-3 will be revised as specified in ODCM CONTROL 3.12.2.

I I

I 7i I

I I

I co-I W

ci-I Di I

I Page 136 of 155 I

Salem ODCM Rev. 22 Table D-1: infant Dose Contributions Fraction of Total Organ and Body Dose PATHWAYS Target Organs Grass-Cow-Milk Ground Plane Total Body 0.02 0.15 Liver 0.23 0.14 Thyroid 0.59 0.15 Kidney 0.02 0.15 Lung 0.01 0.02 GI-LLI 0.02 0.15 W

V.)

CD Fraction of Dose Contribution by Pathway Pathway f Grass-Cow-Milk 0.92 zZ 0 Ground Plane 0.08 o Inhalation N/A

)-

0 r,

0 0

w 0)

V-0/

D 0~c r0 Page 137 of 155

I Saiem ODCM Rev. 22 I

I I

APPENDIX E I

Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program I Sample Type, Location and Analysis I

I I

I

-7 r

I z

0 0

Cn z"

I 0

0 I

M I

zk--

I 0

n Q-1 La_

I LI.

I U-03 U-v Page 138 of 155 I

iU-

Saier_ ODCM Rev. 22 APPENDIX E:.Radioiogica! Environmental Monitoring Pr~gram .*. . .

i1 SAMPLE DESIGNATION Samples are identified by a three part code. The first two letters are the power station identification code, in this case "SA". The next three letters are for the media sampled.

AIO = Air Iodine IDM = Immersion Dose (DLR)

APT = Air Particulates MLK = Milk ECH = Hard Shell Blue Crab PWR = Potable Water (Raw)

ESF = Edible Fish PWT = Potable Water (Treated)

ESS = SedimentSWA = Surface Water WWA = Well Water The last four symbols are a location code based on direction and distance from the site. Of these, the first two represent each of the sixteen angular sectors of 22.5 degrees centered about the reactor site.

Sector one is divided evenly by the north axis and othersectors are numbered in a clockwise:direction; i.e., 2=NNE, 3=NE, 4=ENG, etc. The next digit is a letter which represents the radial distance from the plant:

S = On-site location E = 4-5 miles off-site 1.i)

A = 0-1 miles off-site B 1-2 miles off-site F = 5-10 miles off-site G = 10-20 miles off-site C 2-3 miles off-site H = > 20 miles off-site D 3-4 miles off-site The last number is the station numerical designation within each sector and zone; e.g., 1,2,3. For example; the designation SA-WWA-5D1 would indicate a sample in the SGS and HCGS program V) (SA), consisting of we'll water (WWA), which had been collected in sector number 5, centered at 90'

(/A (due east) with respect to the reactor site at a radial distance of 3 to 4 miles off-site, (therefore, radial distance D). The number 1 indicated that this is sampling station #1 in that particular sector.

SAMPLING LOCATIONS All .sampling locations and specific information about the individual locations are given in Table E-1.

Maps E-1 and E-2 show the locations of sampling stations with respect to the site.

0 U-I.

r11 lLe 0

t,

_° W

cL Page 139 of 155

Salem ODCI Rev. 22 TABLE E-1: REMP Sample Locations 3

A. Direct Radiation Monitoring Locations (iDM)

STATION CODE STATION LOCATION I 1S1 0.55 mi. N of vent 2S2 0.4 mi. NNE of vent 2S4 0.59 mi. NNE of vent 3S1 0.58 mi. NE of vent 4S1 5S1 0.60 mi ENE of vent 1.0 mi. E of vent; site access road 0.21 mi. ESE of vent; observation building 3

6S2 7S 1 0.12 mi. SE of vent; station personnel gate los1 0.14 mi. SSW of vent; circ water bldg.

11Si 0.09 mi. SW of vent; service water bldg.

15S1 0.57 mi. NW of vent 16S1 0.54 mi. NNW of vent 4D2 3.7 mA.ENE of vent; Alloway Creek Neck Road 5D1 3.5 mi. E of vent; local farm 1OD1 3.9 mi, SSW of vent; Taylor's Bridge Spur 14D1 3.4 mi. WNW of vent; Bay View, DE 15D1 3.8 mi. NW of vent; Rt 9, Augustine Beach, DE 2E1 4.4 mi. NNE of vent; local farm O 3El 4.1 mi. NE of vent; local farm I

11 E2 5.0 mi. SW of vent'

" 12E1 4.4 mi. WSW of vent; Thomas Landing Z 13E1 4.2 mi. W of vent; Diehl House Lab 16E1 4.1 mi. NNW of vent; Port Penn

(..)

17F1 5.8 mi. N of vent; Fort Elfsborg n 2F2 8.7 mi. NNE of vent; Salem Substation.

2F5 7.4 mi. NNE of vent; Salem High School

< 2F6 7.3 mi. NNE of vent; PSE&G Training Center Salem NJ V 3F2 5.1 mi. NE of vent; Hancocks Bridge, NJ Munc Bldg 2"

0 3F3 8.6 mi. NE of vent; Quinton Township Elem. School NJ

_ 4F2 6.0 mi. ENE of vent; Mays Lane, Harmersville, NJ

> 5F1 6.5 mi. E of vent; Canton, NJ ILI

° I

>I--

me 0

Page l4O'of 155 VI)

D I

Salem ODCM Rev. 22 TABLE E-l (Cont'd)

I .O A. Direct Radiation Monitoring Locations (1DM) (Cont'd)

STATION CODE STATION LOCATION 6F1 6.4 mi. ESE of vent; Stow Neck Road 7F2 9.1 mi. SE of vent; Bayside, NJ 9F1 5.3 mi. S of vent off Route #9, DE I0F2 5.8 mi. SSW of vent; Rt. 9 1 MF 6.2 mi. SW of vent; Taylors Bridge, DE 12F 1 9.4 mi. WSW of vent; Townsend Elementary School, DE 13F2 6.5 mi. W of vent; Odessa, DE 13F3 9.3 mi. W of vent; Redding Middle School 13F4 9.8 mi. W of vent; Middletown, DE 14F2 6.6 mi. WNW of vent; Boyds Comer 15F3 5.4 mi. NW of vent 16F2 8.1 mi. NNW of vent; Delaware City Public School 1G3 19 mi. N of vent; N. Church St. Wilmington, DE 3G1 17 mi. NE of vent; local farm IOGI 12 mi. SSW of vent; Smyrna, DE I . 14G1

.16G1 11.8 mi. WNW of Vent; Rte 286, Bethel Church Rd., DE 15 mi. NNW of vent; Wilmington Airport.

3H1 32 mi. NE of vent; National Park, NJ 03 n-)

B. Air Sampling Locations (AIO,APT)

V) STATION CODE STATION LOCATION 5S1 1.0 mi. E of vent; site access road 5D1 3.5 mi. E of vent; local farm I0 16E1 1F1 4.1 mi. NNW of vent; Port Penn 5.8 mi. N of vent; Fort Elfsborg

> 2F6 7.3 mi. NNE of vent; PSE&G Training Center Salem, NJ 14G1 11.8 mi. WNW of Vent; Rte 286, Bethel Church Rd., DE U-i, Uv-0 cv-Page 141 of 155

I Salem ODCM Rev. 2 Table E-I (Cont'd)

C. Surface Water Locations (SWA) - Delaware River STATION CODE STATION LOCATION 11Al 0.2 mi. SW of vent; Salem Outfall Area 12C1 2.5 mi. WSW of vent; West bank of Delaware River 7E1 4.5 mi. SE of vent; Delaware River 1.0 mi. W of Mad Horse Creek 16F 1 6.9 mi. NNW of vent; C&D Canal D. Ground Water Locations (WWA) 3 STATION CODE STATION LOCATION 3E1 4.1 mi NE of vent, local farm No groundwater samples are required as liquid effluents discharged from Hope Creek and Salem Generating Stations do not directly affect this pathway. However, this location (3El) is being monitored as a management audit sample E. Drinking Water Locations (PWR, PWT)

STATION CODE STATION LOCATION 2F3 8.0 mi NNE of vent, Salem Water Works Uj CD No public drinking water samples or irrigation water samples are required as these pathways Z are not directly affected by liquid effluents discharged from Hope Creek and Salem Generating Stations. However, this location (2F3) is being monitored as a management audit sample

< F. Water Sediment Locations (ESS)

STATION CODE STATION LOCATION 11A 0.2 mi. SW of vent; Salem outfall area o15A 0.3 mi. NW of vent; Hope Creek outfall area

_ 16A1 0.7 mi. NNW of vent; South Storm Drain outfall

> 12C1 2.5 mi. WSW of vent; West bank of Delaware River 7E1 4.5 mi. SE of vent; I mi West of Mad Horse Creek z 16F1 6.9 mi. NNW of vent; C&D Canal 6S2 0.2 mi. ESE of vent; observation building

> G. Milk Sampling Locations (MLK) 3 STATION CODE STATION LOCATION cO 2G3 12.0 mi. NNE of vent, local farm 3E3 4.9 mi W of vent, local farm a-W 14F4 3G1 0I 7.6 mi. WNW of vent; local farm 17 mi. NE of vent; local farm Page 142 of 155

Saiem ODCM Rev. 2-2 Table E-I (Cant~d)

I° H. Fish and Invertebrate Locations (ESF, ECH)

STATION CODE STATION LOCATION 11Al 0.2 mi. SW of vent; Salem outfall area 12C1 2.5 mi. WSW of vent; West bank of Delaware River 7E1 4.5 mi. SE of vent; I mi West of Mad Horse Creek

1. Food Product Locations STATION CODE STATION LOCATION The Delaware River at the location of Salem and Hope Creek Nuclear Power Plants is a brackish water source. No irrigation of food products is performed using water in the vicinity from which liquid plant wastes have been discharged. However, 12 management audit food samples are collected from various locations. Contact ODCM coordinator for sampling locations.

I*

C-)

'5 0

0~a eLý 13 0._

a/-

tJ ct2 Page 143 of 155*

I Sai!m ODCM Rev. 22 I

SAMPLES COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS I

Samp1e Collection Method Analvsis Air Particulate Continuous low volume Gross Beta analysis I air sampler. Sample on each weekly collected every week along with the filter sample. Gamma spectrometry shall I change. be performed if gross beta exceeds 10 times the yearly I mean of the control station value. Samples shall be analyzed 24 hrs ormore after I

collection to allow for radon and thorium I daughter decay. Gamma isotopic analysis on quarterly composites.

I

Air Iodine A TEDA impregnated charcoal cartridge is Iodine 131 analysis are performed on I

UI 0

connected to air particulate air sampler and is collected weekly each weekly sample.

I F-9 at filter change.

Two batch samples are Gamma isotopic I

LICrab and Fish sealed in a plastic analysis of edible I

Z bag or jar and frozen portion on collection.

0 z semi-annually or when 1-L:I in season.

A sediment sample is Gamma isotopic I

taken semi-annually.

U--

0 analysis semi-annually. I 2 DLR's will be Gamma dose quarterly.

w WO 0-collected from each location quarterly.

I

> Sdien I

LIJ Q:

I Page 144 of 155 LI I

Salem OD., Rev. 22 SAMPLE COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS (Cont'd)

I. Sample Collection Method Analvsis Milk Sample of fresh milk Gamma isotopic is collected for each analysis and 1-131 farm semi-monthly when analysis on each cows are in pasture, sample on collection.

monthly at other times.

Water Sample to be collected Gamma isotopic (Potable, monthly providing winter monthly H-3 on Surface) icing conditions allow. quarterly surface sample, monthly on ground water sample.

I*

0 U-

>i wY Page 145 of 155

I Salem ODCM RKy. 22 I

FIGURE E-1: ONSITE SAMPLING LOCATIONS a I MAP B-1 LOCATIONS ON-SITE SAMPLING I

I 1

I I

I 13 5 I H-9 0

I z

I 0

z 0

0V)

I LJ U-0 w

n I

-.J 0

H-9 I a-U-Y V-I 0s D

Page 146 of 155.

I I

Saiem ODCM Rev;. 22ý FIGuRE E-2: OFFSITE SAxvM-PLING LOCATIONS.

I*

16NWAE~ 16: NN TO INNN .. 3-

~'r~' ~

. 40 1

N CATL NI wN.m I. HUNDRED 9 8 Vj)

I-C-7 F_

(I) 0 U-mry I

i0 U-uLi Page 147 of 155

Sal.--m- ODOM Rev'. 22f APPENDIX F MAXIMUM PERMISSIBLE CONCENTRATIONS LIQUID EFFLUENTS I

0 U

0 a1 Li 00 0

w u-z 0.

U-uj w

0*

0..

0y w Page 148 of 155 D*

V)

Salem ODCM Rev. 22 APPENDUK F: Maximum Permirsiibe Concentration (MPC) Values - Liquid. Efflueuts.- ,

The following radionuclide concentrations were obtained from 1C-CFR 20 Appendix B, Table II, I* Column 2 as revised January 1, 1991.

Table F-1: Maximum Permissible Concentrations Element Isotope Soluble Conc Insoluble Conc.

_(.Ci/ml) (tCi/ml Actinium (89) Ac-227 2E-6 3E-4 Ac-228 9E-5 9E-5 Americium (95) Am-241 4E-6 3E-5 Am-242m 4E-6 9E-5 Am-242 1E-4 I E-4 Am-243 4E-6 3E-5 Am-244 5E-3 5E-3 Antimony. (51) Sb- 122 3E-5 3E-5 Sb-124 2E-5 2E-5 Sb-125 lE-4 1E-4 Sb-126. 3E-6 3E-6 Arsenic (33) As-73 5E-4 5E-4 As-74 5E-5 5E-5 As-76 2E-5 2E-5 As-77 8E-5 8E-5 IV Astatine (85)

Barium (56)

At-211 Ba-131 2E-6 2E-4 7E-5 2E-4

-r- Ba-140 3E-5 2E-5 Berkelium (97) Bk-249 6E-4 6E-4

(-)

Bk-250 2E-4 2E-4 Beryllium (4) Be-7 2E-3 2E-3 Bismuth (83) Bi-206 4E-5 4E-5 Bi-207 6E-5 6E-5 Bi-210. 4E-5 4E-5 Bi-212 4E-4 4E-4 I:j Bromine (35) Br-82 Br-83 3E-4 3E-6 4E-5 3E-6 L.d Cadmium (48) Cd-109 2E-4 2E-4 Cd-ll5m: 3E-5 3E-5 0

Cd-u15 3E-5 4E-5 Calcium (20) Ca-45 9E-6 2E-4 Ca-47 5E-5 3E-5 Californium (98) Cf-249 4E-6 2E-5 Cf-250 1E-5 3E-5

._J Cf-251 4E-6 3E-5 La Cf-252 7E-6 7E-6 Uv- Cf-253 1E-4 1E-4 Cf-254 1E-7 1E-7 Page 149 of 155

I Table F-I (Continued)

Salem ODOM Rev. 22 I

Element Isotope Soluble Con,.

(4Ci/ml)

Insoluble Conc.

(p.Ci/ml)

I Carbon (6)

Cerium (58)

C-14 Ce-141 Ce-143 8E-4 9E-5 4E-5 9E-5 4E-5 U

Cesium (55)

Ce-14 Cs-131 Cs-134m IE-5 2E-3 6E-3 1E-5 9E-4 IE-3 I

Cs,134 Cs-135' 9E-6 1E-4 4E-5 2E-4 I Cs-136 9E-5 6E-5 Chlorine (17)

Cs-137 C1-36 2E-5.

8E-5 4E-5 6E-5 I C0-38 4E-4 4E-4 Chromium (24)

Cobalt (27)

Cr-51 Co-57 2E-3 5E-4 2E-3 4E-4 I Co-58m 3E-3 2E-3.

Co-58 Co-60 1E-4 5E-5 9E-5 3E-5 I

Copper (29) Cu-64 3E-4 2E-4 Curium (96) Cm-242 Cm-243 2E-5 5E-6 2E-5 2E-5 I

Cm-244 7E-6 3E-5 Cm-245 Cm-246 4E-6 4E-6 3E-5 3E-5 I

C) Cm-247 4E-6 2E-5 0 Cm-248 Cm-249 4E-7 2E-_

1E-6 22E-3 I

0 Dysprosium (66) Dy-165 4E-4 4E-4 F--

Gr-Einsteinium (99)

Dy- 166 Es-253 4E-5 2E-5 4E-5 2E-5 I

z" Es-254m 2E-5 2E-5 0<1:

Li w

Es-254 Es-255 1E-5 3E-5 1E-5"-

3E-5 I

1 0

Erbium (68) Er- 169 9E-5 9E-5 z Er- 171 1E-4 1E-4 U-Europium (63) Eu-152 (9.2 hrs) 6E-5 6E-5 Eu-152 (13 yrs)

Eu-154 8E-5 2E-5 8E-5 2E-5 I Eu-155 2E-4 2E-4 0,

Fermium (100) Fm-254 Fm-255 1E-4 3E-5 1E-4 3E-5 I Of __ Fm-256 9E-7 9E-7 0

LLJ I

Page 150 of 155 D

I

Salem ODCM -Rev.22 Table F-1 (Continued)

Element Isotope -Soluble Cone. Insoluble Conc.

I* Fluorine (9) F-18 (4Ci/ml)

SE-4 (UCiiml) 5E-4 I Gadolinium (64) Gd-153 Gd-I 59 2E-4 8E-5 2E-4 8E-5 I Gallium (31)

Germanium (32)

Gold (79)

Ga-72 Ge-71 Au-196 4E-5 2E-3 2E-4 4E-5 2E-3 1E-4 I Au-198 Au-199 5E-5 2E-4 5E-5 2E-4 Hafnium (72) Hf-181 7E-5 7E-5 I Holmium (67)

Hydrogen (3)

Ho-166 H-3 3E-5 3E-3 3E-5 3E-3 Indium (49) In-i 13m 1E-3 .1E-3 I In- 114m In- 115m 2E-5 4E-4 2E-5 4E-4 In- 115 9E-5 9E-5 I Iodine (53) 1-125 1-126 2E-7 3E-7 2E-4 9E-5 1-129 6E-8 2E-4 I. 1-130 1-131 3E-6 3E-7 3E-6 6E-5 1-132 8E-6 2E-4 Iii 1-133 1E-6 4E-5 1-134 2E-5 6E-4 1-135 4E-6 7E-5 Iridium (77) Ir-190 2E-4 2E-4 Ix-192. 4E-5 4E-5 Ir-194 3E-5 3E-5 Iron (26) Fe-55 8E-4 2E-3 t/)

Fe-59 6E-5 5E-5 z Lanthanum (57) La-140 2E-5 2E-5 Lead (82) Pb-203 4E-4 4E-4.

z'0 Pb-210 1E-7 2E-4 Pb-212 2E-5 2E-5 tLL.

I°Of 0

Lutetium (71)

Manganese (25)

Lu- 177 Mn-52 Mn-54' 1E-4 3E-5 1E-4 1E-4 3E-5 1E-4 liy

Mn-56, Hg- 197m lE-4 2E-4 1E-4 2E-4 0° Q..

Hg-197 Hg-203 3E-4 2E-5 5E-4 IE-4 LJ Molybdenum (42) Mo-99* 2E-4 4E-5 z~

Page 151 of 155

$alem ODCM Rev. 22 I

Table F- I (Continued) I Element Isotope Soluble Conc.

(,uCi/il)

Insoluble Conc.

(pCi/m!)

I Neodymium (60) Nd-144 7E-5 8E-5 Nd-147 Nd-149 6E-5 3E-4 6E-5 3E-4 I

Neptunium (93) Np-237 3E-6 3E-5 Nickel (28)

Np-239 Ni-59 1E-4 2E-4 I E-4 2E-3 I

Ni-63 3E-5 7E-4 Niobium (41)

Ni-65 Nb-93m lE-4 4E-4 1E-4 4E-4 I

Nb-95 lE-4 1E,-4 Osmium (76)

Nb-97 Os-185 9E-4 7E-5 9E-4 7E-5 I

2E.3

-_Os-191 Os-191m Os-193 3E-3 2E-4 6E-5 2E-4 5E-5 I

Palladium (46)

Phosphorus (15)

Pd-103 Pd-109 P-32 3E-4 9E-5 2E-5 3E-4 7E-5 I 2E-5 0

Platinum (78) Pt-191 Pt-193m 1E-4 1E-3 1E-4 iE-3 I Pt-193 9E-4 2E-3

(-5 Pt-i 97m Pt-197 1E-3 IE-4 9E-4 1E-4 I Plutonium (94) Pu-238 5E-6 3E-5 I

C-.,

7 Pu-239 5E-6 3E-5 0

Zý Pu-240 5E-6 3E-5 0LJ Pu-241 2E-4 1E-3 V)

H-.

H.-

Pu-242 Pu-243 5E-6 3E-4 3E-5 3E-4 I

z Polonium (84) Po-210 7E-7 3E-5 0

0 LUL Potassium (19)

Praseodymium(59)

K-42 Pr-142 3E-4 3E-5 2E-5 3E-5 I

Pr-143 5E-5 SE-5 z

r-y Promethium (61) Pm-147 Pm-149 2E-4 4E-5 2E-4 4E-5 I

U-Protactinium(91) Pa-230 2E-4 2E-4 1,1 Pa-231 Pa-233 9E-7 IE-4 2E-5 1E-4 I

Page 152 of 155 02 D~ I

Salem ODCM Rev. 22 Table F-i (Continued)

I. Element Isotope Soluble Conc.

(,@Ci/ml)

Insoluble Conc.

(4Ci/ml)

Radium (88) Ra-223 7E-7 4E-6 Ra-224 2E-6 5E-6 Ra-226 3E-8 3E-5 Ra-228 3E-8 3E-5 Rhenium (75) Re- 183 6E-4 3E-4 Re-186 9E-5 5E-5 Re-187 3E-3 2E-3 Re-188 6E-5 3E-5 Rhodium (45) Rh-103m lE-2 1E-2 Io Rubidium (37)

Rh-105 Rb-86 IE-4 7E-5 1E-4 2E-5 Rb-87 I E-4 2E-4 Ruthenium (44) Ru-97 4E-4 3E-4 Ru- 103 8E-5 8E-5 Ru-103m 3E-6 3E-6 Ru-105 IE-4 1E-4 Ru-106, 1E-5 IE-5 "Samarium (62) Sm-147 6E-5 7E-5 Sm- 151 4E-4 4E-4 Sm-153 8E-5 8E-5 Scandium (21) Sc-46 4E-5 4E-5 Sc-47 9E-5 9E-5 Sc-48 3E-5 3E-5

.)

z -Selenium (34) Se-75 3E-4 3E-4 r-) Silicon (14) Si-31 9E-4 2E-4 Silver (47) Ag-105 1E-4 1E-4 Ag-1Orn 3E-5 3E-5 Ag-i ll 4E-5 4E-5

), Sodium (11) Na-22 4E-5 3E-5 Na-24 2E-4 3E-5 Strontium (38) Sr-85m 7E-3 7E-3 Lw Sr-85 1E-4 2E-4 Sr-89 3E-6 3E-5 Sr-90 3E-7 4E-5 Sr-91 7E-5 5E-5 Sr-92 7E-5 6E-5 Sulfur (16) S-35 6E-5 3E-4 1z2 0

i, Tantalum (73) Ta- 182 4E-5 4E-5 Page 153 of 155

Salem ODCM Rev. 22 I

Table F-I (Continued)

I I Element Isotope Soluble Conc. Insoluble Conc.

Technetium (43) Tc-96m

_(jCi/ml)

IE-2

(.Ci/ml) 1E-2 I

Tc-96 lE-4 5E-5 Tc-97m Tc-97 4E-4 2E-3 2E-4 8E-4 I

Tc-99m 6E-3 3E-3 Tellurium (52)

Tc-99 Te-125m 3E-4 2E-4 2E-4 IE-4 I

Te-127m 6E-5 5E-5 Te-127 Te-129m 3E-4 3E-5 2E-4 2E-5 I

Te-129 Te-131m Te-132 8E-4 6E-5 3E-5 8E-4 4E-5 2E-5 I

Terbium (65)

Thallium (81)

Tb-160 TI-200 TI-201 4E-5 4E-4 3E-4 4E-5 2E-4 2E-4 I

Thorium (90)

TI-202 TI-204 Th-227 1E-4 1E-4 2E-5 7E-5 6E-5 2E-5 I

ci-)

Th-228 Th-230 7E-6 2E-6 IE-5 3E-5 I (D Th-231 2E-4 2E-4.

z Th-232 Th-natural 2E-6 2E-6 4E-5 2E-5 I

Th-234 2E-5 2E-5 z

(D U)

Thulium (69) Tm-170 Tm-171 5E-5 5B-4 5E-5 5E-4 I

Tin (50) Sn-113 9E-5 8E-5 c-)

z" Tungsten (74)

Sn-124 W-181.

2E-5 4E-4 2E-5 3E-4 I

0 1E-4 I1E-4 Li Uranium (92)

W-185 W-187 U-230 7E-5 5E-6 6E-5

-5E-6 I

z U-U-232 U-233 U-234 3E-5 3E-5 3E-5 3E-5 3E-5 3E-5 I

L'U 0

U:

LU_

U-235 U-236 U-238 3E-5 3E-5 4E-5 3E-5 3E-5 4E5 I

U-240 U-natural 3E-5 3E-5 3E-5 3E-5 I 0

0.

(/3 ci-A LU" LU2 Page 154 of 155 I

I ci,)

D,'

Salem ODCivi Rev. 22 Table F - i (Continued)

Element Isotope Soluble Conc. Insoluble Conc.

I. Vanadium (23) V-48 I(ýiCi/ml) 3E-5

[(.tCi/ml) 3E-5 I Ytterbium (70)

Yttrium Yb-175 Y-90 Y-91m 1E-4 2E-5 313-3 IE-4 2E-5 3E-3 I Y-91 Y-92 Y-93 3E-5 6E-5 3E-5 3E-5 6E-5 3E-5 I Zinc_(30) Zn-65 Zn-69m 1E-4 7E-5 2E-4 6E-5 Zn-69 2E-3 2E-3 I Zirconium (40) Zr-93 Zr-95 8E-4 6E-5 8E-4 6E-5 Zr-97 2E-5 2E-5 I Any single radio-nuclide not listed 3E-6 3E-6 above with decay I mode other than alpha emission or spontaneous fission I. and with radio -

active half-life greater than 2 hours2.314815e-5 days 5.555556e-4 hours 3.306878e-6 weeks 7.61e-7 months Any single radio- 3E-8 3E-8 nuclide not listed above, which decays by alpha emission or spontaneous fission.

Notes:

ugz 1. If the identity of any radionuclide is not known, the limiting values for purposes of this table shall be: 3E-8 aCi/ml.

w

2. If the identity and concentration of each radionuclide are known, the limiting values should be derived as follows: Determine, for each radionuclide in the mixture, the ratio between the quantity present in the mixture and the limit otherwise established in Appendix B for the specific' radionuclide not in a mixture. The sum of such ratios for all the radionuclides in the mixture may not exceed "1" (i.e. "unity").

,0 Page 155 of 155

ML101300370

Text

Navigation menu

Search