Text

Response to 3rd Round of RAI License Amendment Request to Adopt National Fire Protection Association Standard 805, Performance-Based Standard for Fire Protection for Light Water Reactor Generating Plants
	ML100990363
Person / Time
Site:	Harris
Issue date:	04/05/2010
From:	Warner J; Progress Energy Carolinas
To:	; Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
	HNP-10-040, TAC MD8807
	Download: ML100990363 (45)
	v • d • e

PORTIONS OF ENCLOSURE 2 TO THIS LETTER CONTAIN SENSITIVE INFORMATION SUBMITTED UNDER 10 CFR 2.390(d)(1).

Progress Energy

-APR 6,5 2010 Serial: HNP-10-040 10 CFR 50.90 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTENTION: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, UNIT 1 DOCKET NO. 50-400/RENEWED LICENSE NO. NPF-63 RESPONSE TO THIRD ROUND OF REQUESTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING LICENSE AMENDMENT REQUEST TO ADOPT NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOCIATION STANDARD 805, "PERFORMANCE-BASED STANDARD FOR FIRE PROTECTION FOR LIGHT WATER REACTOR GENERATING PLANTS" (TAC NO. MD8807)

References:

1. Letter from C. L. Burton to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (Serial:

HNP-09-094), "Third Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request to Adopt National Fire Protection Association Standard 805, 'Performance-Based Standard for Fire Protection for Light Water Reactor Generating Plants' (TAC NO. MD8807)", dated October 09, 2009

2. Letter from C. L. Burton to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (Serial:

HNP-1 0-008), "Response to Second Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request to Adopt National Fire Protection Association Standard 805, 'Performance-Based Standard for Fire Protection for Light Water Reactor Generating Plants' (TAC NO. MD8807)", dated February 04, 2010 Ladies and Gentlemen:

The Harris Nuclear Plant (HNP) has received via email a third round of requests from the NRC for additional information needed by the NRC to facilitate review of HNP's License Amendment Request to Adopt National Fire Protection Association Standard 805, "Performance-Based Standard for Fire Protection for Light Water Reactor Generating Plants." provides HNP's responses to the NRC's requests for additional information.

As a result of these responses, certain parts of HNP's Transition Report Supplement 3 and 3a, as submitted via References 1 and 2, require revision. Enclosure 2 contains the updated portions as follows:

Table 4-8-1, "Required Automatic Suppressions Systems," entire Table replaced Table 4-8-2, "Required Automatic Fire Detection Systems," entire Table replaced Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc.

Harris Nuclear Plant P. 0. Box 165 o

New Hill, NC 27562

PORTIONS OF ENCLOSURE 2 TO THIS LETTER CONTAIN SENSITIVE INFORMATION SUBMITTED UNDER 10 CFR 2.390(d)(1).

Serial: HNP-10-040 Page 2 Attachment C, "Table B-3 Fire Area Transition," entire Attachment replaced - Security Related Information Attachment K, "Licensing Action Report," entire Attachment replaced - Security Related Information Attachment Y, "Fire PRA Insights," replacement page Y Security Related Information In accordance with 10 CFR 50.91(b), HNP is providing the state of North Carolina with a copy of this response.

This document contains no new or revised regulatory commitments.

Please refer any questions regarding this submittal to Mr. Dave Corlett, Supervisor -

Licensing/Regulatory Programs, at (919) 362-3137.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on APR 0 5 2010 Sincerely, John C. Warner Manager - Support Services Harris Nuclear Plant JCW/kms

Enclosures:

1.

Response to Third Round of Requests for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request to Adopt NFPA 805, "Performance-Based Standard for Fire Protection for Light Water Reactor Generating Plants"

2.

Replacement Attachments for HNP Transition Report - Portions contain Security Related Information Cc:

Mr. J. D. Austin, NRC Sr. Resident Inspector, HNP Mr. W. L. Cox, Il1, NC DENR Mr. L. A. Reyes, NRC Regional Administrator, Region II Ms. M. G. Vaaler, NRC Project Manager, HNP to SERIAL: HNP-10-040 SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, UNIT NO. 1 DOCKET NO. 50-400/RENEWED LICENSE NO. NPF-63 RESPONSE TO THIRD ROUND OF REQUESTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING LICENSE AMENDMENT REQUEST TO ADOPT NFPA 805, "PERFORMANCE-BASED STANDARD FOR FIRE PROTECTION FOR LIGHT WATER REACTOR GENERATING PLANTS" By letter dated May 29, 2008, as supplemented by letters dated November 14, 2008, December 11, 2008, August 13, 2009, August 28, 2009, October 9, 2009, and February 4, 2010, Carolina Power & Light Company (the licensee), now doing business as Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc., submitted a proposed amendment for the Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1 (HNP or Harris).

The proposed amendment would transition the fire protection program to a performance-based, risk-informed program based on the National Fire Protection Association Standard 805 (NFPA 805), "Performance-Based Standard for Fire Protection For Light Water Reactor Generating Plants," 2001 Edition, in accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Section 50.48(c) (10 CFR 50.48(c)). NFPA 805 allows the use of performance-based methods, such as fire modeling, and risk-informed methods, such as Fire Probabilistic Risk Assessment, to demonstrate compliance with the nuclear safety performance criteria.

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff has reviewed the licensee's submittals and determined that it needs responses to the following requests for additional information (RAIs), whose numbering corresponds to that found in the August 6, 2009, RAI letter (ML092170715).

Post MCR Abandonment Risk of Recovery Actions Away from Primary Control Station For three fire scenarios in the main control room, a CCDP of 0. 1 is applied which is to represent

"... the CCDP associated with shutdown from outside the Main Control Room... [via the]

combination of the HEP and random failures associated with the remaining plant capability" (this is identified as Note 2 in Table 10 of Attachment 4 to HNP-F/PSA-0079). No technical basis has been provided which demonstrates that a 0. 1 probability is conservative for the combination of required recovery actions and random failures associated with alternate shutdown scenarios.

The licensee needs to justify that, when the total human error probability of these actions is included with the random failures, the CCDP is bounded by the 0. 1 value.

Response

General Discussion The Main Control Room (MCR) abandonment strategy for Harris was developed using the deterministic criteria. This criteria is based on having one train of equipment necessary for safe shutdown remaining free of fire damage along with no offsite power or feed and bleed. The procedure for alternate shutdown (ASD) was previously approved and has not been revised using more realistic MCR scenarios. Although the subject actions are deterministically classified as recovery actions, they may not be risk significant if more realistic fire scenarios are considered.

Because of the limited application of ASD in the risk analysis, the Fire PRA used a screening probability of 0.1 for the CCDP and did not develop a detailed probabilistic analysis of the equipment impacts and HEPs. Although the question is specific to the justification of CCDP for the subject actions, the response also addresses the overall risk of these actions in order to Page 1 of 11 to SERIAL: HNP-10-040 SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, UNIT NO. 1 DOCKET NO. 50-400/RENEWED LICENSE NO. NPF-63 RESPONSE TO THIRD ROUND OF REQUESTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING LICENSE AMENDMENT REQUEST TO ADOPT NFPA 805, "PERFORMANCE-BASED STANDARD FOR FIRE PROTECTION FOR LIGHT WATER REACTOR GENERATING PLANTS" characterize the level of sensitivity of the CCDP to the acceptability of the overall risk of these actions.

Risk Evaluation Process Because a detailed PRA analysis was not performed for ASD (including the subject actions), a qualitative approach is being used to justify the risks are acceptable and bounded by the CDF provided in the response to an earlier RAI (RAI 3.72). The table provided at the end of this response lists the recovery actions referenced in the question. For each action the following factors are considered and an "order of magnitude" estimate of the CCDP is provided. While the probabilities provided are not based on detailed analyses, they provide insights to justify the acceptability of the bounding values.

" Success criteria Consequences of failing to perform an action are considered for the impact to core damage. In some cases, a basis for a determination that core damage would not be expected is supported, even though the action is still considered to be required for compliance purposes.

" Scenario frequencies and NSP impacts For HNP, the MCR abandonment actions are only credited when the fire has not been suppressed prior to reaching the area habitability thresholds. Therefore, the likelihood of implementing these actions is a function of ignition frequency of a given panel section and the non-suppression probability. The values used in the HNP LAR (and those provided in the previous response to RAI 3.72) did not include the planned installation of incipient detection in the MCB, which will potentially reduce the ignition frequency for challenging fires and further reduce the risk. In addition, if the incipient fire detection system (IFDS) were to fail, the area is still continuously occupied, resulting in a high confidence in successful suppression. These factors indicate a very low likelihood that abandonment will occur.

" Timing, complexity, and training impacts Manual Action Feasibility reviews have been performed for all of the actions to validate that they can be performed within the specified times. Thermal hydraulic insights are primarily based on qualitative assessment and internal events PRA information. The operators do not rely on cues and will perform the actions immediately based on the guidance in the fire procedures. Qualitative review indicates that there could be substantial time margin to complete the actions.

The actions are all in close proximity to the primary control station and each other, are clearly identified with special SSD high visibility tags and involve basic skills on which the operators are trained. The actions are relatively simple to perform and do not require any special tools. Training is conducted periodically to familiarize the operators with the requirements and steps for these actions.

Page 2 of 11 to SERIAL: HNP-10-040 SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, UNIT NO. 1 DOCKET NO. 50-400/RENEWED LICENSE NO. NPF-63 RESPONSE TO THIRD ROUND OF REQUESTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING LICENSE AMENDMENT REQUEST TO ADOPT NFPA 805, "PERFORMANCE-BASED STANDARD FOR FIRE PROTECTION FOR LIGHT WATER REACTOR GENERATING PLANTS" Related equipment failure impacts Several of the actions are only important if there are additional equipment failures beyond the specific fire related failures. If the equipment is not specifically protected, it is assumed to fail. Fires in the MCB are typically confined to one panel section. Since the MCB at Harris is particularly sparse in exposed cables, significant fire growth is difficult to postulate. Therefore, it is highly unlikely that there will be additional fire induced failures beyond that impacted by the panel where the fire starts. The additional failures contribute to reducing the CCDP of scenarios involving the subject actions.

Conclusions Based on the individual assessment provided for each of the actions in the table below, it is reasonable to conclude that the CCDP estimate of 0.1 can be used to conservatively evaluate the risk of the subject recovery actions.

The total risk (CDF) associated with MCR abandonment was provided as 4.99E-07/yr based on a CCDP of 0.1 and the expected plant configuration at the time of the LAR. All of the subject recovery actions start from fires developing in the MCB. Considering the addition of incipient detection, and the discussions presented in the tables, this risk value is shown to be bounding for the set of recovery actions outside the ACP even if the HEPs for those actions are set to 1.0.

Component ID Component Description of Action Who' PRA Discussion Desc (Tm) 1 BD-37:009 S/G 1B De-energize 1 BD-30 at PP-1A31 1 BOP If this valve fails open there will be BLOWDOWN ckt 4, in fire zone 1-A-BAL-J in (lm) a higher flow demand on the TD FCV order to fail the valve closed.

AFW pump and a faster use of inventory. Failure to complete this PP-1A311 is located in the action does not fail the PRA penetration room (1-A-BAL-J) success criteria and the HEP is located directly behind 1-A-negligible.

SWGRA where the Transfer Panel SA is located. This breaker is a.

CCDP = epsilon small breaker similar to the breakers in a house electrical (Note: MCR abandonment does not panel. 1-A-SWGRA is adjacent to credit offsite power. If these valves 1-A-SWGRB which enclosed the are open following abandonment, ACP on three sides.

then offsite power would be available allowing other potentially This is a Required Action to offsetting risk factors.)

insure that the decay heat is being removed through the SG PORVs, which are controlled from the ACP, and not being removed from Steam Generator Blowdown which the operator does not have control over as the decay heat load drops off.

Cables/Controls in MCB Section 1B1 Page 3 of 11 to SERIAL: HNP-10-040 SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, UNIT NO. 1 DOCKET NO. 50-400/RENEWED LICENSE NO. NPF-63 RESPONSE TO THIRD ROUND OF REQUESTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING LICENSE AMENDMENT REQUEST TO ADOPT NFPA 805, "PERFORMANCE-BASED STANDARD FOR FIRE PROTECTION FOR LIGHT WATER REACTOR GENERATING PLANTS" 1CH-1 16:002 1CH-126:002 VALVE CH-B4SB VALVE CX-B4SA De-energize 1CH-116 and 1CH-125 at MCC power panel PP-1B211-SB, CKT 14, in fire zone 1-A-BAL-C to fail the valves closed.

PP-1 B21 1 is located in the penetration room (1-A-BAL-C) located directly behind 1-A-SWGRB where the Transfer Panel SB is located. This breaker is a small breaker similar to the breakers in a house electrical panel.

This is a Required Action to insure the B chiller remains available in the event of a multiple spurious opening of two normally shut in-series cross connect valves Cables/Controls in AEP-1 BOP (2m)

If the cross connects are not closed there is a potential for pressure surging to challenge the relief valve. If the valve lifts and fails to close the CH system can fail to operate as desired. However, a loss of room cooling does not result in immediate consequences, particularly for a plant with minimal heat loads. Based on the internal events PRA, the limiting equipment is a fully loaded charging pump at 2 hours2.314815e-5 days 5.555556e-4 hours 3.306878e-6 weeks 7.61e-7 months . The switchgear rooms do not reach temperature thresholds until well after 4 hours4.62963e-5 days 0.00111 hours 6.613757e-6 weeks 1.522e-6 months .

Because the presence of pressure surging and a stuck open relief valve is not a certainty, it is not likely to result in significant consequences. This action is near the ACP and is simple and easy to perform.

Considering these factors, an estimate of the CCDP is as follows:

Pr-MSO - 0.6*0.6 = 0.36 Pr-Surging - 0.9 Pr-Stuck Open Relief- 0.1 Pr-HEP - 0.1 CCDP = 0.36*0.9*0.1*0.1

= 0.003 This action would only be necessary given a loss of seal cooling and seal injection.

Because no credit is given for MCR abandonment if the fire is in the CCW section of the control board, this action also assumes failure of CCW and the Alternate Seal injection (ASI) pump. Tripping the RCPs remotely is a simple, straight forward action and is performed in the vicinity of the ACP.

Considering these factors, an estimate of the CCDP is as follows:

Pr-Loss of CCW - 0.01 Pr-Loss of ASI - 0.01 HEP-0.1 (for all three pumps)

+

I I

t 1RC-RCPA:006 1 RC-RCPB:006 1RC-RCPC:006 RCP A RCP B RCP C Three actions to locally trip the affected RCPs per AOP-004 (RCP-A at Aux Bus 1A-5 in 1-A-SWGRA; RCP-B at Aux Bus 1 B-9 or RCP-C at Aux Bus 1C-2 in 1-A-SWGRB).

These breakers are located in 1-A-SWGRA and 1-A-SWGRB (6.9 KV Breakers) - there is a JPM strictly for tripping the B RCP Breaker.

These will remain required actions since the CCW supply to the motor coolers is not analyzed/protected and the return is at risk (common with the Thermal Barrier cooling).

BOP (3m)

Page 4 of 11 to SERIAL: HNP-10-040 SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, UNIT NO. 1 DOCKET NO. 50-400/RENEWED LICENSE NO. NPF-63 RESPONSE TO THIRD ROUND OF REQUESTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING LICENSE AMENDMENT REQUEST TO ADOPT NFPA 805, "PERFORMANCE-BASED STANDARD FOR FIRE PROTECTION FOR LIGHT WATER REACTOR GENERATING PLANTS" Cables/Controls in MCB Section 1C CCDP =.01 *.01

0.1 = 1E-05 (Note: MCR abandonment does not credit offsite power. If the RCPs are running following abandonment, then offsite power would be available allowing other potentially offsetting risk factors.)

ESFAS-CS Remove control power fuses and open breaker for 1 CT-E004 at 480V Emergency Bus 1A2-SA in Fire Area 1-A-SWGRA and remove control power fuses and open breaker for 1 CT-E005 at 480V Emergency Bus 1B2-SB in Fire Area 1-A-SWGRB.

These breakers are located in 1-A-SWGRA and 1-A-SWGRB (480 V Breakers) - there is a JPM for tripping the Rod Drive MG Set that is a similar breaker.

This action is a DID action since an alternate source of makeup is available.

Cables/Controls for Spray Pumps/discharge valves in MCB Section 1AA CNMT Spray Actuation Signal comes from MCB Section 1A1 (takes multiple spurious for either the CNMT Spray (2/4 switches, or the pump and discharge valve.)

BOP (5m)

This action is intended to mitigate or suspend a spurious containment spray actuation that could drain the RWST. Based on analysis, there is about 91 minutes before the RWST is drained, allowing over 60 minutes to stop the pumps and preserve charging inventory.

If the RWST is lost the new ASI pump is capable of providing a source of RCP seal cooling and RCS makeup via the seals.

Therefore this action would also need a failure of the ASI pump.

This action is performed in the vicinity of the ACP and is simple and straight forward.

Considering these factors, an estimate of the CCDP is as follows:

Pr - Loss of ASI - 0.01 HEP - 0.1 CCDP = 0.01

0.1 = 0.001 i

i 1D1-4D 1D2-5B PZR B/U HTR GPD POWER PANEL SUPPLY (PHPP-1 D)

PZR HTR GPC POWER PANEL SUPPLY (PHPP-1C)

Damage to these cables may cause associated heater groups to spuriously operate. Two actions remove control power fuses and open breaker 4D at 480V Auxiliary Bus 1D1 in Fire Area 1-A-SWGRA.

RO (3m)

These breakers are located in 1-A-SWGRA and 1-A-SWGRB (480 V Breakers - there is a JPM for tripping the Rod Drive MG Set that is a similar breaker.

This is a Required Action to aid in operator control of RCS pressure.

Pressurizer Backup Heater groups A and B (Which account for 861 of These heaters are not controllable at the ACP. If they were to spuriously actuate there is a potential for RCS pressure control problems over time. Because the majority of heater control (61.5%) is available and AFW can be used to offset the impact, this event does not have immediate consequences, if any. This action is performed in the vicinity of the ACP and is simple and straight forward.

Considering these factors, an estimate of the CCDP is as follows:

Pr-Loss of AFW - 0.01 HEP - 0.1 Page 5 of 11 to SERIAL: HNP-10-040 SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, UNIT NO. 1 DOCKET NO. 50-400/RENEWED LICENSE NO. NPF-63 RESPONSE TO THIRD ROUND OF REQUESTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING LICENSE AMENDMENT REQUEST TO ADOPT NFPA 805, "PERFORMANCE-BASED STANDARD FOR FIRE PROTECTION FOR LIGHT WATER REACTOR GENERATING PLANTS" 1400 KW of the installed heater CCDP = 0.01

0.1 = 0.001 capacity or 61.5%) are available on the ACP.

Following a reactor trip, which is initiated from the MCR before abandonment, or occurs from the transfer to the ACP, RCS Pressure normally drops, since the secondary will be reducing RCS temperature from 588.8 (Average) to 557 degrees F. The pressure drop is due to RCS volume shrink. Normally, all four sets of pressurizer heaters energize to return pressure to normal. After pressure is returned to normal, the backup heaters de-energize and the control heaters modulate to maintain RCS pressure. Following transfer to the ACP, Backup (Pressurizer)

Heater Group B will not automatically de-energize but is under operator control.

Other Methods To Control RCS Pressure Indirectly Also under operator control is the ability to feed Steam Generators (cold water from the CST) which will tend to cool the RCS, and the ability to control RCS temperature by dumping steam using the SG PORVs (available from Loops A and B), and the usage of steam to power the TDAFW Pump.

Cables/Controls in MCB Section 1A2 1 FW-MFPA Two actions to remove control RO The MFWPs are not controllable at 1 FW-MFPB power and trip 1 FW-MFPA at Aux (6m) the ACP. There is some potential Bus 1A-6 in 1-A-SWGRA and that flow control failures could lead 1FW-MFPB at Aux Bus 1B-6 in 1-to a SG overfill and a possible A-SWGRB.

failure of the TD AFW pump. Both MD AFW pumps and potentially These breakers are located in 1-MFWP would still be able to A-SWGRA and 1-A-SWGRB (6.9 provide core cooling. Based on KV Breakers) - there is a JPM for these additionally needed failures, tripping the B RCP Breaker which the risk of this action is determined is a similar breaker.

to be well below 0.1, and thus be bounded by the current analysis.

These are required actions since This action is performed in the Page 6 of 11 to SERIAL: HNP-10-040 SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, UNIT NO. 1 DOCKET NO. 50-400/RENEWED LICENSE NO. NPF-63 RESPONSE TO THIRD ROUND OF REQUESTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING LICENSE AMENDMENT REQUEST TO ADOPT NFPA 805, "PERFORMANCE-BASED STANDARD FOR FIRE PROTECTION FOR LIGHT WATER REACTOR GENERATING PLANTS" the Main FW Reg valves are not transferred to the ACP. (The Main FW Pumps power was assumed lost since we had to postulate a loss of offsite power.)

Cables/Controls in MCB Section 1B1 vicinity of the ACP and is simple and straight forward.

Pr-Loss of AFP - 0.01 HEP - 0.1 (both MFPs)

CCDP = 0.01

0.1 = 0.001 (Note: MCR abandonment does not credit offsite power or MFW. If the FWPs are running following abandonment, then offsite power would also be available and there will likely be potentially offsetting risk factors.)

1RH-66:002 HEAT EX B Manually control RHR flow by SSAO This action is not needed to FLOW locally throttling 1 RH-58 and 1 RH-achieve a safe and stable CONTROL 66 per existing station procedures.

condition, but only for cold (HCV-603B) shutdown. The Fire PRA risk will ADDED BY:

Cables/Controls in MCB Section have a negligible impact on this EDBR# 85 1A1, however the action is analysis.

068 required based on a loss of instrument air resulting from a loss CCDP = epsilon of offsite power 1SI-359:002 LOW HEAD SI De-energize 1SI-359:002 at MCC SSAO This action is not needed to TRAINS A & B 1A31-SA, Compartment 4B, in fire achieve a safe and stable TO HOT LEG zone 1-A-BAL-J to prevent condition, but only for cold potential diversion of core cooling shutdown. The Fire PRA risk will flow path. Then verify closed for have a negligible impact on this CSD or manually close 1SI-analysis.

359:002 in fire zone 1-A-BAL-A2.

CCDP = epsilon Cables/Controls in MCB Section 1A1 Total CCDP of the recovery actions is estimated to be less than 0.01. If the actions are all assumed to fail (i.e. - HEPs = 1.0) the total CCDP is still bounded 0.1.

1 Tm is the estimated manipulation time for the action BOP (Balance Of Plant operator)

RO (Reactor Operator)

SSAO (Safe Shutdown Auxiliary Operator)

RAI 2-2, Required Systems LAR Table 4-8-1 and 4-8-2 Update For Fire Area 5-F-FPP, fire zones 5-F-2-FPV1 and 5-F-2-FPV2 indicate that the areas are covered by automatic suppression systems. Based on a review of fire hazard analysis drawing CPL-2166 S-2112, this appears to be in error. The drawing does not show any suppression systems present for these fire zones.

Page 7 of 11 to SERIAL: HNP-10-040 SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, UNIT NO. 1 DOCKET NO. 50-400/RENEWED LICENSE NO. NPF-63 RESPONSE TO THIRD ROUND OF REQUESTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING LICENSE AMENDMENT REQUEST TO ADOPT NFPA 805, "PERFORMANCE-BASED STANDARD FOR FIRE PROTECTION FOR LIGHT WATER REACTOR GENERATING PLANTS" In addition, fire zone 5-F-FPC lists a "Yes" for "Suppression a Required System?," a "Yes" under "By Exemption or Deviation," and a "No" under "By EEEE/GL 86-10 Evaluation. " Based on the information provided in Attachment C to the Transition Report (NEI 04-02 B-3 Table), it would appear that the suppression systems for these areas are required because of EC 48007 and not due to a deviation. This fire area only credits a deviation for special purpose doors that does not involve any suppression or detection systems.

For Fire Area 5-F-FPP, Attachment C identifies that engineering equivalency evaluation EC 48007 is credited to demonstrate the acceptability of the metal hatches between the 216' and 236' elevations. This evaluation addresses two separate floor hatches located in the 236' El floor of the 5-F-FPP, Fuel Handling Building Fuel Pool Heat Exchangers area. One hatch (south end) separates Fire Area 5-F-FPP from Fire Area 5-W-BAL; the fire zone surrounding the south end hatch is 5-F-2-FPVI. The second hatch (north end) separates Fire Area 5-F-FPP from Fire Area 5-F-BAL; the fire zone surrounding the north end hatch is 5-F-2-FPV2.

Items cited in EC 48007 for determining the acceptability of the hatches are items "4. Area above the hatches has ionization detection" and "6. The area adjacent to the floor hatches (fuel pool heat exchanger area on 236 El) is protected by an automatic operating, full area sprinkler system.

The entries for Fire Area 5-F-FPP in table 4-8-2 for fire zones 5-F-2-FPV1 and 5-F-2-FPV2 indicate that the areas are covered by automatic detection systems, but list a "No" answer for "Detection a Required System?" Since EC 48007 credits these detection systems, the entries should be corrected to make them required and reference EC 48007.

In addition, fire zone 5-F-2-FPC lists a "Yes" answer for "Suppression a Required System?" and includes a "Yes" answer for "Exemption or Deviation" but a "No" answer for "By EEEE/GL 86-10 Evaluation." Based on the information provided in Attachment C of the Transition Report, it would appear that the detection systems for these areas are required because of EC 48007 and not due to a deviation. This fire area only credits a deviation for special purpose doors that does not involve any suppression or detection systems.

Please provide a response that addresses these discrepancies and clearly states which detection and suppression systems are required and why for fire zones 5-F-2-FPC, 5-F-2-FPVI and 5-F-2-FPV2 in fire area 5-F-FPP.

Response

These questions address suppression and/or detection systems in three adjacent fire zones in the Fuel Handling Building which are being considered as "Required Systems" as a result of the crediting of metal floor/ceiling hatches which have been evaluated in EC 48007 and EC 50804.

For Fire Zones 5-F-2-FPV1 and 5-F-2-FPV2 in Fire Area 5-F-FPP, Table 4-8-1 has been revised to correct the as-built arrangement to indicate these zones as not provided with automatic suppression systems.

Page 8 of 11 to SERIAL: HNP-10-040 SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, UNIT NO. 1 DOCKET NO. 50-400/RENEWED LICENSE NO. NPF-63 RESPONSE TO THIRD ROUND OF REQUESTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING LICENSE AMENDMENT REQUEST TO ADOPT NFPA 805, "PERFORMANCE-BASED STANDARD FOR FIRE PROTECTION FOR LIGHT WATER REACTOR GENERATING PLANTS" The basis for requiring the Fire Zone 5-F-2-FPC suppression system in Table 4-8-1 is both a fire door deficiency discussed in NLS-84-471 as well as two non-rated floor/ceiling hatches evaluated in EC 48007. As such, both the "By Exemption or Deviation" and the "By EEEE/GL 86-10 Evaluation" columns have been checked as "Yes" with the reference EEEE provided in the "EEEE Source" column along with the supporting note in the "EEEE Notes" column.

Since the suppression system in Fire Zone 5-F-2-FPC in Table 4-8-2 is required as discussed above, the actuation detection system is also required to support that system performance. As such, the "By EEEE/GL 86-10 Evaluation" column has been checked as "Yes" and the reference EEEE is provided in the "EEEE Source" column along with the supporting note in the "EEEE Notes" column. Since the "By Exemption or Deviation" column was previously checked "Yes" to satisfy the Deviation associated with NLS-84-471 for Fire Zone 5-F-2-FPC, this requires no change.

The non-rated metal hatch evaluations in EC 48007 and EC 50804 state in the Justification Basis, Item 4 and Item 5, respectively, that Fire Zones 5-F-2-FPV1 and 5-F-2-FPV2 on the 236' Elevation of the Fuel Handling Building have ionization detection. This referenced ionization detection is part of the Fuel Handling Building Ventilation System, Smoke Control System.

These detectors and this control system were originally installed to meet NFPA 90A requirements and not NFPA 72D and 72E requirements.

As stated in the HNP Fire Detection Design Basis Document - DBD-315: "Air duct detectors are provided within HVAC duct systems to indicate.presence of smoke. These detectors are part of the Smoke Control System and provide automatic trip of ventilation systems as required.

Indication of the air duct detectors is connected to the LFDCP [Local Fire Detection Control Panel] and transmitted to the MFDIC [Main Fire Detection Information Center - i.e. Main Fire Control Panel]." The DBD further states: "Upon detection of smoke in the ventilation system, the supply fans will automatically be tripped to prevent the spread of smoke and reduce the supply of air to the fire in accordance with NFPA 90A."

The in-duct ionization detection is located in the supply ductwork near the main air supply fans as well as in the exhaust ducts. The detectors located in the exhaust duct for Fire Zones 5-F FPV1 and 2 are Detector Instruments FAD-1 FP-8657A02 and B02 respectively. Therefore, the in-duct detectors will provide indication of fires to the LFDCP and then transmitted to the MFDIC in the areas served by the exhaust ductwork.

The credit taken in the EC 48007 and 50804 evaluations for the ionization detection in Fire Zones 5-F-2-FPV1 and 5-F-2-FPV2 is based on ionization detection which is not part of a NFPA 72 conforming detection system. However, smoke detection via the in-duct detectors will provide some level of early warning fire detection. Therefore, the basis for the non-rated metal hatches discussed in EC 48007 and EC 50804 being acceptable is still valid based on this non-code confirming detection installation. However, the other evaluation features, not considering the in-duct detection, provide a robust mitigating situation. These other features are 1) low or negligible combustible loading, 2) no safe shutdown circuits or equipment in the area, 3) low Page 9 of 11 to SERIAL: HNP-10-040 SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, UNIT NO. 1 DOCKET NO. 50-400/RENEWED LICENSE NO. NPF-63 RESPONSE TO THIRD ROUND OF REQUESTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING LICENSE AMENDMENT REQUEST TO ADOPT NFPA 805, "PERFORMANCE-BASED STANDARD FOR FIRE PROTECTION FOR LIGHT WATER REACTOR GENERATING PLANTS" postulated fire durations which will not challenge the structural ability of the metal hatches to perform as barrier separation components and, in the case of EC 48007, 4) the automatic operating fire suppression system provided in Fire Zone 5-F-2-FPC.

Based on the discussion above, the in-duct ionization detection previously associated with Fire Zones 5-F-2-FPV1 and 5-F-2-FPV2, will not be considered as "Required Detection" while being maintained as part of the NFPA 90A system design. Table 4-8-2 will continue to show that no detection exists for these zones. The Engineering Equivalency Evaluation that addresses the non-rated metal hatches on the 236' elevation of the Fuel Handling Building will be revised to eliminate credit for the in-duct ionization detection. This will be performed as part of the implementation of the NFPA 805 Program at HNP.

Following a final review of Deviation NLS-84-471, LAR Table 4-8-2 has also been revised to show three Fire Zones (12-A-5-CHF, 1-G-261 and 1-G-286) requiring the detection system to satisfy NLS-84-471.

Replacement Tables 4-8-1 and 4-8-2 reflecting the above updates are included with this submittal.

Additionally, during the review of these questions, it was noted that reference to the HNP Licensing Deviation NLS-84-471 was not summarized completely in LAR Attachment C and Attachment K. The Basis statement does not refer to suppression and/or detection systems which were discussed as supporting the overall deviation request. Therefore, the summary Basis statement for this Deviation has been revised to note that certain suppression and/or detection systems were a basis for original acceptance of the Deviation, as follows:

Replace the Existing statement:

"Deviation was approved based on the door's substantial construction, multiple-point locking mechanism, and the lack of fire exposure threat to the doors."

With the New statement:

"Deviation was approved based on the door's substantial construction, multiple-point locking mechanism, the lack of fire exposure threat to the doors, and, where listed in the table attached to this Deviation, installed suppression and/or detection systems."

This change impacted the following Fire Areas in Attachment C (B-3 Table):

12-A-BAL, 12-A-CR, 12-A-CRC1, 12-A-HV&IR, 1-A-BAL-A2, 11-A-BAL-B1, 1-A-BAL-J, 1-A-SWGRB, 5-F-BAL, 5-F-FPP, FPYARD and TURBINE The associated evaluation in Attachment K was also impacted by this change.

This submittal provides replacements for both Attachments C and K in their entirety.

Page 10 of 11 to SERIAL: HNP-10-040 SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, UNIT NO. 1 DOCKET NO. 50-400/RENEWED LICENSE NO. NPF-63 RESPONSE TO THIRD ROUND OF REQUESTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING LICENSE AMENDMENT REQUEST TO ADOPT NFPA 805, "PERFORMANCE-BASED STANDARD FOR FIRE PROTECTION FOR LIGHT WATER REACTOR GENERATING PLANTS" HNP 5-49, Request for Additional Information relating to a key assumption made in the Harris Fire PRA:

In Section Y. 1.5, Sources of Uncertainty in Attachment Y of the Harris Transition Report, provided on December 11, 2008, under the category of "Quantification," Table Y-7 had an entry "Credit for conceptual modification." Under the category of "Conservatism," the table states:

"No. The actual modification details are not finalized."

The entry provided in the table does not provide any justification that the modification(s) being installed will not adversely impact the fire PRA results and its identification as a key uncertainty implies that such an impact could be significant. This key uncertainty should either be removed (since the design of the modifications should be complete enough to show that the PRA is not impacted) or a sensitivity analysis provided to include whatever uncertainty the modifications could bring to the results (revise the PRA to include the uncertainty).

Response

Assumptions associated with the Fire PRA results are maintained during the NFPA 805 modification design and implementation phases through use of the risk screening processes similar to those which are applied in the post transition NFPA 805 change process. This process will flag any change impacting the risk results within the PRA assumptions. If a modification or change were proposed during implementation that could potentially adversely increases fire PRA risk, it would be identified as such and submitted to the NRC for approval.

Based on this, HNP has not allowed changes during modification implementation that would trip this threshold. All modifications, planned and proposed, will be reviewed prior to achieving full compliance with 10 CFR 50.48(c).

The following change has been made to the Harris Transition Report provided on October 9, 2009, Attachment Y, Section Y.1.5 ("Sources of Uncertainty"), Table Y-7: for the category "Quantification," item "Credit for conceptual modification," the "Conservatism" entry has been revised to indicate "Yes, Actual modification details were not finalized at the time of the LAR.

Any changes will be processed using an NFPA 805 Change Process, consistent with what will be utilized post-transition."

Page 11 of 11

.tb SERIAL:. H'NP.-.IO-008 S:HEARON HARR:IS :NU;L:EARP POWER PLANT, UNIT NO.

DOCKET N.5040.0/Rýr.EWD LV C ENSE-NO. NPF--63ý RESýPONSE TO ECObNbftD REQUET F'OR ADDITIONAL INFO0RMATION RE.GARD)ING,-ýH'E' LICENSE iAMEND'MENT REQUEST To, ADOPT' "NFPA805, PERFORMANCE-BASED sTANDARD FOR' FIRE PROTETION-FOR: LIGHT WATR REA TOR GENERATING PLANTS' UPDATED PAG.EsFOR HNPITRANSITION REPORT Portii6ns cOntain SecurityRelatedinform-atioh

Progress Energy HNP NFPA 805 Transition Report Progress Energy HNP NFPA 805 Transition Report Table 4-8-1 Required Automatic Suppression Systems For Performance For Deterministic Compliance (NFPA 805 § 4.2.3)

Based Compliance O*_.,

(NFPA 805 § 4.2.4) 0)

4)

By Credit Taken C. -V ccE in Change FSAR FIRE

-, 0 "2

CL ARE FIRE ZONE Area Description u) -o 0

C 4-n valnge AREA 3fl

o P

x Evaluation

w. 0)

Mp

)

M a-0-

EA MG 0r Iz E w

.r E,

,,w U.

Other CL M) xo 4)

W c w

w M

S Lu ERFBS CE m

Item U) co c

EC-50804 Support 3-hour barrier for two

~EC-50804-3 12-A-BAL 12-A-5-CHF RAB Units 1 And 2 Yes Yes No No Yes Attachment B, hatches in the area, No No No Balance of Plant Areas Att achmnt9B ESR 99-00395 -

Supports Pen Seal Deficiency RAB Units 1 And 2 12-A-BAL 12-A-5-DIH Balance of Plant Areas No No No No No N/A N/A No No No RAB Units 1 And 2 12-A-BAL 12-A-6-CHF1 B

ont Ara Yes No No No No N/A N/A No No No Balance of Plant Areas RAB Units 1 And 2 12-A-BAL 12-A-6-CHF2 Balance of Plant Areas Yes No No No No N/A N/A No No No Balance of Plant Areas 12-ABAL 2-A--HV RAB Units 1 And 2 12-A-BA 12-A-7-V Balance of Plant Areas No No No

'No No N/A N/A No No No

.,RAB

Room, 1Ad 2 Yes No No No N/A N/A No No No 12-A-BAL 1-A--4-COMC Balance of Plant Areas No o

No o

No/A/Ao Noo 12-A-CR 12-A-6-CR1

<Control Room, RAB No No

ý.No

-No No N/A N/A No No No 12-A-CR 12-A-6-RT1.

Control Room, RAB Yes Yes No Yes No N/A N/A No No No ComprleRoo 12-A-CRC1 12-A-6-ARP1 Control Room No No No No No N/A N/A No No No Complex 12-A-CRC.1 12-A-6-CR Control Room No No No No No N/A N/A No No No I__ _ Complex II Control Room 12-A-CRC1 12-A-6-PICR1 Cope o

O "N

N oNAN/A No No No Page 68 - HNP NFPA 805 Transition Report - Supplement 3b.docx

Progress Energy HNP NFPA 805 Transition Report Progress Energy HNP NFPA 805 Transition Report Table 4-8-1 Required Automatic Suppression Systems For Performance For Deterministic Compliance (NFPA 805 § 4.2.3)

Based Compliance

.2

(NFPA 805 § 4.2.4)

4)

By Credit Taken CL.C-it 2=o1 "o.

(%

I in Change FSAR FIRE F

Z IR ZN AaertoBCd k

AE FIRE ZONE Area Description u)

,,,cx Evaluation AREA o0 0 0..

0o 0-z E

M ;P W M Lu cc O t h e r ww

~WOw uJ C>

a.

ERFBS CE U) fn C Item 12-A-CRC1 12-A-6-RCC1 Control Room No No No No No N/A N/A No No No Complex Heating, Ventilating, 12-A-HVIR 12-A-6-HV7 and Instrument Yes**

No No No No N/A N/A No No No Repairs, RAB Heating, Ventilating, 12-A-HVIR 12-A-6-IRR and Instrument No No No No No N/A N/A No No No Repairs, RAB 12-I-ESWPA 12-I-ESWPA Emergency Service No No No No No N/A N/A No No No Water Pump 1A 12-I-ESWPB 12-I-ESWPB Emergency Service No No No No No N/A N/A No No No Water Pump 1B 12-0-TA 12-0-TA Diesel Fuel Oil Storage No No No No No N/A N/A No No No Tank A 12-0-TB 12-0-TB Diesel Fuel Oil Storage No No No No No N/A N/A No No No Tank B 1-A-ACP 1-A-ACP Auxiliary Control Panel No No No No No N/A N/A No No No Room 1-A-BAL-A 1-A-3-TA RAB - EL 231 No No No No No N/A N/A No No No 1-A-BAL-A 1-A-4-TA RAB - EL 231 No No No No No N/A N/A No No No 1-A-BAL-A 1-A-1-FD RAB -EL 190 No No No No No N/A N/A No No No 1-A-BAL-A 1-A-1-PA RAB - EL 190 Yes**

Yes

Yes Yes No N/A N/A No No No Page 69 - HNP NFPA 805 Transition Report - Supplement 3b.docx

Progress Energy HNP NFPA 805 Transition Report Proqress Enemy HNP NFPA 805 Transition Report Table 4-8-1 Required Automatic Suppression Systems For Performance S-For Deterministic Compliance (NFPA 805 § 4.2.3)

Based Compliance

.2 P(NFPA 805 § 4.2.4)

(h o.0.

M

-1 By Credit Taken FSAR-FIRE "E

0 o 0T in Change ARE FIRE ZONE Area Description V

-) 0 w r-2 o

x Evaluation U ).5

.2, E

.*0>*x uJ*-

"'w 9

Other o AE 0,,

LU I

)

W 0 wl" Lu a.ERFBS CE

)

Item U

0 U )

z 1-A-BAL-A 1-A-2-MP RAB - EL 216 Yes**

Yes Yes Yes No N/A N/A No No No 1-A-BAL-A 1-A-2-PT RAB - EL 216 No No No No No N/A N/A No No No 1-A-BAL-A 1-A-34-RHXA RAB - EL 236-261 No No No No No N/A N/A No No No 1-A-BAL-A 1-A-3-COR RAB - EL 236 Yes**

Yes Yes Yes No N/A N/A No Yes No 1-A-SAL-A 1-A-3-MP RAB - EL 236 Yes**

Yes Yes Yes Yes EC 60257 Supports HVAC duct No Yes No Ew/o fire damper 1-A-BAL-A 1-A-3-PB RAB - EL 236 Yes**

Yes Yes Yes Yes EC 60257 Supports HVAC duct No Yes No

_____w/o fire damper 1-A-BAL-A 1-A-i-ED RAB - EL 190 No No No No No N/A N/A No No No 1-A-BAL-A 1-A-i-PB RAB - EL 190 Yes**

Yes Yes Yes No N/A N/A No No No 1-A-BAL-A 1-A-34-RHXB RAB - EL 236-261 No No No No No N/A N/A No No No ESR 99-00395 -

1-A-BAL-A 1-A-3-COMB RAB - EL 236 Yes**

Yes Yes Yes Yes ESR 99-00395 Supports Pen Seal Yes Yes No o Deficiency ESR 99-00395 -

1-A-BAL-A 1-A-3-COME RAB - EL 236 Yes**

Yes Yes Yes Yes ESR 99-00395 Supports Pen Seal No Yes No I_

W/o_

Deficiency ESR 99-00395 -

1-A-BAL-A 1-A-3-COMI RAB - EL 236 Yes**

Yes Yes Yes Yes ESR 99-00395 Supports Pen Seal No No No 1_

1-E23-6No N

No o

No/ADeficiency ESR 99-00395 -

1-A-BAL-A 1-A-4-CHFA RAB - EL-261 Yes**

Yes Yes Yes Yes ESR 99-00395 Supports Pen Seal Yes No No Deficiency 1-A-BAL-A 1-A-4-CHFB RAB - EL 261 Yes**

Yes Yes Yes No N/A N/A No No No Page 70 - HNP NFPA 805 Transition Report - Supplement 3b.docx

Progress Energy HNP NFPA 805 Transition Report Progress Energy HNP NFPA 805 Transition Report Table 4-8-1 Required Automatic Suppression Systems For Performance For Deterministic Compliance (NFPA 805 § 4.2.3)

Based Compliance o"

"(NFPA 805 § 4.2.4)

0)

By Credit Taken

V cc 0

in Change FSAR FIRE

-= 4 )

ARE FIRE ZONE Area Description V) 0

,,,0 C

Evaluation AREA

5.

0._

2 0

CL 0

za E

E,,

w Other 0

X.w W0WL L

M X

Lu LU ERFBS CE u)

Item U)

W r

1-A-BAL-A 1-A-4-CHFC RAB - EL 261 No No No No No N/A N/A No No No 1-A-BAL-A 1-A-4-COMI RAB - EL 261 Yes**

Yes Yes Yes' No N/A N/A Yes No No EC 52769 - This EC credits the sprinkler system in 1-A-BAL-B for justification of a penetration seal in EC 52769, the barrier to FA 1-A-1-A-BAL-B 1-A-4-CHLR RAB - EL 261 Yes**

Yes Yes Yes Yes R22, EC BAL-E. EC-63858 -

Yes Yes No 63858, ESR Credits suppression 99-00395 for HVAC duct penetration in ceiling w/o/ fire damper.

ESR 99-00395 -

Supports Pen Seal Deficiency 1-A-BAL-B 1-A-4-COR RAB - EL 261 No No No No No N/A N/A No No No ESR 99-00395 -

1-A-BAL-B 1-A-4-COMB RAB - EL 261 Yes**

Yes Yes Yes Yes ESR 99-00395 Supports Pen Seal No Yes No Deficiency 1-A-BAL-B 1-A-4-COME RAB - EL 261 Yes**

Yes Yes Yes No N/A N/A No Yes No 1-A-BAL-C 1-A-5-HVB RAB Unit 1 -Analysis No No No No No N/A N/A No No No Area C 1-A-BAL-D 1-A-3-COMC RAB Unit 1, Analysis Yes**

No No No No N/A N/A No No No Area D 1-A-BAL-D 1-A-4-COMC RAB Unit 1, Analysis No No No No No N/A N/A No No No I___ _

_Area D

I I

Page 71 - HNP NFPA 805 Transition Report - Supplement 3b.docx

Progress Energy HNP NFPA 805 Transition Report Proqress Enerqv HNP NFPA 805 Transition Report Table 4-8-1 Required Automatic Suppression Systems For Performance For Deterministic Compliance (NFPA 805 § 4.2.3)

Based Compliance (NFPA 805 § 4.2.4) p o"By Credit Taken "E

V E

4 in Change FSAR FIRE FIRE ZONE Area Description 0

inChange AREA 2>

Evao l u a t 0

_10 O

M,,

0.0z CL E-w C

E W

uO Other C.

X D>

w LwJ a.

.I a ERFBS CE CL)

Item u) mD 1-A-BAL-D 1-A-5-COMA RAB Unit 1, Analysis No No No No No N/A N/A No No No Area D 1-A-BAL-D 1-A-6-COMA RAB Unit 1, Analysis No No No No No N/A N/A No No No Area D 1-A-BAL-E 1-A-BAL-E RAB Unit 1 - Analysis No No No No No N/A N/A No No No Area 1-A-BAL-F 1-A-BAL-F RAB Unit 1 -Analysis No No No No No N/A N/A No No No Area F 1-A-BAL-G 1-A-BAL-G RAB Unit 1 - Analysis No No No No No N/A N/A No No No Area G 1-A-BAL-H 1-A-BAL-H RAB Unit 1 - Analysis Yes**

Yes No No Yes EC-60257 Supports HVAC Pen No No No Area H w/o damper 1-A-BAL-J 1-A-5-BATN RAB Unit 1 -Analysis No No No No No N/A N/A No No No Area J 1-A-BAL-J 1-A-5-CEH RAB Unit 1 - Analysis No No No No No N/A N/A No No No Area J 1-A-BAL-J 1-A-5-HV3 RAB Unit 1 - Analysis No No No No No N/A N/A No No No Area J 1-A-BAL-J 1-A-5-HVA RAB Unit 1 - Analysis No No No No No N/A N/A No No No Area J 1-A-BAL-K 1-A-46-ST RAB Unit 1 -Analysis No No No No No NIA N/A No No No Area K 1-A-BATA 1-A-BATA Battery Room A No No No No No N/A N/A No No No 1-A-BATB 1-A-BATB Battery Room B No No No No No N/A N/A No No No 1-A-CSRA 1-A-5-PICA Cable Spreading No No No No No N/A N/A No No No Room_

Page 72 - HNP NFPA 805 Transition Report - Supplement 3b.docx

Progress EnerqV HNP NFPA 805 Transition Report Progress Energy HNP NFPA 805 Transition Report Table 4-8-1 Required Automatic Suppression Systems For Performance C

V For Deterministic Compliance (NFPA 805 § 4.2.3)

Based Compliance

.2

__(NFPA 805 § 4.2.4) w 0

By Credit Taken

0. C-a: C-C."ox E

0*

in Change FSAR FIRE

=e ARIE FIRE ZONE Area Description u-o inChange a..

Evauatio AREA 0W~

~

u M- (

h MU 0 I

E2 a,

E o

2.

ujj CU Other O

U.

,, w ERFBS CE Lu Item Co m

m ESR 99-00395 -

1-A-CSRA 1-A-CSRA Cable Spreading Yes**

Yes No No Yes ESR 99-00395 Supports Pen Seal Yes Yes No Room A Deficiency 1-A-CSRB 1-A-5-PICB Cable Spreading No No No No No N/A N/A No No No Room B ESR 99-00395 -

1-A-CSRB 1-A-CSRB Cable Spreading Yes**

Yes No No Yes ESR 99-00395 Supports Pen Seal Yes Yes No Room B Deficiency Electrical Penetration ESR 99-00395 -

1-A-EPA 1-A-EPA Area A Yes**

Yes No No Yes ESR 99-00395 Supports Pen Seal Yes Yes No Deficiency 1-A-EPB 1-A-EPB Electrical Penetration Yes**

Yes No No No N/A N/A No Yes No Area B 1-A-SWGRA 1-A-SWGRA Switchgear Room A No No No No No N/A N/A No No No 1-A-SWGRB 1-A-SWGRB Switchgear Room B No No No No No N/A N/A No No No 1-C 1-C-1-BAL Containment Building, Yes**

Yes Yes Yes No N/A N/A No No No All Levels 1-C 1-C-1-CHFA Containment Building, Yes**

Yes Yes Yes No N/A N/A No No No El 221' 1-C 1-C-1-CHFB Containment Building, Yes**

Yes Yes Yes No N/A N/A No No No El 221' 1-C 1C1RCP Containment Building, No No No Yes No N/A N/A No No No 1A All Levels Page 73 - HNP NFPA 805 Transition Report - Supplement 3b.docx

Progress Energy HNP NFPA 805 Transition Report Table 4-8-1 Required Automatic Suppression Systems For Performance C

For Deterministic Compliance (NFPA 805 § 4.2.3)

Based Compliance 0"

.2___

(NFPA 805 § 4.2.4) 2 c By Credit Taken "CL T

in Change FSARAFIRE FIRE ZONE Area Description

.- -0 0

r--

oz C, _

Ehanio AREA 0

0~

W.~cEauto

'5

.2

-e~

(4

~

Z 1-.2 0

L-U)>

a-L 0

z E

,D U) cc E

2, W cc C

Other 0

w w

ERFBS CE U) o m

Item u) coI 1-C 1-C-1-RCP-Containment Building, Yes**

Yes Yes Yes No N/A N/A No No No 1 B All Levels 1-C 1-C-1-RCP-Containment Building, No No No Yes No N/A N/A No No No 11C All Levels 1-C 1-C-3-EPA Containment Building, Yes**

Yes Yes Yes No N/A N/A No No No El 261' 1-C 1-C-3-EPB Containment Building, Yes**

Yes Yes Yes No N/A N/A No No No El 261' 1

1-D-DGA 1-D-1-DGA-Diesel Generator 1A No No No No No N/A N/A No No No ASU 1-D-DGA 1-D-1-DGA-Diesel Generator 1A No No No No No N/A N/A No No No ER 1-D-DGA 1-D-1-DGA-Diesel Generator 1A Yes**

Yes No No No N/A N/A Yes No No RM 1-D-DGA 1-D-2-DGA-Diesel Generator 1A No No No No No N/A N/A No No No HVD 1-D-DGA 1-D-3-DGA-Diesel Generator 1A No No No No No N/A N/A No No No ES 1-D-DGA 1-D-3-DGA-Diesel Generator 1A No No No No No N/A N/A No No No HVR 1-D-DGB IDIDGB Diesel Generator 1B No No No No No N/A N/A No No No ASU 1-D-DGB 1-D-1-DGB-Diesel Generator 1B No No No No No N/A N/A No No No ER 1-D-1-DGB-1-D-DGB Diesel Generator 1B Yes**

Yes No No No N/A N/A Yes No No RM 1-D-DGB 1-D-2-DGB-Diesel Generator 1B No No No No No N/A N/A No No No HVD I__

I__

Page 74 - HNP NFPA 805 Transition Report - Supplement 3b.docx

Progress Energy HNP NFPA 805 Transition Report Table 4-8-1 Required Automatic Suppression Systems For Performance 0

For Deterministic Compliance (NFPA 805 § 4.2.3)

Based Compliance

.o_

_(NFPA 805 § 4.2.4) u)

"=*

0)

By Credit Taken CL o-w C-0=o1:

C- 'D 0

0 in Change

,c,'o mE' FSAR FIRE FIRE ZONE Area Description U-

"-a o

i Change AREA(2 Evaluation AREA~.

.W

.2 0

/

.)

,1 C

C

(

Z*

O.)

M

~

00 2

z 0

E w

LU Other a

LU ERFBS CE

c.

L ur LU LiiL a

m Item 1-D-DGB 1-D-3-DGB-Diesel Generator 1B No No No No No N/A N/A No No No ES I

1 -D-3-DGB-1-D-DGB HVR Diesel Generator 1B No No No No No N/A N/A No No No HVR Diesel Generator Fuel ESR 99-00395 -

1-D-DTA 1-D-DTA Oil Day Tank A Yes**

Yes No No Yes ESR 99-00395 Supports Pen Seal No No No Enclosure Deficiency Diesel Generator Fuel ESR 99-00395 -

1-D-DTB 1-D-DTB Oil Day Tank B Yes**

Yes No No Yes ESR 99-00395 Supports Pen Seal No No No Enclosure Deficiency 1-G 1-G-240 Turbine Generator Yes**

No' No No No N/A N/A No No No Building 1-G 1-G-261 Turbine Generator Yes**

Yes2 No Yes No N/A N/A No No No Building 1-G 1-G-286 Turbine Generator Yes**

Yes3 No Yes No N/A N/A Yes No No Building 1-G 1-G-314 Turbine Generator Yes**

No' No No No N/A N/A No No No Building 1-0-PA 1-0-PA Diesel Oil Pump Room Yes**

No No No No N/A N/A No No No A

I 1-0-PB 1-0-PB Diesel Oil Pump Room Yes**

No No No No N/A N/A No No No B

5-F-BAL 5-F-1-TK Fuel Handling Building No No No No No N/A N/A No No No Balance of Areas 5-F-BAL 5-F-23-CLP Fuel Handling Building No No No No No N/A N/A No No No Balance of Areas Page 75 - HNP NFPA 805 Transition Report - Supplement 3b.docx

Progress Energy HNP NFPA 805 Transition Report PrqrssEnm HN FA85TaniinRpr Table 4-8-1 Required Automatic Suppression Systems For Performance V

For Deterministic Compliance (NFPA 805 § 4.2.3)

Based Compliance

.o

__(NFPA 805 § 4.2.4)

Co 0

M By Credit Taken C.V -

E, 0-"-

in C h a n g e FSAR FIRE 3u a) o co CLhag ARE FIRE ZONE Area Description U. -0

4) x Evaluation AREA 0

")

o 0

.z

0.

0 E

P

-U (w

DC Other L).

w o

wuJ cc

0.

ERFBS CE 0u) m

>>,Item Coco 5-F-BAL 5-F-23-FTC1 Fuel Handling Building No No No No No N/A N/A No No No Balance of Areas 5-F-BAL 5-F-23-FTC2 Fuel Handling Building No No No No No N/A N/A No No No Balance of Areas 5-F-BAL 5-F-23-NFP1 Fuel Handling Building No No No No No N/A N/A No No No Balance of Areas 5-F-BAL 5-F-23-NFP2 Fuel Handling Building No No No No No N/A N/A No No No Balance of Areas 5-F-BAL 5-F-23-SFP1 Fuel Handling Building No No No No No N/A N/A No No No Balance of Areas 5-F-BAL 5-F-23-SFP2 Fuel Handling Building No No No No No N/A N/A No No No Balance of Areas 5-F-BAL 5-F-2-DEC Fuel Handling Building No No No No No N/A N/A No No No Balance of Areas 5-F-BAL 5-F-3-CHG Fuel Handling Building No No No No No N/A N/A No No No Balance of Areas 5-F-BAL 5-F-3-DE Fuel Handling Building No No No No No N/A N/A No No No Balance of Areas 5-F-BAL 5-F-3-DEC Fuel Handling Building No No No No No N/A N/A No No No Balance of Areas Page 76 - HNP NFPA 805 Transition Report - Supplement 3b.docx

Progress Energy HNP NFPA 805 Transition Report Progress Energy HNP NFPA 805 Transition Report Table 4-8-1 Required Automatic Suppression Systems For Performance For Deterministic Compliance (NFPA 805 § 4.2.3)

Based Compliance o(NFPA 805 § 4.2.4)

S E0 M

By Credit Taken

.- " )

c in Change FSAR FIRE 0C ARE FIRE ZONE Area Description U)o O

X Evaluation AREA oco

.2 0

LIU'

>1 CL0 0

E

.~c.

E Mo Other E.

LU w LL uJ

w.

ERFBS CE uL m

Item 5-F-BAL 5-F-3-HV Fuel Handling Building No No No No No N/A N/A No No No Balance of Areas 5-F-BAL 5-F-3-MFTC Fuel Handling Building No No No No No N/A N/A No No No Balance of Areas 5-F-BAL 5-F-3-NF Fuel Handling Building No No No No No N/A N/A No No No Balance of Areas 5-F-BAL 5-F-3-SC Fuel Handling Building No No No No No N/A N/A No No No Balance of Areas 5-F-BAL 5-F-3-STR Fuel Handling Building No No No No No N/A N/A No No No Balance of Areas 5-F-BAL 5-F-4-BAL Fuel Handling Building No No No No No N/A N/A No No No Balance of Areas 5-F-CHF 5-F-3-CHFA Fuel Handling Building Yes**

No No No No N/A N/A No No No Emergency Exhaust 5-F-CHF 5-F-3-CHFB Fuel Handling Building Yes**

No No No No N/A N/A No No No Emergency Exhaust 5-F-CHF 5-F-3-CHF-Fuel Handling Building Yes No No No No N/A N/A No No No BAL Emergency Exhaust 5-F-CHF 5-F-3-DMNZ1 Fuel Handling Building Yes No No No No N/A N/A No No No Emergency Exhaust Page 77 - HNP NFPA 805 Transition Report - Supplement 3b.docx

Progress Energy HNP NFPA 805 Transition Report Pronress Enemy HNP NFPA 805 Transition Report Table 4-8-1 Required Automatic Suppression Systems For Performance V

For Deterministic Compliance (NFPA 805 § 4.2.3)

Based Compliance

.2 (NFPA 805 § 4.2.4) 0

)By Credit Taken CL E) 0 T

in Change FSARAFIRE FIRE ZONE Area Description o -

o Evaluation AREA O(5

.2ý

.2~

.. 2 0~Eauto 02

(~

O.

zoLJ-(0 E*

w Other L)

X xo M

w CL ERFBS CE u)

4) r0

>,Item 5-F-CHF 5-F-3-DMNZ2 Fuel Handling Building Yes No No No No N/A N/A No No No Emergency Exhaust Fuel Handling Building Supports 3-hour 5-F-FPP 5-F-2-FPC Fuel Pool Heat Yes**

Yes No Yes Yes EC 48007 barrier for two floor No No No Exchangers hatches in the area Fuel Handling Building 5-F-FPP 5-F-2-FPV1 Fuel Pool Heat No No No No No N/A N/A No No No Exchangers Fuel Handling Building 5-F-FPP 5-F-2-FPV2 Fuel Pool Heat No No No No No N/A N/A No No No Exchangers 5-0-BAL 5-0-BAL Diesel Fuel Oil Storage No No No No No N/A N/A No No No Area Balance 5-S-BAL 5-S-BAL Auxiliary Reservoir No No No No No N/A N/A No No No Screening Structure 5-W-BAL 1-A-2-COR Waste Processing No No No No No N/A N/A No No No Building 5-W-BAL 5-W-1-C1 Waste Processing No No No No No N/A N/A No No No Building 5-W-BAL 5-W-1-FDTK Waste Processing No No No No No N/A N/A No No No Building 5-W-BAL 5-W Waste Processing No No No No No N/A N/A No No No HCHTK Building 5-W-BAL 5-W Waste Processing No No No No No N/A N/A No No No LCHTK Building 5-W-BAL 5-W-1-SW Waste Processing No

-No No No No N/A N/A No No No Building I

I Page 78 - HNP NFPA 805 Transition Report - Supplement 3b.docx

Progress Energy HNP NFPA 805 Transition Report Progress Energy HNP NFPA 805 Transition Report Table 4-8-1 Required Automatic Suppression Systems For Performance r-For Deterministic Compliance (NFPA 805 § 4.2.3)

Based Compliance o0

__tNFPA 805 § 4.2.4) 2 By Credit Taken a cl E

0 in Change FSAR FIRE FIRE ZONE Area Description 0

2 Evaluation AREA 2o U)

W 0 o.

E) >

w w

Other LU >U L

Su aUJ.

ERFBS CE L

)

,>,Item 5-W-BAL 5-W-1-TK Waste Processing No No No No No N/A N/A No No No Building 5-W-BAL 5-W-1-TKS Waste Processing No No No No No N/A N/A No No No Building 5-W-BAL 5-W-I-VG 2 Waste Processing No No No No No N/A N/A No No No Building 5-W-BAL 5-W-1-VG-1 Waste Processing No No No No No N/A N/A No No No Building 5-W-BAL 5-W Waste Processing No No No No No N/A N/A No No No WHTK1 Building I

I__

5-W-BAL 5-W Waste Processing No No No No No N/A N/A No No No WHTK2 Building 5-W-BAL 5-W-2-CMPT Waste Processing No No No No No N/A N/A No No No Building 5-W-BAL 5-W-2-COND Waste Processing No No No No No N/A N/A No No No Building 5-W-BAL 5-W-2-CR Waste Processing No No No No No N/A N/A No No No Building 5-W-BAL 5-W-2-DMNZ Waste Processing No No No No No N/A N/A No No No Building 5-W-BAL 5-W-2-EVAP Waste Processing No No No No No N/A N/A No No No Building 5-W-BAL 5-W-2-HTR Waste Processing No No No No No N/A N/A No No No Building 5-W-BAL 5-W-2-HVAC Waste Processing No No No No No N/A N/A No No No Building 5-W-BAL 5-W Waste Processing No No No No No N/A N/A No No No LCHTK-1 Building Page 79 - HNP NFPA 805 Transition Report - Supplement 3b.docx

Progress Energy HNP NFPA 805 Transition Report Progress Energy HNP NFPA 805 Transition Report Table 4-8-1 Required Automatic Suppression Systems For Performance For Deterministic Compliance (NFPA 805 § 4.2.3)

Based Compliance

.2 0

.o

__(NFPA 805 § 4.2.4) e*

cc By Credit Taken C. C-C-"

in C hange FSARAFIRE FIRE ZONE Area Description n

oho Evaluation AREA

.2 o

Eati

-* o "w

.*3o *

j.

0)Z=

q

.2 0~

a2)

-] -

0 E

0 M 0

"'--=

Other E

0 >

WULU LucOte o

uJ

a.

ERFBS CE o

C Item 5-W-BAL 5-W Waste Processing No No No No No N/A N/A No No No LCHTK2 Building 5-W-BAL 5-W-2-LHSTK Waste Processing No No No No No N/A N/A No No No Building 5-W-BAL 5-W-2-RPIR Waste Processing No No No No No N/A N/A No No No Building 5-W-BAL 5-W-2-TKS1 Waste Processing No No No No No N/A N/A No No No Building 5-W-BAL 5-W-2-TKS2 Waste Processing No No No No No N/A N/A No No No Building 5-W-BAL 5-W Waste Processing No No No No No N/A N/A No No No TLHSTK Building 5-W-BAL 5-W Waste Processing No No No No No N/A N/A No No No CWHE1 Building 5-W-BAL 5-W Waste Processing No No No No No N/A N/A No No No CWHE-2 Building 5-W-BAL 5-W-34-CWP Waste Processing No No No No No N/A N/A No No No Building 5-W-BAL 5-W-34-DRM Waste Processing No No No No No N/A N/A No No No Building 5-W-BAL 5-W-34-IC Waste Processing No No No No No N/A N/A No No No Building 5-W-BAL 5-W-3-MLR Waste Processing Yes No No No No N/A N/A No No No Building 5-W-BAL 5-W-3-STR Waste Processing Yes No No No No N/A N/A No No No Building 5-W-BAL 5-W-4-DRM Waste Processing No No No No No N/A N/A No No No Building Page 80 - HNP NFPA 805 Transition Report - Supplement 3b.docx

Progress Energy HNP NFPA 805 Transition Report PrqrssEnrg HN FA85TaniinRm Page 81 - HNP NFPA 805 Transition Report - Supplement 3b.docx

Progress Energy HNP NFPA 805 Transition Report Footnotes:

1 -

No Required Systems on this elevation. Non-Required Systems include: Condensate Pumps Deluge, Charcoal Filter Pre-Action, and Cable Vault Pre-Action.

2 -

Required Systems include: Condensate Booster Pump Deluge, Steam Generator Feed Pumps Deluge, and Turbine Lube Oil Reservoir (one system required for PMG). All other suppression on this elevation is not required.

3 -

General Area Mezzanine Pre-Action Systems - Below Operating Floor (two systems required - North and South area systems). These systems also supply the turbine bearing protection.

4 -

No Required Systems on this elevation. Non-Required system is the Turbine Storage Building Wet Pipe Sprinkler system.

5 -

Transformer suppression system(s) required by PMG.

6 -

For fire zones provided with more than one automatic suppression system, the table will indicate via a footnote if there are only certain systems being credited as required. If there is no notation in this column for a zone where the suppression is noted as required, all suppression systems in that zone are considered as "required" systems.

7 - This information is draft only. Review by the PMG Expert Panel is still in process System Actuated by Thermal Detectors Page 82 - HNP NFPA 805 Transition Report - Supplement 3b.docx

Progress Energy HNIP NFPA 805 Transition Report Progress Energy HNP NFPA 805 Transition Report Table 4-8-2 Required Automatic Fire Detection Systems For Deterministic Compliance (NFPA 805 § 4.2.3)

For Performance Based Compliance

-o

_(NFPA 805 § 4.2.4) 0 CL A

C 0

By Credit Taken in Change FSAR E '-.

R W

Evaluation for:

FSA

.2 r.,*

co

=

FIEFIRE

=: 4.

-0 o

FIRE ZONE Area Description U

o o

-0

.in

=.*

0-oz*

AREA 0

y o

s.r 0 M

'*LU,,

So cc E._

20

-u)

C.

0>

E 0

Other LuJ >

L U

(

E.

S Recovery Incipient CE u

0.

Action Detection

0) 0 Item EEEE - EC-50804-3 - Supports 3-hour 12-A-5 RAB Units 1 And Yes EC-50804-3 barrier for two 12-A-BAL CHF 2 Balance of Plant Yes J,1)

No Yes Yes Attachment hatches in the area, No No No No No Areas B, ESR 99-ESR 99-00395 -

00395 Supports Pen Seal Deficiency.

RAB Units 1 And 12-A-BAL 12-A-5-DIH 2 Balance of Plant Yes Yes (I)

No Yes No N/A N/A No Yes No No No Areas 12-A RAB Units 1 And 12-A-BAL CHF1 2 Balance of Plant Yes No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No Areas A

12-A RAB Units 1 And 12-A-BAL 2 Balance of Plant Yes No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No Areas RAB Units 1 And 12-A-BAL 12-A-7-HV 2 Balance of Plant Yes Yes (I)

No Yes No N/A N/A No No No No No Areas 1A -A RAB Units 1 And 12-A-BAL 2 Balance of Plant No No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No Areas 12-A-CR 12-A Control Room, Yes Yes No Yes No N/A N/A Yes No Yes Yes No CR1 RAB (lAS) 12-A-CR 12-A Control Room, Yes Yes No Yes No N/A N/A Yes No Yes Yes No RT1 RAB (RAS)

Page 83 - HNP NFPA 805 Transition Report - Supplement 3b.docx

Progress Energy HNP NFPA 805 Transition Report Progress Energy HNP NFPA 805 Transition Report Table 4-8-2 Required Automatic Fire Detection Systems Q

For Deterministic Compliance (NFPA 805 § 4.2.3)

For Performance Based Compliance 0

(NFPA 805 § 4.2.4)

.,. c.- cr E21:

By Credit Taken in Change FSAR w-Evaluation for:

FIE FIRE 2X FIRE ZONE Area Description

.2

>,.-0 ZONE 0

L~

AREA2 2

E Other 4.1~

LU E

Lu

.O.

>RFBS Recovery Incipient CE (DU WU C10..

RSC U L* *.

I E

Action Detection Item ESR 99-00395 -

12-A-12-A Control Room Yes ESR 99-ER9-09 12-A 1

Conrl Yes Yes No Yes Yes ESR Supports Pen Seal Yes No Yes Yes No CRC1 ARPI1 Complex (lAS) 00395 Dfcec Deficiency 12-A-12-A-6-CR Control Room Yes Yes No Yes No N/A N/A Yes No Yes No No CRC1 Complex (lAS) 12-A-12-A Control Room Yes 1RCA P2C-6 Compl Yes No Yes No N/A N/A Yes No Yes Yes No CRCl PICR1 Complex (I,AS)I 12-A-12-A Control Room Yes Yes (I)

No Yes No N/A N/A Yes No Yes No No CRC1 RCCl Complex

Heating, 12-A-HVIR 12-A Ventilating, and Yes Yes (1)

No Yes No N/A N/A No No Yes No No HV7 Instrument Repairs, RAB

Heating, 12-A-HVIR 12-A-6-IRR Ventilating, and Instrument Yes Yes (I)

No No No N/A N/A No No Yes No No Repairs, RAB 12 12 Emergency Service Water Yes No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No ESWPA ESWPA PmpA______________

Pump 1A 12 12 Emergency Service Water Yes No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No ESWPB ESWPB Pm B____

Pump 11B 12-0-TA 12-0-TA Diesel Fuel Oil No No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No Storage Tank A 12-0-TB 12-0-TB Diesel Fuel Oil No No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No Storage Tank B Page 84 - HNP NFPA 805 Transition Report - Supplement 3b.docx

Progress Energy HNP NFPA 805 Transition Report Table 4-8-2 Required Automatic Fire Detection Systems 0

For Deterministic Compliance (NFPA 805 § 4.2.3)

For Performance Based Compliance (NFPA 805 § 4.2.4)

. IE

1 t*

By Credit Taken in Change FSAR FIRE

-a

't 0

Evaluation for:

FIRE Area Description 0

>D o

Pz, ZONE z

AREA ZON M

UL te Io w

E LU o

O

(* >

U.

Other Lu >

LU E RB Recovery Incipient

,U a'

L.

U ERFBS CE JLU LU U

w Action Detection Item cn(0)

LU Ie 1-A-ACP 1-A-ACP Auxiliary Control Yes Yes No No No N/A N/A Yes No Yes Yes No Panel Room (lAS) 1-A-BAL-A 1-A-3-TA RAB - EL 231 No No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No 1-A-BAL-A 1-A-4-TA RAB - EL 231 No No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No 1-A-BAL-A 1-A-1-FD RAB - EL 190 Yes Yes Yes Yes No N/A N/A Yes No Yes No No Yes 1-A-BAL-A 1-A-1-PA RAB - EL 190 Yes Yes Yes No N/A N/A No No No No No 1-A-BAL-A 1-A-2-MP RAB - EL 216 Yes Yes Yes Yes No N/A N/A No No Yes No No (TI)

J, 1-A-BAL-A 1-A-2-PT RAB - EL 216 No No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No 1-A-BAL-A 1-A RAB - EL 236-261 No No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No RHXA Yes 1-A-BAL-A 1-A-3-COR RAB - EL 236 Yes Yes Yes No N/A N/A No Yes No No No (T)

Yes Supports HVAC 1-A-BAL-A 1-A-3-MP RAB - EL 236 Yes Yes Yes Yes EC 60257 duct w/o fire No Yes No No No (T) damper Yes Supports HVAC 1-A-BAL-A 1-A-3-(T RAB - EL 236 Yes Yes Yes Yes EC 60257 duct w/o fire No Yes Yes No No (TI)_

_damper Yes 1-A-BAL-A 1-A-1-ED RAB - EL 190 Yes Yes Yes No N/A N/A Yes No Yes No No Yes i-A-BAL-A 1-A-i-PB RAB - EL 190 Yes Yes Yes No N/A N/A No No Yes No No 1 -A R B -E 3

1-A-BAL-A RAB - EL 236-261 No No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No RHXB Page 85 - HNP NFPA 805 Transition Report - Supplement 3b.docx

Progress Energy HNP NFIPA 805 Transition Report Progress Energy HNP NFPA 805 Transition Report Table 4-8-2 Required Automatic Fire Detection Systems wa For Deterministic Compliance (NFPA 805 § 4.2.3)

For Performance Based Compliance Fn i(NFPA 805 § 4.2.4) 20 By Credit Taken in Change FSAR FIRE A

0.

Evaluation for:

FIRE 4'

4

.2 0-W0 AREA ZONE Area Description o>

.=

-.1.2-0 ARA-

.)

tr C.I-CL 0

Efa.

.U'U E

U Other LU U

ERFBS Recovery Incipient C

< ) 0 UU 0..

ERFB Action Detection 0

>%Item 1 -A Yes ESR 99 ESR 99-00395 -

1-A-BAL-A COMB RAB - EL 236 Yes JI)

Yes Yes Yes 00395 Supports Pen Seal Yes Yes Yes No No Deficiency 1-A Yes ESR 99-ESR 99-00395 -

1-A-BAL-A RAB - EL 236 Yes Yes Yes Yes Supports Pen Seal No Yes Yes No No COME R(TI) 00395 Deficiency 1-A Yes ESR 99-ESR 99-00395 -

1-A-BAL-A COMI RAB - EL 236 Yes JI)

Yes Yes Yes 00395 Supports Pen Seal No No Yes No No Deficiency 1-A Yes ESR 99-ESR 99-00395 -

1-A-BAL-A CHFA RAB - EL 261 Yes JI)

Yes Yes Yes 00395 Supports Pen Seal Yes No Yes No No Deficiency 1-A Yes 1-A-BAL-A RAB - EL 261 Yes Yes Yes No N/A N/A No No Yes No No CHFB JI) 1-A-BAL-A 1-A RAB - EL 261 No No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No CHFC 1-A-BAL-A 1-A RAB - EL 261 Yes Yes Yes Yes No N/A N/A Yes No Yes No No COMI (T,I)

EC 52769, 1-A-BAL-B 1-A RAB - EL 261 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes EC 63858 Supports Pen Seal Yes Yes Yes No No CHLR (TI) and ESR Deficiencies 99-00395 Yes ESR 99-ESR 99-00395 -

1-A-BAL-B 1-A-4-COR RAB - EL 261 Yes Yes Yes Yes Supports Pen Seal No Yes Yes No No I(I)

I I

I00395 Deficiency 1-A Yes ESR 99-ESR 99-00395 -

1-A-BAL-B RAB - EL 261 Yes Yes Yes Yes Supports Pen Seal No Yes Yes No No 1-A-BAL-B COMB RAB - EL 261 Yes (TI)

Yes Yes Yes 00395 Deficiency Page 86 - HNP NFPA 805 Transition Report - Supplement 3b.docx

Progress Energy HNP NFPA 805 Transition Report Table 4-8-2 Required Automatic Fire Detection Systems For Deterministic Compliance (NFPA 805 § 4.2.3)

For Performance Based Compliance F or (NFPA 805 § 4.2.4)

.2.

0 E

By Credit Taken in Change

~ 0 4)

FIRE IRw U

O C

Evaluation for:

FIR FIRE Area Description 0

J O0 o Uo AREA M

0-Cr E.M w--

r-z AO E

)

)

w w

Other

.(*.

>IU J

E.

S Recovery Incipient CE 0

C mw.

a.

Action Detection Item 1-A Yes ESR 99-ESR 99-00395 -

1-A-BAL-B COME RAB - EL 261 Yes (T,I)

Yes Yes Yes 00395 Supports Pen Seal No Yes Yes No No COME (T) 00395Deficiency___

RAB Unit 1 -

Yes 1-A-BAL-C 1-A-5-HVB Yes No Yes No N/A N/A No Yes Yes No No Analysis Area C (l) 1 1-A-BAL-D 1-A RAB Unit 1, Yes No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No COMC Analysis Area D 1 -A-BAL-D 1-A RAB Unit 1, No No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No COMC Analysis Area D N

N N

1 -A-BAL-D 1-A RAB Unit 1, Yes No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No COMA Analysis Area D Y

1-A-BAL-D 1-A RAB Unit 1, Yes No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No COMA Analysis Area D EEEE - EC 52769 R22 Issue - This EC credits the RAB Unit 1 -

Yes EC 52769 detection system in 1-A-BAL-E 1-A-BAL-E Yes No No Yes 1-A-BAL-E for Yes Yes No No No Analysis Area Ys (I)

N No Ys R22 jsiiaino justification of a penetration seal in the barrier to FA 1-A-BAL-B2.

RAB Unit 1 -

1-A-BAL-F 1-A-BAL-F Anis A F

Yes No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No Analysis Area F 1-A-BAL-G 1-A-BAL-G RAB Unit 1 -

Yes Yes No Yes Yes EC-60257 Supports HVAC No No No No No Analysis Area G (I)

Pen w/o damper 1-A-BAL-H 1-A-BAL-H RAB Unit 1 -

Yes Yes No No Yes EC-60257 Supports HVAC No No No No No Analysis Area H (T,

N

)

Pen w/o damper Page 87 - HNP NFPA 805 Transition Report - Supplement 3b.docx

Progiress Enerqy HNP NFPA 805 Transition Report Table 4-8-2 Required Automatic Fire Detection Systems For Deterministic Compliance (NFPA 805 § 4.2.3)

For Performance Based Compliance o

(NFPA 805 § 4.2.4) 0 a

vlutoLCag r E By Credit Taken in Change FSAR FIRE Evaluation for:

FIRE Area Description 0

n.

.z AREA

~2 r-a LOE>C 0

O AREA~

~

(L o

ý

.2" E.*

20

=

n.-

a.)

>u w

wz

=

x ui JuJ

(.9 Other w >

U cc Recovery Incipient o 0

.u ERFBS CE a) ca Cc ULJ LU a.>

Action Detection Item 1-A itemi 1-e 1-A-BAL-J 1-A RAB Unit 1 -

Yes Yes No Yes No N/A N/A No No Yes No No BATN Analysis Area J (I_)_1_1 RAB Unit 1 -

1-A-BAL-J 1-A-5-CEH Anis A No No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No Analysis Area J I

1-A-BAL-J 1-A-5-HV3 RABUnit1-No No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No Analysis Area J 1-A-BAL-J 1-A-5-HVA RAB Unit 1 -

Yes Yes No Yes No N/A N/A No Yes Yes No No Analysis Area J

()

1-A-BAL-K 1-A-46-ST RABUnit1-No No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No Analysis Area K Yes 1-A-BATA 1-A-BATA Battery Room A Yes Yes No No No N/A N/A Yes No Yes No No 1-A-BATB 1-A-BATB Battery Room B Yes Yes No No No N/A N/A Yes No No No No 1-A-CSRA 1-A-5-PICA Cable Spreading Yes Yes No No No N/A N/A No No Yes No No Room A (1)

Cable Spreading Y

Yes ESR 99-ESR 99-00395 -

1-A-CSRA 1-A-CSRA Cabl A

Yes (T,I,AS)

No No Yes ESR Supports Pen Seal Yes Yes Yes Yes No

)00395 Deficiency.

1-A-CSRB 1-A-5-PICB Cable Spreading Yes Yes No No No N/A N/A No No Yes No No Room B (I)

B Cable Spreading Y

Yes NESR 99-ESR 99-00395 -

1-A-CSRB 1-A-CSRB Room B Y

Ye(TIAS)

No Yes 00395 Supports Pen Seal Yes Yes Yes Yes No Room___________B__ (I) oY 00395_

Deficiency.

Electrical Yes ESR 99 ESR 99-00395 -

1-A-EPA 1-A-EPA Penetration Area Yes No No Yes Supports Pen Seal Yes Yes Yes No No A

(T) 00395 Deficiency.

I I

Page 88 - HNP NFPA 805 Transition Report - Supplement 3b.docx

Prowess Enerqy HNIP NFPA 805 Transition Report Progress Energy HNP NFPA 805 Transition Report Table 4-8-2 Required Automatic Fire Detection Systems For Deterministic Compliance (NFPA 805 § 4.2.3)

For Performance Based Compliance

__._(NFPA 805 § 4.2.4) r E C

By CreditTakenin Change FSAR FIRE w

0

.0 Evaluation for:

FIRE Area Description Co 0

.j.

2 ARA ZONE 0L 0

A R EA 0= r-,

oz=

E

.2 E

uF.

w 2 Z

w9e te 13 LE >

w

a.

LU Recovery Incipient OE 0U w

~

w ERFBS CE

4) 0, m

u.1 LU Action Detection Item C

emIe Electrical Yes 1-A-EPB 1-A-EPB Penetration Area Yes No No No N/A N/A No Yes Yes No No B

(T) 1-A-1-A-Switchgear Room Yes Yes No Yes No N/A N/A Yes No Yes Yes No SWGRA SWGRA A

(IAS) 1-A-1-A-Switchgear Room Yes ESR 99-ESR 99-00395 -

SWGRB SWGRB B

(lAS)

No Yes Yes 00395 Supports Pen Seal Yes Yes Yes Yes No Deficiency.

Containment Yes2 1-C 1-C-1-BAL Building, All Yes Yes Yes No N/A N/A No No Yes No No Levels (TI) 1-C Containment Yes 1-C Yes Yes Yes No N/A N/A No No Yes No No CHFA Building, El 221' (T) 1-C 1-C Containment Yes Yes3 Yes Yes No N/A N/A No No Yes No No CHFB Building, El 221' (T)

Containment 1-C RCP-1A Building, All Yes (T)

Yes Yes No N/A N/A No No Yes No No Levels I

(T)I 1-C-i-Containment 1C RCP-1 B Levelsg l

e (T)

Yes Yes No N/A N/A No No Yes No No 1-C Containment Yes 1-C Building, All Yes Yes Yes No N/A N/A No No Yes No No RCP-1C Levels (T) 1-C 1-C-3-EPA Containment Yes Yes Yes Yes No N/A N/A No No Yes No No Building, El 261' (TI) 1-C 1-C-3-EPB Containment Yes Yes Yes Yes No N/A N/A No No Yes No No I

Building, El 261' (TI) 1 1

Page 89 - HNP NFPA 805 Transition Report - Supplement 3b.docx

Progress Energy HNP NFPA 805 Transition Report Progress Energy HNP NFPA 805 Transition Report Table 4-8-2 Required Automatic Fire Detection Systems 0

For Deterministic Compliance (NFPA 805 § 4.2.3)

For Performance Based Compliance

4.

(NFPA 805 § 4.2.4) o 1By Credit Taken in Change FSA FIR 0-FSAR FR 0

Evaluation for:

t --

wo U)

C P

FIRE M >,

QUU)C FIRE Area Description

>.wo.

ZONE 0

0 ARE 0

r-)

C L

E E 4)

W-9 M*

Other 0

U a LU a

ERFBS Recovery Incipient CE

<C W LU a-Action Detection Item 1-D Diesel Generator Yes ESR 99-ESR 99-00395 -

1-D-DGA DGA-ASU lA Yes (T)

No No Yes 00395 Supports Pen Seal No No No No No Deficiency.

1-D-DGA 1-D Diesel Generator Yes No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No DGA-ER 1A 1-D-DGA 1-D Diesel Generator Yes Yes No No No N/A N/A Yes No No No No DGA-RM 1A (m) 1-D-DGA 1-D Diesel Generator Yes No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No DGA-HVD 1A 1-D-DGA 1-D Diesel Generator Yes No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No DGA-ES 1A I

1-D-DGA 1-D Diesel Generator Yes No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No DGA-HVR 1A 1-D Diesel Generator Yes ESR 99-ESR 99-00395 -

1-D-DGB DGB-ASU elB Yes 0r Yes 0395 Supports Pen Seal No No No No No 1-D-DB DGBASU 1 Yes (T)

No No Yes 039Deieny Deficiency.

1-D-DGB 1-D Diesel Generator Yes No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No DGB-ER 1B 1-D-DGB 1-D Diesel Generator Yes Yes4 No No No N/A N/A Yes No No No No DGB-RM 1B (T) 1-D-DGB 1-D Diesel Generator Yes No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No DGB-HVD 1B 1-D-DGB 1-D Diesel Generator Yes No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No DG13-ES l BGIrI 1-D-DGB 1-D Diesel Generator Yes No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No DGB-HVR 1B Diesel Generator Yes ESR 99 ESR 99-00395 -

1-D-DTA 1-D-DTA Fuel Oil Day Tank Yes No No Yes Supports Pen Seal No No No No No I

A Enclosure (T) 00395 Deficiency.

Page 90 - HNP NFPA 805 Transition Report - Supplement 3b.docx

Progress Energy HNP NFPA 805 Transition Report Table 4-8-2 Required Automatic Fire Detection Systems For Deterministic Compliance (NFPA 805 § 4.2.3)

For Performance Based Compliance r-(NFPA 805 § 4.2.4) 0 M-=

By Credit Taken in Change FSAR F

41 >,.-

4 x

0 Evaluation for:

FIRE x

u-E

.c o

FIRE Area Description 0

0 AREA.ZONE

.(9 Other Eo CL LU0E-.4)L te 0

E (iM aL(

Recovery Incipient J 0 Lu >

LU U1 ERFBS CE u LUu.I ERFBS Action Detection Diesel Generator Yes ESR 99 ESR 99-00395 -

1-D-DTB 1-D-DTB Fuel Oil Day Tank Yes No No Yes Supports Pen Seal No No No No No B Enclosure (T) 00395 Deficiency.

1-G 1-G-240 Turbine Generator Yes Yes No No No N/A N/A No No Yes No No Building (I) 1-G 1-G-261 Turbine Generator Yes Yes No Yes No N/A N/A Yes No Yes No No Building (T,I1 1-G 1-G-286 Turbine Generator Yes Yes No Yes No N/A N/A Yes No Yes No No Building JI) 1-G 1-G-314 Turbine Generator No No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No Building 1-0-PA 1-O-PA Diesel Oil Pump Yes No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No Room A I

I I

1-0-PB 1-0-PB Diesel Oil Pump Yes No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No Room B Fuel Handling 5-F-BAL 5-F-1-TK Building Balance No No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No of Areas 5-F Fuel Handling 5-F-BAL CLP Building Balance No No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No of Areas 5-F Fuel Handling 5-F-BAL FTCl Building Balance No No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No of Areas L 5-F Fuel Handling 5-F-BAL FTC2 Building Balance No No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No of Areas Page 91 - HNP NFPA 805 Transition Report - Supplement 3b.docx

Progress Energy HNP NFPA 805 Transition Report Progress Energy HNP NFPA 805 Transition Report Table 4-8-2 Required Automatic Fire Detection Systems For Deterministic Compliance (NFPA 805 § 4.2.3)

For Performance Based Compliance S*0 (NFPA 805 § 4.2.4)

M By Credit Taken in Change (S R FI E 0-0 C.

Evaluation for:

FSAR

)4 c

FIRE I13,J 0

LIJa)

FIRE ZONE

~M >,.-.

2 ARE Area Description r'

0 o

AREA o

r

. r-

"L E

> 0 (D

l U IL l

.9 M O th er E

L uJ.

Recovery Incipient OE

.a ERFBS Action Detection LU Item 5-F Fuel Handling 5-F-BAL NFP1 Building Balance No No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No of Areas 5-F Fuel Handling 5-F-BAL NFP2 Building Balance No No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No of Areas L 5-F Fuel Handling 5-F-BAL SFP1 Building Balance No No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No of Areas 5-F Fuel Handling 5-F-BAL SFP2 Building Balance No No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No of Areas Fuel Handling 5-F-BAL 5-F-2-DEC Building Balance No No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No of Areas Fuel Handling 5-F-BAL 5-F-3-CHG Building Balance No No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No of Areas Fuel Handling 5-F-BAL 5-F-3-DE Building Balance No No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No of Areas Fuel Handling 5-F-BAL 5-F-3-DEC Building Balance No No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No of Areas Fuel Handling 5-F-BAL 5-F-3-HV Building Balance No No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No of Areas 5-F Fuel Handling 5-F-BAL MFTC Building Balance No No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No of Areas Page 92 - HNP NFPA 805 Transition Report - Supplement 3b.docx

Progress Energy HNIP NFPA 805 Transition Report Prars Enrv HPNP 0

rniinRp Table 4-8-2 Required Automatic Fire Detection Systems For Deterministic Compliance (NFPA 805 § 4.2.3)

For Performance Based Compliance

. "(NFPA 805 § 4.2.4)

A.)

o1:

By Credit Taken in Change 4)c'.

r E

~

0 FSAR FR 4

Evaluation for:

FIRE

0.

o

)

FIRE Area Description o.;

m

.2o

.r W

o)

ARA ZONE

>2~~

CU

0.

J 0

EO

.r2 EJOU-wOte AREA 0

M 0 M z

o0

0.

E>

2 w

w x=

u Il=U 3 -Other LU ERFBS Recovery Incipient uJ >U UJU ERFBS C

LU LU 1

W C.

Action Detection IE CL W

Uitem Fuel Handling 5-F-BAL 5-F-3-NF Building Balance No No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No of Areas Fuel Handling 5-F-BAL 5-F-3-SC Building Balance No No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No of Areas Fuel Handling 5-F-BAL 5-F-3-STR Building Balance No No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No of Areas Fuel Handling 5-F-BAL 5-F-4-BAL Building Balance No No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No of Areas Fuel Handling 5-F-CHF 5-F Building Yes No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No CHFA Emergency Exhaust Fuel Handling 5-F-CHF 5-F Building Yes No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No CHFB Emergency Exhaust Fuel Handling 5-F-CHF 5-F-3-CHF-Building Yes No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No BAL Emergency Exhaust Fuel Handling EC-50804-3 Support 3-hour 5-F-CHF 5-F Building Yes Yes No No Yes Attachment barrier for two No No No No No DMNZ1 Emergency (I)

B hatches in the area Exhaust Page 93 - HNP NFPA. 805 Transition Report - Supplement 3b.docx

Progress Energy HNP NFPA 805 Transition Report Progress Energy HNP NFPA 805 Transition Report Table 4-8-2 Required Automatic Fire Detection Systems 0

For Deterministic Compliance (NFPA 805 § 4.2.3)

For Performance Based Compliance 4)~

(NFPA 805 § 4.2.4)

o FS AR0 By Credit Taken in Change FSAR FIRE 0et-0 0

a.

Evaluation for:

IREA ZONE A) 2

..2 ARA

.*.2 U 0 U

LU Oe FIREUu ERFBS Action Detection Item o >,

r-CL M

>I 5-Fe3-Buiding YsEC-50804-3 Support 3-hour 5-F-CHF 5F3Bulig YsYes No No Yes Attachment barrier for two No No No No No DMNZ2 Emergency (I)

B hatches in the area, Exhaust FuelHandingSupport 3-hour 5-F-FPP 5-F-2-FPC Building Fuel Pool Yes Ys No Yes Yes EC 48007 brirfr No No No No No Heat Exchangers (T) floor/ceiling hatches in the area, 5-F-2 Fuel Handling 5-F-FPP FP1 Building Fuel Pool Yes No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No PV Heat Exchangers Fuel Handling 5-F-FPP F

Building Fuel Pool Yes No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No Heat Exchangerst Diesel Fuel Oil 5-O-BAL 5-O-BAL Storage Area Yes No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No Balance Auxiliary Reservoir 5-S-BAL 5-S-BAL Sreig No No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No 5-F FureleHnding Structure__________________

5-W-BAL 1-A-2-COR Waste Processing No No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No Building 5-W-BAL 5-W-1 -C1 Waste Processing Yes No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No Building 5-W-BAL 5-W Waste Processing Yes No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No FDTK Building 5-W-BAL 5-W Waste Processing Yes No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No AHCHTK Building Page 94 - HNP NFPA 805 Transition Report - Supplement 3b.docx

Progress Energy HNIP NFPA 805 Transition Report Proqress Enerqv HNP NFPA 805 Transition Report Table 4-8-2 Required Automatic Fire Detection Systems For Deterministic Compliance (NFPA 805 § 4.2.3)

For Performance Based Compliance S

0

_.(NFPA 805 § 4.2.4) oC' E

r-By Credit Taken in Change 0

FSAR FIRE 0

C 0

0 Evaluation for:

FIRE Area Description 2-..

U.

z AREA ZON iz.,,

0 o2 C.

M E.-F, C

<:* o4) cc mU.uj

u.

I1u LI.

M Other I1 1

l C.

Recovery Incipient OE M

u.

ERFBS Action Detection Item 5-W-BAL 5-W Waste Processing Yes No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No LCHTK Building 5-W-BAL 5-W-1-SW Waste Processing Yes No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No Building 5-W-BAL 5-W-1-TK Waste Processing No No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No Building 5-W-BAL 5-W-1-TKS Waste Processing Yes No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No Building 5-W-BAL 5-W-1-VG Waste Processing Yes No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No 2

Building 5-W-BAL 5-W-1-VG-Waste Processing Yes No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No 1

Building 5-W-BAL 5-W Waste Processing Yes No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No WHTK1 Building 5-W-BAL 5-W Waste Processing Yes No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No WHTK2 Building 5-W-BAL 5-W Waste Processing Yes No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No CMPT Building 5-W-BAL 5-W Waste Processing Yes No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No COND Building 5-W-BAL 5-W-2-CR Waste Processing Yes No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No Building 5-W-BAL 5-W Waste Processing No No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No DMNZ Building 5-W-BAL 5-W Waste Processing Yes No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No EVAP Building 5-W-BAL 5-W-2-HTR Waste Processing Yes No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No Building Page 95 - HNP NFPA 805 Transition Report - Supplement 3b.docx

Propiress Enerqy HNP NFPA 805 Transition Report Table 4-8-2 Required Automatic Fire Detection Systems SFor Deterministic Compliance (NFPA 805 § 4.2.3)

For Performance Based Compliance 0

F)i (NFPA 805 § 4.2.4)

O.

02 By Credit Taken in Change F

Evaluation for:

FSAR FIRE 2x FIRE Q

a x

FIRE Area Description Z

ARA ZONE U)

I 0

ARE r-C.- M

z 7@.-

0 0

E X

> cc

,O, uJ 4J Ll "Recovery Incipient O E cc W.

LU LU L

ERFBS CE L

Action Detection 5-W-BAL 5-W Waste Processing Yes No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No HVAC Building 5-W-BAL 5-W Waste Processing Yes No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No LCHTK-1 Building 5-W-BAL 5-W Waste Processing Yes No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No LCHTK2 Building 5-W-BAL 5-W Waste Processing Yes No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No LHSTK Building 5-W-BAL 5-W Waste Processing Yes No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No RPIR Building 5-W-BAL 5-W Waste Processing Yes No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No TKS1 Building 5-W-BAL 5-W Waste Processing Yes No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No TKS2 Building 5-W-BAL 5-W Waste Processing Yes No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No TLHSTK Building 5-W-BAL 5-W Waste Processing Yes No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No CWHE1 Building 5-W-BAL 5-W Waste Processing Yes No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No CWHE-2 Building I

5-W-BAL 5-W Waste Processing Yes Yes No No No N/A N/A Yes No No No No CWP Building 1_(I) 1_1 5-W-BAL 5-W Waste Processing Yes Yes No Yes No N/A N/A No No No No No DRM Building 1

(I) 5-W-BAL 5-W-34-IC Waste Processing Yes No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No Building 5-W-BAL 5-W Waste Processing No No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No MLR Building Page 96 - HNP NFPA 805 Transition Report - Supplement 3b.docx

Progress Energy HNP NFPA 805 Transition Report Progress Energy HNP NFPA 805 Transition Report Table 4-8-2 Required Automatic Fire Detection Systems S

For Deterministic Compliance (NFPA 805 § 4.2.3)

For Performance Based Compliance F

D.

Compliance (NFPA 805 § 4.2.4) oE

~

w By Credit Taken in Change FSAR FIR 0

0

.0 )

a.

Evaluation for:

13 W

0,_

-o FIRE Oc o

)

0 0E FIRE ZONE Area Description 0

.2 M

ZONE Lg >

0 AREA N

0o z

zIJW CL 0 c-LU.-

cUc L-Lu Other w**Q UJ >

UJ UJ a.U LUJ LU ER IL.

Recovery Incipient CE W o,

)0 m

>LU

'U a-Action Detection Item 5-W-BAL 5-W-3-STR Waste Processing Yes No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No Building 5-W-BAL 5-W Waste Processing Yes No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No DRM Building 5-W-BAL 5-W-4-HL Waste Processing No No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No Building 5-W-BAL 5-W-4-LAL Waste Processing No No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No Building 5-W-BAL 5-W Waste Processing Yes No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No SWG1 Building 5-W-BAL 5-W4-Waste Processing Yes No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No SWG2 Building 5-W-BAL 5-W Waste Processing Yes No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No WRK Building 5-W-BAL 5-W-5-CHF Waste Processing Yes No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No Building 5-W-BAL 5-W-5-FA Waste Processing No No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No Building 5-W-BAL 5-W-5-FAN Waste Processing Yes No.

No No No N/A N/A No No No No No Building 5-W-BAL 5-W-5-HV Waste Processing Yes No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No Building 5-W-BAL 5-W-5-SLD Waste Processing Yes No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No Building 5-W-BAL 5-W-5-CHL Waste Processing Yes No No No No N/A N/A No No No No No Building FPYARD FPYARD Outside Yard Yes Yes8 No No No N/A N/A Yes No No No No I I I

~ ~(T)

II II Page 97 - HNP NFPA 805 Transition Report - Supplement 3b.docx

Proqress Enerqy HINIP NFPA 805 Transition Report Footnotes:

1 -

Legend for Detection System Types Required in a Fire Zone:

T=Thermal, I=lonization, AS=Air Sampling (Incipient), UV=Ultra-Violet Flame Detection 2-Detection Zone 1-120 for 1-C-1 -BAL General Area. Detection Zone 1-7A for Elevator Equipment Room Ionization detection required. Thermal detection required to support the required suppression system actuation. This includes Sub-Zone 1-C-1-CFC which is Detection Zone 1-5A.

3-Detection Zones 1-5 & 1-5B. Thermal detection required to support the suppression system actuation. This includes Sub-Zone 1-C-1-PRZR (Detection Zone 1-5B).

4-Only Thermal detection required in this zone for PMG.

5-Detection Zones 1-58, 1 Ionization Detection only for - Cable Vault and Cable Area (General Floor Area outside cable vault). No required suppression systems on this elevation so no thermal detection required for suppression system actuation.

6-Detection Zone 1-67 for Ionization Detection required for Switchgear Room. Thermal Detection required for actuation of all required suppression systems (Detection Zone 1-64 for Turbine L.O. System), (Detection Zone 1-65 for Condensate Booster Pumps), (Detection Zone 1-66 for Steam Generator Feed Pumps).

7-Detection Zone 1 for Ionization Detection required for the Electrical Room. Thermal Detection required for actuation of all required suppression systems (Detection Zone 1-71 for Mezzanine Floor South), Detection Zone 1-72 for Mezzanine Floor North), (Detection Zones 1-69-1 & 2 for Turbine Bearing South & North).

8-Thermal Detection associated with Transformer suppression system(s) required by PMG.

9 -

This information is draft only. Review by the PMG Expert Panel is still in process Page 98 - HNP NFPA 805 Transition Report - Supplement 3b.docx

v t e Letter Sequence Request
TAC:MD8807, (Approved, Closed)
Initiation Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request Acceptance, Acceptance Supplement Administration Meeting, Meeting, Meeting, Meeting, Meeting, Meeting, Meeting, Meeting Questions 6 August 2009 14 January 2010 Answers 13 August 2009 28 August 2009 9 October 2009 Results Approval, Approval, Approval, Approval Other: ML082420265, ML090290327, ML091600281, ML101750604
MONTHYEAR2008-07-11 [Table View]

HNP-10-040, Response to 3rd Round of RAI License Amendment Request to Adopt National Fire Protection Association Standard 805, Performance-Based Standard for Fire Protection for Light Water Reactor Generating Plants

Text

References:

Enclosures:

Response

Response

Response

Navigation menu

HNP-10-040, Response to 3rd Round of RAI License Amendment Request to Adopt National Fire Protection Association Standard 805, Performance-Based Standard for Fire Protection for Light Water Reactor Generating Plants

Text

References:

Enclosures:

Response

Response

Response

Navigation menu

Search