Text

TIC-1463, Rev. 0, Quad Cities 2 Power Ascension Test Procedure.
	ML070290616
Person / Time
Site:	Quad Cities
Issue date:	04/18/2006
From:	; Exelon Nuclear
To:	; Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
	Download: ML070290616 (71)
	v • d • e

TIC-i 463 Revision 0 Page 1 of 71 Nuclear Level 1 - Continuous Use Quad Ci'ti~es Unit 2 Power Ascensuion Test Procedure for the Acoustic S'ide Branch (ASB)

Insaltio Modified 4/1 8.2006

TIC-i 463 Revision 0 Page 2 of 71

1. ~ ~ TAL OBETVADDSUSONTENTS............... PUPOE

11. PURPOSE, BETVADDSUSO .......................................................................... 4 1.21. PROBJECTIVES................................................................................................... 4 1.3. DBECIVcESo ............................................................................................ 5.

2 .. MAEIALUSSAND SPECIAL...................EQUIPMENT ....................................................... 7.

3. RAESPNIBLITI SES............. ............................................................ 7 3.1 UEPNSIBIUPER IESR............................................................................................ 7 3.2. UNTSBUTESTVCOORDINATOR...................................................................................... 7 3.3. PANTETMANAGRDINATOR..................................................................................8.

3.4. DLANTA TAKERORGERIFCTO PERSON................................................................................ 8 34.PRERQUISTAES, PRVERFCAUTIONSERAND LIMITATIONS...............................................9..

4.. PREREQUISITES,............ LMITTINS...................................................... 9 4.2. PRECAQUTIOSITS.............................................................................................13..

4.3. LIMITAUTIONS................................................................................................ 13 5 ..PEFOMIATINCE ACCEPTANCE.......................CRITERIA................................................ 13 5.1 GEER RMAL.......................... .......................................................... 16 5.2. EPU VIBRATION MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA....................... 17 5.3. MAIN STEAM LINE STRAIN GAGE INSTRUMENTATION ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA.................... 17 5.4. INDIVIDUAL EQUIPMENT VIBRATION MONITORING ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA....................... 17 5.5. STEAM DRYER MOISTURE CARRYOVER ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA.................................... 17

6. MAIN BODY............................................................................................... 18 6.1. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS .................................................................................. 18 6.2. TEST CONDITION I BASELINE ........................................................................... 19 6.3. TEST CONDITION 2 17.5 % 517 MWT ................................................................. 19 6.4. TEST CONDITION 3 29.1 % 861 MWT ................................................................. 20 6.5. TEST CONDITION 4 34.9 % 1033 MWT................................................................ 20 6.6. TEST CONDITION 5 55.5 % 1640 MWT....................................................... 2)0 6.7. TEST CONDITION 6 59.9 % 1770 MWT................................................................ 21 6.8. TEST CONDITION 7 64.6 % 1910 MWT....................................................... 2?1 6.9. TEST CONDITION 8 70.0 % 2070 MWT ........................................................ 2 6.10. TEST CONDITION 9 75.2 % 2225 MWT............................................................_ .)

6.11. TEST CONDITION 10 80.0 % 2366 MWT ................................................... 2?3 6.12. TEST CONDITION I11 84.9 %2511 MWT............................................................ .23

6. 13. TEST CONDITION 122 87.1 % 2576 MW'i........................................................... 26 6.14. TESTCONDITION 13 89.3 %2640) MWT............................................... ............ ._)

6.1-5. TL-ST CONDITION 14 91.4 %2704 MW'i.............................................................2)7

TIC-i1463 Revision 0 Page 3 of 71 6.16. TEST CONDITION 15 93.6 % 2769 MWT.......................................................... 28 6.17. TEST CONDITION 16 94.7 % 2800 MWT............................................................ 28 6.18. TEST CONDITION 17 95.5 % 2823 MWT............................................................ 29 6.19. TEST CONDITION 18 97.2 % 2846 MWT (OR MAXIMUM ACHIEVABLE) ......................... 30

7. RETURN TO NORMAL................................................................................. 32 7.1. POST-TESTING POWER LEVEL .......................................................................... 32

8. REFERENCES ............................................................................................ 34 8.1. COMMITMENTFS..........................................................................................3j4 8.2. PROCEDURES............................................................................................. 34 8.3. OTHER ....................................................................................................... 34

9. ATTACHMENTS......................................................................................... 35 9.1. TESTICONDITION

SUMMARY

.............................................................................. 35 9.2. EPU VIBRATION MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION DATA SHEETl.................................... 35 9.3. MAIN STEAM LINE STRAIN GAGE INSTRUMENTATION DATA SHEET................................ 35 9.4. EQUIPMENT VIBRATION MONITORING UTILIZING HAND HELD M&TE ........................... 35 9.5. MINIMUM FUNCTIONAL INSTRUMENTATION............................................................ 35

10. LOGS..................................................................................................... 35 10.1. EVALUATION AND COMPLETION SIGNOFF............................................................ 35 10.2. EXCEPTIONS INDEX...................................................................................... 35

TIC-i 463 Revision 0 Page 4 of 71 1 PURPOSE, OBJECTIVE, AND DISCUSSION

11. Purpose The purpose of this Temporary Procedure is to provide step-by-step instructions in carrying out the Unit 2 Start-up Test Program to Extended Power Uprate (EPU) conditions, with the installation of Acoustic Side Branch (ASB) modification. The incremental power increase methodology is intended to ensure a careful, monitored approach to achieve the targeted higher power level. First and foremost in the performance of this test is the safety of the reactor and nuclear plant. The Temporary Procedure was written with this specifically in mind, providing the necessary criteria, instruction, oversight, and precautions to successfully execute the Acoustic Side Branch Modification Power Ascension Test Program.

1.2. Obiectives The objectives of this Temporary Procedure are to:

1. Formally document in one place that the plant physi Cal modifications and prerequisite testing have been satisfactorily completed and meet the established criteria to commence testing to 2511 MWt and beyond, with the ASB modification installed.

2. Demonstrate that the affected plant parameters and equipment performance remain within acceptable limits as power is increased to the maximum allowed power level, with the ASB modification installed.

3. Assure that regulatory commitments have been completed, and operability constraints have been resolved, as required to increase power above 2511 MWt.

4. Provide management oversight and control of the activities requiring completion to assure Quad Cities can safely operate at the full licensed power level, with the ASB modification installed.

5. Provide Shift Operations personnel clear instructions on testing and operational maneuvers to be performed as power levels are increased in a step-wise manner to assure safe operation during all testing activities.

6. Provide management reviews and approvals of the test data and their authorization to increase power level in a controlled step-wise manner.

7. Assure that procedures requiring revision to operate at uprated power conditions with the ASB modification installed have been revised as required and are available to plant personnel.

TIC-i 463 Revision 0 Page 5 of 71 1.3. Discussion 1.3.1. Quad Cities Station will install the ASB modification during 02R18, to address loads on the Steam Dryer and damage identified on the Electromatic Relief Valves during operation at EPU power levels. Strain gages will also be installed at selected locations on the Main Steam Lines inside of primary containment and inputted into Digital Data Recorders. The listing of which instrument sensors feed which Recorder channels is included as part of Attachment 9.3, "Main Steam Line Strain Gage Data Sheet." In addition, the recorder system that contains the strain gage information will also trigger a recorder that contains recording of Reactor Vessel Dome pressure from pressure transducers connected to reactor vessel level reference legs at racks 2-2202-5 and 2-2202-6.

1.3.2. Accelerometers are also installed on Unit 2 Main Steam Lines and Components inboard of the primary containment, as part of the EPU Main Steam Line Vibration Evaluation. These sensors feed into another Digital Data Recorder. The listing of which instrument sensors feed which Recorder channels is included as part of Attachment 9.2, "EPU Vibration Monitoring Data Sheet."

1.3.3. This Temporary Procedure provides for the monitoring, recording and evaluating of the Main Steam Line instrumentation inputted into the Data Recorders. During Test Conditions 9, 11, and following 18, data gathered from these sources at each test plateau will be compared against acceptance criteria before power ascension to the next plateau.

1.3.4. This Temporary Procedure provides for data collection to a pre-EPU power level of approximately 2511 MWt, and again during power ascension to short-term power operation at the licensed EPU power level of approximately 2957 MWt.

1.3.5. Power will be increased to the licensed EPU power level for short-term operation for the purpose of collecting and analyzing data when operating at EPU conditions.

Power will then be reduced to 2511 MWt (consistent with pre-EPU) if all Level 1 and Level 2 acceptance criteria are satisfied. If the acceptance. criteria are not satisfied, power will be reduced to the level where the criteria are satisfied. Long term operation at EPU power levels will not begin until an inspection of the Unit 1 dryer is completed in May 2006.

1.3.6. This Temporary Procedure is not intended to replace or substitute for operator power manipulations under QCGP 1-1, "Normal Unit Startup," or QCGP 3-1, "Reactor Power Operations." Operators will continue to use normal operating procedures to change power levels in the plant.

TIC-1 463 Revision 0 Page 6 of 71 1.3.7. This Temporary Procedure accomplishes power increases in controlled and well-monitored incremental steps. The times given below are approximate, and are not mandatory, provided the testing requirements of Section 4.3, "Limitations," are met for each test condition. The power levels also may be adjusted with permission from the Startup Test Coordinator. If all data recording and analysis is completed in a shorter period of time, then power ascension may resume in the shorter time.

During the holds at Test Conditions 9, 11, and 18, Main Steam Line (MSL) strain gage readings and accelerometers readings will be taken and compared to acceptance criteria before continuing the power increase. At all test conditions,*this data will be recorded for further analysis..

1. Test Condition 1 is at rated temperature and pressure conditions, prior to placing the unit on line in which the main steam line strain gages will have their bridge circuits balanced.

2. Test Condition 2, approximately 18% Core Thermal Power (CTP), is held for approximately 16 hours1.851852e-4 days 0.00444 hours 2.645503e-5 weeks 6.088e-6 months .

3. Test Condition 3, approximately 29% CTP, is held for 4 hours4.62963e-5 days 0.00111 hours 6.613757e-6 weeks 1.522e-6 months .

4. Test Condition 4, approximately 35% CTP, is held for 6 hours6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months .

5. Test Condition 5, approximately 56% CTP, is held for 6 hours6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months .

6. Starting at Test Condition 6 until Test Condition 9, approximately 75% CTP, each power level change -is an approximately 50 MWe increase (-4 to 5% CTP increase). The increase is over a one-hour period, with the actual power ascension occurring within the first 15 minutes of each period. Test data is then obtained during the remainder of each period. The data is not compared to acceptance criteria, but is recorded for further analysis.

7. Power is held steady at Test Condition 9 for 13 hours1.50463e-4 days 0.00361 hours 2.149471e-5 weeks 4.9465e-6 months while data is obtained and compared to acceptance criteria.

8. For Test Condition 10, approximately 80% CTP, the power level change is approximately a 5% CTP increase. The 5% increase is over a one-hour period, with the actual power ascension occurring within the first 15 minutes of the period. Test data is then obtained during the remainder of the period. The data is not compared to acceptance criteria, but is recorded for further analysis.

9. Power level is hel d at Test condition 11 (the pre-EPU CTP level of 2511 MWt),

for approximately 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months , during which time the results of a review of the data collected to this point are presented to Station Senior Management.

Authorization from Senior Management in the form of a Plant Operating Review Committee (PORC) is obtained prior to increasing power above 2511 MWt.

TIC-i 463 Revision 0 Page 7 of 71

10. For Test Condition 12 through Test Condition 18, Main Steam Line Accelerometer Instrument data and Main Steam Line Strain Gage data will be recorded. This data will be retrieved and subsequently analyzed.

11. Power level will be held at Test Condition 18, approximately 98% CIP (or maximum achievable), for approximately 4 to 8 hours9.259259e-5 days 0.00222 hours 1.322751e-5 weeks 3.044e-6 months , during which time plant data will be taken and a steam dryer moisture carryover sample will be taken.

Power will then be reduced to a level in which all acceptance criteria are satisfied, if necessary or to 2511 MWt.

1.3.8. For Test Conditions 9, 11, and 18, data and test results are reviewed and analyzed against pre-established limits and acceptance criteria. The results of the review are presented to the ASB TEST COORDINATOR where concurrence to proceed to the next higher power is requested. Prior to increasing power to each Test Condition above 2511 MWt, authorization from the Plant Manager or his designee is obtained.

1.3.9. The ASB TEST COORDINATOR, with concurrence by the SHIFT MANAGER, has the authority to NA steps based on plant conditions and shall note the justification in Log 10.2, "Exceptions Index."'

2. MATERIAL AND SPECIAL EQUIPMENT 2.2 Yokogawa DL750 Data Recorders 2.3 Portable Vibration Meter

3. RESPONSIBILITIES 3.1. Unit Supjervisor The UNIT SUPERVISOR has authority for the overall performance of this test and the safe operation of the Unit. He maintains the "Big Picture."

- The ASB TEST COORDINATOR reports to the UNIT SUPERVISOR, is responsible for test execution, and provides an interface with appropriate levels of plant management.

- The ASB TEST COORDINATOR does not provide direction to any Licensed Operators.

- All remaining personnel involved in the performance of this test report to the ASB TEST COORDINATOR.

3.2. ASB Test Coordinator The ASB TEST COORDINATOR has the following duties and responsibilities with respect to the activities being controlled by this Temporary Procedure.

TIC-1 463 Revision 0 Page 8 of 71

- ASSURE that plant physical modifications and Work Orders required for ASB installation have been satisfactorily completed and that there are no exceptions, which affect the ability of the plant to support power ascension testing and operation at 2957 MWt.

- ASSURE that the Regulatory Affairs Manager has verified that all Regulatory Comm itments related to operation above 2511 MWt have been completed or, if they involve testing, then they are incorporated herein.

- MAINTAINS administrative and physical control of this Temporary Procedure.

- COORDINATES the activities requiring completion by this Temporary Procedure to assure they are completed in a timely manner.

- MAINTAINS technical control of this Temporary Procedure and is AUTHORIZED to make changes to the system and equipment acceptance limits following an engineering evaluation that justifies the change.

- ASSURES this Temporary Procedure is updated and maintained current with work and testing activities controlled by this Temporary Procedure.

- PRESENTS the power ascension test results to Station Management following completion of power ascension up to 2511 MWt.

- REVIEWS exceptions to this Temporary Procedure and EXPEDITES their resolution if they affect power ascension testing as required by this Temporary Procedure.

- AUTHORIZES, with the concurrence of the Plant Manager, the next step in power ascension up to 2511 MWt if test data results meet the Acceptance Criteria or Exceptions to Acceptance Criteria have been reconciled.

- OBTAINS Plant Manager or designee approval for each power ascension step above 2511 MWt.

- ASSURES that Shift Personnel are knowledgeable of test activities being controlled and performed by this Temporary Procedure.

3.3. Plant Manager

- The PLANT MANAGER or his designee shall AUTHORIZE each power ascension step above 2511 MWt.

3.4. Data Taker or Verification Person DATA TAKER OR VERIFICATION PERSON is any individual who takes system and equipment performance data, reviews data or verifies the accuracy of data, transfers data or verifies the data satisfies Test Criteria. This person may be any individual who by their position has the knowledge, experience or expertise to perform the specific activity required by the Temporary Procedure.

TIC-i 463 Revision 0 Page 9 of 71

4. PREREQUISITES, PRECAUTIONS, AND LIMITATIONS 4.1. Prerequiusites 4.1.1. Quad Cities Station Management shall assign ASB TEST COORDINATORS to perform the duties as required by this Temporary Procedure.

Assigned: Assigned:

Day Shift ASB Test Coordinator Night Shift ASB Test Coordinator 4.1.2. ASB TEST COORDINATOR shall assign DATA TAKERS / VERIFICATION PERSONS to be responsible for the data required by this Temporary Procedure, and shall log their names in Log 10.2, "Exceptions Index." Changes in data taking responsibilities shall also be logged in Log 10.2 as they occur.

Assigned By:

ASB Test Coordinator 4.1.3. Acoustic Side Branch - Related Modifications and Work Orders:

These modifications or parts replacement have been installed in accordance with design engineering requirements. Applicable post maintenance or modification testing has been sufficiently completed and procedures revised as required. The Operations Department has accepted the modified system and there are no exceptions, which preclude power ascension testing, or power operation above 2511 MWt. This allows the possibility that some of these modifications or parts replacement may be tested at power as part of this test or separately. The ASB TEST COORDINATOR (ASBTC) may sign verification for these steps.

1. Addition of Acoustic Side Branch to Safety Relief Valves and Electromatic Relief Valves (WO 885018) EC 359004 Verified __ _ _ _ _ _ _/ _ _ _

ASBTC Date

2. ERV ACTUATOR REPLACEMENT (UNIT 2) EC 359513 Verified __ _ _ _ _ _ _/ _ _ _

ASBTC Date

3. LOAD REDUCTION - ERV HARDENING - INSTRUMENTATION EC 359074 Verified __ _ _ _ _ _ _/ _ _ _

ASBTC Date

TIC-i 463 Revision 0 Page 10 of 71

4. lnstail MSL Strain Gages Required to Monitor ASB Installation EC 359074 Verified________/ ___

ASBTC Date 4.1.4. The 02R1 8 Startup Power Ascension Plan has been loaded into Gen Manager.

Verified _________/___

ASBTC Date 4.1.5. Discussions have been held with Exelon Energy Delivery/Transmission System Operations informing them that the Station intends to increase load to 930 MWe and this requires that the Unit carry a minimal amount of MVARs.

Verified _________/___

ASBTC Date 4.1.6. MSL Strain Gage and EPU Vibration Monitoring Instrumentation Systems were successfully functionally checked.

Verified _________/___

ASBTC Date

TIC-i1 463 Revision 0 Page 11 of 71 4.1.7. NRC Commitments Throughout the Quad Cities Replacement Steam Dryer and ASB Projects, commitments may have been made to the NRC. If made, these commitments were tracked via Corporate Licensing, and the items requiring completion have been completed or will be upon completion of the activities controlled by this Temporary Procedure.

Evaluation Comments (if none, enter none in the space provided):

Verified ___________I___

Regulatory Affairs Manager Date

TIC-i1 463 Revision 0 Page 12 of 71 4.1.8. Temporary Modifications Review The Temporary Modification Log has been reviewed and all installed Temporary Modifications have been evaluated for their impact on this Power Ascension Test and EPU operation with the ASB modification in place, and have been found acceptable. Exceptions requiring action shall be listed below.

Evaluation Comments (if none, enter none in the space provided):

Verified _________/___

ASBTC Date 4.1.9. Authorization for Power Ascension up to 2511 MWt and operating within the MELLLA Region of the Power/Flow Map The requirements of Section 4. 1, "Prerequisites," of this Temporary Procedure have been completed and any exceptions have been evaluated and found acceptable for commencement of power ascension up to 2511 MWt and Senior Management's approval has been obtained. Separate Senior Management approval will be obtained again for power ascension above 2511 MWt.

Authorized by:

Regulatory Affairs Manager __________________

(Signature / Date)

ASB Test Coordinator__________________

(Signature / Date)

Engineering Director___________________

(Signature / Date)

Operations Director __________________

(Signature /Date)

Plant Manager __________________

(Signature /Date)

TIC-i 463 Revision 0 Page 13 of 71 4.2. Precautions 4.2.1. Section 6, "Main Body," contains separate steps for each increase in power level.

Each step shall be completed in order (step 6.1 before step 6.2 before step 6.3..

etc). Each sub-step requires the collection and evaluation of system and equipment performance data. Data collection and evaluation may be performed in any order within that particular power level.

4.2.2. System and equipment performance shall be closely monitored to assure that operating limits are not exceeded and test criteria are met. In addition to equipment monitoring related to the replacement ASB modification, monitoring of equipment affected by other modifications installed during 02R18, and monitoring of equipment previously discovered to be vulnerable at EPU conditions, is also necessary.

Additionally, plant systems and equipment in general are monitored in accordance with normal operating procedures, annunciators, computer alarms, round sheets, etc.

4.3. Limitations 4.3.1. This power ascension test procedure provides requirements for monitoring, reviewing and evaluating ASB performance data, Main Steam Line strain gage data and vibration data prior to placing the Main Generator on line, and during power ascension to the pre-EPU power level of approximately 2511 MWt. This Temporary Procedure also provides for data collection during power ascension from approximately 2511 MWt to the licensed EPU power level of approximately 2957 MWt.

4.3.2. If Operability Determination 437638, Electromatic Relief Valve Actuators Physically Degrade During Long Term Operation at EPU Power Levels, is not closed for this Unit with the Testing completed at Test Condition 18, then the unit is not to exceed a total of 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months above 2511 MWth. If this is the case, plant data will be taken and a steam dryer moisture carryover sample will be collected, then power will be reduced to 2511 MWth or lower.

4.3.3. Short-term operation at EPU licensed power will be maintained for a minimum of 2 hours2.314815e-5 days 5.555556e-4 hours 3.306878e-6 weeks 7.61e-7 months to a maximum of 6 hours6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months for the purpose of collecting data and checking moisture carryover values. Power will then be reduced to 2511 MWt (consistent with pre-E PU) if all Level 1 and Level 2 acceptance criteria are satisfied. If the acceptance criteria are not satisfied, power will be reduced to the level where the criteria are satisfied.

4.3.4. The PLANT MANAGER or his designee shall AUTHORIZE each power ascension step above 2511 MWt.

4.3.5. Strain gages were installed at selected locations on the Main Steam Lines inside of primary containment and inputted into Digital Data Recorders under temporary configuration change EC 359074. Data acquisition/recording of Strain Gage data will be performed during power ascension to the pre-EPU power level of

TIC-i 463 Revision 0 Page 14 of 71 approximately 2511 MWt, and then from 2511 MWt to short-term operation at licensed EPU power. Strain Gage data shall be recorded after stable power operation is achieved at each established test condition during power ascension to licensed EPU power.

4.3.6. Inside the Drywell, Vibration Monitoring of many components was installed as part of the EPU Main Steam Line Vibration Evaluation. Data acquisition/recording of vibration data will be performed during power ascension to the pre-EPU power level of approximately 2511 MWt, and then from 2511 MWt to short term operation at licensed EPU power. Vibration data shall be recorded after stable power operation is achieved at each established test condition during power ascension to licensed EPU power.

4.3.7. If any strain gage or accelerometer becomes nonfunctional during power ascension, then the acceptability of continued monitoring with the loss of that instrument will be determined by the use of Attachment 9.5. If the requirements of Attachment 9.5 cannot be met, test performance may continue provided an evaluation by Engineering determines that based upon the results achieved by other sensors, etc.

that sufficient instrumentation remains functional. This will be documented in an Engineering Change (EC) and the resolution will be documented in Log 10.2, Exceptions Index.

4.3.8. Moisture carryover measurements shall be taken in accordance with CY-QC- 120-502, "Reactor Water Carryover and Powder Demin Radioactive Removal Efficiency,"

1. After stable plant operation has been achieved for a minimum of 3.5 hours5.787037e-5 days 0.00139 hours 8.267196e-6 weeks 1.9025e-6 months at Test Condition 9 (approximately 75% power).

2. After stable plant operation has been achieved for a minimum of 3.5 hours5.787037e-5 days 0.00139 hours 8.267196e-6 weeks 1.9025e-6 months at Test Condition 11 (approximately 85% power)

3. After stable plant operation has been achieved for a minimum of 2 hours2.314815e-5 days 5.555556e-4 hours 3.306878e-6 weeks 7.61e-7 months at Test Condition 18 (near licensed EPUI power).

4. Daily in accordance with CY-QC-1 10-637, "Schedule of Surveillance Requirements."

4.3.9. If unexplained Moisture Carryover is > 0.3%, then the Station Duty Team shall be CONTACTED for resolution and the power ascension halted. If a sample confirmation after the first sample is still > 0.3% and sample contamination is ruled out and if reasonable assurance of dryer structural integrity cannot be confirmed, then POSITIVE ACTIONS will be taken to further reduce reactor power up to and including reactor shutdown. In addition, the Resident NRC Inspector should be notified on any Moisture Carryover results that are > 0.30%/ (first sample or confirmatory sample).

4.3.10. The reaching of any Abort Criteria or any unexplained change in reactor and plant parameters, MSL and valve strain gage or vibration levels, or moisture carryover must be DOCUMENTED by the initiation of an Issue Report (IR). The Corrective

TIC-i 463 Revision 0 Page 15 of 71 Action Program will control resolution of the condition. In addition, the Resident NRC Inspector should be notified on the reaching of abort criteria.

4.3.11. If data collected as part of Data Sets possessing Level 1 or Level 2 Acceptance Criteria are suspected to be erroneous, then an Issue Report shall be INITIATED and ENGINEERING shall RESOLVE the Issue. If the erroneous data resulted in a Level 1 Acceptance Criteria being exceeded, then PLANT MANAGER Approval of the Issue Resolution shall be OBTAINED.

4.3.12. If any unexpected plant perturbations occur (e.g. relay chatter) during power ascension from 2511 MWt to approximately 2957 MWt that could adversely affect the safe operation of the unit, then REQUEST operations to REDUCE POWER and RETURN the plant to the last known acceptable operating configuration. An IR shall be GENERATED.

4.3.13. Upon completion of data collection and during the soak period until the next step in power ascension, reactor power shall be MAINTAINED and shall not EXCEED the level required by the last step increase in accordance with station operating procedures and shift instructions.

4.3.14. Computer program 005 determines reactor thermal power for license compliance and is used for recording reactor thermal power as required by this Temporary Procedure.

4.3.15. The Main Generator gross output limit is determined by the Main Generator Capability Curve contained in QCGP 3-1 "Reactor Power Operations." This relates to 960 MVA with the maximum MVAR loading at 300 MVARs and a power factor of 0.95. At these conditions the Generator will be limited to 912 MWe. Therefore, it is possible to safely exceed 912 MWe output by use of this Temporary Procedure for the Unit 2 Generator, provided the Capability Curve requirements are met.

4.3.16. All Plant maneuvers and operation shall be PERFORMED in accordance with applicable Quad Cities procedures per the existing command and control authority as defined in the Station Administrative Procedures, including power changes in accordance with QCGP 3-1, "Reactor Power Operations."

4.3.17. If Differences should arise between this Procedure and Vendor-Supplied Reference Documents, then this Procedure shall Rule.

4.3.18. Abort Criteria

1. If unexpected plant conditions occur during the performance of this Temporary Procedure, then STOP the test. If testing is stopped due to adverse plant conditions or at the order of the UNIT SUPERVISOR, then REQUEST operations to REDUCE POWER and RETURN the plant to the last known acceptable operating configuration. In addition, the Resident NRC Inspector should be notified if any abort criteria is reached.

TIC-i 463 Revision 0 Page 16 of 71

2. The ASB TEST COORDINATOR may suspend testing if system and/or equipment performance does not exhibit predictable behavior in compliance with design expectations.

3. If power ascension is suspended for any reason,, then the date and time of the suspension along with an explanation for the suspension shall be ENTERED into Log 10.2, "Exceptions Index," and signed by the ASB TEST COORDINATOR. Following correction of the reason for suspension, then the ASIB TEST COORDINATOR by written instruction on the Exception Index, with concurrence from the SHIFT MANAGER, shall AUTHORIZE restart of power ascension testing. These instructions shall identify the step within this Temporary Procedure from which restart commences. If a step within the Temporary Procedure is to be repeated, then copies of the applicable pages shall be ATTACHED (and identified as such on the exception page and attachment index page) and COMPLETED in the same manner as the original step of the test.

4. Notify the UNIT SUPERVISOR immediately when:

- A procedure step cannot be successfully completed.

- Recorded data fails to meet the Acceptance Criteria.

- Any abnormality is noted in System or Equipment operating performance.

4.3.19. Authorization for Power Ascension above 2511 MWt and operating within the MELLLA Region of the Power/Flow Map will be documented by performing step 6.12.6 4.3.20. Notify the NRC Resident when there is an inability to satisfy a Level 1 criterion, any change is made to a Level 2 criterion, or any decision to continue testing even though a Level 2 criterion is exceeded.

4.3.21. Notify the NRC Resident on the Loss of any MSL strain gage or accelerometer instrumentation.

5. PERFORMANCE ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA 5.1. General Any change other than Editorial Changes to a Level 1 criteria must be approved by PORC.

5.1.1. LEVEL 1 TEST CRITERIA could be associated with plant safety.

1. If a LEVEL 1 TEST CRITERION LIMIT is not, satisfied, then the plant shall be PLACED in a known safe condition based on prior testing.

2. An Issue Report shall be INITIATED.

TIC-i 463 Revision 0 Page 17 of71

3. RESOLUTION of the Issue must be immediately pursued by equipment adjustments or through engineering evaluation as appropriate. A description of the Issue, its resolution and successful completion of the test must be documented within this Temporary Procedure.

4. The ASB TEST COORDINATOR may not change LEVEL 1 TEST CRITERION LIMITS.

5.1 .2. LEVEL 2 TEST CRITERIA are usually associated with design expectations of system performance.

1. If a LEVEL 2 TEST CRITERION LIMIT were not satisfied, then plant operation or test plans would not necessarily have to be altered.

2. An Issue Report shall be INITIATED.

3. The ASB TEST COORDINATOR with concurrence from the PLANT MANAGER can authorize continuation of this test.

5.2. EPU Vibration Monitoring Instrumentation Acceptance Criteria 5.2.1. EPU Vibration Monitoring Instrumentation Acceptance Criteria have been incorporated into Attachment 9.2, "EPU Vibration Monitoring Instrumentation Data Sheet."

5.3. Main Steam Line Strain Gage Instrumentation Acceptance Criteria 5.3.1. Main Steam Line Strain Gage Instrumentation Acceptance Criteria have been incorporated into Attachment 9.3, "Main Steam Line Strain Gage Data Sheet."

5.4. Individual Eguipment Vibration Monitoring Acceptance Criteria 5.4.1. Individual Equipment Vibration Monitoring Acceptance Criteria have been incorporated into Attachment 9.4, "Equipment Vibration Monitoring Utilizing Hand Held M&TE."

5.5. Steam Dryer Moisture Carryover Acceptance Criteria 5.5.1. Steam Dryer Moisture Carryover Acceptance Criteria have been incorporated into the procedure CY-QC-1 20-502, "Reactor Water Carryover and Powder Demin Radioactive Removal Efficiency."

TIC-i 463 Revision 0 Page 18 of 71

6. MAIN BODY 6.1. General Instructions 6.1.1. Activities that recur at different Test Conditions are listed on Log 10.1, "Evaluation and Completion Signoff."

1. Test Condition Steps that follow, that have activities listed on Log 10. 1, also have a Log 10. 1 Completion signoff.

2. When all Log 10. 1 activities required for a particular Test Condition are complete, then the ASB TEST COORDINATOR shall SIGN and DATE the corresponding Test Condition sub-step signoff.

6.1 .2. Unique Activities relating to particular Test Conditions are identified in Test Condition sub-steps, along with corresponding signoffs.

1. When each Unique Activity is complete, then the ASB TEST COORDINATOR shall SIGN and DATE the corresponding Test Condition sub-step signoff.

6.1.3. For all Test Conditions above 2511 MWt, the ASB TEST COORDINATOR shall OBTAIN PLANT MANAG ER/Designee authorization to proceed.

6.1.4. When all Activities for a particular Test Condition are complete, then the ASB TEST COORDINATOR shall Authorize that the Unit can proceed to the next Test Condition.

6.1 .5. RECORD the initial Digital Recorder Channel Numbers on the Master Copy of Attachments 9.2 and 9.3. If Digital Recorder Channel Inputs are required to be re-configured during the testing period for any reason, then MAKE pen-and-ink changes to the appropriate attachments and DOCUMENT the reasons for the re-configuration in Log 10.2, "Exceptions Index".

TIC-1 463 Revision 0 Page 19 of 71 6.2. Test Condition 1 Baseline 6.2.1. When Reactor Pressure reaches 920 psig during the initial reactor heat up, then BALANCE and CALIBRATE (perform Shunt Calibration and Auto Balance) the MSL Strain Gage channels.

Complete:________ _/__

ASB Test Coordinator/Date 6.2.2. Just prior to initiating the Trigger that records data on the following two steps, PERFORM a BALANCE of all MSL Strain Gages.

Complete:________ _/__

ASB Test Coordinator/Date 6.2.3. OBTAIN Data Set from EPU Vibration Monitoring instrumentation, Attachment 9.2.

Complete:________ _/__

ASB Test Coordinator/Date 6.2.4. OBTAIN Data Set from Main Steam Line Strain Gage instrumentation, Attachment 9.3.

Complete:_________I__

ASB Test Coordinator/Date 6.3. Test Condition 2 17.5% 517 MWt 6.3.1. Just prior to initiating the Trigger that records data on the following two steps, PERFORM a BALANCE of all MSL Strain Gages.

Complete: ____________

ASE Test Coordinator/Date 6.3.2. OBTAIN Data Set from EPU Vibration Monitoring instrumentation, Attachment 9.2.

Complete: ___________

ASB Test Coordinator/Date 6.3.3. OBTAIN Data Set from Main Steam Line Strain Gage instrumentation, Attachment

9.3. Complete

ASB Test Coordinator/Date

TIC-i 463 Revision 0 Page 20 of 71 6.4. Test Condition 3 29.1 % 861 MWt 6.4.1. Just prior to initiating the Trigger that records data on the following two steps, PERFORM a BALANCE of all MSL Strain Gages.

Complete:_________I__

ASB Test Coordinator/Date 6.4.2. OBTAIN Data Set from EPU Vibration Monitoring instrumentation, Attachment 9.2.

Complete:________ _/__

ASB Test Coordinator/Date 6.4.3. OBTAIN Data Set from Main Steam Line Strain Gage instrumentation, Attachment

9.3. Complete

ASB Test Coordinator/Date 6.5. Test Condition 4 34.9 % 1033 MWt 6.5.1. Just prior to initiating the Trigger that records data on the following two steps, PERFORM a BALANCE of all MSL Strain Gages.

Complete: ___________

ASB Test Coordinator/Date 6.5.2. OBTAIN Data Set from EPU Vibration Monitoring instrumentation, Attachment 9.2.

Complete: ___________

ASB Test Coordinator/Date 6.5.3. OBTAIN Data Set from Main Steam Line Strain Gage instrumentation, Attachment 9.3.

Complete:________ _/__

ASB Test Coordinator/Date 6.6. Tcoct flc~nritirnn r1 r, rr 0/- 1 RAfl IAiA/t 6.6.1. Just prior to initiating the Trigger that records data on the following two steps, PERFORM a BALANCE of all MSL Strain Gages.

Complete: __________/_ _

ASB Test Coordinator/Date 6.6.2. OBTAIN Data Set from EPU Vibration Monitoring instrumentation, Attachment 9.2.

TIC-i 463 Revision 0 Page 21 of 71 Complete: ___________

ASB Test Coordinator/Date 6.6.3. OBTAIN Data Set from Main Steam Line Strain Gage instrumentation, Attachment 9.3.

Complete:_________/__

ASB Test Coordinator/Date 6.7. Test Condition 6 59.9 % 1770 MWt 6.7.1. Just prior to initiating the Trigger that records data on the following two steps, PERFORM a BALANCE of all MSL Strain Gages.

Complete: ___________

ASB Test Coordinator/Date 6.7.2. OBTAIN Data Set from EPU Vibration Monitoring instrumentation, Attachment 9.2.

Complete: ___________

ASB Test Coordinator/Date 6.7.3. OBTAIN Data Set from Main Steam Line Strain Gage instrumentation, Attachment 9.3.

Complete:/

ASB Test Coordinator/Date 6.8. Test Condition 7 64.6 % 1910 MWt 6.8.1. Just prior to initiating the Trigger that records data on the following two steps, PERFORM a BALANCE of all MSL Strain Gages.

Complete: ___________

ASB Test Coordinator/Date 6.8.2. OBTAIN Data Set from EPU Vibration Monitoring instrumentation, Attachment 9.2.

Complete:_________/__

ASB Test Coordinator/Date 6.8.3. OBTAIN Data Set from Main Steam Line Strain Gage instrumentation, Attachment 9.3.

Complete:________ _/__

ASB Test Coordinator/Date

TIC-i 463 Revision 0 Page 22 of 71 6.9. Test Condition 8 70.0 % 2070 MWt 6.9.1. Just prior to initiating the Trigger that records data on the following two steps, PERFORM a BALANCE of all MSL Strain Gages.

Complete:________ _/__

ASB Test Coordinator/Date 6.9.2. OBTAIN Data Set from EPU Vibration Monitoring instrumentation, Attachment 9.2.

Complete:________ _/__

ASB Test Coordinator/Date 6.9-.3 OBTAIN Data Set from Main Steam Line.Strain Gage instrumentation, Attachment 9.3.

Complete:________ _/__

ASB3 Test Coordinator/Date 6.10. Test Condition 9 75.2 % 2225 MWt 6.10.1. Just prior to initiating the Trigger that records data on the following two steps, PERFORM a BALANCE of all MSL Strain Gages.

Complete:________ _/__

ASB Test Coordinator/Date 6.10.2. OBTAIN Data Set from EPU Vibration Monitoring instrumentation, Attachment 9.2.

Complete:________ _/__

ASB Test Coordinator/Date 6.10.3. OBTAIN Data Set from Main Steam Line Strain Gage instrumentation, Attachment 9.3.

Complete:________ _/__

ASB3 Test Coordinator/Date NOTE 1: For this Test Condition, stable plant operation must be achieved for a minimum of 3.5 hours5.787037e-5 days 0.00139 hours 8.267196e-6 weeks 1.9025e-6 months before the data Moisture Carryover Data is obtained.

NOTE 2: Steam Dryer Moisture Carryover measurements entail another seven-hour period to analyze the sample after the 3.5-hour stabilization period that is required to obtain the samples. For this Test Condition, It is not necessary to delay the ascension to the next power level while the samples are being analyzed. -Step 6.10.4 can be signed

TIC-i 463 Revision 0 Page 23 of 71 off after samples are obtained, and power ascension can proceed.

6.1 0.4. INITIATE Steam Dryer Moisture Carryover samples, CY-QC-120-502, "Reactor Water Carryover and Powder Demin Radioactive Removal Efficiency" Complete: ___________

ASB Test Coordinator/Date 6.11. Test Condition_10 80.0 % 2366 MWt 6.11.1. Just prior to initiating the Trigger that records data on the following two steps, PERFORM a BALANCE of all MSL Strain Gages.

Complete:_________/__

ASB Test Coordinator/Date 6.11.2. OBTAIN Data Set from EPU Vibration Monitoring instrumentation, Attachment 9.2.

Complete: ___________

ASB Test Coordinator/Date 6.11.3. OBTAIN Data Set from Main Steam Line Strain Gage instrumentation, Attachment 9.3.

Complete:_________/__

ASB Test Coordinator/Date 6.12. Test Condition 11 84.9 % 2511 MWt 6.12.1. Just prior to initiating the Trigger that records data on the following two steps, PERFORM a BALANCE of all MSL Strain Gages.

Complete:/

ASB Test Coordinator/Date 6.12.2. OBTAIN Data Set from EPU Vibration Monitoring instrumentation, Attachment 9.2.

Complete: ___________

ASB Test Coordinator/Date 6.12.3. OBTAIN Data Set from Main Steam Line Strain Gage instrumentation, Attachment 9.3.

Complete:_________/__

ASB Test Coordinator/Date

TIC-I 463 Revision 0 Page 24 of 71 NOTE 1: For this Test Condition, stable plant operation must be achieved for a minimum of 3.5 hours5.787037e-5 days 0.00139 hours 8.267196e-6 weeks 1.9025e-6 months before the data acquisition required by step 6.12.4 is obtained.

NOTE 2: Steam Dryer Moisture Carryover measurements entail another seven-hour period to analyze the sample after the 3.5-hour stabilization period that is required to obtain the samples. For this Test Condition, it is not necessary to delay the ascension to the next power level while the samples are being analyzed. Step 6.12.4 can be signed off after samples are obtained, and power ascension can proceed.

6.12.4. INITIATE Steam Dryer Moisture Carryover, CY-QC-1 20-502, "Reactor Water Carryover and Powder Demin Radioactive Removal Efficiency" Complete:________ _/__

ASB Test Coordinator/Date 6.12.5. INITIATE Equipment Vibration Monitoring, Attachment 9.4 Complete: ______/_

ASB Test Coordinator/Date 6.12.6. Issue Report Verification Issue Reports have been reviewed before continuing the power increase above 2511 MWt. The verification must determine whether any issues exist that would preclude the continuation of the power ascension above 2511 MWt. Exceptions requiring action shall be listed below by exception number and shall be annotated in Log 10.2, "Exceptions Index."

Evaluation Comments (if none, enter none in the space provided):

Verified _________/___

ASB Test Coordinator Date

TIC-i 463 Revision 0 Page 25 of 71 6.12.7. AUTHORIZATION from PORO for continued power ascension beyond Test Condition 11 has been obtained- as per Section 4.3, "Limitations," Step 4.3.19.

The results of data collection during the Power Ascension steps up to and including Test Condition 11 have been reviewed by PORC, including any exceptions, and are acceptable for power ascension above 2511 MWt. In addition to the Authorizing Signature from the PORC (PORC Chairperson) obtained below, the Plant Manager or Designee Authorization will be OBTAINED for power ascension above 2511 MWt.

Authorized by:

PORC Chairperson (Signature / Date)

PORC Meeting # _______ Date: _______

Authorized:_________________________/______

Plant Manager or Designee Date NOTE: The Plant Manager or Designee authorization will also be obtained for each power ascension step above 2511 MWth.

CAUTION If Operability Determination 437638, Electromatic Relief Valve Actuators Physically Degrade During Long Term Operation at EPU Power Levels, is not closed for this Unit with the Testing completed at Test Condition 18, then the unit is not to exceed a total of 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months above 2511 MWth. If this is the case, plant data will be taken and a steam dryer moisture carryover sample will be collected, then power will be reduced to 2511 MWth or lower.

TIC-I 463 Revision 0 Page 26 of 71 6.13. Test Condition 12 87.1 % 2576 MWt 6.13.1. Just prior to initiating the Trigger that records data on the following two steps, PERFORM a BALANCE of all MSL Strain Gages.

Complete:_________/__

ASB Test Coordinator/Date 6.13.2. OBTAIN Data Set from EPU Vibration Monitoring instrumentation, Attachment 9.2.

Complete: ___________

ASB Test Coordinator/Date 6.13.3. OBTAIN Data Set from Main Steam Line Strain Gage instrumentation, Attachment

9.3. Complete

ASB Test Coordinator/Date 6.13.4. AUTHORIZATION for power ascension to Test Condition 13.

Authorized: /

Plant Manager or Designee Date 6.14. Test Condition 13 89.3 % 2640 MWt 6.14.1. Just prior to initiating the Trigger that records data on the following two steps, PERFORM a BALANCE of all MSL Strain Gages.

Complete: ___________

ASB Test Coordinator/Date 6.14.2. OBTAIN Data Set from EPU Vibration Monitoring instrumentation, Attachment 9.2.

Complete: ___________

ASB Test Coordinator/Date

TIC-i 463 Revision 0 Page 27 of 71 6.14.3. OBTAIN Data Set from Main Steam Line Strain Gage instrumentation, Attachment 9.3.

Complete:________ _/__

ASB Test Coordinator/Date 6.14.4. AUTHORIZATION for power ascension to Test Condition 14.

Authorized: /

Plant Manager or Designee Date 6.15. Test Condition 14 91.4% 2704 MWt 6.1 5.1. Just prior to initiating the Trigger that records data on the following two steps, PERFORM a BALANCE of all MSL Strain Gages.

Complete:_________I__

ASB Test Coordinator/Date 6.15.2, OBTAIN Data Set from EPU Vibration Monitoring instrumentation, Attachment 9.2.

Complete:/__

ASB Test Coordinator/Date 6.15.3. OBTAIN Data Set from Main Steam Line Strain Gage instrumentation, Attachment

9.3. Complete

ASB Test Coordinator/Date 6.15.4. AUTHORIZATION for power ascension to Test Condition 15.

Authorized: /

Plant Manager or Designee Date

TIC-I 463 Revision 0 Page 28 of 71 6.16. Test Condition 15 93.6 % 2769 MWt 6.1 6.1. Just prior to initiating the Trigger that records data on the following two steps, PERFORM a BALANCE of all MSL Strain Gages.

Complete:________ _/__

ASB Test Coordinator/Date 6.16.2. OBTAIN Data Set from EPU Vibration Monitoring instrumentation, Attachment 9.2.

Complete:________ _/__

ASB Test Coordinator/Date 6.16.3. OBTAIN Data Set from Main Steam Line Strain Gage instrumentation, Attachment

9.3. Complete

ASB Test Coordinator/Date 6.16.4. AUTHORIZATION for power ascension to Test Condition 16.

Authorized: _____________/___

Plant Manager or Designee Date 6.17. Test Condition 16 94.7 % 2800 MWt 6.17.1. Just prior to initiating the Trigger that records data on the following two steps, PERFORM a BALANCE of all MSL Strain Gages.

Complete:________ _/__

ASB Test Coordinator/Date 6.17.2. OBTAIN Data Set from EPU Vibration Monitoring instrumentation, Attachment 9.2.

Complete: ___________

ASB Test Coordinator/Date 6.17.3. OBTAIN Data Set from Main Steam Line Strain Gage instrumentation, Attachment 9.3.

Complete:________ _/__

ASB Test Coordinator/Date

TIC-i 463 Revision 0 Page 29 of 71 CAUTION The Main Generator gross output limit is determined by the Main Generator Capability Curve contained in QCGP 3-1"Reactor Powe r.Ope rations." This relates to 960 MVA with the maximum MVAR loading at 300 MVARs and a power factor of 0.95. At these conditions the Generator will be limited to 912 MWe. Therefore, it is possible to safely exceed 912 MWe output by use of this Temporary Procedure for the Unit 2 Generator, provided the Capability Curve requirements are met. This will entail lowering the MVAR loading on the Unit to a minimal value. Contact TSO and coordinate this action.

6.17.4. AUTHORIZATION for power ascension to Test Condition 17.

Authorized: _____________/___

Plant Manager or Designee Date 6.18. Test Condition 17 95.5% 2823 MWt 6.18.1. Just prior to initiating the Trigger that records data on the following two steps, PERFORM a BALANCE of all MSL Strain Gages.

Complete:/__

ASB Test Coordinator/Date 6.18.2. OBTAIN Data Set from EPU Vibration Monitoring instrumentation, Attachment 9.2.

Complete: ___________

ASB Test Coordinator/Date 6.18.3. OBTAIN Data Set from Main Steam Line Strain Gage instrumentation, Attachment

9.3. Complete

ASB Test Coordinator/Date 6.1 8.4. AUTHORIZATION for power ascension to Test Condition 18.

Authorized: _____________________________

Plant Manager or Designee Date

TIC-i 463 Revision 0 Page 30 of 71 6.19. Test Condition 18 97.20/ 2846 MWt (or maximum achievable).

CAUTION If Operability Determination 437638, Electromatic Relief Valve Actuators Physically Degrade During Long Term Operation at EPU Power Levels, is not closed for this Unit with the Testing completed at Test Condition 18, then the unit is not to exceed a total of 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months above 2511 MWth. If this is the case, plant data will be taken and a steam dryer moisture carryover sample will be collected, then power will be reduced to 2511 MWth or lower.

6.19.1. Just prior to initiating the Trigger that records data on the following two steps, PERFORM a BALANCE of all MSL Strain Gages.

Complete:________ _/__

ASB Test Coordinator/Date 6.19.2. OBTAIN Data Set from EPU Vibration Monitoring instrumentation, Attachment 9.2.

Complete: ___________

ASB Test Coordinator/Date 6.1 9.3. OBTAIN Data Set from Main Steam Line Strain Gage instrumentation, Attachment 9.3.

Complete:________ _/__

ASB Test Coordinator/Date NOTE 1: For this Test Condition, stable plant operation must be achieved for a minimum of two hours before the data acquisition required by the step below is obtained.

NOTE 2: Steam Dryer Moisture Carryover measurements entail another seven-hour period to analyze the sample after the two-hour stabilization period that is required to obtain the samples. For this Test Condition, it is not necessary to delay test. Step 6.19.4 can be signed off after samples are obtained,

TIC-i 463 Revision 0 Page 31 of 71 6.19.4. INITIATE Steam Dryer Moisture Carryover, CY-QC-1 20-502, "Reactor Water Carryover and Powder Demin Radioactive Removal Efficiency" Complete: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

ASB Test Coordinator/Date 6.19.5. INITIATE Equipment Vibration Monitoring, Attachment 9.4 Complete:_________I__

ASB Test Coordinator/Date

TIC-i1 463 Revision 0 Page 32 of 71

7. RETURN TO NORMAL 7.1. Post-Testina Power Level 7.1.1. IF all Level 1 and Level 2 Acceptance Criteria ARE satisfied, THEN RETURN power level to 2511 M~t.

ASB Test Coordinator/Date 7.1 .2. IF all Level 1 and Level 2 Acceptance Criteria ARE NOT satisfied, TH EN RETURN power to a level in which the criteria are satisfied.

Power Level to which the Unit was reduced:______

ASB Test Coordinator/Date

TIC-i 463 Revision 0 Page 33 of 71 7.1.3. For the Main Steam Line Accelerometer data (Attachment 9.2) and the Main Steam Line Strain Gage data (Attachment 9.3), for Test Conditions 12 through 18, engineering shall analyze the data and compare the results to the Acceptance Criteria stated on Attachment 9.2 and Attachment 9.3.

ASB Test Coordinator/Date 7.1 .4. Setup a process to perform at least monthly data gathering of the data specified in the Attachments 9.2 and 9.3. Trend the data looking for changes that would indicate changes in the performance of the ASB's. Minimum instrumentation desired would be at least two functional instruments per steam line. Continue at least monthly trending until the next refueling outage, when the ASB's will be inspected for degradation.

ASB Test Coordinator/Date

TIC-i 463 Revision 0 Page 34 of 71 8& REFERENCES 8.1. Commitments 8.1.1. Letter RS-05-064, dated May 13, 2005, from Jeffrey A. Benjamin to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

8.1.2. Letter RS-06-015, dated January 26, 2006, from Keith R. Jury to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Commitments and Plans Related to Extended Power Uprate Operation.

8.2. Procedures 8.2.1. QCGP 1-1, "Normal Unit Startup" 8.2.2. QCGP 3-1, "Reactor Power Operations" 8.2.3. QCGP 4-1, "Control Rod Movements and Control Rod Sequence" 8.2.4. CY-QC-1 20-502, "Reactor Water Carryover and Powder Demin Radioactive Removal Efficiency"~

8.2.5. CY-QC-1 10-637, "Schedule of Surveillance Requirements" 8.3. Other 8.3.1. Engineering Evaluation EC 348316, "Evaluation of Quad Cities Unit 2 Main Steam Vibrations at EPU Power Levels."

8.3.2. C.D.I. Technical Memorandum No. 05-17, Pretest Predictions for New Dryer Loads for Quad Cities, Continuum Dynamics, Inc.

8.3.3. NES-MS-03.04, "Small Bore Piping Design for High cycle Fatigue" 8.3.4. Letter RS 05-064, dated May 13, 2005, from Jeffrey A. Benjamin to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

TIC-i1 463 Revision 0 Page 35 of 71

9. ATTACHMENTS 9.1. Test Condition Summary 9.2. EPU Vibration Monitoring Instrumentation Data Sheet 9.3. Main Steam Line Strain Gage Instrumentation Data Sheet 9.4. Equipment Vibration Monitoring Utilizing Hand Held M&TE 9.5. Minimum Functional Instrumentation

10. LOGS 10.1. Evaluation and Completion Signoff 10.2. Exceptions Index

TIC-i 463 Revision 0 Page 36 of 71 ATTACHMENT 9.1 :TEST CONDITION

SUMMARY

Approx. Approx.

Test Generator Core Core Cniin Power Thermal Thermal Coniton (MWe) Power Power(%

1 0 225 7.6%

2 120 517 17.5%

3 200 861 29.1%

4 300 1033 34.9%

5 500 1640 55.5%

6 550 1770 59.9%

7 600 1910 64.6%

8 650 2070 70.0%

9 700 2225 75.2%

10 750 2366 80.0%

11 800 2511 84.9%

12 825 2576 87.1%

13 850 2640 89.3%

14 875 2704 91.4%/

[15 900 2769 93.6%

16 912 1 2800 94.7%

17 921 2823 95.5%

18 1 930 j 2846 96.2%

TIC-i1463 Revision 0 Page 37 of 71 ATTACHMENT 9.2: EPU VIBRATION MONITORING DATA SHEET At All Test Conditions SECTION 1 DATA GATHERING Test Condition: _________ Power Level (MWI)

Instructions:

NOTE: Initial EPU Vibration Instrument Sensor Channel locations have been recorded in Section 3. If, due to sensor or channel failures, Channel inputs must be re-configured, then perform pen-and-ink changes to Section 3 and make a clarifying entry into Log 10.2, "Exceptions Index."

1. For all specified Test Conditions, VERIFY that a set of data was OBTAINED at this Test Condition for the EPU vibration instruments.

Verified: ________________

Data Taker or ASB Test Coordinator

2. For Test Conditions 9, 11, and following 18, VERIFY that the Acceptance Criteria of Section 2 were SATISIFIED or RECONCILED.

Verified:

Data Taker or ASB Test Coordinator

3. SIGN Log 10.1, "Evaluation and Completion Signoff," for this Attachment at this Test Condition.

Completed:

Data Taker or ASB Test Coordinator

TIC-i 463 Revision 0 Page 38 of 71 ATTACHMENT 9.2: EPUI VIBRATION MONITORING DATA SHEET SECTION 2 ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA Vibration Acceptance Criteria Level 1 Main Steam Line Accelerometers: Data will be gathered at all of the Test Conditions specified in the Main Body of the Temporary Procedure, in order to support future analysis. However, not all Test Conditions have Level 1 Criteria.

For Test Conditions 11 and 18, ENGINEERING shall compare data gathered under this Temporary Procedure to data from the same locations, previously gathered and analyzed as part of Engineering Evaluation EC 355702, "Evaluation Of Vibration Results After Dryer Replacement - Unit 2." The comparison for this acceptance criterion will be between the measured vibrations at the current Test Condition to:

1. An envelop of the Unit 1 and Unit 2 of the data gathered at pre-ASB full EPU power level.

The Level 1 Criteria is deemed to have been met if ENGINEERING determines, that for each accelerometer that was functional in the identical locations on both during startup from pre-ASB installation and post-ASB installation, that:

1. The overall g root mean square (rms) vibration level obtained at the Test Condition is less than or equal to the g rms level obtained at the pre-ASB conditions.

2. The frequency domain spectra comparisons for the ERV and Target Rock inlet flanges show no new peaks greater than the historical pre-ASB measurements. New peaks are defined to be those peaks that are greater than 20% of the maximum amplitude of the dominant peak in the spectra on pre-ASB measurements.

TIC-i 463 Revision 0 Page 39 of 71 Vibration Acceptance Criteria (Continued)

The ASB Level 1 vibration criterion based upon canister shaker table testing is the vibration acceleration amplitude in the axial direction should be less than 3.2 g RMS if measured on the blind flange of the ASB and less than 3.0 g RMS if measured on the pipe end of the ASB. The vibration acceleration amplitude in the transverse direction at the flange end of the ASB should be less than 4.6 g RMS when the two transverse direction accelerometers are combined in a Square Root of the Sum of the Squares (SRSS) method.

The Level 1 Criteria for the accelerometers on the new ERV actuators is the integrated spectrum rms values must be less than 4 g rms based upon a frequency interval between 30 Hz and 200 Hz. The measured displacement must be less than 4.4 mils rms based upon a frequency interval between 30 Hz and 200 Hz. A horizontal value that is the square root of the sum of the squares (SRSS) of the two orthogonal horizontal components should be obtained and compared to the acceptance criteria value. The vertical component should be compared directly to the acceptance criteria value. The instruments that these acceptance criteria were based upon are the ERV pilot valve accelerometers. These were the input values to the shaker table tests. If instrumentation problems occur with the pilot valve accelerometers, then conservative readings of using actuator measurements may be used against these acceptance criteria. If the acceptance criteria for the pilots are too conservative for the actuator measurements, new acceptance criteria for the actuator measurements may be requested from Engineering and applied.

The Level 1 Criteria for the accelerometers on the Target Rock Relief Valve, the HPCI Steam Supply Valve Actuator (2-2301-4), and the "B" MSIV Stuffing Box were obtained from the an analysis performed by Sargent and Lundy (SL-008739) and are equal to the values that were recorded at EPU power levels prior to the installation of the ASB's.

Level 2 Main Steam Line Accelerometers: Data will be gathered at all of the Test Conditions specified in the Main Body of the Temporary Procedure, in order to support future analysis. However, not all Test Conditions have Level 2 Criteria.

For Test Conditions 9, 11, and following 18, ENGINEERING shall compare data gathered under this Temporary Procedure to data from the same locations, previously gathered and analyzed as part of Engineering Evaluation EC 355702, "Evaluation Of Vibration Results After Dryer Replacement - Unit 2." The comparison for this acceptance criterion will be between the measured vibrations at the current Test Condition:

1. An envelop of the Unit 1 and Unit 2 of the levels that are the pre-ASB 2511 MWt (OLTP)]I measurements plus 25% of the difference between pre-ASB 2511 MWt (OLTP) measurements and the pre-ASB full EPU measurements. Note that the level 2 criteria in the table in Section 3 for the ERV flanges are the pre-ASB OLTP measurements. If actual readings are slightly above the values in the table, it is permissible to ratio the Level 2 readings in the table up 25% of the difference between pre-ASB OLIP measurements and the pre-ASB full EPU measurements.

TIC-i 463 Revision 0 Page 40 of 71 Vibration Acceptance Criteria (Continued)

The Level 2 Criteria is deemed to have been met if ENGINEERING determines, that for each accelerometer that was functional in the identical locations on both during startup from pre-ASB installation and post-ASB installation, that:

1. The overall g rms vibration level obtained at the Test Condition is less than or equal to the g rms level obtained at the pre-ASB conditions.

2. If the criterion above is not satisfied, Engineering may evaluate the cause by performing a detailed inspection of the frequency domain spectra and will document in an Engineering Change (EC), the acceptability of the vibration measurements.

The ASB Level 2 vibration criterion based upon canister shaker table testing is the vibration acceleration amplitude in the axial direction should be less than 1.6 g RMS if measured on the blind flange of the ASB and less than 1.5 g RMS if measured on the pipe end of the ASB. The vibration acceleration amplitude in the transverse direction at the flange end of the ASB should be less than 2.3 g RMS when the two transverse direction accelerometers are combined in a Square Root of the Sum of the Squares (SRSS) method.

The Level 2 Criteria for the accelerometers on the new ERV actuators is the integrated spectrum rms values must be less than 2 g rms based upon a frequency interval between 30 Hz and 200 Hz. The measured displacement must be less than 2.2 mils rms based upon a frequency interval between 30 Hz and 200 Hz. A horizontal value that is the square root of the sum of the squares (SRSS) of the two orthogonal horizontal components should be obtained and compared to the acceptance criteria value. The vertical component should be compared directly to the acceptance criteria value. The instruments that these acceptance criteria were based upon are the ERV pilot valve accelerometers. These were the input values to the shaker table tests. If instrumentation problems occur with the pilot valve accelerometers, then conservative readings of using actuator measurements may be used against these acceptance criteria. If the acceptance criteria for the pilots are too. conservative for the actuator measurements, new acceptance criteria for the actuator measurements may be requested from Engineering and applied.

The Level 2 Criteria for the accelerometers on the Target Rock Relief Valve, the HPCI Steam Supply Valve Actuator (2-2301 -4), and the "B" MSIV Stuffing Box were obtained from the an analysis performed by Sargent and Lundy (SL-008739) and are 85% of the Level 1 Criteria.

TIC-i 463 Revision 0 Page 41 of 71 ATTACHMENT 9.2: EPU VIBRATION MONITORING DATA SHEET SECTION 3 EPU VIBRATION INSTRUMENTATION LOCATIONS SECTION 3A MAIN STEAM LINE ACCELEROMETER LOCATIONS AND ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA Acceptance Criteria (g Location Recorder rms)

Channel Level 1 Level 2 1A Inlet X,2 Conductor W/ Shield 0.286 grins 0.243 grins I Target Flange Rock Y, 2 Conductor W/ Shield 1.698 grins 1.443 grins Z,2 Conductor W/ Shield 0.393 grins 0.334 grins X22 Conductor W/ Shield 0_____.286grins 0.243 grins Y2________ 2 Conductor W/ Shield _____1.698 grins 1.443 grins Z22 Conductor W/ Shield .334 grins 0____.33gis 2 3B ERV Inlet X,2 Conductor W/ Shield 0.191 grins _.075 grms Flange Y,2 Conductor W/ Shield 0.416 grins .6 r Z,2 Conductor W/ Shield 0.389 grins 0.130 grms X22 Conductor W/ Shield 0____.191grins 0.075gcrms' Y22 Conductor W/ Shield 0.41____ 0 4grff 163~p Z2________ 2 Conductor W/ Shield 0____.389grins 0.130 grins SRSS X&Z 4.4 SRSS X&Z 2.2 Pilot X 2 Conductor W/ Shield mils / 4.0 q mils / 2.0 q Valve Y 2 Conductor W/ Shield 4.4 mils / 4.0 g 2.2 mils / 2.0 g_

SRSS X&Z 4.4 LRSS X&Z 2.2 Z 2 Conductor W/ Shield mils / 4.0 g Ils / 2.0 g Recorded for future analysis. Use pilot alve acceptance criteria (conservative) or Actuator X 2 Conductor W/t Shield pot rtei ihEng input.

Recorded for future analysis. Use pilot Jat e acceptance criteria (conservative) or Y____________ 2 Conductor W/ Shield -.pdate crrteria with Err inoat.

I Recorded for future anafysis. Use pifot

/afve acceptance critetia (conservatiae) or

______________ ________________ 2 Conductor W/ Shield j date criteria with Eng inpat.

Note that for ERV flanges. Level 2 criteria presented in this table are OLTP historical measurements. These could be ratio'ed up 25%

towards the Level 1 criteria,. if actual measurements are slightly above these Level 2 values. See discussion on page 39.

TIC-i 463 Revision 0 Page 42 of 71 ATTACHMENT 9.2: EPU VIBRATION MONITORING DATA SHEET SECTION 3 EPU VIBRATION INSTRUMENTATION LOCATIONS SECTION 3A MAIN STEAM LINE ACCELEROMETER LOCATIONS AND ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA Acceptance Location Recorder Criteria (g rms)

Channel

_________Level 1 Level 2 3 3C ERV Inlet Flange X,2 Conductor W/ Shield NA NA 0.222 grins Y,2 Conductor W/ Shield 0.698 grins*1 0.141 grins Z,2 Conductor W/ Shield 0.____258 gris X22 Conductor W/ Shield _____NA NA 0.222 grins Y,2 Conductor W/ Shield 0698 grins _____

0.141 grins Z22 Conductor W/ Shield 0.258 grins_____

SRSS X&Z SRSS X&Z Pilot Valve X 4.4 mils / 2.2 mils /

2 Conductor W/ Shield - 4. g .

4.4 mils / 2.2 inils /

Y 2 Conductor W/ Shield 4. q 2, SRSS X&Z SRSS X&Z z 4.4 mils / 2.2 mils/

Z2 Conductor W/ Shield 4-0 20 Recorded for future analysis.

Use pilot salve acceptance Actuator X 2 Conductor W/ Shield criteria (conservative) or update 1riteri a with Eng input.

Recorded for future analysis.

use pilot valve acceptance Y riteria (conservative) or update 2 Conductor W1 Shield ______riteria with Eng input.

lecorued tor future analysis.

vsepilot valve acceptance

_____________2 Z Conductor W/ Shield ýriteria Iconservative) or update criteria with Eng inpvt-

TIC-i 463 Revision 0 Page 43 of 71 ATTACHMENT 9.2: EPU VIBRATION MONITORING DATA SHEET SECTION 3 EPU VIBRATION INSTRUMENTATION LOCATIONS SECTION 3A MAIN STEAM LINE ACCELEROMETER LOCATIONS AND ACCEPTANCE Recor Acceptance Criteria Location der (g rms)

Chann ell Level 1 Level12 0.533 grms 4 3D ERV Inlet Flange X,2 Conductor W/ Shield 1.596 grins _____

Y,2 Conductor W/ Shield 1.238 grins __561_____

0.528 grins Z,2 Conductor W/ Shield 1.832 grins _____

0.533 grins X22 Conductor W/ Shield 1.596 grins _____

0.561 grins Y22 Conductor W/ Shield ____1.238 grins _____

0.528 grins Z2_____ 2 Conductor W/ Shield ____1. 832 grins _____

ARSS X&Z Pilot x Vlve ASS X&Z 4.42.2 mils/

PltVle X2 Conductor W/ Shield mils /4.0gq 9 2.2 mils/

Y 2 Conductor W/ Shield 4__.4 mils /4.0 g2. g ARSS X&Z z SASS X&Z 4.4r.2 mils/

Z2 Conductor W/ Shield ____Ils / 4.0 g 120 lecorded for future analysis. Use ilot valve acceptance criteria Actuator X 2 Conductor W/ Shield ____

ýconservative) or update criteria with ng input.

ýecorded for future analysis. Use tiotvatve acceptance criteria Y conservative) or update criteria with 2 Conductor W/ Shield __ _ng input.

ecorded for furure anafysis. Use lot valve acceptance criteria Z conservaiive) or update criteria with 2 Conductor W/ Shield Eng input. _____

X (horiz) 2 Conductor W/ Shield 4.62 gms 2.3 g rms

__________________ Zn axialve) 2 Conductor W/ Shield 4.2 g ris 2.3 g ris ZR(axialt 2 Conductor W/ Shield 6.6 g rms .3g rms

TIC-i 463 Revision 0 Page 44 of 71 ATTACHMENT 9.2: EPU VIBRATION MONITORING DATA SHEET SECTION 3 EPU VIBRATION INSTRUMENTATION LOCATIONS SECTION 3A MAIN STEAM LINE ACCELEROMETER LOCATIONS AND ACCEPTANCE I I Acceptance Location Recorder Criteria (g rms)

Channel Level 1 Level12 0.071 grins 5 3E ERV Inlet Flange X,2 Conductor W/ Shieid ____ 153 grins *___

0.296 grins Y,2 Conductor W/ Shield 0764 grins *____

0.070 grins Z,2 Conductor W/ Shield 0____.146 gris *___

0.071 grins X22 Conductor W/ Shield .153 0.___ grins____

0.296 grins Y22 Conductor W/ Shield 0.764 grins *____

0.070 grins

____Z2_ 2 Conductor W/ Shield 0.146 grins *___

ARSS X&Z SRSS X&Z X

PiotVave .4 mils 2 .2 milsI PltVle X2 Conductor W/ Shield4.g 20q 4.4 mils 2 .2 mils/

Y 2 Conductor W/ Shield - 40g .

SRSSX&Z SRSS X&Z z 4.4 mils / 2.2 mils/

Z2 Conductor W/ Shield4. og Recorded for future anafysis.

Jse pilot valve acceptance Actuaor X ritefla (conservative) or update Actato X2 Conductor W/ Shield ýriteria with Enctinput.

Recorded for future analysis.

Jse pilot valve acceptance 2 odcoY/Sil riteria (conservative) or update 2 Coductr W Shild riteria with Eng input.

Recorded for future anal yais.

Use pilot valve acceptance z criteria (conservative) or update 2 Conductor W/ Shield criteria witn Enoinput.

6 B MVSIV Valve X 2 Conductor W/ Shield .108 grins 0.091 grins 0-___

Stuffing Box Y 2 Conductor W/ Shield 0.082 grins 0.069 grins Z 2 Conductor W/t Shield 0____.135 grins 0.114 grins 7 HPCI MOV Valve X 2 Conductor W1Shield 0-158 grins .134 grin 2 0 4 Acut rY 2 Conductor W/Shield h.o 156 jO.s132 qrs

________________ ________ Z 2 Conductor W/ Shield 0.22___ 6 qms 0192 s

TIC-i 463 Revision 0 Page 45 of 71 ATTACHMENT 9.2: EPU VIBRATION MONITORING DATA SHEET SECTION 3 EPU VIBRATION INSTRUMENTATION LOCATIONS SECTION 3A MAIN STEAM LINE ACCELEROMETER LOCATIONS AND ACCEPTANCE Acceptance Location Recorder Criteria (g rms)

Channel1

_______ ____Level 1 Level2 8 ASB on 4B3 SRV X (horiz) 2 Conductor W/ Shield 4.6 grms ~2.3 qrms Y (vert) 2 Conductor W1 Shield 4.6 g ms 2.3 g rms

_________Z (axial) 2 Conductor W/ Shield 3.2 q rms 1.6 g rms 9 ASB on 4C SRV X (horiz) 2 Conductor W/ Shield g rms 4____.6 ý.3 g rms Y (vert) 2 Conductor W1 Shield 4____.6q rms 2.3 g rms

_________________Z (axial) 2 Conductor W/ Shield 3.2 q rms 1.6 g rms 10 ASB on 4E SRV X (horiz) 2 Conductor W/ Shield 4.6 g rms 2.3 g rms Y (vert) 2 Conductor W/ Shield 4.6 q rms 2.3 g rms

_________Z (axial) 2 Conductor W/ Shield g rms 3_____.2 1.6 g rms 11 ASB3 on 4H SRV X (horiz) 2 Conductor W/ Shield 4.6 g rms 2.3 g rms Y vr) 2 Conductor W/ Shield 4. grm .3q m

______Z (axial) 2 Conductor W1 Shield 32 g rms .1.6 g rms Data recorded Data recorded 12 Min tea X Conuctr W Sheldor future forfuture 12__Main___Steam_____2__Conductor____W1__Shield___analysis analysis Drain Line Data recorded Data recorded Valve Actuator Y 2 Conductor W/ Shield anlyi anlyi (Inboard valve Data recorded Data recorded

'orfuture 'or future

______ 2_-0220-1) z2 Conductor W/ Shield nfsa nalvsis eta recorded Data recorded or future *or lutute 13 MSV #4 X 2 Conductor W1 Shield _________nalyuid iData recorded Data ,ecorded 2 Cnduto W/Shildor futre or future Y 2oodco W hedaf na utu. analysis Data recorded fData recorded

__________________ Z 2 Conductor W/ Shield orlyi futur utur yor

TIC-i 463 Revision 0 Page 46 of 71 ATTACHMENT 9.2: EPU VIBRATION MONITORING DATA SHEET SECTION 3 EPU VIBRATION INSTRUMENTATION LOCATIONS SECTION 3A MAIN STEAM LINE ACCELEROMETER LOCATIONS AND ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA Acceptance Location Recorder Criteria (g rms)

Channel Level 1 Level 2 Data recorded [ata recorded for future for future 14 B MSIV X 2 Conductor W/Shield analysis aayi Actuator Data recorded Data recorded for future for future Y 2 Conductor W/ Shield analysis aayi jData recorded Data recorded for future for future

________________ Z 2 Conductor W/ Shield ýnalysisalyi 84 Ch. conductors 84 Oh.252

TIC-i 463 Revision 0 Page 47 of 71 ATTACHMENT 9.3: MAIN STEAM LINE STRAIN GAGE DATA SHEET At All Test Conditions SECTION 1 DATA GATHERING Test Condition: Power Level (MWt)

Instructions:

NOTE: Main Steam Line Strain Gage (MSL SG) Instrument Sensor Channel locations are identified in Section 3.

If, due to sensor or channel failures, Channel inputs must be altered, then perform pen-and-ink changes to Section 3 and make a clarifying entry into Log 10.2, "Exceptions Index."

1. VERIFY that a set of data was OBTAINED at this Test Condition for the MSL SG instruments.

Verified:__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Data Taker or ASB Test Coordinator

2. At Test Conditions 9, 11, and following 18, VERIFY that the Acceptance Criteria of Section 2 were SATISIFIED or RECONCILED.

Verified: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Data Taker or ASB Test Coordinator

TIC-i1 463 Revision 0 Page 48 of 71 ATTACHMENT 9.3: MAIN STEAM LINE STRAIN GAGE DATA SHEET SECTION 1 DATA GATHERING

3. SIGN Log 10.1, "Evaluation and Completion Signoff," for this Attachment at this Test Condition.

Completed:_______________

Data Taker or ASB Test Coordinator

TIC-i 463 Revision 0 Page 49 of 71 ATTACHMENT 9.3: MAIN STEAM LINE STRAIN GAGE DATA SHEET SECTION 2 ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA Main Steam Line Strain Gage Acceptance Criteria Level 1 Main Steam Line Strain Gages: Data will be gathered at all of the Test Conditions specified in the Main Body of the Temporary Procedure, in order to support future analysis. However, not all Test Conditions have Level 1 Criteria.

For Test Conditions 11 and 18, ENGINEERING shall compare data gathered under this Temporary Procedure to data from the same locations, previously gathered and analyzed.

The comparison for this acceptance criterion will be between the measured strain gages at the current Test Condition to:

1. An envelope of the Unit 1 and Unit 2 of the data gathered at pre-ASB full EPU power level.

The Level 1 Criteria is deemed to have been met if ENGINEERING determines, that for each strain gage that was functional in the identical locations on both during startup from pre-ASB installation and post-ASB installation, that:

1. The overall peak-to-peak (max minus min) strain level obtained at the Test Condition is less than or equal to the peak-to-peak level obtained at the pre-ASB conditions.

2. The frequency domain spectra comparisons show no new peaks greater than the historical pre-ASB measurements. New peaks are defined to be those peaks that are greater than 20% of the maximum amplitude of the dominant peak in the spectra on pre-ASB measurements.

TIC-i1 463 Revision 0 Page 50 of 71 Main Steam Line Strain Gage Acceptance Criteria (Continued)

Level 2 Main Steam Line Strain Gages: Data will be gathered at all of the Test Conditions specified in the Main Body of the Temporary Procedure, in order to support future analysis. However, not all Test Conditions have Level 2 Criteria.

For Test Conditions 9, 11, and following 18, ENGINEERING shall compare data gathered under this Temporary Procedure to data from the same locations, previously. The comparison for this acceptance criterion will be between the measured strains at the current Test Condition to:

1. An envelope of the Unit 1 and Unit 2 of the levels that are the pre-ASB 2511 MWt (OLTP) measurements plus 25% of fhe difference between pre-ASB 2511 MWt (OLTP) measurements and the pre-ASB full EPU measurements.

The Level 2 Criteria is deemed to have been met if ENGINEERING determines, that for each strain gage that was functional in the identical locations on both during startup from pre-ASB installation and post-ASB installation, that:

1. The overall peak-to-peak strain level obtained at the Test Condition is less than or equal to the peak-to-peak level obtained at the pre-ASB conditions

2. The frequency domain spectra comparisons show no new peaks greater than the historical pre-ASB measurements. New peaks are defined to be those peaks that are greater than 20% of the maximum amplitude of the dominant peak in the spectra on pre-ASB measurements.

TIC-I 463 Revision 0 Page 51 of 71 ATTACHMENT 9.3: MAIN STEAM LINE STRAIN GAGE DATA SHEET SECTION 3 MAIN STEAM LINE STRAIN GAGE INSTRUMENTATION LOCATIONS SECTION 3A MAIN STEAM LINE STRAIN GAGE LOCATIONS Acceptance Criteria MSL A MSL B MSL C MSL D Dyel(micro-strain Item Location Peerateon Recorder peak-to-PenetrAto Channel peak)

Level Level Sensor Number 1 2 1 Near 00 SIA 3 Conductor grating El. W/ Shield 651' (Vertical 1800 SiB 3 Conductor Pipe) W/ Shield 450 S2A 3 Conductor W/ Shield 2250 S2B 3 Conductor W/ Shield 900 S3A 3 Conductor W/ Shield 2700 S313 3 Conductor W/ Shield 1350 S4A 3 Conductor W/ Shield 315' S4B 3 Conductor W/ Shield Spare S5 Spare

TIC-i 463 Revision 0 Page 52 of 71 ATTACHMENT 9.3: MAIN STEAM LINE STRAIN GAGE DATA SHEET SECTION 3 MAIN STEAM LINE STRAIN GAGE INSTRUMENTATION LOCATIONS

-SECTION_3A MAIN STEAM LINESTRAIN GAGE LOCATIONS ____

Acceptance Criteria MSL A MSL B MSL C MSL D Dyel(micro-strain Location Peerateio Recorder peak-to-X-105A Channel peak)

Level Level Item Sensor Number 1 2 2 Near 0. S6A 3 Conductor grating El. W1 Shield 651' (Vertical 1800 S613 3 Conductor Pipe) W/ Shield 450 S7A 3 Conductor W/ Shield 2250 S713 3 Conductor W/ Shield 900 S8A 3 Conductor W/ Shield 2700 S813 3 Conductor W/ Shield 1350 S9A 3 Conductor W/ Shield 3150 S913 3 Conductor W1 Shield Spare SlO ____0____ Spare

TIC-i 463 Revision 0 Page 53 of 71 ATTACHMENT 9.3: MAIN STEAM LINE STRAIN GAGE DATA SHEET SECTION 3 MAIN STEAM LINE STRAIN GAGE INSTRUMENTATION LOCATIONS SECTION_3A MAIN STEAM LINESTRAIN GAGE LOCATIONS ____

Acceptance Criteria MSL A MSL B MSL C MSL D Dyel(micro-strain Item Location Penetration Rchannel eak-o X-1 05A Canl -ek Level Level

__ _Sensor Number 1 2 3 Near 00 S11lA 3 Conductor grating El. W/ Shield 651' (Vertical 1800 Si11B 3 Conductor Pipe) _____W/ Shield 450 S12A 3 Conductor W/ Shield 2250 S12B 3 Conductor W/ Shield 900 S13A 3 Conductor W/ Shield 2700 S13B 3 Conductor W1 Shield 1350 S14A 3 Conductor W1 Shield 3150 S14B 3 Conductor W/ Shield Spare S15 Spare

TIC-i 463 Revision 0 Page 54 of 71 ATTACHMENT 9.3: MAIN STEAM LINE STRAIN GAGE DATA SHEET SECTION 3 MAIN STEAM LINE STRAIN GAGE INSTRUMENTATION LOCATIONS SECTION 3A MAIN STEAM LINE STRAIN GAGE LOCATIONS ____

Acceptance Criteria MSL A MSL B MSL C MSL D Dyel(micro-strain Item Location Penetration Recorder peak-to-X-1 05A Channel peak)

Level Level Sensor Number _____1 2 4 Near 0. S16A 3 Conductor grating El. W/ Shield 651' (Vertical 180 S16B 3 Conductor Pipe) W/ Shield 450 S17A 3 Conductor W/ Shield 225' S17B 3 Conductor W/ Shield 9Q0 S18A 3 Conductor W/ Shield 2700 S18B 3 Conductor W/ Shield 1350 S19A 3 Conductor W/ Shield 3150 S19B 3 Conductor W/ Shield Spare _____S20 Spare

TIC-i 463 Revision 0 Page 55 of 71 ATTACHMENT 9.3: MAIN STEAM LINE STRAIN GAGE DATA SHEET SECTION 3 MAIN STEAM LINE STRAIN GAGE INSTRUMENTATION LOCATIONS SECTION 3A MAIN STEAM LINESTRAIN GAGE LOCATIONS ____

Acceptance Criteria MVSL A MVSL B MVSL C MVSL D Dyel(micro-strain Item Location Penetration Rchannel *eak-o X-105A Chne pak Level Level

_____Sensor Number 1 2 5 Near El. 00 S21 A 3 Conductor 622' W/ Shield between 450 Elbows 1800 S21 B3Codcr (40Pipe) W/ Shield 450 S22A 3 Conductor W/ Shield 225' S22B 3 Conductor W/ Shield 900 S23A 3 Conductor W/ Shield 270' S23B 3 Conductor W/ Shield 1350 S24A 3 Conductor W/ Shield 3150 S24B 3 Conductor W/ Shield Spare S25 Spare

TIC-i 463 Revision 0 Page 56 of 71 ATTACHMENT 9.3: MAIN STEAM LINE STRAIN GAGE DATA SHEET SECTION 3 MAIN STEAM LINE STRAIN GAGE INSTRUMENTATION LOCATIONS SECTION 3A MAIN STEAM LINESTRAINGAGE LOCATIONS ____

Acceptance Criteria MVSL A MVSL B MVSL C MVSL D Dyel(micro-strain Item Location Penetration Rchannel eak-o X-1 05A Chne pak Level Level Sensor Number 1 2 6 Near El. 00 S26A 3 Conductor 622' W/ Shield between 450 Elbows 1800 S26B 3 Conductor (450 Pipe) W/ Shield 450 S27A 3 Conductor W/ Shield 2250 S27B 3 Conductor W/ Shield 900, S28A 3 Conductor W/ Shield 2700 S28B 3 Conductor W/ Shield 1350 S29A 3 Conductor W/ Shield 3150 S29B 3 Conductor W1 Shield Spare S30 Spare

TIC-i 463 Revision 0 Page 57 of 71 ATTACHMENT 9.3: MAIN STEAM LINE STRAIN GAGE DATA SHEET SECTION 3 MAIN STEAM LINE STRAIN GAGE INSTRUMENTATION LOCATIONS SECTION 3A MAIN STEAM LINE STRAIN GAGE LOCATIONS Acceptance Criteria MVSL A MVSL B MVSLC MVSL D Dyel(micro-strain Item Location Penetration Rchannel eak-o X-1 05A Chne pak Level Level

______Sensor Number 1 2 7 Near El. 00 S31A 3 Conductor 622' W/ Shield between 450 Elbows 1800 S31 B 3 Conductor (450 Pipe) W/ Shield 450 S32A 3 Conductor W/ Shield 2250 S32B 3 Conductor W/ Shield 9Q0 S33A 3 Conductor W/ Shield 2700 S33B 3 Conductor W/ Shield 1350 S34A 3 Conductor W/ Shield 3150 S34B 3 Conductor W/ Shield Spare S5Spare

TIC-i 463 Revision 0 Page 58 of 71 ATTACHMENT 9.3: MAIN STEAM LINE STRAIN GAGE DATA SHEET SECTION 3 MAIN STEAM LINE STRAIN GAGE INSTRUMENTATION LOCATIONS

_____ SECTION 3A MAIN STEAM LINE STRAINGAGE LOCATIONS ____

Acceptance Criteria MVSL A MSL B MVSL C MVSL D Dyel(micro-strain Itm Location Peerateon Recorder peak-to-X-1 05A Chne pak Level Level

_____Sensor Number 1 2 8 Near El. 00 S36A 3 Conductor 622' W/ Shield between 450 elbows 1800 S36B 3 Conductor (450 Pipe) W/ Shield 45' S37A 3 Conductor W/ Shield 225' S37B 3 Conductor W/ Shield 900 S38A 3 Conductor W/ Shield 2700 S38B 3 Conductor W/ Shield 1350 S39A 3 Conductor W/ Shield 3150 S39B 3 Conductor W/ Shield Spare S40 Spare 64 channels -

256 conductors

TIC-i 463 Revision 0 Page 59 of 71 ATTACHMENT 9.4: EQUIPMENT VIBRATION MONITORING UTILIZING HAND HELD M&TE At Test Conditions 11 and 18:

Record M&TE ID Number:

Test Condition: Power Level (MWt)

Instructions:

1 REQUEST and VERIFY that a set of vibration data was OBTAINED at this Test Condition for the following small-bore lines:

Feedwater Discharge Drain Lines 2-3213A, B, C-3/4" and 2-3218A, B, C-3/4"

Feedwater Suction Relief Valve Lines 2-34132A, B, C-i 1/2"

Feedwater Suction Isolation Bypass Lines 2-3417A, B, C-i1"

" Feedwater Reg Station Vent/Drain Lines 2-3216-3/4", 2-3217-3/4", 2-3225A, B-3/4", and 2-32104-3/4" Verified:

Data Taker or ASB Test Coordinator

TIC-i 463 Revision 0 Page 60 of 71

2. VERIFY that the Acceptance Criteria of NES-MS-03.04, "Small Bore Piping Design for High cycle Fatigue," were SATISIFIED or RECONCILED for these lines.

Verified:________________

Data Taker or ASB Test Coordinator NOTE: Vibration checks will be performed, at both pre-EPU and post-EPU power levels, of the 2202-5 Instrument Rack, the Pressure Controllers mounted on the rack, and the Process Sensing Lines connecting to the Pressure Controllers.

3. REQUEST and VERIFY that a set of vibration data was OBTAINED at this Test Condition for:

2202-5 instrument rack (Reactor Building, el 623'-0", K-12) 0 Pressure Controllers 2-0203-3A, B, C, D, E (mounted on 2202-5 rack)

Sensing Lines 2-02 109AK-1 12"-A, 2-02 1 9AL-1 /2"-A, 2-02 1 9AM-1 /2"-A, 2-02 1 9AN-1 /2"-

A, and 2-021 09AP-1 /2"-A (connected to the Pressure Controllers)

4. If these instrument measurements were taken at Test Condition 11 (2511 MWt),

then VERIFY below as baseline data.

Verified:________________

Data Taker or SD Test Coordinator If these measurements were taken at EPU conditions (greater than 2511 MWt) then VERIFY either

" Vibration has not increased more than 10 % over the baseline, or

An IR was INITIATED to send a Pressure Controller to Power Labs for investigation into any vibration-related degradation.

Verified:________________

Data Taker or SD Test Coordinator

5. SIGN Log 10. 1, "Evaluation and Completion Signoff," for this Attachment at this Test Condition.

Completed:

Data Taker or ASB Test Coordinator

TIC-i 463 Revision 0 Page 61 of 71 ATTACHMENT 9.5 MINIMUM FUNCTIONAL INSTRUMENTATION

1. Main Steam Line Pressure Measurements for Dryer Qualification:

For each steam line, at each measurement location, the following configurations are would constitute the minimum number of strain gages needed to develop steam dryer pressure loads.

a) Two strain gage pairs. Each pair consists of two strain gages located 1800 from each other. Each pair is orientated perpendicular to each other.

b) If two perpendicular pairs are not available, then a minimum of 5 strain gages is required at that location.

If the functioning strain gage measurements or the steam dome reference leg pressure measurements, and the functioning accelerometer measurements confirm that the 135 -

140 Hz and 150 - 160 Hz frequency content has been reduced to background levels, e.g.

less 80% of pre-ASB measurements, and other frequency content has not generated any new peaks, i.e. strains or acceleration levels greater than 20% of the pre-ASB peak levels at the highest measured EPU power level, then the minimum number of strain gages defined above is required at only one location on each steam line.

2. ERV Inlet Flanges for ERV Vent and Drain Line and ASB Qualification:

For each ERV, a minimum of 3 orthogonal accelerometers is required on each ERV inlet flange.

3. Safety Valve ASB Qualification:

For the safety valve ASB with accelerometers installed, one accelerometer per ASB measuring acceleration in the ASB axial direction is required. In addition to the one axial accelerometer, a vertical and horizontal accelerometer on the same steam line is also required.

Alternatively, if the MS line vibration levels are demonstrated to be lower than those from another MS line, then the ASB accelerations from the bounding MS line can be used to demonstrate the adequacy of the safety valve ASB canister on both steam lines and the accelerometers on the MS line with the lower vibration levels are not required.

4. ERV Actuator Qualification:

For ERV Actuator a minimum of 3 orthogonal accelerometers is required between the ERV pilot valve and actuator accelerometer locations.

If actuator-mounted accelerometers are used, the specified acceleration limits are conservative, therefore if not met when using actuator-mounted accelerometers, new acceleration limits must be requested from engineering.

TIC-i 463 Revision 0 Page 62 of 71 ATTACHMENT 9.5 MINIMUM FUNCTIONAL INSTRUMENTATION (Continued)

5. Target Rock Valve Qualification:

For the Target Rock Valve, the accelerometers on the valve inlet flange are not required.

6. Main Steam Line Component Qualification:

For the miscellaneous steam line component qualifications, the accelerometers at the following locations are not required:

" B line MSIV Stuffing Box

" HPCI 2-2301-4 MOV Actuator

" MS Drain Line Valve Actuactor 2-0220-1

" MSV #4 The acceptance criteria defined for the test have been developed for the full number of instruments specified at the start of the test. If instruments are lost during power ascension the specified acceptance criteria may need to be redefined to use input from other instruments. It is not possible to predict the instruments that may be available, it is not possible to determine the revised acceptance criteria in advance.

TIC-i 463 Revision 0 Page 63 of 71 LOG 10.1: EVALUATION AND COMPLETION SIGNOFF Data Sheet Instructions:

1) The top rows are the Power Level Plateaus /Test Conditions where testing is to be performed.

2) The left-hand column is the attachment section of the test.

3) If a box is shaded, then that particular test is not required at that power level.

4) EVALUATE the particular attachment test or data collection.

a) VERIFY all required data has been collected.

b) VERIFY all acceptance criteria have been met or RECONCILED.

5) If all test requirements of the attachment has been met, then INITIAL and DATE the specific box.

6) If there are any Exceptions to the Acceptance Criteria specified in an attachment, then ENTER the exception number from Log 10.2, "Exceptions Index," into the appropriate box for that attachment and COMPLETE the Log 10.2 entry.

7) After any Exceptions have been satisfactorily resolved, then INITIAL and DATE the specific box.

8) After completing all the boxes in a column, then INITIAL and DATE the bottom box in that column.

9) The completion of the bottom box for a particular Test Condition signifies that all Attachments being tracked by Log 10. 1 for that Test Condition have been satisfactorily completed to allow proceeding to the next Test Condition.

TIC-i 463 Revision 0 Page 64 of 71 LOG 10.1: EVALUATION AND COMPLETION SIGNOFF Core 225 517 861 1033 1640 1770 1910 2070 2225 Thermal Power 7.6% 17.50% 29.1% 34.9% 55.5% 59.9% 64.6% 70.0% 75.2%

(MWt ___

Attach. TC 1 TC 2 TC 3 TC:4 TC 5 TC 6 TC:7 TC:8 TC 9 Att. 9.2 EPU Att. 9.3 DAS Att. 9.4 Equip Vib. --

Verified Int/Date_____ ______ ___

TIC-i 463 Revision 0 Page 65 of 71 LOG 10.1: EVALUATION AND COMPLETION SIGNOFF Core 2366 2511 2576 2640 2704 2769 2800 2823 2846 Thermal Power 80.0 % 84.9 % 87.1 % 89.3 % 91.4 % 93.6 % 94.7 % 95.5 % 96.2 %

(MWt)

Attach. TC 10 TC 11 TC 12 TC 13 TC 14 TC 15 TC 16 TC 17 TC 18 Att. 9.2 EPU Att. 9.3 DAS____________

Att. 9.4 Equip ~

Vib.__ _ _ _ _ _

Verified lntlDate_________

TIC-i 463 Revision 0 Page 66 of 71 LOG 10.2: EXCEPTIONS INDEX Instructions:

1) DATA TAKER or RESPONSIBLE SYSTEM ENGINEER shall:

a) ENTER Procedure Step under the appropriate column.

b) ENTER next Exception Number in sequence.

c) ENTER Description of Exception and its resolution and / or impact on plant operations as appropriate. IDENTIFY and ATTACH additional pages as required.

d) SIGN and DATE entry.

e) PHOTOCOPY and ATTACH additional blank pages to the Log, if required.

2) STEAM DRYER TEST COORDINATOR shall REVIEW, SIGN and DATE each entry.

Procedure Exception Exception Description/Resolution Step Number _________________________________

TIC-i 463 Revision 0 Page 67 of 71 LOG 10.2: EXCEPTIONS INDEX I 1 t I

TIC-i 463 Revision 0 Page 68 of 71 LOG 10.2: EXCEPTIONS INDEX

-I I-4 +

t I t I I

F ___ F _________________

TIC-i 463 Revision 0 Page 69 of 71 LOG 10.2: EXCEPTIONS INDEX I

______ I _____ _____________________________________

L

____________________ L__________________

I I

TIC-i 463 Revision 0 Page 70 of 71 LOG 10.2: EXCEPTIONS INDEX

[

+/- 4

-I-

TIC-i 463 Revision 0 Page 71 of 71 LOG 10.2: EXCEPTIONS INDEX

ML070290616

Contents

Text

SUMMARY

9.3. Complete

9.3. Complete

9.3. Complete

9.3. Complete

9.3. Complete

9.3. Complete

SUMMARY

Navigation menu

ML070290616

Text

SUMMARY

9.3. Complete

9.3. Complete

9.3. Complete

9.3. Complete

9.3. Complete

9.3. Complete

SUMMARY

Navigation menu

Search