ML031270615

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
2002 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report, Salem & Hope Creek Generating Stations
ML031270615
Person / Time
Site: Salem, Hope Creek  
(DPR-070, NPF-057)
Issue date: 04/30/2003
From: Salamon G
Public Service Enterprise Group
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
LRN-03-127
Download: ML031270615 (83)


Text

PSEG Nuclear LLC P.O. Box 236, Hancocks Bridge, New Jersey 08038-0236 PSEG Nuclear LLC APR 3 0 2003 LRN-03-1 27 United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 Gentlemen:

2002 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT SALEM AND HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATIONS DOCKET NOS. 50-272, 50-311 AND 50-354 As required by Section 6.9.1.7 of Appendix A to Facility Operating Licenses DPR-70 and DPR-75 for Salem Generating Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2, and Section 6.9.1.6 of Appendix A to Facility Operating License NPF-57 for Hope Creek Generating Station, PSEG Nuclear hereby transmits one copy of the 2002 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report. This report summarizes the results of the radiological environmental surveillance program for 2002 in the vicinity of the Salem and Hope Creek Generating Stations. The result of this program for 2002 was specifically compared to the result of the pre-operational program.

If you have any questions or comments on this transmittal, please contact Michael Mosier at (856) 339-5434.

Sincerely, abor Salamon Nuclear Safety and Licensing Manager Attachment 95-2168 REV. 7/99

Document Control Desk 2

APR 3 0 2003 LRN-03-0127 C

Mr. H. Miller, Administrator - Region I U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406 USNRC Senior Resident Inspector - Salem (X24)

USNRC Senior Resident Inspector - Hope Creek (X24)

Mr. G. Wunder, Project Manager-Hope Creek U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop 08B1 Washington, DC 20555 Mr. R. Fretz, Project Manager - Salem U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop 08B2 Washington, DC 20555 Mr. K. Tosch, Manager IV Bureau of Nuclear Engineering 33 Arctic Parkway - CN415 Trenton, NJ 08625 Mr. K. Kille Delaware Emergency Management Agency 165 Brick Store Landing Road Smyrna, DE 19977

o PSEG RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM For Salem Generating Station, Unit 1: Docket No. 50-272 Salem Generating Station, Unit 2: Docket No. 50-311 Hope Creek Generating Station : Docket No. 50-3 54 2002 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT JANUARY 1 TO DECEMBER 31, 2002 Prepared by PSEG MAPLEWOOD TESTING SERVICES APRIL 2003

RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SALEM & HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATIONS 2002 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT JANUARY 1 TO DECEMBER 31, 2002

TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE

SUMMARY

1 THE RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM...........

3 Objectives......................

Data Interpretation.............

Quality Assurance Program.......

Program Changes.................

Results and Discussion..........

Atmospheric.................

Direct Radiation............

Terrestrial.................

Aquatic.....................

Program Deviations.............

Conclusions.....................

REFERENCES..........................

APPENDIX A -

PROGRAM

SUMMARY

APPENDIX B -

SAMPLE DESIGNATION AND LOCATIs 4

6 6

6........

8 17 28 ONS..................

37 APPENDIX C -

DATA TABLES....................................

45 APPENDIX D -

SUMMARY

OF RESULTS FROM ANALYTICS & ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOCIATES INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAMS.......................................

SYNOPSIS OF LAND USE CENSUS....................

75 83 APPENDIX E i

LIST OF TABLES TABLE NUMBER TABLE DESCRIPTION PAGE

1.

Salem and Hope Creek Generating Stations' Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (Program Overview) 18 LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE NUMBER FIGURE DESCRIPTION PAGE

1.

Gross Beta Activity in Air Particulate 1982 through 2002 (Quarterly).21

2.

Ambient Radiation -

Off-site vs Control Station 1982 through 2002 (Quarterly).22

3.

Iodine-131 Activity in Milk 1982 through 2002 (Quarterly).23

4.

Gross Beta Activity in Surface Water 1982 through 2002 (Quarterly).24 S.

Tritium Activity in Surface Water 1982 through 2002 (Quarterly).25 GA.

Cesium-137 Activity in Aquatic Sediment 1982 through 2002 (Semi-Annual).2-6 6B.

Cobalt-60 Activity in Aquatic Sediment 1982 through 2002 (Semi-Annual).27 ii

SUMMARY

During normal operations of a nuclear power generating station there are releases of small amounts of radioactive material to the environment.

To monitor and determine the effects of these releases a Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) has been established for the environment around Artificial Island where the Salem Generating Stations (SGS) and Hope Creek Generating Station (HCGS) are located.

The results of the REMP are published annually, providing a summary and interpretation of the data collected.

PSEG's Maplewood Testing Services (MTS) has been responsible for the collection and analysis of environmental samples during the period of January 1, 2002, through December 31, 2002, and the results are discussed in this report.

The REMP for SGS/HCGS was conducted in accordance with the SGS and HCGS Technical Specifications/Offsite Dose Calculation Manual.

The Lower Limit of Detection (LLD) values required by the Technical Specifications/ODCM were achieved for this reporting period.

The objectives of the program were also met during this period.

The data collected assists in demonstrating that SGS and HCGS were operated in compliance with Technical Specifications/ODCM.

Most of the radioactive materials noted in this report are normally present in the environment, either naturally, such as potassium-40, or as a result of non-nuclear generating station activity, such as nuclear bomb testing.

Measurements made in the vicinity of SGS/HCGS were compared to background or control measurements and the preoperational REMP study performed before Salem Unit 1 became operational.

Samples of air particulates, -

air iodine, milk, surface, ground and drinking water, vegetables, game, fodder crops, fish, crabs, and sediment were collected and analyzed.

External radiation dose measurements were also made in the vicinity of SGS/HCGS using thermoluminescent dosimeters.

From the results obtained, it can be concluded that the levels and fluctuations of radioactivity in environmental samples were as expected for an estuarine environment.

No unusual radiological characteristics were observed in the environs of SGS/HCGS during this reporting period.

Since these results were comparable to the results obtained during the preoperational phase of the program, and with historical results collected since commercial operation, we can conclude that the operation of SGS and HCGS had no significant impact on the radiological characteristics of the environs of these stations.

To demonstrate compliance with Technical Specifications/ODCM (Sections 3/4.12.1 & 6.8.4.h -1,2,3), samples were analyzed for one or more of the following: gamma emitting isotopes, tritium (H-3), iodine-131 (I-131), gross beta and gross alpha.

1

The results of these analyses were used to assess the environmental impact of SGS and HCGS operations, thereby demonstrating compliance with Technical Specifications/ODCM (Section 3/4.11) and applicable Federal and State regulations, and to verify the adequacy of radioactive effluent control systems.

The results provided in this report are summarized below:

  • There were a total of 1170 analyses on 1143 environmental samples during 2002.

Direct radiation dose measurements were made using 196 thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs).

  • In addition to the detection of naturally-occurring isotopes (i.e. Be-7, K-40, Ra-226 and Th-232) trace levels of Co-60 and Cs-137 were also detected.

The concentrations of these nuclides were well below the Technical Specification reporting limit.

  • Dose measurements made with quarterly TLDs at 31 offsite locations around the SGS/HCGS site, averaged 47 millirems for the year 2002.

The average dose measurements at the control locations (background) was 51 millirems for the year.

This was comparable to the preoperational phase of the program which had an average of 55 millirems per year for 1973 to 1976.

2

THE RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM Lower Alloways Creek Township, Salem County, New Jersey is the site of Salem (SGS)and Hope Creek (HCGS) Generating Stations.

SGS consists of two operating pressurized water nuclear power reactors.

Salem Unit One has a net rating of 1133 megawatt electric(MWe) and Salem Unit Two has a net rating of 1134 MWe.

The licensed core power for both units is 3459 megawatt thermal (MWt).

HCGS is a boiling water nuclear power reactor, which has a net rating of 1091 MWe (3339 MWt).

SGS/HCGS are located on a man-made peninsula on the east bank of the Delaware River.

It was created by the deposition of hydraulic fill from dredging operations.

The environment surrounding SGS/HCGS is characterized mainly by the Delaware River and Bay, extensive tidal marshlands, and low-lying meadowlands.

These land types make up approximately 85% of the land area within five miles of the site.

Most of the remaining land is used for agriculture [1,21.

More specific information on the demography, hydrology, meteorology, and land use of the area may be found in the Environmental Reports

[1,2], Environmental Statements [3,4], and the Updated Final Safety Analysis Reports for SGS and HCGS [5,6].

Since 1968, a radiological environmental monitoring program (REMP) has been conducted at the SGS/HCGS Site.

Starting in December, 1972, more extensive radiological monitoring programs were initiated.

The operational REMP was initiated in December, 1976, when Salem Unit 1 achieved criticality.

PSEG's Maplewood Testing Services (MTS) has been involved in the REMP since its inception.

MTS is responsible for the collection of all radiological e

environmental samples and, from 1973 through June, 1983, conducted a quality assurance program in which duplicates of a portion of those samples analyzed by the primary laboratory were also analyzed by MTS.

From January, 1973, through June, 1983, Radiation Management Corporation (RMC) had primary responsibility for the analysis of all samples under the SGS/HCGS REMP and annual reporting of results. RMC reports for the preoperational and operational phase of the program are referenced in this report [7-9].

On July 1, 1983, MTS assumed primary responsibility for the analysis of all samples (except TLDs) and the reporting of results.

Teledyne Brown Engineering Environmental Services (TBE), assumed responsibility for third-party QA analyses and TLDs. An additional vendor, Controls for Environmental Pollution Inc. (CEP), was retained to provide third-party QA analyses and certain non-routine analyses from May, 1988, until June 1, 1992.

Currently, Framatome ANP DE&S Environmental Laboratory (Framatome) is the third party QA vendor and the laboratory which performs the TLD analyses.

MTS reports for the operational phase from 1983 to 2001 are referenced in this report

[10]-

3

An overview of the 2002 Program is provided in Table 1.

Radioanalytical data from samples collected under this program were compared with results from the preoperational phase.

Differences between these periods were examined statistically to determine the effects of station operations.

This report presents the results from January 1 through December 31, 2002, for the SGS/HCGS REMP.

OBJECTIVES The objectives of the Operational REMP are:

  • To fulfill the requirements of the Radiological Surveillance sections of the Technical Specifications/ODCM for SGS/HCGS.
  • To determine whether any significant increase occurred in the concentration of radionuclides in critical pathways.
  • To determine if SGS or HCGS has caused an increase in the radioactive inventory of long-lived radionuclides.
  • To detect any change in ambient gamma radiation levels.
  • To verify that SGS and HCGS operations have no detrimental effects on the health and safety of the public or on the environment.

This report, as required by Section 6.9.1.7 of the Salem Technical Specifications/ODCM and Section 6.9.1.6 of the Hope Creek Technical Specifications/ODCM, summarizes the findings of the 2002 REMP.

Results of the four-year preoperational program have been summarized for comparison with subsequent operational reports [8]

In order to meet the objectives, an operational REMP was developed.

Samples of various media were selected for monitoring due to the radiological dose impact to human and other organisms.

The selection of samples was based on: (1), established critical pathways for the transfer of radionuclides through the environment to man, and, (2), experience gained during the preoperational phase.

Sampling locations were determined based on site meteorology, Delaware estuarine hydrology, local demography, and land uses.

Sampling locations were divided into two classes, indicator and control.

Indicator stations are those, which are expected to manifest station effects. Control samples are collected at locations which are believed to be unaffected by station operations, usually at 15 to 30 kilometers distance.

Fluctuations in the levels of radionuclides and direct radiation at indicator stations are evaluated with respect to analogous fluctuations at control stations.

Indicator and control station data are also evaluated relative to preoperational data.

Appendix A describes and summarizes, in accordance with Section 6.9.1.7 of the Salem TS and Section 6.9.1.6 of the Hope Creek TS, the operational program as performed in 2002.

4

Appendix B describes the coding system which identifies sample type and location.

Table B-1 lists the sampling stations and the types of samples collected at each station.

These sampling stations are indicated on Maps B-1 and B-2.

DATA INTERPRETATION Results of analyses are grouped according to sample type and presented in Appendix C.

All results above the Lower Limit of Detection (LLD) are at a confidence level of 2 sigma.

This represents the range of values into which 95% of repeated analyses of the same sample should fall.

As defined in Regulatory Guide 4.8, LLD is the smallest concentration of radioactive material in a sample that will yield a net count (above system background) that will be detected with 95% probability, with only 5% probability of falsely concluding that a blank observation represents a "real signal".

LLD is normally calculated as 4.66 times the standard deviation of the background counting rate, or of the blank sample count, as appropriate, divided by counting efficiency, sample size, 2.22 (dpm per picocurie), the radiochemical yield when applicable, the radioactive decay constant and the elapsed time between sample collection and time of counting.

The Minimum Detectable Concentration (MDC) is defined as the smallest concentration of radioactive material that can be detected at a given confidence level.

The MDC differs from the LLD in that the MDC takes into consideration the interference caused by the presence of other nuclides while the LLD does not.

The grouped data were averaged and standard deviations calculated in accordance with Appendix B of Reference 16.

Thus, the 2 sigma deviations of the averaged data represent sample and not analytical variability.

For reporting and calculation of averages, anysresult occurring at or below the LLD is considered to be at that level.

When a group of data was composed of 50% or more LLD values, averages were not calculated.

Grab sampling is a useful and acceptable procedure for taking environmental samples of a medium in which the concentration of radionuclides is expected to vary slowly with time or where intermittent sampling is deemed sufficient to establish the radiological characteristics of the medium.

This method, however, is only representative of the sampled medium for that specific location and instant of time.

As a result, variation in the radionuclide concentrations of the samples will normally occur.

Since these variations will tend to counterbalance one another, averages based upon repetitive grab samples is considered valid.

QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MTS has a quality assurance program designed to ensure confidence in the analytical program.

Approximately 20% of the total analytical effort is spent on quality control, including process quality 5

control, instrument quality control, interlaboratory cross-check analyses, and data review.

The quality of the results obtained by MTS is ensured by the implementation of the Quality Assurance Program as described in the Maplewood Testing Services Quality Assurance Plan [11] and the Environmental and Chemical Division Procedures Manual.

The internal quality control activity of MTS includes the quality control of instrumentation, equipment and reagents; the use of reference standards in calibration, documentation of established procedures and computer programs, and analysis of duplicate samples. The external quality control activity is implemented through participation in both the Analytics and the Environmental Resource Associates Interlaboratory Comparison Programs.

The results of these Interlaboratory Comparison Programs ate listed in Tables D-1 through D-4 in Appendix D.

PROGRAM CHANGES Two of our milk farms were replaced in 2002 when their owners decided to leave the dairy business.

In May, location 11F3 was replaced by 13E3 and in October, location 2F9 was replaced by 2G3.

One of our TLD locations, 9E1, was relocated to 9F1 due to road closures in the area.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The analytical results of the 2002 REMP samples are divided into categories based on exposure pathways: atmospheric, direct, terrestrial, and aquatic.

The analytical results for the 2002 REMP are summarized in Appendix A. The data for individual samples are presented in Appendix C. The data collected demonstrates that the SGS and HCGS REMP was conducted in compliance with the Technical Specifications/ODCM.

The REMP for the SGS/HCGS Site has historically included samples and analyses not specifically required by these Stations' Technical Specifications/ODCM.

MTS continues to collect and analyze some of these samples in order to maintain personnel proficiency in performing these non-routine analyses.

These analyses are referenced throughout the report as Management Audit samples.

The summary tables in this report include these additional samples and analyses.

ATMOSPHERIC Air particulates were collected on Schleicher-Schuell No. 25 glass fiber filters with low-volume air samplers.

Iodine was collected from the air by adsorption on triethylenediamine (TEDA) impregnated charcoal cartridges connected in series after the air particulate filters. Air sample volumes were measured with calibrated dry-gas meters and were corrected to standard temperature and pressure.

6

Air Particulates (Tables C-1, C-2)

Air particulate samples were collected weekly, at 6 locations.

Each of the 311 samples collected for the year were analyzed for gross beta.

Quarterly composites of the weekly samples from each station were analyzed for specific gamma emitters.

Total data recovery for the 6 sampling stations in 2002 was 99.69 percent.

Gross beta activity was detected in 259 of the indicator station samples at concentrations ranging from 12 x 10-3 to 40 x 10-3 pCi/M3 and in all of the control station samples from 14 x 10-3 to 47 x 10-3 pCi/M 3.

The averages for the indicator and control station samples were 23 and 25 x 10-3 pCi/M3, respectively.

The maximum preoperational level detected was 920 x 10-3 pCi/m3, with an average of 74 x 10- pCi/m3.

Results from 1982 to current year are plotted on Figure 1 as quarterly averages.

Included along with this plot, for purposes of comparison, is an inset depicting a continuation of this plot from the current year all the way back to 1973.

Gamma spectroscopy, performed on each of the 24 quarterly composite samples analyzed, indicated the presence of the naturally-occurring radionuclides Be-7 and K-40.

All other gamma emitters searched for were below the LLD.

o Beryllium-7, attributed to cosmic ray activity in the atmosphere, was detected in all 20 indicator station composites that were analyzed, at concentrations ranging from 43 x 10-3 to 76 x 10-3 pCi/M 3, with an average of 60 X 10-3 pCi/M 3.

It was detected in the 4 control station composites ranging from 45 x 10-3 to 70 x 10-3 pCi/M3, with an average of 60 x 10-3 pCi/m3.

The maximum preoperational level detected was 330 x 10-3 pCi/M3, with an average of 109 x 103 pCi/M3.

o Potassium-40 activity was detected in 9 of the indicator station samples, with concentrations ranging from 8 x 10-3 to 13 x 103 pCi/M3, with an average of 10 x 10-3 pCi/M3.

K-40 was also detected in 1 control station sample, at a concentration of 8 x 10-3 pCi/M3.

No preoperational data is available for comparison.

Air Iodine (Table C-3)

Iodine in filtered air samples was collected weekly, at 6 locations.

Each of the 311 samples collected for the year was analyzed for I-131.

Iodine-131 was not detected in any of the weekly samples analyzed.

LLD sensitivities for all the stations, both indicator and control, ranged from <0.8 x 10-3 to <9.7 x 10-3 pCi/m 3.

The maximum preoperational level detected was 42 x 10-3 pCi/M 3.

7

DIRECT RADIATION Ambient radiation levels in the environs were measured with energy-compensated CaSO4 (Ti) thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) supplied and read by Framatome. Packets containing TLDs for quarterly exposure were placed in the owner-controlled area and around the Site at various distances.

Direct Radiation (Table C-4)

A total of 49 locations were monitored for direct radiation during 2002, including 12 on-site locations, 31 off-site locations within the 10 mile zone, and 6 control locations beyond 10 miles.

Effort was made to locate TLDs at schools and population centers in the area.

Five readings for each TLD (ie; 5 elements) at each location were taken in order to obtain a more statistically valid result.

For these measurements, the rad is considered equivalent to the rem, in accordance with 10CFR20.1004.

The average dose rate for the 31 quarterly off-site indicator TLDs was 3.9 millirads per standard month, while the on-site average was 4.1 millirads per standard month.

The average control rate was 4.3 millirads per standard month.

The preoperational average for the quarterly TLD readings was 4.4 millirads per standard month.

In Figure 2, the quarterly average radiation levels of the off-site indicator stations versus the control stations, are plotted for the period 1982 through 2002, with an inset graph depicting the current year back to 1973.

TERRESTRIAL Milk samples were taken semi-monthly when cows were on pasture and monthly when cows were not grazing on open pasture.

Animals are considered on pasture from April to November of each year.

Samples were collected in polyethylene containers and transported in ice chests with no preservatives added to the milk.

A well water sample was collected monthly.

Separate raw and treated potable water samples were composited daily at the City of Salem water treatment plant.

All samples were collected in new polyethylene containers.

Locally grown vegetable and fodder crops were collected at the time of harvest.

Such samples were weighed and packed in plastic bags.

Game (muskrat) has been collected annually (time of year dependent on weather conditions, which affect pelt thickness) from local farms after being trapped, stripped of their pelts and gutted.

The carcasses were packed in plastic bags and kept chilled in ice chests during transport.

8

Milk (Table C-5)

Milk samples were collected at 4 local dairy farms (2 farms in NJ and 2 in Delaware).

Each sample was analyzed for I-131 and gamma emitters.

Iodine-131 was not detected in any of the 80 samples analyzed.

LLD sensitivities for both the indicator and the control station samples ranged from <0.2 to <0.4 pCi/L.

The maximum preoperational level detected was 65 pCi/L which occurred following a period of atmospheric nuclear weapons tests.

Results from 1982 to 2002 are plotted on Figure 3, with an inset graph depicting the current year back to 1973.

Gamma spectroscopy performed on each of the 80 samples indicated the presence of the naturally-occurring radionuclide K-40.

All other gamma emitters searched for were below the LLD.

0 Potassium-40 was detected in all 80 samples.

Concentrations for the 60 indicator station samples ranged from 1010 to 1470 pCi/L, with an average of 1350 pCi/L.

The 20 control station sample concentrations ranged from 1170 to 1440 pCi/L, with an average of 1340 pCi/L.

The maximum preoperational level detected was 2000 pCi/L, with an average of 1437 pCi/L.

Well Water (Ground Water) (Tables C-6, C-7)

Although wells in the vicinity of SGS/HCGS are not directly affected by plant operations, water samples were collected monthly from one farm's well during January through December of the year.

Each sample was analyzed for gross alpha, gross beta, tritium, and gamma emitters.

Gross alpha activity was detected in 9 of the well water samples at concentrations ranging from 1.5 to 3.0 pCi/L and an average of 2.1 pCi/L.

The maximum preoperational level detected was 9.6 pCi/L.

There was no preoperational average determined for this analysis.

Gross beta activity was detected in all 12 well water samples.

Concentrations for the samples ranged from 10 to 13 pCi/L, with an average of 11 pCi/L.

The 2002 gross beta results are comparable with the preoperational results which ranged from

<2.1 to 38 pCi/L, with an average value of 9 pCi/L.

Tritium activity was not detected in any of the well water samples.

The LLD sensitivities ranged from <150 to <180 pCi/L.

The maximum preoperational level detected was 380 pCi/L.

9

Gamma spectroscopy performed on each of the 12 well water samples indicated the presence of the naturally-occurring radionuclides K-40 and Radium.

All other gamma emitters searched for were below the LLD.

o Radium was detected in all 12 of the well water samples at concentrations ranging from 40 to 176 pCi/L with an average of 112 pCi/L.

The maximum preoperational level detected was 2.0 pCi/L.

These values are similar to those found in the past 12 years.

However, as with the 1989 through 2001 results, they

-are higher than those found in the preoperational program.

The results are most likely due to a procedural change for sample preparation.

The change results in less removal of radon (and its daughter products) from the sample.

It is reasonable to conclude that values currently observed are typical for this region.

O Potassium-40 was detected in 4 of the samples at concen-trations ranging from 43 to 58 pCi/L and an average of 51 pCi/L.

The maximum preoperational level detected was 30 pCi/L.

Potable Water (Drinking Water) (Tables C-8, C-9)

Both raw and treated potable water samples were collected and composited by Salem water treatment plant personnel.

Each sample consisted of daily aliquots composited into a monthly sample.

The raw water source for this plant is Laurel Lake and adjacent wells.

Each of the 24 individual samples was analyzed for gross alpha, gross beta, tritium, iodine-131 and gamma emitters.

Gross alpha activity was detected in 10 raw water samples at concentrations of 0.8 to 2.0 pCi/L and in 7 treated water samples ranging from 0.9 to 1.6 pCi/L.

The averages for both raw and treated water samples was 1.1 pCi/L.

The maximum pre-operational level detected was 2.7 pCi/L.

Gross beta activity was detected in all 24 samples at concentrations ranging from 2.6 to 4.9 pCi/L for both the raw and treated water.

The average concentration for both raw and treated was 3.4 pCi/L.

The maximum preoperational level detected was 9.0 pCi/L, with an average of 4.2 pCi/L.

Tritium activity was not detected in any of the raw or treated water samples.

LLD sensitivities ranged from <150 to <180 pCi/L.

The maximum preoperational level detected was 350 pCi/L, with an average of 179 pCi/L.

10

Iodine-131 measurements were performed to a sensitivity of 1.0 pCi/L even though the drinking water supplies are not affected by discharges from the site since the receiving water body (Delaware River) is brackish and therefore the water is not used for human consumption.

Iodine-131 measurements for all 24 samples were below the LLD sensitivities.

These sensitivities ranged from <0.2 to <0.4 pCi/L.

Gamma spectroscopy performed on each of the 24 monthly water samples indicated the presence of the naturally-occurring radionuclides K-40 and Radium.

All other gamma emitters searched for were below the LLD.

O The radionuclide K-40 was detected in 8 of the raw and treated potable waters at concentrations ranging from 44 to 65 pCi/L.

The combined average for both raw and treated positive results was 52 pCi/L.

There was no preoperational data available for comparison.

o Radium was detected in one potable raw and 3 of the treated samples at concentrations of 5 to 42 pCi/L. LLD sensitivities for the remaining raw and treated waters ranged from <2 to <6 pCi/L. The maximum preoperational level detected was 1.4 pCi/L.

The higher results in the two measurable samples are most likely due to the procedural change for sample preparation, as discussed in the Well Water section.

Vegetables (Table C-10)

Although vegetables in the region are not irrigated with water into which liquid plant effluents have been discharged, a variety of food products grown in the area for human consumption were sampled at 5 indicator stations (12 samples) and 5 control stations (14 samples)

The vegetables collected as management audit samples were analyzed for gamma emitters and included asparagus, cabbage, sweet corn, peppers and tomatoes.

Gamma spectroscopy performed on each of the 26 samples indicated the presence of the naturally-occurring radionuclides K-40 and Radium.

All other gamma emitters searched for were below the LLD.

Potassium-40 was detected in all 26 samples.

Concentrations for the 12 indicator station samples ranged from 1620 to 3030 pCi/kg-wet and averaged 2350 pCi/kg-wet.

Concentrations for the 14 control station samples ranged from 1320 to 2550 pCi/kg-wet, and averaged 2050 pCi/kg-wet.

The average concentration detected for all samples, both indicator and control, was 2190 pCi/kg-wet.

The maximum preoperational level detected was 4800 pCi/kg-wet, with an average of 2140 pCi/kg-wet.

11

Radium was detected in one control sample (asparagus) at a concentration of 38 pCi/kg-wet.

It was not detected in any of the indicator station samples.

No preoperational data is available for comparison.

Game (Table C-li)

Although not required by the SGS or HCGS Technical Specifications/ODCM, samples of muskrats inhabiting the marshlands surrounding the Site, are collected.

This game is consumed by local residents.

The samples, when available, are collected from 2 locations once a year as management audit samples and analyzed for gamma emitters.

Gamma spectroscopy performed on the flesh indicated the presence of the naturally-occurring radionuclide K-40.

All other gamma emitters searched for were below the LLD.

Potassium-40 was detected in the indicator station sample at a concentration of 3240 pCi/kg-wet and the control station sample at 2580 pCi/kg-wet.

The average for both muskrat samples was 2910 pCi/kg-wet.

The maximum preoperational level detected was 27000 pCi/kg-wet, with an average of 4400 pCi/kg-wet.

Fodder Crops (Table C-12)

Although not required by the SGS or HCGS Technical Specifications/ODCM, 6 samples of crops normally used as cattle feed (silage and soybeans) were collected from 3 indicator stations (4 samples) and one control station (2 samples).

It was determined that these products may be a significant element in the food-chain pathway.

Fodder crops are collected as management audit samples and analyzed for gamma emitters.

All of the locations from which samples were collected this year are milk sampling stations.

Gamma spectroscopy performed on each of the 6 samples indicated the presence of the naturally-occurring radionuclides Be-7, K-40 and Radium.

All other gamma emitters searched for were below the LLD.

Beryllium-7, attributed to cosmic ray activity in the atmosphere, was detected in 2 indicator silage samples at concentrations of 140 and 340 pCi/kg-wet. It was detected in the control station silage sample at 390 pCi/kg-wet.

The average for all the positive silage samples was 290 pCi/kg-wet.

The maximum preoperational level detected for silage was 4700 pCi/kg-wet, with an average of 2000 pCi/kg-wet.

Be-7 was not detected in either of the two soybean samples.

LLD sensitivities for the soybean samples were <23 and <46 pCi/kg-wet.

The maximum preoperational level detected for soybean samples was 9300 pCi/kg-dry.

12

Potassium-40 was detected in all 6 samples.

Concentrations for the 4 indicator station samples ranged from 2630 to 14800 pCi/kg-wet and for the 2 control station samples at 9780 and 14600 pCi/kg-wet.

The average concentration detected for the silage samples (both indicator and control) was 7790 pCi/kg-wet.

Preoperational results averaged 7000 pci/kg-wet.

Results for the soybean samples (both indicator and control) averaged 14400 pCi/kg-wet which is comparable to preoperational studies when the average wet/dry factor of 1.2 is used.

Preoperational soybean results averaged 22000 pCi/kg-dry.

AQUATIC All aquatic samples (with the exception of 6S2 shoreline sediment) were collected by Environmental Consulting Services, Inc (ECS).

Surface water samples were collected in new polyethylene containers that were rinsed twice with the sample medium prior to collection.

Edible fish and crabs are taken by net and then processed.

In processing, the flesh is separated from the bone and shell and placed in sealed polyethylene containers and frozen before being transported in ice chests.

Sediment samples collected by ECS were taken with a bottom grab sampler and frozen in sealed polyethylene containers before being transported in ice chests.

MTS personnel collect location 6S2 shoreline sediment on the beach behind the observation building.

Surface Water (Tables C-13, C-14, C-15)

Surface water samples were collected monthly at 4 indicator stations and one control station in the Delaware estuary.

One location is at the outfall area (which is the area where liquid radioactive effluents from the Salem Station are allowed to be -

discharged into the Delaware River), another is downstream from the outfall area, and another is directly west of the outfall area at the mouth of the Appoquinimink River.

Two upstream locations are in the Delaware River and at the mouth of the Chesapeake and Delaware Canal, the latter being sampled when the flow is from the Canal into the river.

Station 12C1, at the mouth of the Appoquinimink River, serves as the operational control.

All surface water samples were analyzed monthly for gross beta and gamma emitters.

Quarterly composites were analyzed for tritium.

  • Gross beta activity was detected in all 48 of the indicator station samples ranging from 6 to 168 pCi/L, with an average of 78 pCi/L.

Beta activity was detected in all 12 of the control station samples with concentrations ranging from 25 to 156 pCi/L, with an average of 76 pCi/L.

The maximum preoperational level detected was 110 pCi/L, with an average of 32 pCi/L.

13

Quarterly results for all locations are plotted on Figure 4, for the years 1982 to 2002, with an inset graph depicting the current year back to 1973.

Tritium activity was not detected in any of the control station composites and in only one of the indicator station composites at a concentration of 197 pCi/L.

LLD sensitivities for the remaining station composites, both indicator and control, ranged from <160 to <200 pCi/L.

The maximum preoperational level detected was 600 pCi/L, with an average of 210 pCi/L.

Positive results from 1982 to 2002 are plotted on Figure 5, with an inset graph depicting the current year back to 1973.

Gamma spectroscopy performed on each of the 48 indicator station and 12 control station surface water samples indicated the presence of the naturally-occurring radionuclide K-40.

All other gamma emitters searched for were below the LLD.

Potassium-40 was detected in 43 samples from the indicator stations at concentrations ranging from 52 to 200 pCi/L and in 11 of the control station samples ranging from 46 to 141 pCi/L.

The average for the indicator station locations was 112 pCi/L, while the average for the control station locations was 91 pCi/L.

The maximum preoperational level detected was 200 pCi/L, with an average of 48 pCi/L.

Fish (Table C-16)

Edible species of fish were collected semi-annually at 3 locations and analyzed for gamma emitters in flesh.

Samples included catfish, weakfish, white perch and striped bass.

Gamma spectroscopy performed on each of the 4 indicator station samples and 2 control station samples indicated the presence of the naturally-occurring radionuclide K-40.

All other gamma emitters searched for were below the LLD.

O Potassium-40 was detected in all 4 samples from the indicator stations at concentrations ranging from 3190 to 3980 pCi/kg-wet for an average of 3540 pCi/kg-wet.

K-40 was detected in both samples from the control location at 3630 and 4020 pCi/kg-wet.

The average for the control samples was 3825 pCi/kg-wet.

The maximum preoperational level detected was 13000 pCi/kg-wet, with an average of 2900 pCi/kg-wet.

Blue Crab (Table C-17)

Blue crab samples were collected once during the season at 2 locations, 1 indicator and 1 control, and the edible portions were analyzed for gamma emitters.

14

Gamma spectroscopy performed on the flesh of the indicator station sample and the control station sample indicated the presence of the naturally-occurring radionuclide K-40. All other gamma emitters searched for were below the LLD.

Potassium-40 was detected in the indicator station sample at a concentration of 3050 pCi/kg-wet and in the control station sample at 3010 pCi/kg-wet.

The average for both the indicator and control station samples was 3030 pCi/kg-wet.

The maximum preoperational level detected was 12000 pCi/kg-wet, with an average of 2835 pCi/kg-wet.

Sediment, (Table C-18)

Sediment samples were collected semi-annually from 7 locations, including 6 indicator stations and 1 control station. (Location 6S2 is the only shoreline sediment and it is directly affected by tidal fluctuations)

Each of the 14 samples was analyzed for gamma emitters.

Although trace levels of man-made nuclides were detected in some sediment samples, these levels were expected and well within the acceptable levels specified in section 3/4.12.1 of the Technical Specifications/ODCM.

Gamma spectroscopy was performed on each of the 12 indicator station samples and 2 control station samples.

In addition to the detection of the naturally-occurring radionuclides Radium, K-40, Be-7 and Th-232, low levels of Co-60 and Cs-137 were also detected.

All other gamma emitters searched for were below the LLD.

Cesium-137 was detected in 9 indicator station samples at concentrations ranging from 8 to 110 pCi/kg-dry with an average of 58 pCi/kg-dry.

It was not detected in either of the control station samples.

The maximum preoperational level detected was 400 pCi/kg-dry with an average of 150 pCi/kg-dry.

Results from 1982 to 2002 are plotted on Figure 6A, with an inset graph depicting the current year back to 1973.

Cobalt-60 was detected in one of the indicator station samples at a concentration of 53 pCi/kg-dry.

It was not detected in either of the control station samples.

LLD sensitivities for the remaining 13 samples, indicator and control, ranged from <4 to

<51 pCi/kg-dry.

Results of all the positive values from 1982 to 2002 are plotted on Figure 6B, with an inset graph depicting the current year back to 1973.

Potassium-40 was detected in all 12 indicator station samples at concentrations ranging from 1310 to 16800 pCi/kg-dry, with an average of 12020 pCi/kg-dry.

Concentrations detected in both of the control station samples were at 10200 and 13700 pCi/kg-dry.

The average for both the indicator and control station samples was 12000 pCi/kg-dry. The maximum preoperational level detected was 21000 pCi/kg-dry, with an average of 15000 pCi/kg-dry.

15

Radium was detected in all 12 indicator station samples at con-centrations ranging from 80 to 800 pCi/kg-dry, with an average of 530 pCi/kg-dry.

Concentrations detected in both of the control station samples were at 590 and 790 pCi/kg-dry, with an average of 690 pCi/kg-dry.

The grand average for both the indicator and control station samples was 550 pCi/kg-dry.

The maximum pre-operational level detected was 1200 pCi/kg-dry, with an average of 760 pCi/kg-dry.

Thorium-232 was detected in all 12 indicator station samples at concentrations ranging from 90 to 1130 pCi/kg-dry, with an average of 810 pCi/kg-dry.

Concentrations detected in both of the control station samples were at 800 and 930 pCi/kg-dry, with an average of 860 pCi/kg-dry.

The gr§and average for both the indicator and control station samples was 820 pCi/kg-dry.

The maximum pre-operational level detected was 1300 pCi/kg-dry, with an average of 840 pCi/kg-dry.

Beryllium-7 was detected in one of the indicator station samples at a concentration of 1640 pCi/kg-dry.

It was not detected in any of the control station samples.

The LLD sensitivities for the remaining samples, both indicator and control, ranged from

<60 to <670 pCi/kg-dry.

The maximum preoperational level detected was 2300 pCi/kg-dry.

16

PROGRAM DEVIATIONS The following air sampler was unavailable due to equipment malfunction:

STATION LOCATION HOURS UNAVAILABLE 1F1 5.8 mi., N of vent 118.9 (1.38%)

This outage was attributable to broken carbon vanes in the sampler vacuum pump. To ensure that this outage would not happen to another location, all air samplers were pulled on a weekly schedule and carbon vanes in all the air sampler vacuum pumps were replaced as a precautionary measure.

The TLDS from locations 2S2 and 16G1 were lost during the 3rd quarter, 2002.

The utility poles that the TLDs had been stapled to were removed and disposed of with the TLDS not recovered.

In both cases, inquiries were made but it was stated that the TLDS had not been noticeable to the contractors removing the poles.

To prevent a reoccurrence, laminated signs were placed on the poles containing our TLDS with "Environmental Radiological Monitoring Samples in Progress" with contact names and phone numbers to notify MTS in the event a pole needs to be replaced.

CONCLUSIONS The Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program for Salem and Hope Creek Generating Stations was conducted during 2002 in accordance with the SGS and HCGS Technical Specifications/ODCM.

The LLD values required by the Technical Specifications/ODCM were achieved for this reporting period.

The objectives of the program were also met during this period.

The data collected assists in demonstrating that SGS and HCGS were operated in compliance with Technical Specifications/ODCM.

From the results obtained, it can be concluded that the levels and fluctuations of radioactivity in environmental samples were as expected for an estuarine environment.

No unusual radiological characteristics were observed in the environs of SGS/HCGS during this reporting period.

Since these results were comparable to the results obtained during the preoperational phase of the program, which ran from 1973 to 1976, and with historical results collected since commercial operation, we can conclude that the operation of the Salem and Hope Creek Stations had no significant impact on the radiological characteristics of the environs of that area.

17

TABLE 1 SALEM AND HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATIONS RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM (PROGRAM OVERVIEW)

STATION CODE COLLECTION MEDIUM INDICATOR CONTROL FREQUENCY TYPE/FREQUENCY* OF ANALYSIS I.

ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT

a. Air Particulate
b. Air Iodine SS1 5D1 16E1 IFI 2F6 5S1 5D1 16E1 IF. 2F6 14G1 14G1 Weekly Gross beta/weekly Gamma scan/quarterly Weekly Iodine-131/weekly 00 II. DIRECT RADIATION
a. Thermoluminescent Dosimeters iSl 2S2 5S1 6S2 7S.

10S1 liSl 4D2 11E2 16F2 13F3 2S4 5D1 10DI 14D1 15S1 16E1 7F2 9E1 15D1 10F2 14F2 3S1 2E1 3E1 13E1 16S1 SF1 llFI 2F5 12E1 12F1 15F3 4S1 lFl 2F2 2F6 4F2 6Fl 13F4 3F2 3F3 13F2 9F1 3G1 1G3 10GI 16G1 14G1 3H1 Quarterly Monthly (when animals are on pasture)

Semi-monthly (when animals are not on pasture)

Gamma dose/ quarterly Iodine-131/monthly Gamma scan/monthly Iodine-131/semi -monthly Gamma scan/semi-monthly III. Terrestrial Environment

a. Milk 2F9 11F3 14F4 3G1 13E3 2G3

TABLE 1 (cont'd)

SALEM AND HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATIONS RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM (PROGRAM OVERVIEW)

STATION CODE COLLECTION MEDIUM INDICATOR CONTROL FREQUENCY TYPE/FREQUENCY*

OF ANALYSIS

b.

Well Water 3E1 Monthly Gross alpha/monthly Gross beta/monthly Tritium/monthly Gamma scan/monthly

c. Potable Water (Raw & Treated) 2F3 Monthly (composited daily)

Gross alpha/monthly Gross beta/monthly Tritium/monthly Gamma scan/monthly Iodine-131/monthly Gamma scan/on collection

\\D

d.

Vegetables 3E1 3F5 6F2 2F4 2F9 3F6 3F8 14F3 lGI 2G2 3H5 9G1 14G2 Annually (at harvest)

e.

Game (Muskrat) llD1 3E1 Annually

    • Gamma scan/on collection
    • Gamma scan/on collection
f.

Fodder Crops 2F9 2G3 11F3 14F4 3Gl Annually

g. Soil 6S2 10D1 16E1 2F7 2F9 5F1 11F3 14F4,

3G1 Every 3 years (2001-2004-2007)

Gamma scan/on collection

TABLE 1 (cont'd)

SALEM AND HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATIONS RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM (PROGRAM OVERVIEW)

STATION CODE COLLECTION MEDIUM INDICATOR CONTROL FREQUENCY TYPE/FREQUENCY* OF ANALYSIS IV. AQUATIC ENVIRONMENT 11Al 7E1 lF2 16F1 12C1

a. Surface Water Monthly Gross beta/monthly Gamma scan/monthly Tritium/quarterly
b. Edible Fish hlAl 7E1 12C1 Semi-annually Gamma scan (flesh)/on collection 0o
c. Blue Crabs 1lAI 12C1 Semi -

annually Gamma scan (flesh)/on collection

d. Sediment llA1 6S2 7E1 15A1 16F1 16A1 12C1 Semi-annually Gamma scan/on collection
  • Except for TLDs, the quarterly analysis is quarter.
    • Management audit analyses, not required by officials.

performed on a composite of individual samples collected during the Technical Specifications or by specific commitments to local

FIGURE 1 GROSS BETA ACTIVITY IN AIR PARTICULATE 1982 THROUGH 2002 1000 -

100 -

m a0 10 -

Chernobyl 04-26-86 GROSS BETA IN AIR PARTICULATE 1973 THROUGH 2002 1000 10 1976 1982 1988 1994 2000 Hope Creek Criticality 06-28-86 1

..... I..

I..............

I........

I.,

I......

1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 IQUARTERLY AVERAGE]

FIGURE 2 AMBIENT RADIATION - OFFSITE vs CONTROL STATION 1982 THROUGH 2002 10.0 8.0 c 6.0 0I.-E 4.0 2.0 0.0 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 L9UARTERLY AVERAGE c l

FIGURE 3 IODINE - 131 ACTIVITY IN MILK 1982 THROUGH 2002 20 -

10 -

IODINE-131 ACTIVITY IN MILK 1973 THROUGH 2002 30.00 ---

777777.

Ad 20.00-10.00 0.00 4

-10.00 1988 1994 2000 1976 1982 1988 1994 2000 Chernobyl 04-26-86 w'

-j 0L Hope Creek Criticality 9 l 06-28-86 0

i r

_aLa

=_

^t 7i-

=

-10 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 QUARTERLY AVERAGE

FIGURE 4 GROSS BETA ACTIVITY IN SURFACE WATER 1982 THROUGH 2002 1000 -

100 -

CLM 10 -

1 9 82 1982 1000 100 10 GROSS BETA ACTIVITY IN SURFACE WATER 1973 THROUGH 2002 Chernobyl 04-26-86 1976 1982 1988 1994 2000 06-28-86 I.....I.........

I.............................................................................................................................I 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 IQUARTERLY AVERAGE

FIGURE 5 TRITIUM ACTIVITY IN SURFACE WATER 1982 THROUGH 2002 10,000 1,000 C-)

TRITIUM ACTIVITY IN SURFACE WATER 1973 Through 2002 1000 loJ 1976 1982 1968 1994 2000 Chernobyl 04-26-86 100 -

Hope Creek Criticality 06-28-86 10 I I I

. 1 1......,.... -

1.

.... I.,..,..

. 1 1...... I..... I

. 1...

1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002

[QUARTERLY AVERAGEI

FIGURE 6A CESIUM-137 ACTIVITY IN AQUATIC SEDIMENT 1982 THROUGH 2002 10000 1000 100 10 CESIUM-137 ACTIVITY IN AQUATIC SEDIMENT 1977 THROUGH 2002 10000 1000 100 10 I

1974 1978 1982 1986 1990 1994 1998 2002 Chernobyl 04-26-86 Hope Creek Criticality 06-26-86 l

1 1982 I

I I

I I

I I

I 1984 1986 1

I I.

.2 1990 1992 1994 I.

I I

1996 1988 I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I 1998 2000 2002 SEMI-ANNUAL AVERAGE

FIGURE 6B COBALT-60 ACTIVITY IN AQUATIC SEDIMENT 1982 THROUGH 2002 10000 1000 100 10 COBALT-60 ACTIVITY IN AQUATIC SEDIMENT 1977 THROUGH 2002 100 L

10li; ;'oc 10 1974 1978 1982 1986 1990 1994 1998 2002 Chernobyl 04-26-86 Hope Creek Criticality 06-26-86 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 9

1996 1 9 9 I.

1994 1996 1998 r

2.0 2000 2

0 2002 SEMI-ANNUAL AVERAGE

REFERENCES

[1]

Public Service Enterprise Group.

"Environmental Report, Operating License Stage -

Salem Nuclear Generating Station Units 1 and 2".

1971.

[2]

Public Service Enterprise Group.

"Environmental Report, Operating License Stage -

Hope Creek Generating Station".

1983.

[3]

United States Atomic Energy Commission.

"Final Environmental Statement -

Salem Nuclear Generating Station, Units 1 and 2".

Docket No. 50-272 and 50-311. 1973.

[4]

United States Atomic Energy Commission.

"Final Environmental Statement -

Hope Creek Generating Station, Docket No. 50-354. 1983.

[5]

Public Service Enterprise Group.

"Updated Final Safety Analysis Report -

Salem Nuclear Generating Station, Units 1 and 2".

1982.

[6)

Public Service Enterprise Group.

"Updated Final Safety Analysis Report -

Hope Creek Generating Station.

[7]

Radiation Management Corporation.

"Artificial Island Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program -

Annual Reports 1973 through 1982".

[8]

Radiation Management Corporation.

"Artificial Island Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program -

Preoperation Summary -

1973 through 1976".

RMC-TR-77-03, 1978.

[9]

Radiation Management Corporation.

"Artificial Island Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program -

December 11 to December 31, 1976".

RMC-TR-77-02, 1977.

[10]

PSEG Power LLC Maplewood Testing Services.

"Salem and Hope Creek Generating Stations' Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program -

Annual Reports 1983 through 2001".

[11]

PSEG Power LLC Maplewood Testing Services. "Quality Assurance Plan."

June, 2001

[12]

Public Service Enterprise Group.

"Salem Nuclear Generating Station Technical Specifications", Appendix A to Operating License No. DPR-70, 1976, Sections 6.8.4.h -

1,2,3 and 6.9.1.7.

[13]

Public Service Enterprise Group.

"Hope Creek Generating Station Technical Specifications", Appendix A to Facility Operating License No. NPF-57, 1986, Sections 6.8.4.h -

1,2,3 and 6.9.1.6.

[14]

Public Service Enterprise Group.

"Offsite Dose Calculation Manual" Salem Generating Station.

28

REFERENCES (cont ' d)

[15)

Public Service Enterprise Group.

Hope Creek Generating Station.

[16]

U.S. Environmental Protection Agenc of Radioactivity in Drinking Water.

"Offsite Dose Calculation Manual"

y.

"Prescribed Procedures for Measurement

." EPA-600/4-80-032, August, 1980.

29

APPENDIX A PROGRAM SUDLMARY 31

RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SALEM GENERATING STATION HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION SALEM COUNTY, NEW JERSEY JANU DOCKET 50-272/-311 DOCKET NO. 50-354 IARY 1, 2002 to DECEMBER 31, 2002 MEDIUM OR PATHWAY Analysis And Lower All Indicator Locations Location with Highest Mean Control Location Number of SAMPLE Total Number Limit of Mean Name Mean Mean Nonroutine (UNIT OF MEASUREMENT) of Analyses Detection (Range)

Distance and Direction (Range)

(Range)

Reported Performed (LLD)

  • Measurements I. AIRBORNE Air Particulates (10-3 pCi/n 3)

Beta 311 6.0 Gamma Be7 23 (259 /260 )

(12-40) 60 (20 /20)

(43-76) 14G1 11.8 mi WNW 5D1 3.5 mi E 14G1 11.8 mi WNW 25 (52 /52 )

25 (52 /52 )

(14-47)

(14-47) 0 0

0 24 7.6 60 (4/4)

(49-70) 60 (4 /4)

(45-70) 60 (4/4)

(47-76) 60 (4 /4)

(45-70) 16E1 4.1 mi NNW 0

W K-40 24 13 1-131 311 9.1 10 (9 /20 )

(8-13) 5S1 1.0 mi E 11 (3/4)

(10-13) 8 (1 /4)

(8-8)

< LLD 0

0 Air Iodine (103 pCi/m 3)

< LLD

< LLD 11 DIRECT Direct Radiation (mrad/std. month)

Quarterly Badges 194 4 (175 /175)

(2.6-6.9) 2S2 0.4 mi NNE 6 (3 /3 )

(5.4-6.9) 4.3 (23 /23 )

(3.4-5.1) 0 III TERRESTRIAL Milk (pCi/L) 1-131 80 0.5

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD 0

Gamma K-40 80 50

\\1350 (60 /60)

(1010-1470) 13E3 4.9 mi W 1370 (20 /20 ) 1340 (20 /20 )

(1270-1460)

(1170-1440) 0

RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SALEM GENERATING STATION HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION SALEM COUNTY. NEW JERSEY JANL DOCKET 50-272/-311 DOCKET NO. 50-354 JARY 1. 2002 to DECEMBER 31, 2002 MEDIUM OR PATHWAY Analysis And Lower All Indicator Locations Location with Highest Mean Control Location Number of SAMPLE Total Number Limit of Mean Name Mean Mean Nonroutine (UNIT OF MEASUREMENT) of Analyses Detection (Range)

Distance and Direction (Range)

(Range)

Reported Performed (LLD)

  • Measurements IlIl TERRESTRIAL Well Water (pCi/LI Alpha 12 1.7 Beta H-3 Gamma K-40 12 1 0*.*

12 180 12 30 2.3 (9/12 1 (1.5-3) 11 (12/12)

(10-13)

< LLD 51 (4/121 (43-58) 112 (12 /12 )

(40-176) 3E11 4.1 mi NE 3E1 4 1 mi NE 3E1 4.1mi NE 3E1 4.1mi NE 2.3 (9 /12 )

(1.5-3) 11 (12/12 )

(10-13)

< LLD 51 (4/12)

(43-58) 112 (12 /12 )

(40-176)

No Control Location No Control Location No Control Location No Control Location No Control Location 0

0 0

0 0

W~

RA-NAT 12 6 5 Potable Water (pCi/L)

Alpha 24 1.0 Beta 24 1.0***

1.2 (15 /24)

(0.8-2) 3 4 (24 /24)

(2.6-4.9)

< LLD 2F3 8.0 mi NNE 2F3 8.0 mi NNE 1.2 (15/24)

(0.8-2) 3.4 (24 /24)

(2.6-4.9)

< LLD No Control Location No Control Location No Control Location H-3 Gamma K-40 24 180 0

0 0

0 0

0 24 30 52 (8/24)

(44-651

< LLD 1-131 24 0.4 RA-NAT 24 6.5 2F3 8.0 mi NNE 2F3 8.0 mi NNE 52 (8 /24)

No Control (44-65)

Location

< LLD No Control Location 16 (4 /24 )

No Control (4.9-42)

Location 16 (4 /24)

(4.9-42)

RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SALEM GENERATING STATION DOCKET 50-272/-311 HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-354 SALEM COUNTY, NEW JERSEY JANUARY 1, 2002 to DECEMBER 31, 2002 MEDIUM OR PATHWAY Analysis And Lower All Indicator Locations Location with Highest Mean Control Location Number of SAMPLE Total Number Limit of Mean Name Mean Mean Nonroutine (UNIT OF MEASUREMENT) of Analyses Detection (Range)

Distance and Direction (Range)

(Range)

Reported Performed (LLD)

  • Measurements IlIl TERRESTRIAL Fruit &

Vegetables (pCi/Kg-wet)

Gamma K-40 21 RA-NAT 21 3

70 3

1 3 2350 (12 /12 )

(1620-3030)

< LLD 6F2 8.2 mi ESE 3H5 25 mi NE 2950 (1 /1 )

(2950-2950) 38 (1 /5 )

(38) 2050 (14 /14 )

(1320-2550) 38 0

0 Game (pCi/Kg-wet)

Fodder Crops (pCi/Kg-wet)

Gamma K-40 Gamma Be-7 K-40 RA-NAT 2

70 6

46 6

70 6

22 3240 (1 /1 )

(3240) 240 (2 /4)

(140-340) 8870 (4 /4)

(2630-14800) 23 (1 /4)

(23) 3E1 4.1 mi. NE 3G1 17 mi NE 2G3 12 mi NNE 2G3 12 mi NNE 3240 (1 /1 )

(3240) 390 (1 /2 )

(390) 14800 (1/1)

(14800-14800) 23 (1 /1 )

(23) 2580 (1 /1 )

(2580) 390 (1 /2)

(390) 12190 (2 /2 )

(9780-14600)

< LLD 0

0 0

0 IV AQUATIC Surface Water (pCi/L)

Beta H-3 Gamma K-40 60 3.8 78 (48 /48 )

(6-168) 20 200 197 (1 /48 )

(197-197) 60 30 112 (43 /48 )

(52-200) 7E1 4.5 mi SE 11Al 0.2 mi SW 11Al 0.2 mi SW 7E1 4.5 mi SE 110 (12 /12 I (71-161) 197 (1 /12 )

(197-197) 135 (10 /12 )

(83-193) 135 (12 /12 )

(77-200) 76 (12/12)

(25-1 56)

< LLD 91 (11 /12 )

(46-141) 0 0

0

RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SALEM GENERATING STATION HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION SALEM COUNTY, NEW JERSEY JANL DOCKET 50-272/-311 DOCKET NO. 50-354 JARY 1, 2002 to DECEMBER 31, 2002 MEDIUM OR PATHWAY Analysis And Lower All Indicator Locations Location with Highest Mean Control Location Number of SAMPLE Total Number Limit of Mean Name Mean Mean Nonroutine (UNIT OF MEASUREMENT) of Analyses Detection (Range)

Distance and Direction (Range)

(Range)

Reported Performed (LLD)

  • Measurements IV AQUATIC Blue Crabs (pCi/kg-wet)

Edible Fish (pCi/kg-wet)

Gamma K-40 Gamma K-40 2

70 6

70 3050 (1 /1 )

(3050-3050) 3540 (4 /4 )

(3190-3980) 11A1 0.2 miSW 12C1 2.5 mi WSW 3050 (1 /1) 3010 (1 /1 )

(3050-3050)

(3010-30101 3825 (2 /2 )

3825 (2 /2 )

(3630-4020)

(3630-4020) 0 0

Sediment (pCi/kg-dry)

Gamma Be-7 14 158 1640 (1 /12)

(1640-1640)

K-40 14 70 12020 (12 /12)

(1310-16800)

Co-60 14 53 53 (1 /12 )

(53-53)

Cs-134 14 15

<LLD 16A1 0.7 mi NNW 11A1 0.2 mi SW 16A1 0.7 mi NNW 1640 (1 /2)

(1640) 15600 (2 /2)

(15300-15900) 53 (1 /2)

(53)

< LLD 11950 (2 /2 )

(10200- 13700)

< LLD

< LLD 0

0 0

0 Cs-137 14 33 68 (9 /12 )

(8-119)

RA-NAT 14 45 530 (12 /12)

(80-800)

Th-232 14 50 810 (12 /12 )

(90-1130) 1 1A1 0.2 mi SW 7E1 4.5 mi SE I1A1 0.2 mi SW 110 (2/2)

(100-119) 760 (2/2)

(710-800) 1070 (2 /2)

(1060- 1080)

< LLD 690 12 /2 )

(590-790) 865 (2 /2 )

(800-930) 0 0

0

  • LLD listed is the lower limit of detection which we endeavoredlto achieve during this reporting period. In some instances nuclides were detected at concentrations above the LLD values shown.

Mean calculated using values above LLD only. Fraction of measurements above LLD are in parentheses.

I*

Typical LLD values.

APPENDIX B

SAMPLE DESIGNATION AND LOCATIONS 37

APPENDIX B SAMPLE DESIGNATION The PSEG's Maplewood Testing Services identifies samples by a three part code.

The first two letters are the program identification code.

Because of the proximity of the Salem and Hope Creek Stations a common environmental surveillance program is being conducted.

The identification code, "SA", has been applied to Salem and Hope Creek stations.

The next three letters are for the media sampled.

AIO APT ECH ESF ESS FPL FPV GAM

= Air Iodine

= Air Particulate

= Hard Shell Blue Crab

= Edible Fish

= Sediment

= Green Leafy Vegetables

= Vegetables (Various)

= Game (Muskrat)

IDM =

MLK =

PWR =

PWT =

SOL =

SWA =

VGT =

WWA =

Immersion Dose (TLD)

Milk Potable Water (Raw)

Potable Water (Treated)

Soil Surface Water Fodder Crops (Various)

Well Water The last four symbols are a location code based on direction and distance from a standard reference point.

Of these, the first two represent each of the sixteen angular sectors of 22.5 degrees centered about the reactor site.

Sector one is divided evenly by the north axis and other sectors are numbered in a clockwise, direction; e.g., 2=NNE, 3=NE, 4=ENE, etc.

The next digit is a letter which represents the radial distance from the reference point:

S = On-site location A = 0-1 miles off-site B = 1-2 miles off-site C = 2-3 miles off-site D = 3-4 miles off-site E =

F =

G =

H =

4-5 miles off-site 5-10 miles off-site 10-20 miles off-site

>20 miles off-site The last number is the station numerical designation within each sector and zone; e.g., 1,2,3,...

For example, the designation SA-WWA-3E1 would indicate a sample in the Salem and Hope Creek program (SA), consisting of well water (WWA), which had been collected in sector number 3, centered at 450 (north east) with respect to the reactor site at a radial distance of 4 to 5 miles off-site, (therefore, radial distance E).

The number 1 indicates that this is sampling station #1 in that particular sector.

39

TABLE B-1 SAMPLING LOCATIONS Specific information about the individual sampling locations are given in Table B-1.

Maps B-1 and B-2 show the locations of sampling stations with respect to the site.

A Portable Global Positioning System (GPS) was used to provide the coordinates of sampling-locations.

The Datem used was WGS 84.

STATION CODE isi 2S2 2S4 3S1 4S1 5S1 6S2 o 7S1 10S1 i Sl 15S1 16S1 1 lAl 15Al 16A1 12C1 4D2 SD1 1OD1 liD1 14D1 15D1 2E1 3E1 STATION LOCATION 0.55mi. N of vent 0.4 mi. NNE of vent; Lamp Pole 65 Near HC Switch Yard 0.59 mi. NNE of vent 0.58 mi. NE of vent 0.60 mi. ENE of vent 1.0 mi. E of vent; site access road 0.2 mi. ESE of vent; observation building 0.12 mi. SE of vent; station personnel gate 0.14 mi. SSW of vent; inlet cooling water bldg.

0.09 mi. SW of vent; service water inlet bldg.

0.57 mi. NW of vent 0.54 mi. NNW of vent 0.2 mi. SW of vent; outfall area 0.3 mi. NW of vent; cooling tower blowdown discharge line outfall 0.7 mi. NNW of vent; south storm drain discharge line LATITUDINAL DEG. MIN. SEC 39 -

28 -

16 39 -

28 -

07 LONGITUDINAL DEG. MIN. SEC 75 -

32 -

15 75 -

32 -

00 IDM IDM SAMPLE TYPE 39 -

28 -

16 75 -

31 -

55 IDM 39 -

28 -

08 75 -

31 -

41 IDM 39 -

28 -

02 75 -

31 -

33 IDM 39 -

27 -

38 75 -

31 -

08 AIO,APT,IDM 39 -

27 -

43 75 -

31 -

55 IDM,SOL,ESS 39 -

27 -

44 75 -

32 -

03 IDM 39 39 75 -32

-10 IDM 39 -

27 -

43 75 -

32 -

12 IDM 39 -

28 -

10 75 -

32 -

32 IDM 39 -

28 -

13 75 -

32 -

26 IDM 39 -

27 -

59 75 -

32 -

25 ECH,ESF,ESS,SWA 39 -27

-67 75 -32

-19 ESS 39 -

28 -

24 75 -

32 -

58 ESS 2.5 3.7 3.5 3.9 3.5 3.4 3.8 4.4 4.1 mi.

mi.

mi.

mi.

mi.

mi.

mi.

mi.

mi.

WSW of vent; west bank of Delaware River ENE of vent; Alloway Creek Neck Road E of vent; local farm SSW of vent; Taylor's Bridge Spur SW of vent WNW of vent; Bay View, Delaware NW of vent; Rt. 9, Augustine aeach NNE of vent; local farm NE of vent; local farm 39 -

27 -

22 75 -

34 -

08 ECH,ESF,ESS,SWA 39 -

29 -

18 75 -

32 -

11 IDM 39 -

28 -

24 75 -

28 -

22 AIO,APT,IDM 39 37 75 -33

- 44 IDM,SOL 39 -

24 -

49 75 -

34 -

26 GAM 39 02 75 -35

- 31 IDM 39 -

30 -

08 75 -

35 -

02 IDM 39 -

31 -

23 75 -

30 -

26 IDM 39 -

30 -

07 75 -

28 -

41 GAM,IDM,VGTIWWA,FPV

TABLE B-1 (cont ' d)

STATION CODE 7E1 9E1 11E2 12E1 13E1 13E3 16E1 IFI 1F2 2F2 2F3 2F4 2F5 2F6

.p, 2F7 2F8 2F9 3F2 3F3 3F5 3F6 3F8 4F2 5F1 6F1 6F2 7F2 9F1 10F2 llFl 11F3 12F1 STATION LOCATION 4.5 mi.

4.2 mi.

5.0 mi.

4.4 mi.

4.2 mi.

4.9 mi.

4.1 mi.

5.8 mi.

7.1 mi.

8.7 mi.

Salem 8.0 ml.

6.3 ml.

7.4 ml.

7.3 ml.

5.7 ml.

5.3 ml.

7.5 ml.

Tilbury 5.1 ml.

8.6 ml.

9.4 ml.

6.5 ml.

Road 5.1 ml.

Bridge 6.0 ml.

6.5 ml.

6.4 ml.

8.2 mi.

9.1 mi.

5.3 mi.

5.8 mi.

6.2 mi.

5.3 mi.

SE of vent; 1 mi. W of Mad Horse Creek S of vent SW of vent; Rt. 9 WSW of vent; Thomas Landing W of vent; Diehl House Lab W of vent; Joseph Vari, Odessa, DE NNW of vent; Port Penn N of vent; Fort Elfsborg N of vent; midpoint of Delaware River NNE of vent; Corner of 5 th & Howell, LATITUDINAL DEG. MIN. SEC 39 -

25 -

08 39 -

24 -

10 39 -

24 -

20 39 -

26 -

52 39 -

27 -

59 39 -

27 -

17 39 -

30 -

47 39 -

32 -

45 39 -

33 -

08 39 -

34 -

38 LONGITUDINAL DEG. MIN.

SEC SAMPLE TYPE 75 -

28 75 -

32 75 -

35 75 -

36 75 -

36 75 -

37 75 -

34 75 -

31 75 -

32 75 -

28 64 42 33 59 44 30 34 06 54 04 NNE of vent; Salem Water Company NNE of vent; local farm NNE of vent; Salem High School NNE of vent; Southern Training Center NNE of vent; local farm NNE OF vent; local farm NNE of vent; Tilbury Farms, 45 S.

Rd, Salem NE of vent;Hancocks Bridge Municipal Bld NE of vent; Quinton Township School NE of vent; Harris's Farm Market NE of vent; #324 Salem/Hancocks Bridge NE of vent; 33 Maple Ave., Hancocks ENE of vent; Mays Lane, Harmersville E of vent; Canton ESE of vent; Stow Neck Road ESE of vent; RD#3 Box 160 Bridgeton, NJ SE of vent; Bayside, New Jersey S of vent; D.P.A.L. 48912-30217 SSW of vent; Rt. 9 SW of vent; Taylor's Bridge Delaware SW of vent; Townsend, Delaware 39 -

33 -

40 75 -

27 -

18 39 -

33 -

21 75 -

30 -

33 39 -

33 -

27 75 -

28 -

31 39 -

33 -

43 75 -

28 -

48 39-32-40 75-30-53 39 -

31 -

54 75 -

29 -

18 39 -

33 -

55 75 -

29 -

30 ESF,ESS,SWA IDM IDM IDM IDM MLK,FPV,VGT AIO,APT,IDM,SOL AIO,APT,IDM SWA IDM PWR,PWT FPV,FPL IDM AIO,APT,IDM SOL FPV MLK,FPV,VGT,SOL IDM IDM FPV FPV FPV,FPL IDM IDM,SOL IDM FPV,FPL IDM IDM IDM IDM MLK,VGT,SOL 39 -

30 -

25 39 -

32 -

38 39 -

33 -

29 39 -

32 -

03 39 -

30 -25 39 -

29 -

58 39 -

28 -

22 39 -

26 -

24 39 -

26 -

04 39 -

22 -

56 39 -

23 -

03 39 -

23 -

01 39 -

24 -

44 39 -

24 -

06 75 -

27 -

36 75 -

24 -

45 75 -

24 -

54 75 -

28 -

00 75 -

27 -

37 75 -

26 -

03 75 -

24 -

59 75 -

25 -

09 75 -

23 -

09 75 -

24 -

17 75 -

32 -

06 75 -

34 -

09 75 -

37 -

37 75 -

36 -

20 9.4 ml. WSW of vent; Townsend Elementary School 39 -

23 -

47 75 18 IDM

TABLE B-1 (cont'd)

STATION CODE 13 F2 13F3 13F4 14F2 14F3 14F4 15F3 16F1 16F2 1GI 1G3 1G4 2G2 2G3 3G1 9G1 10G1 14G1 14G2 16G1 3H1 3H5 3H3 STATION LOCATION 6.5 mi. W of vent; Odessa, Delaware 9.3 mi. W of vent; Redding Middle School, Middletown, Delaware 9.8 mi. W of vent; Middletown, Delaware 6.6 mi. WNW of vent; Boyds Corner 5.4 mi. WNW of vent; local farm 7.6 mi. WNW of vent; local farm 5.4 mi. NW of vent 6.9 mi. NNW of vent; C&D Canal 8.1 mi. NNW of vent; Delaware City Public School 10.3 mi. N of vent; local farm 19 mi. N of vent; N. Church St. Wilmington, Del 10.8 mi. N of vent; (Dads Produce) Rte. 49, South Broadway, Pennsville 13.5 mi. NNE of vent; Moore's Market; 324 Pointers Auburn Road (Rt. 540), Salem, NJ 08079 12 mi. NNE; Asa Caldwallader, Waldac Farms, Corner of Routes 540 & 45 17 mi. NE of vent; Mr. Lee Williams Farm 10.3 mi. S of Vent; Mr. Goldsburrough, 1784 Woodland Beach Rd., Smyrna, Delaware 12 mi. SSW of vent; Smyrna, Delaware 11.8 mi. WNW of vent; Rte. 286; Bethel Church Road; Delaware 12.1 mi. WNW of vent; Locust Grove Farm & Garden Center; 1084 Bethel Church Road; Middletown, DE 19709 15 mi. NNW of vent; Across from Greater Wilmington Airport 32 mi. NE of vent; National Park, New Jersey 25 mi. NE of vent; Sorbello Girl's Market 110 mi. NE of vent; Maplewood Testing Services LATITUDINAL LONGITUDINAL SAMPLE TYPE DEG. MIN.

SECu DEG. MIN.

SEC.

39 -

27 -

18 75 -

39 -

21 39 -

27 -

14 75 -

42 -

32 39 -

26 -

51 75 43 -

07 39 -

30 -

00 75 -

38 -

59 39 -

29 -

33 75 -

37 -

55 39 -

30 -

44 75 -

40 -

52 39 -

30 -

58 75 -

36 -

36 39 -

33 -

55 75 -

34 -

25 39 -

34 -

18 75 -

35 -

25 39 -

36 -

31 75 -

29 -

59 39 -

44 -

16 75 -

32 -

31 39 -

37 -

55 75 -

30 -

44 IDM IDM IDM IDM FPV, FPL MLK,VGT,SOL IDM ESS,SWA IDM FPV,FPL IDM FPV 1'..)

39 -

38 -

19 39 -

36 -

21 39 -

35 -

56 39 -

18 -

47 39 -

18 -

13 39 -

31 -

18 39 -

31 -

21 39 -

40 -

38 75 -

24 -

53 75 -

16 -

47 75 -

33 -

50 75 -

36 -

05 75 -

46 -

30 75 -

44 -

57 75 -

35 -

35 MLK,FPV,VGT IDM, MLK, VGT, SOL FPV IDM AIO,APT,IDM FPV IDM 75 -

26 -

10 FPV 39 -

51 -

36 75 -

11 -

06 IDM 39 -

41 -

02 75 -

12 -

23 FPL,FPV 40 -

43 -

25 74 -

15 -

09 IDM NOTE:

All station locations are referenced to the midpoint of location are:

Latitude N 390 -

27' -

45.3" and Longitude W 750 the two Salem Units' 32' -

09.7".

Vents.

The coordinates of this All Game (GAM), Vegetables(FPV & FPL) and Vegetation (VGT), are management audit samples.

They are not required by the Salem & Hope Creek Stations' Tech Specs nor listed in the Station's ODCM.

Vegetable samples are not always collected in consecutive years from the same farmer since they rotate the type of crop they grow.

MAP B-1 ON-SITE SAMPLING LOCATIONS 1

5 9

43

MAP B-2 SALEM AND HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATIONS RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM OFF-SITE SAMPLING LOCATION 15 NW 16 NNW 1 AEE N

2 NNE 3

A t Q 3H5 CLAY-f-i HUNDIED 00 LOWER tu PENNS NE Pv UNDRED PENCA ER HUNDRED HUNDR QUI 4

EORGES

-HUNUHLU ALLO 13 1 270?-

90 ENE 4i PO H

D D

F L

F LLJ GI CAME CO 2

3 4

12 H HI I

SCALF OF MLES Bom NAMNAL"'A SE 44 Co

--z-

. l..

APPENDIX C DATA TABLES

$1 45

APPENDIX C DATA TABLES Appendix C presents the analytical results of the 2002 Radio-logical Environmental Monitoring Program for the period of January 1 to December 31, 2002.

TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE NO.

TABLE DESCRIPTION PAGE ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT AIR PARTICULATES C-1 2002 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Quarterly Composites of Air Particulates.51 C-2 2002 Concentrations of Gross Beta Emitters in Air Particulates.

52 AIR IODINE C-3 2002 Concentrations of Iodine-131 in Filtered Air.............

54 DIRECT RADIATION THERMOLUMINESCENT DOSIMETERS C-4 2002 Direct Radiation Measurements -

Quarterly TLD Results.....

56 TERRESTRIAL ENVIRONMENT MILK C-5 2002 Concentrations of Iodine-131 and Gamma Emitters in Milk...

57 WELL WATER C-6 2002 Concentrations of Gross Alpha and Gross Beta Emitters, and Tritium in Well Water......................................

59 47

DATA TABLES (cont'd.)

TABLE NO TABLE DESCRIPTION PAGE TERRESTRIAL ENVIRONMENT (cont'd)

C-7 2002 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Well Water............

60 POTABLE WATER C-8 2002 Concentrations of Gross Alpha and Gross Beta Emitters, and Tritium in Raw and Treated Potable Waters.61 C-9 2002 Concentrations of Iodine 131 and Gamma Emitters in Raw and Treated Potable Water..........................................

62 FOOD PRODUCTS C-10 2002 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Vegetables............

63 C-li 2002 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Game.64 FODDER CROPS C-12 2002 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Fodder Crops..........

65 AQUATIC ENVIRONMENT SURFACE WATER C-13 2002 Concentrations of Gross Beta Emitters in Surface Water 66 C-14 2002 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Surface Water.........

67 C-15 2002 Concentrations of Tritium in Quarterly Composites of Surface Water..........................................................

69 EDIBLE FISH C-16 2002 Concentrations of Strontium-89, Strontium-90 and Gamma Emitters in Edible Fish.70 48

DATA TABLES (cont'd.)

TABLE NO.

TABLE DESCRIPTION PAGE BLUE CRABS C-17 2002 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Crabs.................

71 SEDIMENT C-18 2002 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Sediment..............

72 SPECIAL TABLES LLDs C-19 2002 PSE&G Maplewood Testing Services' LLDs for Gamma Spectroscopy..................................................

73 49

Table C-1 2002 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS*

IN QUARTERLY COMPOSITES OF AIR PARTICULATES Results in Units of 10-3 pCi/m3 +/- 2 sigma STATION Sampling Period

< --- Gamma Emitters --- >

ID Start Stop Be-7 K-40 SA-APT-5S1 SA-APT-1 F1 SA-APT-2F6 SA-APT-5D 1 SA-APT-16E1 SA-APT-1 4G 1 (C)

SA-APT-5S 1 SA-APT-1 F1 SA-APT-2F6 SA-APT-5D 1 SA-APT-16E1 SA-APT-14G 1 (C)

SA-APT-5S 1 SA-APT-1 F1 SA-APT-2F6 SA-APT-5D1 SA-APT-16E1 SA-APT-14G 1 (C) 1/2/2002 1/2/2002 1/2/2002 1/2/2002 1/3/2002 1/3/2002 4/1/2002 4/1/2002 4/1/2002 4/1/2002 4/1/2002 4/1/2002 7/1/2002 7/1/2002 7/1/2002 7/1/2002 7/1/2002 7/1/2002 to 4/1/2002 to 4/1/2002 to 4/1/2002 to 4/1/2002 to 4/1/2002 to 4/1/2002 to 7/1/2002 to 7/1/2002 to 7/1/2002 to 7/1/2002 to 7/1/2002 to 7/1/2002 to 9/30/2002 to 9/30/2002 to 9/30/2002 to 9/30/2002 to 9/30/2002 to 9/30/2002 I 51 +/-4 53+/-4 56+/-4 54+/-4 47+/-4 58+/-5 75+/-5 73+/-5 68+/-5 70+/-4 76+/-4 70+/-5 70+/-6 67+/-5 68+/-4 66+/-4 67+/-4 68+/-5 11 +/-4

<9

<3

<4 11 +/- 2 8+3 13+/-3

<5

<6

<4

<3

<4

<4

<5

<4 9+/-2

<4

<6 SA-APT-5S1 SA-APT-1 F1 SA-APT-2F6 SA-APT-5D1 SA-APT-1 6E1 SA-APT-14G1 (C) 9/30/2002 9/30/2002 9/30/2002 9/30/2002 10/1/2002 10/1/2002 to 12/30/2002 to 12/30/2002 to 12/30/2002 to 12/30/2002 to 12/30/2002 to 12/30/2002 43+/-4 45+/-3 45+/-3 49+/-3 50+/-4 45+/-3 10+/-2 10+/-2 10+/-2 8+/-2 10+3

<2 AVERAGE 60+/- 22

  • All other gamma emitters searched for were <LLD; typical LLDs are given in Table C-19.

(C) Control Station 51

TABLE C-2 2002 CONCENTRATIONS OF GROSS BETA EMITTERS IN AIR PARTICULATES Results in Units of 103 pCi/m 3 +/- 2 sigma

<------------------------------------------- STATION ID ---------------------------------------- >

Control MONTH SA-APT-14G1 SA-APT-16E1 SA-APT-1F1 SA-APT-2F6 SA-APT-5D1 SA-APT-5S1 AVERAGE t'j January February March April May June 30+/-3 34+/-3 23i2 25+/-2 19+/-2 25+/-3 47+/-3 24+/-2 21 +/-2 33+/-3 24+/-3 25i2 19 +/- 2 25+/-2 22+/-2 27+/-3 19+/-2 21 +/- 3 26+/-2 20+/-2 21 +/-2 26+/-3 20+/-2 18+/-2 27+/-3 28+/-3 27+/-3 27+/-3 25+/-2 23+/-2 18+/-2 20+/-2 36+/-3 28+/-3 20+/-2 32+/-3 22+/-2 22+/-2 18+/-2 27+/-2 18+/-2 28+/-3 18+/-2 21 +/-3 25+/-2 20+/-2 14+/-2 25+/-3 18+/-3 18+/-2 21 +/-2 26+/-2 28+/-3 29+/-3 (1) 24+/- 2 22+/-2 24+/-2 35+/-3 24+/-3 19+/-2 29+/-3 24+/-2 24+/-3 17+/-2 24+/-2 19+/-2 30+/-3 16+/-2 21 +/- 3 24+/-2 20+/-2 22+/-2 26+/-2 18+/-2 20+/-2 22+/-2 29+/-3 30+/-3 32+/-3 23+/-2 21 +/- 2 23+/-2 23+/-2 40+/-3 26+/-3 21 +/-2 34+/-3 22+/-2 26+/-3 18+/-2 25+/-2 22+/-2 26+/-2 19+/-2 24+/-3 24+/-2 19+/-2 22+/-2 27+/-3 20+/-3 16+/-2 23+/-2 26+2 27+/-3 28+/-3 21 +/-2 20+/-2 20+/-2 24+/-2 28+/-2 23+/-2 20+/- 2 30+/-3 22+/-2 28+/-3 19+/-2 24+/-2 21 +/-2 26+/-3 17+/-2 21 +/- 3 22+/-2 20+/-2 20+/-2 28+/-3 16+/-2 13+/-2 21 +/- 2 24+/-2 26+/-3 29+/-3 23+/-3 22+/-2 20+/-2 19+/-2 24+/-2 23+/-3 17+/-2 33+/-3 20+/-2 26+/-3 18+/-2 24+/-2 18+/-2 28+/-3 18+/-2 22+/-3 25+/-2 15+/-2 19+/-2 25+/-3 16+/-2 18+/-2 21 +/-2 27+/-2 28+/-3 30+/-5 23+/-3 22+/-3 20+/-4 22+/-5 35+/- 16 24+/-4 20+/-3 32+/-4 22+/-3 25+/-4 18 +/-1 25+/-2 20+/-4 27+/-3 18+/-2 22+/-3 24+/-3 19+/-4 20+/-6 26:+/-2 18+/-4 17+/-5 22+/-4 26+/-4

TABLE C-2 2002 CONCENTRATIONS OF GROSS BETA EMITTERS IN AIR PARTICULATES Results in Units of 10-3 pCi/M 3 +/- 2 sigma


STATION ID ----------------- ------------------------- >

Control MONTH SA-APT-14G1 SA-APT-16E1 SA-APT-1F1 SA-APT-21`6 SA-APT-5D1 SA-APT-5S1 AVERAGE July August September October November December AVERAGE 33+/-3 28+/-3 39+/-3 21 +/-2 36+/-3 22+/-2 39+/-3 27+/-3 17+/-2 24+/-3 30+/-2 32+/-3 23+/-2 34+/-3 14+/-2 21 +/- 2 23+/-2 31 +/- 3 25+/-2 22+/-2 26+/-2 21 +/-2 25+/-2 16+/-2 20+/-2 20+/-2 25 +/- 13 34+/-3 29+/-2 37+/-3 18 +/-2 32+/-2 19+/-2 30+/-2 27+/-2 14+/-2 21 +/-2 24+/-2 30+/-2 23+/-2 32 +/-3 15+/-2 22+/-2 22+/-2 27+/-3 28+/-2 14+/-2 23+/-2 22 +/-2 25+/-2 15+/-2 19+/-2 21 +/-2 23++/-11 33+/-3 27+/-2 38+/-3 19 +/- 2 36+/-3 15+/-2 32+/-3 22+/-2 15+/-2 23+/-3 21 +/- 2 33+/-3 23+/-2 33+/-2 16+/-2 22+/-2 21 +/-2 30+/-3 20+/-2 20+/-3 25+/-2 22+/-2 23+/-2 17+/-2 19+/-2 23+/-2 24+/-11 35+/-3 22+/-2 38+/-3 19 +/- 2 35+/-3 15+/-2 32+/-3 26+/-2 12+/-2 23+/-3 24+/-2 29+/-3 21 +/- 2 31 +/- 3 15+/-2 24+/-2 21 +/- 2 28+/-3 26+/-2 20+/-3 22+/-2 22+/-2 24+/-2 18+/-2 22+/-2 21 +/- 2 24+/- 11 34+/-3 23+/-2 34+/-3 17 + 2 36+/-2 15+/-2 27+/-2 24+/-2 14 +/- 2 23+/-3 24+/-2 30+/-2 22+/-2 33+/-2 15 +/- 2 21 +/- 2 22+/-2 27+/-3 27+/-2 19 +/- 3 26+/-2 20+/-2 24+/-2 15+/-2 17+/-2 20+/-2 23+/-11 34+/-3 23+/-2 40+/-3 15+/-2 38+/-2 17+/-2 32+/-3 20+/-2 13+/-2 19+/-2 24+/-2 26+/-2 24+/-2 31 +/-2 14+/-2 21 +/-2 23+/-2 25+/-3 24+/-2 16 +/- 3 23+/-2 20+/-2 25+/-2 18+/-2 20+/-2 20+/-2 34+/-1 25+/-6 38+/-4 18 +/-4 35+/-4 17+/-5 32+/-8 24+/-6 14+/-3 22 +/-4 24+/-6 30+/-5 23+/-2 32+/-3 15+/-1 22+/-2 22+/-2 28+/-4 25+/-6 19+/-6 24+/-3 21 +/- 2 24+/-1 16+/-2 19 +/-3 21 +/-3 23 +/- 12 GRAND AVERAGE 24 +/- 12 (1) Sampler Malfunction. See Program Deviations.

TABLE C-3 2002 CONCENTRATIONS OF IODINE-131* IN FILTERED AIR Results in Units of 103 pCi/M 3

<------------------------------------------------ STATION ID ---------------------------------------------- >

Control MONTH SA-AI0-14G1 SA.AIO-16E1 SA-AIO-1F1 SA-AIO-2F6 SA-AIO-5D1 SA-AIO-5S1 January February March April May June

<4

<4.2

<2.1

<1.7

<3

<2.7

<4.6

<4.5

<3.5

<1.8

<3.4

<4.4

<3.9

<2.4

<3.3

<1.6

<3.4

<4.6

<4.3

<2.5

<2.2

<3.1

<3.4

<2.4

<1.4

<4.4

<2.6

<6.5

<3.3

<2.8

<1.4

<2.5

<3.1

<2.5

<2.7

<2

< 1.9

<2.4

<3.3

<2.4

<1.8

<7.6

<2.5

<1.8

<6.4

<2.2

<4.3

<3.1

<2.6

<2.3

<3.8

<3

<9.1

<5 (1)

<1.4

<4

<6.4

<4.6

<3.4

<3.8

<1.7

<4.5

<1.2

<2.9

<2.2

<4

<5.2

<5

<4.1

<2.3

<2.5

<1.3

<3.3

<2.2

<3.2

< 3.1

<2.2

<2.4

<3.4

<2.4

<2.4

<3.3

<4.3

<2.5

<6.5

<4.3

<2.2

<2.5

<2.8

<2.8

<3.2

<2.4

<3.1

<3.7

<4.1

<3.1

<4.1

<2.7

<2.7

<4.7

<3.9

<1.3

<3.7

<1.6

<3.2

<3.9

<2.1

<2.1

<2.6

<1.3

<2.5

<2.7

<2.7

<1.8

<1.9

<3.2

<1.6

<6.5

<3.9

<1.9

<3.3

<2.2

<3.1

<3.6

<1.7

<1.5

<3.1

<2.1

<2.6

<3.3

<3.6

<4.3

< 1.7

< 1.9

<2.8

<5.3

<4.5

<2.4

<3.1

<3.3

<2

< 1.5

<3.3

<4

<2.1

<5

<4.3

<3.9

< 1.9

<3.5

<2.4

<2.6

<6.2

<2.9

<2.8

TABLE C-3 2002 CONCENTRATIONS OF IODINE-131* IN FILTERED AIR Results in Units of 10-3 pCi/M 3 STATION ID ---------------------------------------------- >

Control MONTH SA-AIO-14G1 SA-AI0-16E1 SA-AIO-1F1 SA-AIO-2F6 SA-AIO-5D1 SA-AIO-5S1 July

< 4.1

< 1.5

< 4.7

< 1.9

< 4.6

< 5.6

< 2.6

< 3

< 2.1

< 3

< 2.6

< 1.6

< 1.9

< 1.4

< 1.3

< 5

< 2

< 1.6

< 2.8

< 2.7

< 4.7

< 1.4

< 9.7

< 5.6

< 3.1

< 2.4

< 2.2

< 2.4

< 6.9

< 2.2 August September October November

< 3.2

<1.1

< 3.1

< 3.1

< 4.5

< 3.2

< 2.2

< 2.9

< 2.9

< 4.7

< 2.5

< 5.9

< 2.8

< 2.4

< 2.6

< 2.1

< 3.7

< 2.4

< 2.5

< 1.3

< 1.8

< 2.7

< 2.5

< 1.6

< 2.8

< 2.3

< 4.6

< 2.1

< 2.1

< 5.4

< 1.8

< 2.5

< 4.1

< 3.4

< 3.6

< 3.3

< 1.6

< 2.8

< 1.5

< 2.4

< 4.7

< 3.3

< 3.3

< 3.7

< 1.6

< 3.2

< 7

< 3.3

< 2.1

< 3.3

< 2.3

< 1.8

< 2.7

< 2.2

< 2.4

< 3.3

<1.9

< 1.6

< 3.9

< 2

< 3.4

< 2.1

< 3.3

< 2.6

< 1.3

< 4.2

< 4.5

< 3.2

< 3.2

< 2.5

< 2.3

<1.9

< 3.4

< 3.4

< 2

< 3.4

< 2.9

< 2

< 2.6

< 2.9

< 4.8

<0.8

< 4.4

< 1.2

< 7.8

< 2.4

< 1.7

< 2.1

< 1.4

< 6.2

< 1.9

< 3.6

< 4.1

< 2.5

< 1.6

< 4.7

< 2.7

< 1.9

< 1.5

< 5.1

< 2.1

< 2.2 December

< 2.8

< 3.4

< 3.2

< 3.3

< 2.4

< 5

< 1.3

< 1.8

< 2.3

< 2.8

'- < 4.3

< 1.9

<0.9

< 3.3

< 2.4

< 1.8

< 3.1

< 4.3

< 1.7

< 3.4

< 1.2

< 2.2

< 2.1

< 2.2

  • 1-131 results are corrected (1) Sampler Malfunction. See for decay to sample stop date.

Program Deviations.

TABLE C-4 2002 DIRECT RADIATION MEASUREMENTS - QUARTERLY TLD RESULTS Results in mrad/standard month

+1-2 sigma JAN APR JUL OCT QTR STATION to to to to ELEMENTS ID MAR JUN SEP DEC AVG SA-IDM-2S2 5.7+/-07 54+/-05

11) 6.9+/-0.9 60+/-1 5 SA-IDM-5S1 3.5+/-0 4 3.5+/-0 3 3 6+/-0.4 3.6+/-0.4 3 5+/-0.2 SA-IDM-6S2 5.1+/-0 6 4 8+/-0 5 4.7+/-0 4 4 8+/-0.7 4 9+/-0.3 SA-IDM-7S1 5.1+/-0.7 5.5+/-04 5.5+/-0.4 5.5+/-0.6 54+/-0.4 SA-IDM-10S1 4 0+/-0.4 4 2+/-0 5 4.1+/-0 4 3 8+/-0.7 4 0+/-0.3 SA-IDM-1 1S1 3 5+/-0.6 3.7+/-0 4 3.5+/-0 3 2 8+/-0.4 3 4+/-0.7 SA-IDM-4D2 4 2+/-0.5 4 0+/-0 4 4.3+/-0 3 4 0+/-0.5 4 1+/-0.3 SA-lDM-5D1 3.7+/-0.5 3 8+/-0 3 3.9 +/-0.3 3.5+/-0.6 3.7+/-0.4 SA-IDM-10D1 44+/-0.5 45+/-05 4.8+/-03 3.9+/-0.8 44+/-0.7 SA-IDM-14D1 4 0+/-0.4 3 9+/-0 4 3 9+/-0 3 3 9+/-0.4 3 9+/-0.1 SA-IDM-15D1 44+/-0.5 45:+/-O4 47+/-04 4.1+/-07 44+/-05 SA-IDM-2E1 4 1+/-1 0 4 2+/-0 5 4 2 0 4 4.3+/-0 6 4 2+/-0.1 SA-IDM-3E1 3 3+/-0 4 3 3+/-0 3 3 4+/-0.3 3.3+/-0 5 3 4+/-0 1 SA-IDM-9E1 4 2+/-0 6 4 1+/-0 4 4 3+/-0 3 (2) 4 2+/-0 3 SA-IDM-9F1 (2)

(21 (2) 4.5+/-07 45+/-07 SA-IDM-t1E2 4 4+/-0 5 4 4+/-0 4 4 5+/-0 5 4.4+/-0 6 4 4+/-0 1 SA-IDM-12E1 4 4+/-0 4 4 6+/-0 4 4 5+/-0 5 4.3+/-0 5 4 4+/-0 2 SA-IDM-13E1 3 6+/-0 5 3 6+/-0 5 3 7+/-0 3 3.4+/-0 4 3 6+/-0 2 SA-IDM-16E1 4 0+/-0 5 4 2+/-0 4 4 3+/-0 3 4.0+/-0 6 4.1 +/-0 2 SA-IDM-1F1 4 0+/-0 5 4 0+/-0.3 4 3+/-0 3 4 0+/-0 5 4.1+/-0 3 SA-IDM-2F2 3 5+/-O 4 3 5+/-0.5 3 5+/-0 3 3 5+/-0 5 3.5+/-0 1 SA-IDM-2F5 4 3+/-0 7 4 1 +/-0.4 4 5+/-0 6 4 2+/-0 5 4.2+/-0.3 SA-IDM-2F6 3.8+/-0 6 3.9+/-0.4 4 0+/-0.5 3.8+/-0.5 3.9+/-0 1 SA-IDM-3F2 3.5+/-03 3.6+/-04 36+/-0.4 3.5+/-04 36+/-02 SA-IDM-3F3 3.5 +/-0 5 3.5+/-04 34+/-0.4 3 4+/-04 3.5+/-0 1 SA-IDM-4F2 3 4+0 4 3.4+/-0 3 3 6+/-0.5 3 4+/-0.4 3 4+/-0.2 SA-IDM-5F1 3.7+/-0 4 3.7+/-0 3 3 8+/-0.4 3 5+/-0.4 3 7+/-0.2 SA-IDM-6F1 2.9+/-04 2.9+/-0 3 3 0+/-04 3 1+/-0.4 3 0+/-0.2 SA-IDM-7F2 2.7+/-0 3 2.8+/-0 3 2.6+/-0 3 2 7+/-0.3 2 7+/-0.1 SA-IDM-10F2 4 3+/-0.5 4.2 +/-0 3 4.3+/-0 5 4 2+/-0.5 4 3+/-0.1 SA-IDM-11F1 45+/-0.6 44+/-04 4.6+/-04 44+/-0.5 45+/-0.2 SA-IDM-12F1 4 2+/-0.4 4 2+/-0 3 4.3+/-0 3 4 0+/-0.5 4 2+/-0.2 SA-IDM-13F2 4 0+/-0.5 3 9+/-0 3 4.1+/-0 6 3 9+/-0.5 4 0+/-0.2 SA-IDM-13F3 4 1+/-0.4 4 0+/-0 4 4.2+/-0 5 4 0+/-0.4 4 1+/-0.2 SA-IDM-13F4 4 2+/-0.5 4 1 +/-0 3 4 0+/-0 4 4.1 +/-0.6 4 1 +/-0 2 SA-IDM-14F2 4 4+/-0.5 4 5+/-0 3 4 3+/-0 4 4.4+/-0.5 4 4+/-0 2 SA-IDM-15F3 4 6+/-0.5 4 7+/-0 6 4.9+/-0 5 4.5+/-0 4 4 7+/-0 3 SA-IDM-16F2 3 8+/-0.5 3 7+/-0 4 4.0+/-0 4 3.7+/-0 4 3 8+/-0 3 SA-IDM-1G3 (Cl 5 0+/-0.5 49+/-05 5.1+/-06 4.7+/-06 4 9+/-03 SA-IDM-3G1 (CI 4 5+/-1.1 4 3+/-0 5 4 5+/-0 4 4.2+/-0 8 4 4+/-0 3 SA-IDM-10G1(C) 4 2+/-0.4 4 0+/-0 5 4 4+/-0 4 4.1+/-0 4 4 2+/-0 3 SA-IDM-16G1(C) 47+/-0.6 48+/-04 (1) 3.8+/-0.4 45+/-1.1 SA-IDM-3H1 (C) 35+/-0.3 34+/-04 3.5+/-03 34+/-0.4 34+/-0.2 SA-IDM-1S1 4 3+/-0.4 4 4+/-0 4 4 6+/-0 3 4.4+/-0.5 4 4+/-0 2 SA-IDM-3S1 3 3 +/-0.4 3 5 +/-0 3 3.4+/-0 3 3 4+/-0.4 3 4+/-0.2 SA.IDM-2S4 36+/-0.4 36+/-03 3.5+/-04 35+/-0.4 35+/-0.1 SA-IDM-4S1 3 7 +/-0.5 3 8 +/-0 4 4 0+/-0 6 4 0+0.5 3 9+/-0.3 SA-IDM-15S1 34+/-0.6 34+/-03 3.5+/-04 35+/-0.5 34+/-0.2 SA-IDM-16S1 4 3+/-0.4 4 2+/-0 4 4.3+/-0 4 4 4+/-0.6 4 3+/-0.1 SA-IDM-14G1(C) 43+/-0.8 44+/-04 4.5+/-05 42+/-0.5 4.3+/-0.2 AVERAGE 4+/-1.1 4+/-1.1 4.1+/-1 1 4+/-1.3 GRAND AVG 4+/-1.2

  • The standard month = 30 4 days.
  • Quarterly Element TLD results by DESEL.

(C) Control Station 111 TLD'S Not Recovered. See Program Deviations (2) 9E1 TLD Relocated to 9F1 before the 4th quarter 56

TABLE C-5 2002 CONCENTRATIONS OF IODINE-131

  • AND GAMMA EMITTERS** IN MILK Results in Units of pCi/L + /- 2 sigma SAMPLING PERIOD GAMMA EMITTERS STATION ID START STOP 1-131 K-40 SA-MLK-2F9 SA-MLK-1 1F3 SA-MLK-14F4 SA-MLK-3G1 (C)

SA-MLK-2F9 SA-MLK-1 1 F3 SA-MLK-14F4 SA-MLK-3G1 (C)

SA-MLK-2F9 SA-MLK-1 1 F3 SA-MLK-14F4 SA-MLK-3G1 (C)

SA-MLK-2F9 SA-MLK-1 1 F3 SA-MLK-14F4 SA-MLK-3G1 (C)

SA-M LK-2F9 SA-MLK-11 F3 SA-MLK-14F4 SA-MLK-3G1 (C)

SA-MLK-2F9 SA-MLK-1 1 F3 SA-MLK-14F4 SA-MLK-3G1 (C)

SA-MLK-2F9 SA-MLK-13E3 (1)

SA-MLK-14F4 SA-MLK-3G1 (C)

SA-MLK-2F9 SA-MLK-13E3 SA-MLK-14F4 SA-MLK-3G1 (C)

SA-MLK-2F9 SA-MLK-13E3 SA-MLK-14F4 SA-MLK-3G1 (C)

SA-MLK-2F9 SA-MLK-13E3 SA-MLK-14F4 SA-MLK-3G1 (C)

SA-MLK-2F9 SA-MLK-13E3 SA-MLK-14F4 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 01/07/2002 01/08/2002 01/07/2002 01/08/2002 02/04/2002 02/04/2002 02/04/2002 02/03/2002 03/04/2002 03/04/2002 03/04/2002 03/03/2002 04/07/2002 04/07/2002 04/07/2002 04/07/2002 04/21/2002 04/21/2002 04/21/2002 04/20/2002 05/05/2002 05/05/2002 05/05/2002 05/06/2002 05/20/2002 05/22/2002 05/19/2002 05/18/2002 06/03/2002 06103/2002 06/02/2002 06/02/2002 06/17/2002 06/17/2002 06/16/2002 06/17/2002 07/07/2002 07/07/2002 07/08/2002 07/07/2002 07/21/2002 07/21/2002 07/22/2002 07/21/2002 01/08/2002 01/09/2002 01/08/2002 01/09/2002 02/05/2002 02/05/2002 02/05/2002 02/04/2002 03/05/2002 03105/2002 03/05/2002 03/04/2002 04/08/2002 04/08/2002 04/08/2002 04/08/2002 04/22/2002 04/22/2002 04/22/2002 04/22/2002 05/06/2002 05/06/2002 05/06/2002 05/07/2002 05/21/2002 05/23/2002 05/20/2002 05/20/2002 06/04/2002 06/04/2002 06/03/2002 06/03/2002 06/18/2002 06/18/2002 06/17/2002 06/18/2002 07/0812002 07/08/2002 07/09/2002 07/08/2002 07/22/2002 07/2212002 07/23/2002 07/22/2002

<0.2

<0.2

<0.2

<0.3

<0.2

<0.3

<0.2

<0.2

<0.2

<0.2

<0.2

<0.2

<0.3

<0.2

<0.2

<0.2

<0.2

<0.2

<0.2

<0.3

<0.2

<0.2

<0.2

<0.3

<0.3

<0.4

<0.2

<0.2

<0.3

<0.2

<0.3

<0.2

<0.2

<0.3

<0.2

<0.2

<0.2

<0.2

<0.2

<0.2

<0.2

<0.2

<0.3

<0.2 1430 +/- 80 1300 +/-80 1390 +/-90 1300 +/-80 1010 +/- 130 1240 +/- 90 1430 +/-80 1340 +/-90 1370 +/-80 1340 +/-90 1280 +/-70 1350 +/-70 1370 +/-70 1290 +/- 90 1290 +/-80 1410 +/-80 1220 +/-70 1380 +/-80 1360 +/-70 1420 +/- 80 1260 +/-70 1400 +/-80 1310 +/-90 1310 +/-70 1340 +/-80 1360 +/- 70 1340 +/-80 1340 +/-90 1320 +/- 80 1360 +/-70 1340 +/-70 1360 +/- 90 1290 +/- 90 1280 +/-70 1360 +/-80 1360 +/-80 1370 +/-90 1270 +/- 70 1440 +/-70 1380 +/- 80 1430 +/-90 1460 +/-70 1280 +/-80 1320 +/-70 57

TABLE C-5 2002 CONCENTRATIONS OF IODINE-131* AND GAMMA EMITTERS** IN MILK Results in Units of pCi/L +1-2 sigma SAMPLING PERIOD GAMMA EMITTERS STATION ID START STOP 1-131 K-40 SA-MLK-2F9 SA-MLK-13E3 SA-MLK-14F4 SA-MLK-3G1 IC) 08/04/2002 08/04/2002 08/05/2002 08104/2002 08/05/2002 08/05/2002 08/06/2002 08/05/2002

<0.2

<0.2

<0.2

<0.2 1410 +/-70 1440 +70 1310 +/-80 1350 +80 SA-MLK-2F9 SA-MLK-13E3 SA-M LK-14F4 SA-MLK-3G1 IC)

SA-MLK-2F9 SA-MLK-13E3 SA-MLK-14F4 SA-MLK-3G1 IC)

SA-M LK-2F9 SA-MLK-13E3 SA-MLK-14F4 SA-MLK-3G1 {C) 08/18/2002 08/18/2002 08/19/2002 08/18/2002 09/03/2002 09/03/2002 09/02/2002 09/03/2002 09/15/2002 09/15/2002 09/16/2002 09/15/2002 08/19/2002 08/19/2002 08/20/2002 08/19/2002 09/04/2002 09/04/2002 09/03/2002 09/04/2002 09/16/2002 09/1612002 09/17/2002 09/16/2002

<0.3

<0.2

<0.2

<0.2

<0.2

<0.2

<0.2

<0.2

<0.2

<0.2

<0.2

<0.2 1390 +/-80 1320 +/- 80 1400 +/-80 1300 +/-70 1470 +/- 80 1380 +80 1290 +/-70 1440 +/-80 1430 +/-70 1440 +/-70 1350 +/-80 1170 +/-70 SA-MLK-2F9 SA-MLK-13E3 SA-MLK-14F4 SA-MLK-3G1 (C)

SA-MLK-2G3 (1)

SA-MLK-13E3 SA-MLK-14F4 SA-MLK-3G1 (C)

SA-MLK-2G3 SA-MLK-13E3 SA-MLK-14F4 SA-MLK-3G1 IC)

SA-MLK-2G3 SA-MLK-13E3 SA-MLK-14F4 SA-MLK-3G1 IC)

SA-MLK-2G3 SA-MLK-13E3 SA-MLK-14F4 SA-MLK-3G1 IC) 10/07/2002 10/06/2002 10/06/2002 10/06/2002 10/22/2002 10/21/2002 10/20/2002 10/20/2002 11/11/2002 11/12/2002 11/11/2002 11/12/2002 11/24/2002 11/24/2002 11/25/2002 11/24/2002 12/08/2002 12/08/2002 12/09/2002 12/08/2002 10/08/2002 10/07/2002 10/07/2002 10/07/2002 10/23/2002 10/22/2002 10/21/2002 10/21/2002 11/12/2002 11/13/2002 11/12/2002 11/13/2002 11/25/2002 11/25/2002 11/26/2002 11/25/2002 12/09/2002 12/09/2002 12/10/2002 12/09/2002

<0.2

<0.2

<0.2

<0.2

<0.2

<0.2

<0.3

<0.3

<0.2

<0.2

<0.2

<0.2

<0.3

<0.2

<0.2

<0.2

<0.3

<0.2

<0.2

<0.2 1310 +/-70 1360 +80 1310 +/-80 1300 +/-+70 1320 +/-80 1410 +/-90 1320 +/-90 1350 +/-70 1330 +/-70 1360 +/-80 1300 +/-80 1320 +/-70 1290 +/-90 1370 +/-70 1370 +/-90 1370 +/-70 1400 +/-90 1430 +/-80 1370 +/-80 1320 +/-80 1350 +/-140 AVERAGE

  • lodine-131 results are corrected for decay to midpoint of collection period & analyzed to a sensitivity of 1.0 pCi/L.
    • All other gamma emitters searched for were <LLD; typical LLDs are given in Table C-19.
      • Monthly sample collected during Jan., Feb., March and Dec., when animals are not on pasture IC) Control Station (1) Two Milk Farms were replaced. See Program Changes.

58

TABLE C-6 2002 CONCENTRATIONS OF GROSS ALPHA AND GROSS BETA EMITTERS, AND TRITIUM IN WELL WATER Results in Units of pCi/L +1-2 sigma SAMPLING GROSS GROSS STATION ID DATE ALPHA BETA TRITIUM SA-WWA-3E 1 SA-WWA-3E 1 SA-WWA-3E 1 SA-WWA-3E 1 SA-WWA-3E 1 SA-WWA-3E 1 SA-WWA-3E 1 SA-WWA-3E 1 SA-WWA-3E 1 SA-WWA-3E 1 SA-WWA-3E1 SA-WWA-3E 1 01/28/2002 02/25/2002 03/25/2002 04/30/2002 05/28/2002 06/24/2002 07/29/2002 08/26/2002 09/30/2002 10/29/2002 11/26/2002 12/30/2002

<1.6

< 1.1 2.1 +/-1 3 +/- 1.4 1.8 +/-1.1 2.8 +/-1.2 1.5 +/-1.2

<1.7 2.8++/-1.3 2.7++/-1.4 1.8 +/- 1 2.4+/-1.3 13 +/-1 12 +/- 1 13+/-1 11 +/-0.8 11 +/-0.8 11 +/-0.8 11 +/-0.8 11 +/-0.8 10 +/-0.8 11 +/-0.8 11 +/-0.8 10+/- 0.8

< 180

< 180

< 170

< 160

< 160

< 160

<180

< 160

<150

< 170

< 160

< 150 AVERAGE 2.1 +/-1.3 11 +/-2 59

TABLE C-7 2002 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN WELL WATER Results in Units of pCI/L +1-2 sigma SAMPLING

<-----GAMMA EMITTERS ----- >

STATION ID DATE K-40 RA-NAT SA-WWA-3E1 SA-WWA-3E1 SA-WWA-3E1 SA-WWA-3E 1 SA-WWA-3E 1 SA-WWA-3E1 SA-WWA-3 E1 SA-WWA-3E 1 SA-WWA-3E 1 SA-WWA-3E1 SA-WWA-3 E1 SA-WWA-3E1 01/28/2002 02/25/2002 03/25/2002 04/30/2002 05/28/2002 06/24/2002 07/29/2002 08/26/2002 09/30/2002 10/2912002 11/26/2002 12/30/2002

<15 58 +/- 20

<40

<7

<12 56 +/- 15

<18

<17

<17 46 +/-15 43+/-16

<54 168+/- 5 150+/-4 164+/-+

4 153 +/-6 176+/-6 68+/-+3 67+/-3 62+/-4 110+/-4 53+/-3,

40+/-3 133+/-5 AVERAGE 112+/-+102

  • All other gamma emitters searched for were <LLD; typical LLDs are given in Table C-19.

60

TABLE C-8 2002 CONCENTRATIONS OF GROSS ALPHA AND GROSS BETA EMITTERS AND TRITIUM IN RAW AND TREATED POTABLE WATER Results in Units of pCi/L +/- 2 sigma SAMPLING GROSS GROSS TYPE PERIOD ALPHA BETA TRITIUM RAW 1/1-31/2002

<0.7 3+/-0.6

<180 TREATED 1/1-31/2002

<1.1 4.9 +/-0.7

<170 RAW 2/1-28/2002 0.8+/-0.5 3.3+/-0.6

<170 TREATED 2/1-28/2002 0.9 +0.7 2.9 +/-0.6

<170 RAW 3/1-31/2002 1 +/-0.5 3.1 +/-0.6

<180 TREATED 3/1-31/2002 1 +/-0.7 3.9 +/-0.6

<170 RAW 4/1-30/2002 1.2+/-0.7 2.8+/-0.5

<150 TREATED 4/1-30/2002

<1 2.8+/-0.5

<160 RAW 5/1-31/2002 0.8 +/-0.6 3.2+/-0.5

<160 TREATED 5/1-31/2002 1 +/-0.7 3.1 +/-0.5

<150 RAW 6/1-30/2002 1.4+/-0.7 3.6+/-0.5

<150 TREATED 6/1-30/2002

<0.7 3.7 +/-0.5

<160 RAW 7/1-31/2002 1.3+0.7 3.9+/-0.5

<160 TREATED 7/1-31/2002

<0.9 3.4+/-0.5

<160 RAW 8/1-31/2002

<0.8 3.3+/-0.5

<160 TREATED 8/1-31/2002

<1.4 3.7+/-0.6

<160 RAW 9/1-30/2002 0.9 +/-0.5 2.6+/-0.5

<150 TREATED 9/1-30/2002 1.6+/-1 3.4+/-0.5

<150 RAW 10/1-31/2002 1.3+/-1 2.9 +/-0.5

<160 TREATED 10/1-31/2002

<0.8 3.3+/-0.5

<160 RAW 11/1-30/2002 2+/-0.8 4+/-0.5

<160 TREATED 11/1-30/2002

<1 3.6+/-0.5

<150 RAW 12/1-31/2002 1.4+/-0.7 3.5+/-0.5

<150 TREATED 12/1-31/2002 1.1 +/-0.7 3.2 +/-0.5

<150 AVERAGE RAW 1.2+/-0.8 3.3+/-0.9 TREATED 1 +/-0.5 3.5 +/-1.1 GRAND AVERAGE 1.1 +0.6 3.4 +1 61

TABLE C-9 2002 CONCENTRATIONS OF I0DINE-131* AND GAMMA EMITTERS**

IN RAW AND TREATED POTABLE WATER Results in Units of pCi/L +/- 2 sigma TYPE RAW TREATED RAW TREATED RAW TREATED RAW TREATED RAW TREATED RAW TREATED RAW TREATED RAW TREATED RAW TREATED RAW TREATED RAW TREATED RAW TREATED AVERAGES RAW TREATED GRAND AVERAGE SAMPLING PERIOD 1/1-31/2002 1/1-31/2002 2/1-28/2002 2/1-28/2002 3/1-31/2002 3/1 -31/2002 4/1-30/2002 4/1-30/2002 5/1-31/2002 5/1-31/2002 6/1-30/2002 6/1-30/2002 7/1-31/2002 7/1-31/2002 8/1-31/2002 8/1-31/2002 9/1-30/2002 9/1-30/2002 10/1-31 /2002 10/1-3112002 11/1-30/2002 11/1-30/2002 12/1-31/2002 12/1-31/2002 1-131

<0.3

<0.3

<0.2

<0.3

<0.2

<0.2

<0.2

<0.2

<0.3

<0.2

<0.2

<0.2

<0.2

<0.2

<0.4

<0.2

<0.2

<0.3

<0.2

<0.2

<0.3

<0.2

<0.4

<0.3 GAMMA EMITTERS -----

K-40 RA-NAT 51 +/-23

<3 50+ 17

<3

< 16

<2

<36

<2 62+/-11

<2 44+21

<2

<15

<3

<36

<2

<9

<2

<15

<2

<14

<2 45+/-17

<5

<15

<2 65+/-15

<6

<14

<2

<15 6 +/- 2

<16

<4

<28 42+/-3

<22

<3

<18 13+4

<12

<2 44+/-14

<4 58+/-21 5+/-2

<30

<2

  • lodine-1 31 analyzed to a sensitivity of 1.0 pCi/L.
    • All other gamma emitters searched for were <LLD; typical LLDs are given in Table C-19.

62

TABLE C-10 2002 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS* IN VEGETABLES Results in Units of pCi/kg (Wet) +/- 2 sigma SAMPLING

<--- GAMMA EMITTERS --- >

STATION ID DATE SAMPLE TYPE K-40 Ra-NAT SA-FPV-2F9 SA-FPV-3H5 (C) 04/22/2002 04/22/2002 Asparagus Asparagus 2250+/- 207 2510+251

< 1 1 38 +/- 14 AVERAGE 2380 +/- 370 SA-FPL-14F3 SA-FPL-2F4 SA-FPL-3H5 (C)

SA-FPL-6F2 07/25/2002 07/25/2002 07/22/2002 07/2512002 Cabbage Cabbage Cabbage Cabbage 2710+/-+ 182 3030+ 155 2280 +/- 165 2950 +/- 170

<15

< 7.2

< 7.2

< 6.4 AVERAGE 2740 +/- 670 SA-FPV-3F5 SA-FPV-14G2 (C)

SA-FPV-1 G 1 (C)

SA-FPV-2F4 SA-FPV-2F9 SA-FPV-2G2 (C)

SA-FPV-3H5 (C) 07/25/2002 07/25/2002 07/22/2002 07/15/2002 07/15/2002 07/15/2002 07/15/2002 Corn Corn Corn Corn Corn Corn Corn 2470 +/- 165 2550+/-164 2210+/- 147 2340 +/- 164 2350 +/- 163 2140+/-150 2460 +/- 166

< 7.1

< 7.2

< 6.6

< 7.4

< 6.3

< 8.3

< 5.8 AVERAGE 2360 +/- 290 SA-FPV-14F3 SA-FPV-2G2 (C)

SA-FPV-3F5 SA-FPV-3H5 (C)

SA-FPV-9G1 (C) 07/25/2002 07/23/2002 07/25/2002 07/22/2002 07/25/2002 Peppers Peppers Peppers Peppers Peppers 1670 +/-157 1320 +/- 144 1620 +/- 178 1410++/-161 1530 +/- 166

<20

< 8.2

<12

<10

< 8.8 AVERAGE 1510 + 290 SA-FPV-2F9 SA-FPV-14F3 SA-FPV-14G2 (C)

SA-FPV-1G1 (C)

SA-FPV-2G2 (C)

SA-FPV-3F5 SA-FPV-3H5 (C)

SA-FPV-9G1 (C) 07/15/2002 07/25/2002 07/25/2002 07/22/2002 07/15/2002 07/25/2002 07/15/2002 07/25/2002 Tomatoes Tomatoes Tomatoes Tomatoes Tomatoes Tomatoes Tomatoes Tomatoes 2230 +/- 146 2050 +/-144 1890 +/-73 2330 +/- 158 1700 +/- 158 2530 +/- 82 2150 +/- 77 2150 + 178

< 5.5

< 6.7

< 6

< 7.7

< 13

< 1 1

< 6.2

<16 AVERAGE 2130 + 510 GRAND AVERAGE 2190 +/- 880

  • All other gamma emitters searched for were <LLD; typical LLDs are given in Table C-1 9 (C) Control Station 63

TABLE C-1 1 2002 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS* IN GAME Results in Units of pCi/kg (wet) +/- 2 sigma SAMPLING GAMMA EMITTERS STATION ID DATE SAMPLE TYPE K-40 SA-GAM-1 1 D1 (C)

SA-GAM-3E1 02/19/2002 02/19/2002 Muskrat Muskrat 2580 +/-160 3240 +/- 190 AVERAGE Muskrat 2910+/-930

  • AII other gamma emitters searched for were <LLD; typical LLDs are given in Table C-19 64

TABLE C-12 2002 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS* IN FODDER CROPS Results in Units of pCi/kg (wet) +/- 2 sigma SAMPLING

<- GAMMA EMITTERS ->

STATION ID DATE SAMPLE TYPE Be-7 K-40 Ra-NAT SA-VGT--2F9 SA-VGT-3G1 (C)

SA-VGT-1 4F4 SA-VGT-2G3 10/08/2002 10/07/2002 10/07/2002 10/01/2002 Silage Silage Silage Silage

<390 390+/- 120 140 +/-40 340+/-100 2630+/-180 9780 +/-370 3960 +/-220 14800+/-460

<8.6

<9.4

<9.4 23+/-9 AVERAGE 310+/-240 7790+/-11220 SA-VGT-14F4 SA-VGT-3G1 (C) 11/12/2002 11/25/2002 Soybeans Soybeans

<46

<23 14100+/-270 14600 +/- 280

<15

<7 AVERAGE 14400+/-700

  • All other gamma emitters searched for were <LLD; typical LLDs are given in Table C-19.

(C) Location 3G1 is the Control Station.

65

TABLE C-13 2002 CONCENTRATIONS OF GROSS BETA EMITTERS IN SURFACE WATER Results in Units of pCi/L +/- 2 sigma STATION ID -------------------------------------------------- >

SAMPLING SA-SWA-1 1A1 SA-SWA-12C1 SA-SWA-16F1 SA-SWA-1F2 SA-SWA-7E1 AVERAGE DATE (Control)

January February March April May June July August September October November December AVERAGE 153+/-13 143i+/-12 82++/-10 80+/-9 48+/-7 48+/-7 74+/-8 110 +/-10 142+/- 11 133+/-11 69+/-8 73+/-8 96 +/- 76 156+/- 13 110+/-11 66+/-9 49+/-8 25+/-6 41 +/- 7 57+/-7 83+/-9 111 +/- 10 100 +/- 10 48+/-7 59+/-7 76 +/- 75 99 10 79+/-9 38+/-8 37+/-7 19+/-5 6+/-4 21 +/- 5 80+/-8 91 +/-9 92+/-9 40+/-6 40+/-6 53 +/- 65 107 +/- 11 96+/-10 33+/-7 23+/-7 13+/-5 15+/-5 27+/-6 72+/-8 83+/-8 81 +/- 9 32+/-6 25+/-5 51 +/- 69 168 +/-13 123i+/-11 125 +/-11 90+/- 10 72+/-8 71 +/-8 79+/-8 114+/-10 146+/- 11 161 +/-12 90+/-9 88+/-9 136+/- 62 110+/-49 69 +/- 75 56+/- 57 35 +/-48 36 +/- 52 52 +/- 54 92 +/- 38 114+/-57 113+/-66 56 +/- 47 57 +/- 50 110+/- 68 GRAND AVERAGE 77 +/-83

TABLE C-14 2002 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS* IN SURFACE WATER Results in Units of pCi/L +/- 2 sigma SAMPLING GAMMA EMITTERS STATION ID DATE K-40 SA-SWA-1 F2 SA-SWA-7E 1 SA-SWA-1 1 Al SA-SWA-1 2C1 (C)

SA-SWA-1 6F1 SA-SWA-1 F2 SA-SWA-7E1 SA-SWA-11 Al SA-SWA-12C1 (C)

SA-SWA-1 6F1 SA-SWA-1 F2 SA-SWA-7E1 SA-SWA-1 lAl SA-SWA-1 2C1 (C)

SA-SWA-16F1 SA-SWA-l F2 SA-SWA-7E 1 SA-SWA-1l1Al SA-SWA-1 2C1 (C)

SA-SWA-1 6F1 SA-SWA-1 F2 SA-SWA-7E 1 SA-SWA-1 AAl SA-SWA-1 2C1 (C)

SA-SWA-16F1 SA-SWA-1 F2 SA-SWA-7E 1 SA-SWA-11 Al SA-SWA-1 2C1 (C)

SA-SWA-16F1 SA-SWA-1 F2 SA-SWA-7E 1 SA-SWA-1 AAl SA-SWA-1 2C1 (C)

SA-SWA-1 6F1 01/09/2002 01/09/2002 01/09/2002 01/09/2002 01/09/2002 02/06/2002 02/06/2002 02/06/2002 02/06/2002 02/06/2002 03/07/2002 03/07/2002 03/07/2002 03/07/2002 03/07/2002 04/10/2002 04/10/2002 04/10/2002 04/10/2002 04/10/2002 05/11/2002 05/11/2002 05/11/2002 05/11/2002 05/11/2002 06/05/2002 06/05/2002 06/05/2002 06/05/2002 06/05/2002 07/08/2002 07/08/2002 07/08/2002 07/08/2002 07/08/2002 114+/-19 169 +/- 30 193+/- 26 141 +/-27 114+/-25 113+/-16 153 +/- 22 175 +/- 19 140+/-24 119+/-25 96 +/- 24 115+/-21 113 +/- 22 80 +/- 15 90 +/- 26 52 +/-17 117+/- 18 83 +/- 29 64 +/-16 80 +/- 26 64 +/- 21 110+/-23

<36

<18

<23 69 +/-19 87 +/- 20 89 +/- 28 46 +/- 21

<17

<17 77 +/- 24

<13 50 +/- 18 65 +/- 21 67

TABLE C-14 2002 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS* IN SURFACE WATER Results in Units of pCi/L +/- 2 sigma SAMPLING GAMMA EMITTERS STATION ID DATE K-40 SA-SWA-1 F2 SA-SWA-7E1 SA-SWA-1 1 Al SA-SWA-l 2C1 (C)

SA-SWA-16F1 SA-SWA-1 F2 SA-SWA-7E 1 SA-SWA-l 1Al SA-SWA-l 2C1 (C)

SA-SWA-l 6F1 SA-SWA-l F2 SA-SWA-7E1 SA-SWA-1 Al SA-SWA-12C1 (C)

SA-SWA-16F1 SA-SWA-1 F2 SA-SWA-7E 1 SA-SWA-1 Al SA-SWA-1 2C1 (C)

SA-SWA-1 6F1 SA-SWA-1 F2 SA-SWA-7E 1 SA-SWA-1 1 Al SA-SWA-112C11(C)

SA-SWA-16F1 08/09/2002 08/09/2002 08/09/2002 08/09/2002 08/09/2002 09/06/2002 09/06/2002 09/06/2002 09/06/2002 09/06/2002 10/13/2002 10/13/2002 10/13/2002 10/13/2002 10/13/2002 11/13/2002 11/13/2002 11/13/2002 11/13/2002 11/1312002 12/12/2002 12/12/2002 12/12/2002 12/12/2002 12/12/2002 62+/-20 200 +/- 28 177+/- 27 96 +/- 20 71 +/-15 127 + 20 189 +/-28 126 +/- 27 90+/-19 162+/- 27 122+/- 28 137 +/-27 167+/- 24 92+/- 29 95+/-24 66+/- 11 117+/-23 122+/- 29 88 +/-21 62+/-13 57++/-18 150+/- 34 101 +/-20 119+33 62 +15 99 +/- 93 AVERAGE

  • All other gamma emitters searched for were <LLD; typical LLDs are given in Table C-1 9.

C) Control Station 68

TABLE C-1 5 2002 CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM IN QUARTERLY COMPOSITES OF SURFACE WATER Results in Units of pCi/L +/- 2 sigma SAMPLING PERIOD

<---------------------------------------------------- STATION ID------------------------------------------->

SA-SWA-11A1 SA-SWA-12C1 SA-SWA-16F1 SA-SWA-1F2 SA-SWA-7E1 AVERAGE (Control) 01/09/2002 to 03/07/2002 04/10/2002 to 06/05/2002 07/08/2002 to 09/06/2002 10/13/2002 to 12/12/2002

< 190 197+/- 99

< 160

<170

< 190

< 160

< 170

< 170

< 200

< 160

< 170

< 160

< 190

< 160

<170

< 160

< 200

< 160

< 160

< 170

TABLE C-16 2002 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS*'

IN EDIBLE FISH Results in Units of pCi/kg (wet) +/- 2 sigma GAMMA EMITTERS (FLESH)

SAMPLING I

STATION ID PERIOD K-40 SA-ESF-7E1 SA-ESF-1 1 Al SA-ESF-12C1 (C) 5/16-21/2002 5/16-21/2002 5/16-21/2002 3190+/-230 3300 +/- 200 3630+/- 200 AVERAGE 3370 +/-460 SA-ESF-7E1 SA-ESF-11 Al SA-ESF-12C1 (C) 09/26/2002 10/1-3/2002 9/26-10/01/2002 3680+/-210 3980+/- 200 4020+/- 210 AVERAGE 3890+/- 370 GRAND AVERAGE 3630 +/- 680

    • All other gamma emitters searched for were <LLD; typical LLDs are given in Table C-19 (C) Control Station 70

TABLE C-17 2002 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS* IN CRABS Results in Units of pCi/kg (wet) +/- 2 sigma GAMMA EMITTER SAMPLING (FLESH)

STATION ID PERIOD K-40 SA-ECH-1 1 Al SA-ECH-12C1 (C) 09/23-26/2002 09/23-26/2002 3050+/- 190 3010+/-220 AVERAGE 3030 +/- 60 GRAND AVERAGE 3030 +/- 60

  • All other gamma emitters searched for were <LLD; Typical LLDs are given in Table C-19.

(C) Control Station 71

TABLE C-18 2002 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS* IN SEDIMENT Results in Units of pCi/kg (dry) +/- 2 sigma SAMPLING

<------------------------------------- GAMMA EMITTERS ------------------------------------- >

STATION ID DATE Be-7 K-40 Co-60 Cs-1 34 Cs-137 RA NAT Th-232 SA-ESS-6S2 SA-ESS-1 1 Al SA-ESS-1 5A1 SA-ESS-16A1 SA-ESS-12C1 (C)

SA-ESS-7E1 SA-ESS-16F1 06/24/2002 06/12/2002 06/12/2002 06/12/2002 06/12/2002 06/12/2002 06/12/2002

<60

<140

< 160 1640 +/- 300

<90

< 130

<670 1410 +/-60 15300+/-410 16400 +/- 510 15000 +/- 500 10200 +/- 370 12100 +/-180 14500 +/- 380

<4

<13

<51

<17

<8

<10

<7

<2

<7

<15

<19

<5

<7

<6 8 +/- 3 119+/- 20 110+/-20 67 +/-20

<29 32+/-6 46+/-14 80+/-4 610+/-30 580 +/-30 620+/-30 590+/- 30 800+/-10 610+/-30 90+/-10 1080+/- 60 1060+/-70 840 +/- 100 800 +/- 50 980+/-30 850+/-60 AVERAGE

-'-I SA-ESS-6S2 SA-ESS-1 1Al SA-ESS-1 5Al SA-ESS-16A1 SA-ESS-1 2C1 (C)

SA-ESS-7E 1 SA-ESS-16F1 12100 +/- 10400 59+/-84 560+/-450 810i680 10/29/2002 10/29/2002 10/29/2002 10/29/2002 10/28/2002 10/28/2002 10/28/2002

<90

<60

<90

<60

< 160

<60

< 170 1310+/- 110 15900 +/- 250 11500+/-660 7760 +/- 290 13700 i 380 16800 +/- 230 16300+/-470

<4

<33

<12 53+/-9

<10

<44

<9

<2

<8

<7

<5

<7

<6

<6

<5 100+/- 10 97 +/-19 29 +/- 11

<41

<29

<9 100+/- 10 610+/- 10 530+/-30 540+/- 20 790 +/- 20 710 +/-10 530+/- 30 100+/-30 1060+/-30 960 +/- 60 630 +/- 60 930 +/- 70 1130+/-40 990+/-70 AVERAGE 11900+/- 11300 540+/-440 830 +/-720 GRAND AVERAGE 12000 +/-10400 550+/-430 820+/-670

  • All other gamma emitters searched for were <LLD; typical LLDs are given in Table C-19 (C) Control Station I

TABLE C-19 2002 MAPLEWOOD TESTING SERVICES LLDs FOR GAMMA SPECTROSCOPY SAMPLE TYPE:

<-------AIR

<---------WATER---------->

<----------MILK--------->

IODINE PARTICULATES GAMMA SCAN IODINE GAMMA SCAN IODINE ACTIVITY:

10-3 pCi/m3 103 pCi/m 3

pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L GEOMETRY:

47 ML 13 FILTERS 3.5 LITER 100 ML 3.5 LITER 100 ML COUNT TIME:

120 MINS 500 MINS 1000 MIN 1000 MINS 500 MINS 1000 MINS DELAY TO COUNT:

2 DAYS 5 DAYS 7 DAYS 3 DAYS 2 DAYS 2 DAYS NUCLIDES BE-7 NA-22 K-40 CR-51 MN-54 CO-58 FE-59 CO-60 ZN-65 ZRNB-95 MO-99 RU-103 RU-106 AG-110M SB-125 TE-129M I-131 TE-132 BA-133 CS-134 CS-136 CS-137 BALA-140 CE-141 CE-144 RA-NAT TH-232 7.6 0.6 13 3.5 0.72 0.23 0.80 0.33 0.77 0.46 27 0.18 3.0 0.41 0.46 7.3 0.40

0. 62 0.46 0.34 0.46 0.37 1.2 0.25 0.52 0.42 3.9 13 4

30 9.1 0.9 0.9 4.8 2.0 2.9 1.8 56

1. 0 13 2.3 2.5 41 2.0 3.1 1.2
1. 0 1.6 2.1 6.2 1.3 5.5 6.5 8.9 16 8.9 50 12 3.8 2.2 8.5 5.9 9.5 3.3 52 1.6 17 3.0 5.0 94 2.0 3.4 1.6 1.8 2.5 2.5 6.4 2.7 12 7.9 22 9.1 0.4 0 5 73

TABLE C-19 (Cont'd) 2002 MAPLEWOOD TESTING SERVICES LLDs FOR GAMMA SPECTROSCOPY SAMPLE TYPE:

FOOD PRODUCTS VEGETATION GAME FISH & SHELLFISH SEDIMENT & SOIL ACTIVITY-pCi/kg WET pCi/kg WET pCi/kg WET pCi/kg WET pCi/kg DRY GEOMETRY:

1 500 ml 3.5 LITER 500 ml 500 ml 500 ml COUNT TIME:

500 MINS 500 MINS 500 MINS 500 MINS 500 MINS DELAY TO COUNT:

3 DAYS 7 DAYS 5 DAYS 5 DAYS 30 DAYS NUCLIDES BE-7 NA-22 K-40 CR-51 MN-54 CO-58 FE-59 CO-60 ZN-65 ZRNB-95 MO-99 RU-103 RU-106 AG-110M SB-125 TE-129M I-131 TE-132 BA-133 CS-134 CS-136 CS-137 BALA-140 CE-141 CE-144 RA-NAT TH-232 47 17 70 45 8 9 7.1 26 12.5 16 13 963 4.4 51 10 15 238

9. 0
14. 0 4.6 5.6 6.1 7.1 28 60 24 13 45 46 32 70 34 6.6 6.4 21 12 21 41 41 9.5 21 10 14 464 31 14 7.1 5.2 1.8 8.3 81
1. 0 32 22 55 60 10 70 28 10 3.1 9.0 8.1 7.9 9.4 44 2.8 54 3.8 11 166 3.2 2.9 3.9 4.1 2.9 4.9
12. 6 4.3 18 7.1 26 36 9.6 70 31 6.1 6.3 20 7.0 12 158 22 70 275 41 17 82 53 24 11 1350 5.1 46 8.8 8.9 167 43 4.0 4.3 9.2 7.2 12 28 6.2 20 11 45 60 16700

-24 95 35 24 315 143 1082 11 15 60 33 90 31 59 45 50 74

APPENDIX D

SUMMARY

OF RESULTS FROM ANALYTICS AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOCIATES INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAMS 75

APPENDIX D

SUMMARY

OF RESULTS FOR ANALYTICS AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOCIATES INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM Appendix D presents a summary of the analytical results for the 2002 Analytics and Environmental Resource Associates (ERA)

Interlaboratory Comparison Program.

TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE NO.

TABLE DESCRIPTION PAGE D-1 D-2 D-3 D-4 Gross Alpha and Gross Beta Emitters in Water....

Gamma Emitters in Water and Milk.................

79 80 Gamma Emitters in Air and Soil...................

Tritium Analysis in Water and Iodine Analysis in Air and Water.................................

81 82 77

TABLE D-1 RESULTS FOR ANALYTICS AND ERA INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM Gross Alpha and Gross Beta Emitters In Water (pCi/L)

DATE MM-YY 06-2002 PSEG SAMPLE CODE ANL-WAT-AB549 MlsDIUM ANALYSIS Water Alpha Beta Water Alpha Beta Water Alpha Beta 11-2002 ERA-WAT-AB553 09-2002 ANL-WAT-AB554 12-2002 ANL-WAT-AB559 PSEG Mean + s.d.

34+/-8 298+5 8.9+0.6 42.2+2.4 2. 7+/-0. 6 247+/-4 78+/-3 231+/-3 ANALYTICS ERA Known 40 280 12.2 47 92 239 84 216 ANALYTICS/ERA Acceptance Criteria Lower & Upper Limit Limit 30 50 196 364 3.5 20.9 38.3 55.7 62 122 167 311 51 108 150 282 Water Alpha Beta

  • s.d. -

one standard deviation of three individual analytical results 79

TABLE D-2 RESULTS FOR ANALYTICS AND ERA INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM Gamma Emitters In Water and Milk (pCi/L)

ANALYTICS/ERA Acceptance ANALYTICS Criteria DATE PSEG PSEG ERA Lower & Upper MM-YY SAMPLE CODE MEDIUM ANALYSIS Mean + s.d.

Known Limit Limit 03-2002 ANL-WAT-G544 Water Cr-51 188+40 198 Mn-54 179+8 166 Fe-59 99+10 86 Co-60 116+3 117 Zn-65 159+/-7 164 I-131 62+7 61 Cs-137 206+2 197 Ce-141 250+4 242 03-2002 ANL-MLK-G546 Milk Cr-51 273+31 267 Mn-54 232+6 224 Fe-59 129+6 116 Co-60 154+/-11 158 Zn-65 241+/-10 221 I-131 92+6 92 Cs-134 114+/-1 122 Cs-137 261+/-10 266 Ce-141 320+/-14 326 12-2002 ANL-WAT-G561 Water Cr-51 362+17 331 Mn-54 153+6 136 Fe-59 84+/-9 69 Co-58 142+/-9 133 Co-60 165+5 157 Zn-65 190+5 171 I-131 103+5 94 Cs-134 93+/-1 95 Cs-137 227+3 210 Ce-141 116+5 106

  • s.d. -

one standard deviation of three individual analytical results 138 118 62 81 116 43 137 170 189 158 80 110 155 62 86 188 230 229 94 51 91 109 117 64 65 144 76 258 214 110 153 212 79 257 314 345 290 152 206 287 122 158 344 422 433 178 87 175 205 225 124 125 276 136 80

TABLE D-3 RESULTS OF ANALYTICS AND ERA INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM Gamma Emitters In Soil (pCi/Kg-dry) and Air Particulate Samples (pCi/m 3

)

DATE MM-YY PSEG SAMPLE CODE PSEG ANALYSIS Mean + s.d.

ANALYTICS ERA Known ANALYTICS/ERA Acceptance Criteria Lower & Upper Limit Limit MEDIUM 03-2002 ANL-SOL-G545 Soil Cr-51 323+21 314 Mn-54 290+7 263 Fe-59 149+/-10 136 Co-60 198+7 185 Zn-65 263+20 259 Cs-137 459+/-2 439 Ce-141 392+7 383 06-2002 ANL-APT-G551 APT Cr-51 188+10 186 Mn-54 85+5 75 Co-60 101+4 99 Fe-59 75+4 64 Zn-65 165+11 142 Cs-134 82+5 95 Cs-137 79+5 72 Co-58 83+4 79 Ce-141 75+1 71 09-2002 ANL-SOL-G556 Soil Cr-51 348+37 354 Mn-54 252+3 238 Fe-59 148+11 138 Co-58 156+2 151 Co-60 225+3 232 Zn-65 302+21 293 Cs-137 296+20 282 Ce-141 241+7 249 Cs-134 193+9 205 s.d.

one standard deviation of three individual analytical results 218 185 94 131 181 307 269 132 51 69 46 100 65 48 55 47 246 166 96 103 160 203 198 177 145 410 341 178 239 337 571 497 240 99 129 82 184 125 96 103 95 462 310 180 199 304 383 366 321 265 81

TABLE D-4 RESULTS OF ANALYTICS AND ERA INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM Tritium Analysis In Water (pCi/L)

Iodine-131 Analysis In Water (pCi/L)

And Iodine In Air Samples (pCi/m3 )

ANALYTICS/ERA Acceptance ANALYTICS Criteria DATE PSEG PSEG ERA Lower & Upper MM-YY SAMPLE CODE MEDIUM ANALYSIS Mean +,s.d.

Known Limit Limit 03 -2 002 03 -2002 06-2002 06-2002 09-2002 09-2 002 11-2002 11-2002 12-2002 12-2002 ANL-WAT-H543 ANL-AIO-I547 ANL-AIO-I550 ANL-WAT-H552 ANL-AIO-I555 ANL-WAT-H557 ERA-WAT-H563 ERA-WAT-I558 ANL-WAT-H562 ANL-AIO-I560 Water AIO AIO Water AIO Water Water Water Water Water H-3 I-131 I-131 H-3 I-131 H-3 H-3 I-131 H-3 I-131 10902+398 78+0 90+/-4 7253+110 82+2 12379+338 92 85+/-3 12 6.99+0.2 6497+/-220 90+/-1 10026 77 93 6970 81 11967 10200 6.76 5987 95 7020 53 63 4876 57 8379 8433 3.3 41 93 65 13032 101 123 9064 105 15555 11967 10.2 7781 125

  • s.d.

one standard deviation of three individual analytical results 82

APPENDIX E SYNOPSIS OF LAND USE CENSUS 83

APPENDIX E SYNOPSIS OF 2002 LAND USE CENSUS A land use census was conducted to identify, within a distance of 8 km (5 miles), the location of the nearest milk animal, the nearest residence, and the nearest garden of greater than 5Cm2 (500ft2) producing broad leaf vegetation, in each of the 16 meteorological sectors.

Tabulated below are the results of these surveys:

Meteorological Sector Milk Animal July, 2002 km (miles)

Nearest Residence July, 2002 km (miles)

Vegetable Garden July, 2002 km (miles)

N NNE NE ENE E

ESE SE SSE S

SSW SW WSW W

WNW NW NNW None None None None None None None None None None None None 7.8 (4.9)

None None None None None 6.4 (4.0) 5.8 (3.6) 5.4 (3.4)

None None None None 5.5 (3.4) 6.9 (4.3) 7.1 (4.4) 6.5 (4.0) 5.5 (3.4) 5.9 (3.7) 6.8 (4.2)

None None None None None None None Nonee None None None None None None None None 85