IR 05000491/1979001
| ML19270F571 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Cherokee  |
| Issue date: | 01/16/1979 |
| From: | Herdt A, Rausch J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19270F564 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-491-79-01, 50-491-79-1, 50-492-79-01, 50-492-79-1, 50-493-79-01, 50-493-79-1, NUDOCS 7902150453 | |
| Download: ML19270F571 (4) | |
Text
.
pn st%
UNITED STATES
,#
o,,
NUCLEAR RELULATORY COMMISSION
o R EGloN ll
'
$
101 M ARIETTA STREET, N.W.
ATLANTA. GEORGI A 30303 o,s,...../
Report Nos.: 50-491/79-01, 50-492/79-01 and 50-493/79-01 Licensee:
Duke Power Company P. O. Box 2178 422 South Church Street Charlotte, North Carolina 28242 Facility Name:
Cherokee iclear Station Docket Nos..
50-491,50-492 and 50-493 License Nos.: CPPR-167, CPPR-168 and CPPR-169 Inspection at:
Cherokee County, South Carclina Duke Power Corporate Office, Charlotte, North Carolina Inspection condu ed: Ja
.ry 3-5, 1979
/~
~
Inspector p
,,,
J.
a'
ch/ rincipal Inspector Date Approved by:
/- /[-7f
'
A. E. Herdt, Section Chief, RCES Branch Date Summary Inspection on January 3-5, 1979 (Report Nos. 50-491/79-01, 50-492/79-01 and 50-493/79-01)
Areas Inspected:
Routine, unannounced inspection, site preparation, QA program implementation, site fire protection, construction procedures, site QA records, structural concrete, nuclear service water piping and pumping station.
The inspection involved 18 man-hours on-site by one hPC inspector.
Results:
No items of noncomplianct or deviations were identified.
.
7092150453
.
,
RII Rpt. Nos. 50-491/79-01, 50-492/79-01 and 50-493/79-01-1-DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted Duke Power Company (DPC)
W. Henry, QA Manager, Construction
- J. T. Moore, Project Manager, Construction
- C. B. Aycock, Project Engineer, Construction
- R. A. Morgan, Senior QA Engineer (Catawba)
- A. R. Hollins, Senior QC Engineer
- K. W. Schmidt, QA Engineer
- C. Arnold, QC Engineer
- Attended Exit Interview.
2.
Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings (Closed) Deficiency (491,492,493/78-08-01): Spillover of aggregates in stockpiles. The licensee's letter of December 20, 1978 advised the NRC that all corrective action is complete. Inspection Report Nos. 50-491/
492/493/78-10 confirmed that the stockpile overflow has been cleaned up and the stockpiles drawn down. The inspector confirmed this during this inspection. The aggregate ordering policy has been changed to prevent any future over-ordering.
In addition, Cherokee has committed to a program to monitor the stockpile levels to assure no overfilling takes place. The inspector has no further questions at this time.
3.
Unresolved Items There were no new unresolved items identified as a result of this inspection.
4.
Independent Inspection Effort The inspector toured various areas of Units 1, 2 and 3 to observe construction activities in progress. The inspector observed progress made and construction progress of the nuclear service water (NSW) dam, pump structure, and concrete placement for reactor building Unit 1 and the auxiliary building.
The inspector also observed the in process mapping of the Unit 2 reactor cavity.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were noted in the areas examined.
.
.-
.
RII Rpt. Nos. 50-491/79-01, 50-492/79-01 and 50-493/79-01-2-5.
QA Personnel The inspector was advised that Mr. Ron Barnes has been replaced, effective January 1,1979, by Mr. Wayne Henry as QA Manager Construction. Mr. Wayne Henry was formerly the Catawba Design Coordinator.
The inspector met with Mr. Henry in Charlotte on January 5,1979 'td discuss the Quality Assurance Program and organization.
Mr. Ken Schmidt continues to act as the Project Senior QA Engineer, reporting to the Senior QA Engineer at Catawba, who in turn reports to the QA Manager, Construction, in the Charlotte corporate office. Duke Power does not plan to establish a Project Senior QA Engineer at Cherokee until the project warrants a larger QA staff.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
6.
Dam Construction All dam construction has been halted and the dam secured for the winter.
The filter has been installed at a level which will permit drainage without detriment to those portions of the dam already built.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified 7.
Quality Assurance Manual and Procedure Review Selected sections and procedures of the licensee's QA manuals associated with design engineering, procurement, and construction were reviewed +o determine whether the QA plans and procedures have been upda*cd to correct previously identified programmatic deficiencies.
.e inspector noted that this had been accomplished and that licer. ace self-initiated changes for the purpose of increasing effectiveness had also been made.
The inspector reviewed the following procedures in detail:
A-1 Rev. No. 6
" Preparation and issue of Quality Assurance Procedures"
.
D-1 Rev. No. 6
" Control of Field Design" E-3 Rev. No. 12
" Field Procurement of Materials and Construction
.
Services" The inspector observed that procedure E-3 makes reference to Part 21 requirements through a note on page 1.
The note states that, " Require-ments for field procurement of non-code, nuclear safety-related items and construction services are as stated in Section E-3 of the QA Manual
.g.-
.
RII Rpt. Nos. 50-491/79-01, 50-492/79-01 and 50-493/79-01-3-for ASME Code Work.
The inspector noted that paragraph E-3.4.1,
"
.
" Preparation of Purchase Requisitions" includes a listing of nine items required by the Quality Assurance Program. One of the items states that all requisitions for safety-related items shall contain the following in the body of the requisitien: "The provisions of Title 10 code of Federal Regulations, Part 21 apply to this purchase. The signer of this purchase order shall be notified if this regulation is involved".
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
8.
Exit Interview The inspector met with licensee representatives denoted in paragraph 1 at the conclusion of the site inspection on January 5, 1978.
The inspector summarized the purpose and scope of the inspection and the findings. The licensee was advised that no noncompliances were found and that the deficiency item on aggregate stockpile overflow is closed.
.