IR 05000445/1982002
| ML20050D786 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Comanche Peak  |
| Issue date: | 03/19/1982 |
| From: | Kelley D, Westerman T NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20050D740 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-445-82-02, 50-445-82-2, NUDOCS 8204120391 | |
| Download: ML20050D786 (7) | |
Text
{
l
..
.
-
..
APPENDIX U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION IV
Report No. 50-445/82-02 Docket No. 50-445 Category:
A2 Licensee:
Texas Utilities Generating Company 2001 Bryan Tower Dallas, Texas 75201 Facility Name:
Comanche Peak, Unit 1 Inspection At:
Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station Inspection Conducted:
January 1-February 28, 1982
--::- -
69 / 8 2-
' '
Inspector:
G!- D. L. Kelley, Senior Resident Reactor Inspector Date Approved:
Ya
"b 9 f 6L w
P)e 1. F. Westerman, Chief Date Reactor Project Section A Inspection Summary Inspection Conducted During the Period of January 1-February 28, 1982 (Report 50-445/82-02)
Areas Inspected:
Routine, announced inspection by the Senior Resident Reactor Inspector (Operations), including: (1) Quality Assurance for the Preoperational Test Program; (2) Preoperational Test Program; (3) Plant Tours; and (4) Preoperational Test Procedure Review.
The inspection involved 153 inspector-hours by one NRC inspector.
Results: Within the areas inspected, no violations or deviations were identified.
I
.
..
..
Details 1.
Persons Contacted
- B. R. Clements, Vice President, Nuclear
- J. C. Kuykendall, Manager, Nuclear Operations
- R. E. Camp, Lead Startup Engineer (EDS)
- D. E. Deviney, Operations QA Supervisor
- G. L. Kunkle, Startup QA Supervisor
- H. A. Lancaster, Startup QA Specialist
- R. A. Jones, Manager, Plant Operations R. B. Seidel, Operations Supervisor R. E. Kahler, Supervisor, Engineering and Administration A. Vega, Supervisor, Quality Assurance Services The SRRI also interviewed other applicant employees during the inspection period.
- Denotes those persons attending the final exit interview on February 28, 1982.
2.
Preoperational Test Program Quality Assurance The inspector reviewed the applicant's Quality Assurance Plan to ascertain the following:
a.
That the plan will provide controls over conduct of preoperational testing and related activities, b.
That the plan is consistent with FSAR commitments.
c.
That the plan has been implemented.
d.
That authorities and responsibilities have been established.
e.
That requirements for inspection frequencies, procedures, and check-lists have been established.
f.
That methods for identification of deficiencies and methods of corrective actions have been defined.
g.
That a system of audits has been defined.
h.
That the personnel involved in the QA program have received the required training.
The inspector concluded that the applicant's program generally meets the above requirements, but the plan and procedures showed discrepancies and/or weaknesses in the following areas:
a, e, and g, above.
These areas and the program were discussed with applicant representatives.
The NRC inspector was informed by the licensee that the program and
'
..
.
procedures are undergoing a complete revision.
It is the NRC inspector's understanding that the program and procedures when revised will fully address those areas where concerns were identified.
Until such time as the revision is complete and has been reviewed, this item will be considered unresolved.
(8202-01)
No violations or deviations were identified.
3.
Preoperational Test Program The inspector has reviewed the applicant's "Startup Administrative Procedures Manual" to verify the following:
a.
That personnel are familiar with the description and importance of the preoperational test program.
b.
That the program meets commitments of the FSAR and the conclusions of the Safety Evaluation Report.
c.
That test procedures are developed using the latest approved information.
d.
That methods exist to ensure that the latest revised supporting procedures, drawings, and system changes have been incorporated into the test package just prior to test performance.
e.
That provisions for deviation from test procedures have been implemented.
f.
That procedures for evaluation and approval of test results have been implemented.
The inspector reviewed Chapter 14 of the FSAR, " Initial Test Program,"
to determine the scope and commitments for the preoperational test program and the following implementing procedures:
Procedure Number Revision Title CP-SAP-1
Startup Administrative Procedures Manual CP-SAP-2
Startup Program Organization and Responsibilities CP-SAP-3
Custody Transfer of Station Components CP-SAP-4
Custody Transfer Tagging CP-SAP-5
Safety Tagging Procedure i
,. -
.
Procedure Number Revision Title CP-SAP-6
Control of Work on Station Components After Release from Construction to TUGC0 CP-SAP-7
Format and Content Requirements for Test Instructions / Procedures CP-SAP-8
Review, Approval and Revision of Test Instructions / Procedures CP-SAP-9
Electrical Test Record Drawing Control CP-SAP-10
Startup Program Quality Assurance / Quality Control CP-SAP-11
Review, Approval and Retention of Test Results CP-SAP-12
Deviations to Test Instructions / Procedures CP-SAP-13
Temporary System Modifications CP-SAP-14
Design Change Processing CP-SAP-15
Request and Documentation of Vendor Startup Assistance CP-SAP-16
Test Deficiency Processing CP-SAP-17
Review of Reactor Operating /Startup Experiences CP-SAP-18
Control of System / Component Problems CP-SAP-19
Personnel / Indoctrination Qualifications CP-SAP-20
Guidelines for System Walkdown Inspections It should be noted that CP-SAP-10, Revision 1, "Startup Program Quality Assurance / Quality Control," is being revised and will be reviewed in conjunction with the review and resolution of the unresolved item (8202-01) in paragraph 2 of this report.
No violations or deviations were identified in this area.
-- --
__
_
b
=
.,
.
4.
Plant Tours The inspector conducted several plant tours for familiarization and inspection of housekeeping activities.
No violations or deviations were identified.
5.
Preoperational Test Procedure Review The following preoperational tests were reviewed in draft form:
ICP-PT-58-1, " Residual Heat Removal System" 1CP-PT-48-1, " Containment Spray System" This review was made to determine if the following had been addressed:
a.
Management Review; b.
Format clearly defines testing to be performed; c.
Test objectives are clearly stated; d.
Prerequisites are identified; e.
Special conditions (if any) are specified; f.
Acceptance criteria are identified and requirements are specified for comparison of results with the acceptance criteria; g.
Source of acceptance criteria is identified; h.
Initial test conditions are specified; i.
Reference to appropriate FSAR sections, drawings, specifications, and codes are included; j.
Step by step instructions of sufficient detail are included to ensure that conduct of the test will result in valid conclusions; t
k.
Provisions for documenting that required steps have been performed and
!
space for recording data are included; 1.
Temporary circuit changes, installation of jumpers, and restoration after testing is properly documented; m.
Independent verification of critical steps or parameters is addressed.
No violations or deviations were identified during this review.
. - _ _
.
-
-
_-.
.
..
f
..,.
,
The NRC inspector will review selected _ approved procedures prior to the conduct of the preoperational tests.
6.
Unresolved Items
-
Unresolved items are matters about which more information is required in order to ascertain whether they are acceptable items, violations, or deviations.
One such item was disclosed during the inspection and is discussed in paragraph 2.
7.
Exit Interview The inspector held several exit interviews during the inspection period to apprise the applicant of the inspection findings.
A final exit interview to review the scope and findings of the inspection was held on February 26, 1982, with the licensee representatives identified in paragraph f
-
.
.
N'c FosM Me U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION pa'NC.P AL iN5PEC'Ca rNam a wr sciame nere Th K s.l ley, De n nb L.
INSPECTOR'S REPORT
,,,,,,,
Office of Inspection and Enforcement 7, p, g)g 3 % pr M n
""'""' D. L. k' zll m l
'
'
"
I l
'* ANSA DCN
,
,7 UCENSEE!vENoon NO gyenOoycT,13s,,,,
"
.
1 - 'NS EM a
- s fkr a pte p.
gg g plg
M3 M - WOOiFV j
g I
d
-
- 0ELETE
'
O I
,.
REPLACE
nGANLZATON COO nEGcNiMQ CONOUCT.
O,NG ACTNITY (See #fM PiROQ QF INvf 5 TaGA70Ne sN5PECTION
'45PECTION Pf aFOmME D e f socorf.
F#GM TO 1 BEGCNAL OFFICE STAFF lOTHER g a,,,,,y,,,C,OSM~Wa w g
g, p
~~*
K 2 mE5sOENTINSPECTOR 3EGiCN Wis.ON saANCM
Day l vn MO DA, va k
l hCh h
oj i ollM2.:0!& 2JB g!2 5 - "aFoaMANCE APMaisAL TEAu
,,
.% 'l
'
.% s
...
-..
s.
.
Tv*E CF ACnv'T v cGNouCTED #Checa one com o,wys MEG 60N AL AC?ON
'
' " ' * *
K 02 - SAFETY M - MGMT Vt5.T
Pt. ANT SEC.
14 -.NOutRY 1 - NRC FORM S91 03 INCIDENT 07 - SPECIAL 11 -.NVENT VER 15 - iNvt5TICATION 2 REGONAL OFFsCE LE*TER M - ENFORCEMENT N - VENDOR
'2 - SMIPUENT, EXPORT 06 - MGMT AyOff 09 - MAT ACCT
$3-.wpoof MkUnt.fu.aean. J a ;, he~.
s to ~ y
.g g.,.... "
l
'C T AL NuwSE A ENFORCEMENT CCNFERENCg aE*ca r CONT A N 1790 SETTER On #EPORT Te&NSM'TT AL o ATE
.
OF VCLATICNS ANO
> ELD
'NFC'* ATCN A
C D
OEvi4TcNS N#C FCRU 591
- EPORT SENT Om MEG TONG FOR Y
h 1 - CLE An LET'E81 :55VED ACTON 2 - vol.ATON C
D uO l 3Av lva l MO l OAv l VR l l4I8lCl0 l4l8 l4 l 9 l C D
3 - DEvtATON f,~1] h lf I l l l l a - VIOLATON 4 0EviATON lo.oi i
l l l l
VES l j
vE5 i
!
,
wOoutE NFOavATioN g
wOoutE.NFOauaTcN l
woDULE Nuweta sv5P yg g MODULE MG FOLLOWUP l wCoutf aEQ 80LLowup l.h M$
wOcultNuveta>NSP cg g 5!h5 ie r
g!hi 3e r
r r
!:rs i5:
s
!!
8s
_:rg5 i:
- !
8 s.
s.
1 5 8 s.
s.
- > s 3s
- 5"1535'a e
e
.
.
~
.
> r
-
s ' *:
-
'1 i'i f!"
!'-
>
>
-
- . c a
,-
353s5
-
-
.
.
.
--
o-.
=i,
!,!
!_
,! :
a 1!
-
-- 5 r
- i
-
,! !.
e e! :
,!,, f
c,!
2 3
<
v
.
m ae
.,
I a
v -
-
-
z
~1 v
.,
2 e e
-
liiibd A 7iolA oio l6 oM ilia IiiIl al 3Lol7ioJlc oioi l
'
'
,
.
i
,i i
I,,il li,ll
a
, i
, i
,
,,
,,
i li,Il I
li,Il
<
<
,
,,
i,
i
,,
,,
i,,il I
1,.ll
=
=
,
,,
,,
,
l
,,
,.
IiiIl 9 3 7,o!Lo i2Jul o,LI lI,IiiIL4 3 9,217,oi61
^
oisu l
, i
, i i
.
I,,Il I,liill
'
i,
, i i
,,
,,
li,il 1,,11 c
-
,,
,,
,
,,
,,
,
i,,Il I
!
I,,Il e
e
,.
,,
,
,,
,.
dinolaoa le I o,a i
! I I, I,, I lh 7, il10 alc o,so noiok I,,II
-
,,
i liill
'l I
!iliill
'
, i
,i i i i i i
d l
liliill Ii,ll i,
, i
,,
,,
i
=l Ill,1,,Il
- !
I,.Il
,,
..
,,
,,
,
.M3]M!Aoill
! Ioml!, ! !!!iliiIbli i
I d
Ii!
!
IiiII i
, i i i i
!
I,.!!!,1,,tl
!
!,,
I li,il
,,
,,
,
!,,
I li,Il I
Ill,I,,Il
-
i.
,
i i 1.
l
.
I I i ! I
~
l !
.! !. i
,l
,
,
i.
! I
! I
.. _,.
a ii.
,
.
A-s.a-i.A'n
'!
.I
.1 i
t h 3l4' M MME*G 1tht C T h*E'759[19lJDW N*'37 7 3DNt e t a nien'o W ha N 4 EJ i= MW+mantrail
)