IR 05000445/1982021
| ML20027E737 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Comanche Peak  |
| Issue date: | 10/15/1982 |
| From: | Kelley D, Westerman T NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20027E734 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-445-82-21, NUDOCS 8211150666 | |
| Download: ML20027E737 (6) | |
Text
o.
APPENDIX U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION IV
Report:
50-445/82-21
Docket:
50-445 Category: A2 i
Licensee: Texas Utilities Generating Company 2001 Bryan Tower Dallas, TX 75201 Facility Name:
Comanche Peak, Unit 1 Inspection At: Comanche Peak, Unit 1 Inspection Conducted: September 1-30, 1982 Inspector E
.
///L
/M/y/P7 D. L. Kelley7 5en Rr Res' dent Reactor Inspector Shte/
/d/IS-8 ~L -
Approved:
_/4 T. F. Westerman, Chief Eate '
Reactor Project Section A Inspection Sununary Inspection Conducted during the Period September 1-30, 1982 (NRC Report 50-445/82-21)
Areas Inspected: Routine, announced inspection by the Senior Resident ReactorInspector(Operations), including:
(1) Preoperational Test Procedure Review; (2) Plant Tour; (3) Changes to Applicant's Organization; and (4) Plant Status. The inspection involved 111 inspector-hours by one NRC inspector.
Resul ts: Within the areas inspected, no violations or deviations were identified.
.
...
~~
' 8211150666 821025
'
'
PDR ADOCK 05000445
,
G PDR i
!
....,..
...
-
-
. _ - _.. -.
.
,- -
.,..
DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted
- J. C. Kuykendall, Manager, Nuclear Operations
- J. T. Merritt, Startup Manager
- G. D. Smith, Lead Startup Engineer (EDS)
- H. A. Lancaster, Startup QA Specialist
- D. W. Braswell, Engineering Superintendent
- C. H. Welsh, Startup Turnover Surveillance Supervisor
- D. E. Deviney, Operation QA Supervisor R. B. Seidel, Operations Superintendent S. M. Franks, Preoperational Test Supervisor (EDS)
R. Moller, Westinghouse Site Manager
- Denotes those persons present during the exit interview.
2.
Preoperational Test Procedure Review The NRC inspector reviewed several draft preoperational test procedures.
Comments were made where appropriate.
The procedures will be reviewed in their final form after approval by the joint test group (JTG). When the preoperational tests are performed, a brief review will be conducted of the latest revision to note any changes that may affect the test resul ts.
The procedures are reviewed with specific emphasis on the following:
a.
Management review.
b.
Format clearly defines testing to be performed.
c.
Test objectives are clearly stated.
d.
Prerequisites are identified.
Special con itions (if any) are specified.
d e.
f.
Acceptance criteria are identified and requirements are specified for comparison of results with the acceptance criteria.
g.
Source of acceptance criterion is identified.
h.
Initial test conditions are specified.
i. Reference to appropriate Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR)
sections, drawings, specifications, and codes are included.
j
-
-
...
j.
Step-by-step instructions of sufficient detail are included to ensure that conduct of the test will result in valid conclusions.
k.
Provisions for documenting that required steps have been performed and space for recording data are included.
'
l.
Temporary circuit changes, installation of jumpers, and restoration of circuits after testing are properly documented, m.
Independent verification of critical steps or parameters is addressed.
During this reporting period, the following draft procedures were reviewed and commented on. The comments made were minor in nature and were in the area of clarification:
ICP-PT-10-2 Reactor Makeup Water ICP-PT-34-2 Steam Generator Safety and Relief Valve 1CP-PT-53-02 Computer Input and Data Printout Verification 1CP-PT-55-4 Pressurizer Relief Tank 1CP-PT-37-2 Condensate Storage and Transfer System XCP-PT-42-2 Spent Fuel Pool HX and Pump Room Fan Coolers 1CP-PT-32-01 Auxiliary Building HVAC No violations or deviations were identified during this interview.
3.
Plant Tours During this reporting period, the NRC inspector conducted several inspection tours of Unit 1.
In addition to the general housekeeping activities and general cleanliness of the facility, specific attention was given to areas where safety-related equipment is installed and where activities were in progress involving safety-related equipment.
These areas were inspected to insure that:
a.
Work in progress was being accomplished using approved procedures.
b.
Special precautions for protection of equipment was implemented where required and additional cleanliness requirements were being adhered to, where required, for maintenance, flushing, and welding activities.
c.
Installed safety-related equipment and components were being protected and maintained to prevent damage and deterioration.
Also during these tours, the NRC inspector reviewed the control room and shift supervisors log books.
Key items noted in the log review were:
a.
Plant status b.
Changes in plant status c.
Tests in progress d.
Documentation of problems which arise during operating shifts
,
,. -,. - _ - -..__ _ -.
-
,
, _,
,,, -
,
....
With the exception of consistency of format and detail, the operating logs accurately reflect the plant status and the evolutions being performed. The comment just mentioned has been reviewed with the applicant and has been taken under
,
advisement (open item 8221-01).
No violations or deviations were identified.
4.
Changes to Applicant's Organization During this reporting period, the applicant made a change to the startup organization. Mr. J. T. Merritt was named Texas Utilities Generating Company's (TUGCO) startup manager. Mr. Merritt was Texas Utilities Services, Incorporated (TUSI) engineering and construction manager. The applicant is presently reviewing the Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) to determine if an amendment will be required. The NRC inspector will follow progress of the applicant's review (open item 8221-02).
5.
Plant Status The following is a status of TUGC0 manning levels for operations and plant testing activities as of September 30, 1982.
a.
Operations Manning Status Authorized personnel level (including maintenance, operations, administration, quality assurance, and engineering) - 440 Number presently onboard - 318 b.
Plant Testing Status Total number of Preoperational Tests - 129 Number of Preoperational Tests thru draft - 77 Number of Preoperational Test approved (JTG) - 30 Total number cf acceptance tests - 40 Number of acceptance test thru draft - 25 Number of acceptance test approved - 11 Test completion status Prenperational Tests - 1 Acceptance Tests - 0 6.
Exit Interview An exit interview was conducted September 30, 1982, with applicant representatives (identified in Paragraph 1).
During this interview, the NRC inspector reviewed the scope and discussed the inspection findings.
_ __
_
_
_,
......
l NAC FORM 798 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION PRWCITAL INSPECTOR (Nems. est. arst. anetmumse nney li'#0s=
Kellsv
'D enair L.
I INSPECTOR'S REPORT
yy,,,,
,
g Office of inspection and Enforcement 7 p, ph-p;; cmw I
WanCTOss o.L.l(alley l
'
I UCENSEE/ VENDOR DOCKET NO. is ogm# 0R UCENSg l
REPORT NEXTINSPEC.DATE l TRAN N
NO. isV PROouCTma a,=1 l
=0.
l Sta uO.
YR.
l
~~TFv4-s (M.I.t[c s dro Ere# fin n 1 O #o o o 414L61Rl217_lfl
" ~ **'"'
l A
co mem i
_
II IIIIIc I
" - " " ' "
Ii li i i i a l
. V
_ o - otuTE
'
( L oel,e 4 4 ses a -nauCE o
CtH I
l----- l I
-
PERICO OF INVESTIGATIONtINSPECTION INSPECTION PUFORMED BY ORGANIZATION CODE OF REGION #MQ CONOUCT.
FWM
1 - REGIONAL OFFICE STAFF
]OTHER l
p MO.
DAY l YR.
MO.
DAY YR.
v'2 - RESIDENT INSPECTOR I
'IEGOs DiVtSON f
BR ANO*
I 0,1 ol/ $ 1 0 1&{1 3 PERFORMANCE APPRA& SAL TEAM
,
i REGCNAL ACTION TYPE OF ACTIVITY CONOUCTED tCheca one com orsys l P02 - SAMTY 08 - MGMT. VISIT
_
10 - PLANT SEC.
14 - INQUIRY
"
_
_
_
1 - NRC FORM 681 03 - INCIDENT
_
07 - SPECIAL 1, - INVENT.VER.
_
15 - LNVESTIGATION s.-'2 - KEGIONAL OFFICE LETTER 04 = ENFORCEMENT 08 - VENDOR
_
12 - SHIPMENT / EXPORT
~
~
06 - MGMT. AUDsf 09 - MAT. ACCT.
13-IMPORT
..n w.......... a a....w. r a w.* *
'C*n nae now w
{l TOTAL NUMBER ENFORCEMENT CONFERENCg REPORT CONTAW 2330 / h LETTER OR REPORTTRANSMITTALDATE l
CP VIOLATIONS AND MELD WFORMATCN A
B C
CEVIAMONS
NRC FORM 591 REPORT SENT V
1 - CUAR ORREG.
TOMaFOR LETTER ISSUED ACTTON 2 - VIOLATION 3 - CEVIATION lA 8 l C l0 lAl8ICl0 l4 0lCl0l l MO. l OAY l YR. l MO.
DAY l YR. l 4 - vtOLAT10N 4 DEVIATION o * C)
i l
l fl l h I"
II f
l I ~ YII f]f1Y i9
_!G W f. l l ii
f MODULE INFORMATiON ll MODULE INFORM A MON ll N
MODULE NUMGER WSP.
dg g MODULE AEaFOLLOWuP lM MODULE NUMBER INSP, 3g MODULE REC FOLLOWUP l E
Eh E
E E
$6 O
E
$5 s
=
!
!!
c:dB
!!
!!
!
=ggo!
=o!s!!
!:SG 355 s! i !
$2
!
i 3 g5355 w!:5 3
.
=
=
.
i a
E s 3 g5355 sas
.
i sa E s l E g
m
sa
!
E s
i lo
!!
!
<
i
.a ro E
=o
-=
=
-
E
-=
E
.. a-o
-
.
-
, -
=
- =
m
-
.
- =
.
e # J ]g[f 7,6g,{ fC 00,3 I i, I ls l,,ll I
^
^
,,
,
,
I ll l
,
l,
,,
,
I,,11 I,,il
a
,,
,,
,
,,
,,
,
li,Il liill c
c
,,
,,
,
,,
,,
,
i,,il il e
i,,
=
,,
,,
,
,,
,,
,
l,ilk l,il l,,Il dJ 7iolJio,olB o,2i 3
,,
,
^
^'
e
,
i
,,
i i i
I,ill I,,il
'
a
,,
,,
,
,,
,,
,
cl 1,,Il 1,,il c
,,
,,
,
,,
,,
,
t.,il i,,il e
,,
,,
,
,,
,,
,
@ 7, olaio,IlT5 I,, I l.
I,,I l,,iI.
^
o,4,o
^
.
,,
,
,
,
,,
,,
,
liill Ii,Il
'
a v i
, i i
i i
,,
i I,,ll i,,il c
c i i
,,
,
,,
,,
,
l.,il i,
i lr o
o
,,
,,
.
,,
,,
,
,
43 0iz.17,oi6l
^l O ili f
,i i l,, I l.
!,,i
,
,
i,
,,
i l,
ll
^
=
,
I,,Il I.,il
'
a
,,
,,
,
,,
,,
,
li,Il 1,,11 c
c
,,
,,
,
,,
,,
,
i,,ll
=aarevi.T.ON e
,
,
,, i l e
,,
,,
,
muea E
E E 1Etun e!!tme i
.-
..
j
- KMAM M A DOCKET sec.18 OR N REPORT MODULENUMOEA
- f.g;> pfg.jg$$<
pj komus me. TOY 03 %
Yk EkI1h No.
850.
l l l l l l INSPECTOR'S REPORT
^
""* ""*" o" 'Y!p*.,%
(Continuation)
,
a
.
.
.
ac Office of Inspection and Enforcement
] [s o[
c
- -
,
-
VIOLAT108e OA Ofv1ATIO8e @eser te eJe88 -
- er same nom. # me een smosome me masseer, a se as c
, e gemenroom uma ahes e 80 canressere sawu 1.
L L
4.
L
&
7.
S.
9.
10.
11.
1L
14. '
14 17.
19.
20.
21.
22.
24.
l
3
M.
I 23.
!
t n
.
31.
32.
.
G
si U.S. NUCLEAR REG ULATORY COMMISSION