IR 05000445/1982008
| ML20054L232 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Comanche Peak  |
| Issue date: | 06/21/1982 |
| From: | Kelley D, Westerman T NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20054L229 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-445-82-08, 50-445-82-8, NUDOCS 8207070291 | |
| Download: ML20054L232 (3) | |
Text
.
.
.
l I
APPENDIX U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION IV
i
Report No:
50-445/82-08 i
Docket No:
50-445 Category: A2 Licensee: Texas Utilities Generating Company 2001 Bryan Tower i
Dallas, TX 75201 Facility Name: Comanche Peak, Unit 1 Inspection At:
Comanche Peak, Unit 1
'
'
'
Inspection Conducted: May 1-31,1982 Inspector:
, [//
.
/
Da'te wu M; / #/l( 2 -
D. L. Kelley,"$'enior' Resident Reactor Inspector
Approved:
7 [ //
M T/j MrL T. F, Westerman, Chief, Reactor Project Section A /
Dat'e
'
Inspection Summary
Inspection Conducted During the Period May 1-31,1982 (NRC Report 50-445/82-08)
Areas Inspected:
Routine, announced inspection by the Senior Resident Reactor
Inspector (Operations), including:
(1) Plant Tours; and (2) Preoperational
,
Test Procedure Review.
The inspection involved 72 inspector-hours by one NRC
'
,
j inspector.
!
Results: Within the areas inspected, no violations or deviations were identi fied.
!
t I
!
,
,
'
i
}
l 8207070291 820628 PDR ADOCK 05000445 j
Q PDR
.-. -
-. -. - -.... - - _.
- -. -
.
.
.-
- -. -
-- -.-
,-..-, -.-..--,- -,----
-.
-
l
,
'
[
.
.
i i
!
,l i
,
i
!
DETAILS
'
!
t
'
l.
Persens Contacted
'
- J. C. Kuykendall, Manager, Nuclear Operations
,
l
- R. A. Jones, Manager, Plant Operations
- G. D. Smith, Lead Startup Engineer (EDS)
- G. L. Kunkle, Startup Quality Assurance Supervisor
"
- D. E. Deviney, Operations Quality Assurance Supervisor
R. B. Seidle, Operations Supervisor
'
"
- T. L. Gosdin, TUGCO, Public Information The SRRI also interviewed other applicant's employees during the inspection period.
'
- Denotes those persons present during the exit interview.
2.
Preoperational Test Procedure Review i
The following preoperational tests were reviewed in draft form:
ICP-PT-55-1 Reactor Coolant System Cold Hydro
!
ICP-PT-29-2 DG Control Circuit Functional and Start Test 1 CP-PT-29-3 DG Load Test
,
ICP-PT-29-4 DG Sequence Operational Stability Test i
1CP-PT-57-1 SI Pump Performance Test ICP-PT-57-5 SI Accumulator Blowdown This review was made to determine if the following had been addressed:
,
a.
Management Review.
!
I b.
Format clearly define: testing to be performed.
c.
Test objectives are clearly stated.
d.
Prerequisites are identified.
[
e.
Special conditions (if any) are specified.
,
f.
Acceptance criteria are identified and requirements are specified
-
for comparison of results with the acceptance criteria.
L
,
l
[
I
-
i
!
!
l l
i I
i
..,--vr.-,..y
,..,ry
.,---,-.%
m..-.-
,..-. -,,., -. -..
--,m
-
-..._r, m-
,--.w_.v,.-,vy--.--w,.--,y mm.e....p..ye,,-.,..y---.,.,,--,.w,.,,.w.%-
---m-c-.,-,
.
..
.
g.
Source of acceptance criterion is identified h.
Initial test conditions are specified.
i.
Reference to appropriate FSAR sections, drawings, specifications, and codes are included.
J.
Step-by-step instructions of sufficient detail are included to ensure that conduct of the test will result in valid conclusions.
k.
Provisions for documenting that required steps have been performed and space for recording data are included.
1.
Temporary circuit changes, installation of jumpers, and restoration of circuits after testing are properly documented.
m.
Independent verification of critical steps or parameters is addressed.
No violations or deviations were identified during this review.
3.
Plant Tours Several plant tours were conducted.
During these tours the inspector observed the following:
a.
The general housekeeping activities.
b.
Special precautions and cleanliness requirements in effect for maintenance, flushing, and welding.
c.
Installed safety-related equipment and components were protected to prevent damage and deterioration.
No violations or deviations were identified.
4.
Exit Interview An exit interview was conducted on May 28, 1982, with applicant representatives (identified in paragraph 1).
During the interview, the inspector reviewed the scope and discussed the inspection findings.