IR 05000445/1982008

IE Insp Rept 50-445/82-08 on 820501-31.No Noncompliance Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Plant Tours & Preoperational Test Procedure Review

ML20054L232
Person / Time
Site:	Comanche Peak
Issue date:	06/21/1982
From:	Kelley D, Westerman T NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:
Shared Package
ML20054L229	List: IR 05000445/1982008 ML20054L228
References
50-445-82-08, 50-445-82-8, NUDOCS 8207070291
Download: ML20054L232 (3)

Text

.

. .

l I

APPENDIX U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION IV

i

Report No: 50-445/82-08 i

Docket No: 50-445 Category: A2 Licensee: Texas Utilities Generating Company 2001 Bryan Tower i Dallas, TX 75201 Facility Name: Comanche Peak, Unit 1

' Inspection At: Comanche Peak, Unit 1

' '

Inspection Conducted: May 1-31,1982 Inspector: 7 , [// .

wu M; / #/l( 2 -

D. L. Kelley,"$'enior' Resident Reactor Inspector / Da'te

Approved: 7 [ // M T/j MrL T. F, Westerman, Chief, Reactor Project Section A / Dat'e

'

Inspection Summary

Inspection Conducted During the Period May 1-31,1982 (NRC Report 50-445/82-08)

Areas Inspected: Routine, announced inspection by the Senior Resident Reactor

, Inspector (Operations), including: (1) Plant Tours; and (2) Preoperational

'

Test Procedure Review. The inspection involved 72 inspector-hours by one NRC ,

j inspecto !

Results: Within the areas inspected, no violations or deviations were

! identi fie t I  !

,

,

'  ;

i

}

l 8207070291 820628 PDR ADOCK 05000445 j Q PDR

.-. - - . - . - - . . . . - - _ . - - . - . .

.- - - . - -- - .- ,-..- , - .-..--,- -,----

- . -

,

l

'

.

[ .

i i

!

,l i 2 ,

i

!  ;

'

DETAILS

! t

' Persens Contacted

• J. C. Kuykendall, Manager, Nuclear Operations

'

,

l *R. A. Jones, Manager, Plant Operations

• G. D. Smith, Lead Startup Engineer (EDS)

"

• G. L. Kunkle, Startup Quality Assurance Supervisor

• D. E. Deviney, Operations Quality Assurance Supervisor  :

"

R. B. Seidle, Operations Supervisor '

• T. L. Gosdin, TUGCO, Public Information The SRRI also interviewed other applicant's employees during the inspection perio '

• Denotes those persons present during the exit intervie . Preoperational Test Procedure Review i

The following preoperational tests were reviewed in draft form:

ICP-PT-55-1 Reactor Coolant System Cold Hydro  !

ICP-PT-29-2 DG Control Circuit Functional and Start Test

, 1 CP-PT-29- 3 DG Load Test ICP-PT-29-4 DG Sequence Operational Stability Test i 1CP-PT-57-1 SI Pump Performance Test ICP-PT-57-5 SI Accumulator Blowdown This review was made to determine if the following had been addressed: ,

3 Management Revie !

I Format clearly define: testing to be performe Test objectives are clearly state Prerequisites are identifie [

, Special conditions (if any) are specifie Acceptance criteria are identified and requirements are specified -

,

for comparison of results with the acceptance criteri L l [

I-

i

!  !

l i

l I

i

..,--vr.-,..y , . . ,ry .,---,-.% m..-.- ,..- . -,, . , - . - . . --,m -

-..._r, m- ,--.w_.v,.-,vy--.--w,.--,y mm.e....p..ye,,-.,..y---.,.,,--,.w,.,,.w.%- ---m- c-.,-,

.

. . .

3 Source of acceptance criterion is identified Initial test conditions are specifie Reference to appropriate FSAR sections, drawings, specifications, and codes are include Step-by-step instructions of sufficient detail are included to ensure that conduct of the test will result in valid conclusion Provisions for documenting that required steps have been performed and space for recording data are include . Temporary circuit changes, installation of jumpers, and restoration of circuits after testing are properly documente Independent verification of critical steps or parameters is addresse No violations or deviations were identified during this revie . Plant Tours Several plant tours were conducte During these tours the inspector observed the following: The general housekeeping activitie Special precautions and cleanliness requirements in effect for maintenance, flushing, and weldin Installed safety-related equipment and components were protected to prevent damage and deterioratio No violations or deviations were identifie . Exit Interview An exit interview was conducted on May 28, 1982, with applicant representatives (identified in paragraph 1). During the interview, the inspector reviewed the scope and discussed the inspection findings.