IR 05000438/1982019
| ML20062J165 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Bellefonte  |
| Issue date: | 07/23/1982 |
| From: | Quick D, Wilcox J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20062J133 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-438-82-19, 50-439-82-19, NUDOCS 8208160282 | |
| Download: ML20062J165 (9) | |
Text
,
, , gm Rfo o UNITED STAYES MUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISslON
[f
\
[og es
$
REGIOR 11 101 MARIETTA STREET # # ATLANTA, GEORGI A 30303
\...../
- Report Nos. 50-438/82-19 and 50-439/82-19 Licensee
- Tennessee Valley Authority 500A Chestnut Street Chattanooga, TN 37401 l Facility Name: Bellefonte ,
Docket Nos. 50-438 and 50-439 License Nos. CPPR-122 and CPPR-123 Inspection a Bel efonte site near Scottsboro, Alabama Inspector .~ 7/EJ/8t_ [
J. D. W' x , J ' '
Date Signed l
Approved by: M 7 L-D./R. Muick, X ofion~ Chief D'ivision of 7 ~ Ddte SMned Project and Reactor Pro rams SUMMARY Inspection on June 1-30, 1982 Areas Inspected This routine, announced inspection involved 133 inspector-hours on site in the areas of construction surveillance, Quality Control Investigation Report (QCIR)
l review, QA audit review, licensee identified items (Unit 1 & 2), Nonconformance l Condition Report (NCR) review, welding performance qualification record review, licensee action on previous inspection findings, work release review, clarifi-cation of previous reports, drawing control, environmental site visit, hanger '
inspection, and power production calibration of equipmen Results Of the 13 areas inspected, no violations or deviations were identified.
,
i
!
.g--,
8208160282 820723 PDR ADOCK 05000438 G PDR
- . - . . ., - . =_ _ - - _ - .
.
.
DETAILS Persons Contacted Licensee Employees i
- Dahnke, Project Manager
- F. Gilbert, Construction Engineer G. Blackburn, General Construction Superintendent D. Freeman, Electrical Engineer Supervisor EEU
- T. Brothers, Hanger Engineer Supervisor
- *F. Moses, Mechanical Engineer Supervisor H. Johnson, Welding Engineer Supervisor WEU
'
- D. Smith, Assistant Construction Engineer
- J. T. Walker, Assistant Construction Engineer F. Huffman, Assistant Construction Engineer !
- J. Barnes, QA Unit Supervisor
- D. Bridges, Assistant Construction Engineer
- ~ L. McCollum, Instrument Engineer Supervisor J. Olyniec, Civil Engineer Supervisor
- B. J. Thomas, Assistant Construction Engineer
- W. F. Chapley, IEU G. Greer, QA Unit -
- K. Lawless, WEU E. Rose, QA Unit l
- A. Richards, EEU QC Supervisor t
- Gillies, Hanger Engineering Unit ;
K. Frazier, Staff Engineer
<
T. F. Newton, STW Supervisor ;
- P. C. Mann, Engineer Management Assistant i
- B. Sammons, Administrative Officer i
- Q. Franklin, Assistant General Construction Superintendent i
- P. McGraw, EEU
- J. McCutchen, IEU QC Supervisor 7
- D. Whitehead, TVA NUC PR
~
E i Other licensee employees contacted incluried 8 construction craftsmen, 6 technicians,1 mechanic, 4 security force members, and 12 office personne !
t
- Attended exit interview [ Exit Interview *
,
The inspection scope and findings were summarized on July 6, 1982 with those ,
persons indicated in paragraph 1 abov '
'
i Licensee Actions on Previous Inspection Findings
'
- (Closed) Unresolved item 438,439/81-33-09
- " Control of Advance [
! Drawings" - Site TVA generated QCIR #15518 to investigate this problem
! and to determine if it was a generic issue (per QCRU, B. Fisher). The ;
i
._ .
- * .
1
'
only master drawings which had this problem were the ones identified by the NRC residen No further action is required on the item and it is '
close . Unresolved items
Unresolved items are matters about which more information is required to determine whether they are acceptable or may involve violations or ;
deviations. New unresolved items identified during this inspection are discussed in paragraphs 12, 14 and 1 . Independent Inspection Effort - Construction Surveillance !
The inspector spent most of his time in direct surveillance of hardware in the field which included the following areas: :
(Unit 1 Reactor Building) Witnessed portions of erecting steel in annulus ;
area; installing decay heat removal, chemical addition and boron recovering, '
a
'
component cooling water, spent fuel cooling, makeup and purification and .
waste disposal piping; installing steam generator bumpers and snubber
'
plates; installing main steam and feedwater piping whip restraints; installing exposed conduit and associated supports; installing local instrument panels in the instrument room; pulling and terminating cables; tensioning upper steam generator supports; installing reactor coolant drains and vents; installing CRDM's on reactor pressure vessel head; installing !
auxiliary fuel handling bridge crane; installing rebar, shoring and forming for secondary dome; and installing miscellaneous 0-ring plate :
.
'
(Unit 2 Reactor Building) Witnessed portions of installation of the reactor large core flooding, decay heat removal, reactor building spray, waste disposal, auxiliary feedwater, makeup and purification, main steam, feed-water, component cooling water, and spent fuel cooling piping; installing steam generator snubber plates and bumpers; installing electrical penetra-tions; installing HVAC ductwork and associated hangers, cable trays and
- supports, and exposed conduit and supports; and installing spray line ,
supports; and installing reactor coolant drains and vent ,
(Auxiliary Building) Witnessed portions of installing chemical addition and boron recovery, component cooling, feedwater, main steam, auxiliary steam, auxiliary feedwater, make up and purification, spent fuel handling and reactor building spray piping; installing spent fuel cooling and decay heat removal hangers, piping and valves; installing pipe supports in Units 1 and 2 main steam valve room A; pulling and terminating cables, installing radiation monitors; erecting fuel storage bridge in spent fuel pool; '
applying protection coating on Unit 1 ELEV 590; and working on catwalks and i concrete pours.
.
(General) Witnessed portions of installing fire protectio i
-
. -. , - ---- - - - - - , . - - - - - - - - - . . - - - - - - - - - - - . .. ..
. _ . _ _ _ . . _ _ . _ _ _ _ . __ . . _ ._
. .
,
p 3 i
, Quality Control Investigation Report (QCIR) Review The resident inspector . reviewed tha description and recommended disposition i
,
of the following QCIR's: L l QCIR N Date Title 20035 5/4/82 Craft foreman signed work release "okay ,
i to begin work" before prework hold points .
i were release l
-,
,
'
20615 5/18/82 Test 2?, end of cables had wrong . i size lugs on all conductor ,
>
> 20806 5/22/82 Test 24, end of cable had I unacceptable amount of wire stripped on l white-white conducto '
The above QCIR's were noted as being examples of repeat conditions of I
- similar problems noted during the inspection review period. It appears that r j a trend may exist in these area *
i i These QCIR's were handled in accordance with Bellefonte's Quality Control ;
i Procedure, BNP-QCP-10.26, Rev. ,
! i
'
No violations or deviations were identified.
j Nonconforming Condition Report (NCR) Review
- t
'
The resident inspector reviewed the item description, noncompliance e
description, recommended disposition and action required to prevent i recurrence for the following NCR's:
- t
'
NCR N Date Title
.
'
1857 6/14/82 Depression in pipe surface caused by seismic lug removal ,
1859 6/15/82 Flow meter nozzle - 3/4" SCH 160 1858 6/14/82 One ARC strike on valve body
1860 6/18/82 Built-in indicators 1861 6/17/82 No torque values given I
These NCR's were handled in accordance with Bellefonte's Quality control
,
Procedure, BNP-QCP-10.4, Rev. 8.
il No violations or deviations were identifie t t
i i
!
I i
__ __ . . , , . _ _ . _ . . _ . . - _ - - - . _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ - _ .
_ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ . , _ _ , . . - . . _ . _ . _ . . . _ _ _ . _
.. . . . ~ . . _ .- . __ _ -
. ,
.
- Work Release Review
, The resident inspector reviewed the type of work, description, engineering i unit approval, and QA records affected for the following work releases (WR):
'
.
WR N Date Title r
34330 6/22/82 Determinate cables and pull out ,
F.
- 34293 6/21/82 Core drill one (1) hole to remove wedge bolt j i
34322 6/22/82 Grind loose surface mounted plate 34239 6/17/82 Drill 8 holes for installation of 8 wedge bolts 34321 6/22/82 Disconnect tubing compression fittings [
These work releases were handled in accordance with Bellefonte's Quality Control Procedure, BNP-QCP-10.6, Rev. 1 No violations or deviations were identifie .- Licensee Identified Items (LII)
'
'
The resident inspector reviewed the status of the following LII's with site and ENDES personnel. The following licensee identified items have been reported to RII by TVA unless otherwise specified: ,
> (0 pen) CDR 438/82-35; 439/82-32 " Operational Defect in HPI Nozzles and r l Thermal Sleeves" (BLN NEB 8206) (0 pen)CDR 438/82-36; 439/82-33 " Nonconforming Material Used by KWM in
'
DHR System Valve" (BLN NEB 8204) (0 pen)CDR 438/82-37 " Failure of BIF Butterfly Valve Seats" (NCR 1819) ' (0 pen) CDR 438/82-38; 439/82-34 " Installation of Wrong Resistor by Consolidation Controls, Corp." (BLN EEB 8204) i r
.
10. Quality Audit Review '
The resident inspector reviewed the following Quality Assurance Audits for accuracy and completeness: l
] Audit N Title No. of Deficiencies J
r BN-E-82-04 Electrical and Instrumentation 1 ;
Storage and Maintenance i i
,
. -
_ . , _ - - - . . . . _ . _ . - . _ _ . . . _ _ _ - - __ -~ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ - -
.
.
BN-C-82-03 CEO Surveillance on INRYC0 1 Tendon installation No violations or deviations were identifie . Welding Performance Qualification Record The resident inspector reviewed the following welding performance qualifi-cation records for completeness:
Stamp N Welding Procedure N Test N Date Pack GT-43.43-0-1A Rev. O GT-43-0-1-L(a) 6/17/82 FBKJ SM-18-B-1 Rev. 5 SM-5-B-3-H 6.17.82 These welding performance qualification records were handled in accordance with Bellefonte's Quality Control Procedure, BNP-QCP-10.24, Rev. No violations or deviations were identifie . On June 1, 1982, the resident inspector found several drawing sticks in the fuel handling building which included Quality drawings that were controlled and out of date. Site QCRU was notified of the inspector's findings. The drawing number, foreman in charge, drawing stick and craft type were as follows:
4AWO848-X2-Series K. Tanner Ironworker 850-X2-Series K. Tanner Ironworker 852-X2-Series K. Tanner Ironworker 854-X2-Series K. Tanner Ironworker 856-X2-Series K. Tanner Ironworker 858-X2-Series K. Tanner Ironworker 859-X2-Series K. Tanner Ironworker 4AWO860-X2-Series K. Tanner Ironworker 861-X2-Series K. Tanner Ironworker 862-X2-Series K. Tanner Ironworker 863-X2-Series K. Tanner Ironworker 864-X2-Series K. Tanner Ironworker
.. ..
865-X2-Series K. Tanner Ironworker 866-X2-Series K. Tanner Ironworker 867-X2-Series K. Tanner Ironworker
,-
868-X2-Series K. Tanner Ironworker 869-X2-Series K. Tanner Ironworker ;
870-X2-Series K. Tanner Ironworker l
871-X2-Series K. Tanner Ironworker l 872-X2-Series K. Tanner Ironworker k 874-X2-Series K. Tanner Ironworker
'
876-X2-Series K. Tanner Ironworker
878-X2-Series K. Tanner Ironworker ,
t 879-X2-Series K. Tanner' Ironworker 880-X2-Series K. Tanner Ironworker In addition, one drawing stick of the concrete progress chart was also ;
identified. The above noted drawings (not including the concrete progress charts) were identified as controlled drawings not located on TVA Memo from W. G. Pickens to F. E. Gilbert /G. K. Blackburn dated March 2, 193 Approximately 40 type written pages of controlled drawings have been reported as lost since June 2, 1981. The majority of these drawings have been either lost by the craft or never issued to the craf CFR 50
! Appendix B Criteria VI states:
!
l VI. Document Control l " Measures shall be established to control the issuance of documents, such as l instructions, procedures, and drawings, including changes thereto, which
! prescribe all activities affecting quality. "
l~
It should also be noted that numerous controlled drawings have been located and destroyed by QCRU but are still on the status of controlled drawings not located. The above is identified as Unresolved Item 438,439/82-19-01
_
" Controlled Drawings not Located."
13. Environmental Site Visit The resident inspector attended portions of the NRC/TVA environmental site
- visit conducted on June 15, 1982. This visit included participation by NRC, State and TVA personnel. In addition, the resident inspector reviewed the
-
i
r
. . .
request for additional information included in NRC letter to H. G. Parris from E. G. Adenson dated June 8, 1982 (Docket Nos. 50-438/439).
14. Hanger Inspection During the week of June 14, 1982, the resident inspector performed a detailed inspection of two (2) seismic supports on the Decay Heat Removal System. The two hangers inspected were IND-MPHG-0048 Rev. 2 and IND-MPHG-0049 Rev. 3. Hanger #1ND-MPHG-0048 Rev. 2 was identified as having the following deficient condition: ITT Grinneli Sketch No. IND-MPHG-0048 Re sheet 1 of I shows the embedment plate (P 936) as a standard flat surface embedment plate. However, the as-built condition, as shown on TVA drawings 4RW0517-X2-04 Rev. 7, 4RW0518-X2-10 Rev. A, and 4RWO518-X2-12 Rev. 7, includes four (4) 1 3/4" dianeter rods threaded 5" on each end penetration 4" through the embedment plate (P936). Hanger IND-MPHG-0048 Rev. 2 was installed with its i" x 4" x 4" structural tubing over the exposed rod thus preventing the installation of a nut and washer as required by TVA drawing No. 4RWO518-X2-12 Rev. This hanger was completed and signed off by Q The above condition is identified as unresolved item 50-438/82-19-03 " Hanger Embedment Plate."
15. Clarification of Previous Reports Report 438,439/82-13 In paragraph 8 (page 13) change (closed) title from Inspector Followup Item (IFI) 438,439/80-08-06 to Licensee Identified Item (LII) 438, 439/80-08-06 In the second part of paragraph 8 (page 13) change the wording from " numbered MEB 8007" and "NCR BLN MEB 8007" to " numbered MEB 80-07" and "NCR BLN MEB 80-07", respectivel . Power Production Calibration of Equipment During portions of Unit 1 make up and purification system flush through pump INV-MPMP-002, the resident inspector observed four Power Production personnel calibrating a temporary pressure switch. During this calibration effort two potentially deficient conditions were identified. The cali-bration equipment used was not being maintained in a clean condition based on the level of cleanliness required for the system in which the calibration was being performed (i.e. level A, B, clean) and a lack of knowledge was noted on the remaking of a compression fitting after calibration. Power production personnel could not correctly answer the question; when remaking a compression fitting, af ter calibration, how tight do you retighten the fitting? Two answers were given and both were incorrect (1st answer - 11 turn after hand tight, 2nd answer - i turn after hand tight). The correct answer is specified in the Parker Henninfin catalo r
. . o
Additional investigation of Power Production revealed the following: no procedures exist which specify maintaining cleanliness controls on calibra-tion equipment. The above is identified as Unresolved Item 438,439/82-19-02, " Power Production Calibration of Equipment."
,
l
!
l l
l