IR 05000438/1982013
| ML20054M960 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Bellefonte  |
| Issue date: | 06/18/1982 |
| From: | Debbage A, Mcfarland C, Upright C, Wright R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20054M957 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-438-82-13, 50-439-82-13, NUDOCS 8207150194 | |
| Download: ML20054M960 (14) | |
Text
i
)
. ,
gaarco, UNITED STATES g' %,
g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION 11 g W 101 MA RIETT A ST.. N.W.. SUIT E 3100 o #
ATL ANT A, GEORGI A 30303 s .... /
Report Nos. 50-438/82-13 and 50-439/82-13 Licensee: Tennessee Valley Authority 500A Chestnut Street Tower II Chattanooga, TN 37401 Facility Name: Bellefonte Docket Nos. 50-438 and 50-439 License Nos. CPPR-122 and CPPR-123 Inspection at Bellefonte site near Scottsboro, Alabama Inspectors: k=wb k R. W. Wright '
/
(pbfo//Z-Dat'e Signed b SW w)*
__A. u'. Debba V /
///4h2-Dat6 SicJned b b- (d~ 6//4 f/2-
C. Rf McF la / Dat'e S1'gned Approved ):
C. M. Upright, Section Chief Date Signed
- Engineering Inspection Branch Division of Engineering and Technical Programs SUMMARY
!
j Inspection on May 10-14, 1982 i
f Areas Inspected
This routine, unannounced inspection involved 99 inspector-hours on site in the
'
areas of QA inspection of mechanical / piping work performance; QA inspection of electrical / instrumentation work performance; site procurement, receiving,
! storage, and maintenance; and licensee identified reportable items.
!
- Results
!
!
Of the four areas inspected, no violations or deviations were identified.
i
,
8207150194 820621 PDR ADOCK 05000438 G PDR i
_ _ _ _ . _ . __ -
_ _ - . _ _ - _ _ .-_._ _ _ _ _ _ - - - _ __ _ . _ - - _ _
, .
! I i
r
i r i REPORT DETAILS
-
i J Persons Contacted i Licensee Employees
! * R. Dahnke, Project Manager, Construction
- *F. E. Gilbert, Construction Engineer i * Smith, Assistant Construction Engineer (Mechanical)
- J. T. Walker, Assistant Construction Engineer (Civil)
- F. J. Huffman, Assistant Construction Engineer (Electrical)
'
- R. Brown, Project Manager, Office of Engineering Design and
! Construction (OEDC)
- R. E. Young, Assistant to OEDC Project Manager
- R. McNutt, Jr. , Assistant to OEDC Project Manager i *F. L. Moses, Supervisor, Mechanical Engineering Unit (MEU)
- *B. A. Fisher, Supervisor, Quality Control Records Unit (QCRU)
! *J. T. Barnes, Supervisor, QA
!
- T. M. Brothers, Supervisor, Hanger Engineering Unit (HEU)
- J. Cromer, Supervisor, Office and Civil Engineering Unit (0&CEU)
- *W. L. McCollum, Supervisor, Instrumentation Engineering Unit (IEU)
j J. H. McCutchon, Acting Supervisor, IEU - QC
- *P. G. McGraw, Assistant Supervisor, Electrical Engineering Unit (EEU)
- A. L. Richards, Assistant Supervisor, EEU-QC
- K. Lawless, Acting Assistant Welding Engineer Supervisor, Welding Engineering Unit (WEU)
W. S. Kelso, Associate Engineer Reactor Group, MEU
S. C. Amaker, QC Inspector, MEU-QC D. L. Metcalf, QC Inspector, MEU-QC C. H. Burnsworth, Associate Engineer, MEU J. T. Wright, Supervisor, Warehouse Services Unit (WSU)
J. Olyniec, Supervisor, O&CEV Other licensee employees contacted included numerous construction craftsmen,
-
several technicians, QA/QC personnel, engineers, and CEO office personnel.
!
NRC Resident Inspector i
- J . D. Wi l cox , Jr.
i
- Attended exit interview ,
, Exit Interview I
, The inspection scope and findings were summarized on May 14, 1982, with 1 those persons indicated in paragraph 1 above.
! Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings i
Not inspected.
I
. , . , _ , . , . - ,. __ y - , . . . , _ - - - - . . - , ~
--- - . . -_ ._ _
-- - . _ _ .. - .
. ,
2 l Unresolved Items
.
'
Unresolved items were not identified during this inspection.
- Procurement, Receiving, and Storage (35065B) Procedures Reviewed
!
Program requirements and procedures governing procurement, receiving, and storage control activities were reviewed for completeness and i
effectiveness. The documents reviewed included the following:
'
BNP-QCP-1.1, R7, Add 2 Receiving Inspection '
BNP-QCP-1.2, R9, Addl Storage BNP-QCP-1.3, R2, Add 3 Maintenance
BNP-QCP-5.14,R1 Storage of Concrete Materials
'
BNP-QCP-8.1, R4, Addl Preparation and Review of Field Procurement Documents BNP-QCP-10.9, R9 Material Identification and Marking
, BNP-QCP-10.12, R7 Material Issue Control BNP-QCP-10.22 R1, Addl Transfer of Items BNP-QCP-10.26,R4 Quality Control Investigation Report (QCIR)
BNP-QCP-10.27, R5, Addl Housekeeping BNP-0CP-10.31, R2 Evaluation and Selection of Suppliers 4 CONST-QAP-4.1, R7 Procurement Document Control j CONST-QAP-7.1, R0 Transfer of Items for Construction Use
- CONST-QAP-7.3, R4 Evaluation and Selection of Suppliers Within this area, no violations or deviations were identifie ' Storage of Equipment and Materials
'
The warehouse and laydown areas were inspected to verify that the equipment remaining in storage was retained in the correct level of storage environment. Equipment examined in storage level A warehouses
, HK and HL included radiation scanning instrumentation, radiation moni-
! toring equipment, reactor vessel sealing ring, and nonconforming j electrical cable Equipment examined in storage level B warehouses i
HH, H0, HR, HT, and WC included dry cleaning units, post accident sampling system, motorized valves, and radiation shielding. Material
'
and equipment examined in storage level C warehouses SF, SB, SA, SM,
'
and sheds 0 and K included tornado damper operators, reactor in-core instrumentation tubing, seismic hangers, mechanical shock arrestors, elevator equipment, and electrical cable. Other areas inspected were platform A stainless steel fittings, the structural steel laydown area, and the .nain warehous I (
i f
_ , _ . _
- - . _ , _ . . , , , , . . _ _ _ , _ . _ . _ _ . _ _ _ _ - . _ _ . , _ _ _ . . - _ _ . _ . - _ _ _ ._ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . , _ _ . . - . _
d 4A u -e 4*.-4e:__ m 4 a - m $_: _h. . . _ ~ . . - - e-.
j . .
I
!
l 3 j A licensee QC inspection of material delivered by truck was in progress i at this time and witnessed by the inspector. Structural steel A36
specification had been transferred from the Hartsville Nuclear Project by request for shipment #78715 Some reinforcing steel bar on. the same truck was destined for the Browns Ferry Nuclear Plan Within this area, no violations or deviations were identifie Procurement and Receiving Inspection Organization The supervisor of the Office and Civil Engineering Unit (OCEU) is responsible for site procurement of safety related items and con-struction materials and for receiving inspection activities. The
- current work load involves processing approximately 160 field purchase
- orders and purchase requisitions monthly and inspecting truck deliv-eries which varied from 5 to 10 deliveries daily. Staffing support for this work were 8 persons for procurement and 9 inspectors. All purchase orders and requisitions were processed through the Warehouse j Services Unit; approximately 330 contracts were processed monthly by
! this uni Design Engineering Quality Assurance Branch provides an j approved supplier index for use by site personnel involved in procure-ment and procurement document review. The index being used was current and dated March 31, 1982.
,
, Purchase requisitions and resulting contracts were examined to ensure
! that the technical and quality assurance requirements were specified j and that the recommended supplier was on'the approved supplier inde Purchase requisitions reviewed were numbered 787020, 787024, 787160,
! 787177, 787145, 787020 and 787024. In all cases the quality level for the purchase was specified, technical certification was required when applicable, and 10 CFR Part 21 requirements were included when neces-
!
'
sary. All requisitions had been adequately reviewed and approved in accordance with established procedures. Several field purchase orders were also examined and these were found satisfactor Purchase requisition #787221 dated March 18, 1982, was for a replace-
!
ment part on Unit 2 polar crane. It was designated safety related
.
quality level 3 but this was not indicated on the resulting contract j 82KNS-78722 It was found that QCIR 20,116 dated May 7, 1982,
- addressed similar problems; also that a memo dated May 12, 1982, had i been sent by the Project Manager to the procurement branches requesting l inclusion of safety classification and quality level on the contracts.
i Although no classification was on contract 82KN5-787221, the items had
been inspected by QC personnel and recorded on RIC 209-82-277 It l would appear, therefore, that controls exist to ensure QC inspection
and adequate storage of materials and records even though quality i level / safety designation was not incorporated in the contract. This
, will be inspector follow-up item 438,439/82-13-02, Quality Levels In
'
Contract Within this area, no violations or deviations were identified.
,
l
- -- - -_ - . - - - . . .. _ . - - - - - -
- . -. - .__ . .- _ _ . - -. _ -. -
- . .
1
i Preventive Maintenance
'
During a walk-through of the auxiliary building, three items were selected for verification of the maintenance inspection activity. One was the component coolant pump 2KC-MPMP-002-B and the others were
-
instrument support units 2IX-ILPA-123-A and 2IX-ILP-173. The QCRU records were obtained and reviewed for these items and the inspections j had been performed as require ;
! Within this area, no violation or deviations were identified, Quality Assurance Unit Audits
, Several audits had been performed by the u te QA unit covering receiv-i ing, storage, and maintenance activities. The following recent audit reports were examined as well as the schedule for current and future activitie These audits were reviewed to verify the licensee's
,
compliance with the accepted QA program.
) -
Audit E-82-04, Electrical Instrumentation Storage and Maintenance, commenced on April 23, 1982, and was still in progress at the time i of this inspection.
j -
Audit BN-M-82-02, Receiving Inspection of Mechanical Equipment, j was performed February 2 - March 2, 1982. The scope was to
observe receiving inspection activities to verify compliance with
! QA/QC procedures and to review receipt inspection records and
!
documentation package No deficiencies were observed by the
, auditor Audit BN-G-82-01, Field Procurement and Transfer of Items, was performed February 8 - March 31,1982. The scope was to review procurement documents filed in the Quality Control Records Unit and to review documents maintained by the QA Unit. The following
_
'
,
'
three deficiencies were found during the licensee audit:
1 Dow Corning DC 200 lubricant procured as a non-safety related item but was to be used during installation of control rod drive mechanisms.
l A copper constantan thermocouple procured as a non-safety l related item was a replacement part on the makeup purifi-cation system.
[
A replacement shaft had been received without the required documentation and a QCIR had not been prepared.
l
-
Audit BN-E-81-19, Receiving Inspection - Electrical /Instrumenta- ,
I tion, was performed December 10, 1981 - February 2,198 The '
scope included the review of QA records and QA program require-ments. Three deficiencies were noted, one of which required a minor revision to the implementing procedure , _ - . _ . _ , _ _ . _ _ _ , . . , _ _ _.__ _ _ , . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _
___ - __ _ _ _ . _ __ _ _ _ _ - ._ _ . _ _ _ - . .
,
. .
!
.
-
Audit BN-M-81-07, Storage, Issue and Identification of Mechanical Items, was performed August 3-21, 1981. The audit team examined the assigned storage level, the maintenance of storage environ-
'
ment, compliance with storage practices, and the general condition
, of mechanical equipment. Two deficiencies were noted, one of
,
which identified shed roof leakages on stored equipment.
1
-
Audit BN-M-81-06, Maintenance of Mechanical Equipment, was made
! July 20 - August 7, 1981. No deficiencies were identified during the audi The qualifications of the lead auditors were examined; they were all
, experienced individuals and fully qualified to conduct these audits.
(
Within this area, no violations or deviations were identifie . QA Inspection of Mechanical / Piping Activity Performance (35061B)
- This inspection was performed to determine whether site work is being
'
accomplished in accordance with NRC requirements and SAR commitments that the QA/0C program is functioning in a manner to assure that requirements and commitments are met, and that prompt and effective action is taken to
'
achieve permanent corrective action on significant discrepancie For Unit l's Control Rod Drive Mechanism (CRDM) installation activities and for Unit 2's Decay Heat Removal System (DHRS) activities, the following areas were examined to verify the inspection objective Field Drawings, Specifications, and Work Procedures CRDM Activities i
) B&W Control Rod Drive System Instruction Manual, B&W Document No. 01
042104 R4 (Diamond Power Control No 506183, Rev 3)
BNP Sequence Control No. INR-M-004 R1 - NR Control Rod Drive Mechanism Drive Installation B&W Procedure Review Number 124 of TVA SCC titled, Reactor Coolant System CRDM Installation (SL-695-FCP, NSS-15)
BNP-QCP-6.3, R3, Mechanical Equipment BNP-QCP-6.11, R0, Addendum 2, Clean Operations
! BMP-QCP-10.11, R8, Addendum 2, Calibration of Measuring and Test Equipment i
l BNP-QCP-10.36, R0, Addendum 2, Sequence Control Charts
,
!
!
l l
, . - . . _ - . - - - , . - - , - - . _ . . _ . - . - - - -.-
- __ _ . _ . . - _ _ _ _ . . - _ __ _ . , _ - _ - - . _. . . _ - _ _ _ _ . .
. .
ANSI N45.28 - 1975, Supplementary QA Requirements for Installation, Inspection and Testing of Mechanical Equipment and Systems for the Construction Phase of Nuclear Power Plants DHRS Activities j CONST - QAPP-10, RI. Inspection CONST - Specification G-29M NCM - Section 4.2, R8, Automated Process Control NCM - Section 5.1, R15, Welding Control NCM - Section 6.1, R15, Nondestructive Examination Control BNP - QCP - 7.9, R9, Addendum 2 Fitup & Cleanliness i BNP - QCP - 10.4, RS, Addendum 3, Nonconformance Condition Reports BNP - QCP - 10.26, R4, QC Investigative Reports BNP - QCP - 7.5, R6, Addendum 2, Visual Examination of Weld Joints
! BNP - QCP - 7.1, R2, Addendum 2, Radiography Examination DWG - No 3BWO612-ND-01, R8, Design Criteria Diagram, Decay Heat
,
'
Removal System DWG - Nos 3AWO412-ND-01 thru 10, Mechanical Decay Heat Removal System DWG - WM 2ND-4, R1, Auxiliary Bldg Unit 2 Master Weld Map, Decay i
Heat Removal System The inspector randomly selected the above listed field design drawings and procedures to ascertain whether the most recent revisions of i
drawings are used to perform work and whether the most recent revisions of construction specifications and work procedures are in agreement
- with the SA Field Inspection CRDM Activities The inspector observed assembly of CRDMs SN1223 and 1224 and verified that installation of CRDMs SN1286 and SN1223 was done in accordance with SCC # INR-M-004, R The handling of CRDMs prior to and during
! installation, clean room observations, and documentation concerning
'
the above mention CRDMs were examine The inspector's discussions with various craftsmen and observations of their work performance during the subject CRDM activities indicated that the crafts level of knowledge pertaining to their work tasks was adequate to provide the required quality of worksmanshi DHRS Activities The inspector selected a segment of Unit 2's partially completed Train A DHRS comprised of a NAVC0 prefabricated stainless steel pipe subassembly 2ND-83 and a 10"-300lb Borg Warner stainless steel motor i
. , _ . _ . _ _ _ . - . _ _ , _ _ _ . . . . _ _ . , . - - . . _ . _ _ , _ _ . , _ ,. __ __ __._ ___.___ _ . _ . _ . __ _
- _ _ - - ____ __ - __
.
operated gate valve S/N 26245. The inspector made a detailed inspec-tion of the completed work and a record review to determine that this segment of the DHRS was fabricated, installed, and inspected in accord-ance with approved drawings, specifications, and procedure c. Field Engineering and Quality Control
The inspector reviewed the following inspection records associated with
'
the following mechanical / piping activities observed to determine their adequacy, whether deficiencies submitted received proper attention and corrective action, and if work and work controls were adequate:
CRDM Activities
-
SCC INR-M-004 R1 - Initial Motor Tube Installatin Check Off Lists for CRMDs S/Ns 1286,1223 and 122 INC-025 - Attach A - Clean Operation Record
- Attach B - Clean Room Requirements DHRS Activities
-
Receiving Inspection Checklists for 10"-300 lb SS Gate Valve, S/N26245, TVA MK 3AWO412-ND-5; Prefabricated SS Pipe Subassembly 2ND-83
-
Certification Mill Test Reports for above
-
TVA QC Checklists & Shipping Release for above
-
Non-Destructive Examination Reports
-
Fitup & Cleanliness, Visual Examinationm and Radiographic Examination Status Cards for field welds Nos. 00148 & 00149 S1
-
Certification of Conformance for above The inspector reviewed the applicable QA/QC procedures (paragraph 6.a)
to determine that the frequency, timing, and acceptance criteria for the inspections were adequat The number of QC inspectors (two) provided for the coverage of the CRDM activity was satisfactory. Discussions conducted with the inspectors and field engineer determined that their knowledge of CRDM assembly /
installation activities was adequate and they conveyed the feeling that management was committed to a quality progra _ _ _ - _ - _ - - _ _ _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
. .
d. Nonconforming Items Reports The inspector reviewed selected reports of mechanical construction discrepancies concerning CRDM and mechanical / piping activities to verify as applicable that:
(1) the action taken corrected the items (2) the items were considered for reportability to the NRC (3) the instituted effective action prevented recurrence (4) the licensee has an adequate program to detect trends in discrep-ancies The following were reviewed: NCR 1662; and QCIRs 10800, 18451, 19025, 19139, 19325, 18541, and 1879 e. Materials and Equipmant OHRS Activities The reports of inspections (listed in paragraph 6.c DHRS) made by the licensee / vendor of materials used for the work in progress were exam-ined to verify that the material met design and purchase order require-ment C_RDM Activities The inspector examined the below listed CRDM testing and measuring equipment being employed during this work activity for current cali-bration stickers and applicable test records to support the calibra-tion:
ITEM PERIOD OF CALIBRATION Torgometer ID MEU-356 3/23 - 9/23/82 Torque Wrench ID EEU-414 3/5 - 9/05/82 Torque Wrench ID EEU-430 1/4 - 7/04/82 Vernier Caliper ID IEU-VC-1 4/27 - 10/27/82 f. Audits The inspector reviewed the following audits which had been performed on various phases of mechanical / piping construction activities:
BN-M-81-05, Fabrication / Examination / Installation - ASME Code Piping BN-M-81-06, Maintenance of Mechanical Equipment BN-M-82-02, Receiving Inspection of Mechanical Equipment BN-M-82-03, Installation of Control Rod Drive Mechanism / Clean Room Control
. .
The above audits were examined to determine if they were meaningful, effective, reflect quality performance, and whether corrective actions taken as a result of audit findings were proper, timely, and complet Within the above areas of mechanical / piping inspection activities, no violations or deviations were identifie . QA Inspection of Electrical Work Performance (35061)
The inspector reviewed field drawings and work procedures relative to safety related cable pulling and instrument wiring changes in Units 1 and 2. This inspection was conducted to determine that the site work is being performed in accordance with NRC requirements and SAR commitments that the QA/QC program is functioning in a manner to assure requirements and commitments are met and that prompt and effective action is taken to achieve permanent corrective action or significant discrepancie Field Work Procedures and Documentation The following documentation was examined to verify the inspection objectives versus the commitments made in FSAR Section 3.11 and 8.3.1.4.1:
TVA General Construction Specification G-38, R2, Installing Insullted Cables Rated Up to 15,000 Volts Inclusive QAPP-10, Inspection OAPP-11, Test Control 0AP 18.1, Audits 0CP 3.3, RS, Cable Tray QCP 3.4, R3, Add.1, Electric Cables and Jumpers QCP 3.9, R4, Electrical and Instrumentation Panel Boards and Equipment OCP 3.11, R2 (CTP 3.11), Switch Adjustment OCP 3.12, R1 (CTP 3.12). Motor Rotation and Performance OCP 3.13, R4, Equipment Installation OCP '.18. Insulation Resistance QCP 3.27, Indefinite Status Control During Trouble Shooting, Inspection and Test QCP 3.28, Computer Data Control QCP 10.10, R2, Add.1. Disposition and Documentation of Engineering Change Notices and Field Change Notices / Requests EEU-SOP 21, R1, Add.1, Internal Wiring Verification The inspector reviewed the above documentation and utilized observa-tions of completed work and discussions conducted with craf t and QC personnel to determine if the latest revisions of these documents were being employed and are in agreement with the SAR and to determine if
_
. ,
these documents adequately describe critical points and methods of application as well as inspection and test holdpoints to properly reflect design inten b. Field Inspection Field observations and discussions with electrical and instrumentation crafts and QC personnel were conducted relative to the following work items:
(1) Work in progress on Chiller Fan Motors 48 and 49 at elevation 590 in the Contro! Building and the related controls in the Control Room were observed. QCP/CTP 3.12 was the controlling procedure to correct a problem related to high amperage during the initial tests. The requirements of QCP3.12 have been incorporated into CTP 3.12 (a Construction Test Procedure)
(2) The Condensate Dimineralizer System Control Local Panel 01X-1LPT-108 at elevation 629 in the common area was observe The panel location shown on drawing STWO941-YM.01R3 had to be changed to Revision 4 to show the as is condition per QCIR 15140. The anchor bolt spacing had been changed for panel IIX-1LPR-012 per QCIR 1884 (3) The Reactor Building Spray Makeup and Purification and Decay Heat Removal System Local Panel ILPA-034 and the Liquid Waste Disposal System Local Panel ILPA-035 were observed at elevation 590 in the Auxiliary Building. QC checklist 58 of QCP 3.9 requirements was used by a QC inspector to inspect recent wiring changes between the panels and the associated junction boxe (4) The inspector observed work in progress on pulling class 1E cable for a hoist motor used to service a filte As indicated on drawing SGW 2741-MM-02 and pull card 2MM-ECA4-22 the cable was to connect panel 2ED-EMCC-48C3 on elevation 669 of the Auxiliary Building with a junction box 2MM-EMDT-018 on elevation 610. The inspector observed work on about 300 feet of the 374 foot pull.
l The work was not completed during the inspection perio c. Quality Control (QC) Reports The inspector reviewed the following Field Change Packages (FCP or FC)
,
and discussed the FCPs with knowledgeable EEU and/or IEU systems engi-
! neers and/or QC inspectors. The reasonableness and adequacy of the corrective actions and the documentation were evaluated relative to appropriate drawings and procedures (see paragraph 7.a). The engineers' and inspectors' comments indicated that the work was under control and was adequat (1) FC20/20A Modification to Vital Power to ESFA Two 70 Amp Breakers were installed, one 150 Amp Breaker was delete . .
(2) FC110 Decay Heat and Makeup Pump Motor Thermocouples. A thermo-couple that was damaged due to overheating was replace (3) FC130 Fuel Handling Equipment Modifications. Modifications were needed for proper indexing the recently acquired Westinghouse close-spaced fuel storage rack (4) FC133 Reactor Protection System, Subsystem D Modificatio Wiring discrepancies in the reactor trip as built circuiting required drawing change (5) FCl41 Protection Auxiliary Cabinet Wiring. Wiring discrepancies in the intermediate range channel NI-4 required additional wirin d. Nonconforming Item Reports The inspector reviewed Revision 2 Addendum 1 of QCP 10.10, Disposi-tion and Documentation of Engineering Change Notices and Field Change Notices, and discussed the subject of reporting construction discrep-ancies with the EEU, IEU, and QAU engineers, inspectors, auditors and supervisors, and the QCRU supervisor. Reports of construction discrep-ancies and discrepancies of purchased items identified on site are reported as QC Inspection Reports (OCIR) which initiate Nonconformance Reports (NCR) (see paragraph 8), Engineering Change Notices (ECN),
Field Change Notices (FCN), Field Change Packages ( FCP) , and work request TVA design and licensing groups initiate CDRs which also result in ECNs, FCNs, FCPs, and work requests. A monthly Master Status Report is issued per QCP 10.10 by the site Startup Testing and Coordina-tion Unit (STCU) and routinely distributed to the engineering, inspec-tion, and craft supervisors. Closure of the discrepancies is recom-mended by the site to design (ENDES) af ter corrective action is taken and verified by QC and Q The reporting system appears to be adequate. The timeliness of the corrective action is the subject of an inspector followup item in paragraph e. Audits The inspector reviewed the Audit Deficiency Status Reports dated January 20, 1982, and April 21, 1982, and selected the audits listed below for 1981 and 1982 activities to review. The inspector discussed the audits with the auditors, reviewed original documentation, and discussed the ef fectiveness of the program with the auditors and the 0A Unit supervisor. Particular attention was devoted to the auditing of electrical and instrumentation work and the auditing of ECNs and FCPs (reference paragraph 7.d above).
(1) BN-G-81-02 Drawing Control (included FCP distribution and control)
(2) BN-G-81-03 Disposition and Documentation of ECNs and FCPs
,
. .
>
(3) BN-G-81-12 Document Control (4) BN-E-81-18 Electrical and Instrumentation Equipment Installa-tion (5) BN-E-82-01 Electrical / Instrumentation Panels, Boards and Equipment (6) BN-E-82-02 Insulation Resistance (7) BN-E-82-03 Computer Data Control (in the areas of cable installation and termination, jumper installation, local control and test panel fabrication, and name tags)
(8) BN-G-82-06 Disposition and Documentation of ECNs and FCPs The inspector's review indicates that the audits are meaningful, effective, and retlect quality performance. Corrective actions taken to date appear to be complete. The status reports indicates completion dates that are cur-ent except for the disposition and documentation of ECNs and FCP Audit BN-G-81-03, conducted the first quarter of 1981, identified as a deficiency that personnel were not reviewing and updating the ECN and FCP status report within the time frame required by BNP-QCP-10.10, R2, Addenda Audit EN-6-82-06, conducted the first quarter of 1982, ioentified as a def 4 ciency that the review time required by BNP-0CP-10.10 had been rela <ed from one week to two weeks. The failure to
) review these outstarding items appears to indicate a failure to devote manpower to the corrective action deemed necessary. The potential need for the corrective action to consider the basic cause of the deficiency and the potential generic application of the corrective action to the balance of the related work at Bellefonte and/or within other TVA offices caused the inspector to stress the need for timely reporting of the status of the audit finding. A simple deletion of the require-ment for a timely resiew of the status report as discussed at the exit meeting will indicate a failure of corporate management to be committed to the QA program. The OA Unit audit has advised management of the need for timely corrective action in audits 81-03 and 82-06. The apparent failure to require and assure timely resolution is not consistent with the balance of the QA program at TVA and at Bellefont Until deficiencies identified in audi ts BN-G-81-03 and 82-06 are corrected this is ider tified as an inspector followupitem (438,439/82-13-01).
Within this area, no violations or deviations were identified.
l I
.. .
I 13 l 8. Licensee Identified Reportable Items (Closed) Inspector Followup Item (IFI) 438,439/80-08-06, TVA MEB 80-01 ITT Controls of American Warning and Ventilating (AWV) Dampers. The inspector reviewed the licensee's final report to Region Il dated May 15, 1981, dis-cussed the subject and the corrective action with a responsible Mechanical Engineering Unit (MEU) systems engineer, and observed the completed wor Nonconformance Report (NCR) BLN MEB 8001 Revision 1 documents the problem, the corrective action, the assignable cause, and the action required to prevent recurrenc The actuator springs for the specific dampers were measured in the field and adjusted to the specified length required to produce suf ficient power to actuate the damper in the event of a tornado, or in the event of an emergency shutdown. The design and field work has been verified by QA personrel and documented on NCR BLN MEB 8001 Revision This NCR was originally numbered MEB 8007 and the inspector verified that NCR BLN MEB 8007 has been reassigned to another problem that is not related to the AWV dampers.