IR 05000424/1985041
| ML20135G069 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Vogtle  |
| Issue date: | 09/06/1985 |
| From: | Belisle G, Julian C NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20135G068 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-424-85-41, NUDOCS 8509180110 | |
| Download: ML20135G069 (5) | |
Text
'
.
[k2 KErg#'o UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[
~ ',
- REGION 11
'g j
101 MARIETTA STREET,N.W.
- r ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30323 t
/
g.
.....
Report No.: 50-424/85-41 Licensee: Georgia Power Company P. O. Box 4545
' Atlanta, GA 30302 Docket No.:
50-424 License No.: CPPR-108 Facility Name: Vogtle 1 Inspection Conducted: August 12-15, 1985 Inspector:
r-
[ !W G. A. Belisle DJ Date Signed Accompanying Personnel:
R.
Latta, Region II
'
'
Approved by:
'
C. A. Julian, Se6tjon Chief Date Signed Division of Reactor Safety SUMMARY Scope: This routine, unannounced inspection entailed 54 inspector-hours on the site in the areas of Initial Test Program (ITP) Module 3A Readiness Review.
Results: No violations or deviations were identified.
% 24 PDR
l i
L
r
.
REPORT DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted Licensee Employees
- B. Barrett, Quality Assurance (QA) Specialist
- C. Belflower, QA Site Manager (Operations)
- R. Bellamy, Initial Test Manager S. Bradley, Readiness Review Team Leader, Modules 2 and 7
- J. Draggs, Readiness Review, QA Engineer J. Grey, Readiness Review Team Leader, Module 3A
- E. Groover, QA Site Manager (Construction)
- M. Hairston, Regulatory Compliance Associate Engineer
- C. Miller, Superintendent of Plant Engineering and Services
- W. Nicklin, Regulatory Compliance Supervisor M. Sheibani, Plant Engineer W. Smith, Plant Engineer
- G. Trudeau, Readiness Review Department Manager
- H. Walker, Operations Discipline Manager Other licensee employees contacted included construction craftsmen, engineers, technicians, and office personnel.
NRC Resident Inspectors
- R. J. Schepens
.
- Attended exit interview 2.
Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on August 15, 1985, with those persons indicated in paragraph I above. The inspector described the areas inspected and discussed in detail the inspection findings.
No dissenting comments were received from the licensee.
Inspector Followup Item - Verify QA Review of Module 3A Findings, paragraph 4.
The licensee did not identify as proprietary any of the materials provided to or reviewed by the inspectors during this inspection.
3.
Licensee Action on Previous Enforcement Matters This subject was not addressed in the inspection, i
L
r
.e
4.
Initial Test Program (ITP) Module 3A Readiness Reviec a.
Paragraph 3.5, Implementation Matrix The inspectors selected various commitments from Module 3A to verify that procedures clearly delineated requirements referenced.
The following commitments and references were selected for review:
Title or Description Section Reference ANSI N18.7-1976
FSAR 17.1 and 17.2 ANSI N18.7-1976 3.2 SUM-3, Revision 2
,
l ANSI N18.7-1976 3.3 SUM-24, Revision 1 ANSI N18.7-1976 3.4.2 SUM-24, Revision 1 ANSI N18.7-1976 5.2.1 SUM-3, Revision 2
,
ANSI N18.7-1976 5.2.11 SUM-18, Revision 3 ANSI N18.7-1976 5.2.12 SUM-13, Revision 5
!
ANSI N18.7-1976 5.2.14 SUM-18, Revision 3
SUM-23, Revision 1 i
ANSI N18.7-1976 5.2.15 SUM-2, Revision 4 SUM-11, Revision 2 SUM-13, Revision 5 SUM-15, Revision 3 i
i SUM-20, Revision 2 l
ANSI N18.7-1976 5.3 SUM-2, Revision 4 i
SUM-11, Revision 2
,
SUM-13, Revision 5 SUM-15, Revision 3 SUM-20, Revision 2 ANSI N45.2.1-1973 1.3 SUM-1, Revision 1 ANSI N45.2.1-1973 2.2 SUM-12C, Revision 0 SUM-15, Revision 3
SUM-16, Revision 3 ANSI N45.2.3-1973 2.4 00254-C, Revision 3 ANSI N45.2.3-1973 3.1 00254-C, Revision 3 ANSI N45.2.3-1973 3.2 00254-C, Revision 3 ANSI N45.2.3-1973 3.2.1 00254-C, Revision 3 ANSI N45.2.3-1973 4.0 00100-C, Revision 1 i
ANSI N45.2.4-1973 2.5 00208-C, Revision 0 ANSI N45.2.4-1973 2.6 SUM-9, Revision 2 SUM-18, Revision 3 ANSI N45.2.6-1978 1.3 SUM-24, Revision 1
i ANSI N45.2.6-1978 2.1.2 SUM-24, Revision 1 ANSI N45.2.6-1978 2.2 SUM-24, Revision 1
.
ANSI N45.2.6-1978 2.3 SUM-24, Revision 1 i
i ANSI N45.2.6-1978 2.4 SUM-24, Revision 1 ANSI N45.2.6-1978 2.5 SUM-24, Revision 1 ANSI N45.2.6-1978
SUM-24, Revision 1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r-
..
,
Regulatory Guide 1.28 Regulatory Position Endorses ANSI N45.2-1977 With Clarifications
'
Regulatory Guide 1.58 Regulatory Position Endorses ANSI N45.6-1978 With Given Clarifications The inspector concluded that the referenced documents met existing regulatory requirements.
Within this area, no violations or deviations were identified.
b.
Section 5.0, Audits and Special Investigations The inspectors reviewed this section and verified that an audit schedule had been prepared for 1984, 1985, and 1986.
The inspectors reviewed seven audits conducted to date.
The following are the specific audits reviewed:
Audit Title Conducted Issued TP01-84/02 Nuclear Operations 09/17/84 11/08/84 Administrative Controls TP01-84/04 QA Assessment and Compliance 12/3-14/84 01/14/85 Audit of System Turnover and Initial Test Program Activities TP01-84/01 System NK01 Turnover 05/02/84 05/15/84 TP01-85/01 Training Activities in 01/15-28/85 02/26/85 Support of Initial Test Program TP01/TP02/
VEGP System Flushing and 03/11-21/85 04/16/85 TP03/TP05-Cleanliness Verification 85/02 Program TP02-85/04 Mechanical Documentation 03/21-28/85 04/08/85 Training TP01/02 System / Component Turnover 06/4-27/85 07/18/85 85/05 and Nuclear Operations Maintenance Practices During this audit review, the inspector verified that an approved audit checklist was used, that audits were issued as procedurally required, and that corrective action was planned or had been completed for audit findings.
l
r
- -
,.
Within this area, one inspector followup item was identified.
Module 3A, Section 6.2, contains a list of findings, responses, and corrective actions identified by the readiness review team during the ITP preoperational test phase verification.
Corrective action for-these findings was in process or had been completed. The findings were being tracked by operational QA personnel. An audit had been scheduled to verify corrective action adequacy and completion but, as of this date, the audit had not been started.
Until operations QA have conducted this audit and verified corrective action completion for the readiness review team findings, this is identified as inspector followup item 424/85-41-01.
c.
Section 6.0, Initial Test Program Preoperational Test Phase Verification The inspector reviewed the established verification process. Personnel directly involved in the process were interviewed. Additionally, the verification checklists used for confirming the stated commitments and listed procedures were reviewed for completeness. -The following were the specific licensee verification checklist packages reviewed:
Package Title 1 of 5 Readiness Review of Procedures, Imple-mentation Verification Documentation, Module 3A 2 of 5 Readiness Review of Procedures, Imple-mentation Verification Documentation, Module 3A 3 of 5 Readiness Review of Procedures, Imple-mentation Verification Documentation, Module 3A 4 of 5 Readiness Review of Procedures, Imple-mentation Verification Documentation, Module 3A 5 of 5 Readiness Review of Procedures, Imple-mentation Verification Documentation, Module 3A The inspectors reviewed each verification process finding and the proposed corrective action for these findings.
The proposed corrective action appeared adequate. Corrective action completion, however, was not verified.
An audit is scheduled by the operations QA group to verify corrective action completion. One inspector followup item was identified pending QA comple-tion of this audit and this is discussed in paragraph 4.b.
Within this area, no violations or deviations were identified.
-
-
-
- -.
..
- -