IR 05000397/1979011
| ML17272A547 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Columbia  |
| Issue date: | 06/13/1979 |
| From: | Carlson J, Johnson P, Sternberg D NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17272A546 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-397-79-11, NUDOCS 7907270290 | |
| Download: ML17272A547 (5) | |
Text
- Report No.
50-397/79-1
,. Docket No.
U, S ~
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT
REGION V
License No.
.Safeguards Group Washington Public Power Supply System P. 0.
Box 968 Richland, Washington 99352 ashington Nuclear Project No.
2 (WNP-2)
WNP-2 Site, Benton County, Washington
- .Inspection conducted
-Inspectors:
P.
.
nso
, Reactor Inspector J.
D.
rlson, Reactor Inspector Date Signed
~(z
~
Date Signed Approved By:
D.
M.
S e nberg, Chief, Reactor Pr'eject Section 1,
Reactor perations and Nuclear Support Branch
-,Sun'mary:
Date Signed 0/j~/pg Date Signed Ins ection on Ma 29-31 1979 Re ort No. 50-397 79-11
~Ad:
i
.
di P
i f
p ti 1 tl'll'g.
quality assurance for preoperational testing, and resolution of comments on overall preoperational test program (see Report No. 50-397/78-08).
In addition, the inspectors toured the plant to obtain an independent update of plant construction status.
The inspection involved 24.inspector-hours onsite by two NRC inspectors.
Results:
No deviations or items of noncompliance were identified.
RV Form 219 (2)
DETAILS Persons Contacted
- J.
D. Martin, Startup and Operations Manager
- D. L. Howard, NPPSS Operational gA Manager
~A. M. Sastry, Project gA Manager
- J.
R. Holder, Assistant Superintendent
- G. K. Afflerbach, Supervising Test Engineer
- J. F. Peters, Startup Administrative Supervisor
- R. L. Corcoran, Principal Operations Engineer J.
W. Hedges, Maintenance Supervisor
- S. L. Washington, Operational gA Engineer
- J.
M. Graziani, Operational gA Engineer
- S. L. Grupta, Operational gA Engineer F. Mizell, Test Engineer The inspectors also talked with other licensee personnel including test engineers and plant operators.
- Denotes those present at the exit interview.
2.
0 erational Staffin The inspector reviewed the qualifications for one plant welder.
The remainder of the operations staff will be reviewed at a later date when a plant superintendent has been appointed and the oper-ations staff has been finalized.
Ho deviations or items of noncompliance were identified.
3.
ualit Assurance for Preo erational.Testin The inspector reviewed implementation of the guality Assurance Program applicable to preoperational testing (see Report Ho.
50-397/78-08 for program review). It was noted that an operational gA audit schedule for 1979 had been issued, and two audits con-ducted since the last inspection.
The inspector reviewed the audit findings and responses for proper implementation of the audit program.
This completes the review of the applicant's implemen-tation of the Operational gA Program for Preoperational Testing.
No deviations or items of noncompliance were identifie Overall Prep erational Test Pro ram Review This inspection included followup on the inspection findings discussed in Inspection Report Nos. 50-397/78-08: and 79-02, as follows:
(78-08-02, Closed)
Interfaces with. text personnel:
Discussion of the interface between the test engineer and others, principally the shift supervisor, had been added to Section 8.6 of the Test and Startup Program Manual (TSPM).
(78-08-05, Closed)
Briefing of test personnel:
Section 8.6 of the TSPM had been revised to require a pretest briefing for all personnel involved in the test.
(78-08-06, Closed)
Test interruptions:
The documentation of test interruptions is now discussed in Section 8.6 of the TSPM.
(78-08-07, Closed)
Resolution of problems:
The applicant had revised TSP-9 of the TSPN to include "failure of a test to meet acceptance criteria" within the definition of a deficiency.
This would require the item to be documented and resolved on a Startup Problem Report form.
The inspector noted that the words
"may be" in the TSP-9 definition of a deficiency were too flexible.
The applicant stated that these words would be changed in the next revision of the procedure to state that the listed items are deficiencies although items not specifically listed may also be considered deficiencies.
(78-08-08, Open)
Distribution control:
The applicant had rev'ised TSI 8. 1 to discuss filing of the master copy and one information copy of approved test procedures.
Control of other distributed copies of THG-approved preoperational test procedures was not discussed.
The applicant stated that TSI 8.1 would be revised further to define the source of the "record copy" and to require that all copies other than the master and record copies be marked to indicate that they are uncontrolled.
(78-08-03 and 79-02-01, Open)
Test organization:
The applicant was preparing an FSAR change submittql which should resolve these items.
No deviations or items of noncompliance were identified.
Exit Interview The inspectors met with WPPSS representatives (denoted in Para-graph 1) on May 31, 1979.
The scope of tge inspection was discussed as identified in Paragraphs 2,
3 and II
'I 0