IR 05000358/1979016
| ML19242A091 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Zimmer |
| Issue date: | 06/12/1979 |
| From: | Menning J, Warnick R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19242A086 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-358-79-16, NUDOCS 7907310222 | |
| Download: ML19242A091 (5) | |
Text
jw
.
.
.
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND EKFORCEMENT P.rJION III Report No. 50-358/79-16 Docket No. 50-358 License No. CPPR-88
.
Licensee:
Cincinnati Gas and Electric Company 139 East 4th Street Cincinnati. OH 45201 Facility Name:
Wm. H. Zimmer Nuclear Power Station Inspection At:
Wm. H. Zimmer Site, Moscow, OH Inspection Conducted:
May 2-4, 29 and 30, 1979
)?fG'-
/v,-
Inspector:
J. E. Menning (' /2-79
,C F L U u d 2 Approved By:
R. F. Warnick, Chief ( '/2 - 7 9 Reactor Projects Section 2
.spection Summary Inspection on May 2-4, 29 and 30, 1979 (Report No. 50-358/79-16)
Areas Inspected: Routine, unannounced inspection of operating and surveillance procedures.
In addition, this report documents the meeting between licensee manageraent and RIII on May 4,1979 to dis-cuss the proposed assignment of a resident inspector at Zimmer, and RIII's accompanyment of Congressman Gradison during bis tour of the site on May 29, 1979. The inspection effort involved 17 inspector-manhours onsite by one NRC inspector.
The meetings involved 15 man-hours onsite by four NRC representatives.
Results:
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
79073102zz t, o 2 o c,
~
'
df
,'
.
DETAILS 1.
Personnel Contacted
- J.
Schott, Station Superintendent P. King, Assistant Station Superintendent J. Kammerer, Of fice and Document Supervisor R. Link, Operating Supervisor
.
J. Wald, Station Quality Engineer
- Denotes those attending the exit interview.
2.
Review of Operating and Surveillance Procedures The inspector reviewed selected operating and surveillance test procedures which had been approved by the licensee.
a.
Reviews of the following procedures resulted in comments (noted below). However, during this inspection the inspector reviewed subsequent revisions of these pro-cedures which resolved the inspector's concerns.
OP.RE.01 - Residual Heat Removal System (Rev. O, March 30, 1978)
The valve checklist improperly listed the locations of several valves inside containment and the required positions of several valves were not specified on this checklist.
OP.SC.01 - Standby Liquid Control System (Rev. O, May 18, 1978)
The startup section of the procedure did not correctly reflect the anticipated operation of cleanup system isolation valves on standby liquid control system initiation.
,
Instructions for operations personnel on how to estimate when the systeu storage tank will drain to the level of the pump suction line appeared to be inadequate.
The numerical designations for several valves were incorrectly specified in the procedure.
-2-A i' Li 1/,
/u)
i-
.
<
.
Water qualitp requirements were not adequately specified in the section of the procedure dealing with system flushing.
The valve cF-cklist incorrectly listed the locations of several valves inside containment.
OP.LP.01 - Low Pressure Core Spray System (Rev. O, March 28, 1978)
_
The control switch checklist appeared to require several switch positions which were inconsistent with actual control board labeling.
OP.HP.01 - High Pressure Core Spray System (Rev. O, May 18, 1978)
The control switch checklist appeared to require a position for one switch which waa inconsistent with actual control board labeling.
b.
Reviews of the following procedures resulted in comments (noted below).
The inspector will follow the status of the resolution of these concerns during future inspections.
OP.RT.01 - Reactor Water Cleanup System (Rev. O, September 29, 1978)
The filling and venting section of the procedure appeared to specify intorrect positions for several valves.
OP.RD.01 - Control Rod Drive Hydraulic System (Rev.
1, December 5, 1978)
The fill, vent and startup section of the procedure did not provide for the adjustment of drive water differential pressure, check / adjustment of stabilizing valve flow or the closing of system vents.
The valve checklist did not specify positions for several valves.
OP.DC.01 - DC Distribution System (Rev. O, April 6, 1978)
The precautions and limitations section of the procedure appeared not to give enough guidance on how to determine if float / equalizer potentiometers are properly adjusted.
-3-d A ')
9/z
'*L.
l U
.
-
.
OP.RP.01 - Reactor Protection System (Rev. O, November 16, 1978)
Instructions provided in the startup section of the pro-cedure were incorrect in that the procedure calls for the reset of RPS trips prior to the energizing of the RPS logic.
EC. SAD.' 3 - Jumper and Lif ted Wire Control (Rev, 0,
-
October 26, 1978)
The procedure did not appear to adequately define the range of applicability.
The procedure did not clearly establish that the bypass devices are to be limited in number and under the direct control of the shift supervisor when not in use.
Requirements for independent verification were not included as required by ANSI N18.7-1976.
No requirements existed for periodic review of the jumper and lifted wire log by the shift supervisor.
c.
Reviews of the following procedures resulted in no comments from the inspector.
OP.RI.01 - Reactor Core Isolation Cooling System (Rev. O, November 16, 1978)
ME.SDC.810 - 125V DC Battery Quarterly Checks (Rev. O, December 19, 1978)
ME.SDC.809 - 125V DC Battery Weekly Checks (Rev. O, December 19, 1978)
No items of noncompliance er deviations were identified.
3.
Meeting _
_h Licensee Management on May 4, 1979 On May 4, 1979, Messrs. G. Roy, R. Heishman, and J. Menning from Region III met with licensee representatives Messrs.
E. Borgmann, S. Salay, J. Schott and P. King to discuss plans for the resident inspection program at the Wm. H. Zimmer facility.
During this meeting, which was requested by Region III, the licensee was informed that J. Menning was the designated resident-4-db2
.
-
'
.
inspector for Zimmer and that Region III intended to place him onsite by mid-July, 1979.
In addition, the activities of the resident inspector during the preoperational test program were discussed in very general terms along with the logistics of setting up the resident's office at the Zimmer site.
Mr. J. Schott was identified by the licensee as their primary contact on matters concerning the setting up of.he resident inspector's office.
.
4.
Meeting at Zimmer Site on May 29, 1979 On May 29, 1979, hessrs. G. Roy, T. Harpster and J. Menning from Region III accompanied Congressman W. Gradison and several members of his staff on a tour of the Zimmer site.
The tour was conducted by licensee representatives Messrs. E. Borgmann and B. Culver.
During the course of this tour and subsequent discussions, the Region III representatives responded to questions concerning the inspection program and provided the Congressman and his staf f with a summary of the Zimmer regu-latory history.
5.
Exit Interview The inspector met with Mr. J. Schott at the conclusion of the inspection on May 30, 1979.
The inspector summarized the scope and findings of the inspection.
-5-
'ub Ac>
tun t