IR 05000358/1979017

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
IE Insp Rept 50-358/79-17 on 790918-20 & 1211-12.No Noncompliance Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Review of Procedures,Nondestructive Examination Data Repts, Personnel Certifications & Various Sys Radiographs
ML19257C413
Person / Time
Site: Zimmer
Issue date: 01/02/1980
From: Danielson D, Ward K
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML19257C408 List:
References
50-358-79-17, NUDOCS 8001290080
Download: ML19257C413 (7)


Text

.

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

.

OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT

REGION III

,

Report No. 50-358/79-17 Docket No. 50-358 License No. CPPR-88 Licensee:

Cincinnati Gas & E3ectric Company 139 East 4th Street Cincinnati, OH 45201 Facility Name:

W. H. Zimmer Nuclear Power Station Inspection At:

W. H. Zimmer Site, Moscow, Ohio Inspection Conducted: September 18 - 20, and December 11 - 12, 1979 Inspector:

//A//29

'

'

huch Approved By:

D. H. Danielson, Chief

/ c9 8 0 Engineering Support Section 2

'

Inspection Summary Inspection on September 18 - 21, and December 11 - 12, 1979 (Report No.

50-358/7)

Areas Inspected: Review of procedures, nondestructive examination (NDE)

data reports, personnel certifications, and radiographs of various systems. The inspection involved a total of 25 inspection hours onsite by one NRC inspector.

Results: No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.

18 M 048 8001290

.

DETAILS

-

Persons Contacted Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company (CG & E)

>

  • W. Schwiers, Principal QA and Standards Engineer
  • R. Woods, QA and Standards Engineer W. Murray, Engineer R. Ehas, Lead QA Engineer Kaiser Engineers, Incorporated (KEI)
  • K. Baumgarten, Acting QA Manager A. Pallon, Welding /NDE QA Engineer Peabody Testing Magnaflux Corporation (PTM)

A. Sellars, NDE Superviosr Nuclear Energy Services, Incorpcrated (KES)

R. Bott, NDE Superviosr R. Ziebar, Level II Radiographer Hartford Steam Boiler Engineering and Insurance Company (HSB)

T. McCox, Authorized Nuclear Inservice Inspector (ANII)

The inspector also contracted and interviewed other licensee and contractor employees.

  • Denotes those present at the last exit interview on December 12, 1979.

Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings (Closed) Noncompliance (358/78-30-01): Densitometer calibration. The densitometer was returned to the manufacturer for rework and recalibration.

It was returned to the site and is now in storage not being used.

(0 pen) Noncompliance (358/78-30-02):

Of the seventeen discrepancies found on this one noncompliance, the following three items remain open.

Item Sb (5): The weld HP-32 has not been reradiographed. The film density is unacceptable.

Item Sc (4): The weld HPK-17 has not been reradiographed. The lead letter

"F" was not on the film adjacent to the penetrameter.

183a 049-2-

.

Item Sc (8): The weld HP-1 has not been reradiographed. The penetrameters

.

have not been shimed.

The licensee stated that they should be closed out the first part of 1980.

Functional or Program Areas Inspected

,

1.

General Information Reference a.

NRC Report No. 50-358/78-19 b.

NRC Report No. 50-358/78-23 c.

NRC Report No. 50-358/78-30 d.

Letter QA-1107, dated March 2, 1979, to Mr. J. G. Keppler from Mr. E. A. Borgmann. (Formal response to the items of noncompliance).

Preservice inspection (PSI) is to be completed approximately January, 1980.

2.

Review of Revised and New Preservice Inspection Procedures The inspector reviewed the following NES procedures.

e.

Ultrasonic Examination Procedure for Closure Head Welds, No. 80A117: Revision 0, January 19, 1979.

b.

Ultrasonic ' aamination Procedure for Closure Head and Recircula-tion Pump and Valve Studs and Nuts, No. 80A1175, Revision 1, December 27 1978.

c.

Automated Ultrasonic Examination Procedures for Reactor Vessel Nozzle Inner Radius No. 80A1176, Revision 0, December 27, 1978.

d.

Manual Ultrasonic Examination Procedures for Nozzle Inner Radius Areas, No. 80A1177, Revision 0.

e.

General Magnetic Particle Examination, No. 80A1591, Revision 1, Janua ry 12, 1979.

f.

Ultrasonic Examination Procedures for Control Rod Drive Housing Welds, No. 80A1184, Revision 0, January 3, 1979.

No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.

182R 050-3-

.

3.

Review of Data and Audit Reports The inspector reviewed the following:

a.

Information available for the PSI activities to date.

,

b.

Audit of NES by Sargent & Lundy (S & L)

c.

Audit of NES by CG & E.

No items of noncompliance or deviations we'.e identified.

4.

NDE Personnel Certificates The following NES NDE personnel certifications were reviewed and found to be in accordance with SNT-TC-1A, 1975 Edition.

NAME UT PT VT MT R. Barnes II II R. Bott II II D. Burrelli II K. Defel I

J. Jensen II II S. Meeach II II J. Robinson II II G. Sechler II II J. Wolf II II K. Dew II II II H. Shallis II II No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.

5.

Independent Inspection The inspector interpreted the radiographs and reviewed the reports of the following welds in accordance with ASME Section III, 1971 Edition, Summer 1972 Addenda and the applicable procedures that were used.

(Reference item of noncompliance identified as 358/78-30-02)

Line Weld Diameter Thickness Date RT 1HP06C4 HP17A 4"

0.237" 10/10/77 1HP01A20 10HP 28" 0.625" 3/12/76 IWR44B6 WR-1 6"

0.280" 11/27/76 IWR52A6 WR-2 6"

0.280" 11/23/76 IWR52A6 WR-3 6"

0.280" 2/16/77 IWR44DA2 WR-19 4"

0.237" 11/23/76 1RT01AA4 RT-K-99 4"

0.337" 6/1/78 18M 051-4-

.

Line Weld Diameter Thickness Date RT

1RT08A4 RT-139A 4"

0.337" 1/13/77 1RT08A4 RT-140 4"

0.337" 1/12/77 1HP08C3 HP-19B 3"

0.438" 10/19/77 1HP08C3 HP"19C 3"

0.438"

,10/11/77 1HP08C3 HP-19D F'

O.438" 11/2/77 IHP08C3 HP-19E 3"

0.531" 10/7/77 1HP08CA14 HP-19F 3"

0.438" 10/21/77 1HP080C3 HP-19G 3"

0.438" 10/13/77 1HP08C3 HP-19H 3"

0.438" 10/31/77 1HP06AA HP-19K 3"

0.438" 12/20/78 ILP02B-10 LP-6 10" 0.593" 8/12/78 1FC01B12 FC-9 12" 0.375" 3/28/77

,

ILP04B4 Lp49 4"

0.237" 8/12/76 1FC02ABB FC23 8"

0.322" 12/17/76 ILPO4B4 LP55 4"

0.237" 3/ ~./ 77 ILC19AA2 LC-26D-1 2"

0.218" 4/2,/79 ILC05A-3 LC-7 3"

0.216" 7/21/78 ILP14C4 LP66 4"

0.237" 10/22/76 ILP09C3 LP41 3"

0.216" 4/7/77 ILP22A-6 LP-K1 6"

0.280" 3/11/77 1DG18AA8 DG-K-31 8"

0.322" 10/3/77 1CY50AA2 1/2 CYK-79 2 1/2" 0.203" 9/30/77 1DG18AA8 DG-K-33 8"

0.322" 10/17/77 1FC39CA6 FC34A 6"

0.280" 11/29/77 1FC32AB8 FCK-74 8"

0.322" 6/12/78 IFC14ABD FCK101 8"

0.322" 3/10/78 1HP08C3 HP52 3"

0.438" 10/31/77 11N01A3 INK 49 3"

0.216" 11/19/78 11N09B-3 INK 50 3"

0.216" 11/19/78 ILP02A12 LP19 14" 0.375" 6/01/76 1HP21A4 HP53 4"

0.237" 9/21/76

'LP01A20-22 LP29B 20" 0.375" 2/11/77 ILP02B10 LP4 10" 0.593" 5/24/76 IHP21A4 HP-54 4"

0.237" 9/8/76 1HP17A3 HP-56C 3"

0.216" 9/12/77 ILC10A-4 LC-4 4"

0.237" 7/05/78 1FWO2EA1843 FW52A 18.43" 1.351" 4/05/77 ILC0A-3 LC-5 3"

0.216" 7/13/78 1FW02GA18 FW-59 12" 1"

4/11/76 1M.926AB10 MS61 10" 0.594" 10/29/76 1MS24AB3 MSK5 3"

0.300" 6/28/77 IMS24AA3 MSK6 3"

0.300" 9/15/77 1MS24AC3 MSK8 3"

0.300" 10/3/77 IMS24F4 MSK10 3"

0.300" 9/8/77 1R12086 RI-9 6"

0.432" 2/28/77 1R101B4 RIK29 4"

0.438" 6/14/78 1RR02CK10 RRB21 10" 0.594" 6/2/76 183 1 052-5-

Line Weld Diameter Thickness Date RT

.

1RR02AA20 RRA33 10" 0.594" 9/7/76 1RH11C4 RH228 4"

0.237" 1/6/77 1RR02AA20 RRA8 20" 1/030" 8/12/76 3/29/77 1RH12CB8 RH195 3"

G.438"

,

1RH12A8 RH196 3"

0.438" 3/25/77 1RH12A8 RH196A 8"

0.500" 3/24/77 1RH12A8 RH196B 8"

0.500" 4/4/77 1RH12A8 RH196C 8"

0.500" 4/14/77 1RH12A8 RH196D 8"

0.500" 4/13/77 1MS26AB10 MS60 10" 0.594" 11/1/76 1FC22A6 FC136 6"

0.280" 4/12/77 ILP22A-6 LP-K-26 6"

0.280" 3/28/79 1HP03A14 HP37 10" 0.718" 7/13/76 1HPOSA10 38HP 10" 0.718" 6/11/76 1HP03A14 HP-25 14" 0.938" 2/11/77 1DG-10AA-28 DG-6 28" 0.437" 6/17/77 IDG-09BB-24 DG-2 24" 0.375" 5/23/77 IFC034 FCK-24 12" 0.375" 11/9/77 The above welds were selected as being the final radiographic and report review for turnover prior to operation. As of September 1979, the following reviews had been made. The September 9, 1979, inspec-tion by the NRC inspector still found discrepancies. The licensee then hired NES to re-review all reports for accuracy and radiographs for techniques only. As of December 9 1979, NES had reviewed 812 radiographic welds and found 509 unacceptable because of inaccurate reports or unacceptable radiographic techniques. There are approxi-mately 60 welds to be radiographed because of unacceptable techniques.

NES has approximately 2500 more radiographs to review and this will consist of interpreting the radiographs for weld quality and techniques and reviewing the reports for accuracy.

The radiographic film packages reviewed by the RIII inspector had been subjected to one or all of the following reviews:

a.

Peabody Magnaflux Corporation A Level I or Level II radigographer performed all the radiography and a Level II interpreted the radiographs for weld quality and techniques and completed the reports.

b.

Kaiser Engineers, Inc.

A radiographic film interpreter Level II interpreted the radio-graphs for weld quality and techniques and reviewed the reports for accuracy.

1839 053-6-

.

c.

The Authorized Nuclear Inspector

-

The ANII interpreted several radiographs for weld quality and technique and reviewed the reports for accuracy.

d.

OCONAM

'

A Level II radiographer was contracted to interpret several radiographs for weld quality and techniques and review the reports for accuracy.

The Cincinnati Gas & Ijectric Company e.

As of a result of the NRC noncompliance in December 1978, a cognizant engineer from the licensee's Quality Assurance Standards Section received each radiograph package prior to filing with the quality assurance records in accordance with the CG & E letter QA-1107. This consisted of a unqualified radiographer checking the reports for completeness and varifying that there were radiographs in the packages.

f.

Kaiser Engineers, Inc.

A radiographic film interpreter Level II, in some cases was the same individual that interpreted the radiographs months / years before, reviewed the radiograph packages critically prior to system turnover in accordance with the CG & E letter QA-1107.

This consisted of checking accuracy of the report and verifying that there were radiographs in the packages.

No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.

Exit Interview The inspector met with site representatives at the conclusion of the in-spection. The inspector summarized the secpe and findings of the inspec-tion noted in this report.

1839_054-7-