IR 05000358/1979038
| ML19290E001 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Zimmer |
| Issue date: | 01/10/1980 |
| From: | Daniels F, Warnick R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19290D995 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-358-79-38, NUDOCS 8002290628 | |
| Download: ML19290E001 (6) | |
Text
.
O U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT
REGION III
Report No. 50-358/79-38 Docket No. 50-358 License No. DPPR-88 Licensee: Cincinnati Gas and Electric Company 139 East 4th Street Cincinnati, OH 45201 Facility Name:
Wm. H. Zimmer Nuclear Power Plant Inspection At:
Wm. Zimmer Site, Moscow, Ohio Inspection Conducted: December 3-5, 10-14, 17-21, 27, 28 and 31, 1979
-
'3
-
T.9.l n
Inspector:
F. T. Daniels
!, Io
, E'o T, 4. t 4, f7 e-- -
Approved By:
R. F. Warnick, Chief I ( 10 I6'O Reactcc Projects Section 2 Inspection Summary Inspection on December 3-5, 10-14, 17-21, 27, 28, and 31, 1979 (Report No. 50-358/79-38)
Areas Inspected: Routine, announced inspection of Preoperational Test Records, Safety tagging procedure, daily plant tours and Corporate Quality Assurance Manual. This inspection involved 128 inspector manhours onr.ite by the NRC Resident Inspector.
Results: No items of non-compliance or deviations were identified.
8002200 d2 7
.
DETAILS
.
1.
Personnel Contacted J. Schott, Station Superintendent
- P.
King, Assistant Station Superintendent
- R.
Link, Operating Supervisor
- J.
Wald, Station Quality Engineer S. Martin, Startup Test Coordinator
- R. Ehas, QA&S Engineer W. Schwiers, Principal QA&S Engineer S. Swain, Construction Manager R. Wood, QA&S Engineer
- M.
Hill, Document Control Supervisor
- W.
Craig, Assistant Quality Engineer
- R. Mayhugh, I&C Foreman
- D.
Outcalt, Fire Prevention and Protection Engineer and others of the station staff
- Personnel attending monthly exit meeting 2.
Preoperational Test Records a.
Records to be maintained (1) Procedure Review The inspector reviewed the following to verify that admin-istrative controls and responsibilities have been estab-lished to maintain records of; preoperational test proce-dures and results, corrective and preventative mainten-ance QA/QC audits and surveillance, personnel qualifica-tions, design changes and modifications, component / system and structural turnovers, and personnel training.
- DC. SAD.01 - Document Control (Revision 01, September 25, 1978)
- SU.ACP.05 - Conduct of Preoperational Tests (Revision 7, September 7, 1979)
- MM. SAD.01 - Station Maintenance (Revicion 01, May 14, 1979)
- MM. SAD.02 - Preventive Maintenance Program (Revision 01, July 9, 1979)
- QA. SAD.01 - Quality Assurance (Revision 01, September 27, 1978)
-2-
.
- TR. SAD.01 - Station Training Program (Revision 00, May 11,
1978)
- TR. SAD.02 - Fire Brigade Training Program (Revision 00, June 20, 1979)
- SU.PRP.13 - Processing of Engineering Change (Revision 04, March 28, 1979)
- SU.ACP.07 - Qualifications of Preop and Startup Test Personnel (Revision 04, February 9, 1979)
- RE. SAD.02 - Surveillance Program (Revision 01, April 4, 1979)
- SU.PRP.01 - System Release and Turnover (Revision 11, November 29, 1979)
(2)
Implementation of Administrative Controls The inspector reviewed the implementation of the following to verify that records were being maintained in accordance with the administrative controls specified.
- SU.PRP.01 - System Release and Turnover (Revision 11, November 29, 1979)
- SU.ACP.07 - Qualifications of Preop and Startup Test Personnel (Revision 04, February 9, 1979)
- TR. SAD.01 - Station Training Program (Revision 00, May 11, 1978)
(3) Findings Training records of various individuals at the station had not been. reviewed or documentation to verify this review had not been kept. This item was brought to the attention of all group supervisors during their daily meeting with the Plant Superintendent and is to be corrected by January 15, 1980. This is considered an open item (50-358/79-38-01)
and will be followed up on future inspections.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were found in this area.
b.
Record Storage (1) Procedure Review-3-
.
The inspector reviewed the following to verify that record
.
storage controls have been established which; define the record storage location for the types of records identified in paragraph 2.a(1), designate a custodian (s) in charge of record storage, describes the filing system (s) to be used to allow for the retrieval of records, establish a method for verifying that the records received for storage are in agreement with any attendant tranumittal documents, govern access to files and for maintaining an accountability of records removed, provide methods for filing supplemental information and disposing of superseded records
- DC.DCP.01, Receiving, Logging and Routing of Documents, Records, and Reports (Revision 00, September 14, 1979)
- DC.DCP.02, Transmittal of Documents and Records (Revision 01, September 14, 1979)
- DC.DCP.03, Operation of the Central File (Revision 02, September 14, 1979)
- DC.DCP.04, Audits (Revision 01, September 14, 1979)
- DC.DCP.05, Destruction of Documents, Records, and Reports (Revision 00, September 14, 1979)
- DC.DCP.06, Procedure Control (Revision 02, September 14, 1979)
(2)
Implementation of Administrative Controls The inspector examined the record storage facility to deter-mine if record storage locations for the records identified in paragraph 2.a(1) were defined.
The inspector verified by interview of the Document Control Supervisor that he understood the requirements as setforth in the Document Control Procedures.
(3) Findings The master procedure index listed the different types of records stored and gave a listing of each sub-type, but as to specific location in the Document Control Room, it was not entered. The Document Control Supervisor stated a number / lettering system would be implemented and this system would be reflected in the master procedure index.
This is considered an open item (50-358/79-38-02) and will be followed up to verify implementation during subsequent inspections.
-4-
.
No items of non-compliance or deviation were identified in
,
this area.
c.
Record Retention (1) The inspector reviewed DC. SAD.01, Document Control, Re-vision 01, September 25, 1978 and verified that record retention periods for the records identified in paragraph 2.a(1) have been established.
(2) The inspector reviewed RM. SAD.01, Records Management, Re-vision 00, July 3, 1978 and found that responsibilities have not been assigned for establishing retention periods for new records. The Document Control Supervisor stated that a revision to the procedure would be made which estab-lished the responsibilities for determining retention per-iods for new records. This is considered an open item (50-358/ 79-38-03) and will be followed up on subsequent itspections.
3.
Plant Tours The inspector conducted daily tours and the following items were found. All items, except as noted, were brought to the attention of the appropriate supervisor and proper corrective action was taken.
a.
Nuts, bolts and miscellaneous material found in cable trays in the Cable Spreading Room.
b.
Radiaiton Area sign hanging on IB Diesel Generator Room door.
This sign was left after radiographing of pipe in D/G room. A problem was brought out by this occurance, that being; in some instances the Shif t Supervisor was not being informed of the completion of radiographing. This is considered an open item (50-358/79-38-04) and will be followed up on subsequent inspec-tions to insure that proper notifications are being made.
c.
Exception release tags on 1A and IC RHR Pumps both read IE12-C00ZA.
d.
Bubble air supply to IA and IB Reactor Building Drain Tanks was abnormal. (1A had maximum air and IB had no air supply).
Fire extinguisher at the Northeast quadrant of Reactor Building e.
on the 546 foot level was improperly stowed.
f.
Terminal block for Reactor Vessel Water Level indicator in the rear of Panel 603 in the Control Room was broken and entire panel was covered with concrete chips, welding slag, dirt and cigarette butts.
-5-
-
.
g.
Fire extinguishers in process computer and refueling floor were past due for the monthly inspection.
h.
Flow indicator piping (IRTB8AA 3/4") off of Reactor Vessel Bottom Drain line was cut in half and leaking water into the drywell sump area.
It had been cut to replace a section af the piping with 310 Stainless Steel, but none of the Operations personnel (Shift Supervisor or Nuclear Control Operator) were aware. The water was issuing out because of the flow through the CRD mechanisms which was being drained out of the vessel via the bottom head drain.
4.
Corporate Quality Assurance Manual The inspector received a copy of the approved Corporate QA Manual as referenced in IE Inspection Report 50-378/79-05.
The inspector for-warded a copy to the Region III Quality Assurance Group for review.
5.
Safety Tagging The inspector reviewed, EC. SAD.02, Safety Tagging, revision 01, November 9, 1978, to verify the only personnel allowed to operate through safety tags were the Electrical Operating Test Department and that a time limit for doing that was established.
No items of non-compliance or deviation were found in this area.
6.
Exit Meetings Weekly reviews of inspection findings were conducted with the Station Superintendent. The monthly exit meeting was held at the conclusion of the month, with the personnel noted in paragraph 1.
The inspector summarized the scope and findings of the inspection. The inspector emphasized the necessity for cooperation and the free flow of informa-tion between the different organizations responsible within Cincinnati Gas and Electric Company for construction, peroperational and startup testing, and operation of Wm. H. Zimmer Nuclear Power Station.
6-
-