IR 05000354/1986028

Physical Security Insp Rept 50-354/86-28 on 860527-30.No Violation Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Quality of Training Program for Security Personnel & Ability to Carry Out Assigned Duties

ML20203J088
Person / Time
Site:	Hope Creek
Issue date:	07/15/1986
From:	Bailey R, Keimig R, Martin W NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To:
Shared Package
ML20203J074	List: IR 05000354/1986028 ML20203J071
References
50-354-86-28, NUDOCS 8608050178
Download: ML20203J088 (3)

Text

{{#Wiki_filter:r

.
.

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION I

Report No. 50-354/86-28

Docket N License No. NPF-50 Licensee: Public Service Electric & Gas Company Post Office Box 236 Hancocks Bridge, New Jersey 08038 Facility Name: Hope Creek Nuclear Generating Station Inspection At: Hancocks Bridge, New Jersey Inspection Conducted: May 27-30, 1986 Date of Last Physical Security Inspection: January 27-30, 1986 Type of Inspection: Routine Physical Security Inspection Inspectors: d Physic e 7- date

     '
     /h-[[

R. J aile ecurity inspector Y c 4/ 7 /d date Sb W'. G. Martin al Sec[/rity inspector Approved by: [ 7- / r - s (. f R.Section, Keimig, ief, feguards date DRS Inspection Summary: Routine Special Physical Securit May 27-30, 1986 (Inspection Report No. 50-354/86-2h] y Inspection on Areas Inspected: The quality of the training program for security personnel and the ability to carry out their assigned dutie The inspection consisted of: reexaminations of statistically selected sample of security personnel in qualification /requalification tasks; observations of examination administra-tion; interviews of security personnel; and review and evaluation of examin-ation result Results: The inspectors determined that security personnel are sufficiently knowledgeable to carry out their assigned dutie PDR ADOCK 05000354 0 PDR

.
%

DETAILS Persons Contacted P. Moeller, Manager, Site Protection J. Baylish, Nuclear Security Manager D. Renwick, Senior Security Supervisor M. Ivanick, Nuclear Security Support Supervisor The inspectors also interviewed other Public Service Electric and Gas Company employees and members of the Yoh contract security forc . MC 30703 - Exit Interview i The inspectors met with the licensee representatives listed in paragraph

'

1 at the conclusion of the inspection on May 30, 1986. At that time, the purpose, scope and results of the inspection were reviewed. During this meeting, the licensee provided a status of security personnel reexamina-tions and re-qualifications and stated that all testing had been completed as schedule No written material was provided to the licensee by the inspectors during this inspectio . MC 81501 - Training and Qualification Program (T&Q) The objective of this inspection was to have the licensee demonstrate that individuals in the security force are trained to perform the security related tasks to which they are assigned as described in the licensee's physical security and/or contingency plan. To meet this objective, the inspectors utilized a statistical sampling plan to achieve results at a 95% confidence level. The inspectors requested the licensee to test a statistical sample of security force members in the tasks to which they were previously deemed qualified. The individuals who were to be tested were randomly selected by the inspectors from the roster of personnel qualified in each of three job categories: Supervisors /Amed Personnel; Watchpersons (Monitors); and Central and Secondary Alarm Station (CAS/SAS) Operators. Three hundred and seven examinations, which included firearms qualifications, were administered by the licensee and monitored, on a random basis, by the inspectors. The inspectors reviewed and evaluated the examination results and interviewed examiners, other security personnel, and licensee and contractor management , representatives.

! Testing Program ! Following is a description of the testing program requested by the j inspectors and administered by the licensee for the three job categories.

.

. -m -- . __ , , - . - , - - - , _ -.,-._- _.__._ -- _ . - - . - _ - _ _ . - _ - - - - - _ - - . _ - . _

o e 3 Basic Testing for Security Personnel Three basic task specific tests are used by the licensee to qualify individuals for assignment to the job categories of Supervisors / Armed Personnel, CAS/SAS Operators and Watchperson One hundred and fifty-two individuals were randomly selected by the inspectors. A total of 224 tests were administered to these individuals by the licensee. Three individuals each failed one tes Weapons Testing for Supervisors / Armed Personnel In addition to the three basic task specific tests discussed above, Supervisors / Armed Personnel are required to qualify on weapons through written and firing range testin (1) Range Testing Twenty-three armed personnel were tested in hand and shoulder weapons at a firing range on May 29, 1986. This testing was monitored by the NRC inspectors. Three individuals failed a portion of the weapons test. Each individual was innediately retrained and satisfactorily passed the tes (2) Written Testing (a) The twenty-three individuals, who were tested on the firing range, were also administered the written test for this task. There were no failure (b) Twenty-three different individuals were administered a written examination in armed response. Two individuals

failed the test. They were immediately retrained, reex-l amined and satisfactorily passed the tes CAS/SAS Operator Testing Fourteen individuals were randomly selected by the inspectors from the total number of individuals in this job category. Each was tested by the licensee and met the licensee's established standard for the positio . Testing Program Results The inspectors determined that the members of the security force are ade-quately trained to carry out their assigned duties and responsibilitie Remedial training was promptly administered to all individuals who failed any portion of the tests included in the testing program. The retraining was effective in that each individual passed the test the second tim Overall test results indicate that, at the 95% confidence level, a minimum of 95% of the security force personnel are sufficiently

knowledgeable to carry out their assigned dutie }}