IR 05000354/1986028
| ML20203J088 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Hope Creek |
| Issue date: | 07/15/1986 |
| From: | Bailey R, Keimig R, Martin W NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20203J074 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-354-86-28, NUDOCS 8608050178 | |
| Download: ML20203J088 (3) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:r . . U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION I
Report No. 50-354/86-28
Docket No.
50-354 License No. NPF-50 Licensee: Public Service Electric & Gas Company Post Office Box 236 Hancocks Bridge, New Jersey 08038 Facility Name: Hope Creek Nuclear Generating Station Inspection At: Hancocks Bridge, New Jersey Inspection Conducted: May 27-30, 1986 Date of Last Physical Security Inspection: January 27-30, 1986 Type of Inspection: Routine Physical Security Inspection Inspectors: d 7- /h-[[ e R. J aile Physic ecurity inspector ' date 4/ 7 /d Sb Y c W'. G. Martin al Sec[/rity inspector date Approved by: [ 7- / r - s (. f R. Keimig, ief, feguards date Section, DRS 50-354/86-2h] y Inspection on Inspection Summary: Routine Special Physical Securit May 27-30, 1986 (Inspection Report No.
Areas Inspected: The quality of the training program for security personnel and the ability to carry out their assigned duties.
The inspection consisted of: reexaminations of statistically selected sample of security personnel in qualification /requalification tasks; observations of examination administra-tion; interviews of security personnel; and review and evaluation of examin-ation results.
Results: The inspectors determined that security personnel are sufficiently knowledgeable to carry out their assigned duties.
8608050178 860729 PDR ADOCK 05000354
PDR
. % DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted P. Moeller, Manager, Site Protection J. Baylish, Nuclear Security Manager D. Renwick, Senior Security Supervisor M. Ivanick, Nuclear Security Support Supervisor The inspectors also interviewed other Public Service Electric and Gas Company employees and members of the Yoh contract security force.
2.
MC 30703 - Exit Interview i The inspectors met with the licensee representatives listed in paragraph ' 1 at the conclusion of the inspection on May 30, 1986. At that time, the purpose, scope and results of the inspection were reviewed. During this meeting, the licensee provided a status of security personnel reexamina-tions and re-qualifications and stated that all testing had been completed as scheduled.
No written material was provided to the licensee by the inspectors during this inspection.
3.
MC 81501 - Training and Qualification Program (T&Q) The objective of this inspection was to have the licensee demonstrate that individuals in the security force are trained to perform the security related tasks to which they are assigned as described in the licensee's physical security and/or contingency plan. To meet this objective, the inspectors utilized a statistical sampling plan to achieve results at a 95% confidence level. The inspectors requested the licensee to test a statistical sample of security force members in the tasks to which they were previously deemed qualified. The individuals who were to be tested were randomly selected by the inspectors from the roster of personnel qualified in each of three job categories: Supervisors /Amed Personnel; Watchpersons (Monitors); and Central and Secondary Alarm Station (CAS/SAS) Operators. Three hundred and seven examinations, which included firearms qualifications, were administered by the licensee and monitored, on a random basis, by the inspectors. The inspectors reviewed and evaluated the examination results and interviewed examiners, other security personnel, and licensee and contractor management representatives.
, ! 4.
Testing Program ! Following is a description of the testing program requested by the j inspectors and administered by the licensee for the three job categories.
. . -m --. __,, -. - , - - -, _ -.,-._- _.__._ --_.
_. - -. - _ - _ _. - _ - - - - - _ - -. _ -. _
o
e a.
Basic Testing for Security Personnel Three basic task specific tests are used by the licensee to qualify individuals for assignment to the job categories of Supervisors / Armed Personnel, CAS/SAS Operators and Watchpersons.
One hundred and fifty-two individuals were randomly selected by the inspectors. A total of 224 tests were administered to these individuals by the licensee. Three individuals each failed one test.
b.
Weapons Testing for Supervisors / Armed Personnel In addition to the three basic task specific tests discussed above, Supervisors / Armed Personnel are required to qualify on weapons through written and firing range testing.
(1) Range Testing Twenty-three armed personnel were tested in hand and shoulder weapons at a firing range on May 29, 1986. This testing was monitored by the NRC inspectors. Three individuals failed a portion of the weapons test. Each individual was innediately retrained and satisfactorily passed the test.
(2) Written Testing (a) The twenty-three individuals, who were tested on the firing range, were also administered the written test for this task. There were no failures.
(b) Twenty-three different individuals were administered a written examination in armed response. Two individuals
failed the test. They were immediately retrained, reex-l amined and satisfactorily passed the test.
c.
CAS/SAS Operator Testing Fourteen individuals were randomly selected by the inspectors from the total number of individuals in this job category. Each was tested by the licensee and met the licensee's established standard for the position.
5.
Testing Program Results The inspectors determined that the members of the security force are ade-quately trained to carry out their assigned duties and responsibilities.
Remedial training was promptly administered to all individuals who failed any portion of the tests included in the testing program. The retraining was effective in that each individual passed the test the second time.
Overall test results indicate that, at the 95% confidence level, a minimum of 95% of the security force personnel are sufficiently knowledgeable to carry out their assigned duties.
- - - -- }}