IR 05000352/1981007
| ML20009G604 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Limerick  |
| Issue date: | 06/11/1981 |
| From: | Ebneter S, Sassani A NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20009G589 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-352-81-07, 50-352-81-7, NUDOCS 8108040466 | |
| Download: ML20009G604 (8) | |
Text
_
_ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
.
.
.
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMEflT l
Region I
'
Report No.
81-07 Docket No.
50-352 License No. CPPR-106 Priority Category A
Licensee:
Philadelphia Electric Company 2301 Market Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19101 Facility Name:
Limerick Generating Station, Unit 1 Inspection at:
Limerick, Pennsylvania Inspection conducted:
May 5-8,1981 Inspectors: 88)h-- A S-2 9 - F/
A. D. Sassa6i, Jr., Reactor Inspector date signed date signed
.
date signed 6 / 8/
Approved by:
/
5. U. Ebneter, Chief, Plant Systems Section
/ da'te signed Engineering Inspection Branch Inspection Summary:
Inspection on May 5-8, 1981 (Inspection Report 81-07)
Areas Inspected: Routine, unannounced inspection by a regional-based inspector of quali ty related documentation, records, and work activities pertaining to receipt, storage, identification, installation, inspection, nonconformance, spec 1fication, and procedure review relative to:
instrumentation components and systems associated with Reactor Core Isolation Cooling System and hardware from other plant systems.
The inspection involved 32 inspector hours onsite by one regional-based inspector.
Results: One item of noncompliance was identified.of the eignt areas examined.
Failure to follow Quality Assurance procedures, paragraph 3.
Region I Form 12 81 80MO46"6 810 17 PDR ADOCK C3OOO352 G
.
.
-
.
DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted Philadelphia Electric Company
- J. Corcoran, Field Quality Assurance Branch Head
- F. Coyle, Quality Assurance Engineer G. Lauderback, Quality Assurance Engineer
- M. McGill, Quality Assurance Engineer
- P. Naugle, Engineer Bechtel Power Corporation
- T. Altum, Lead Field Welding Engineer
- A.
Arch, Assistant Field Project Engineer S. Bowie, Lead Civil Quality Control
- C. Cecil, Lead Instrument Engineer
- B. Dragon, Quality Assurance Engineer
- H. Foster, Project Field Quality Control Engineer J. Gray, Lead Piping and Instrument Quality Control
- J. Gwin, Project Superintendent
-
K. Hamma, Instrument Design Engineer M. Held, Lead Civil Quality Control
- E. Klossin, Project Quality Assurance Engineer M. Krumyuecker, Pipe Fitter Foreman
- J. Martin, Lead Site Quality Assurance Engineer
- K. Quinter, Assistant Field Project Quality Control Engineer S. Shoemaker, Quality Assurance Engineer
- L. Snyder, Field Electrical Engineer
- D. Thompson, Assistant Field Project Quality Control Engineer
- A. Weedman, Project Field Engineer US Nuclear Regulatory Commission
- J. Durr, Senior Resident Inspector
- Denotes personnel present at exit interview.
2.
Plant Tour During the plant tour the following areas were inspected:
a.
Core Spray Pump 1BP-100, suction from suppression pool, pressure indicator, PI-52-lR0018, instrument tubing and fitting installation, area 12, elevation 177 feet.
.
.
.
-
.
The. inspector verified that craftsmen were working to as-built drawings.
Isometric drawing FJ-52-14, Revision 1.
The inspector verified that fittings and tubing were identifiable as required by Quality Control instruction, 1-1.10, Section 2.6, Revision 3.
The inspector reviewed Purchase Order No. 38724, Requisition for Bulk Piping and P&ID, M-52, Revision 13, Core Spray.
No item of noncompliance was identified.
b.
Conduit supports for conduit Nos. 1 BIO 64, 18I063, lILO63, and
,
lILO64, elevation 201 feet.
The installation of the supports utilized 1/2 inch bolts, spaced 4 inches apart.
The inspector compared this installation against Specification C-64, Installation of Expansion-Type Anchor Studs and Shells, Revision 9, Section 3.1.1, which requires 5 inch spacing for 1/2 inch bolts.
l Tha licensee presented Field Change Request, No. 4445F approving the installation.
No item of noncompliance was identified.
c.
PGCC grounding for selected control panels located in the Auxiliary Equipment Room, elevation 289 feet.
The inspector reviewed portions of the grounding system "as-built" conditions against the Special Wire and Cable Specification, MPL A61-4010, Revision 2.
No ite.;. of noncompliance was identified.
3.
Documentation Review The inspector reviewed quality related documentation and records pertain-ing to receipt, storage, identification, installation, inspection, and nonconformances to ascertain whether applicable requirements have been met.
Documentation reviewed for this determination include:
--
Limerick Generating Station, Units 1 and 2, QA Plan, Volume 1, Revision 20.
--
Job Rule No. 8031-JR-G-7, Revision 18, In-Storage Maintenance and In-Place Maintenance of Installed Equipment.
--
Job Rule No. 8031-JR-G-ll, Revision 10, Jobsite Housekeeping and Cleanliness Control.
[
~
_
.
.
.
.
~
--
Job. Rule No. 8031-JR-G-20, Revision 8, Material Receiving Report
.
Preparation and Process.
Job Rule No. 8031-JR-G-25, Revision 16, Review of Supplier Quality
--
Verification Documentation
--
Job Rule No. 8031-JR-G-32, Revision 5, Control & Installation of Instrument Items.
--
Quality Assurance Instruction, QAI-5-8, Revision 4, Procedure for Review of Job Rules.
Quality Control Instruction, I-1.10, Revision 3, Installation of
--
Instruments.
--
Specification 8031-P-301, Revision 9, Field Fabrication and Installation of Piping for Nuclear Service.
--
Specification 8031-P-300, Revision 15, Piping Material and Instrument Piping Standards.
--
Specification 8031-M-233, Revision A, Local Instrument Racks (Seismic Category I and Non-Seismic)
--
Project Special Provisions Notice, G-3.1, Revision 4, Control of Nonconforming items.
Project Special Provisions Notice, G-5.1, Revision 3, Material Receiving
--
and Storage Ccatrol.
Project Special Provisions Notice, G-6.1, Revision 3, QC Inspection
--
Plans.
--
Project Special Provisions Notice, G-7.1, Revision 2, Record Control and Filing.
--
Project Special Provisions Notice, G-8.1, Revision 1, Qualification, Evaluation, Examination, Training and Certification of Construction QC Personnel.
--
Quality Assurance Instruction, QAI-10-1, Revision 6, Procedure for QA Review of Field Inspection Manual P5P.
During the review of procedures, instructions, and records the inspector identified three (3) instances where the licensee failed to follow procedures l
or instructions.
.
-m-g
-
-ry
.
.
.
'
Limerick Generating Station, Quality Assurance Plan, Section 5.4, states,
" Quality related activities performed by PEC0 personnel are required to be accomplished in accordance with the appendices nf this plan and/or written instructions or procedures."
Quality Assurance Instruction, QAI-10-1, Revision 6, Section 7.4, states, q
"The records described in section 7.1, 7.2 and 7.3 are filed and maintained in the site QA file."
Contrary to the above, Project Special Provisions Notice, G-5.1, Revision 3 was reviewed, the approval letter transmitted, however, a signed copy of the comment letter was not in the site QA file.
Quality Assurance Instruction, QAI-10-1, Revision 6, Section 6.1.6, states,
"The Field QA Branch Head or the assigned member of the Field QA Branch shall compare the final PSP to the proposed draft previously reviewed, complete the checklist as follows:
Block No.
9.
Final PSP - check off YES or NO as appropriate if the final PSP agrees with the draft previously reviewed or has been revised to resolve PECO comments on the draft.
10.
Reviewed by enter signature and date of reviewer."
Contrary to the above, Project Special Provisions Notice, G-8.1, Revision 1 was reviewed, the approval letter was transmitted, however, the checklist in QAI-10-1 was not signed by the reviewer.
Quality Insurance Instruction, QAI-5-8, Revision 4, Section 4.2, states,
"The members of the Field QA Branch are responsible for reviewing job rules in accordance with this procedure."
Contrary to the above Job Rule, JR-G-25, Revision 16 was inadvertently placed in the QA file without being reviewed.
The licensee was informed that this was in noncompliance with 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion V, which states, in part, " Activities affecting quality shall be prescribed by documented instructions, procedures, or drawings of a type appropriate to the circumstances and... shall include appropriate quantitative or qualitative acceptance criteria...".
(81-07-01)
.
.
.
.
-
.
4.
Reactor Core Isolation Cooling System (RCIC)
The inspector reviewed quality related records and installations relative to instrumentation components to ascertain whether applicable requirements have been met in areas relating to receipt, storage, identification,
,
installation and inspection.
Areas inspected for this determination include:
--
Instrument Nos. PT-lN058A, C, E, and G; PIS-658 A, C, E, and G; LT-lN097A and E; and LIS-697A and E.
Reactor Building, elevations 217 and 253 feet and Auxiliary Equipment Room, elevation 289 feet.
--
Instrument racks 10C004, 10C035, and 10C038.
Elevations 217 and 253 feet.
--
Control panels 10C617 and 10C640.
Elevation 289 feet.
Material Receiving Reports, Nos. MRR-PE-18t4, MRR-PE-1382', MRR-PE-1481
--
and MRR-PE-1817.
--
Vendor Product Quality Certifications, Nos. PQC-A479, PQC-U733,
!
PQC-JJ368, and PQC-H12-U791.
QC Receiving Inspection Reports, Nos. QCIR-M-1-519, M-1-496, M-1-542,
--
and M-1-228.
--
In Storage and In place maintenance logs for H23-P004, H23-P035 and H23-P038.
--
Material Withdrawal Requests 51338, 51629, 51628, and 51632.
--
Panels 10C617 and 10C640, Installation of Electrical Equipment Log Nos. 13 and 14.
Auxiliary Equipment Room Arrangement Drawing, M-603, Revision 2,
--
Elevation 289 feet.
--
Instrument Location Drawing, Reactor Building, M-708, Revision 5, Elevation 253 feet.
Instrument Location Drawing, Reactor Building, M-725, Revision 3,
--
Elevation 217 feet.
.
-,
-
.
.
.
'
Installation, Operating, and Maintenance Manual, GEK-75710, Sheets
--
40 and 48.
The inspector verified manufacturer, Model No. and range for LT-LNG?7A and L and LIS-697A and E.
'
Installation, Operating and Maintenance Manual (IOM), GEK 75730.
--
The inspector verified manufacturer and model no., however, (IOM)
did not give rarge for PT-lN058A, C, E, and G and PIS-653A, C, E, and G.
This item will be the subject of a further review by an NRC inspector during a subsequent inspection.
(81-07-02)
The inspector reviewed installation inspection reports for instrument
--
racks 10C004, 10C035, and 10C038 in the following areas:
a.
Installation and Testing of Anchors, QCIR, C-64, QA-1-14.
b.
Grouting Inspection, QCFR-M00-M725, 10-1.
c.
Installation of Instrument Racks QCIR-M00-M708-18-1 and QCIR-M00-M725-18-1.
The inspector identified this as an inspector follt.sup item because the installation inspections were not complete.
This item will be the subject of a further review by an NRC inspector during a subsequent inspection. (81-07-03)
5.
Qualifications of Personnel
-
The inspector reviewed the records of five Quality Control Personnel to ascertain whether applicable requirements have been met.
-
No item of noncompliance was identified.
6.
Review of Nonconformances The inspector review.d the records of four nonconformances to ascertain whether applicable requirements have been met.
Items inspected for this determination include:
--
NCR 4693, RCIC Relay Panel PGCC Separation
--
NCR 4549, M-1 Cable damage
--
--
NCR 4307, PGCC Terminating Cabinet Cable Ladders.
No items of noncompliance were identified.
.
g.
y
-
_ _ -
.
. --
.
-
. _
.
.
-
F
=
,
7.
Exit Interview The inspector met with licensee representatives (denoted in Paragraph 1)
i at the conclusion of the inspection on May 8, 1981.
In addition, the NRC
Resident Inspector, Mr. J. Durr attended the meeting. The inspector i
summarized the scope and findings of the inspection.
g
,
I
!
I
!
i
!
!
!,
!
i i
%
l i
I l
!
l l
l i
i
!
l l
!
l
!
i
!
!
i e---
,
-n.,--ve<
sn---,,-em,--rwe-r+
,w.-
n
~,. - -r-
- - - - - - -, - -,-
- - - - - - - -
v---
, -, -,,,
e-- - -. -...,,.
,-,r.,.c
,
,..-,
swe n
,.- r
-
-