IR 05000352/1981003
| ML19350C052 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Limerick  |
| Issue date: | 02/11/1981 |
| From: | Robert Carlson, Durr J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19350C051 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-352-81-03-01, 50-352-81-3-1, 50-353-81-03, 50-353-81-3, NUDOCS 8103300193 | |
| Download: ML19350C052 (9) | |
Text
s
'
"
U.S. tiUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSI0ti
,
0FFICE OF IriSPECTIOil AtlD ENFORCEMEtiT Region I 50-352/81-03 Report No. 50-353/81-03 50-352 Docket No. 50-353 CPPR-106 License No. CPPR-107 Priority
--
Category A
Licensee:
Philadelphia Electric Company 2301 Market Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Facility Name:
Limerick GeneratinJ Station
,
Meeting at:
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Meeting conducted: Jan' ry 27, 1981 NRC Personnel:
.
cc w cz,/
.'
- t/g[f/
.
J. P. Durr, Sen r Resident Inspector date signed Approved by:
d h b d2//o e g
j R. T. C4rlson, Chief, RC&ES Branch date signed.
Meeting Sumary
.
(Unit 1) Management Meeting on January 27, 1981 (Report 50-352/81-03)
Areas Discussed: A management meeting was held at the request of the NRC to discuss the resiilts of the Systematic Assessment of Licensee Performance for Limerick Generating Station. Assessment Period: October 1979 - September 30, 1980 Results: A summary of the performance evaluation was presented.
An crea of concern was discussed with corporate management.
Limerick's overall performance was considered acceptable.
(Unit 11) Management Meeting on January 27,1981 (Report 50-353/81-03)
Areas Discussed: A management meeting was held at the request of the NRC to discuss the results of the Systematic Assessment of Licensee Performance for Limerick Generating Station. Assessment Period:
October 1979 - September 30, 1980.
Results: A summary of the performance evaluation was presented. An area of concern w " " scussed with corporate management.
Limerick's overall performance was conucered acceptable.
)
'
Region I Fom 12 (Rev. April 77)
.
C103300 M
'
f l
Enclosure l'
'
l
t
-
-
.
DETAILS
-
1.
Meeting Attendees Philadelphia Electric Company V. S. Boyer, Senior Vice President Nuclear Power J. J. Clarey, Project Manager, Constructicn J. M. Corcoran, Field Quality Assurance Branch Head G. N. DeCowsky, Assistant Chief Electrical Engineer J. J. Ferencsik, Supervising Engineer, Nuclear Branch G. R. Hutt, Supervising Engineer Quality Assurance Office Branch J. S. Lemper, Vice President, Engineering and Research E. C. Kistner, Chief Mechanical Engineer R. H. Logue, Engineer-in-charge, Nuclear and Environmental Section R. A. Mulford, Project Manager H. R. Walters, Quality Assurance Manager Bechtel Power Corporation E. R. Klossin, Project Quality Assurance Engineer U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commissicn J. M. Allan, Deputy Director, Region I R.'T. Carlson, Chief, Reactor Construction and Engineering Support Branch J. P. Durr, Sen.ior Resident Inspector D. E. Sells, Project Manager,'NRR
.
2.
Meeting Scope On January 27,1981,-a management meeting was held at the request of the NRC at Philadelphia Electric Company's corporate office.
The purpose of the meeting was to discuss the results of the NRC's Systematic Assessment of Licensee Performance for the Limerick facility. The period of assessment;was_ ~ "
_
October 1979 - September 30, 1980.
.
3.
Areas Discussed a.
A summary of the Systematic Assessment of Licensee Performance (SALP)
program was presented to include the background and objectives of the assessment program.
~ b.
The results of the SALP for the Limerick Generating Station were oiscussed in detail. The d'.scussion stressed the singular area of concern, the implementation of ' subcontractor quality assurance programs.
Except for this area, the licensee's performance is considered acceptable.
. _ _. _ _ -.
_
_
.
e-h4-
.
..
.
.
.
c.
The licensee responded to the flRC concerns by citing the highlights of his efforts to correct identified deficiencies in this area.
.
d.
The flRC informed the licensee of the forthcoming reorganir.ation of the Region I Office and responded to licensee questions.
.
.
$
-
-
.
-
<
~
PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPAF(
-
' *.
LIMERICK GENERATING STATICri
.
UNITS 1 AND 2 b
EVALUATION BOARD MEETING OATA Facility: Limerick Generatir.g Station, Unit Nos.1 and 2 Licensee: Philadelphia Electric Company.
Unit Identification:
Occket No.
Licensee No./Date of Issuance Unit No.
50-352 CPPR 106 June 19,1974
50-353 CPPR 107 June 19,1974
Reactor Information:
Unit 1 Unit 2 NSSS General Electric (same)
'
3293 (same)
Evaluation Period: October 1, 1979 to September 30, 1980 Evaluation Board Meeting Date:
December 8, 1980 Evaluation Board Members:
B. H. Grier, Director, Regicn I J. M. Allan, Deputy Director, Region I
.
E. J. Brunner, Chief, RO&NS Branch, Region I
'
R. T. Carlson, Chief, RC&ES Branch, Region I W. G. Martin, Chief, SGDS Branch, Region I A
G. H. Smith, Chief, FF&MS Branch, Region I D. E. Sells, Licensing Project Manager, NRR d
'
Other. Attendees:
J. C. Mattia, Chief (Acting), Projects Section, RI J. P. Durr, Senior Resident Inspector, RI C. Michelson, Director, AE00, E00
.
- l i
.
a Enclosure 2
.
m'a
_
_,.
_
.
_
.
._
. _ _
,
_,
..
.
'
PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY
.
-
_
LIMERICK GENERATING STATION
.
i'-
-
UNITS 1 AND 2
'
'
'
-
..
BASIC PERFORMANCE DATA I
A.
Number and Nature of Noncompliance Items 1.
Noncompliance category:
Unit 1 Unit 2
Violations
0
-
Infractions
0 Deficiencies 5+(1)
0+(1)
_.
_.. _.. _ _.
_
.
_ _..
.
( ) Applicable to both Units 1 and 2
_
. __.
__
__
2.
Areas.of Noncompliance:
Unit No. 1 Unit No. 2
,
Functional ' Area Viol /Inf /Def-Viol /Inf /Def 1. Quality Assurance
2
3. Concrete-
'
.
~4. Liner-
5. Safety Related Structures
6. Piping and Hangers 4'
7. Safety Related Components-
8. Electrical Equipment
9. Electrical (Tray & Wire)
-
14.. Environmental
'1
15. - Trai ning.
. Totals'
0 17
0
1
,
ni
-
.
.
..
...
..
.
'
'
.
.
..
..
.
-
.
.
.
d
J
.,a.
,......,.
,c.
-
-
-.
.
-.-_
_ -.
_
.
- -
-
.
.
.
',,.
< : t,.
B.
Number and Nature of Constructicn Deficiency Recorts During the reporting period there were nine Construction Deficiency Reports (CDR's) submitted, divided among five functional areas.
The nine CDR's are cormon to both units.
Type of Events:
,
A.
Personal Error B.
Design / Fabrication Error
'
C.
External Cause D.
Defective' Procedures E.
Component Failure
.
F.
Other
_1, Total
Causally-Linked Events: No causally linked events identified.
C.
. Escalated Enforcement Actions
'
1.
Civil Penalties
-
None
,
2.
Orders
-
None 3.
Immediate Action Letters
-
None D.
tianagement Conferences Held During Past Twelve lionths January 16, 1980, Project Section Chief defined PEC0's responsibilities
--
- for reporting under 50.55(e).
l May 27, 1980, a meeting was held at the request of the licensee to
--
,
discuss Construction Deficiency Reporting requirements and organizational changes.
,
March 1, 1980, Meeting No. 50-532 and 353/80-06, a' routine meeting-to
--
- discuss PECO. organization changes,' project status, the inspection program, and NRC Bulletins, Circulars and Information Notices.
(None of the above meetings were considered enforcement related)
t
,
n
.-. N ea-
.p
.--.-m.
.,,.,-
,
as.'
e - -, - -.,,--
,,
y-
--,
yy n-.
.-
.,,
,,,,
,
.
~
-
.
,
.
.:
'
-
.
..
- .t,.
E.
Licensee Activities The licensee's latest "per cent complete" estimates.-indicate that Unit No.
1 is 63.7% and Unit 2 is 28.8.
The major work effort is being expended on Unit No.1 and currently consists mainly of the following activities:
Installation of the large bore reactor recirculation piping and valves.
--
Installation of the CRD hydraulic control units and jet barrier steel.
--
--
Installation of miscellaneous piping and restraints such as main steam, feedwater, RHR and main steam relief.
~ Reactor pressure vessel (RPV) nozzle modifications, safe ends and
--
thermal sleeve installation.
Installation of RPV incore probe housings and jet pumps.
--
--
Installation of electrical. cable trays and conduits.
.
--
Installation of the heating, ventilation and air conditioning systems.
F.
Inspection Activities During the evaluation period there were 18 inspections and 2 investigations.
Nine of these inspections were resident inspector initiated, seven construction specialists and one environmental. There was one combined resident / specialist team inspection. These inspections covered' the following areas: pipe erection and welding, storage and maintenance of equipment, design document control, electrical installations, concrete, quality assurance, reactor pressure vessel internals, fire prevention, noncenformance reporting,
~
environmental, v'entilation systems and control rod drives.
s
.
_
-
-
-
......
I
.
>
-
,
,
..
,
G.
Justification of Functional Areas Evaluated as Requiring Increased Inspection Frequency Quality Assurance - Due to the nature and number of noncompliances against subcentractors, increased inspections of this singular area is planned.
,
..
s
,
..
h
.
w
PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY
-
-
!*
LIMERICK GENERATING STATION
- ,.. ~ ;
UNITS 1 AND 2
'
INSPECTION PROGRAM CHANGES
.
INSPECTION TIME AND/0R SCOPE CHANGE FRQ4 PRESCRIBED INSPECTION PROGRAM FUNCTIONAL AREA INCREASE NO CH..NGE DECREASE 1.
Quality Assurance x
2.
Substructure and Foundations X
3.
Concrete X
4.
Liner (Containment and others)
X 5.
Safety-Related Structures X
6.
Piping and Hangers X
(Reactor Coolant and others)
7. ' Safety-Related Components X
(Vessel, Internals and HVAC)
8.
Electrical Equipment X
9..
Electrical (Tray and Wire)
.X-10.
Instrumentation X
11. Fire Protectio,n.
X 12. Preservice Inspection X
13. Reporting X
14.
Environmental.
X
.15.
Training
.X
.
16. Management X
,
W fS-+,1s
-.
'
ReionalDyector n M r? o Date
./
t:
-
a